reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Police officers who viewed the laptop content experienced severe reactions, including vomiting, crying, and suicidal thoughts, with many no longer alive. The content depicts a ritualistic act involving child sacrifice and torture. The purpose is to bring up a demonic through the blood of the child. The ritual involves witchcraft, with the child placed in a pentagram circle while incantations are performed. The victims are tortured; one case involves a child chained to a tree, and another shows a child chained to a bed with a doctor present. One victim was a 10-year-old girl chained to a tree.

Lize, at the age of fifteen, reported her father, other men, lawyers, and the CEO of a large company for sexual abuse. She also revealed that she became pregnant and the baby was murdered, with the story involving ritualistic elements. Sanne ter Linge, an investigative journalist, explains that ritual abuse includes not only the desire for sexual relations with children but also other disturbing aspects such as drinking blood or being locked in coffins. Society tends to disbelieve these accounts, associating them with dark cellars, cult symbols, and candlelit chants. The difficulty of sharing these stories with law enforcement and the long waiting lists for trauma care are also highlighted. This is a narrative about the existence and challenges of ritual abuse.

A woman describes how unfounded information and conspiracy theories about COVID-19 and vaccines affected her family and led to a separation. The wife’s husband became absorbed in online content beginning around May of last year, and by August he had adopted and spread misinformation. The wife’s two children and husband lived together, but the wife learned around the time described that her husband had been distributing an A4 sheet containing what she calls information he had previously researched, near the middle school their daughter attended. On another day, the husband distributed a flyer himself. The material claimed, among other things, that vaccines shorten life expectancy to about two years, and it attributed other alarming ideas to vaccines and the pandemic. When the wife challenged the flyers, the husband insisted he was doing something correct and reacted with anger, which the wife found hard to understand. Their children were exposed to conflicting messages; for example, when the wife’s child asked why other people wear masks, the wife noted the husband’s stance that “masks are not necessary” and that the COVID-19 situation was framed as nothing more than a cold or flu, while other protective measures like hand washing and disinfection were rejected by the husband. The husband’s social circle reportedly continued going to bars and drinking together, despite the growing concern about safety. The family fought repeatedly over these beliefs, with the wife trying several times to stop the spread of misinformation, but the conflicts escalated and only worsened. Ultimately, to protect the family’s safety, the woman separated from her husband in February of this year. The rift within the family deepened over the spread of misinformation, and the wife described ongoing fear that misinformation would further damage family harmony. The discussion also notes that some people cite studies or papers to back such claims, but the speaker emphasizes that reading those sources often reveals a lack of scientific rigor, and that trusting such literature leads to confusion and regret. The speaker expresses that it is painful to see how misinformation undermines scientific credibility and harms family relationships.

Speaker 0 described a guest whose 18-year-old daughter was injected with Pfizer and developed cancer. He stated that he has sat across numerous people who lost their children to these injections, with some deaths immediate and others gruesome, and that these people must testify to lawmakers and others recounting their stories repeatedly. He framed this as a massive crime that needs to stop. He asserted that the FDA was fully aware that these injections would cause cancer, citing published guidance documents. He claimed that the FDA regulates the industry and, in 2015 and 2013 (and even more recently), wrote extensive guidance documents explaining to manufacturers developing mRNA products that they must study risks, including cancer, death, fertility issues, blindness, strokes, and cardiovascular issues. He said these risks were documented as regulatory knowledge and that manufacturers were told they had to study these risks and exclude them. He also claimed that studying these risks in healthy volunteers was not allowed because it was considered unethical. He contrasted this with 2020, stating that “all of a sudden, all of this is solved,” calling it a joke, and that this period raised his suspicions, prompting him to investigate independently. He concluded by describing the situation as a premeditated crime in which regulators knew, and that the military conducted a “fake exercise” to capture all these pharmaceutical companies and compel them to create these weapons.

Rudolf Verba, an Auschwitz escapee, testified about the camp's operations. His memoir was challenged in court by Ernst Zundel's lawyer, Doug Christie, who questioned the accuracy of Verba's claims. Verba admitted to dramatizing events in his book, "I cannot forgive," calling it a work of literature. The jury heard varying death estimates for Auschwitz, with Verba estimating 2.5 million deaths. Christie accused Verba of using memory techniques to maintain consistency in his lies. The cross-examination was intense, with Christie questioning Verba's memory and motives. Verba acknowledged that his book was based on multiple eyewitness accounts. Translation: Rudolf Verba, un fugitivo de Auschwitz, testificó sobre las operaciones del campo. Su memoria fue desafiada en la corte por el abogado de Ernst Zundel, Doug Christie, quien cuestionó la precisión de las afirmaciones de Verba. Verba admitió haber dramatizado eventos en su libro "No puedo perdonar", llamándolo una obra de literatura. El jurado escuchó estimaciones de muertes variadas para Auschwitz, con Verba estimando 2.5 millones de muertes. Christie acusó a Verba de usar técnicas de memoria para mantener la consistencia en sus mentiras. El contrainterrogatorio fue intenso, con Christie cuestionando la memoria y los motivos de Verba. Verba reconoció que su libro se basaba en múltiples testimonios de testigos presenciales.

