reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker expresses upset about a virus in vaccines but assures that it will be eliminated. They mention a person named Heiliger who was also upset. The speaker agrees with Heiliger's view that this virus is a problem for vaccines. They emphasize the need to detect and eliminate viruses. The speaker clarifies that there are already 40 different viruses in vaccines that are being inactivated. They mention a yellow fever vaccine that had leukemia virus in it, highlighting the progress in science. The speaker then discusses a conversation they had with someone about their concerns regarding the virus.

Doctors who promoted the vaccine were wrong, causing harm. Some doctors remain silent. A doctor treated vaccine injuries early on, defying rules and saving lives. Having a trustworthy doctor is rare. Apologies and explanations are needed for credibility.

The speaker expresses frustration with people who blindly follow vaccine recommendations without questioning their safety. They claim that the Canadian government lied about the long-term effects and efficacy of the Pfizer vaccine, citing a contract that acknowledges the unknowns and potential adverse effects. The speaker shares a personal experience of someone who initially dismissed their concerns but later suffered a vaccine injury. They vow to hold the Canadian government accountable and predict a rising wave of angry parents and individuals who will resist the World Health Organization's influence in Canada. The speaker concludes by asking if the audience is also fed up with the situation.

I worked as a nurse in a pediatric ICU until I questioned reporting vaccine side effects. Despite 13 years of caring for sick children, I faced ridicule and lost my job due to vaccine misinformation. I never got COVID at work, wore PPE, and tested regularly. Thank you. Translation: I worked as a nurse in a pediatric ICU until I questioned reporting vaccine side effects. Despite 13 years of caring for sick children, I faced ridicule and lost my job due to vaccine misinformation. I never got COVID at work, wore PPE, and tested regularly. Thank you.

The speaker discusses a WHO meeting in December 2019 where vaccine safety was questioned. It was revealed that there is no scientific proof that vaccines are safe and effective when used together. This realization exposed a 100-year bluff, leaving many concerned about the lack of evidence for vaccine safety. The cost and affordability of vaccines were also highlighted as a significant issue for families.

The speaker urges their colleagues in the medical field to do the right thing and speak out against the problems they have observed with the COVID-19 vaccines. They share examples of adverse reactions they have witnessed, including strokes, cancer in fully vaccinated individuals, heart problems, blood clots, and fertility issues. The speaker emphasizes the need for more doctors to join the movement and speak up, despite the potential consequences. They highlight the importance of using facts and clinical experience to support their claims. The speaker concludes by encouraging others to continue fighting for the truth and not retire, as they are backed by evidence and personal experiences.

Everything they said about the vaccine was wrong and has harmed many people. I wonder why more doctors aren't speaking up and admitting they were wrong, like I did when I endorsed the Iraq war. I've felt bad about it for 20 years and have apologized whenever I could, not to please others but to maintain my dignity. It's important to apologize if you unintentionally hurt someone. I wouldn't trust doctors who still lie about COVID, as they are dangerous and immoral.

The speaker briefly mentions a person who is afraid of getting vaccinated. They express concern for this individual and mention that they went to a certain place and then back again. The speaker ends by saying "Oh God, it's a pity for him, how scared he is."

The speaker acknowledges the risks of their actions but believes that exposing the truth is worth it. They are prepared to face imprisonment and criticism. In another segment, an IT worker is accused of spreading misinformation about vaccine-related deaths. The worker appeared in court, and the health agency is working to recover the data and reassure the public about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine. The worker allegedly shared cases of individuals who died after receiving the vaccine, citing cardiac arrest, brain bleeds, blood clots, and aneurysms as causes of death. The speaker emphasizes that they are not an expert but are willing to face criticism if it helps stop the misinformation.

I apologize for not paying attention to warnings about misinformation. Trust in vaccinations is eroded when scientific processes are not followed. A peer-reviewed article on COVID-19 vaccinations was demonetized on YouTube despite being scientifically sound. As a physician, I aim to have evidence-based discussions. The article highlighted potential risks of vaccinations, such as an increase in autoimmune disorders and spike proteins found in cardiac tissues. It is crucial to learn from past mistakes and have transparent discussions to build trust in emergency use authorizations. Translation: The speaker acknowledges not heeding warnings about misinformation and emphasizes the importance of following scientific processes for maintaining trust in vaccinations. They discuss a peer-reviewed article on COVID-19 vaccinations that was demonetized on YouTube despite being scientifically valid. As a physician, they advocate for evidence-based discussions and highlight potential risks associated with vaccinations, such as an increase in autoimmune disorders and the presence of spike proteins in cardiac tissues. Learning from past mistakes and fostering transparent discussions are crucial for building trust in emergency use authorizations.

