TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speakers assert that certain groups should be prevented from entering the country and proselytizing in mosques about overthrowing the government and replacing it with Sharia law. They argue this is sedition, not freedom of speech or religion, and that the battlefield is domestic. One speaker states that dismantling injustice involves replacing the system with people who represent the prophet and that Islam is jihad. Another speaker claims that spreading Islam involves jihad and fighting those who don't accept Islamic rule, which is a command of Allah. For Muslims in the West, jihad means establishing the deed of Allah through all means necessary, including using protests to overthrow non-Muslim governments.

The speaker explains the difference between Jews and Zionists. They state that Zionism is the opposite of Judaism, as it mistrusts God and goes against religious beliefs. Zionists are accused of committing crimes by taking land from others through killing and robbery, which goes against the commandments of not killing and not stealing. This is the fundamental difference between Zionists and others.

The problem with Islam is that Islam is an absolutist religion where Muslims believe this is the word of God aka Allah and no man can ever question the word of Allah which is extremely problematic and it has no place in any civilized culture. Chapter two verse 98. Allah is an enemy of non muslims. Chapter three verse 85: No other religion is accepted other than Islam. Chapter eight verse 12: Allah will instill fear in the hearts of those who disbelieve Islam and Muslims. You cut their limbs by hitting their necks. Chapter three verse 118. Make only Muslims your intimate friends. Chapter three verse 28 and chapter nine verse 23, do not make friends with non Muslims. Chapter eight verse 39. Fight non Muslims until the faith of Allah is fully established. Chapter 22 verse 30. Idols are filth. Chapter nine verse five, ambush and kill the idolaters and wherever and whenever you can find them. Chapter 33 verse 61, wherever the faithful and the idolaters are caught, they will be brutally killed. Chapter three verse 62, chapter two verse two fifty five, chapter 27 verse 61, and chapter 35 verse three. There is no other god than Allah. Chapter 21 verse 98 Those who worship anyone other than Allah are the fuel of hell. Idolaters are pure and unholy. Chapter four verse 101 Kafirs are open enemies and kafirs are basically sinners so anyone that doesn't believe in Islam will. Chapter nine verse 14: Allah will punish the disbelievers at the hands of the believers. Be cruel to the prisoners of war. Chapter eight verse 69: All spoils including women are halal, and that refers to the fact that Muhammad said that if Muslims go and conquer the land, then the women in that land are halal or permissible to the soldiers. Chapter nine verse 29 by humiliating infidels make jizya from them so if you don't know what jizya is, jizya is basically a tax imposed on non muslims when muslims govern the land so what used to happen was is that muslims attacked such 10 countries and they established a caliphate, so they either killed people that didn't convert to Islam, but some groups they were like okay if you don't want to convert to Islam you have to pay us an extra tax and that was called the jizya. Chapter 66 verse nine Do jihad war with the infidels and the beneficiaries. Chapter four verse 56: Will cook the skin of the disbeliever and you see that sometimes you know it happens in Pakistan, happens in Afghanistan when someone is blasphemous towards the Quran or Muhammad, they burn them to death, and it actually happened recently to some girl that was accused of ripping up the Quran and they burned her to death in public. Chapter eight verse 57: Be cruel to the prisoners of war. Chapter eight verse 69: All spoils including women are halal. Chapter nine verse 14: Allah will punish the disbelievers at the hands of the believers. Chapter thirty two verse 22: take revenge on those who leave islam so as you know the punishment for apostasy is death in islam and I'm considered an apostate because I'm an ex muslim so I just went through these verses okay to just spread awareness first of all but at the same time I want to know from the Labour government and from Kyrgyzstanbul are we as a homophobic if we question these things? It says in the Quran right and I didn't go for the hadiths because the hadiths are a thousand times worse. Are we as a homophobic if we question the life of Muhammad? Because he took part in 29 offensive battles.