Mary Morgan Ariel (Morgan Ariel on X) notes that Josh Hammer is now calling for Candace to be involuntarily committed to a mental institution. A clip is shown in which a commentator says, “In a just society, she’d be in a mental ward right now” and that they are a proponent of bringing back involuntary commitment laws of the 1960s, arguing that she should be involuntarily committed to a mental asylum. The discussion then connects this rhetoric to the way Epstein’s victims were treated in the past. The narrative then shifts to Karen Mulder, a former top model, who in 2001 went on a talk show and frantically named everyone who had assaulted her or involved her in being sold for assault. Her list reportedly included royalty, politicians, cops, and her own family. Before finishing, she was taken off the stage and eventually placed in a psych ward funded by Gerald Marie, the agent and owner of Elite Paris, who had signed her at 15. Marie would later be prosecuted on rape and sexual assault claims, but the case was closed in 2023 due to France’s statute of limitations, a outcome the speaker suggests could have been avoided if the matter had been taken seriously earlier. Mulder also named Jean Luc Brunel, an Epstein associate who was jailed on suspicion of rape and trafficking of minors and was found dead in his cell in 2022. Following Mulder’s 2001 interview, Morris publications claimed she was going through a psychotic episode. Her parents publicly blamed the outburst on drugs, and her sister Saskia appeared on the same talk show to discredit her, suggesting Saskia was also a victim. The account notes that Mulder’s reporting of abuse and childhood trauma fueled media attention and tabloid sensationalism, which led to her being labeled crazy. Mulder attempted suicide in 2002 but survived and later returned to confront the host, who pulled Mulder off air and deleted the tape of her testimony. The existence of the footage is inferred from testimonies in tabloids, Mulder’s statements, and audience comments. The discussion also references a TikTok influencer who described human trafficking as “the new satanic panic.” The speaker expresses distress at the comment and ties it to the broader pattern of desensitization around the Epstein Files; they argue that when there is no conclusion, people turn to humor, though they acknowledge the impulse to do so and caution against reducing the real trauma involved. The speaker emphasizes the seriousness of the issue, noting that victims can become perpetrators and that the situation remains critical. Karen Mulder is identified as being 55 years old at the time of the recount.

This report describes sexual abuse of children by satanic cults and human sacrifices. Theresa, now 15, says she was subjected to 12 years of abuse; At home, it was my nan, who led the gang. She describes "animals and people" involved and "the sacrifice" to please the devil. Authorities say the abuse was enormous and far beyond what we've heard before. Theresa recounts pregnancies starting at age 11, abortions by my nan or doctors at the house, and says fetuses were sometimes eaten. A big, expensive house; from the front, it looked like a castle. Police have charged five men with rape; Nan faces seven counts of aiding and abetting rape and two counts of performing abortions. Therapists affirm her truth: In my opinion, Teresa's account is not the product of a psychotic illness nor the figment of a fertile imagination. I believe her to be telling the truth.

Speaker 0 describes the spread of misinformation that claimed vaccines are “killing weapons” and that COVID-19 is a human-made crisis, calling it “baseless information.” This misinformation influenced a woman who lived with her husband and two children. The husband, who had been absorbed in online content since around May last year, began to show changes in behavior by August. Speaker 2 adds that he collected things he had researched on A4 paper and distributed them around the middle school near his daughter’s school; on a different day, the husband distributed a flyer as well. Speaker 1 mentions that people who had received vaccines were said to have an average lifespan of about two years, an assertion tied to the flyers. When the wife or others protested the distribution, the husband insisted that he was doing the right thing, and he reacted with anger, making it hard for them to understand him. The couple’s children were affected as well: when Speaker 0 left the house, the children wore masks, and there were statements suggesting that wearing masks was unnecessary or that those who did not wear masks should do so. The wife’s group was told that COVID-19 was merely a cold or flu, and this rejection of masks and other measures extended to handwashing and disinfection, with the husband arguing about not needing to adhere to these practices and claiming that certain friends drank together despite the precautions. Speaker 0 notes that the husband repeatedly asserted, “Corona is just a cold,” while he and his companions refused to wash hands or disinfect and continued to socialize aggressively. The family, constantly confronting the fear that they could be infected, tried several times to stop him, but those efforts only led to more fights. Ultimately, for the sake of the family’s safety, the wife separated from her husband in February of this year, resulting in a rift within the family. Speaker 1 emphasizes that this is rooted in baseless information, including the belief that documents or papers published in journals supported anti-vaccine arguments, which people used to promote demagogic claims. Speaker 1 adds that reading such literature reveals that many sources lack scientific soundness, and sometimes people believe them blindly without evaluating the literature. The speakers express a sense of regret and a need to confront the emotional impact of these events, but they refrain from evaluating the truth of the claims, simply presenting the sequence of actions and the resulting family fracture caused by misinformation.

