TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I discovered the source of how ineligible individuals are being added to voter rolls. It's an organization called the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), led by David Becker, who has a controversial background. ERIC, funded by George Soros, contracts with states to access sensitive DMV records protected under privacy laws. Their membership agreement prevents disclosure of citizenship status, allowing them to add names to voter rolls without confirming eligibility. These names are then shared with the Center for Election Innovation and Research, which received significant funding from Zuckerbucks in 2020.

The Obama administration, and even the early Trump administration, used taxpayer money to support the socialist government in Albania. This involved partnering with George Soros on projects aimed at weakening the independence of the Albanian judiciary. This wasn't isolated to Albania; similar activities occurred in Romania, Hungary, Guatemala, and Colombia. Soros, a billionaire, doesn't need this funding, yet the State Department and USAID enabled his influence, allowing him to shape foreign policy and even review funding applications. This taxpayer funding, the speaker argues, indirectly subsidizes Soros’s activities, both domestically and internationally, and is a way for the State Department to oppose conservative agendas. The speaker highlights this as an example of the government funding groups that oppose American interests, while right-leaning organizations are largely ignored. Legal action was necessary to obtain the documents revealing these activities.

The speaker asserts that emails repeatedly referenced Comet Ping Pong, a Washington DC pizza place run by James Alifontis (the speaker refuses to call him a man). Alifontis is described as a local pizza shop owner, art gallery owner, and founder of several other restaurants, but the speaker argues this is only a surface description. The speaker highlights alleged connections: Alifontis allegedly has powerful friends, evidenced by Instagram posts showing personal letters from Hillary Clinton, campaign rally photos, and Obama supposedly playing ping pong with a child. The speaker claims there are photos of Alifontis with Podesta, including one where Alifontis holds a pizza pool floaty with a creepy silhouette of a female behind them. The speaker describes an archive of Alifontis’s Instagram, claimed to include p*rnographic images and adults with pizza covering their genitals, as well as disturbing photos of children, including a blurred image of a five-year-old girl allegedly his niece with her hands taped to a ping pong table, captioned “chickenlover.” The speaker questions why Alifontis wasn’t banned from Instagram and notes that Alifontis is supposedly close to many people tied to the emails. The pizza shop is presented as central to a broader network of alleged wrongdoing, and the speaker argues there are non-coincidental links among the people involved. The speaker notes Alifontis’s Instagram shows a statue of Antinous, described as Hadrian’s lover who was a boy, with a history of a relationship from preteen to death at 18 or 19, and claims Hadrian created a cult around Antinous after his death. The speaker connects this to alleged child exploitation and questions the profile-picture choice in relation to those involved. They compare Epstein to Alifontis, pointing to child imagery, connections to powerful people, and wealth. The discussion shifts to a 2012 GQ list of the 50 most powerful people in Washington, where the speaker claims Alifontis appears at number 49, implying influence beyond a small business footprint. The speaker then asserts a well-known romantic connection between Alifontis and David Brock, founder of Media Matters, a left-leaning watchdog group. Media Matters is described as monitoring right-leaning media, producing content to counter narratives, and allegedly influencing which news is considered legitimate. The speaker mentions that Media Matters has faced defamation lawsuits and investigations for fraudulent activity, including being sued by the Texas attorney general and the Missouri attorney general, and notes funding from George Soros and Bill Clinton, who allegedly provided office space at the Center for American Progress, a think tank associated with John Podesta. The cycle of connections is described as widening to include Hillary Clinton, the Podestas, and others, forming a circle of familiar faces tied to the emails and to Alifontis. The speaker argues that Alifontis posts images of selling children on his Instagram and connects this to the Comet Ping Pong restaurant, suggesting a broader pattern of wrongdoing. Back at the venue, the speaker cites FBI imagery and symbols appearing in Comet Ping Pong materials, including two ping pong paddles on the menus that resemble the “child lover” image from the FBI’s alerts. Murals at Comet Ping Pong allegedly depict adults, some unclothed, parading children or heads of children, and one humanoid figure wearing a crown. The bathrooms allegedly contain graphic graffiti, and the musical acts Heavy Breathing and Xtains are described as featuring disturbing imagery, including a scene in Heavy Breathing’s video that includes dialogue suggesting someone named Bram72 and a character named MajesticApe29; MajesticApe is rumored to be James Alifontis. A band named Stains is described as having a song with imagery akin to MK Ultra nightmares, and a box in the video reportedly mirrors the FBI’s “boy lover” symbol. The speaker references an online video from 2007 titled Ping Pong in a Public Place showing two men playing ping pong, with disturbing audio of a child begging for help, implying missing children may be connected to the location. The speaker notes nearby establishments—Besta Pizza and Beyond Borders Across the Street—whose logos allegedly resemble FBI symbols, further claiming a pattern of coincidences. The discussion shifts to a rumored server hosted in a backroom on the Comet Ping Pong site, with encrypted video files and password-protected pages discovered after the gate broke, suggesting that someone is actively keeping content hidden. In summary, the speaker contends that Comet Ping Pong, James Alifontis, and a network of powerful political and media figures form a troubling web tied to alleged child exploitation, with imagery, music, and online content serving as corroborating indicators, while asserting that a backroom server allegedly hosted encrypted videos connected to the venue.

