reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Megyn Kelly discusses troubling reports regarding Kamala Harris's campaign and her past, particularly focusing on allegations of plagiarism. She compares the current political landscape to a horse race, suggesting that Trump is gaining momentum as Harris's campaign falters. Kelly highlights a report from the Washington Free Beacon detailing Harris's history of plagiarizing speeches and fabricating stories to enhance her image, including a fictional account of a sex trafficking victim while serving as California Attorney General. The discussion includes specific examples of Harris's alleged plagiarism, such as her testimony before Congress in 2007, where she reportedly copied 80% of her speech from another district attorney. Another example involves a 2012 report on human trafficking that included a fabricated story about a victim named Kelly, which was actually taken from a nonprofit's representative account. Kelly emphasizes that these revelations echo past scandals, like Joe Biden's plagiarism issues, and questions whether the media will address them. Guests Hogan Gidley and Doug Schoen weigh in, expressing skepticism about the impact of these allegations on Harris's campaign, citing media bias and the short timeframe before the election. They discuss Harris's lack of authenticity and her ties to Biden, suggesting that her campaign struggles stem from a lack of substantive achievements and a failure to connect with voters. The conversation shifts to polling data showing Trump leading in key swing states, with Gidley and Schoen analyzing the implications for the upcoming election. They note that early voting trends in Nevada indicate a potential Republican advantage, although they caution that the situation could change. The latter part of the transcript features an interview with Xi Van Fleet, a survivor of Mao's Cultural Revolution, who draws parallels between her experiences in China and current political trends in the U.S., particularly regarding indoctrination and division. Van Fleet warns that critical race theory and other ideologies reflect a similar pattern of control and oppression, urging Americans to recognize the dangers of these movements. She emphasizes the importance of preserving freedom and understanding the historical context of such ideologies.

Megyn Kelly critiques Kamala Harris's recent interview with Brett Baier on Fox News, labeling it a "total failure." She argues that Harris missed an opportunity to connect with Fox viewers by focusing excessively on bashing Donald Trump rather than addressing substantive issues. Kelly highlights Harris's repetitive and vague economic plans, which she claims are unrealistic without full Democratic control of Congress. Kelly emphasizes that Harris dodged critical questions on immigration, the economy, and Biden's mental acuity, instead resorting to non-responsive talking points. She criticizes Harris for failing to take responsibility for her administration's policies, particularly regarding immigration, where she deflected blame and avoided acknowledging the consequences of her actions. The interview's dynamic, according to Kelly, showcased Harris's inability to answer tough questions, which she believes would have been an opportunity to define herself positively to a skeptical audience. Instead, Harris's strategy of attacking Trump was ineffective, as Fox viewers are generally supportive of him. Kelly asserts that Harris's performance revealed her as someone who cannot handle hard questions, contrasting her with past candidates who managed to engage effectively with the media. Kelly also discusses the media's reaction to the interview, noting that many left-leaning commentators praised Harris while criticizing Baier for being "rude." She argues that Baier was simply doing his job by pressing for answers, which Harris failed to provide. The conversation shifts to the broader implications of Harris's performance for her campaign and the upcoming election, with Kelly suggesting that her inability to articulate a clear message or take responsibility could hinder her prospects. The summary concludes with a reflection on the current political landscape, emphasizing the importance of addressing voters' concerns directly rather than relying on evasive tactics.