Gabriel, an eight-year-old boy, described a pattern of abuse connected to his father, teachers, and other adults associated with his school and his family’s extended network. The interview centers on two main settings where the abuse occurred: a swimming pool in East Finchley and a school-related party, plus earlier incidents at home and with other adults. People involved - Gabriel and his family: His mother, known as Mama; his caregiver “Papa Hemp” (an adult referred to as Abraham who is described as Gabriel’s father figure and also as a father to him and his sister); his sister Emmy; his nanny Galina (also called Galina or Galina, Ukrainian/Russian family member who helps with cooking and housekeeping); other relatives such as Gabriel’s grandparents, including a Russian grandmother who lives outside England; a variety of named and unnamed extended family members. - Gabriel’s primary caregivers and household: Mama (the mother who is described as kind and supportive, who cooks, cleans, does juices, and provides money); Papa Hemp (the man Gabriel calls “dad” who does hemp juices and spends money on luxury items for Gabriel); Galina (the nanny, Ukrainian/Russian, who helps with pancakes and household tasks); Emmy (Gabriel’s sister); other adults in the household who are named less consistently. - School staff and associates: Christchurch Primary School in Hampstead where Gabriel says many teachers and staff were connected to his father. He names a number of teachers and staff by first and last names, including: - Miss Wilma (year one teacher, described as a friend of Gabriel’s father and the person who introduced him to other teachers). - Miss Forsyth (Kate Forsyth), the head teacher (Kate is her first name; Forsyth is the surname). - Miss Forsyth’s sister, also a head teacher, named Kate too (Kate Ungwyn or Ungwyn is referenced; the exact surname varies in the transcript). - Mr. Hollings (referred to as “mister Hollings,” the year four teacher who is to become Gabriel’s four-year teacher). - Miss Parsons (referred to as a leader among the teachers who knew Gabriel’s father). - Miss Clover and Miss Reese (assistants/teachers who were described as part of the staff). - Miss Wilma (again, described as a year one teacher who knew Gabriel’s father and who helped connect him with other staff). - Other staff names recur with uncertainty due to the chaotic transcript, but a broad network of teachers and school staff is repeatedly cited as being present during events. - Other adults at the events: Gabriel’s father’s friends, a man named Frank who is described as the McDonald’s manager or staff at the pool, and various parents who are named in relation to the disabled toilets incident. Key locations and settings - East Finchley Swimming Pool: Gabriel describes going there with his father (Papa Hemp) and his sister Emmy when he was about four years old. He recalls a changing room where his father and sister were present, and a disabled toilet where the abuse occurred. The pool complex is described as having a McDonald’s nearby and a McDonald’s inside the pool area itself, plus other facilities and a road and stairs near the pool. - The school and the school party: Gabriel recounts an incident on the last day of school in which a party at Christchurch Primary School involved sexual abuse. He describes a party that took place in the school, connected to a church space and school facilities, with dancing, and with teachers and parents present. He states that all the children attended the party and that many people, including teachers, parents, and his father’s friends, were involved in the abuse. He mentions a head teacher and other staff, including the year four teacher, present at the party. - Home and other settings: In the broader timeline, Gabriel refers to various other episodes including his mother’s explanations about anatomy (private parts, semen, the “white stuff” that comes out when wet or rubbed), and the risk and consequences described by his mother. He also describes exposure to alcohol, both wine and beer, provided by his father in various contexts; use of white powder to sniff; and other substances and behaviors introduced by his father and associates. Major events and claims - A pattern of sexual abuse initiated very early: Gabriel states that his father began abusing him when he was a baby or very young (one year old). He describes ongoing abuse across multiple settings, including at the pool and at home/with family friends. - The swimming pool incident: Gabriel details a recurrent pattern at the East Finchley Swimming Pool. He says his father and his father’s friends would take him and his sister into a large, multi-person disabled toilet, where they would perform sexual acts. He explains that the acts involved touching his private area, forcing him to put or be subjected to plastic Willy devices inserted into his bottom, which would bleed after removal. He says the acts occurred in the changing rooms, toilets, particularly the disabled toilet, and involved adults including his father, teachers, and parents who were there “in the disabled toilet” with him and his sister. He also mentions being taught to engage in sexual acts with other children at the pool and with other adults present. - The “plastic Willy” elements: Gabriel describes multiple “plastic willies” of different colors and sizes—bronze/dark skin color (brown), golden color, and white—for insertion into his bottom, describing the process as painful and bleeding after removal. He notes that the devices are made or bought by his father and his father’s associates; he references a person named Daniel as someone who helps make or procure the plastic toys. He emphasizes different color-coded descriptions for what he calls “brown/bronze,” “gold,” and “white.” - The teaching and social settings: Gabriel describes that his father had many connections with staff at the Christchurch Primary School, including Wilma, Forsyth (Kate), Ungwyn (Kate), Parsons, and others, suggesting that these relationships arranged or enabled the abuse. He states that the staff and parents were present at the pool events and at the school party, and that they engaged in or facilitated sexual activities with him and his sister. He describes that his father and the teachers would direct or coerce the children to participate in sexual activities, including oral sex on adults and other acts described in explicit terms. - The party day and the aftermath: The school party is described as lasting six hours and occurring during regular school hours, with a party atmosphere replacing standard lessons. Gabriel recalls being forced to engage in sexual acts at that party, being hit for crying, being injected with a sleeping injection by a nurse teacher so he would fall asleep, and being forced to participate in acts that included sexual contact with multiple adults, including his father, teachers, and other parents. He describes that his father killed babies and ate meat in a later part of the narrative about the party day, but the central focus is the party itself and the abuse that occurred there. - The “white powder” and alcohol: Gabriel recalls being given white powder to sniff by his father or adults, describing it as a substance that causes dizziness, headaches, and a “drunk” feeling. He describes European and Russian family connections as context for these experiences and mentions a green bottle with white powder in it. He also recounts receiving alcohol (white wine and red wine) from his father and feeling dizzy and headache-prone afterward, receiving tablets to alleviate symptoms. He notes that this happened when he was four years old and that his mother later admonished him not to put the white powder near his sister because it could cause babies to be born with severe problems. - The “seeds” and the white stuff: Gabriel describes the white stuff as being similar to semen in boys and having seeds that can multiply if they are brought into contact with another person or water. He explains that he was told to wash hands after handling the white stuff because the seeds can multiply, possibly causing pregnancy if transferred to another person. He emphasizes that the white substance can cause babies that might be blind, deaf, or otherwise disabled. He says his mother told him about the seeds and that it’s dangerous to expose his sister or others to the white stuff. - The self-harm and aggression: Gabriel recounts fighting with his sister, describing that following some of the episodes he engaged in violent acts toward his sister (hitting her, pulling her hair, etc.). He indicates these behaviors intensified after Abraham (Papa) moved in, and that his mother became very stressed as a consequence. He describes subsequent fear about reporting these events and the fear of retaliation by the adults involved, but then he begins to disclose earlier events. Rules and procedural notes from the interviewer - The interviewer (Steve) explains procedural rules for the interview: he is a police officer, with a partner described as Cleo who is the controller of the interview and a camera operator; there is Bethan from social services taking notes; the interview is structured to elicit truthfulness and precision, with an emphasis on avoiding guessing and on not considering Gabriel in trouble for reporting. - Gabriel is encouraged to use truthful accounts and to express himself with the language he chooses, including swear words, and the interviewer explicitly indicates that he would prefer him to supply the real terms (e.g., explicit sexual terms) to ensure accuracy in the record. - The interviewer confirms factual details like the date (11 September, a Thursday), the participants in the interview, and the structure of the interview. He also provides a mock example to illustrate truth-telling and asks Gabriel to identify lies and truths. - The interviewer clarifies that the purpose of the interview is to gather truthfully reported information about past incidents, including events that occurred at the pool, the school, and within the family network. Emotional and safety context - Gabriel communicates fear, confusion, and distress, especially around events at the pool and school. He alternates between recounting explicit acts and the broader social context of an abusive environment. He references fear of retaliation if the information is disclosed and expresses relief at having the opportunity to speak with an adult about what happened. - The narrative includes multiple references to consent, coercion, and the use of physical force to compel participation in sexual activities, as described by Gabriel. Overall content of claims - Gabriel reports extensive sexual abuse and coercion by his father, teachers, and other adults connected to the school and family circle, including forced sexual acts with both him and his sister. - He describes the use of plastic sexual devices inserted into his bottom, causing bleeding, and the performance of sexual acts in changing rooms and disabled toilets at the East Finchley Swimming Pool, in the presence of his father, teachers, and parents. - He recounts participation in a school party that involved sexual activities with multiple adults and a pattern of violence toward him for crying, as well as medical interventions (injections) to suppress crying. - He reports exposure to alcohol and illegal substances (white powder) given or introduced by his father, as well as instructions given by his mother about the dangers of the substances, including the propagation of seeds that could cause pregnancy and birth defects. - He describes a broader pattern of manipulation and complicity among adults at the school, including various named staff who allegedly knew his father and arranged or facilitated abuse. This summary condenses the key points and claims from Gabriel’s account, preserving the explicit statements and descriptions as provided in the transcript, without interpretation or judgment of the claims’ truthfulness.

