TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker was asked if they misspoke about carrying weapons in war, despite never deploying to a war zone. The speaker responded that they are proud of their 24 years in uniform and their service in public education. They believe people know them and that their record speaks for itself. Regarding the alleged misstatement, the speaker said they were discussing carrying weapons of war after a school shooting. They acknowledged their grammar isn't always correct. The speaker stated that they will never demean another member's service.

I was an F-15 pilot and a commander in the newly created U.S. Space Force. I was fired and lost my pension for criticizing DEI trainings in the military, which I believe are divisive. Thank you for acknowledging the issue with woke generals. I propose establishing a special task force to prevent such ideologies from returning to the Defense Department. I appreciate your willingness to put me on that task force.

On December 15, 2021, the speaker filed an Article 138 against their chain of command for violating the law by administering experimental COVID-19 injections, which they claimed were dangerous to public health and safety. In response, the speaker was court-martialed under Article 92. The individual responsible for the court-martial then allegedly bragged about it on social media. This individual is now a House of Representatives member for District 7 Virginia. He sits on the House Armed Services Committee.

I authored the legislation that ended the COVID vaccine mandate in the military, which had led to the discharge of thousands of active-duty members. I aimed to make this change retroactive, allowing those discharged, including highly trained personnel like SEAL team members and army rangers, to return. Unfortunately, every Democrat and two Republicans, Mitt Romney and Mike Rounds, voted against this effort. I'm frustrated but optimistic about future chances to rectify this, especially with a Republican-controlled House and Senate. I plan to push for this in the next National Defense Authorization Act and will urge the new defense secretary to allow those discharged for vaccine refusal to be readmitted to their previous ranks and positions.

Secretary Austin, are you confident in President Biden's mental capacity? Why are military members being discharged for not getting vaccinated while Hamas supporters like Aaron Bushnell are allowed to stay?

So after twenty years of service in the military, yesterday, I got pulled into an officer's office and counseled for a post that I have on my social media. During the counseling, they told me I'm under investigation as a threat to national security, and the proof they gave me are anti Israel post. When I joined the military, I took an allegiance to support The United States Of America. I did not ever take an allegiance to support Israel, but yet I am deemed a national a threat to national security because I do not support Israel. Since when does not supporting a foreign nation get a US soldier investigated for being a threat to national security.

The speaker questions a senator's qualifications to vote against Pete Hegseth, given the senator allegedly lied about their own military service. The speaker directly asks the senator if they would like to answer the question.

How many genders are there? Two. What is the diameter of an M4A1 rifle round? It's 5.56. How many push-ups can you do? I did 5 sets of 47 this morning. What's the most important strategic base? Guam is significant. How many rounds fit in an M4 magazine? Standard is 30. What does the M9 Beretta fire? A 9 millimeter. What batteries for night vision goggles? Duracell. Your qualifications show you understand the battlefield. Decisions made here can lead to the deaths of young Americans, often from lower middle-income families. When they join the military, they do so for various reasons, and when mistakes happen, they don’t come home. My priority is ensuring you support the warfighters. That’s what matters most to me, and you have my support despite the process.

Pat Lohmeyer, a former lieutenant colonel and commander in the Space Force, was fired for criticizing the military's diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) trainings. He believes these trainings, rooted in critical race theory and Marxist ideology, divide troops and create animosity towards the country they serve. Lohmeyer's formal complaint about illegal race-based discrimination was dismissed by Lieutenant General Stephen Whiting. He testifies about ongoing Marxist-inspired efforts to weaken the military and American society, referring to it as a culture war. While some members of the committee deny the existence of a culture war, Lohmeyer argues that DEI initiatives, including CRT, drag shows, trans activism, LGBTQ pride celebrations, and woke military recruiting videos, are visible components of this war. He opposes expanding diversity initiatives and indoctrination in the military.

Matt Lohmeier, a former lieutenant colonel and commander in the Space Force, was fired for criticizing the military's diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) trainings. He believes these trainings, rooted in critical race theory and Marxist ideology, divide troops and create animosity towards the country. Lohmeier submitted a complaint about these violations, but it was dismissed. He testifies about ongoing Marxist-inspired efforts to weaken the military and American society. He mentions differing views on the culture war, with some criticizing DEI initiatives and others dismissing it as a political talking point. Lohmeier argues that service members don't want these initiatives in the military workplace. He presents evidence of negative impacts and warns about recruitment and retention issues. Lohmeier concludes by urging the nation to abandon divisive paths.

