reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The episode opens with broad, meta talk about “the agenda,” then shifts to a discussion of immigration and an ICE incident in Minneapolis. The hosts claim the incident involved an ICE agent being struck by a vehicle during an attempt to detain a woman they identify as Renee Goode (also named Gabriela Shyzen Panskiewicz in later rundown), who allegedly blocked the road and resisted law enforcement with a left-wing protest milieu. They describe footage showing the officer being hit by the car and argue the car was used as a weapon; they say the officer was attacked after, and that he fired because he was assaulted, with the driver’s alleged actions described as intentional and deadly. They assert the left encouraged street fighting of federal officers and reference Minnesota’s “Ice Watch” and a social-justice charter school tied to the couple. They contend the woman taunted the officer and that her partner urged her to drive, highlighting differences between left-wing rhetoric and the reality of federal enforcement. The discussion includes allegations about the couple’s finances and welfare status, mockery of the woman’s poetry, and claims about her alleged writings including a piece titled “Dissecting Fetal Pigs.” They suggest the couple was not typical “soccer moms” and mock media misidentification of a photo, noting the real name of the person involved and accusing Democrats of exploiting the incident to push an anti-ICE narrative. The segment includes claims about the wife’s treatment of children and custody, and a discussion of religious perspectives, portraying the woman as “demonically possessed.” The hosts claim the national immigration crisis is being addressed via stronger deportations, and they praise President Trump’s use of federal authority to deport. The show then transitions to tech and security topics. They discuss the fourth industrial revolution and the “beast system,” questioning Trump’s familiarity with tech oligarchs after a reported dinner with Elon Musk. They mention Trump signing a memorandum to accelerate six G deployment and raise concerns about implantable technologies, citing a White House memorandum stating that six G will be foundational to national security and that it will aid emerging technologies like AI, robotics, and implantable technologies. They speculate about implantables, including the possibility of brain chips, and discuss the potential for these technologies to be used for surveillance or control. A reported budget item is highlighted: the Department of War’s budget includes 44,000,000 for “cognitive electromagnetic warfare,” to be run by the Air Force’s RDT&E. They reference a NATO attachment defining cognitive warfare as exploiting cognition to influence decision making through advances in technology. The hosts entertain the possibility of manipulating minds, including a hypothetical situation involving pedophiles, and discuss the idea of testing technologies on subjects like targeted individuals (TIs)—people who claim to be microchipped or targeted by electronic signals. They present Dominic, a TI who produced a trailer about Havana syndrome, directed energy weapons, and mind-control technologies. The trailer features testimonies about microwave-like harassment, voices in the head, and visions, with speakers asserting that directed energy weapons cause terror and mental manipulation. The hosts connect these claims to broader fears of a coming “transhuman” or “Beast system,” and they suggest the TI community is turning to faith for relief. Throughout, they promote sponsors and investments in precious metals (Goldco) and discuss silver’s price movement, asserting that silver rose to around $80 per ounce over the break and endorsing Goldco’s New Year offers, including up to 10% back in free silver or gold on qualified purchases and a free 2026 gold and silver kit. The program signs off with a light segment on dad jokes and a tease for future coverage, promising more discussion on transhumanism, implantables, Havana syndrome, and related technology topics, with the hosts planning live events and future segments.