A woman describes how unfounded information claiming that vaccines are “killing weapons” and that COVID is something related to people spread through her family and community. This misinformation contributed to a breakdown in her marriage and family life. A husband became absorbed in online content around May of last year, and his behavior changed. In August, the husband gathered what he had researched and printed it on A4 paper, which he then distributed around the middle school attended by his daughter. On a separate occasion, the husband distributed a flyer himself. The flyer claimed that the average remaining life after vaccination was about 2 years, and the family argues that distributing such flyers caused conflict, as the husband insisted that what he was doing was correct while the wife and others questioned why they were opposed to his actions. The wife recalls how, when she left the house to go out, her child would sometimes hear from others that wearing a mask was unnecessary, or that COVID-19 was merely a flu, and that they should not bother with masks, handwashing, or disinfection. The husband would dismiss precautions, saying, “the coronavirus is just a flu,” and would frequently go drinking with like-minded friends despite concerns about the family’s safety. The family’s situation deteriorated as the wife and children felt continually pressured by the husband’s views and actions, and attempts to intervene or stop the spread of misinformation led only to arguments, not resolutions. The family’s fear of contamination and the idea that the house could be contaminated weighed heavily on them, causing ongoing tension. As a result, to protect the family’s safety, the woman separated from her husband in February of this year. This separation created fractures within the family, with strains and conflicts arising over the dissemination of misinformation that labeled vaccines as dangerous and questioned the legitimacy of public health measures. Regarding the sources of misinformation, there is mention of papers or studies that claim certain things, which some use to fuel demagogic rhetoric. However, the speakers acknowledge that when they look at such literature, many sources lack scientific validity, and that reading them leaves a sense of frustration. The speakers emphasize that there are references circulated, but the scientific adequacy of those references often does not hold up upon closer inspection.

