TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Mathematicians, statisticians, and economists have concluded that the math behind Biden's victory is not just statistically improbable, but statistically impossible. Voter turnout in Wisconsin exceeded the historical record by almost 30 percentage points, with odds of this occurring at 0.0000189% or 1 in 52,000,000. This deviation is considered a virtual statistical impossibility. Biden also fails a test for detecting election fraud used by the state department and forensic accountants. Additionally, there is a record number of 90-year-olds registered to vote in Pennsylvania during a pandemic, surpassing any previous year.

The speaker claims that a sudden increase of 138,000 votes for Biden is statistically improbable due to its linear movement and the absence of any votes for Trump. They argue that in any location with that many voters, at least some votes would be expected for the opposing candidate. The speaker suggests this anomaly occurred around 4:30 AM, followed by another at 6:23 AM. They also find it inexplicable that Nevada suddenly stopped counting votes in the middle of the day, contrary to typical election procedures.

Joe Biden's vote count seems implausible, as he supposedly received 15 million more votes than Barack Obama, yet we didn't gain net House seats after losing the presidency. We also lost 19 out of 20 bellwether races. There are claims of fraudulent ballots from non-existent voters, which raises questions about the integrity of the election process. Trump announced his lead in Philadelphia late at night, but counting was allegedly stopped, only to resume early the next morning, resulting in a shift in the vote count. This situation has led to suspicions about the counting process and transparency during the election.

3% of pre-election voting ballots were altered using HAMR and ScoreCard software, potentially impacting the national vote. An algorithm was used to adjust votes for Biden in specific areas, like Michigan where a glitch favored Trump by 55100 votes in one district. Similar issues are suspected in other states with thousands of ballots appearing for Biden, statistically implausible.

Around 80-90% of the votes seemed to be going to Joe Biden, which made me increasingly uneasy as the day went on. Every time I saw another batch of votes, it was all for Biden. This seemed statistically impossible to me.

There were odd patterns in the ballots, with repeated anomalies over multiple days. Some ballots had a pattern of 7 for Biden and 1 for Trump, which is statistically unlikely. The patterns were reported, but it's unclear if they were included in the final report. The physical recount aligned with the claimed numbers, but behind the scenes, there were over 17,000 duplicate mail-in ballots. The audit suggests that over 60,000 counted ballots may be illegal, which could significantly impact the election outcome. Voting is considered the most important right in the United States, and having it stolen is devastating.

President Trump won so many votes that he blew up the algorithm created before the election to shave votes from Trump and give them to Biden. There is direct evidence of this happening in multiple counties and states, and it happened across the country. Thousands of ballots moved from one state to another in the middle of the night to backfill the machines, perpetrating fraud. Evidence has been uploaded to defendingtherepublic.org.

The 2020 election had 9,000 updates, with 4 extreme updates that had a less than 1 tenth of one percent chance of happening. These updates were argued to be human errors, but if they were corrected, where is the evidence? Some claim that the spikes indicate heavily democratic precincts, but California doesn't show similar spikes. The strangest anomaly is a consistent ratio of Biden to Trump votes across time, which seems theoretically impossible. This pattern appears in many states, suggesting a computer algorithm called weighted race distribution is involved. Diebold voting machines, known for giving values to votes, have been linked to vote switching in past elections. Dominion Voting Systems acquired Diebold's software. Eyewitness and video evidence in Georgia shows a poll worker named Ruby in a backroom filled with absentee ballots.

The Democratic Party worked hard and raised significant funds, with strong candidates. However, Trump garnered substantial support, particularly from white males, and had notable backing from Latino and Black men. This unique combination contributed to his victory. While Democrats put in effort, the situation was unprecedented, especially with a Black woman on the ticket. It's acknowledged that race and gender play important roles in American politics, but they may not be the sole factors. There seems to be a perception that Democrats assumed simply opposing Trump would be enough. Bernie Sanders highlighted that the party's focus has shifted away from advocating for working people, which used to be its core identity.

In the early hours of November 4, 2020, Joe Biden received major vote spikes in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia, putting him in the lead. These spikes occurred during a 5-hour window when counting reportedly had stopped. The updates in question did not follow typical patterns and were particularly extreme. For example, in Michigan, Biden received 141,258 votes compared to Trump's 5,968 votes in a single update. A similar situation occurred in Wisconsin, where Biden went from trailing by over 100,000 votes to taking the lead with a single update. In Georgia, Biden received 136,155 votes while Trump only received 29,115 votes in another update. These spikes were larger than the margin of victory in all three states. Critics argue that these spikes were human errors, but there is no evidence to support this claim.

There were 138,000 votes that came in all at once, and they all went to Biden, which is statistically improbable. In any election, even in the most Democratic areas, you'd expect some votes for the opposing candidate. This situation raises concerns about the counting process, especially since it appears this spike occurred around 4:30 AM. Additionally, Nevada has unexpectedly stopped counting votes during the day, which is illogical and raises further questions about the transparency of the process. It’s unusual for counting to halt when there should still be workers tallying votes.