The president's chief of staff, Ron Klain, and other members of the administration have ties to dark money groups, which are fundraising organizations that don't disclose their donors. One of these groups is led by former top aide Hillary Clinton. Dark money has watchdog groups concerned about its impact on politics. Klain previously served on the board for the Center For American Progress, an organization linked to dark money. During the 2020 campaign, President Biden vowed to fight the influence of dark money.

Nicole Shanahan and Harmeet Dhillon discuss a broad critique of how culture, law, and politics are shaping America today, focusing on cancel culture, political power, and the fight over election integrity, free speech, and American ideals. - On cancel culture and authenticity: The conversation opens with a claim that pursuing political or cultural conformity reduces genuine individuality, with examples of how people are judged or pressured to parroting “woke” messaging. They argue that this dynamic reduces people to boxes—race, gender, or immigrant status—rather than evaluating merit or character, and they describe a climate in which disagreement is met with denunciation rather than dialogue. They stress the importance of being able to be oneself and to engage across differences without being canceled. - Personal backgrounds and the RNC moment: Nicole Shanahan describes an impression of Harmeet Dhillon speaking at the RNC, highlighting the sense of inclusion across faiths, races, and women in the party. Dhillon emphasizes that this is not about a monolith “white Christian nationalist” stereotype, recounting her own experiences from Dartmouth, where she encountered hostility to stereotypes and where merit-based evaluation (writing, argumentation) defined advancement rather than identity. - Experiences with California and liberal intolerance: Dhillon notes a pervasive intolerance in California toward dissent on topics like religious liberty and climate justice, describing a glass ceiling in big law for pro-liberty work and a culture of signaling rather than substantive engagement. Shanahan adds that moving away from the Democratic Party to independence has induced personal and professional consequences, such as colleagues asking to be removed from her website due to investor concerns, reflecting broader fears about association in liberal enclaves. - Diversity, identity, and national identity: They contrast the freedom to define oneself with the coercive “bucket” approach to identity. They argue that outside liberal coastal enclaves, people feel freer to articulate individual identities and values, while California’s increasingly prescriptive DEI training is criticized as artificial and limiting. - The state of discourse and the danger of intellectual conformity: The speakers warn of a culture where questioning past work or adopting new ideas triggers denouncement and self-censorship. They cite anecdotal experiences—loss of board members, fundraising constraints, and professional risk for those who diverge from prevailing views—claiming this suppresses valuable work in fields such as climate science, criminal justice reform, and energy policy. - Reform efforts and the political landscape: They discuss the clash between incremental, evidence-based policy and a disruptive, progressivist impulse. Shanahan describes attempts to fix infrastructure of the criminal justice system through technology and data (e.g., Recidiviz) that were undermined by political dynamics. They emphasize the importance of practical, measured reform and cross-partisan cooperation, the need to focus on American integrity and governance, and the risks of pursuing “disruption” as an end in itself. - Election integrity and lawfare: A central theme is concern about how elections are conducted and contested. Dhillon outlines a view of targeted irregularities in swing counties and cites concerns about ballot counting, observation, and legal rulings. She argues that left-wing funders have built a sophisticated, twenty-year, lawfare apparatus, using nonprofits and strategic lawsuits to influence outcomes, notably pointing to the Georgia ballot-transfer activities funded by Mark Zuckerberg and his wife. She asserts that there is a broader pattern of using C3s and C4s to push political objectives while leveraging the law to contest elections. - The role of money and influence: They discuss the influence of wealthy donors, political consultants, and media in shaping party dynamics, suggesting Republicans should invest more in district attorney races, state-level prosecutions, and Supreme Court races to counterbalance the left’s long-running investment in the electoral apparatus and litigation strategy. They acknowledge that big donors and activist networks can coordinate to advance policy goals, sometimes at the expense of on-the-ground, local accountability. - Tech, media, and corporate power: The dialogue covers the Silicon Valley environment, James Damore’s case at Google, and the broader issue of woke corporate culture. Dhillon highlights the disproportionate power of HR in big tech and how employee activism around identity politics can influence careers and policy. Shanahan notes that Google’s founders are no longer central decision-makers, and argues for antitrust and shareholder-rights actions to challenge what they see as woke monopolies that do not serve shareholders or society. - The path forward: Both speakers advocate for courage to cross party lines, work for principled governance, and engage in issue-focused collaboration. They emphasize the need to reform infrastructure—electoral, health, educational, and economic—through competency, transparency, and bipartisan cooperation, rather than through dogmatic, identity-driven politics. They close with a mutual commitment to continuing the conversation, finding common ground where possible, and preserving the core American ideal that individuals should be free to define themselves and contribute to the country’s future.