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the media's neglect of American women's issues, focusing on Kamala Harris's recent appearance on the podcast "Call Her Daddy." Kelly criticizes the media's celebration of Harris's interview, arguing it was a failure in presidential politics. She highlights a moment where Harris responded to Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders's comments about humility, asserting that many women do not aspire to be humble and emphasizing the importance of diverse family structures. Kelly argues that attacking Harris for not having biological children is a poor political strategy for Republicans. Kelly expresses frustration with Harris's lack of humility and governing experience, noting that her responses often reflect insecurity. She criticizes the media for failing to address serious allegations against Doug Emhoff, Harris's husband, who has been accused of assaulting an ex-girlfriend. Kelly points out the hypocrisy in Harris's claims to be a champion for women while ignoring the allegations against Emhoff. The discussion shifts to Harris's interview content, which Kelly claims focused heavily on abortion, neglecting broader issues affecting women. She challenges the narrative that the GOP wants to take away women's rights, arguing that there are many other pressing concerns for women that are overlooked. Kelly emphasizes the need for a more comprehensive discussion about women's rights beyond abortion. Andrew Klavan joins the conversation, agreeing with Kelly's assessment of the media's protection of Harris and the need for Republicans to articulate a clearer message about her policies. He criticizes the Democratic Party's anti-American ideology and suggests that the GOP has failed to effectively communicate the dangers of Harris's beliefs. The conversation touches on the media's portrayal of Trump and Biden, with Klavan noting that the press often overlooks Biden's failings while scrutinizing Trump. They discuss the importance of strong leadership and the perception of strength in a president, contrasting Trump’s resilience with Harris's perceived weaknesses. Kelly concludes by reflecting on Trump's recent rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, where he demonstrated strength and connection with his family, contrasting this with the media's portrayal of Harris. She emphasizes the need for a more balanced view of both candidates, highlighting the importance of their personal lives in understanding their character.

On October 8, 2024, Dave Rubin hosts the Rubin Report, addressing various political issues, notably focusing on Kamala Harris's recent interviews, particularly her appearance on 60 Minutes. Rubin criticizes Harris, labeling her an "NPC" (non-playable character) lacking independent thought and competence, especially regarding her handling of immigration policies. He highlights her inability to answer questions about the surge in illegal border crossings during her administration, arguing that she deflects responsibility and provides vague responses. Rubin also discusses the media's role in supporting Harris, suggesting that they gloss over her shortcomings while criticizing her opponents. He contrasts Harris's political maneuvering with Florida Governor Ron DeSantis's leadership during hurricane emergencies, asserting that Harris is politicizing disaster responses for her campaign. DeSantis, in turn, refutes Harris's claims about communication breakdowns, emphasizing his focus on public safety over political games. The show touches on broader themes of political accountability, media bias, and the implications of immigration policies on electoral dynamics. Rubin expresses concern that if Democrats continue their current trajectory, they may undermine the electoral system by legalizing large numbers of immigrants who could sway future elections. He concludes by asserting that the choice between freedom and government control is crucial for America's future, urging viewers to recognize the stakes involved in the upcoming elections.

Megan Kelly discusses new battleground state polling indicating a tight race between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, with polls showing Pennsylvania essentially tied and Harris slightly ahead in some states. There appears to be no significant debate bump for Harris. Trump held a rally in New York, which is not a key state for him, while Harris made headlines for adopting a new accent during a speech to the Congressional Hispanic Caucus. The hosts criticize Harris's perceived inauthenticity, suggesting she changes her persona to fit her audience, and express concerns about her lack of clarity on policy positions. They describe her as a "chameleon" politician who may not have a consistent ideology. The discussion touches on her past statements and how they contrast with her current campaign rhetoric, suggesting she is trying to appeal to a broader base without committing to specific policies. The conversation shifts to Trump's emotional range and ability to connect with voters, highlighting his humor and relatability compared to Harris. They note that Trump's recent rally showcased his charm and ability to engage with supporters, contrasting it with Harris's awkward public appearances. The hosts also discuss the implications of recent assassination attempts on Trump and how the media and Democrats respond to political violence. They express skepticism about the Democrats' narrative that Trump is a threat, arguing that it reflects their own fears and political strategy. In North Carolina, the gubernatorial race is heating up, with Republican Mark Robinson facing controversy that could impact turnout. The hosts emphasize the importance of candidate quality in elections and the potential consequences of negative stories on voter enthusiasm. Polling data shows a competitive landscape in key states, with Trump performing better than in previous elections, but the hosts caution that turnout will ultimately determine the outcome. They conclude that the election is likely to be close, with significant implications for both parties.