reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the potential serious adverse effects of vaccines, attributing them to the spike protein causing inflammation in various organs. Bill Gates' involvement in vaccines is questioned, with emphasis on his financial gains. The speaker suggests that pharmaceutical companies prioritized profits over public health, leading to vaccine mandates. The conversation delves into the ethical implications of prioritizing money over people's well-being.

Dr. Ladipo's claim about DNA fragments in COVID mRNA vaccines has raised concerns among Americans. While it is possible for synthetic mRNA to be reverse transcribed in the human body, the speaker is not impressed with Dr. Ladipo or the attorney general's response. They believe that the vaccine has caused the deaths of 17 million people globally, with an injury to kill ratio of 34.4. The speaker criticizes the delay in taking action and calls for the removal of these gene products from the market. They also express distrust in the healthcare system, government, and the $5 trillion bribery scheme they believe has corrupted the system. The speaker urges people to seek alternative healthcare options.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines, specifically the Pfizer and Moderna ones, stating that they believe there are deliberate toxicities built into these vaccines. They argue that when the body is instructed to make a piece of foreign non-human protein, every cell that expresses it is seen as an invasion, leading the immune system to attack and potentially harm the body's own cells. The speaker also claims that all four companies producing COVID-19 vaccines intentionally chose the spike protein, which is biologically active and potentially toxic, as a component of their vaccines. They find this choice unusual and believe it to be a deliberate decision.

The speaker discusses the potential dangers of mRNA in flu shots and the combination of COVID and seasonal flu vaccines. They question why pharmaceutical companies remain silent despite people allegedly dying after vaccination. The speaker expresses surprise at the lack of recalls or investigations by companies like Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Novavax. They emphasize the need to watch the previous night's show for life-saving information.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines, specifically the Pfizer and Moderna ones, stating that they believe there are deliberate toxicities built into these vaccines. They argue that when the body is instructed to make a piece of foreign non-human protein, every cell that expresses it is seen as an invasion, leading the immune system to attack and potentially harm the body's own cells. The speaker also points out that all four companies producing COVID-19 vaccines chose the same part of the virus, the spike protein, which they believe is biologically active and potentially toxic. They suggest that this choice was intentional and not a coincidence.

The speaker raises concerns about the mRNA vaccines, pointing out discrepancies between official narratives and what they claim to have observed under a microscope. They mention the presence of RNA fragments and self-assembling nanotechnology in the vaccines. The toxicity of the COVID vaccines is discussed, with a mention of excess mortality and adverse effects on fertility. The speaker suggests that the vaccines are part of a depopulation plan and could be considered biological weapons. They claim to have found evidence of these vaccines in human blood. The lack of mainstream media coverage is also mentioned.

The discussion centers on the credibility of vaccine safety claims made by various health organizations and the FDA. One speaker argues that vaccines undergo rigorous testing, while the other contends that no vaccine has ever completed a long-term placebo-controlled trial before being licensed. They express distrust in the FDA, citing past issues with drugs like Vioxx and opioids, suggesting that the FDA misled doctors and the public about their safety. The speaker believes that pharmaceutical companies influence these agencies, leading to misinformation about vaccine safety. The goal is to address and rectify this perceived corruption.

The speakers discuss an interview with Robert Malone that received significant pushback. One speaker expresses disappointment in individuals like Joni Mitchell and Neil Young, wishing they would review studies and Robert Kennedy's book to become better informed. The speakers claim mainstream media's objectives prevent them from discussing certain topics. They suggest those criticizing the Malone interview likely hadn't listened to it, instead relying on mainstream media's portrayal of it as dangerous misinformation. One speaker asserts that everything Malone said has proven true, including claims about the lab leak, vaccine side effects, distorted studies, and information suppression. They mention a Yale study indicating spike protein production over 700 days post-injection, contrary to initial beliefs. They allege cover-ups, obfuscation, and doctors downplaying issues to avoid repercussions from mandating the injections.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines developed by Pfizer and Moderna, claiming that they contain deliberate toxicities. They argue that when the body is instructed to produce a foreign protein, the immune system goes into attack mode, potentially harming the body's own cells. The speaker believes that this mechanism of toxicity is intentional and points out that all four companies developing COVID-19 vaccines chose the spike protein as a target, which they claim is biologically active and potentially harmful. They find it unlikely that multiple companies would independently choose the same solution, suggesting a deliberate decision.