Resistance strategies are evolving, focusing on three main areas: judicial influence, NGO activism, and state-level actions by Democratic governors. Key players like the Democracy Alliance, backed by prominent left-wing billionaires, are strategizing on issues like abortion rights and immigration. They are also planning new dark money organizations to combat disinformation, targeting figures like Elon Musk. The legal side is represented by Democracy Forward, which has a significant war chest and is prepared to file lawsuits against the Trump administration. Additionally, groups like Indivisible are mobilizing grassroots efforts to challenge Republican policies. The Democratic National Committee is also gearing up to counter Trump nominees with opposition research. Overall, the resistance is well-organized and poised to be more powerful than in previous years.

Kamala Harris follows a man named John Della on Instagram, who the speaker believes may be a "puppet master" behind the Democratic agenda. Della has made traceable donations to the Democrats and is on the board of Google, which the speaker claims has been active in censorship. Della was also an early investor in Twitter and active in decision-making during Jack Dorsey's ownership. He is involved with Bono's One Organization and Bill Gates' The Pledge. Della is also involved with Forward.us alongside Zuckerberg, which the speaker says is aimed at fast-tracking citizenship for immigrants in the U.S., and some of its rhetoric is alarming.

The left uses NGOs to influence elections and reshape American culture, often funded by taxpayers. Each dot represents an NGO linked to the Chinese Progressive Association, which has funded various organizations like the Black Voters Matter Fund and the National Domestic Workers Alliance. These groups, in turn, support others such as the Fair Work Center and LGBTQ Alleyship. This network reveals how taxpayer money is funneled into leftist activities. The Chinese Progressive Association receives funding from major institutions like the San Francisco Foundation and Vanguard Charitable Endowment. Recent advancements in technology now allow for detailed tracking of financial flows between these NGOs, revealing connections and directors across multiple organizations. This information will be made available on the website.

