TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The SAVE Act, requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration, passed the House with every Republican and four Democrats voting for it, while 98% of Democrats voted against it, despite 84% of Americans supporting voter ID. One argument against voter ID is that it suppresses voting among elderly, poor, and minority groups, echoing post-slavery laws. Obtaining a valid ID can cost $10-$30, and updating documents or traveling to ID offices can be inconvenient. Recently, it was revealed that Social Security numbers were given to millions of illegal immigrants, and thousands of them were found on voter rolls and had voted. While voter ID has cons, the pros outweigh them. Subsidizing IDs for low-income people and acknowledging that voting is a shared inconvenience for all citizens could be solutions. The opposition to voter ID may stem from partisan politics, but politicians should prioritize the will of the people over party loyalty.

According to the speaker, Gavin Newsom signed a document that makes it a crime to ask a voter for identification. The speaker believes this action indicates a desire to cheat on elections. The speaker claims that while identification is required for other activities, it is now virtually a crime to ask for it when voting, which the speaker considers the most important act. The speaker asserts the only reason for this is to enable election cheating and insists this should not be allowed to happen.

I'm heading out to vote on the Lake and Riley Act, which addresses the tragic case of a young girl in Georgia who was murdered by an illegal immigrant. This bill mandates that the Department of Homeland Security detain illegal immigrants charged with crimes like burglary and theft. It also allows state attorneys general to sue the DHS for not adhering to this requirement. Unfortunately, I expect most Democrats to oppose this common-sense legislation. It's crucial for voters to consider the character of those they support. By the way, President Carter's body will soon be lying in state. Thank you for your support.

The speaker discusses the Save Act, claiming Democrats want illegal immigrants to vote. They recount a colleague's experience at the Texas border where 9 illegals crossed undetected. The speaker emphasizes the need for accurate reporting of illegal crossings and supports the Save Act to prevent non-citizens from voting in federal elections. They urge Democrats to justify opposing the legislation.

A bill exists that would require states to upgrade their elections infrastructure. The best and most secure way to conduct voting is with paper ballots. Russia can't hack a piece of paper. It would be beneficial if the Republican leader would put these bills on the floor for a vote.

The claim is that 69 million married women won't be able to vote if they took their husband's name, disenfranchising voters. Voters want ID, signature verification, chain of custody controls, and updated voter rolls. They also want partisan observers watching the voting process. The only reason to be against these measures is if you want illegal aliens to vote in large numbers. Every other country requires an ID to vote. The idea that married women, a Republican voting demographic, can't get ID is a dumb talking point. The REAL ID Act creates an ID at the DMV that proves citizenship. Democrats want illegal aliens to vote. The Biden administration gave millions of illegal aliens Social Security numbers, making it easy to vote, collect welfare, and get free government benefits. They want illegals to steal elections.

The speaker argues against the SAVE Act, claiming it would cause gridlock and is a pernicious, nasty piece of legislation described as “Jim Crow two point o.” They allege the SAVE Act would cause more than 20,000,000 people to lose their right to vote, requiring registration with a passport or original birth certificate, and would eliminate vote by mail. The speaker criticizes senior citizens confined to homes by wheelchair, suggesting they would lose their right to vote under the Act. They warn that the voter rolls would be purged using an AI system “set up by Musk and Doge,” so people could show up at the polling place only to be told they’re not on the rolls and would not be notified. The speaker emphasizes that millions would be purged from the rolls because of this system, and voters would be denied notice and turned away at polling sites. The rhetoric likens the measure to one of the nastiest pieces of legislation, returning to the Old South where people were prohibited from voting and spreading it across America. Additionally, the speaker references President Trump’s stance, stating that Trump says he will not sign any legislation until Congress passes Doge, and asserts that “we ain’t passing Doge.” The broader point is that this stance would provoke gridlock in Congress and prevent passage of bills that could lower costs for prescription drugs and electricity.

I prioritize the preservation of American democracy and believe in free and fair elections. There is a dangerous extremist movement in America that threatens our democracy. We must all take action to protect it, as history, the world, and future generations are watching. The vice president and I have been advocating for voting rights since the beginning of our administration, and I urge all Americans to join us in this cause. We are a nation of possibilities, where the power lies with the people. Together, there is nothing we cannot achieve. Paid for by the...

