reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses concerns about the World Health Organization (WHO) and its potential impact on sovereignty. They suggest that the WHO's One Health approach, which encompasses various aspects of health, could lead to a power and financial grab. The speaker believes that the WHO's efforts are part of a larger puzzle to control critical industries and establish global governance. They mention the possibility of generating fear to gain control and question whether the ability to initiate more pandemics will play a role. The speaker also mentions the UN's Our Common Agenda, which includes changing the financial architecture and promoting electronic money. They conclude by emphasizing the importance of understanding what is happening behind the scenes.

The speaker expresses concerns about the World Health Organization (WHO) and its proposed pandemic treaty. They question the WHO's ability to learn from past mistakes and argue that giving the organization more power could lead to catastrophic errors. The speaker discusses the WHO's structure, funding, and influence, highlighting the role of external sources such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. They criticize the WHO's reliance on private-public partnerships and claim that member states have limited input in decision-making. The speaker also raises concerns about the WHO's ability to define information and determine what is considered settled science. They emphasize the importance of considering the potential costs to democracy and individual freedoms.

The speaker expresses concern about the binding nature of the treaties and the extension of powers to the director general of the WHO. They highlight instances of misconduct within the WHO and criticize the compressed reporting time for public health risks. The speaker argues that these treaties would take away powers from elected representatives and create an unaccountable supranational body. They also raise concerns about the influence of pharmaceutical companies on the WHO and question the organization's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. The speaker emphasizes the importance of individual rights and liberties and suggests that a one-size-fits-all approach may not be effective. They mention the EU's plans to establish a department of misinformation and express skepticism about a single version of the truth. The speaker concludes by calling for careful consideration and reading of the documents.

The speaker discusses the World Health Organization's proposed pandemic treaty, criticizing it as a globalist power grab that undermines national sovereignty. They highlight the failures of lockdowns and praise Florida and Sweden's approach. The government supports the treaty but claims it won't override national policy. The speaker urges people to oppose the treaty, likening it to the UK's entry into the EEC. They advocate for rejecting the treaty and withholding funding from the WHO.

The speaker discusses the power of the World Health Organization (WHO) during a public health emergency or pandemic. They mention that the WHO can declare recommendations and impose various restrictions, such as lockdowns and surveillance. They also highlight the potential requirement for proof of vaccination. The speaker emphasizes that the WHO will have control over health-related information, including the right to censor and interfere in social communication. These provisions are present in the International Health Regulations and the proposed pandemic treaty. The summary concludes by mentioning the importance of discussing these matters.

The speaker discusses the global implementation of measures like mask mandates and testing requirements, following the World Health Organization's (WHO) recommendations. The WHO is set to gain more authority, with member states recognizing it as a coordinating authority. The speaker raises concerns about the WHO's power to command states to enforce lockdowns or vaccine mandates, with countries deploying their police and military against their own citizens. There are discussions about potentially removing human rights and freedoms from the regulations, while an independent advisory committee is created to protect human rights. The goal is to advance the WHO's new world order at the upcoming World Health Assembly, with finalized agreements in a year's time, unless people pressure their governments to stop the plans.

Bill Gates is described as a top donor to the World Health Organization and as calling for virus war games every five years. The transcript claims Canada’s top bureaucrats have committed Canada to “captured” WHO rules that will make this happen, while saying the United States rejected the same power grab last year but Canada accepted it without asking. According to the transcript, nations that accept the amended International Health Regulations (IHR) “are signing over their power in health emergencies” to an unelected international organization that can order “lockdowns, travel restrictions, or any other measures it sees fit.” The transcript adds that the organization “doesn’t even need to declare an emergency,” and that “potential public health risks” are enough to initiate action. The transcript says Canada’s acceptance occurred earlier this month when Governor General Mary Simon authorized Minister of Foreign Affairs Anita Anand to take the actions necessary for Canada to accept IHR amendments adopted in Geneva, Switzerland, on June 1, 2024. It states this was done “without parliamentary debate,” with “no public consultation,” via “an order in council,” while “Canadians are being left in the dark.” The transcript argues that giving the WHO this power should involve “a thorough public debate,” and says the arrangement is not an official treaty. It also claims the process “bypasses the US Senate,” which the transcript describes as playing a role in democratic oversight of major international commitments. The transcript further claims the IHR amendments use “extremely broad language” that gives the WHO unprecedented power. It says countries are required to establish “systems of risk communication” so the WHO can implement unified public messaging globally, describing this as enabling “narrative management and propaganda and censorship” based on what the transcript says was seen during COVID. It alleges the amendments were rushed through in Geneva at the annual World Health Assembly in May 2024 “without a vote,” with only a “loosely defined quorum.” The transcript states the WHO is led by Director General Tedros Gabriese (Tedros Ghebreyesus) and asserts that “pharmaceutical profiteering partners” like Bill Gates and his foundation are involved. It says Tedros praised China’s early pandemic actions and response and promoted the “safe and effective narrative,” and that the changes are characterized as about “cooperation and collaboration.” The transcript claims the IHR amendments “grease the wheels” for faster emergency declarations and more coordination with global actors, reducing Canada’s ability to refuse. It says Parliament “hasn’t even debated this,” provinces are “barely consulted,” and it asserts Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada emphasize global health security while the transcript questions who guards against “global overreach.” The transcript also claims the text confirms military-style virus war games as a core part of meeting IHR obligations, describing “recurring simulation war game exercises” as built into a regular global preparedness cycle. It says this normalizes top-down scenario planning that could shape policy and erode local discretion. The transcript concludes by stating that the next health crisis “won’t be managed from Ottawa” but instead “directed to you from Geneva.” It identifies the speaker as Tamara Ugolini for Rebel News and calls for sharing the information, demanding debate and transparency, and signing a petition at nopandemictreaty.com (nopandemictreaty dot com).