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing Kamala Harris's recent interview, criticizing her inability to provide substantive answers about her economic plans. Kelly highlights Harris's vague responses, particularly regarding how her policies address the needs of the majority of Americans, noting that her proposals seem limited to specific groups like first-time homebuyers and new parents. Kelly expresses frustration at the lack of follow-up questions from the interviewer, Stephanie Rule, and points out Harris's repetitive use of phrases like "hardworking" and "dreams," which she feels do not convey any real solutions. Kelly critiques Harris's claim that her vision for the economy is an "opportunity economy," arguing that it fails to address the broader economic struggles faced by many Americans. She emphasizes that Harris's plans do not resonate with the majority, as they focus on a narrow demographic. The discussion shifts to Harris's comments on taxes, where she asserts that those making under $400,000 will not see tax increases, a claim Kelly disputes by citing rising costs due to inflation. The conversation transitions to the border crisis, with Kelly introducing Kari Lake, a Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate in Arizona. Lake expresses her disdain for Harris's interview, calling it a "word salad" and emphasizing the dire economic situation in Arizona, particularly for young people facing skyrocketing housing prices and high mortgage rates. Lake highlights the impact of inflation and government spending on everyday Americans, criticizing the Biden administration's policies. Lake discusses her campaign and the importance of addressing immigration and border security, asserting that the current administration's approach has led to increased crime and economic strain. She argues that illegal immigration is exacerbating housing shortages and driving up costs for American citizens. Lake also touches on the issue of abortion, stating that it should be decided at the state level and emphasizing the need for pro-family legislation. James O'Keefe joins the discussion to promote his documentary "Line in the Sand," which explores the border crisis and the involvement of various organizations profiting from the situation. O'Keefe describes his experiences following migrants and cartel activities, revealing the complexities and dangers they face. He highlights the financial motivations behind NGOs and government funding related to immigration, arguing that the system perpetuates the crisis for profit. The conversation concludes with a focus on the lack of media coverage regarding crimes committed by illegal immigrants, particularly in light of recent incidents in Nantucket. O'Keefe emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability in addressing the border crisis, framing it as a humanitarian issue that transcends political divides.

Dave Rubin opens the show discussing a bizarre start, mentioning the toxicity of epoxy being poured in the studio. He expresses skepticism about Kamala Harris, suggesting she is being framed as a leading candidate despite her past failures, including her presidential run where she received zero votes. He critiques the media's narrative shift from Biden to Harris, emphasizing the need to expose her policies. Dave Portnoy, a cultural figure, shares his disdain for the extreme left and criticizes Harris for being handpicked rather than elected, calling it a hijacking of democracy. He argues that the Democrats are manipulating the political process and that the public is being insulted by their claims of grassroots support for Harris. Dave highlights the lack of genuine support for Harris among the public, noting his difficulty in finding anyone who defends her. He discusses the Democrats' tactics, including the framing of their agenda as beneficial while undermining democracy. He also critiques Harris's policies, including her stance on policing and dietary guidelines, labeling her as a communist. The conversation shifts to the cultural landscape, with mentions of figures like Elon Musk and Aiden Ross expressing support for Trump, indicating a broader shift among younger audiences. Dave concludes by asserting the importance of maintaining a wide political tent and fostering a welcoming environment for diverse supporters while continuing to expose the left's actions.

