reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the Biden family's alleged scheme of dispersing money to other family members to make their numbers appear lower. They claim that there were at least 12 family members involved in this influence peddling scheme, with no legitimate business dealings found on the Biden end. The speaker suggests that there may be more laws broken than just tax evasion and questions whether Hunter Biden and other family members will be indicted. They also mention the six decisions made by Biden that allegedly helped China and express concerns about his soft stance on China. The speaker wonders if Biden is compromised due to the millions of dollars his family has received from the Chinese Communist Party.

The speaker accuses the Biden family of receiving over $20 million from foreign countries while Joe Biden was vice president. They claim that Biden is compromised, bribed, and blackmailed, making him a Manchurian candidate. The speaker alleges that Biden allowed other countries, particularly China, to take advantage of the United States. They criticize Biden for shutting down initiatives targeting Chinese spies, not holding China accountable for COVID-19, and neglecting threats from China and Russia. The speaker asserts that Biden's corruption poses a significant national security threat and suggests that his actions could lead to World War 3. They also criticize the appointment of a special counsel by the Biden DOJ, calling it a cover-up. The speaker promises to appoint a real special counsel if reelected to investigate alleged crimes committed by the Biden family.

The Biden family received over $15 million from foreign nationals and companies, including Ukraine, Russia, and China, between 2014 and 2019. Joe Biden has lied about his involvement in Hunter Biden's business dealings at least 16 times. The president met or spoke with Hunter's foreign business associates at least 22 times. Checks written to Joe Biden were found in banking records, including $40,000 from China and $200,000 from a bankrupt healthcare company linked to his brother James Biden. The evidence is clear, and the Constitution requires the House to follow the truth. We have a duty to continue the process.

Speaker 0: President Biden lied to the American people, his family profited through shell companies, and his Federal agencies are obstructing the congressional inquiry. There are numerous scandals and corruption cases that have been uncovered. President Biden claimed he never discussed his son's business dealings, but evidence shows otherwise. He had dinner with Russian and Kazakhstani oligarchs, spoke with Hunter's associates over 20 times, and met with a Chinese energy company while Hunter worked for them. A text message from Hunter implies a commitment not fulfilled. A confidential source alleged a $5 million bribe to President Biden. The House Oversight Committee investigation found that Hunter flew on air force 2 at least 15 times to enrich the Biden family. This impeachment inquiry will give House Investigators more subpoena authority to gather evidence from uncooperative federal agencies. The New York Post's report on Hunter Biden's laptop was falsely labeled as Russian disinformation. Social media banned the story, but it was later revealed to be legitimate. A court opinion confirmed that the White House and federal agencies were censoring conservative speech on social media platforms.

The IRS agents found evidence to investigate Joe Biden for financial crimes. Despite claims of no evidence linking Joe to Hunter Biden's businesses, the speaker believes it is untrue.

The speaker discusses the RICO statute and refers to the Biden family enterprise as a classic RICO case. They claim that the Biden family monetized Joe Biden's public office and sold it for personal gain. They mention incidents during the Obama administration and before Biden became vice president where individuals associated with the Bidens sold Joe's influence. The speaker argues that this constitutes a RICO case involving Hobbs Act extortion, bribery, and fraud. They criticize the double standard in investigating Trump and Biden. They mention Victor Shokin's testimony, which they believe corroborates the allegations against Biden. The speaker also highlights lies and distortions from the Biden camp and the media. They conclude by stating that evidence of wrongdoing exists and that Hunter Biden was indeed a subject of investigation.

Speaker 0 claims to have evidence that could lead to the imprisonment or impeachment of someone. They mention a grand jury and a special prosecutor. Speaker 1 suggests that Joe Biden's motive for going to Ukraine was not to fight corruption, but rather to assist the natural gas industry. They mention that Biden's son was involved with a major Ukrainian natural gas company.

The speaker criticizes the White House for denying Joe Biden's involvement in Hunter Biden's business dealings with China. They argue that evidence, including bank records and emails, proves Joe Biden's intimate involvement. They mention an email discussing equity in a Chinese energy venture tied to the Chinese Communist Party. The speaker questions who else benefited from these deals and refers to Joe Biden as the "big guy." They accuse the White House of gaslighting and urge the American people to examine the evidence and make their own judgment.

The speaker discusses allegations of payments made by an undisclosed country to the Biden family. They mention that the family created shell companies while Joe Biden was vice president to profit from his position. The speaker questions if Biden's compromised position affects his decision-making as president. They claim to have evidence of $10 million received by the family and suggest it could be between $15 and $30 million in total. The speaker highlights that the countries involved, including China, are not reputable and even major companies avoid doing business with them. They emphasize the need for Biden to explain why his family received money. The speaker expresses frustration with the lack of media coverage and promises to continue investigating and revealing the truth to the American people.