The speaker stated: "I estimated that somewhere between 80-90% were going to Joe Biden." "Throughout the day, it kept making me sicker and sicker." "Every time I saw another Biden, Biden, Biden, and then I'm going through batches." "Batches, 100% of the batches were Biden." "I find that statistically impossible."

Vote totals were altered through digital pre-election ballots using a program called Hammer and software named Scorecard, leading to significant nationwide changes. An algorithm was employed to adjust votes for Biden in specific areas, which explains a computer glitch in Michigan that resulted in a 55,100 vote shift in favor of Trump in one district. This raises concerns that similar software glitches could affect other districts in Michigan. Additionally, there have been reports of hundreds of thousands of ballots appearing exclusively for Biden, which seems statistically improbable.

Voting fraud claims often arise from Republicans when they lose, not when they win. This recent election was a significant comeback, allowing voters to compare back-to-back administrations. Many preferred Trump's policies, such as safe streets, over the Democrats'. In 2020, concerns arose about mail-in voting and lack of signature verification in states like Pennsylvania. The Democrats need to understand why 10 million voters who supported Biden didn't show up for Harris. Trump's numbers remained strong, while Democrats struggled due to a lack of vision and negative campaigning. Voters reacted against being labeled and targeted legally. Economic issues like gas prices and inflation also influenced their choice to support Trump.

We observed suspicious activity in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Georgia during the election, with trucks arriving late at night. Despite attempts to manipulate the counting process, Trump supporters were present to challenge these actions. Ultimately, Trump won, and there are ongoing concerns about election integrity. Questions remain about who funded mail trucks and the handling of ballots in various states. The polling data showed a significant shift to the right, yet Republicans didn't gain as many seats as expected. The establishment seems to be struggling with this new reality, and there's a call for a stronger focus on election integrity moving forward. The political landscape is shifting, with many voters awakening to the issues at hand, indicating a potential realignment in future elections.

In this video, the speaker discusses a statistical anomaly in a race where ballots were sorted into groups of 200. Out of 61 groups, 58 favored Biden by 90% or more, while 3 favored Trump by the same margin. This suggests that someone or a group of people may have manipulated the ballots, resulting in a significant imbalance in favor of one candidate over the other in a race that was supposed to be evenly split.

- Speaker 0 asserts that mail-in ballots are corrupt and that a Republican-led effort will end mail-in ballots, including drafting an executive order by “the best lawyers in the country.” They claim the U.S. is nearly the only country using mail-in ballots and cite “massive fraud all over the place,” arguing that secure, paper-ballot elections with watermarking would produce faster results (claims that paper ballots provide results the same night, whereas machines allegedly take two weeks). - The conversation references a specific election night anomaly: a block of 138,000 votes (Speaker 1 and Speaker 2 confirm “138,000” votes) all reportedly voting for Biden with no Trump votes in that segment, described as inexplicable and not consistent with expected linear reporting. They note the timing as around 04:30–06:30 in the morning and suggest the results should not be linear given numerous counters reporting across states. They also complain that Nevada stopped counting mid-day, calling it inexplicable and illogical. - Speaker 4 claims a counting software glitch caused a 6,000-vote swing in a county, where ballots counted for Democrats were miscalculated for Republicans; she states that 47 counties use the same software. - Speaker 5 demonstrates concerns about voting-machine security: he shows how a bad actor could gain full admin access in under two minutes by opening a device, removing the card reader, and bypassing error messages, implying easy manipulation of tabulation in 18 states using the machine. - Speaker 6 describes observed ballot processing irregularities: a ballot-stuffing environment where ballots are stamped and filled in rapidly at the top of tickets, with security oversight present but gaps noted in workflow. - Speaker 7 discusses absentee/mail-in ballots with suspicions about sequence numbers: numbers appeared almost sequential, suggesting they could not be from mailed-in ballots, as mailed ballots typically arrive at different numbers; they note there was no date on envelopes and that some details would not be in poll books or the system, alleging irregularities in how ballots were handled. - Speaker 8 reports ongoing theft of duplicate ballots: a table for duplicates existed, but ballots were copied and redistributed at various tables, with duplicates not fully processed and ballots stashed under boxes; the speaker claims this occurred throughout the night. - Speaker 9 recounts a local media denial of fraud at the TCF center, contrasted with video obtained later showing a van delivering ballots after hours; she describes escort cars, a back-and-forth of ballots, and suggests the presence of unobserved ballots and a lack of witnesses during tabulation. She notes that the video was shared publicly and led to the suspension of a social-media account. - Speaker 10 provides a timeline from October 21, detailing a driver delivering mail-in ballots from New York to Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and then to Lancaster, with the driver faced hours of waiting, lack of slips, and unclear purpose for moving the load; the driver states that this was the only time he transported mail-in ballots and expresses a belief in the importance of honest elections for Americans.

Joe Biden could not have received more votes than Barack Obama, and it’s improbable that we lost the presidency while gaining 12 House seats. We didn’t win 19 out of 20 bellwether races and still lose. There were fraudulent ballots created for non-existent voters, which is why envelopes were discarded. Trump announced he was leading by 800,000 votes in Philadelphia, insisting they wouldn’t be blocked from counting. There was confusion when it was suggested counting would stop for the night, but when counting resumed the next morning, the results changed, indicating a shift in the outcome.