Speaker 0 describes capabilities to disrupt an individual from the cellular level to the system level, targeting a specific individual with little attribution or trace, and leaving prior to attribution. The aim includes disrupting individuals and the social fabric, up to influencing through various levels. Speaker 1 claims that targeting demonstrators can make them suicidally depressed, so they no longer demonstrate, with one pulse frequency causing people to be too upset to act, preferring sleep or bed. He says we are in a new cold war and that countries are developing this technology, with microwave transmitters going up everywhere because someone could use them for other effects; the system is up and running. Speaker 2 notes MIT was awarded around 2005-2006 a half a million dollars for acoustic heterodyning, enabling sending a signal from two points into an individual so they literally hear a voice in their head that nobody around them hears. Speaker 1 adds that stimulating the cochlea with a resonant frequency is easy, and voices can be heard physically, not imagined, with any conversation and for any person; it can be a soft angelic voice, a god, or something that scares you like a devil. Speaker 2 states that DARPA led contracts in 2011-2012 to the University of California for electronic telepathy, monitoring brain activity at a distance to determine thoughts, and developing complex signals to send into another’s brain to transmit a message; the technology described is where the field stands today. Speaker 0 emphasizes the brain as the twenty-first century battlespace, with neurocognitive science weaponized in military, personal, and professional lives; the weaponization is valid, valuable, and already an operational play; the brain is the current and future battle space. New aspects include in-close use, targeting individuals with possible direct attribution or covert engagement with non-attribution, and a formal definition of a weapon involving directed energy affecting physiology peripherally and brain health, with embassy incidents in Havana and possibly China cited. Transcranial neuromodulation is discussed as a method to modulate brain networks and implant brain-machine interfaces, including DARPA’s N3 program (non-invasive neurosurgical neuromodulation) led by Doctor Al Mundy, aiming to place minimal electrodes to read and write into real-time brain function remotely, affecting attitudes, beliefs, thoughts, emotions, and activities. Speaker 1 explains an infrared device linked to a pencil-thin microwave source to target a specific gland or brain region, eye, or heart to cause targeted suffering. Speaker 3 states intelligence communities are gaining too much influence over governments, moving toward a Stasi-like state, warning that agencies threaten fundamental human rights and calling for verification and oversight to keep agencies in line, implying that governments will experiment on individuals if pursued. Speaker 1 asserts that over the last forty years, governments have lied to protect industry and profits, and that the industry and supporting government parts will cause more civilian deaths and suffering than all terrorist groups, possibly more than World War II, with a claim that this is genocide and that those responsible are untouchable and outside the law, tied to IGNAP, WHO, and national health agencies as the same people. Speaker 3 expresses disappointment in the American public for not being more irritated, contrasting with Germans who remember totalitarian history (Stasi, Gestapo, SS), noting sensitivity in Germany. Dr. John Hall is mentioned in this context. Speaker 4 references a memorandum from the president about whether current legislation protects individuals and whether ongoing experimentation exists, noting loopholes in informed consent; horror experiments like Willowbrook, MK Ultra cited, funded by DoD and intelligence agencies, questioning IRB oversight and informed consent; a rise in complaints about electromagnetic weapons, including microwave auditory effects, silent sound spectrum, EEG cloning, remote lab-to-home transmission; testimony that 1,500 victims report identical electromagnetic exposure complaints. Speaker 5 introduces Katherine Nestor from Pennsylvania, who recounts non-consensual testing, COINTELPRO-like stalking, remote neural monitoring, and electromagnetic torture causing psychological and physical damage; she urges immediate action and congressional hearings, referencing Dr. Amy Gutmann and new work for the Commission for Human Subject Protection. Speaker 3 introduces Connie Marshall from Louisville, Kentucky, a formal mayoral candidate and eight-year victim of directed energy assaults, listing symptoms: body overheating/cold, seizures, heart pain, earaches, itching behind eyes, swelling, involuntary movements, exhaustion, rapid heart rate, hair loss, mind paralysis, hypnotic states, drone/satellite tracking, controlled dreams, sleep deprivation, voice-to-skull, extreme muscle spasms/cramps, eye pupil circles, continuous monitoring, destruction of devices, and being watched 24/7.

On 03/26/2026, the Pentagon's Strategic Capabilities Office (SCO) quietly announced BIOW, basic information awareness operations, a cognitive warfare program that changes the rules of the battlefield through belief rather than bullets or bombs. The SCO sits inside the Office of the Secretary of Defense, with a mandate to deliver breakthrough capabilities to war fighters typically within three to five years. Sam Gray, SCO's chief technology officer and lead for autonomy and artificial intelligence, leads BIOW. Speaking at the National Defense Industrial Association's Pacific Operational Science and Technology Conference in Honolulu, Gray stated: the goal of cognitive warfare is to disrupt the cognition and the thinking ability of an adversary or person and influence how they perceive, sense make, and act. This is not propaganda in the old sense. This is something fundamentally different. For most of military history, influence operations required a physical observable. In World War Two, the Allies inflated fake tanks to fool German reconnaissance. You needed something the enemy could see. Gray said that era is over. Quote, I don't actually need the physical observable because I can generate both the physical observable and the associated narrative that comes along with it, and I can promulgate it across the digital environment that allows it to go everywhere. BIOW. BIOW is built on three technological pillars. Pillar one, detection: systems designed to identify adversary generated materials to see what the enemy is pushing into the information space before it takes hold. Pillar two, multimodal effects: AI models capable of generating text, video, and audio, synthetic content designed to shape how target populations perceive events in real time. Pillar three, population modeling: a large scale simulation environment that can model entire populations and produce quantitative metrics. Answering the question Sam Gray himself asked, how good am I doing with this narrative? Did it resonate like we thought it was going to? The technology architecture Gray described is deliberately lean and distributed. Quote, give me 100 Mac minis with 100 different agents on them that are out running and operating, that are lightweight, small, do not require gigawatts of power. This is not a massive fragile supercomputer. This is a swarm. But there's a problem Gray openly acknowledged: the off the shelf AI systems we all use, ChatGPT, Gemini, do not think like Russia. They do not think like China. They were trained on American data shaped by American assumptions. Gray said directly, we have to get to a point where we can understand what it is that they think about and what we can create from a model perspective to emulate and behave like our adversary does. BIOW's goal is to build bespoke AI models specifically tuned to adversary cognitive frameworks. Why is this urgent? Gray pointed to two ongoing adversary campaigns as evidence: The United States is already behind. First, Iran's information operations during Operation Epic Fury. Second, China's large scale efforts to, in Gray's words, change the way that certain populations are thinking. And then Gray stated plainly, The United States is not currently positioned to counter these operations at machine speed. Quote, we need to start to get into that space. Congress didn't wait. The 2026 National Defense Authorization Act directed the Secretary of Defense to formally define cognitive warfare for the department, assign organizational responsibility, and assess the value of narrative intelligence with a deadline of 03/31/2026. BIOW does not operate in isolation. In 2025, the US Army created Detachment 201, the Executive Innovation Corps, commissioning four Senior Silicon Valley technology executives directly into the Army Reserve at the rank of Lieutenant Colonel: Andrew Bosworth, Kevin Weil, Shyam Sankar, and Bob McGrew. They wear the uniform and serve within the chain of command. Together, BIOW's technology stack and Detachment 201's Silicon Valley expertise represent a deliberate convergence of artificial intelligence, influence operations, and military command structure. NATO's chief scientist framed the stakes: cognitive warfare targets trust networks, identity narratives, and institutional legitimacy. The battle space is continuous, operates below the threshold of armed conflict, and the measure of success is not a message received, but a durable change in how a population thinks, decides, and acts. The human mind is now a contested domain. As of April 2026, BIOW is active: performers are being on-ramped, models are being built, simulations are running. And Gray made one thing clear about the vendors chosen to build this system: those who don't keep up will be cut. Quote, I will offramp you. The battle for cognition has begun. Whether you believe this program is an essential shield against adversary manipulation or a capability that raises profound questions about who defines the adversary and where those tools can be aimed, one fact is not in dispute. This is real. It is funded. It is operational. And you are now aware.

- Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the possibility that a friend was murdered and suggest that both victims died suddenly from fast-moving cancer, a method they say the agency uses overseas to eliminate people. Speaker 1 admits he cannot prove this but notes the sudden deaths. - The conversation asserts that the US government has technology to infect people with fast-moving cancer and to perform cognitive and directed-energy warfare. Speaker 0 states the government has the technology to infect with fast-moving cancer and to do so absolutely. - In 1997, Speaker 1 describes a hearing on asymmetric threats where he chaired the research committee and focused on four threats: drones, cyberattacks, electromagnetic pulse (EMP), and cognitive warfare. He asserts that cognitive warfare is now being labeled by some as Havana syndrome and that directed-energy weapons are the underlying technology. - Speaker 2 recounts a recent homeland security hearing about foreign adversaries using direct weapons against US citizens, enabling incapacitation. He emphasizes the chilling nature of the briefing and criticizes current domestic leadership as foolish, corrupt, incompetent, and wicked. - Speaker 3 notes that up to 40% of the Air Force equipment budget in the 1990s was classified, making much of it “black.” He emphasizes that military and security research often precedes civilian medical science, and that servicemen were used in experiments without fully informed consent, referencing NK Ultra-era disclosures of thousands of service members used as subjects. - Speaker 4 discusses MKUltra, describing a Canadian experiment involving psychic driving with massive LSD doses, eye-tracking, and memory loss, funded by MKUltra and affecting civilians. He mentions Project Midnight Climax, where Johns were observed in brothels while subjected to LSD, and notes similar experiments by the British Royal Air Force and Army. The results of Midnight Climax are unknown, with no published after-action reports. - Speaker 3 adds that Secretary of Energy O’Leary stated under Clinton that over a half a million Americans had been used in human experiments over four decades without informed consent, including mind control, with no accountability. He argues that mind-control technology has advanced, and questions who should govern its use, given the lack of legal frameworks. - The discussion covers mind-effects research and the lack of treaties governing such technologies. They reference a European Parliament security and disarmament resolution (1999) addressing mind-effects and mind-control technology, and Russian Duma resolutions (2002) seeking similar safeguards. Zabigniew Brzezinski’s Between Two Ages is cited regarding electronically stroking the ionosphere to influence behavior over geographic areas, connecting it to HARP and other electromagnetic carriers capable of mass or individual influence. - Speaker 6 explains historical demonstrations of electronic mind control, starting with Jose Delgado’s remote manipulation of a charging bull using radio energy and electrodes, and notes later work showing noninvasive techniques to influence behavior using low-power magnetic fields. Speaker 7 reiterates Delgado’s animal studies and the potential for noninvasive methods to affect emotions and memory, with broader implications for humans. - Speaker 3 discusses the progression of research funded by DARPA and others toward higher-resolution control of brain activity, enabling controlled effects that override senses and create synthetic memories, raising questions about future justice and evidence. They describe European Parliament and NATO/US military interest in mind-control technologies and the absence of robust legal protections. - Speaker 9 presents advances in AI-enabled brain-reading and memory-altering devices, including mind-reading and emotion decoding, while Speaker 10 and Speaker 12 discuss privacy concerns, brain-data privacy laws (Colorado’s law adding brain data to privacy protections), and the availability of consumer devices that decode brainwaves. They warn that brain data can be misused by insurers, law enforcement, advertisers, and governments, with private companies often sharing data without clear disclosure. - The segment concludes with a note that devices can infer attention and thoughts, and that DARPA’s N3D program aims for noninvasive neuromodulation with implantable electrodes read/write capabilities. It references 1980s–1990s discussions of RF energy as a potential nonlethal mind-control technology, and a 1993 Johns Hopkins conference listing low-frequency weapons as attractive options.