In the first house we entered, we found a couple tied up and tortured, with their children also tied up nearby. The children witnessed their parents being tortured, with body parts missing. The perpetrators then ate a meal at the table while continuing to torture the children.

- Thijs van den Brink introduces himself and is asked to confirm a past interview. He says he has interviewed many people and cannot recall details about a specific interview with Yvonne Köls regarding a child-abuse suspect vice president of the Hague court, mentioning the name Theo Huub. He offers to have the episode sent to him for refreshing his memory. The other speaker notes the exchange as unusual, suggesting it occurred under the CDA cabinets during Lubbers and was swept under the rug. - A separate speaker announces that the radio interview of Thijs van den Brink with Yvonne Köls from 2015 is on their YouTube channel, dated 19 August 2025, and invites listeners to check the text and listen. - The conversation shifts to Yvonne Köls’s 30-year-old novel about a pedosexual child judge. It is noted that it provoked strong backlash against her rather than the judge, including criticism, public opposition, and even physical intimidation. Despite this, the book is being republished. Köls explains that the case still disturbs her because the judge was never prosecuted, and the press largely gave attention to the opposing party rather than Köls or the victims. - Köls is a guest on a program. She explains the reason for reissuing the book: a new generation is interested and can engage with the topic. She mentions that the Catholic Church has taken steps internally and disrupted the system, and that investigations extended beyond the church to include child care institutions and care facilities. She states she had substantial knowledge from that period. - She reflects that at the time she could have spoken more about what she knew, but she was not heard. She notes that the children assigned to her pupils, who were also abused, were excluded from coverage by others at the time. She adds that the men involved are now 45 or 46 years old, and that the abuse occurred when the victims were between 10 and 15 years old. - The program concludes with acknowledgment that the victims have spoken.

Lisa describes from a trauma-laden account how her father, Tim Vos, allegedly gave her daily pills under the pretense of vitamin pills, which made her numb and less in pain, while he sexually abused her in multiple ways, including rape from both front and back. She claims he photographed her buttocks and touched her breasts, then poured a sharp-smelling liquid over her feet, which caused pain. She states he enjoyed her crying. She identifies him as Larissa Alwin’s husband and asserts that he also gave his wife, her mother, and her siblings pills, and took her at night to other men in the forest, to bars, and that her father sexually assaulted her there with other men, sometimes four in a row against a tree. She alleges there were other children and her babysitter Cindy van Rijn involved. She insists she must name certain people and that this was filed six years ago during a pedophilia investigation into Joris Demink. She claims the matter was laid on Herman Bolaar’s table during an investigation into Demink, and that Herman Bolaar is now rapporteur on sexual violence against children. She calls for these men to be arrested and states she has spent 30 years in the Scheveningse prison system around child murderers and child rapists, and that she is now returning the favor to victims, naming individuals who allegedly participated but are not to be named in the transcript. She then lists many individuals by name: Tim Vos; Tom Alachar, Rob Polak, René Kiers, the boss of S. M. Kingma, a child suspect; Anton Hage; Joris Demink; wijkagent Kees Vargevissen; Willem; Leon van Baal; Alard Vreelink; A. Van Meurs, a pediatrician; Cindy van Rijn (the babysitter) with alleged vaginal stains; Tanja Bender Polak, Raymond de Mooi; a Chinese man Ying; and references to a photo near Haga. She mentions a man with heavons named Ben, and provides another set of names: Willem Funderink, Almer Middelbeek, Bas Vletter, Mark van Fenney. She warns these people could immediately initiate a criminal case against her, but insists that the real material would come out, inviting them to proceed. She identifies herself as the whistleblower of justice and accuses Sander Dekker and Grapperhaus of lying in her case, and claims that Joris Demink has always been protected, including by various Dutch leaders (Mark Rutte, Balkenende, De Jong, Biesheuvel, Den Uyl, Wieghel). She asserts the abuse spans 50 years, beginning with Joris in 1971. She lists children who were abused, including Lucas Arachar, Sophie van Baal, Isabel Hage, sometimes a girl named Petra Meisje, Tjing Yi Qo, Laurin Rosalie, Roos, Laura, Emma, and describes in the forest how parents sometimes brought their children to Tim, including mentions of foreign children who were shot. She states Tom taught Demink to shoot at children with six guns. She challenges Joris Demink to bring her to court and accuses Sander Dekker and Grapperhaus of lying in her case. She proclaims herself the whistleblower of justice and contends three or more girls gave birth in the forest, possibly more, including her herself. She recounts giving birth in the forest under horrific conditions, with a baby boy who Tim allegedly stated, “it is not bad if he is dead,” and describes taking a pink baby bath, washing the baby, and the baby being assaulted and buried near a tree. She mentions that babies were raped and some were murdered, including a baby she saw with a babysitter Cindy van Rijn, and that she had to fetch baby supplies at Albert Heijn with Tim. She asserts the events are real and intends to publish all material online, inviting others to come forward, and ends by stating she came to speak the truth in the courtroom hall, where the president of the court watched on a large video screen, and she invites everyone to come forward.