On November 2, 2020, Dave Rubin discusses the upcoming American election, highlighting the tension surrounding the potential outcomes between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. He expresses concern about the chaotic political climate, emphasizing the uncertainty regarding election results and public trust. Rubin critiques Kamala Harris's recent video on equity versus equality, arguing that her views misrepresent American values and promote an anti-human agenda. He shares his experiences attending Trump rallies in Beverly Hills, contrasting them with Biden's events, which he claims lack enthusiasm and grassroots support. Rubin warns of potential violence if Trump wins, while asserting that Trump supporters would not engage in similar behavior if Biden wins. He reflects on his political evolution, stating that he now supports Trump as the best option for preserving American values and freedoms. Rubin also addresses the dangers of authoritarian governance, citing Gretchen Whitmer's new COVID restrictions in Michigan. He encourages viewers to express their political beliefs without fear, emphasizing the importance of individual liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

The hosts discuss various topics, starting with the aftermath of Hurricane Milton in Florida, which caused significant damage and raised concerns about insurance companies reconsidering their presence in the state. They express sympathy for those affected and highlight the ongoing issues with Florida's insurance market. The conversation shifts to political discussions, including comments from the Teamsters Union president criticizing the Democratic Party for neglecting working-class interests. They touch on Trump's private communications with Putin and the perception of the economy as a crucial election issue, with Trump gaining an edge in polls. Kamala Harris's recent interview on CBS is analyzed, with the hosts criticizing her performance and the editing of her responses. They argue that she lacks substance and is not engaging, contrasting her with more dynamic political figures. The hosts express frustration over her inability to articulate a distinct vision separate from Biden. The hosts also discuss the implications of recent polling data, noting shifts in voter sentiment, particularly among demographics traditionally aligned with the Democrats. They highlight the importance of voter turnout and the potential for a significant change in the political landscape. In a lighter segment, they mention a playlist of songs chosen by terminally ill individuals for their final moments, reflecting on the emotional weight of such choices. They also discuss the absurdity of celebrity reactions to political events, particularly Keith Olbermann's call for Elon Musk's deportation. The hosts conclude with a discussion about Doug Emhoff, Kamala Harris's husband, and allegations of inappropriate behavior during his career, questioning the implications of such claims for his public image and the broader political narrative. They emphasize the need for accountability and the potential impact of personal character on political leadership.

The podcast hosts critically discuss Kamala Harris's apparent presidential aspirations, expressing strong skepticism given her past electoral failures and perceived inauthenticity. They argue that Harris's political approach, characterized by poll-tested statements and a lack of genuine engagement in current political struggles, disqualifies her in the eyes of the Democratic base. The hosts contend that the base is increasingly disillusioned with traditional party elites and media, evidenced by the rising support for populist figures like Zohran Mamdani and Graham Platner, who are seen as more actively fighting for their constituents. A significant portion of the discussion focuses on a perceived shift in the Democratic Party's platform between 2012 and 2014. Analysis of party documents reveals a drastic decrease in mentions of economic terms like "jobs," "middle class," and "economy," while terms related to cultural and identity issues such as "equity," "LGBT," and specific racial groups saw massive increases. The hosts argue that this pivot towards cultural identity politics, initially used by liberals to counter populist movements, has alienated working-class voters and led to the adoption of unpopular policy positions, contributing to electoral losses. The hosts express doubt that the Democratic Party has learned from these mistakes, contrasting their data-driven, centrist approach with Donald Trump's success in selling a forceful, narrative-driven story despite holding unpopular positions. They highlight upcoming elections, including the midterms and the 2028 presidential race, as crucial tests for the party's future direction and its ability to embrace a more populist, economically focused message that resonates with a broader electorate, rather than relying on established "machines" and consultants.

