reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker questions if the truth is being hidden again, mentioning a global Microsoft update causing issues. They share a hypothetical scenario involving a friend in India affected by a cyber attack, not an update. The friend mentions a cryptocurrency loss and doubts the information's availability on Google. The speaker expresses skepticism towards media and government transparency, suggesting the truth may surface on TikTok eventually.

The transcript discusses concerns about election irregularities and voting machines. One speaker claims a voting machine subtracted votes, displaying a negative number. Another speaker states that such subtraction cannot occur accidentally and that someone consciously tried to steal votes. A third speaker says that when they press the button next to their name, another person's name appears on the display, questioning the accuracy of the vote count. Another speaker asserts that the machines are working correctly, recording votes accurately, and that the results will be accurate and reliable. One speaker expresses concern about private corporations controlling the voting system and calls for a formal debate about election irregularities, warning that the democracy and republic are at risk.

Polls in Bullhead City, Arizona, at Hope Church in Raymar have been down since 6 o'clock, preventing anyone from voting.

The speaker discusses the Australian Electoral Commission's engagement on online platforms and the issue of political bias. They highlight a tweet from the AEC stating that if someone votes at two different polling places, their votes will be counted. The speaker questions the lack of context and suggests that voter ID systems could prevent multiple voting. They also mention instances of political bias and incompetence within the AEC. The speaker concludes by asking viewers for their opinions on the AEC's engagement on social media.

The speaker discusses a letter from a Michigan sheriff to Congressman Jordan about election fraud. The sheriff has evidence of foreign nationals accessing voting machines and calls for an immediate congressional investigation. The speaker expresses concern that the letter may be ignored, preventing action on the issue.

Speaker 1 questions the accuracy of Elections Canada, suggesting the Tarrabon incident, where an error occurred, is not an isolated event. Speaker 1 expresses doubt that this was the only error of its kind and wants to know the probability of it being a unique occurrence, implying there are likely more errors that have been overlooked or "obsoleted."

I don't understand how it increased by 2% without any change in the numbers. I'll take a screenshot for reference. We'll receive the results for the American vote before the BC votes are counted.

The speaker expresses disbelief that an election could be won by a single vote. They highlight the absurdity of the situation, noting the initial vote count was 44-35 in favor of the liberal party. The speaker finds it bizarre that the election result hinges on one vote. They then mention a woman named Emmanuel, who claims Elections Canada didn't count her vote due to an incorrect address. The speaker questions how, out of all the people in Turbine, Emmanuel, who allegedly voted for the block, was the only one whose vote couldn't be found.

Speaker 0 mentions the possibility of printing out something. Speaker 1 asks if there is an explanation for why certain votes were not counted. Speaker 2 clarifies that there is no concrete explanation for why those votes were not counted by the machine. Speaker 1 confirms that they do not know why the votes were not scanned. Speaker 2 asks if the Dominion Tech guys have figured out the reason, but Speaker 0 says they are not allowed to comment. Speaker 2 asks if it could be a memory card issue, but Speaker 1 and Speaker 0 both say they don't think so. Speaker 0 suggests it could be human error, but they don't have evidence to confirm it. Speaker 2 questions if it could be a software issue, but Speaker 0 avoids speculation. They admit they don't have a definite answer yet. Speaker 2 acknowledges this and thanks them.

A person attempted to vote early, but the scanner was broken. Staff said they would scan the ballot later, after everyone left, and offered to put it in a box. The person declined and said they would return another day.

Independent developers and consultants are monitoring network traffic, observing unusual activities related to a DDoS incident. There’s uncertainty about the status of the BC election site and whether it can be refreshed.

An individual working for Elections Canada in Durham region claims that no votes from that region had been counted when CTV declared the Liberals the winners. The individual's job was to ensure that sealed packages and documentation from polling stations were in order before tabulation. They state that no votes from Pickering, Ajax, Whitby, Oshawa, and Uxbridge had been brought to the office to be counted. The individual questions how CTV and subsequently CBC could declare the Liberals as winners without any votes counted from Durham region. They call for an investigation, stating that something is not right.

I received a text saying I had voted, but I hadn’t. Later, I got another text apologizing for the mistake. This prompted me to go to the polls early. When I arrived and tried to register, they told me I was already marked as having voted. I showed them the texts as proof, but they insisted there was nothing they could do. I have screenshots confirming I did not vote, yet the records say otherwise. I was at work when the supposed vote occurred. I need to know who to contact about this issue, as it feels illegal. TikTok, please don’t remove my video; I have proof of my situation.