In this video, the speaker discusses the existence of a system that manipulates people through the use of secret electrical signals. They explain that the Department of Defense has a global information grid that monitors and controls human bodies through wireless body area networks. The speaker emphasizes that humans emit electromagnetic radiation and are part of the electromagnetic spectrum. They also mention the use of computer networks for electronic warfare and the routing of signals through human bodies. The speaker criticizes the lack of education on these topics and urges viewers to recognize the reality of these systems.

Your body's electricity is real, and there's no need for fear. This is not some hidden conspiracy; it's a business rooted in cognitive threat warfare technology from 2012. The systems in place are based on physics and biophysics, not supernatural phenomena. Every human body has an electrical and magnetic biofield that can be measured. Despite this, misinformation persists, suggesting it's all about demons or aliens. There are established layers of cyber and biological security developed with organizations like the United Nations and IEEE since the early 2000s. It's misleading to promote fear while ignoring the scientific reality of these technologies.

Directed EMP weapons have been developed, and the founder of Palantir, an AI platform used by the military, has played a significant role in revolutionizing warfare. The capability to neutralize drones was available at any moment.

Foreign adversaries are allegedly using direct energy weapons to incapacitate US citizens, as in the "Havana syndrome" cases. Neuroscience is being weaponized with aerosolizable nanomaterials that disrupt neurological activity, and DARPA's N3D program aims to create implantable electrodes for remote brain reading and writing. Experiments with radio frequencies on animal brains have been ongoing for decades. A captured Russian "LIDA machine" used flickering lights, sound, and electromagnetic oscillations to induce trance-like states in prisoners. Jose Delgado implanted circuits in animal brains in the 1960s, using RF to control behavior. By the mid-80s, he found that modulating the right frequency with low energy could alter behavior without implants. JF Gordon MacDonald proposed electronically stroking the ionosphere to affect behavior over large areas. Military documents from the early 1980s discuss mind control possibilities via RF energy. A 1982 Air Force report stated RF can disrupt normal behavior, and a 1987 report called for more research on RF as a nonlethal weapon. Remote brain monitoring and alteration have been possible for over 50 years, referencing a 1976 patent for an apparatus using electromagnetic energy to scan and affect brainwaves remotely. A 1994 US Air Force document discusses using pulsed electromagnetic energy to control emotions, produce sleep, transmit suggestions, and interfere with memory, even duplicating experiences in another individual. It's suggested that negative psychological states could be broadcast to populations.

This video discusses the potential of radio frequency (RF) weapons and their implications in warfare. RF weapons, which operate within the radio frequency segment of the electromagnetic spectrum, could have devastating effects on military personnel and equipment. The Soviet Union is believed to be ahead in RF weapon development, particularly in high-powered microwaves that can disable electronics and incapacitate humans. The video also explores the concept of electronic mind control, where RF devices can alter human moods and awareness. The potential use of RF weapons by the Soviets and the United States' limited knowledge and research in this area are highlighted.

The conversation argues that the symptoms being discussed are “symptomatic right now,” framing them as the result of “beta tests” and “a new form of war.” It claims that the United States, the UK, Russia, China, and India all have the relevant technology. The speaker then responds to a question about whether the affected American patients share political beliefs. They say that, instead of focusing on shared politics, they are relying on a report from *Surgical Neurology International* that describes microwave frequencies being used as a weapon of war. They also reference an article they read about China turning on “six G,” stating that in 6G it has the ability to read and manipulate the human brain. The discussion further claims that if someone has nanotech “in you,” they are “no longer considered human,” and introduces a new term for the human species: “Homo Borg Genesis.” The speaker concludes by saying that if this is imposed without consent and people are no longer considered human, “the debate is gonna come at some point here.”

