reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Woody Harrelson's SNL monologue sparked controversy. The movie plot involves drug cartels controlling media and politicians, forcing people to stay home unless they take drugs. The idea was deemed too outlandish. Critics labeled Harrelson as anti-vaxx or a stoner. The media's reaction to his joke about buying media was seen as ironic.

Speaker 0 raises the question of CIA involvement in drug trafficking, referencing a past discussion with former Tel Aviv CIA chief of station Susan Miller and noting a reminder about Iran-Contra. They ask why the CIA would be intimately involved with drug trafficking, and mention Candace Owens discussing it in relation to the Charlie Kirk assassination. Speaker 1 answers that trafficking in drugs allows the CIA to get closer to the targets they want to reach. They point to a popular Netflix series, Narcos, which follows the hunt for Pablo Escobar, the Cali cartel, and other major cartels. They claim that, in the show, and in real life, every time the Drug Enforcement Administration gets close to its primary target, the CIA station chief steps in and ruins the investigation. They state that this happens because the CIA doesn’t care about drugs. Speaker 1 continues that the CIA cares about terrorism and communism, implying there are always some other bigger ideological concerns. Therefore, the CIA is “perfectly happy” to allow cocaine to flood into the United States in the 1980s during the Iran-Contra period, just as it was “perfectly happy” to allow Afghanistan to provide 93% of the world’s heroin once the United States began its occupation of Afghanistan.

'The biggest drug cartels in the world get together and buy up all the media and all the politicians and force all the people in the world to stay locked in their homes, and people can only come out if they take the cartel's drugs and keep taking them over and over.' This describes a movie concept in which cartels unite to control media and politicians to force global lockdowns via drug dependence. 'I threw the script away.' 'I mean, who is gonna believe that crazy idea?' The speaker presents this premise as the movie concept, followed by remarks. The remarks reflect the speaker's reaction.

The speaker states they decided to break the system, referring to drug companies, which they describe as the most powerful lobby in the world. They claim drug companies have tremendous power over the Senate, the House, governors, and everybody. The speaker notes that drug companies spend billions of dollars. Despite this, the speaker says they don't care and must do what's right.

In the movie, the plot revolves around the largest drug cartels joining forces to purchase the media and politicians. They continue to dominate the drug trade while evading suspicion. The speaker finds this idea absurd and questions who would believe such a far-fetched concept.

Stanley Kubrick's last movie, Eyes Wide Shut, allegedly led to his assassination because it depicted the secret lives of wealthy elites. The film purportedly reveals their involvement in sacrifices, murder, rape, pornography, and killing, all hidden behind a facade of respectability. According to the speaker, these elites appear important and well-dressed but are secretly murderous. The movie's title, Eyes Wide Shut, reflects America's ignorance towards these leaders, be they political or religious.

Woody Harrelson delivered a monologue on SNL about a movie plot where major drug cartels control the media and politicians, forcing people to stay home unless they take the cartels' drugs repeatedly. He dismissed the script as unbelievable. Following his performance, media outlets launched attacks labeling him an anti-vaxxer and a stoner. His joke about the cartels buying the media was met with a response that seemed to confirm his point, highlighting the irony of the situation.

The speaker describes a movie plot: Drug cartels unite to buy media and politicians, forcing global lockdowns. People can only leave their homes if they take the cartels' drugs repeatedly. The speaker rejected the script, deeming the idea unbelievable.

The speaker asserts that cartels are running Mexico and expresses that it is very sad to watch what has happened to the country. They claim that the cartels are killing about 250,000 to 300,000 people in our country every single year, mentioning drugs as part of the issue.

Speaker 0 says that 85% of the international narcotrafficking annually, "the 85 por 100 de los 1000 de 1000 de 1000000," is in the banks of the United States, and that the cartel should be investigated to uncover money laundering. They mention looking at fiscal permission data from the vice president, stating that there are more than $500,000,000,000 (five hundred billion) dollars annually in US banks, in legal banks. If they want to investigate a cartel, they should investigate the cartel of the north, because from the United States it directs all narcotrafficking of South America and of the world, and also directs the trafficking of opioids, etc. The speaker concludes that in the United States are the mafias, the true cartels.