I just finished voting, but there was an issue. When I presented my ID, the clerk informed me that their records showed I had requested, received, and returned a mail-in ballot, which I hadn't done. As a result, I had to cast a provisional vote and sign an affidavit stating I never received or returned an absentee ballot. Now, I need to call a number after election day to check if my vote was counted. It makes me wonder how many others faced similar issues, raising questions about the fairness and reliability of the voting system.

An Elections Canada worker in Durham region claims that no votes from that region had been counted when CTV declared the Liberals the winners. The worker's job was to ensure that sealed packages and documentation from polling stations were in order for tabulation. According to the worker, not a single vote package had arrived at the office from Pickering, Ajax, Whitby, Oshawa, or Uxbridge. Following CTV's declaration, CBC also reported the Liberals as winners. The worker believes this situation "reeks" and warrants investigation.

I went to vote and found out someone with my exact name and birthday in the same state has already voted. When they scanned my license, it showed I had voted, but I haven't. My name is unique, and the only difference was the address. This seems strange, especially since I'm not registered to vote, which might explain the issue. Overall, it feels sketchy.

My wife and I went to vote in Morgan County after updating our voter registration. Upon arrival, we found our names missing from the system. Poll workers mentioned they were experiencing significant issues with both new and long-time voters. We were allowed to vote provisionally, but our votes won't be counted for several days. This raises concerns about how this might affect the overall voting process. If this is happening in a small, predominantly red county in Alabama, what issues might be occurring nationwide? Let's discuss.

Speaker 0 asked Speaker 1 to explain what they wanted to get from the board if they had been allowed to continue. Speaker 1 mentioned that since 2019, voters have no way of knowing if their vote was counted properly because they can't read the QR code. Even if the words on the ballot match their vote, the QR code remains unreadable. Speaker 1 believes the board panicked when they were about to discuss this issue.

An individual who was supposed to be working for Elections Canada in Durham region states that no votes from that region had been counted when CTV declared the Liberals the winners. The job entailed ensuring that all packages were sealed and documentation was in order after votes were brought to the office from each polling station, so votes could be tabulated and counted. According to the speaker, not a single vote in Durham region had been brought to the office or counted. The speaker questions how CTV and then CBC could declare the Liberals as winners when votes from a large area east of the GTA, including Pickering, Ajax, Whippy, Oshawa, Uckbridge, and Uxbridge, had not yet been counted. The speaker believes this situation "reeks" and warrants investigation.

Speaker 0 mentions the possibility of printing out something. Speaker 1 asks about the reason for the uncounted votes. Speaker 2 clarifies that there is no concrete explanation for why those votes were not counted by the machine. Speaker 1 confirms that they don't know why the votes didn't get scanned. Speaker 2 asks if the Dominion Tech guys have figured out the reason, but Speaker 0 says they are not allowed to comment. Speaker 2 points out that it hasn't been confirmed if it was a memory card issue. Speaker 1 agrees and suggests it could be human error. Speaker 0 says the ballots didn't transfer over correctly, but they don't have a definite answer yet. Speaker 2 asks if it could be a software issue, but Speaker 0 refuses to speculate. They conclude that they don't have a pinpointed answer at the moment.

Judicial recounts are normal, but the number of seat flips in the 2025 election is unusual. In 2011 there was one flip, in 2015 there were zero, and in 2021 there was one. In 2025, a number of seats have flipped to the Liberal party. This observation is not due to malicious intent or outside influence. The speaker is simply noticing a trend and a flaw. The speaker is calling on Elections Canada to improve voter education or to ensure correct postal codes on mail-in ballots. The speaker feels that the number of flips is weird.

There are numerous reasons why our elections need to be secure. People who dedicate their lives to this cause are often dismissed as conspiracy theorists and technophobes. The vendors responsible for election systems are dishonest about the state of security. This is deeply concerning, and it brings me to tears. As someone I know once said, our country is pretending to be something it's not.

An election candidate is investigating a possible error involving an uncounted or invalid mail-in ballot in the Terrebonne riding. The voter, Emmanuel Gagne, wrote on Facebook that he will keep people updated on the next steps. The voter received an envelope from Elections Canada with an incorrect address label. She mailed in her ballot in early April using the addressed envelope provided by Elections Canada, but it was returned to her as undelivered. Elections Canada says part of the postal code printed on the envelope was wrong and that it's working to gather more facts.

The Spanish version of the White House government website is no longer accessible. The message directing users to the homepage simply states "go home."

An individual working for Elections Canada in Durham region claims that no votes from that region had been counted when CTV declared the Liberals the winners. The individual's job was to ensure that sealed packages and documentation from polling stations were in order before tabulation. They state that no votes from Pickering, Ajax, Whitby, Oshawa, or Uxbridge had arrived at the office. Following CTV's declaration, CBC also reported the Liberals as winners. The individual believes this situation is suspicious and warrants investigation.