Military-grade psychological operation strategies, tactics, technologies, and capabilities have been developed for combat against citizens. The US, along with European allies and NATO partners, publicly condemned China for cyber hacks. These operations aim to induce psychological terror and feelings of imminent destruction, using psychotronic or electromagnetic weapons to influence the mind. Capitulation can be achieved without violence by piggybacking extremely low frequency signals on radio, TV, or microwave communications to manipulate the thoughts and feelings of the target population.

This video discusses the potential of radio frequency (RF) weapons and their implications in warfare. RF weapons, which operate within the radio frequency segment of the electromagnetic spectrum, could have devastating effects on military personnel and equipment. The Soviet Union is believed to be ahead in RF weapon development, particularly in high-powered microwaves that can disable electronics and incapacitate humans. The video also explores the concept of electronic mind control, where RF devices can alter human moods and awareness. The potential use of RF weapons by the Soviets and the United States' limited knowledge and research in this area are highlighted.

Speaker 0 describes the ability to disrupt an individual from the level of their cell to their system, and to disrupt individuals on a variety of levels from individuals up to the social fabric; to target a specific individual, change or eliminate that individual with very little attribution and trace, and leave prior to attribution. Speaker 1 explains that targeting demonstrators could make them suicidally depressed, so they are too upset to demonstrate; with one pulse frequency, people could become so suicidal they won’t act as demonstrators, preferring sleep or bed. They argue we are in a new cold war, with countries developing this technology and microwave transmitters going up everywhere because someone could use them for other effects; the system is up and running. Speaker 2 notes MIT awarded to Woody Norris in 2005 or 2006 half a million dollars for acoustic heterodyning—sending a signal from two points into an individual so they literally hear a voice in their head that nobody around them hears. Speaker 1 adds that the easiest ones involve stimulating the cochlea with a resonant frequency; voices are easy, and people physically hear them, not just imagine them. It can be any conversation and any voice, from a soft angelic voice to a god, a devil, or anything that scares you. Speaker 2 states DARPA led contracts in 2011–2012 to the University of California for electronic telepathy—monitoring brain activity at a distance to determine what someone is thinking, and developing complex signals to be sent into another brain to transmit a message; this represents the current technology. Speaker 0 asserts the brain is and will be the twenty-first-century battlescape, with neurocognitive science weaponized in military, personal, and professional life; the brain is the current and future battle space. The new aspect is in-close, with targeting at levels allowing direct attribution or covert engagement; a formal definition of a weapon includes directed energy to affect physiology peripherally and brain health, citing US embassy personnel in Havana and possibly in China. They mention transcranial neuromodulation and implanting brain-machine interfaces as part of DARPA programs, notably the N3 program (non-invasive neurosurgical neuromodulation) by Doctor Al Mundy, aiming to place minimal electrodes to read and write brain function in real time, remotely, influencing attitudes, beliefs, thoughts, emotions, and activities. Speaker 1 adds a method for causing a specific psychiatric illness using an infrared device paired with a pencil-thin microwave source to target a specific gland, part of the brain, eye, or heart. Speaker 3 emphasizes that intelligence agencies are gaining too much influence over governments, moving toward a Stasi-like state, threatening fundamental human rights; there must be verification and mechanisms to keep agencies in line, by law and technical means. Speaker 1 contends that if governments want to experiment on people by the thousands, they will; they could diagnose insanity through covert experiments, and low-level microwaves are linked to cancers and ill effects; this began in the 1950s and continues. Speaker 3 expresses frustration at not reaching government members to disclose what they’re doing, noting a shift away from human rights toward money, control, and power. Speaker 1 states that over the last forty years, governments have lied to protect industry and profits, and that the industry and the government segment promoting it will cause more civilian deaths and suffering than all terrorist groups; they claim this could be genocide, sanctioned by major health and research institutions, with a small circle of powerful individuals. Speaker 3 conveys disappointment in the American public for not being more irritated; contrasts with Germans, who remember Stasi and Gestapo; Doctor John Hall is cited. Speaker 4 references a memorandum from the president about protecting individuals and ongoing experimentation; notes loopholes in informed consent, referencing Willowbrook, MKUltra, and radiation experiments conducted without informed consent; mentions DoD and intelligence funding and the challenge of IRBs, with alarming complaints of electromagnetic weapons. Speaker 5 introduces Katherine Nestor from Pennsylvania, stating the commission has discussed abuse of human research subjects, mentioning co intel pro-like stalking, remote neural monitoring, and electromagnetic torture causing psychological and physical damage; she asks for today’s dramatic response and a congressional hearing, urging not to wait seventy years to investigate. Speaker 3 thanks the audience. Speaker 4 (Connie Marshall) identifies as a former Louisville mayoral candidate and an eight-year victim of directed energy weapon assaults, describing body overheating and extreme cold, seizures, heart pain, earaches, eye burning, swelling, involuntary movements, exhaustion, seizures, hair loss, mind paralysis, dream manipulation or trance-like states, drone or satellite tracking, sleep deprivation, voice-to-skull, blue eye circles, constant monitoring, destruction of electrical devices, and 24-hour observation and monitoring despite no criminal history.