Hello, I'm Dr. Tess Lawrie. The World Health Organization's pandemic agreement is set to be finalized by November 11 and adopted in December. However, the WHO has failed its mission to ensure health for all, and its authority is questionable due to its COVID policies. Consider the WHO as a gang imposing rules on us, demanding compliance and silencing dissent. We have options: comply, plead for change, escape, or confront them. Negotiating with such entities is unlikely to succeed. It's time to inform the WHO that their agreements are irrelevant to us, the people. Thank you.

I am honored to be here with 7 brave citizens launching a European citizens initiative against the globalist agenda. We reject the idea of granting unelected bodies like the WHO governing powers. Democratically elected governments should not be replaced by billionaire-controlled organizations. This goes against the principles of democracy and shows contempt for the people. These 7 citizens and we will not tolerate this power grab. I will expose any government, whether in a member state or elsewhere, that supports this.

The speaker discusses the World Health Organization (WHO) and its current state. They believe that the WHO has lost its way and is attempting to gain power by declaring pandemics and imposing healthcare policies on member nations. The speaker plans to negotiate with the WHO and defund it if necessary. They criticize the WHO for being influenced by China, Davos, the pharmaceutical industry, and the big ag industry. The speaker believes that the WHO should focus on supporting local health clinics, agriculture, economic development, and clean water. They also express concerns about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines, citing a study that shows girls who take the DTP vaccine are more likely to die from other causes. The speaker emphasizes the need for thorough testing and understanding of pharmaceutical products before mandating their use.

The speakers discuss the World Health Organization (WHO) and its connection to powerful corporations like BlackRock and Vanguard. They criticize the WHO for spreading misinformation during the pandemic and accuse it of being funded by private interests, including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. They also mention the WHO's alleged cover-ups and unethical practices. The speakers believe that countries are starting to question their membership in the WHO and the United Nations, and they predict a shift towards closer cooperation between countries and a move away from these organizations. They highlight the dangerous power of the WHO to declare a pandemic and impose lockdowns on countries. The speakers express hope that Ireland, with its referendum mechanism, can become a battleground against the WHO and raise awareness about its problems. They urge President Michael D. Higgins to protect the freedom and sovereignty of the Irish people.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is facing criticism for seeking to extend its powers and control over countries and people's self-determination. The WHO's reform process, initiated after the COVID-19 crisis, aims to bring significant changes that will affect all member states. The organization is pushing for a pandemic treaty that would grant it authority over health decisions, including vaccines, treatments, and restrictions. Critics argue that the WHO has failed in its response to the pandemic and should not be given more power. The treaty, if approved, would be binding and could restrict individual liberties. Citizens are urged to pressure their political representatives to oppose these measures.

The speaker discusses the new pandemic treaty and amendments to the international health regulations proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO). They express concern over the potential impact on countries' sovereignty and people's self-determination. The speaker highlights that these changes will affect everyone and reduce democratic participation. They mention the WHO's claim to absolute leadership in health measures and the power to impose restrictions, lockdowns, and experimental treatments. The speaker also emphasizes the WHO's control over information and the lack of mechanisms to challenge their assessments. They argue that without open debate and different opinions, there can be no science or democracy. The speaker calls for the negotiations to be stopped and urges citizens to pressure their political representatives.

We are gathered here to discuss the World Health Organization and their proposed pandemic treaty. We believe our freedoms are at risk and want to protect our future and democracy. Please read our leaflet and research these institutions to understand the impact on Britain.