Speaker 0 discusses the likelihood of achieving 60 votes and questions whether the situation is merely a show. He acknowledges uncertainty, noting, “We don't know that we don't have 60 votes yet,” and counters the assumption that there aren’t even 51 votes by saying, “Multiple members of your conference say that there aren't even 51 votes.” He cautions against assuming Democrats won’t be won over, stating, “you're making an assumption that at the end of this debate that none of the Democrats will be won over,” but he also concedes the possibility that none will be won over. Despite the uncertainty, he argues that the debate on the floor of the Senate is important and that the issue is at the core of elections in the United States. He asserts that the American people care about this issue and that constituents have raised it frequently, making it a significant topic to discuss publicly. He believes it is important to have the fight and the debate, regardless of how it ends. A central point he emphasizes is the defense of the position requiring citizenship to participate in voting processes. He states, “at the end of the day, I just don't know how you defend a position that you need to be a citizen in this country, not only to register a vote, but also to be able to show an ID when you vote.” He wonders how long Democrats will defend that position and reiterates the possibility that none of them will be won over. Nevertheless, he reiterates the value of the Senate floor debate, indicating that the process itself is important.

Non-citizens are not allowed to vote under federal law, but the Biden-Harris administration and some states are undermining this. The SAVE Act, requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration, was blocked by Democrats in the Senate. The wide-open border, with an estimated 16 million illegal aliens in the country, raises concerns about non-citizen voting. Some house races are decided by very few votes, so illegal participation could be decisive. California's ballot harvesting and Wisconsin's unmanned ballot boxes in public parks are also seen as opening the door to fraud. The speaker believes Republicans will win the House, Senate, and White House.

The speaker advocates for a return to paper ballots, stating Russia cannot hack them. The speaker contrasts this with Kamala Harris.

Speaker 0 outlines two priorities: first, go after welfare fraud and rewrite how programs work by requiring states to send biometrics to the federal government proving that the person exists and they're eligible for the services in question, with a focus on fraud “rampant in Minnesota and throughout these blue states through reconciliation.” Second, implement an affordability package to make America more affordable for the hardworking men and women of the country.

This proposal is a serious matter. People who register and vote illegally disenfranchise actual US citizens. The speaker objects to the suggestion that their motive is to disingenuously sow fear and uncertainty about election legitimacy, calling the accusation inaccurate and lacking proof. The speaker believes there is ample reason to bring the proposal forward and expresses deep disappointment that it cannot pass. It is not too much to ask to put teeth into existing laws stating that only US citizens can vote in US elections. The House passed it, and the Senate could pass it now. It is inexcusable not to.

House Republicans will continue to push the Save Act, which aims to ensure legal and constitutional elections. Republicans claim nearly every Democrat opposes the Save Act and wants "illegals" to vote. They intend to include secure elections as part of government funding discussions. Republicans will fight for this principle along with border security. Chuck Schumer has failed to put anything on the floor to ensure only legal American citizens are able to vote and has refused to pass HR 2, the Secure the Border Act, to return to Trump's border policies. Kamala Harris owns the economic, national security, and humanitarian open border crisis that her policies created.

On election day, imagine heading to the polls while Donald Trump, convicted of felonies, won't be able to vote. If we deny reality as a party, we'll end up with four more years of Joe Biden. When my colleagues supported Trump even if he was a felon, they confirmed his lies to the American people. Timidity in taking on Trump will be sensed by others like Xi, Putin, the Ayatollah, border cruisers, and criminals in our streets, who will take advantage of this failure of leadership. We need to embrace the old American idea that every person, including the president, is responsible for their own conduct. As president, I will work for the people, earning their trust and votes. Thank you, governor.

We need to stop mail-in applications and ballots because we don't have the means to control them in the United States. Additionally, drop boxes are causing problems and should be eliminated. Some states will still have drop boxes funded by Zuckerberg for the midterms, while others won't. Georgia, for example, will keep drop boxes but move them inside buildings.