Kevin Shipp, a former CIA officer with seventeen years of service, recounts a sweeping, real-world portrait of MKUltra, directed-energy weapons, and a long-running program of secrecy and retaliation at the highest levels of the U.S. intelligence community. He describes how the CIA and a “shadow government” targeted him and his family after he investigated a serious vulnerability in U.S. embassies—namely, foreign nationals in visa sections could hack an unclassified computer to identify CIA cover officers and assets. When he alerted CIA management, a division chief warned him to drop the matter, and his report was allegedly deleted. State Department IG later corroborated the risk to agents and rebuked the CIA; Shipp says this encounter left a laser-like targeting on his back. Following these events, Shipp says he and his family were transferred to a secret U.S. base where they were given a house known to be contaminated. Within months, severe illness struck: his children’s throats swelled, headaches surged, and his wife developed dementia. He asserts the house contained black mold and leakage of mica toxin (a chemical weapon Saddam Hussein used, described as yellow rain). With the aid of an attorney, Shipp reported the mold and toxins and sought redress, obtaining a clearance for his attorney to work with CI documents. He alleges that, after he filed a personal injury suit against the rental company, the couple faced intensified retaliation: surveillance, bugging, and a wave of neurological symptoms across the family—severe headaches, insomnia, nosebleeds, and immune and neurological damage. He asserts his oldest son’s immune system was severely compromised and that the boy’s symptoms resembled AIDS or radiation exposure; the son later developed PTSD and deteriorated mentally, leading to concerns about his whereabouts in Florida. Shipp asserts that senior CIA and Department of State officials attempted to silence him, including an IG officer who later confessed that George Tenet and a senior CIA official (Buzzy Cronk-gard) were ordered to silence and destroy him to prevent public disclosure. He describes a culture of intimidation, including a rise in the escalation of surveillance and obstruction of access to credit and resources. He recounts a “secret base” where additional disturbing occurrences were reported, including an observed figure described by guards as a goat-headed, cloaked figure (Baphomet) witnessed by multiple witnesses, including the base commander’s son. Shipp asks whether this symbol signals demonic activity or a psyop and notes that the accounts were later corroborated in mainstream outlets as to the base’s existence. On MKUltra itself, Shipp defines it as a practice that used drugs (LSD, mescaline, etc.) without participants’ knowledge to monitor brain activity and to create programmable “born” super-soldiers or data mules who would forget the information they carried. He claims the program included sexual abuse, sleep deprivation, beatings, hypnosis, and other forms of torture to break and reprogram minds. He cites Victor Marchetti’s assertion that MKUltra did not end in 1973 and mentions Elizabeth Nichol-son’s studies asserting continuing existence. He argues that the Church Committee inquiry led to the destruction of thousands of documents and suppression of testimony, preventing reform. He cites Sirhan Sirhan as a potential later MKUltra subject and notes Carol Warner’s work with patients who had MKUltra exposure. Shipp connects these activities to broader patterns of power and secrecy: mass mind control through contractors (Lockheed Martin, SAIC, Booz Allen Hamilton) who hold CIA clearances, and a culture where tens of thousands of Americans are bound by secrecy agreements that preclude speaking out. He claims Lockheed Martin monitors mail and has access to the U.S. Post Office, suggesting pervasive surveillance and control. He connects Venezuela’s use of directed-energy weapons to the broader capabilities of the CIA and other national actors, arguing that these technologies go back twenty years or more and have spread to Russia, China, and elsewhere. He contends that Havana syndrome and related phenomena are related modalities and suggests the CIA’s upper echelons do not share the full truth with Congress, recalling Chuck Schumer’s warning about “six ways from Sunday” to retaliate if you cross the intelligence community. He argues for reform: dismantling or reforming the CIA and moving intelligence functions to accountable bodies so that oversight becomes feasible again. Throughout, Shipp emphasizes the human cost: his wife and children still suffer PTSD and neurological damage, his son remains missing, and he himself continues to face pressure and retaliation. He frames his narrative as a call to expose the abuses of secrecy, advocate for accountability, and awaken the public to the alleged realities of MKUltra-era and post-era mind-control capabilities.