Mike Benz outlines a conspiracy tied to the Transition Integrity Project (TIP) and a June 2020 war game that purportedly sought “a way to use riots, nationwide riots, and do favors to the Black Lives Matter movement so that they would owe them favors back to take to the streets against Trump if Trump won the election fair and square,” while also needing “a robust, intentional, and specific strategy to go after the networks that enabled Trump's rise to power” so they could be jailed after Trump left office. Bubba Boyd, who has written about the event since August 2020, explains that the discussion will cover the key players in TIP, the plan to subvert the 2020 election, how rigging the election and four prosecutions of Trump flow from the June 2020 conspirators’ meeting, and excerpts from a January 2020 Donald Trump speech to the World Economic Forum that allegedly signals why Trump and Trumpism had to be eliminated. The publicly named sponsors of the war game are Rosa Brooks and Niles Gilman of the Berggruen Institute in Los Angeles, described as the “globalist home of Silicon Valley’s anti-Trump billionaires,” with branches in Venice and Beijing and a China branch in direct dialogue with Xi Jinping. Michael Anton is cited as the author of a Trump national security document who criticized TIP’s war game, stating they were planning a coup against the election and publicizing the war game to normalize the idea. Brooks’s background is summarized as a lawyer for George Shullis at the Open Society Institute, then a State Department attorney for regime change, then a Pentagon policy lawyer under Obama, while teaching at Georgetown Law. The narrative asserts she advocated impeaching Trump and a potential 25th Amendment move, and even a military coup, in a 2017 Foreign Policy piece titled “three ways to get rid of president Trump before 2020,” including the sentence: “For the first time in my life, I can imagine plausible scenarios in which senior military officers might simply tell the president, no, sir. We’re not doing that.” The claim is that she “couldn’t wait to launch a coup against Trump,” a portrayal attributed to a New York Times editorial response. In June 2020, Brooks and Gilman allegedly convened TIP’s war game about the 2020 election and its possible aftermath, with over 100 participants and 76 role players drawn from former Pentagon officials, the intelligence community, Silicon Valley, Wall Street, the media, and Republican and Democratic institutions. Names publicly associated with anti-Trump activity are listed, including John Podesta, Donna Brazile, Bill Kristol, Michael Steele, Jennifer Granholm, and other unnamed figures, all described as major players in attempts to nullify the 2016 election and overthrow the government. Benz is said to detail the TIP war games and concludes that to prevent a second Trump term, Biden would need a large victory margin to overcome fraud perceptions, with the insurrectionist scenario calling for control of the military, Black Lives Matter, and other street rioters. The narrative asserts that BLM raised about 90 million in 2020 with donors like the Democracy Alliance and the Ford Foundation, and that Mark Elias led financial filings associated with the effort. The discussion further cites Defense One articles from August 2020 that reportedly called for a military coup and a subsequent open debate within the military about accepting orders, and claims that Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley “was not about to obey any order from the president.” The appendix to TIP’s report allegedly debated criminally proceeding against Trump after leaving office and wiping out his “white supremacist and extremist base,” with a quote describing the need for a strategy to challenge networks that enabled Trump’s rise and remained “imbecible to the kind of pluralist democracy the founders intended,” implying a path toward removing Trump’s influence even after his presidency. The transcript also notes contemporary references to Arctic Frost, an FBI investigation linked to 2022 midterms, and alleged targeting of Republican election operations and other figures by the FBI. Excerpts from Trump’s World Economic Forum address and a January 2020 speech are presented to illustrate a moral and strategic framing against globalism and “radical socialists.” The presentation ends by inviting audience support and promoting further engagement, including a free newsletter.