Republicans in Congress are allegedly playing a game by not codifying Trump's executive orders into law. They have the power to make Trump's actions permanent through legislation now, with majorities in both the House and Senate, but they haven't. Instead, they are supposedly waiting until the midterms to campaign on the promise of turning Trump's agenda into law if reelected. The speaker believes this is a ploy to prioritize reelection over serving the American people. The speaker hopes voters elect Democrats to overrule the Republicans. The speaker accuses members of Congress of being bought by special interests and caring more about their careers than the needs of the country. They urge voters to remember that Republicans could act now but are choosing not to for political gain.

Speaker 1 outlines a plan to revisit all 50 states and 'clean up voter rolls' and 'ensure as best they can that people are citizens when they're registering to vote in a federal election.' He notes letters have been sent to states under two statutes: 'Help America Vote Act' and 'NVRA, National Voter Registration Act.' States must maintain data, keep rules up to date, and have procedures for federal registrations to safeguard citizenship. He says many states are 'sloppy, cutting corners, not doing this, certainly not doing the list maintenance required,' and not properly ensuring people are on the rolls. The goal is that 'every citizen, whatever their party, whatever their views are, they should feel confident in the outcome of the election.'

The speaker claims the Biden-Harris administration and some states are undermining election integrity, not them. Federal law prohibits non-citizens from voting, but states have issues. The speaker says the House passed the SAVE Act, requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration, but Chuck Schumer and the Democrats blocked it in the Senate. The speaker alleges the open border policy is a Democratic strategy to enable non-citizen voting. They estimate 16 million illegal aliens are in the country since the border was opened, raising concerns about their potential illegal participation in elections, where some races are decided by very few votes. The speaker also cites California's ballot harvesting and unmanned ballot boxes in Wisconsin as potential sources of fraud.

The speaker discusses a recent vote in the US House of Representatives to defund the National Endowment for Democracy, arguing that this measure is not neutral or benevolent, but a leftist enterprise. The speaker states that leftists are free to contribute to it, but insists that hardworking Americans should not be forced by the government to contribute to causes they find repugnant, including the NED. Despite this stance, the speaker notes that 81 Republican members of the House voted with all the Democrats to keep the funding stream going, funding the enterprise with federal money. The speaker contends that there should be legitimate disagreement within the Republican Party, but asserts that this issue should not be one of them. When campaigning as a Republican, the speaker says, voters expect basic precepts, including that the US government is too big and expensive because it does too many things it was never intended to do. The speaker argues that Republicans should agree that funds should not be taken from hardworking Americans and given to left-leaning enterprises that undercut everything the party stands for or purports to stand for. If viewers share the speaker’s frustration, they are urged to find out how their representative voted and raise the issue with them. The speaker anticipates that some Republicans will blame the outcome on the Senate filibuster, though they claim the Senate filibuster rule should not affect the House. The speaker argues that such blaming is severely exaggerated and emphasizes the importance of ending the zombie filibuster, calling for a speaking filibuster instead of silent or asleep filibustering. With the procedural concerns addressed, the speaker says the party should move on to implementing policies for which Republicans were elected, including reducing federal wasteful spending, ending funding for the National Endowment for Democracy, and passing the SAFE Act. The speaker describes the SAFE Act as something that “like, 80% of all Americans agree with,” which is to take steps to stop noncitizens from voting in elections. The speaker reiterates the admonition to stay true to the Republican Party and not align with another party, ending with a caution: “Don’t get on the other one. And, good heavens, don’t get on a donkey.”

I, of course, want to remove every non eligible voter from our voter rolls. That is not in dispute. I, of course, want to remove every non eligible voter from the voter rolls, especially those who don't support my core values. That is not in dispute.

On day 1, I will sign an executive order to cut federal funding for schools promoting critical race theory, transgender issues, or inappropriate content for children. I will not fund schools with vaccine or mask mandates and will protect women's sports from male participation. Thank you.

The Senator believes the Save Act, requiring proof of citizenship for federal election voting, must come up for a vote in the House and Senate, ideally attached to the next spending bill in September. He claims 3 out of 4 Americans agree only US citizens should vote in federal elections and should prove citizenship when registering, similar to the I-9 form for new jobs. The Senator hopes Mike Johnson will attach the Save Act to a continuing resolution to highlight the contrast between parties. He questions whether Chuck Schumer would risk a government shutdown to allow non-citizens, including 10 million illegal immigrants, to potentially influence the election outcome.