3% of pre-election voting ballots were changed using the HAMR and ScoreCard software programs, potentially causing a significant nationwide shift in the vote. An algorithm was also used to calculate additional votes for Mr. Biden in specific areas, like Michigan, where a computer glitch resulted in a 5,500 vote change in favor of President Trump in one district. Similar issues may have occurred in other states. Hundreds of thousands of ballots mysteriously appeared for Mr. Biden, which defies statistical probability.

I estimated that around 80-90% of the ballots I observed were for Joe Biden, which seemed statistically impossible. In traditionally conservative neighborhoods like Cobb County, Georgia, we don't typically see a 100% Biden vote, yet the military ballots in those areas were between 80-90% Biden. Fulton County reported 93% of military ballots for Biden, which also seemed statistically impossible.

Around 80-90% of the votes seemed to be going to Joe Biden, which made me increasingly uneasy as the day went on. Every time I saw another batch of votes, it was all for Biden. This seemed statistically impossible to me.

The speaker discusses how the vote total may have been altered through the HAMMER program and ScoreCard software, affecting the election outcome. They mention a computer glitch in Michigan that favored President Trump, suggesting similar issues in other states. They question the sudden appearance of thousands of ballots for Biden, deeming it statistically improbable.

Speaker 0 presents a video focused on data and evidence of alleged irregularities in the 2020 election, asserting that there has been no comprehensive place to see widespread fraud until now. He states the video is “pure data” and invites viewers to consider the statistical anomalies in three states (Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia) in the early hours of 11/04/2020, when Biden received major vote spikes after trailing Trump. - He analyzes 8,954 individual vote updates and identifies a clear statistical pattern across nearly all updates, with four notably aberrant updates: two in Michigan, one in Wisconsin, and one in Georgia, all occurring in the same five-hour window in the middle of the night when counting reportedly stopped in some places. - In Michigan, a 06:30AM update shows Biden at 141,258 votes to Trump’s 5,968, described as the most extreme update in all datasets across all states, followed by a noticeable ratio change in nearby updates. In Wisconsin, a single update allegedly moved Biden from trailing by over 100,000 votes into the lead. In Georgia, a 01:34AM Eastern Time update shows Biden at 136,155 to Trump’s 29,115. They claim these four spikes exceed the states’ margins of victory, making the spikes not only abnormal by percentage but also by magnitude. They conclude that if these four unlikely updates had not happened, the presidency could have been different. - Detractors are cited as arguing human error, but the video questions where evidence of corrections is, and notes that California shows only one anomalous update in percentage, not enough magnitude to shift outcomes. - A “consistently identical ratio of Biden to Trump votes across time” is highlighted as allegedly impossible, with a Florida example showing 100 identical ratios over several days. The video asserts a computer algorithm is involved, termed a weighted race distribution, associated with Diebold voting machines (known as early as 2001), implying values rather than simple counts. - In California, a single update is shown with Biden receiving about 65% and Trump 32% for one vote, raising questions about how one vote could go to more than one candidate. Speaker 0 then links these patterns to alleged connections between Diebold and Dominion Voting Systems, claiming Dominion acquired ESNS in 2010, which had previously acquired Diebold, and that Dominion’s software is licensed from Smartmatic. They also note that forensic audits show errors and that the mainstream narrative claims these issues are misinformation. They reference NBC News and PBS findings on how easy it is to hack voting machines or cast fake votes. Next, Speaker 0 notes eyewitness and video evidence from Georgia: poll worker Ruby allegedly was filmed in the backroom with absentee ballots, and at 10:30PM on November 3, media and poll watchers were told to leave, yet Ruby and others remained, pulling ballots from under a table and distributing them to counting stations. They describe Ruby running the same stack of ballots to the machine three times, observing a large Biden surge after 01:34AM Georgia time, and question whether a ballot can be counted more than once, citing Coffey County, Georgia as an example of someone claiming to scan the same batches repeatedly. Speaker 0 references Raquel Rodriguez, arrested for election fraud in Texas over video evidence of ballot harvesting, and asserts that cybersecurity evidence indicates Dominion and Edison Research used an unencrypted VPN with easily accessible credentials allowing foreign access, asserting that China, Iran, and other countries accessed the servers, contradicting claims that Dominion machines were not connected to the Internet. They mention Dominion’s association with a Chinese-registered domain, and board members with Chinese nationality, alleging conflicts of interest through corporate ownership and licensing from Smartmatic. Speaker 0 highlights that Antrim County, Michigan audits found high error and adjudication rates in Dominion, with an 68 o 5% error rate far above federal guidelines, missing logs for 2020, and reprogramming of election event designer cards during the safe harbor period. They point to subpoenas and the lack of access to logs, and to affidavits from poll workers claiming illegal activities, non-equal treatment of observers, counting without proper oversight, shredding ballots, and other irregularities. Speaker 7 concludes with a claim that many Americans distrust the 2020 election and urges viewers to download and share the video, demand election reform, and notes that the video’s credits will continue with data readers, while warning of erasure or fact checks by tech platforms.