I am Peter Flaherty, chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center. The company should have an independent chair to avoid being associated with Warren Buffet's political activities. The Gates Foundation, funded by Buffet, promotes critical race theory and claims that math is inherently racist. They also offer a gender identity toolbox that falsely states gender is a social construct. Bill Gates has been linked to Jeffrey Epstein, despite Epstein's conviction. The Gates Foundation is a major donor to the dark money machine called Maribel. They also support various causes, including troops and American cities.

"We've been able to, like, have, injunctions that, like, stop, you know, deportation flights and other types of things." "Qian Bahad admitted their caucus has secured injunctions that literally halt deportation flights while also stating that people need to pressure their local governments to not cooperate with the feds." "Last month, their undercover cameras caught Santiago Mouquet, a director at the Vera Institute, admitting the group tracks ICE movements and pushes that information out so illegal immigrants can dodge enforcement." "He also bragged about major donors, Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, and others." "The Vera Institute isn’t just help illegal immigrants evade ICE. They funnel money into radical causes like Black Lives Matter." "A widespread coordinated effort is currently happening right now to undermine federal law enforcement, slow down the deportation efforts."

Kamala Harris follows a man named John Dower on Instagram, who the speaker believes could be one of the puppet masters behind the Democratic agenda. Dower is on the board of Google, which the speaker claims has been active in censorship, and was an early investor in Twitter, active in decision-making during Dorsey's ownership. He is also involved with Bono's One Organization and Bill Gates' The Pledge. Dower co-founded forward.us with Zuckerberg, which the speaker says aims to fast-track citizenship for immigrants in the U.S., with some alarming rhetoric.

A Free Press report reveals that the "Trump resistance" is bankrolled by wealthy individuals. The organization "Families Over Billionaires," which opposes Republican tax cuts, doesn't accept public donations and is a trade name for Arabella Advisors, a dark money network. Arabella Advisors is funded by billionaires like Bill Gates, Reid Hoffman, Pierre Omidar, and George Soros. These organizations are structured within the Arabella network, obscuring the donors' identities. Such setups raise transparency concerns. "Families Over Billionaires" is staffed by former Biden and Harris officials, including director Michael Linden, previously with Biden's Office of Management and Budget. Currently, the organization is releasing YouTube advertisements featuring paid actors expressing concerns about tax cuts. While this doesn't discredit the organization's message, it's important to know that groups calling themselves grassroots may not be.

I've discovered how ineligible voters are being added to voter rolls. The source is the Electronic Registration Information Center, or ERIC, led by David Becker. Becker was involved in a scandal as a US attorney, worked for the far-left organization People for the American Way, and then Pew. With funding from George Soros, Becker created ERIC. ERIC contracts with states to access DMV records, which are normally protected. They use this data to identify unregistered individuals but the agreement prohibits states from telling ERIC who is or isn't a citizen. ERIC then puts these names on voter rolls and shares the data with the Center for Election Innovation and Research, the group that received Zuckerbucks in 2020.

Speaker 0: I want to ask about what if you've changed position on what happened in the twenty twenty election. Speaker 1: Oh, I think it was rigged. Speaker 0: You think it was rigged? Speaker 1: Yeah. I know more now than I did then. What you'd have to do is in February 2021, was a Time Magazine article that was published, it was about Mark Zuckerberg investing $500,000,000 in a get out the Democrat vote campaign. And they focused on the swing states, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona. And they focused in what they did is they basically did what I would refer to as agency capture. And they went in and they captured the, the county clerks and the secretaries of states in these states. They basically said, we have a get out the vote campaign program, and if you will implement it exactly the way that we say that you must implement it, we will give you massive amounts of money to run your elections. But if you do not run it the way that we say, then we can claw all that money back. Well, think about it. If you're a small county in Wisconsin and you get $300,000 from Mark Zuckerberg's foundation to make sure that there are drop boxes in your, in your Democrat heavy areas, that there are, that you've got a, an RV going around and hauling people into the, into the polling places to vote. When you do that, if, if you do not carry out, you take that money, you sign that contract and you do not do exactly what that foundation said, you were gonna have to use public money to pay it back. You most likely would have ended up in prison. I mean, that's just one example of the way that the election was rigged. The Mark Zuckerberg money was huge. $500,000,000 concentrated in Democrat counties for the purpose of getting out the Democrat vote. Speaker 0: How do you know it was to get the Democrat vote out? Because how does exactly do what are the mechanics of that? Of how it was You Speaker 1: I have to read the article. And what the article does is it lays it out, and the title is something along the lines of how a secret group of people were able to save the twenty twenty election, meaning how were they able to get Joe Biden elected.