They eat babies. It's true. It's not just pets; they are like vampires, craving human flesh and blood. Many kids I met in mental institutions came from cults, and this has been covered up. I pray that before the next election, people wake up to the truth about what the worst individuals are doing. There are countless victims, especially children, who suffer from the epidemic of child sexual abuse in America. The statistics are alarming: 1 in 3 girls and 1 in 4 boys are affected. This issue can't be ignored any longer; it's becoming more apparent, and people must choose a side.

The two speakers discuss the media coverage surrounding a high-profile case. The second speaker says the media coverage has been absolutely unfair and biased. They’ve done many interviews and are reaching a point where they won’t do them anymore, trusting the media less. They note a preference for live interviews because edited pieces distort their message. A concrete example is CBC’s Karen Pauls: she interviewed Russ Harald, Sudhoo, and several families who forgave. The second speaker claims Harald told them Pauls didn’t include half of what he said, and that she did the same to Andrea and Shauna Nordstrom (Logan Hunter’s mother). They allege that Nordstroms were given a bit part in a story that portrayed the subject as loving and forgiving, downplaying negative aspects, making it seem like the subject was sympathetic. The second speaker claims Karen Pauls twisted the narrative, and contends that much of the media has done this. Consequently, they’ve declined numerous interviews and no longer trust mainstream media regarding this story. The second speaker adds that there are people with no vested interest who want to express approval or forgiveness to feel good about themselves and to allow the subject to stay in the country. They contrast this with others who are deported for other offenses, such as those who steal $5,000 cars and are permanent residents who get deported. They have listened in on immigration and refugee board hearings to learn more about the process. They claim that because the case is so prominent, some people want to excuse the subject, even if it means allowing criminals or poor drivers to stay, thereby harming the system. The first speaker asks what precedent would be set if the subject were allowed to stay in Canada. The second speaker replies that it would imply that 16 lives mean nothing and questions how many people one would have to kill to be deported, underscoring the idea that the mere possibility of killing someone is central to the debate. They insist that raising the question of whether the person killed anyone is itself “crazy.”

This story reveals the horrifying experiences of Teresa, a 15-year-old who endured years of sexual abuse and witnessed human sacrifices by a satanic cult. She recounts being raped by family members and forced to participate in rituals involving animals and people. Her grandmother, whom she lived with, was a key figure in this abuse. Teresa describes witnessing multiple murders, including that of a homeless man and newborns, and being made to eat her own aborted fetuses. Despite the trauma, she is now learning to live in a loving environment with her mother. Authorities are investigating her claims, and some cult members have been charged with serious crimes. Medical reports support Teresa's account, and experts affirm the reality of such abuses.

This story delves into the horrifying world of satanic cults engaging in sexual abuse and human sacrifices, as revealed by a victim named Teresa. She recounts being abused since the age of 2 by her grandmother and others, involving acts with animals and multiple perpetrators. Despite the unimaginable suffering, Teresa is now finding love and healing with her mother. The police believe her account to be true, highlighting the disturbing reality of child abuse within cults.

This video discusses the sexual abuse of children by satanic cults, including human sacrifices. The story focuses on Teresa, a 15-year-old girl who has been a victim of this abuse for 12 years. She shares her horrifying experiences of being raped by family members, strangers, and even being forced to have sex with animals. Teresa's mother confirms the scale of these crimes, describing them as mass murder. Despite the unimaginable suffering, Teresa is now living in a loving environment and slowly rebuilding her life. The video also includes evidence, medical reports, and expert opinions that support Teresa's claims. Several cult members, including Teresa's grandmother, have been charged and are awaiting trial.

Speaker 0: Stop, Sandrine, stop. I am wrongly single. I have three children, raising them alone. Do you know why my husband died? Do you know when he died? In January, after the third dose, sudden cancer, gone in three days. Now my children are alone. They have no parents, no father especially, because they still have me. Okay, now in September, you're going to vaccinate our children, make them take this poison. Don't laugh, please, because that's the insolence you're showing. Okay, exactly. I am trembling, you can't imagine how much I hate you, Mr. Macron, when you were my husband, please, the father of my children. Because of a shitty third dose.

