reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 accuses the person of being a liar and corrupt, demanding their resignation. Speaker 1 adds that nobody trusts them and many Canadians have suffered due to their lies and corruption. They call for justice for the dead and blame the person for policies that perpetuate war. Speaker 0 labels them a war criminal and demands they be jailed. They accuse the person of having blood on their hands and being immoral. They emphasize the need to stop the corruption, war machine, and lies. Speaker 0 concludes by calling the person a failure, disgrace, and a terror who cannot show their face in public.

Preliminary findings suggest smoke around most allegations, indicating a serious situation. The board is implicated in terrible ways. Canada's auditor general was initially involved, but nothing was shut down or anyone fired when it became a political problem. The speaker questions the allocation of $220,000 to a company and asks about the date when whistleblower allegations were learned. The chair of the fund directed tax dollars to her own company. The NDP liberal coalition blocked a motion to hear from the whistleblower, raising concerns about government corruption. Conservatives aim to uncover who benefited from the $1 billion slush fund scandal.

Preliminary findings indicate that most of the allegations are credible, leading us to believe the accusers. The government will take action as a result. There are issues of sloppiness and laziness, but some level of competence exists. The situation is currently unsustainable, and the minister will likely react strongly, possibly shutting everything down. It is unlikely that certain board members and executives will be able to continue serving due to a loss of confidence. The focus now is on finding ways to remove them, starting with gaining control of the board and securing a majority vote. The report highlights the board's failure to follow processes, COI regulations, and act as responsible fiduciaries.

The speaker accuses the government of covering up corruption and obstructing a criminal investigation into the prime minister's conduct. They highlight the prime minister's involvement in the SNC Lavalin scandal and his firing of the attorney general. The speaker criticizes the prime minister's ethical violations and claims that he thwarted a criminal investigation. The meeting is abruptly adjourned, angering the speaker who believes the government is trying to protect the prime minister. They mention the use of cabinet confidence to hide information from the RCMP. The speaker concludes that after 8 years, the prime minister is not worth the cost and promises to speak further on the matter.

A video transcript accuses Amarjeet Sohi, a Canadian politician, of corruption and nepotism. It claims that Sohi and his family members have benefited from illegal activities and have concealed their involvement in various companies. The transcript also alleges that Sohi rewarded his campaign managers and agents with lucrative contracts. The video provides a complex diagram showing the connections between Sohi, his family, and the companies involved. The speaker urges further investigation into the matter.

A video transcript accuses Amarjeet Sohi, a former Canadian politician, of corruption and nepotism. The speaker claims that Sohi and his family members benefited from illegal activities and enriched themselves at the expense of taxpayers. The transcript highlights inconsistencies in Sohi's disclosures and suggests that he concealed conflicts of interest. It also mentions a trucking company, White Rock Ventures, and its involvement in alleged corruption. The speaker calls for Sohi to be interrogated and punished for his crimes. The video concludes by urging viewers to support the journalist's work in exposing the truth.

A board member at SDTC funneled $42.5 million of taxpayers' money into companies she had an interest in, enriching herself. Whistleblowers claim corruption and mismanagement at SDTC exceed $150 million. Despite this, no one has been held accountable. The chair resigned, but not at the minister's request, and the minister supports the corrupt SDTC board. The speaker questions why the minister prioritizes protecting liberal insiders who got rich improperly over addressing corruption in the Liberals' green slush fund.

Canada's ethics commissioner is investigating two liberal appointees who allegedly funneled over $600,000 to their own companies from a $1 billion green fund. The whistleblower, who was initially silenced by the government, will testify at a committee hearing. The opposition demands the prime minister reveal how many other Liberal insiders benefited financially. The minister for innovation defends the government's actions, stating they launched an investigation and took remedial measures, with the board chair and CEO resigning. The opposition criticizes the government for their handling of the situation, as the auditor general and ethics commissioner are now investigating. They claim up to $150 million has been embezzled, and question who profited from the fund.

The speaker questions the independence of regulatory agencies like the TGA, suggesting that they may be influenced by pharmaceutical companies that fund them. They criticize the quick adoption of COVID vaccines and the authorization for their use in young Australians, even before approval in the US and Europe. They argue that a Royal Commission is needed to investigate these issues and hold those responsible accountable. The speaker also mentions the Pfizer trials, claiming that there were more deaths in the vaccinated group than in the placebo group. They highlight the large amount of money spent on vaccines and the lack of transparency regarding contracts and terms. They believe that mandating vaccines violates international human rights.

The speaker criticizes the SDTC board executives and senior management for mismanaging taxpayer money and allowing a toxic workplace culture. They also blame the federal government for lacking oversight and covering up the truth. A comprehensive presentation was submitted to the Privy Council Office, revealing mismanagement, noncompliance, conflict of interest breaches, and a toxic culture. Independent investigations found that various funds and COVID payments were improperly distributed, with conflicts of interest involved. The report also highlighted the absence of HR processes and policies. Despite these findings, no consequences were faced by those responsible, and the implicated individuals' names were redacted. The speaker believes their testimony can provide evidence of the lies perpetuated by SDTC and the government.

The speaker expresses disbelief that the Department of Energy under the Biden administration disbursed $93 billion in 76 days between President Trump's election and President Biden taking office. The speaker confirms with an interviewee that these funds were given to entities lacking business plans and financials. The speaker characterizes this as "distasteful" and "confidence undermining."