Initially, USAID was created with good intentions. However, the agency has broken the trust with the American people and hasn't been transparent about where our taxpayer dollars are going. In 2021, the special operations command put out an instruction manual with instructions and examples on how the military could work with the state department, intel services, and USAID using race riots in order to destabilize nations. They also advocated for setting up job fairs near some of these riots so that disaffected workers could gain employment. These operations are taking place without government oversight, without the authority of the president, without the authority of congress. USAID needs to condemn this and provide oversight to congress on exactly where our tax dollars are going. Do you agree that this is wrong?

Tim Waltz, you played a significant role in the George Floyd riots, delaying the National Guard's deployment while Minneapolis burned. You allowed sensitive information to leak, enabling looters. You labeled Trump and his supporters as fascists, contributing to a hostile environment. Your administration has enacted extreme youth surgery laws, allowing teenagers to undergo irreversible procedures, and supports radical abortion laws with no limits, resulting in the legal murder of newborns. You advocate for open borders, suggesting a "ladder" for illegal immigrants. During COVID, you approved significant funds for frontline workers, yet a large portion went to ineligible individuals. You align closely with Democratic leadership, presenting yourself as a moderate while embodying radical policies.

During a congressional hearing, concerns were raised about the negative impact of certain diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) activities on the army's recruiting efforts. One specific example discussed was the use of showers by transgender service members. The army's policy states that soldiers should use facilities based on their gender marker in official records. The congressperson questioned whether this approach promotes cohesive team building and suggested that it may hinder recruitment efforts, particularly among women. The general acknowledged the importance of privacy and creating an environment where everyone can thrive but emphasized the army's focus on building highly trained and disciplined teams. The congressperson expressed concerns about potential sexual harassment and the impact on recruitment, especially in certain regions of the country. The general admitted that such activities may not help recruitment efforts. The hearing concluded with a call for reflection on the potential damage caused by the army's approach to DEI.

The speaker claims "they" wanted to make an example of Garrett O'Boyle and send a message, disregarding his six years of army service, including time with the 101st Airborne and selection for a special unit. According to the speaker, "they" suspended O'Boyle the day he arrived at his new job, preventing his family from accessing their belongings, to send a message. This allegedly occurred because O'Boyle reported the first major mistake of the administration as a whistleblower, specifically regarding the school board issue and the Biden administration's actions. The speaker states that the FBI investigated 25 parents reported via a snitch line but prosecuted none. O'Boyle came forward because he believed the federal snitch line was wrong. The speaker also alleges the FBI, via a memorandum from the Richmond field office, spied on Catholics who are pro-life and pro-family, placing people inside the church to spy on fellow citizens.

Speaker 0 argues that military leadership requires accountability, and a hypothetical regular officer would be terminated for similar actions. Speaker 1 counters that Republicans aren't interested in lectures on military accountability after the Biden administration, claiming the bar for firing a Secretary of Defense is high, even after incidents involving casualties and going AWOL. Speaker 0 states that excusing the behavior is unacceptable. Speaker 1 clarifies that a mistake was made in communications, but operationally, things were handled correctly. Speaker 0 questions why free traffic isn't restored around the Red Sea. Speaker 1 asks why the Houthis are running wild and accuses the previous administration of using the right devices to talk about secrets, while Speaker 0 says the rebels are still harassing ships.

From 2017 until recently, 10,000 soldiers were taught that National Right to Life was a potential domestic terrorist threat and that soldiers with state-issued pro-life license plates were a threat. A general acknowledged the training materials were improperly developed, and the failure was in the lack of oversight and correction. Corrective actions were directed, and responsibility was delegated to the garrison commander. The individual who created the training received corrective training, was retrained as a trainer, and continues to perform. The general would not discuss specific accountability actions, stating it's Army policy not to discuss them. An investigation concluded that soldiers surveyed did not perceive those organizations as terrorist organizations at the end of the training. The 10,000 soldiers have not specifically been told they were misinformed.

After twenty years of service, I was pulled into an officer's office and counseled for posts on my social media. I was told I'm under investigation as a threat to national security. When I asked for proof, they refused, then asked me to return. Today they gave me the proof: anti Israel posts. I joined the military with an allegiance to support The United States Of America; I did not ever take an allegiance to support Israel, but I am deemed a national threat to national security because I do not support Israel and their genocide against the Palestinian people. Yes. You heard that right. I am deemed a threat to national security because I don't support Israel's genocide against the Palestinian people. Since when does not supporting a foreign nation get a US soldier investigated for being a threat to national security?