Speaker 0 acknowledges the belief that the vaccine is valuable and saves lives. However, they question whether those who hold this belief have been misled by the government. Speaker 0 appreciates the chance to address those who have received the vaccine and states that they understand their perspective. In response to the question of whether all those who got vaccinated are foolish, Speaker 0 simply answers affirmatively.

The speaker expresses concerns about vaccines and their impact on the immune system. They mention their frustration with the lack of transparency from organizations like the WHO and CDC. They believe that interventions in the immune system without proper understanding are foolish. The speaker questions whether various groups, such as pregnant women and the elderly, were included in vaccine testing. They consider such omissions insulting.

COVID vaccines are declared safe by Speaker 0. Speaker 1 expresses pain, trauma, and regret due to lack of help for vaccine injuries. They mention people with amputations and heart conditions, and question why they had to set up a support group in Scotland. They criticize the vaccine damage payment scheme and state that over 30,000 people in Scotland have had adverse reactions to the vaccine. Speaker 1 demands that Rashid Shunaka start doing the right thing. Speaker 0 responds by saying that decisions regarding the vaccine were made based on medical advice from experts.

Doctors are generally educated and capable of understanding evidence, yet many have made incorrect statements about vaccines, causing harm. It's surprising that most American doctors haven't acknowledged their mistakes. Personally, I wouldn't trust a doctor who continues to misrepresent COVID information. One doctor I know treated me after I experienced vaccine-related issues. She recognized early on that something was wrong and treated her patients with steroids when others wouldn't, leading to better outcomes. Unfortunately, many people lack access to compassionate and knowledgeable doctors like her. It's hard to overlook the lack of accountability from many in the medical field, as credibility hinges on acknowledging past errors and the reasoning behind them.

My friends, including doctors, who initially supported vaccines are now skeptical due to the COVID vaccine propaganda, adverse effects like strokes and heart attacks, athletes collapsing, and increased all-cause mortality post-vaccination. Some even got pacemakers. People are hesitant to admit they were wrong and may have harmed others.

Living with the regret of getting vaccinated, feeling betrayed by trusted sources, and facing health issues. Despite facing online abuse, the speaker urges others to seek the truth and believe in the body's healing power. Expressing love and apologies to those affected, they emphasize unity in overcoming challenges together. Hope for healing and love is extended to all suffering.

The speaker describes a severe post-vaccination experience, saying the vaccine “took my immune system and just shook it around again,” and noting that “that’s still going on.” They reference reading evidence about adverse reactions, including “damage to the immune system,” and acknowledge they were not made aware of these risks beforehand. They recount losing the use of their hands for about three weeks and realizing they were “in real trouble.” The speaker was invited by Robin Monarchy to discuss the experience, and by that time they realized they “weren’t the only one that was suffering.” They contrast this personal ordeal with a sense of media over-saturation, saying they have “stopped watching TV.” They share a cartoon memory of a guy interviewing two Quakers who ask, “How come none of your community has got COVID?” and the Quakers respond, “Well, we don’t watch TV,” remarking, “It’s so true, man,” and noting that “so much of the sickness is in our heads now.” They describe feeling trapped between trusting what “your heart tells you is right” and what appears to be the prevailing narrative, and they emphasize the difficulty of communicating their feelings to family. The speaker mentions taking a risk by speaking out, noting they were “pleased to see that it went around without too much of flack,” but they did experience some backlash, particularly from people they least wanted to upset. A central concern expressed is fear about what vaccination could do to their children, describing it as perhaps “the biggest part of the reason” for speaking out and talking to their daughters about the possibility that they “may not be able to have kids.” They acknowledge that at that point in life, their daughters “don’t probably care,” implying a tension between present concerns and future implications. The speaker concludes with that vaccination remains a source of personal risk and disclosure within their family discussions.

