reSee.it - Related Video Feed

John Watt, a COVID vaccine-injured individual, expresses his frustration and pain, highlighting the lack of support for those affected by the vaccine. He questions why the authorities have neglected the thousands of people suffering adverse reactions. The Prime Minister acknowledges John's concerns and promises to investigate individual cases through the existing compensation scheme. He emphasizes that decisions regarding the vaccine rollout were based on medical advice and that they are committed to addressing any shortcomings. John's voice is muffled, preventing viewers from hearing his full story. The Prime Minister encourages John to share his details with the team for further investigation.

My son loved hockey and got vaccinated despite his fear of needles. He experienced severe symptoms after the shot and passed away shortly after. The doctor failed to properly diagnose him. I want the truth about vaccine deaths and closure for my son. Another doctor confirmed that the vaccine caused his death. Many others have similar stories, and we need to address the issue of vaccine injuries.

The speaker states that the NIH has a division devoted to studying long COVID and figuring out cures. They are also incorporating an agency within the CDC that will specialize in vaccine injuries. These issues, along with Lyme disease, are priorities because more and more people are suffering from these injuries. The speaker claims they are committed to having gold standard science to figure out what the treatments are and deliver the best treatments possible.

Speaker 0: Because there was such a mass vaccination campaign with a product that, you know, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of people were injured in this process, what work is the NIH doing in terms of research to somehow help these people? Because just from my own experience, my wife and I made a film about this, right? These people were, even though in some cases they were supported a bit by, but mostly just completely gaslit and just, no, your issue doesn't exist. Right? So how are you approaching this? Speaker 1: Well, you're absolutely right. There were absolutely like, lot patients of who were vaccine injured were gaslit, pretending as if they didn't get injured or that somehow their symptoms are all Speaker 1: in their head or something. Actually, this is part of a broader phenomenon, where, you have patients with conditions that are poorly understood, where the medical system will gaslight them leave. They can they're telling you it's a a psychological issue rather than a physical issue. It should make you think that you're crazy because you you you have symptoms that you just, you know you have, but you can't convince anyone else to do anything about it. Injury is one of them, long COVID, MECFS, Lyme chronic Lyme disease, a whole host of these conditions where it just fits a very similar pattern. Speaker 1: The key underlying thing is that there isn't excellent science to guide decision making for clinicians or anybody else, for patients. And I've made sure that people know at the NIH that I'm very interested in investing in answers for patients for all of those. Vaccine injury, long COVID, MECFS, chronic Lyme. We need to get better answers. The the gaslighting happens because the, if you're let's say you're a doctor and you see a patient and you have no idea what's causing their condition. Speaker 1: Right? Because the scientific literature doesn't have an answer. You're gonna be unless you're an amazing doctor who's really good at, you know, sort of being honest and compassionate, you're going to be wanting to, like, move on to the next patient. And, it's really, really unfortunate. The answer is to get good answers, right? Speaker 1: So invest in, research on treatments, on underlying physiology, physiological causes, you know, basic biological knowledge, so that those patients actually can can the doctors and the caregivers for those patients can will treat them correctly. Speaker 0: So but is is NIH doing this for people that are that have been COVID vaccine injures against a huge number of people relatively. Speaker 1: We have investments in that, and we're going have more investments in that at the start, you know, this year. For all of those conditions, I think patients deserve an answer, and I'm definitely, interested in finding I would love to know myself.

Speaker 0 asks if Moderna uses its profits to help people injured by their vaccine. Speaker 1 responds that indemnities are a government policy matter and cannot comment. Speaker 0 clarifies if Moderna is unwilling to take responsibility for the safety of their vaccine. Speaker 1 emphasizes their commitment to vaccine safety but reiterates that indemnities are a matter for policymakers. Speaker 0 questions the moral obligation of Moderna to assist vaccine victims, but Speaker 1 does not provide a direct answer. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 assuming the answer is zero and thanking them.

I'm here with Alexis, who is finally out of the hospital after five long months dealing with the aftermath of a vaccine injury. We are so happy to have her here. She's going to be completing a regenerative program with us. It's an absolute honor to help her recover. I wanted to do this out of the goodness of my heart, and I want nothing back in return other than to see her health restored. We're going to fix everything and get her back on track.