The speaker was asked about a statement where they said they carried weapons in war despite never deploying to a war zone. The speaker responded that they are proud of their 24 years of service and their record speaks for itself. They speak candidly and passionately, especially about children being shot in schools. When asked if they misspoke about being in war, the speaker said the conversation was about carrying weapons of war after a school shooting, and their grammar isn't always correct. The speaker stated they will never demean another member's service.

A person asked a congresswoman if she would apologize for racist rhetoric inferring that white men should be put on a terror watch list solely based on their skin color. The person asked if she truly thinks white men are the greatest terror threat facing America.

A senator expressed support for the nominee for chairman of the joint chiefs, citing a need for someone focused on national security, not political behavior. The senator criticized General Milley for undermining the commander-in-chief, referencing a call to Pelosi and questioning Trump's mental fitness. The senator asked how the nominee would communicate with congressional leadership, to which the nominee responded that his first duty is to advise the president. The senator stated that Milley wasted nearly 6,000,000 man hours on DEI and woke trainings, and asked what kind of training service members can expect under the nominee's leadership; the nominee responded, "War fighting, lethality, and readiness." The senator also criticized the Afghanistan withdrawal, stating there was no accountability for the deaths at Abbey Gate, and asked if the nominee agreed that officers should be held accountable for military failures; the nominee stated that accountability matters. The senator stated that Milley told his aides that President Trump was preaching, quote, the gospel of the fuhrer, and asked if the nominee agreed that the chairman of the joint chiefs should never disparage the commander in chief; the nominee agreed. The senator asked if the nominee thought it was appropriate for Milley to do interviews regularly with print media, books, documentaries, video on TV, to which the nominee responded that he would spend his time focused on the essential tasks in front of him. Finally, the senator asked if the nominee thought it was appropriate for the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff to warn our greatest adversary what we're when we're about to attack or what we might do; the nominee said no.

So after twenty years of service in the military, yesterday, I got pulled into an officer's office and counseled for posts that I have on my social media. During the counseling, they told me I'm under investigation as a threat to national security. Now I joined when I joined the military, I took an allegiance to support The United States Of America. I did not ever take an allegiance to support Israel. But yet, I am deemed a national a threat to national security because I do not support Israel and their genocide against the Palestinian people. I am deemed a threat to national security because I don't support Israel's genocide against the Palestinian people. Since when does not supporting a foreign nation get a US soldier investigated for being a threat to national security?

Speaker 0 questions the General about the number of white officers in the Air Force, referencing a memo that suggests a reduction of white officers. Speaker 1 explains that the memo is based on application goals and demographic representation. Speaker 0 challenges this, asking about specific percentages for different racial groups. Speaker 1 clarifies that the goal is to provide opportunities for anyone who wants to serve. Speaker 0 criticizes the administration for injecting race-based politics into the military and argues against the use of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies. They express concern about racial quotas and advocate for a merit-based approach. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 questioning the leadership's support for divisive policies.

A woman asked a congresswoman if she would condemn the Hamas flag being flown outside the White House during a free Palestine protest last week. The congresswoman responded, "What are you talking about?" and "That sounds ridiculous." The woman then asked again if the congresswoman would like to condemn it.

The speaker states that military matters should not be approached politically, but that Mark Milley has become a political animal. The speaker claims they would have fired Milley immediately if they had known he spoke with the Chinese in January 2020, assuring them that the U.S. military was under control. The speaker says Milley never informed them about these conversations. The speaker concludes that Milley, along with someone else, should have left after Afghanistan.

A representative questioned General Matlock about the army wrongly telling over 10,000 soldiers that a pro-life license plate could indicate terrorism. The representative asked if anyone was fired, suspended, or demoted as a result. General Matlock stated that personnel actions are the responsibility of the chain of command and did not comment on specific actions taken. The representative expressed dissatisfaction with the response, noting the issue persisted for years. They suggested the Department of Defense demonizes those expressing Christian faith, citing instances in the Navy and Marine Corps. The representative asked who was Chief of Staff of the Army in 2017 when the issue emerged, and was told it was General Milley. The representative stated that the army's lack of transparency regarding consequences undermines deterrence and contributes to recruitment challenges. They called for answers and suggested withholding funds from the Army until the information is provided.