In light of RFK's upcoming confirmation hearings, a letter claiming to have 17,000 doctors urging the Senate to reject his nomination has surfaced. Upon investigation, it turns out anyone can sign this letter multiple times, raising suspicions about its credibility. The Committee to Protect Health Care, which organized the letter, claims not to accept donations from pharmaceutical companies, yet is funded by the Arabella Advisors network, a dark money organization that manages over $1 billion. This network's practices, including astroturfing, create the illusion of grassroots support while keeping donor identities anonymous. The situation highlights concerns about transparency and the influence of undisclosed funding on public health narratives.

A journalist asks if there’s someone who can be spoken to about hearing, and is directed to the other side of the park. The exchange turns into a broader set of allegations about a man named Naftali Aaron Kranz and the organization Get Free. The speaker claims Naftali Kranz is a paid protester through Get Free. They present LinkedIn posts recruiting for paid protesters for the company, described as Get Free’s “part time mobilization support contractor.” The speaker asserts Get Free bills itself as a grassroots organization while Naftali and others are allegedly paid to protest. They claim Get Free aims to “undo white supremacy” and that one of the best ways to do that, in Naftali’s view, is to celebrate vandalism, citing Crown Heights, where someone threw an egg at a stranger’s cyber truck and placed dog feces on it. The speaker contends Naftali attended an abolish the police rally but was not the leader, instead blending in among other recruits, and that he works with the DSA, explaining why the speaker met him at a DSA Tax the Rich rally. On LinkedIn, the speaker says Naftali frequently posts about paid protester roles, urging people to join to “help us expand our effort to win reparations across the country,” with recruitment across Chicago, the Bay Area, and Baltimore. They describe a nine-week contract, part-time, paying $3,400 in stipends biweekly, seeking someone excited about experimentation who will recruit people and train them to drive turnout at events. The speaker also says Naftali is part of Jews Against Trump and urges donations to bail funds to “bail immigrants out of concentration camps,” adding a claim that a Jewish person who calls an immigration detention center a concentration camp has a serious mental illness, and criticizing colleges like NYU, the Democrat party, and mainstream media as brainwashing. The speaker asserts Nicole Cardi is at the top of the Get Free Movement and claims she says the George Floyd protests were the reason Biden won the 2020 election. They argue that protest NGO groups are about getting Democrats elected, and that donations to Get Free are funneled through ActBlue, which the speaker says is under investigation by the Department of Justice for foreign contributions. The speaker alleges ActBlue has funneled billions to activist groups like Indivisible Twin Cities, which is said to be orchestrating resistance to ICE agents in Minneapolis. Indivisible is claimed to have paid protesters and received over 7,600,000 dollars from the Open Society Foundation, funded by George Soros.

Fake NGOs are often fake charities, mostly run by Democrats, though Republicans may be involved to maintain silence. Billions of dollars are given to these Democrat-run NGOs, which then go through a network of additional NGOs. This is described as a giant money laundering scheme, where the terms NGO and money laundering are almost synonymous. Arrests are needed in this regard.