The speaker sends a clear message to the Department of Justice, urging them not to indict Hunter Biden until they have seen the evidence presented by the House Oversight Committee. They claim that the Biden family, including the president, has been involved in influence peddling with various adversarial countries through LLCs. The speaker believes that the IRS and DOJ are unaware of many undisclosed accounts and have not thoroughly investigated the matter. They have spent the past 100 days examining bank documents and meeting with former associates and whistleblowers to uncover the truth. The speaker suggests that the charges against Hunter Biden, such as potential money laundering and being an unregistered foreign agent, are minor compared to the crimes committed. They believe that these countries received policy decisions in return for their investments in the Biden family. Wednesday is anticipated as a significant day for the American people to learn the facts and for the Department of Justice to take appropriate action.

The speaker discusses the Biden family's alleged web of concealment and corruption, highlighting the numerous companies and transactions involved. He emphasizes that the Biden family's only business is politics and questions the purpose of creating so many companies to conceal money. The speaker also mentions specific companies connected to Hunter Biden and the growing list of companies being investigated. He criticizes the Department of Justice for the lack of progress in investigating Hunter Biden. The speaker concludes by stating that there is no legitimate business for the Biden family except their involvement in politics, and the committee will continue to investigate and provide information to the press and the DOJ.

President Joe Biden is facing allegations of taking action to hide money received by his family. Evidence includes payments of $15 million to the Biden family, $240,000 directly to Joe Biden, and a threatening message from Hunter Biden to a Chinese executive. The investigation also focuses on four key questions: whether Biden changed policy due to benefits received, if he provided access to foreign interests in exchange for payments, if he obstructed the investigation into Hunter Biden, and if he abused his office. The impeachment inquiry aims to uncover answers to these questions and determine the grounds for potential articles of impeachment.

President Biden's denial of discussing business with Hunter Biden's associates is called a lie by the speaker. The speaker claims that Joe Biden's 40-year career in Washington, DC is the Biden family business. The speaker presents evidence of James Biden receiving a loan based on his political connections, and then transferring money to Joe Biden. The speaker also mentions an email referring to Joe Biden as the "big guy" in a joint venture. The speaker accuses Hunter Biden of not registering as a foreign agent despite his work with a Chinese energy company. The speaker calls for an impeachment investigation into Joe Biden's alleged corruption and pay-for-play tactics.

The speakers discuss the evidence for an impeachment inquiry against Joe Biden. Speaker 2 argues that the Bidens' ownership of expensive homes and receipt of large sums of money from overseas interests, along with the existence of shell companies, suggest corruption and money laundering. They also mention that the prosecutor investigating the company Biden's son worked for was fired. Speaker 1 supports this argument and mentions the possibility of a foreign corrupt practices act investigation. Speaker 0 questions the lack of indictments and subpoenas, but Speaker 1 explains that an impeachment inquiry is needed for jurisdiction. They conclude by emphasizing the evidence of over $20 million received by the Biden family.

The speaker discusses the Biden family's alleged involvement in an influence peddling scheme, suggesting that they were dispersing money to other family members to make it appear as though their numbers were lower. They claim to have found no legitimate business dealings on the Biden end, only influence peddling. The speaker questions whether Hunter Biden and other family members will be indicted and speculates on the challenges the Department of Justice may face in doing so. They mention that there are six decisions made by Biden that allegedly helped China and state that they will provide more information on this later. The speaker also criticizes Biden's soft stance on China and suggests that he may be compromised due to his family's financial ties to the Chinese Communist Party.

The speaker discusses the Biden family's alleged web of concealment and deception, suggesting corruption. They claim that the Biden family lacks a legitimate business structure and instead relies on politics for income. The speaker highlights the numerous companies and transactions involved, expressing concern about the velocity and purpose of these transactions. They mention reviewing documents at the treasury building, which raised serious questions. The speaker emphasizes the creation of multiple companies during Joe Biden's vice presidency and suggests that the purpose is to conceal money gained through his political career. They provide examples of various company names and assert that such a structure serves no legitimate purpose. The speaker also questions the Department of Justice's investigation into Hunter Biden and asserts that the former president had a legitimate business, unlike Joe Biden. The speaker concludes by stating that the committee will continue to investigate and present the facts.

Joe Biden is accused of using pseudonyms and setting up fake companies to receive wire transfers from foreign nationals while he was vice president. The alleged payments, totaling $21 million, were funneled into at least 9 family members' bank accounts. The investigation reveals more pseudonyms, shell companies, and wire transfers each week. The emails suggest that Joe Biden used a pseudonym to communicate with his son and assure him that help was on the way when he was being pressured by Burisma. The timing of these alleged actions occurred while Biden was vice president, raising concerns about his integrity and potential compromise as president. The evidence suggests the need for an impeachment inquiry.