Speaker 0 asks why the president hasn't acknowledged the shooting at CDC headquarters that took place earlier in August where a police officer was killed, and it was reported that the motivation for the shooting was somebody who was really unhappy with the effects of the COVID vaccine. Speaker 1 responds: "We absolutely were very much aware of that shooting. The secretary of health and human services put out a statement immediately. He was in touch with the CDC, and he actually traveled to Georgia, to assess the situation and to mourn, with the the people who work in that building there. So"

It's frustrating trying to make this new vaccine work. I understand the emotions involved; it's tough. Don't cry, everything will be okay.

You need to know the risk profile for products like the COVID vaccine. Many discuss adverse effects, but we lack sufficient data, which is unacceptable. Our surveillance system doesn't work. In 2010, the CDC had the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, meant to detect injuries. However, a CDC study revealed it captures less than 1% of vaccine injuries. This is inexcusable. Congress, the Institute of Medicine, and the National Academy of Sciences have repeatedly directed the CDC to develop a better vaccine surveillance system. We will require it and address it immediately.

COVID vaccines are declared safe by Speaker 0. Speaker 1 expresses pain, trauma, and regret due to lack of help for vaccine injuries. They mention others with amputations and heart conditions, and question why support is lacking. They criticize the vaccine damage payment scheme and highlight over 30,000 adverse reactions in Scotland. Speaker 1 demands that Rashid Shunaka do the right thing. Speaker 0 responds by stating that decisions during the pandemic were based on medical advice from experts, guiding vaccine rollout and eligibility.

I invite Senator Bill Cassidy from Louisiana to review my daughter's autopsy report. He often references hypothetical cases in his speeches, but I want him to see the reality of my 18-year-old daughter, who suffered from severe health issues and ultimately died on November 9, 2022, after receiving the mRNA vaccine he claims is safe. I want him to confront the details of her suffering, including thrombosis and organ damage, and to explain to me why her life was insignificant to him.

We will create a vaccines act to hold vaccine manufacturers accountable for any harm or death caused by their products. Currently, they avoid liability by lobbying the government and MPs to pass laws in their favor. This allows them to distribute toxic vaccines without consequences, leaving the people and taxpayers to suffer. We believe it is crucial to make the manufacturers responsible for their actions, and we will ensure that they are held liable.

John Watt, a COVID vaccine-injured individual, expresses his pain and frustration, highlighting the lack of support for those affected by the vaccine. He questions why he had to establish a support group in Scotland for vaccine victims and criticizes the inadequate vaccine damaged payment scheme. The Prime Minister acknowledges John's concerns and promises to address them, mentioning the existence of a compensation scheme. He emphasizes that decisions regarding the vaccine rollout were based on medical advice and encourages John to provide his details for further investigation. The Prime Minister expresses surprise at John's claim of being silenced and assures him that his case will be looked into.

Speaker 0 asks if Moderna puts any of its profits into helping people injured by the vaccine. Speaker 1 states that indemnities are a matter for the government and cannot comment further. Speaker 0 questions if Moderna is unwilling to underwrite the risk of its own vaccine and prioritize its safety. Speaker 1 reiterates that they take vaccine safety seriously and have a good pharmacovigilance process in place, but indemnities are a matter for policymakers. Speaker 0 asks about the moral responsibility of helping vaccine victims, to which Speaker 1 does not provide a direct answer. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 assuming the answer is zero.

We represent three groups advocating for those affected by COVID vaccine injuries and bereavements: UK CV Family, Vaccine Injured and Bereaved UK, and the Scottish Vaccine Injury Group. Our inquiry highlights the need to acknowledge the real experiences of those impacted, who are neither anti-science nor anti-vaccine. We urge the inquiry to examine the production, regulation, and rollout of vaccines, including the communication of risks and the adequacy of post-rollout monitoring. Many individuals faced disbelief and stigma when reporting symptoms, and the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme is inadequate. Urgent reform is necessary to support the injured and bereaved, as their experiences must inform future vaccination programs. The inquiry must listen to these voices and propose meaningful changes to ensure better care and support for those affected.

I am Marcel de Graaf, Member of the European Parliament for Forum for Democracy. I recently sent a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) regarding the approval of medications in the European market, specifically questioning the COVID-19 vaccines. We have received a response that clarifies many issues. This response is highly critical of the vaccination policy in the Netherlands. I will provide more details in a press conference tomorrow at 3 PM via a livestream from Strasbourg. The EMA's response confirms that Forum for Democracy's criticism of the vaccination policy is justified.