Dave Rubin, joined by Clay Travis and Buck Sexton, opened a Halloween-themed episode by discussing current political events with a lighthearted, critical tone. A significant portion of the conversation focused on Kamala Harris's book tour and her evasiveness regarding President Biden's cognitive abilities. The hosts debated whether Harris would run for president, with Buck and Dave predicting she wouldn't, while Clay argued she would, attempting to rebrand herself as a loyal but ultimately constrained vice president. They criticized her and other Democratic figures for perceived dishonesty and a disconnect from reality in their public appearances. The discussion then shifted to Gavin Newsom, who the hosts believe is strategically positioning himself as a future Democratic presidential nominee. They characterized Newsom as a "shameless" politician adept at pandering to the Democratic electorate while distancing himself from Biden's perceived failures. Clay and Buck agreed that Newsom, potentially with AOC as his running mate, represents the most sophisticated and ruthless adversary the Democrats could put forward, highlighting his ability to lie effectively and withstand political attacks, drawing comparisons to Patrick Bateman from American Psycho. Further political critique centered on the House Oversight Committee's report alleging Biden used an autopen for executive actions and pardons, suggesting a cover-up of his cognitive decline. While skeptical of legal repercussions, the hosts emphasized the political significance of this as evidence supporting their long-held belief that Biden was not fully in charge. They extended this criticism to legacy media, particularly "The View" and CNN, for their perceived intellectual laziness, reliance on teleprompters, and failure to challenge Democratic narratives or engage in substantive debate, often dismissing legitimate concerns about Biden's health. The conversation also delved into the state of left-wing media, exemplified by a clip of a podcaster making extreme personal attacks against Riley Gaines for her stance on women's sports. Clay and Buck argued that the internet's meritocratic nature has forced conservative voices to sharpen their arguments, while the left, historically protected by mainstream media, has become intellectually soft and prone to hysteria. They credited platforms like Elon Musk's X (formerly Twitter) for breaking traditional media's control and enabling real-time fact-checking, thereby leveling the playing field for political discourse. Finally, the hosts discussed the rapid advancement of AI and robotics, specifically the pre-order availability of the "Neo" humanoid robot. Concerns were raised about privacy implications, given the potential for human operators to view private homes through the robot's cameras. More broadly, they expressed apprehension about the transformative impact of AI on job automation, predicting significant job displacement in various sectors, from white-collar professions to delivery services, within the next 15-20 years, signaling a major technological tipping point.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing her admiration for Billboard Chris, a father advocating against the harms of gender ideology on children. She introduces Charlie Spiering, a political journalist with a new book titled *Amateur Hour: Kamala Harris in the White House*, which reveals untold stories about Vice President Kamala Harris's rise in politics, including her controversial relationship with Willie Brown, which helped launch her career. Spiering explains that Harris's political ascent was aided by her connections and her identity as a woman of color, which resonated with progressive Democrats. The conversation shifts to Harris's tenure as District Attorney of San Francisco, where she faced backlash for not seeking the death penalty for a police officer's murder, leading to tensions with police and political figures like Dianne Feinstein. Spiering notes that Harris later distanced herself from her tough-on-crime past during her presidential campaign, attempting to rebrand herself as more progressive. Harris's presidential run is discussed, particularly her debate moment where she accused Joe Biden of racism, which strained their relationship. Despite this, Biden chose her as his running mate, a decision that many viewed as politically motivated rather than based on a strong partnership. Spiering highlights the lack of genuine camaraderie between Harris and Biden, as seen in their limited interactions and the way she has been sidelined in the administration. The discussion also touches on Harris's communication style, which has been criticized for being overly simplistic and lacking depth. Spiering points out her struggles with public speaking and connecting with audiences, often resorting to clichés and platitudes. The second half of the show features Billboard Chris, who discusses his activism against gender ideology and its impact on children. He emphasizes the importance of language in the debate, advocating for the use of "sex" instead of "gender" to clarify the biological differences. Chris argues that the current push for gender identity is harmful and confusing for children, and he calls for a return to recognizing the two biological sexes. Chris shares his journey from a financial advisor to a prominent activist, using billboards and sandwich boards to raise awareness. He highlights the growing support for legislation against gender transition procedures for minors, citing successful initiatives in various states. Chris encourages parents to engage in activism and support organizations like Moms for Liberty to protect children from harmful ideologies. The show concludes with a call to action for viewers to get involved in the fight against gender ideology, emphasizing the need for community and collective effort to safeguard children's well-being.