Speaker 0: 5,000,000 Jews in Israel and 5,000,000 Jews in America cannot defeat 1,300,000,000 Muslims. But if the Christians are with us, maybe we have a fighting chance. It’s very unpalatable for Jews to love the Christians or to understand even if we don’t love the Christians that we should let the Christians help us. We should let the Christians help us. Speaker 1: What’s going on in the world today? There’s a very big divide. The 70 nations are really 35 and 35, and 35 are controlled by Edom, the Western world (what many consider America), and 35 are controlled by Ishmael, the Arab Muslim world. That world history is coming down to the two powers, the Western world against Ishmael. The question is, who stands last in that great war, which is also called Goy Gomagog. Right now, we are undergoing two simultaneous Golusim, Edom and Yeshma’am. We know that the two nations that will last till Mashiach comes is Rome and Yeshma’am. These are the only two nations that will exist until Mashiach comes. And, we wanna know who’s gonna be the last man standing, Asaph or Ishmael? By the way, my message to both of them is we wish both of them to wipe each other out. And, we all feel very comfortable here in the Western world. Yeah. You know, America will protect us and America will conquer Yeshmaul and then Mashiach will come. But, whatever it is, we wish both sides wiping out the other party. Speaker 2: There’s a battle between Edom and Ishmael. And until the end of days, these two forces will counterbalance. But what’s the greatest danger in the world? The greatest danger is if Eisov and Ishmael ever came together, if they ever united, they would destroy the world. You can never mix and together. When and come together, they destroy the world. Esau and Ishmael two times in history, and those were the two most dangerous moments in the collective history of a Jewish program. When Edom and Ishmael come together, Speaker 3: it brings destruction to the world. Speaker 1: If you wanna know, what would the world look like if the Western world and Ishmael ever got together? Auschwitz.

"Jihad is really removing oppression." "Muslims do not want to be wiped out like the Aborigines in Australia." "The white man carried out massacres and genocide against the Aborigines in Australia." "The white man carried out these massacres and genocide in Canada." "He carried out these genocides in The United States Of America, and he attempts to carry out these genocides today in Gaza." "But the deen of Islam has legislated jihad that wherever anyone attempts to carry out genocide, then Allah has commanded the Muslims, do not permit them to carry out genocide." "Take up arms and defend yourself, and do preemptive strikes wherever those preemptive strikes, which is offensive jihad, is needed."

Islamist preachers in British mosques are expressing support for Hamas and advocating for jihad against the Jews. They view the actions of Hamas as a welcome punch on the nose to the enemy. When asked if this can be classified as terrorism, they reject the term and defend the Palestinian resistance. They argue that inside Masjid al Aqsa, Zionist incursions occur daily and compare the actions there to Talmudic rituals in synagogues. They believe that those defending al Masjid al Aqsa should not be blamed, as they are fighting for a just cause.

Speaker argues that 'Allah of the Quran' cannot be the God revealed in Jesus Christ, citing that 'the best of all deceivers' describes Allah. He says the Arabic term means 'a shyster... a deceiver' and that 'there is no way that a Christian could ever say of his God that his God is the best of all deceivers.' He notes contradictions: 'no compulsion in religion' versus 'you have to kill the non believers' and jizya tax on Jews and Christians ('chapter nine verse 29'). He explains Meccan versus Medina periods: early verses 'to you your religion, to me my religion, no compulsion' and later commands that non-Muslims be killed or taxed for subjugation. He contrasts with Biblical signs of God—'pillar of cloud' and 'pillar of fire'—and claims Muhammad offered no proof. Finally: 'How to make your friends become Muslim? You lie to them... it's one god, bro.'

Humans without the guidance of Islam can act worse than animals, as even animals recognize a creator. Without Islam, people can engage in behaviors that are troubling. It's important to be grateful for having Islam and to acknowledge that those who don't, referred to as Kufar, live differently. For example, they may consume things like pig's blood.

Islam rejects democracy if it means creating laws that contradict Allah's revelations. The speaker defines democracy as humans creating laws and punishing people accordingly. They claim this entails injustice because humans don't know what is suitable for others, but Allah does. Therefore, any democracy that opposes Allah's revelations is rejected.