The speaker discusses the harmful effects of the spike protein found in COVID-19 vaccines. They mention a study showing that almost a third of patients experienced neurological issues from the spike protein. They express concern about the lack of an off switch for this gene and the potential for autoimmune and neurological harm. The speaker also addresses criticism of fearmongering and highlights the connection between the spike protein and HIV. They mention studies linking COVID-19 vaccines to autism in rats and discuss the use of edible vaccines in plants. The speaker emphasizes the importance of sharing information and concludes by promoting their video game.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines, specifically the Pfizer and Moderna ones, stating that they believe there are deliberate toxicities built into these vaccines. They explain that normally the immune system only attacks foreign substances, but when mRNA is introduced to the body, it instructs cells to produce a foreign protein, causing the immune system to attack the cells. The speaker believes this mechanism of toxicity is intentional and points out that all four companies producing COVID-19 vaccines chose the same spike protein, which they claim is biologically active and potentially harmful. They find it unlikely that multiple companies would independently choose the same solution.

Speaker 0 argues that "Big pharma is just not gonna sit there and go, this is wonderful. Bobby Kennedy, who's an anti vax wingnut, just canceled the most promising technology out there." He cites BARDA actions—"cancellation, descoping of various contracts and solicitations relate to mRNA vaccine development activities"—and says "We reviewed the science, listened to the experts enacted." He calls the "buried lead" that "you have to show the receipts here," warning that "the companies out there that are publicly traded" will pursue "massive lawsuits" and that critics are "a bunch of vaccine wingnuts." He urges HHS/BARDA to present "what we looked at" and "the underlying science" to back their conclusions, which he says are "180 degrees from what people have been spoon fed by the most credentialed class in the country." Speaker 1 adds that "over 3,500 peer reviewed papers" show harms and can be found at react19.org; "continued science comes out showing the harms." We should have done this research before immunization. Pharma will come back "guns blazing." We must "unify" scientists and, in court, "make the case that this was a good decision." He calls the stance an "opening salvo" and predicts the battle "is gonna be massive."

The speakers discuss the potential effects of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Speaker 1 explains that the idea of DNA fragments and reverse transcription in vaccines is a distinct possibility proven in vitro (in the laboratory) but not as solidly established in real-life humans. He says the machinery exists to reverse transcribe the synthetic mRNA in “these gene products” but notes skepticism about certain public figures and officials who allegedly ignored earlier communications. He cites Denis Rancourt’s data, claiming the vaccine has killed 17 million people and that the injury-to-kill ratio is 34.4. He translates this to global totals of 602 million injured or killed, with approximately 700,000 Americans killed and 2.5 million injured in the United States, describing this as an unprecedented injury-to-kill ratio in medicine and military contexts. He asserts that deadly gene products should have been removed from the market and from Florida two years ago. Speaker 0 asks whether Latipo was alerted two years ago and whether he ignored the warnings. Speaker 1 confirms that Latipo, Ashley Moody, and DeSantis did not respond to communications over the past two years, but notes that Latipo is now taking some action. The conversation shifts to how people can respond health-wise. Speaker 1 contends that health care systems and governments are corrupt, claiming the government has spent trillions of dollars to capture healthcare systems and push dangerous narratives. He urges listeners to leave the conventional healthcare system, describing it as corrupt and implying that healthcare professionals are silenced or fired for speaking out. He promotes an alternative health approach through a parallel system and mentions an emergency medical kit intended to address multiple dangerous diseases and scenarios, asserting that timely access to certain drugs is limited through ordinary medical channels. Throughout, Speaker 1 emphasizes drastic distrust of mainstream medical and governmental institutions, urging viewers to seek alternative health solutions and to prepare for potential health crises. He repeats that the traditional healthcare system is compromised and advocates a shift toward a different healthcare approach and emergency preparedness, including access to medications outside standard channels.

The speaker discusses their upcoming book on Dr. Fauci and criticizes his ties to the pharmaceutical industry. They claim that chronic diseases have increased under Fauci's watch and attribute allergies to aluminum in vaccines. They also mention the rise in autism and other chronic diseases, which they believe are side effects of vaccines. The speaker accuses regulatory agencies, Congress, and the press of being captured by the pharmaceutical industry. They highlight the influence of pharmaceutical advertisements on media and express concerns about the focus on medical effects rather than the human impact of policies. They question why economists are not included in discussions and make a comment about Anderson Cooper.