In this video, the speaker accuses President Biden of lying about his involvement in his son Hunter Biden's business dealings. They claim that the Biden family business is Joe Biden's political career and present evidence of alleged illegal business transactions involving the president. The speaker highlights instances where money was transferred between Hunter Biden, his associates, and family members, suggesting corruption and pay-for-play tactics. They also criticize Hunter Biden for not registering as a foreign agent despite his work with a Chinese energy company. The speaker calls for an impeachment investigation into President Biden's alleged corruption and questions whether he is compromised by foreign sources.

President Biden's denial of discussing businesses with Hunter Biden's associates is called a lie by the speaker. The investigation has allegedly uncovered evidence of Joe Biden's involvement in illegal business transactions. Examples include James Biden receiving a loan based on his last name and wiring money to Joe Biden, and an email mentioning "the big guy" receiving a 10% stake in a joint venture. The speaker also accuses Hunter Biden of not registering as a foreign agent despite his work with a Chinese energy company. The speaker calls for an impeachment investigation into President Biden's alleged corruption and pay-for-play tactics. They claim that the confusion surrounding Biden's business transactions was intentional to hide money from the American people and the IRS. The speaker questions if the president is compromised by foreign sources and suggests an impeachment inquiry is necessary to answer these questions.

The speaker criticizes the Biden family, stating that they have no business experience except for politics. They claim that the oversight committee, along with other committees, has uncovered evidence of public corruption and a pay-for-play scheme involving foreign nations, resulting in millions of dollars. The speaker mentions that Hunter Biden ignored a congressional subpoena as a private citizen, which would typically result in contempt and punishment. They argue that private citizens have a responsibility to answer congressional subpoenas and suggest that Hunter Biden should be held in contempt by the full House of Representatives. The speaker concludes by yielding back their time.

The speaker discusses the analogy of a criminal ordering a hit and how it relates to the impeachment inquiry of Joe Biden. They claim that Joe Biden was involved in his family's business schemes in Romania while he was president. They mention that Biden delivered an anti-corruption speech in Romania and had discussions with the Romanian president about anti-corruption efforts. They also highlight that the Biden family received money from a corrupt Romanian oligarch through a company called Bladen Enterprises. They mention Hunter Biden's meetings with the US ambassador to Romania and the flow of over $1,000,000 to the Bidens.

The speaker discusses the potential crimes committed by the Bidens in relation to their dealings with China. They mention that the Bidens could be charged as unregistered foreign agents, potentially involved in bribery, wire fraud, money laundering, and racketeering. The speaker finds it insulting that these actions have not been reported. They believe that Joe Biden's involvement borders on treason and that he has not been honest about his family's financial dealings. The ongoing investigation aims to uncover the truth and reveal Joe Biden's role in receiving the money. The speaker concludes that Joe's claim of having no knowledge is a blatant lie.

Hunter Biden's privilege and questionable actions are the focus here. The speaker criticizes President Biden and the media for not addressing Hunter's privilege, despite lecturing about privilege and injustice. Hunter's wealth and connections are attributed to his father, rather than his own abilities. The speaker also highlights the sleazy behavior surrounding Hunter and the Biden family, suggesting that it should concern fair-minded individuals. They argue that evidence shows President Biden was aware of and enabled Hunter's actions, benefiting from them. The speaker calls for justice and transparency, expressing concern about the compromised state of the US attorney investigating the matter.

Speaker 1 states that the Biden family engaged in influence peddling, resulting in tens of millions of dollars. He claims his legitimate businesses became illegitimate through alignment with Hunter Biden, which involved selling the "Biden name." Speaker 1 alleges that Joe Biden was aware and involved, citing his participation in at least two business phone calls. He asserts that Joe Biden's claim of never discussing foreign business deals with his son or brother is a lie, supported by documents and evidence. Speaker 1 further alleges that Joe Biden negotiated with the Chinese Communist Party on a golf course to secure a board seat and receive money from the Chinese. He references a WhatsApp message and a billion dollars in Ukraine, conditioned on removing a prosecutor investigating Hunter.

The speaker mentions that a foreign national who allegedly bribed Joe and Hunter Biden has audio recordings of his conversations with them. There are 17 recordings in total, with 15 being phone calls between the foreign national and Hunter Biden, and 2 being phone calls between the foreign national and then vice president Joe Biden. These recordings were kept as an insurance policy by the foreign national. It is suggested that Joe Biden may have been involved in employing Hunter Biden. The speaker questions why the Justice Department and FBI haven't focused on the Biden family like they did with former president Trump. The relevance of these recordings to a bribery scheme is highlighted.