Islam is not a tolerant religion, despite the presence of tolerant Muslims like brother Jihad. The life of Muhammad, whom Muslims follow, involved killing, marrying a 9-year-old, and seeking revenge against those who opposed him. This contradicts the idea of tolerance. While some Muslims may be tolerant, the true nature of Islam is evil, based on my knowledge of Arabic and the Quran. I hope to see Middle Eastern people protesting against the control of religion and Allah himself, similar to the European spring against religious authority. By telling my people the truth about Islam, I believe they will fight against it and belong to God instead.

Speaker 0 asks for a single verse in the Quran, the hadith, and the Islamic literature that says, "go and kill innocent people." It's a challenge, with lines like, "It's a can. It's wanna hear it? Do wanna hear it?" He responds, "Yeah. I will cast terror into the hearts of the disbelievers. Therefore, cut off their necks Okay. And cut off every fingertip." "That's one. There are a 142. Go to Surah five. Go to Surah eight. Go to Surah 12." He adds, "Don't come here and pretend to me that your book is any different to any other sect of Islam." "Okay. Okay. I've studied the Quran. I've studied the Bible." Then, "Let me tell you one thing. Yeah. And this is a fact."

In this video, the speaker provides a brief overview of Islamic history. They explain that Prophet Mohammed initially preached in Mecca but failed to gain many followers. He then went to Medina to recruit Jews, but when they refused, he turned against them and started killing and expelling them. Islam transformed from a spiritual movement to a political one. Jews and Christians became second-class citizens and had to pay a tax to stay alive. They were also restricted in various ways, such as not being able to ring church bells or gather publicly. Jews were identified with a yellow star, while Christians wore a belt.

In our religion, capital punishment is justified for those who leave and spread corruption. It is not for individuals to take into their own hands, but under an emir's authority in an Islamic state. The Sharia aims to protect society over individual freedoms like drinking alcohol or causing harm. This prioritization is crucial to prevent chaos and maintain order.

In Islam, equality for all members is questionable. Referencing a hadith from Sahih Muslim, it states Muslims shouldn't greet Jews and Christians first and should force them to the narrow side of the road. Historically, non-Muslims in Islamic states faced degrading conditions. They couldn't dress like Muslims; they had to give up their clothes to Muslims. They were forced to wear a red belt, shave their foreheads, wear mismatched shoes, walk in the road, and ride mules. These discriminatory practices extended to children, potentially coercing them into Islam to avoid such humiliation. Even hospitality was unequal, with Muslims receiving preferential treatment over non-Muslims, potentially causing social problems within non-Muslim families. This inequality is the reality of the Islamic State.

In Islamic history, non-Muslims paid jizya as protection money to be exempt from military service. Only those able to fight paid, while women, children, elderly, and religious leaders were exempt. Muslims also paid zakat for charity. The jizya ensured the protection of minorities, allowing them to freely practice their religion. In 1099, Jews and Christians fought alongside Muslims against Crusaders in Jerusalem, showing trust and faith in Muslims.

Speaker 0 asks if at some point there will be sharia law everywhere. Speaker 1 replies, “Percent. This is my goal and every Muslim's goal.” Speaker 0 acknowledges the idea of establishing sharia law on earth and asks what would happen to someone like them who is a murtad and believes they should be killed under sharia if such law is universal. Speaker 1 states that the decision is “up to the army.” Speaker 0 questions whether it would be fair under Islamic law for someone to be killed simply because they arrived at the wrong conclusion, asserting they would be killed for being a murtad, and asks if that would be fair. Speaker 1 reiterates, “In the Sharia law, that's what I follow,” and that if sharia is universal, the speaker would follow that rule. Speaker 0 challenges the fairness of a system where their safety hinges on adherence to sharia, noting that if Islam dominates all of earth, there would be no safe haven for them. Speaker 1 confirms this by saying, “That's the plan. And you where.” Speaker 0 asks where their safe haven would be if all of earth is under Islam, and suggests that safety would have to come from Islam itself. Speaker 1 responds that safety would be found within Islam, implying it would be by force if necessary. Speaker 0 contends that safe haven would require conversion to Islam, and if they do not return to Islam, punishment would be death. Speaker 1 concludes that there are two choices, then says “Slam or death,” indicating the binary outcome under the stated framework.