The speaker discusses the reaction to RFK and the controversy surrounding vaccines. They mention a book called "The Real Anthony Fauci" and express anger towards regulators and those involved in unethical vaccine experiments. They question the honesty of vaccine manufacturers and express concerns about the lack of safety trials for mandated vaccines. The speaker also criticizes Mark Cuban's stance on vaccines and suggests he has a vested interest. They conclude by stating that the Left may find Cuban to be a suitable candidate.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna, stating that they believe there are deliberate toxicities built into these vaccines. They explain that when the body is instructed to produce a foreign protein, the immune system goes into attack mode, potentially harming the body's own cells. The speaker also points out that all four companies developing COVID-19 vaccines chose the spike protein as their target, which they find unusual and potentially dangerous. They question why these companies would select a biologically active and potentially toxic part of the virus. Overall, the speaker believes there are significant concerns about the safety of these vaccines.

The speaker asserts that COVID-19 shots do more than affect the immune system; they can damage the brain and worsen mental health. They claim a wave of studies shows sharp increases in various strokes: ischemic strokes up to 44%, hemorrhagic strokes up to 50%, and transient ischemic attacks (mini strokes) up to 67%. They also report increases in neurological and autoimmune conditions, including myasthenia gravis up 71% and Alzheimer’s disease up 22%. Cognitive impairment is claimed to have risen by nearly 138%, while depression is up 68%, anxiety disorders up 44%, and sleep disorders up 93%. The speaker links all of these increases to “toxic spike protein accumulation and persistence in the brain.” The speaker states this is not a conspiracy theory and cites what they describe as documented peer‑reviewed research and studies by experts. They name epidemiologist Nicholas Holcher, who allegedly says that using mRNA to hijack cells in various organ systems to produce a highly toxic spike protein that persists in the body for months or years was “one of the worst ideas in medical history.” The speaker then asks, “So what can you do?” as a transition to presumably recommendations or actions, though no specific actions are listed in the provided segment.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines developed by Pfizer and Moderna, stating that they contain deliberate toxicities. They explain that when the body is instructed to produce a foreign protein, the immune system goes into attack mode, potentially harming the body's own cells. The speaker also highlights that all four companies developing COVID-19 vaccines chose the same spike protein, which they claim is biologically active and toxic. They find it unlikely that multiple companies would independently choose the same solution, suggesting intentionality.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines developed by Pfizer and Moderna, claiming that they contain deliberate toxicities. They argue that when the body is instructed to produce a foreign protein, the immune system goes into attack mode, potentially harming the body's own cells. The speaker believes that this mechanism of toxicity is intentional and points out that all four companies developing COVID-19 vaccines chose the spike protein, which can trigger blood coagulation, as the target. They find it unlikely that multiple companies would independently choose the same solution and suggest that this is a deliberate decision.

Doctors and politicians have promoted vaccines, but refuse to acknowledge potential harm. Many Americans who received the vaccine may face unknown risks. The truth must be revealed to prevent future harm from the mRNA platform.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines, specifically the Pfizer and Moderna ones, stating that they believe there are deliberate toxicities built into these materials. They explain how the immune system normally distinguishes between self and foreign substances, but when mRNA is used to make a piece of a foreign protein, the immune system goes into attack mode. The speaker argues that these vaccines cannot be safe for mass market use as they may cause the immune system to attack its own cells. They also claim that all four companies developing COVID-19 vaccines intentionally chose the spike protein, which they believe is biologically active and potentially toxic.

Speaker 0 raises a concern about the vaccine, asking why every new paper or study seems to claim the vaccine is responsible for a new problem. The question posed is whether the vaccine is really responsible for every negative outcome discussed in the literature, noting rises in cancers and cognitive decline. The speaker questions the blanket attribution of all adverse effects to the vaccine. Speaker 1 responds by suggesting that the world’s population has been poisoned, stating that the protein was devised in the Chinese security lab in Wuhan, China. The speaker claims it is not a natural protein and is not supposed to be in the body. They assert that one can obtain spike protein from having the infection, which almost everyone has had, and from taking the vaccine. The speaker contends that “it’s almost as if we’ve all been poisoned.” They further claim that the spike protein stays in the body and causes disease, listing several specific adverse outcomes: heart disease, neurologic disease, autoimmunity, blood clots, and maybe even cancer.