The speakers discuss the achievements of the World Health Organization (WHO) in the past two years. They mention that the WHO is passing amendments to international health regulations, which member countries must actively opt out of to avoid accepting them. They express concern about the power given to the WHO's director general during a pandemic, as they can decide what actions to take. The speakers also mention that the definition of a pandemic has been changed, potentially leading to a situation where even a small number of cases in different countries could be classified as a pandemic. This would allow the WHO to seize governing powers of member states.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is facing criticism for seeking to extend its powers and control over countries and people's self-determination. The WHO's reform process, initiated after the COVID-19 crisis, aims to bring significant changes that will affect all 194 member states. They are proposing a pandemic treaty that would give them authority over health decisions and the power to impose restrictions, lockdowns, and experimental treatments. Critics argue that the WHO has failed in the past and should not be granted more power. The treaty is set to be voted on in May 2024, and citizens are urged to pressure their political representatives to oppose it.

An unelected body like WHO, controlled by multibillionaires, should never act in place of a democratically elected government. Any government that supports WHO's power grab is anti-democratic and shows contempt for the people. The speaker vows to expose and name anyone who disrespects democracy, including government officials and parliament members. Elections are coming up, and the people deserve to know who is responsible for abolishing democracy. The speaker, along with seven brave citizens and millions around the world, will fight against WHO every step of the way. They are the majority, and WHO is the minority. They will bring WHO down and won't stop until they succeed. The fight is on.

The WHO has announced a global police force to control and censor opposition. They plan to use medical tyranny to take over and are pushing for a world treaty. The head of WHO, Tedros, openly talks about using disease x for total control. However, people are waking up to their agenda. It is important to expose this for our own survival. On the other hand, Speaker 1 discusses the need for a pandemic agreement to better prepare for future outbreaks. They emphasize the importance of a shared response and hope that member states will deliver this agreement by May 2024. Speaker 2 promotes Infowars as a source of truthful information.

I am honored to be here with 7 brave citizens launching a European citizens initiative against the globalist agenda. We reject the unelected power of organizations like WHO, controlled by billionaires, and demand that democratically elected governments govern. Any government supporting this power grab shows contempt for the people. We will expose those who disrespect democracy and the upcoming elections will hold them accountable. We are millions worldwide fighting against this minority. Brace yourselves, the fight is on. Let's commence.

The World Health Organization is allegedly attempting a global power grab to become a global ministry of health with divisions like the FDA and CDC. The WHO's definition of health encompasses every area of life, including climate, animals, and the environment via "One Health." According to the speaker, the head of the WHO, Tedros Ghebreyesus, considers climate change, racism, and gun violence to be public health emergencies. If these are public health emergencies, every area of life would fall under the WHO's control. The WHO adopted amendments to the international health regulations and intends to push through an international pandemic treaty by the end of the year or May 2025. They will allegedly continue until humanity says no.

As president, it is your duty to protect the health, freedom, and sovereignty of the people. If you want more information on why many people, including myself, have been against the power grabs by the WHO, feel free to reach out to us. Look into the World Council for Health's policy rejecting a monopoly over global public health and the work done by Children's Health Defense. It is important to exercise the right to referendum, otherwise politicians may become irrelevant, not just through the WHO, but also the United Nations. These organizations are seeking authority over global emergency shocks. Politicians need to prioritize the interests and self-determination of the people to maintain their relevance in a democratic country.

The speaker believes that the World Health Organization (WHO) should only serve as a platform for countries to exchange ideas and information, and provide assistance when requested. They argue that the WHO should not have the power to enforce lockdowns or dictate vaccination policies, as it infringes on national sovereignty. The speaker also highlights concerns about the WHO's funding, suggesting a conflict of interest due to significant contributions from private interests, particularly those with pharmaceutical investments. They question the expertise of the WHO and criticize its handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, including its understanding of immunity, mask usage, and the impact of school closures. The speaker concludes that it is illogical to grant more power to the WHO in shaping health policies.

The speaker criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO) for its lack of accountability and the influence of pharmaceutical companies. They argue that proposed regulations would give the WHO more power, including the ability to make binding recommendations and enforce financial contributions from countries for pandemic response. The regulations could also require the sharing of intellectual property, mandate vaccine production and international sharing, and override national safety approval processes. Another speaker highlights the agility of the UK's response to COVID-19 after leaving the European Union and suggests it as a model for the future. The speaker warns that the WHO's powers could include ordering border closures, travel restrictions, contact tracing, forced quarantining, medical examinations, proof of vaccination, and forced medication, even in potential emergencies.

The speaker expresses concern over the World Health Organization's (WHO) proposed new pandemic treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations. They argue that these changes will diminish countries' sovereignty and individuals' rights, erode democratic participation, and grant the WHO excessive power. The speaker highlights the lack of transparency and public debate surrounding these negotiations. They emphasize that the WHO will have authority over health matters, including imposing restrictions, lockdowns, and experimental treatments. The speaker also criticizes the WHO's control over information and the absence of mechanisms to challenge their decisions. They conclude by urging citizens to pressure their political representatives to halt these negotiations.