When Muslims conquer a neighboring country, the prophet instructs them to first invite the people to Islam. If they decline, they are required to pay taxes for protection. In return, they can continue living in their homes and country, but they must adhere to Sharia law, which means no nightclubs or fornication. If they still refuse, then fighting becomes necessary. If the Muslims are victorious, the conquered people become slaves and their land is taken. The speaker believes that in the next few decades, Muslims will become stronger and offer these options to non-Muslims.

The speaker claims that people sacrifice their children because they are dearest to their hearts. According to the speaker, a sense of sacred duty, the principles of Islam and jihad, and God's path are the ultimate priority. The speaker states that Israelis should give up all the land. The speaker concludes by saying that Israelis should either leave alive or leave in pieces.

Muslims are encouraged to fight Jews and Christians for expansion. Peace with non-Muslims is not possible as Islam is a warrior religion. Living in non-Muslim countries like Britain is seen as being in a state of war. Treaties with non-Muslims can be temporary and should end when Muslims become stronger.

Killing others is sometimes legitimate under law. Non-Islamic systems killing others is considered legitimate, but when Islam talks about its own version of Islamic law, it is labeled terrorism, which is a double standard. Islam is a system that addresses all aspects of life, like the Norwegian system, which has its own version of jihad. Jihad means fight. There is a Norwegian version of jihad and an Islamic version. The latest stage of Islamic jihad involves finding them wherever you find them, which is considered offensive jihad.

Shirk, the act of associating partners with Allah, is considered the most evil of all evils. Only Muslims follow Tawhid, the belief in the oneness of Allah. Jihad is a means to establish Tawhid, not a goal in itself. In the state of jihad, the life and property of a mushrik (polytheist) hold no value. The Prophet Muhammad was commanded to fight until people testify that there is no deity worthy of worship except Allah. Once they do, their life and property become protected. Christians are considered mushrikun and commit shirk, making them impure in the eyes of Allah.

According to the speaker, civilians must self-identify by surrendering or showing they are not a threat. If someone is coming to shoot, they are not considered a civilian. It is not your responsibility to determine if someone will become a threat. Even babies must be identified as non-militant. Human shields are not considered civilians, as they are tools of war. In conflicts between Arab nations, civilians are not discussed, unlike in conflicts involving the speaker's group.

Speaker 0 describes a conversation with a Somali neighbor about what he calls "Somalian fraud" in Minnesota. The neighbor explains that many Somalis come from clan-based and Muslim-majority backgrounds with distinct beliefs about spoils, subjugation, and taxation. He says that, in Somalia, Muslims believe the spoils of war are rightfully theirs and that, when they subjugate non-believers, they impose a tax on them. He asserts that Somalis in Minnesota view their “plunder” as something that non-believers pay to them, effectively framing it as a tax paid by white people to Somalis and Muslims. The neighbor further claims that Somalis “do not comprehend the Western laws” and do not see them as competing with the Sharia law they practice. He explains that the outrage over fraud is hard for them to grasp because, in their belief system, these actions are permitted. He also states that in their religion, they are permitted to lie, and that their behavior in Minnesota—being outraged when fraud is exposed—aligns with teachings that permit lying, taxing non-believers, and plundering because it is viewed as rightfully theirs. The speaker reflects that this perspective might make sense if one is raised under one belief system and moves to another, and notices dissonance with Western norms. He adds a postscript noting that the neighbor suggested people might be upset about issues like marrying very young girls, pointing to cultural practices they say have been happening in Somalia. In sum, the speaker relays a neighbor’s claim that Somalis view Western laws as subordinate to their Sharia-based beliefs, justify exploitation as rightful “plunder” and taxation of non-believers, and may excuse deception as permissible, framing these actions as consistent with their religious and cultural background.

When Muslims conquer a neighboring country, the prophet advises calling them to Islam first. If they refuse, they are obligated to pay taxes in exchange for Muslim protection. This ensures they can live peacefully in their homes and country, following Sharia law by not engaging in activities like opening nightclubs or engaging in fornication. However, if they still refuse, then fighting becomes necessary. If captured, they become slaves and their land is taken. The speaker believes that in the next few decades, Muslims will become stronger and offer these options to non-Muslims.