The MAGA movement is ascendant. Mark Zuckerberg, a major offender, is trying to infiltrate our movement. Last week, I showed how Zuckerberg funneled money to groups tied to lawsuits via a Twitter thread. The Chan Zuckerberg initiative has since altered its website, removing grants prior to 2024, conveniently erasing their actions to influence the 2020 election. Zuckerberg's Forward US, founded in 2013, along with the Chan Zuckerberg initiative, funds over a dozen organizations actively resisting President Trump through lawsuits, lobbying, protests, and more. Examples include Casa, suing over birthright citizenship; Make the Road New York, aiding illegal aliens in avoiding deportation; Vote Vets Action, opposing HECSAF confirmation; and the Center for American Progress, initiating numerous lawsuits. Even radical groups like the Black Alliance for Just Immigration, which smeared the Lake and Riley act, receive funding.

I'm definitely not buying Mark Zuckerberg's supposed MAGA conversion. After I posted a Twitter thread linking a group he donated to with organizations that are actively sabotaging Trump's agenda, Meta ran to the New York Times to smear me. Their defense was basically, "We gave money, but don't know what they did with it." Digging deeper, I found over a dozen organizations funded by Zuckerberg that are suing Trump and organizing protests against his policies. Zuckerberg hasn't publicly stated any intention to withdraw funds from these groups. He issued a letter apologizing for their impact on the 2020 election, but provided no evidence. The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative website, which previously listed thousands of grants to left-wing organizations, now only shows grants from 2024 onward, conveniently erasing the record of election interference.

Susan Spalding, a former senior advisor at the Centers For Strategic International Studies, believed that Russia not only interfered in the 2016 election but also aimed to undermine the American people's faith in the judicial system. She partnered with the CIA to hold a conference for justices across the country. The organization she worked for, the Centers For Strategic and International Studies, is a nonprofit funded by various governments and influential individuals such as George Soros and the Koch Brothers. The board of directors includes former government officials and influential figures from various industries. These individuals, with their own ideologies and policies, aim to control and exert power over the rest of society.

Dominion, a key player in vote tabulation, received a $400 million investment from Credit Suisse, a Chinese bank, just weeks before the election. Another company, Seidel, which recently declared bankruptcy, had its assets acquired by a new entity with ties to George Soros and Venezuela. Additionally, Kamala Harris' husband is linked to one of these companies. The software used for elections originates from Hugo Chavez's Venezuela, while the machinery and tabulation services are connected to Venezuelan and Chinese interests. This raises concerns about foreign influence in the election process, suggesting a potential manipulation of our electoral system.

We were covering an article about 55,000 Democrat NGOs discovered to be contributing to campaigns, moving things around, and pushing propaganda. It was discovered through AI that to figure out where the money's coming from, you have to go through layers and layers, and it's all funneling down to one group or another. It's a giant propaganda machine, a giant regime change machine.

The speaker claims Scott Pressler's father is a retired Navy captain working with Michelle Flournoy's husband. Flournoy is linked to WestExec, CNAS, Booz Allen Hamilton, and the Carlyle Group, which has a stake in Dominion Voting Systems. Flournoy's brother is allegedly a Chinese spy involved with Tumisomo Bank and SoftBank, an early investor in Alibaba, which obtained US voter registration data. The speaker alleges that ERIC voter registration data was sent to Beijing, China, and that the Center for Election Integrity and Research (CEIR), which administers ERIC, defends corrupt elections officials. WestExec helped establish the relationship with Alibaba, Tencent, and Huawei for election fraud. Robert Pressler allegedly works with Flournoy. The speaker claims that during Carrie Lake's election lawsuit, Maricopa's elections network was illegally accessed, with the hack originating in Kansas. Thomas Liddy, son of G. Gordon Liddy, stopped the trial. Michael Salim from Rackspace and Data Republican, Jenna aka Jenica Pounds, are allegedly involved. Pounds, formerly with Snapchat, partnered with CEIR to allow voter registration on social channels using compromised data. The speaker alleges ActBlue is a subsidiary in the arena domain, used to defraud elections. Columbia University and Michael Crow of In-Q-Tel are also implicated. Scott Pressler is accused of ignoring the data/cyber side of election fraud. WinRed and ActBlue are two sides of the same coin. WinRed was allegedly hacked from British Columbia.