The transcript centers on claims that the United States used directed energy weapons during the kidnapping raid in Caracas to capture Nicolás Maduro on January 3, 2026, with Redacted independently confirming the news from multiple sources. The host asserts that this technology is not new and that the U.S. has used it on previous, unreported occasions. The operation, termed “Absolute Resolve” and part of a broader Caribbean campaign, allegedly involved roughly 150 aircraft conducting strikes around Caracas before Delta Force and CIA operatives seized Maduro and Celia Flores and flew them out. Reuters is cited as framing the raid as a strategic message to China and Russia, noting that air defenses supplied by those countries were reportedly disabled in the opening moments. A circulating Venezuelan security guard’s transcript, which is also retweeted by White House press spokesperson Carolyn Leavitt, is highlighted as aligning with what modern electronic warfare and directed energy weapons can do. The guard describes a scenario where all radar systems shut down without explanation, followed by a large drone presence over positions. He recounts a moment when something was launched that produced “a very intense sound wave,” after which his unit experienced severe physiological effects: people bleeding from the nose, vomiting blood, and an inability to move or stand. He describes eyes going blind first and bodies collapsing, with the head feeling like it would explode. The host clarifies what is meant by directed energy, distinguishing electronic warfare (attacking the spectrum, jamming, spoofing, overload, or cutting networks) from kinetic actions. The Economic Times is cited as describing something called the “Wraith” as an electronic warfare umbrella used in the Maduro capture to create a digital blackout that paralyzed security infrastructure. There is some confusion around the name because CX2 markets a product called Wraith as an autonomous airborne EW platform that locates high-value emitters such as jammers and radars, with a promotional video illustrating its jamming capabilities. A third component discussed is sonic or acoustic weapons. The listener is shown a concept of active denial technology described by the Pentagon as a focused beam of radio frequency millimeter waves that penetrate only about one sixty-fourth of an inch into the skin, causing an intolerable heating sensation that compels movement; stepping out of the beam ends the sensation. The host references a Fox News segment in which Peter Ducey tested the system, illustrating crowd-control and perimetry uses. The conversation then elaborates that directed energy weapons are a real arms category used by major powers for years, with China and Russia possessing their own systems. The host mentions that initial testing of these weapons reportedly occurred in Afghanistan, with subsequent use in Syria during the Obama era, and asserts that the U.S. has employed such weapons for years, including during the Maduro operation. The discussion includes warnings against overestimating unilateral U.S. dominance in this arena, noting that both China and Russia have developed and deployed directed energy capabilities and that the technologies are broader and older than some public narratives suggest. The segment also touches on ongoing geopolitical dynamics involving Iran and global security concerns related to these weapons.

Directed energy weapon targeted individual patents from the year February, pulsative manipulation of central nervous system. Published in 02/2002, method and device for producing a desired brain state via magnetic waves. And this fun one from 2013 has four different assignees, controls brain state by placing engineered EMF patterns into the AC wiring of a building. And from 2014, induced desired brain state in person by adding waves into a music file. And from the year February, induce desired emotional state through an EMF, sleeplessness, sexual arousal. 2015 monitors vital signs of subject via remote application of radar waves handheld. And then here's one from 02/2002. Remotely transmit intelligible subjective sound into targeted consciousness. Voice to skull. Oh, and who's the original assignee? The United States Air Force. And so would the USDP government use such patent?

The speaker discusses the potential for controlling the human race through electromagnetic influence. They explain that any mental state can be artificially injected into the human brain from an external source, and this capability already exists on a global scale. They mention a paper published by Doctor Persinger in 1995, which explores the possibility of accessing every human brain through electromagnetic induction. By identifying specific brain characteristics, individuals can be targeted and their memory, consciousness, and sense of self can be accessed and modified. The speaker compares this research to the work of doctors Ewan and Cameron, who sought to control the human race through more primitive means.

The video discusses the importance of modernizing weapon systems and addressing vulnerabilities to cyber attacks. It emphasizes the need for network security solutions and highlights the role of electronic warfare in manipulating the human body. The speaker urges transparency about these practices and encourages research into biofield connections.

Military intelligence literature since 2000 shows a push towards connecting human bodies to an external control grid using bionanotechnology. The purpose of 5G/6G and Starlink projects is questioned, suggesting they could be used for remote targeting and control. This could lead to asymmetrical warfare with no chance of fighting back. The goal seems to be linking humans to a technocratic network.