In a 21-day program, there was distrust towards vaccinations. The speaker emphasized the importance of trust in the scientific process and how betraying that trust can lead to skepticism. Despite personal experiences with vaccinations, they urge people to trust credible information. They highlight the effort put into a specific report and aim to spread its valuable information.

The speaker acknowledges the risks of their actions but believes that exposing the truth is worth it. They are prepared to face imprisonment and are confident that the world will support them. The IT worker accused of accessing sensitive health data and spreading misinformation about vaccine-related deaths appears in court. The health agency is working to recover the data and reassure the public about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine. The speaker lists several cases of individuals who allegedly died after receiving the vaccine. They express their willingness to be targeted and emphasize that their goal is to stop the situation.

The speaker praises the doctor for being a reliable source of information during the pandemic. They mention that the doctor discussed the origins of the virus, the effectiveness of vaccines and masks, and always provided objective and science-based information. The speaker then brings up a conspiracy theory about the doctor getting someone kicked off Twitter for questioning the COVID vaccine. The doctor chooses not to comment directly on the accusation and expresses concerns about social media platforms not being able to police threats made against individuals. The speaker clarifies that their own experience with COVID and vaccines has been positive. The doctor reiterates their concern about threats being made against people's safety on social media platforms.

There is a discussion about how public trust in vaccination has changed since the pandemic. The speaker notes that years ago there were “five people in the world who were prepared to talk about the thorny issue of vaccination.” Post COVID, however, “half the adult population of the world are now saying, hold on, we don't trust you. You lied to us. It's not what you told us, safe and effective.” This skepticism extends to vaccines given to children, with the question, “Does this apply to all the other vaccines you're putting into my kids?” The speaker then asserts that “safety studies haven't been done,” suggesting that important research behind vaccines is incomplete or lacking. This leads to the claim that “they've created this mess for themselves.” Despite the frustration, the speaker emphasizes the moral weight of deception, stating, “it's really tough to lie. I mean, lying gets you into real trouble.”

The speaker addressed the Gavi community, stating that public trust in institutions, including medicine, has eroded. They allege that Gavi and the WHO partnered to silence dissenting views during the COVID-19 pandemic and made questionable recommendations regarding COVID-19 vaccines for pregnant women. While acknowledging Gavi's success in making medicine affordable, the speaker claims Gavi neglects vaccine safety, treating it as a PR problem rather than a health concern. They cite a 2017 study that found the DTP vaccine, heavily promoted by Gavi in developing countries, may increase all-cause mortality in children. The speaker urges Gavi to re-earn public trust and justify the $8 billion in US funding by taking vaccine safety seriously and considering all available science. They state that the US will not contribute further to Gavi until it prioritizes rigorously measured overall impacts and evidence-based medicine.

Dr. Deborah Birx acknowledges potential vaccine injuries, highlighting concerns about COVID vaccine effectiveness and safety. Changes in CDC vaccine definitions are noted. Birx urges reporting of reactions to maintain public trust. Reference to a John Hopkins document predicting loss of trust due to vaccine impacts is made. The video transitions to a debt relief advertisement.

The speaker received a letter from the officer's office requesting a report on the COVID response. The government accepted a certain amount of risk regarding the long-term efficacy and side effects of vaccines. There was a discussion about vaccine injuries and compensation, with one person mentioning that there is a system in place through ACC for managing such cases. The conversation then shifted to personal experiences and frustrations with the lack of acknowledgement and compensation for vaccine injuries. The speaker expressed their emotions and mentioned their involvement in the Vaccine Impact Support Network. They thanked someone for being there and admitted to rarely crying about anything.

Speaker 1 explains their decision not to take the vaccine, citing concerns about its rushed development and safety. They express a desire to set an example for their children and stand by their convictions, even at the cost of losing money. Speaker 0 acknowledges that standing by one's convictions is typically seen as heroic, but Speaker 1 faced criticism instead. Speaker 1 clarifies that they never publicly discouraged vaccination and preferred to keep their decision private. They mention knowing someone who was injured by the vaccine and emphasize the importance of speaking up about such experiences. Speaker 0 agrees that telling the truth often leads to trouble, highlighting a perceived lack of consequences for lying.