Speaker 0 asks about how common it is for the CIA to use drugs as a weapon or to create cartels for various purposes, and whether it sometimes works as a strategy. Speaker 1 responds that it continues to this day, with key US allies implicated in the drug trade. The Organization for Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, funded by the State Department, is described as an investigative journalist outlet that has a new report about the Noboa family’s ties to the Balkan mafia. The Noboa family controls Ecuador; Daniel Noboa, born in Miami, is the president, and his family owns a Noboa shipping company. The shipping company is alleged to have been involved in sending bananas through the Noboa Bonita Fruit Company packed with cocaine to Europe via routes overseen by the Balkan Mafia. Ecuador is described as the largest drug export center to the United States, per the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, while Venezuela is claimed to be responsible for about 5% of drug transit. Kristi Noem, identified as the DHS secretary, is said to have visited Ecuador to meet with Daniel Noboa and campaign for a referendum to bring US military bases back to Ecuador, a referendum that was rejected by Ecuadorians. Noboa is portrayed as strategically valuable to the US, described as friendly with Marco Rubio, who has touted him as a partner in the war on drugs, yet the claim is made that the issue is about geostrategic interests. Noboa is said to have ended the legacy of social democrat Rafael Correa and is purportedly supporting US military bases on Ecuadorian soil, aligning with US interests even as Ecuador becomes a center of narco-trafficking and cartels destabilize parts of the country. In Mexico, the narrative references Vicente Fox and Felipe Calderón, noting Calderón as author of Plan Mérida, a US military-directed program to combat drugs in Mexico. Gennaro García Luna, head of Mexico’s equivalent of the FBI, is described as now in a US federal prison for life for involvement in a conspiracy with the Sinaloa cartel to ship drugs to the United States. The State Department is said to have acknowledged knowing about Luna’s activities while valuing him as a political partner. The Fast and Furious program is mentioned, alleging that the US armed Mexican cartels to track guns, and a 2011 federal court testimony by a Chapo Guzmán lieutenant claimed the US armed the Sinaloa cartel to defeat rivals like the Guadalajara cartel. A recent raid in Oakton, Northern Virginia, on Paul Campo, former director of the DEA’s financial division, is described. Campo was in charge of money laundering investigations and was associated with a CIA asset named Robert Sensi to launder $12,000,000 for the Jalisco New Generation Cartel. The speaker notes ongoing exploration of these connections. Historically, the CIA is said to have worked with narco cartels to fund black operations, funding proxy wars in Central America with off-the-books money. The Guadalajara cartel allegedly funded the Nicaraguan Contras through cartel profits. Enrique “Kiki” Camarena, a DEA agent, reportedly discovered the Guadalajara cartel’s involvement in black operations and was captured and tortured, with alleged monitoring by CIA operatives including Felix Rodríguez, who supervised the capture of Che Guevara. This is tied to a documentary on Amazon called The Last NARC.

The speaker describes a movie plot: Drug cartels unite to buy media and politicians, forcing global lockdowns. People can only leave their homes if they take the cartels' drugs repeatedly. The speaker rejected the script, deeming the idea unbelievable.

In the movie, the plot revolves around the largest drug cartels in the world. These cartels acquire control over the media, politicians, and their own drugs, repeatedly taking them. However, the speaker dismisses this idea as too absurd and throws away the script, doubting anyone would believe it.

The speaker describes a movie plot: Drug cartels unite to buy media and politicians, forcing global lockdowns. People can only leave their homes if they take the cartels' drugs repeatedly. The speaker rejected the script, deeming the idea unbelievable.

This message is for the cartel. The speaker claims they didn't ask for any problems and were a fan of the cartel's products in their twenties. The speaker suggests the cartel break the rules and get high on their own supply. They claim the man the cartel is looking for lives at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington DC, and suggest the cartel pay him a visit.