Deborah Tavares discusses a NASA war document found on NASA’s website, stressing the urgency of exposing its content to a broad audience. The PowerPoint, presented in July 2001 by Dennis Bushnell, chief NASA scientist at Langley, is titled future strategic issues, future warfare circa 2025. Tavares notes the document states, “the presentation is based in all cases upon existing data, trends, analysis, technologies, no pixie dust,” and that its premise centers on robots, cyborgs, and humans, highlighting a conflict between “future and now.” On page 93, the document allegedly contains alarming claims: “capture, torture Americans in living color on prime time,” followed by plans for terror attacks within the Continental United States using binary biologicals, taking down critical infrastructure, and employing an EMP, radiation frequencies against brains, and serious cyber and collateral damage. It also references “exploit CNN syndrome.” The discussion points to the involvement of multiple agencies (US Air Force, DARPA, CIA, FBI, Southern Command, Atlantic Command) and international partners, framing the document as part of a global corporate-planned assault. Page 66 reportedly states that humans are increasingly limited and that “humans are too large… too heavy, too tender… too slow,” with “huge logistical trains” and “rapidly decreasing to negative value,” suggesting a shift toward reliance on technology. The conversation ties these ideas to broader narratives about “USA Inc.” and a perceived loss of constitutional government to corporate influence, pointing to works like the Iron Mountain report as evidence of stealth attacks on constitutions and the integration of corporate power with military and intelligence structures. Other highlighted topics from the document include the use of beam weapons (page 45) and the notion that “the use of frequencies will be used in warfare.” There is discussion of “microdust” as a weapon—“micron sized mechanized dust, distributed as an aerosol and inhaled into the lungs, the dust mechanically bores into the lung tissue.” The document also mentions the mapping of brains, potential brain-to-machine transfers, and that “they have already mapped our brains.” Frequencies and metered infrastructure are connected to broader concerns about smart meters and energy control. Deborah and a co-presenter discuss how elites shield themselves, suggesting that frequency attacks are met with unknown countermeasures, and that transhumanism and brain research (including the US Brain Project) are part of a broader plan. They argue that “mass media propaganda” will be used, and emphasize that “towers will be used to emit frequencies” (page 98). The conversation links these ideas to environmental manipulation (chemtrails, nanofibers, fluoride) and to a broader program of social engineering, food control, and population management. For solutions, they advocate education through key documents: the silent weapons for quiet wars document (41 pages), the Iron Mountain document, and the New World Order Exposed (1969), all available on stopthecrime.net. They urge readers to recognize the fraud, understand who is allegedly behind these plans, and study the NASA document to form a basis for action. The interview promotes continued dissemination via stopthecrime.net and related sites, including smartmetersmurder.com, which features videos on the weaponization of frequencies and the deployment of cell towers disguised as trees or other structures. The conversation closes with a call to wake people up, promote grassroots awareness, and consider non-revolutionary reform to counter what they describe as a long-standing, multi-layered assault on humanity.

The speaker discusses the use of human bodies in electronic warfare, emphasizing the exploitation of the electromagnetic spectrum. They highlight the integration of biosensors made from human DNA into the global information grid for surveillance and monitoring. The speaker delves into the manipulation of body temperature and neural pathways through networked systems, ultimately revealing the sinister implications of utilizing human bodies in warfare and surveillance operations.

The speaker discusses the use of artificial intelligence and bioelectromagnetic algorithms in various fields, such as therapy and biotechnology. They highlight the existence of the human body's electromagnetic field and the exploitation of this by corporations and the military. The speaker criticizes the lack of discussion and transparency surrounding these technologies, emphasizing the need for open dialogue and awareness. They also touch on topics like genetic algorithms, the manipulation of human consciousness, and the control of individuals through electronic warfare. Overall, the speaker urges for a greater understanding and acknowledgment of the impact of these technologies on human bodies and society.

The speaker discusses how the human body is connected to the cloud through electromagnetic warfare. They explain that the electromagnetic spectrum is used for surveillance and communication, including within the human body. They highlight the existence of the biofield, an electrical and magnetic field emitted by the body, which has been exploited for 60 years. The speaker criticizes the lack of awareness and understanding around this topic, emphasizing the importance of recognizing the body's electrical nature. They also mention the use of wireless body area networks for medical monitoring and the potential risks of hacking and manipulation.