In 2001, one of the most sought after models in the world goes on a talk show. Karen Mulder frantically starts name dropping everyone who had either assaulted her or sold her to be assaulted. This list would include royalty, politicians, cops, and her own family. But before she’d be done, she’d be taken off the stage and eventually put into a psych ward paid for by the very person she claimed started selling her in the first place, her agent and owner of Elite Paris, the man who signed her at just 15 years old, Gerald Marie. He would be prosecuted years later with an insurmountable amount of rape and sexual assault claims, only for the case to be closed in 2023 due to France’s statute of limitations, which could have been avoided if anyone in the French courts had taken her seriously at the time she reported them because, yes, she did report them. And if that wasn’t enough, I have something even more infuriating. One of the names she dropped during that talk show was Jean Luc Brunel. He was an Epstein associate who was found dead in his cell in 2022. He was jailed on suspicion of rape and trafficking of minors. Sorry. Hold on. After Karen’s 2001 interview, numerous publications would come out claiming that she was going through a psychotic episode. Her parents would publicly blame this outburst on drugs, and her sister Saskia would go on that same talk show just to discredit her sister, which may sound surprising. But remember, part of her desperate plea for someone to listen and do something included the abuse she endured in her childhood. So it’s safe to say Saskia was also a victim. It’s complicated, but it fueled the media and it fueled the tabloids to call her crazy, and she tried to take her own life in 2002. Thankfully, she survived and she’d returned to that same talk show to confront the host, heard this desperate plea, pulled her from air, and then deleted the tape. So the video of her speaking her truth would be scrapped altogether. The reason that we know this exists is because of his testimonies in the tabloids, hers, and audience members. Everyone called her crazy until the Epstein case started coming out. I read someone here on TikTok, a female influencer with a lot of followers, comment once on a video and say that human trafficking was like the new satanic pan. I remember it had a lot of likes, and I was so disturbed then, and I’m even more disturbed that comment lives in my head when I read the story because that interview could have saved twenty years of children. Twenty years. And to be put in a psych ward by the very man who first did it, who by the way was the ex husband of Linda Evangelista. Feel free to go down that rabbit hole. This isn’t satanic panic. This is real. And the idea of it being satanic panic, like this huge, silly conspiracy everyone’s talking about is actually so destructive. And I feel like the desensitization that we have towards the Epstein files is becoming more and more rampant because when something is so devastating and so traumatizing and we’re not getting a conclusion, the go-to is to turn it into humor, which I do get. I’m not villainizing anyone for that. But if we’re gonna do that, we still have to keep this level of anger. Karen is 55 years old now. She is still a person in this world. Her only mistake was not doing that interview on a live television show.

Mary Morgan Ariel, who goes by Morgan Ariel on X, claims that Josh Hammer is now calling for Candace to be involuntarily committed to a mental institution. A clip is presented to illustrate this pattern, followed by the assertion that others are calling for people to be put in mental institutions. The text then references a statement: “In a in a just society, she'd be in a mental ward right now. She would have been in an immense award a while ago. I personally am a big proponent to bringing back the involuntary commitment laws of nineteen sixties. In my view, she should be involuntarily committed to a mental asylum.” This is linked to parallels drawn with how Epstein victims were treated. The narrative moves to 2001, focusing on Karen Mulder, one of the most sought-after models at the time, who on a talk show frantically names people who assaulted her or sold her to be assaulted, including royalty, politicians, cops, and her own family. Before finishing, she is taken off the stage and eventually put into a psych ward funded by Gerald Marie, the agent and owner of Elite Paris, who signed her at 15. Marie would later be prosecuted for rape and sexual assault claims, but the case was closed in 2023 due to France’s statute of limitations, which could have been avoided if her reports had been treated seriously. The account continues with Jean Luc Brunel, an Epstein associate who was jailed on suspicion of rape and trafficking of minors and was found dead in his cell in 2022. After Mulder’s 2001 interview, numerous publications claimed she was going through a psychotic episode. Her parents publicly blamed drugs, and her sister Saskia appeared on the same talk show to discredit her, suggesting Saskia was also a victim. The media and tabloids labeled Mulder crazy, and she attempted suicide in 2002. She later returned to confront the host, who pulled her from air and deleted the tape, erasing the video of her truth. This information is inferred from tabloid testimonies, Mulder’s accounts, and audience members. The narrative notes that a TikTok commenter, a female influencer with many followers, described human trafficking as “the new satanic pan,” a statement the speaker found disturbing. The speaker emphasizes that the story behind Epstein is not satanic panic, but real, and expresses concern that the desensitization to Epstein files is growing as a conclusion is not reached. The speaker asserts that victims have become perpetrators, highlighting the severity of the issue. Karen Mulder is described as 55 years old now and still a person in this world, with the sole mistake being not doing that 2001 interview on live television.

I was in the VIP lounge when I was asked to serve a guest named Andrew from England. He arrived with two children, Alina and Dimitri. Later, I saw the children sobbing and half-naked in front of Andrew. It was disturbing to witness. The director told me to dress the children, but they continued to act strangely. Eventually, two men came and took the children away in a helicopter. I was deeply affected by the experience and regret not taking action. I left Ukraine and now reflect on what I could have done differently.