Stanley Kubrick's last movie, Eyes Wide Shut, allegedly led to his assassination because it exposed the secret lives of wealthy elites. The film depicts their involvement in blood sacrifices, murder, rape, pornography, and killing, all hidden behind a facade of respectability. These elites appear as important figures in nice suits, but are murderous behind the scenes. The title, Eyes Wide Shut, refers to the American public's ignorance towards the true nature of politicians and religious leaders, who are essentially the same. The speaker urges viewers to watch the movie.

I think the most unexpected group of people might end up saving us all. Do you know who Trump is trying to declare war on? The cartel. Oh, please, do it.

Speaker 0: Have you considered talking to the president of Colombia who you called a drop leader? Speaker 1: No. I haven't really thought too much about him. He's been fairly hostile to The United States, and I haven't given him a lot of thought. He's he's gonna have himself some big problems if he doesn't wise up. Speaker 2: Did you say Colombia is producing a lot of drugs. Have cocaine factories that they make cocaine, as you know, and they sell it right into The United States. So he better wise up or he'll be next. He'll be next too. I hope he's listening. Speaker 0: So was this operation a message that you're sending to Mexico, to Claudia Scheinbaum, president there? Speaker 2: Well, it wasn't meant to be. We're very friendly with her. She's a good woman, but the cartels are running Mexico. She's not running Mexico. The cartels are running Mexico. We could be politically correct and be nice and say, oh, yes. Is no. No. She's very, you know, she's very frightened of the cartels that are running Mexico. And I've asked her numerous times, would you like us to take out the cartels? No. No. No, mister president. No. No, no, please. So we have to do something because we lost the real number is 300,000 people, in my opinion. You know, they like to say a 100,000. A 100,000 is a lot of people, but the real number is 300,000 people. And we lost it to drugs, and they come in through the southern border, mostly the southern border. A lot plenty come in through Canada too, by the way, in case you don't know. But but they come in through the southern border, and something's gonna have to be done with Mexico. Cuban government, the Trump administration's next target, mister secretary, very quickly. Speaker 3: Well, the Cuban government is a is a huge problem. Yeah. The the the the Cuban government is a huge problem for Speaker 2: some So is that a yes? Speaker 3: Cuba. But I don't think people fully appreciate. I think they're in a lot of trouble. Yes. I'm not gonna talk talk to you about what our future steps are gonna be and our policies are gonna be right now in this regard, but I don't think it's any mystery that we are not big fans of the Cuban regime, who, by the way, are the ones that were propping up Maduro. His entire, like, internal security force, his internal security opera apparatus is entirely controlled by Cubans. One of the untold stories here is how, in essence, you talk about colonization because I think you said Dulce Rodriguez mentioned that, the ones who have sort of colonized, at least inside the regime, are Cubans. It was Cubans that guarded Maduro. He was not guarded by Venezuelan bodyguards. He had Cuban bodyguards. In terms of their internal intelligence, who spies on who inside to make sure there are no traitors, those are all Cubans. Speaker 0: He felt very strongly. We we needed for nationals. We need Greenland for national security, not for minerals. We had some we have so many sites for minerals and oil and everything. We have more oil than any other country in the world. We need Greenland for national security.

The speaker describes a movie plot: Drug cartels unite to buy media and politicians, forcing global lockdowns. People can only leave their homes if they take the cartels' drugs repeatedly. The speaker rejected the script, deeming the idea unbelievable.

The movie plot involves the largest drug cartels taking control of the media and politicians, resulting in a worldwide lockdown where people can only leave their homes if they consume the cartels' drugs repeatedly. The speaker dismisses this idea as too outrageous to be believable and discards the script.

The speaker discusses the legal jurisdiction of selling drugs, specifically within the CIA. They mention that the ultimate power over the CIA lies with the executive branch of government. They emphasize that if the executive branch approves selling drugs, then it is considered acceptable. The speaker acknowledges engaging in classified activities in the best interest of protecting Americans. They express a practical mindset, stating that they would choose to sell cocaine to impoverished Latin American countries rather than allowing a hundred Americans to die. The speaker compares their approach to the listener's, implying similarity between them.