The speakers discuss alleged military and Department of Defense documentation in which cell towers are not described as cell phone towers but as directed energy weapons (DEWs). They claim that documents exist that refer to a phone as a DEW and to a router as a DEW, and that such classifications demonstrate a framework in which devices operate as directed energy delivery systems. They state that control over people is achieved through frequencies, with emphasis on extremely low frequencies, heart frequencies, and a range of radio spectrum bands from megahertz up through gigahertz and higher (three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten gigahertz, microwave frequencies, and radio frequencies). The speakers assert that these frequencies can be used to influence or manipulate individuals, implying a mechanism of influence or control via electromagnetic signals. The conversation also touches on music as a vector for such control, noting that there is “the opposite of that too, like the good music with the esophageal tones,” which suggests contributors believe music can be used in conjunction with frequency technology for manipulation. They claim that there are devices or methods involving frequencies embedded in music that can affect listeners. A recurring theme is the notion that certain metals in the body are needed, described as “a lot of metals in your body,” because metals are used as transducers and receivers for these directed energy systems. The speakers imply that the human body itself can be part of a transduction network, enabling reception and transmission of electromagnetic signals. They maintain that people are exposed to EMFs and frequency devices as part of this broader mechanism. The speakers indicate they have access to, and would be willing to share, DOD and related documents with listeners who want to examine the information themselves, reinforcing their point that these claims are grounded in verifiable materials. Overall, the transcript presents a narrative that: (1) military and defense documents reframe common infrastructure (cell towers, phones, routers) as DEWs; (2) control or influence is purportedly achieved through a continuum of frequencies across a wide spectrum, including heart-related frequencies; (3) music and esophageal tones are mentioned as vectors or modulators; (4) bodily metals are described as necessary components for transduction; and (5) there is an invitation to review the cited documents to verify these assertions.

Trevor Coppola and Deborah Tavares discuss a NASA war document they found publicly accessible on the NASA website, presenting it as a crucial revelation about planned technologies and strategies for future warfare. Key details about the NASA document - The document is a PowerPoint presentation by Dennis Bushnell, described as the chief NASA scientist at the Langley Center, titled future strategic issues, future warfare circa 2025, presented in July 2001, a few months before 09/11. - Deborah Tavares notes the document states on page four that the presentation is “based in all cases upon existing data, trends, analysis, technologies, no pixie dust,” and emphasizes a premise about robots, cyborgs, and humans. - The discussion highlights page 93 as particularly shocking, including statements about “capture torture Americans in living color on prime time,” “terror attacks within the Continental United States using binary biologicals,” the use of an EMP, radiation frequencies against brains, and other forms of serious warfare and collateral damage; the document also references “exploit CNN syndrome.” - On page 66, the document asserts that humans have increasing limitations and downsides—“Humans are too large. Humans are too heavy, too tender. Humans are too slow, both physically and mentally”—and argues that huge logistical trains are required because humans are of decreasing value. - The document lists involvement by a range of agencies and entities such as the US Air Force, DARPA, the CIA, the FBI, Southern Command, Atlantic Command, the Australian Department of Defense, and other corporate/government bodies, portraying a global corporate-influenced framework in which “USA Inc.” operates beyond a constitutional structure. - Other asserted topics in the document include beam weapons, microdust as a new type of warfare, and the claim that the use of frequencies will be central to future conflict. It is alleged to mention technologies like brain mapping and direct manipulation or intervention in human evolution, with references to transferring a human brain into machinery and the existence of micron-sized mechanized dust distributed as an aerosol. - The discussion connects these ideas to smart meters and energy infrastructure, stating that frequencies and metering systems would affect people and that campaigns and technologies could target populations via communication networks and energy grids. Overall narrative and context - The interview frames the NASA document as evidence of a planned, multi-faceted assault on populations using frequencies, beam weapons, bioweapons, and surveillance, culminating in social control and depopulation goals, with mass media playing a propaganda role. - Deborah Tavares links the document to broader conspiratorial literature and documents, including the Iron Mountain report and the Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars (41 pages), describing them as war plans to control humanity and restructure society through surveillance, economics, education, and engineered fear. - The speakers argue that the document reveals a program of mind control, depopulation, and technocratic domination, with specific references to chemtrails, nanofibers, fluoridation, and a global strategy to reduce population and dependence on traditional governance. Path to action and resources - The recommended response is rapid public education about these documents and their implications, with emphasis on reading and understanding sources such as the Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, the Iron Mountain document, and the New World Order exposes (all linked from stopthecrime.net). - They advocate for awakening a grassroots movement rather than revolution, warning that revolution could trigger martial law and enable more severe weaponization. Public access and where to learn more - The primary site is stopthecrime.net, with links to smartmetersmurder.com and related YouTube content, including a series by Barry Trower on the weaponization of frequencies in relation to wireless infrastructure and cell towers.

You might wonder how a signal reaches only me when I'm next to someone else. Think about when your phone rings at a table – do the phones of those around you also ring? That's how. The body is targeted using bioelectromagnetic algorithms. These algorithms measure the body's bioelectricity, perturbing the human biofield with biological signals. These bioelectromagnetic algorithms are incorporated into machine learning classifiers. The machine learning reads what's happening under your skin and reports it to a database, your digital twin. The Department of Defense has been developing this for fifty years. These biosensor systems are very robust and part of our network-centric warfare doctrine.