COVID vaccines are declared safe by Speaker 0. Speaker 1 expresses pain, trauma, and regret due to lack of help for vaccine injuries. They mention people with amputations and heart conditions, and question why they had to set up a support group in Scotland. They criticize the vaccine damage payment scheme and state that over 30,000 people in Scotland have had adverse reactions to the vaccine. Speaker 1 demands that Rashid Shunaka start doing the right thing. Speaker 0 responds by saying that decisions regarding the vaccine were made based on medical advice from experts.

The speaker states that many people have been injured by the COVID vaccine, some fatally or permanently disabled, and that these people are not receiving sufficient care or attention. The speaker says that the 1986 Vaccine Act is a major impediment to change. According to the speaker, Congress recognized that vaccines were "unavoidably unsafe" when it granted vaccine companies immunity, so it created a federal program with a trust fund to compensate those injured. The program is funded by a 75% surcharge on every vaccine. The speaker says the vaccine court is supposed to be generous and fast, but the speaker believes the lawyers defaulted to protecting the trust fund instead of taking care of people. The speaker says the program has paid out over $5 billion to about 12,000 people. The speaker says they are looking at ways to enlarge the program so that COVID vaccine-injured people can be compensated, including enlarging the statute of limitations.

I want to clarify my stance on vaccines. First, vaccines, like all drugs, have side effects that can harm some individuals. There's no vaccine that is universally safe and effective for everyone. Vaccine injuries deserve attention, just like rare diseases. The public health community has often ignored concerns about vaccine side effects, which is disappointing. I believe vaccine manufacturers should be held legally accountable for their products, as they currently have immunity from lawsuits. Additionally, individuals must have the freedom to choose what goes into their bodies. The Nuremberg Code emphasizes informed consent, which is crucial. As president, I will ensure vaccines are safer, hold the industry accountable, and protect personal choice. If you support these ideas, visit Kennedy24.com to learn more about my plans.

My name is Cody Flint, an agricultural pilot injured by the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. I've always wanted to be a pilot and take pride in my work. It's frustrating that my situation isn't being studied because it doesn't fit the narrative. The damage to my family in 13 months is significant. People like me deserve help after being misled by the government. It's wrong to make people go through this.

"And, you know, we're not here to judge anyone that did take a shot." "And in fact, what we need to focus on now is government funding, NIH funding for those who did and are still suffering." "There are a lot of people left in the wake of this program." "However, I think these bold moves give us basically fodder for the cannon to continue to fire and say, look, we will work on better science, better technology, but let's not forget those who were harmed by this." "And we need to focus on better technologies, not gene therapies that go to every cell in the body, not gene therapies for respiratory viruses." "As the secretary said, look, we're for good science. We're not trying to pull everybody's vaccine away from them, but we're not gonna allow them to take unsafe ones."

I spoke with a congressperson who mentioned getting Guillain Barre from a flu vaccine. When discussing vaccination, it's crucial to address concerns and focus on the benefits, data, and safety of the COVID vaccine. Listening to people's worries is essential.

There are potential side effects in vaccinations, and some people have gotten very sick from them. However, I am not forcing anyone to get vaccinated. Instead, I am providing incentives and protections to encourage Canadians to get vaccinated.

I was coerced into getting the COVID vaccine despite being healthy and against it. After receiving the vaccine, I ended up in the ICU paralyzed with a rare neurological disorder. Lack of family visits led to a pressure wound. Despite the benefits of vaccines, they can cause harm. We should have the right to refuse medical interventions without facing discrimination. I urge the committee to vote yes on 83/19.

The speaker received a letter from the officer's office requesting a report on the COVID response. The government accepted a certain amount of risk regarding the long-term efficacy and side effects of vaccines. There was a discussion about vaccine injuries and compensation, with one person mentioning that there is a system in place through ACC for managing such cases. The conversation then shifted to personal experiences and frustrations with the lack of acknowledgement and compensation for vaccine injuries. The speaker expressed their emotions and mentioned their involvement in the Vaccine Impact Support Network. They thanked someone for being there and admitted to rarely crying about anything.