The speaker presents a detailed, multi-faceted accusation about Mark Carney’s role in a long-running scheme tied to Canada’s net-zero push and the use of public pension funds to de-risk green-energy investment. Key points include: - Mark Carney is portrayed as a central figure who champions net zero and founded The UK’s G Fans in 2019, with capital access claimed to total over $130 trillion. The speaker asserts that net-zero efforts began to collapse when Republican attorneys subpoenaed banks in the U.S. over anti-competition rules, causing JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, and others to exit net zero. - The strategy described is “de-risking green energy investment,” which, according to the speaker, provides guarantees to attract private investment while shifting all liability and cost onto federal funds and taxpayers. The claim is that private investors come in because the project is guaranteed by public money, with no immediate private risk. - Bloomberg is cited as reporting in 2020 that Carney was the unofficial economic advisor to Trudeau; the speaker argues that because Carney’s role is unpaid and unofficial, it does not trigger the Conflict of Interest Act, allowing him to influence Trudeau’s policy with zero consequence. - The three alleged key figures are Christia Freeland (Finance Minister), Justin Trudeau, and Mark Carney. From 2020 to 2025, $190 billion is claimed to have been allotted to de-risk green-energy investment. When GFANS collapses, the $130 trillion figure is said to disappear, leaving pension funds as the only source for such capital. - The Canadian Growth Fund (CGF) is described as created for $15 (presumably a capitalization reference) to de-risk green-energy investment, with Brookfield Growth Transition Fund I/II and the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Fund and PSP Pension Funds named as limited partners. PSP board appointments are described as selected by the treasurer and finance minister, with final approval by the prime minister, and payments to board members alleged to be in the six- to seven-figure range and removable by the prime minister. - A subsidiary called CCFIM is said to manage the Canadian Growth Fund, with Brookfield’s transition fund reportedly totaling $20 billion in the final close of Transition Fund II, plus a separate UAE-linked Catalyst Transition Fund. - The principal “smoking gun” example given is Brookfield’s initial $300 million investment from the transition fund into Entropy Inc., resulting in Brookfield taking a majority stake. This investment allegedly qualifies as a pension fund investment under PSP due to a low-risk profile. The typical Brookfield fee structure is described as 1.5% management fee, with a 5–8% hurdle, a 20% catch-up, and an 80/20 split favoring pension funds after 100% capital return, potentially allowing Carney to receive a 20% carry after a long horizon (up to 10–15 years). - The speaker claims the Canadian Growth Fund used a 15-year de-risking contract guaranteeing $16 million per year and $200 million upfront, shifting all liability, debt, and control to taxpayers, with the completed project potentially owned by a foreign entity and profits accruing to the foreign owner. - A broader allegation is that the UAE commitments and Catalyst Transition Fund contracts are tied to the same de-risking framework, with maximum potential payments described as $750 million to $1.2 billion. - The conclusion presented is that pension and tax money are being leveraged to fund a system that yields net losses while enriching Carney and associated actors, creating a cycle described as a snake eating its tail. The speaker urges readers to look up information, share it, and contact Carney, PSP board members, Freeland, and others to make them aware of these alleged actions.

As EPA Administrator, my top priority is to protect your tax dollars from waste and abuse. A disturbing video revealed a Biden EPA appointee discussing the wasteful spending of billions of tax dollars, likening it to throwing "gold bars" (tax dollars) off the Titanic. My team discovered that roughly $20 billion was parked at an outside financial institution by the Biden EPA, a scheme designed to quickly obligate funds with reduced oversight. This money was awarded to just eight entities, who then distributed it to NGOs with less transparency. Almost $7 billion went to one entity, raising questions about fund allocation and potential conflicts of interest. While there's no suspicion of wrongdoing by the bank, the agreement must be terminated, and the funds returned to the EPA. We'll review all expenditures, refer the matter to the inspector general, and work with the Justice Department to ensure accountability.

The NDP Liberal government's $1 billion green fund is facing corruption allegations. The CEO and the board chair resigned in disgrace, while the auditor general and ethics commissioner are investigating. Whistleblowers claim that $150 million was embezzled by Liberal insiders. The opposition demands answers on where the missing money went and who benefited. The Minister of Innovation defends the government's investment in clean technology and fighting climate change. However, the opposition argues that the Liberals are involved in a despicable act of funneling taxpayers' money to their friends while Canadians struggle. They question if the RCMP will be involved in the investigations.

The speaker questions the Energy Department head about who truly runs the department, suggesting it could be mega-corporations or foreign billionaires funding conferences. The speaker brings up a report that over 130 officials in the energy department reported over 2,700 trades of shares, bonds, and options in companies that ethics officers said was directly related to the agency's work. The speaker reminds the Energy Department head that she previously stated she did not own individual stocks, which the speaker claims was false. The Energy Department head admits she was incorrect and believed she had sold all individual stocks. The speaker points out that the Energy Department head testified she didn't own any individual stocks, but didn't sell the stocks for another month, and waited another month before informing the committee. The speaker asks why she misled them and what she was hiding, also asking if Proterra was one of the stocks. The speaker notes the Energy Department head was on the board of directors at Proterra, made millions in stock options, and promoted Proterra.

Corruption in Canada is alarming. Recent hearings revealed that Annette Vashuran, chair of the Liberals' green fund, was chosen by the prime minister's office despite her connections to companies that had already received over $12 million from the fund she oversees. After her appointment, these companies received an additional $36 million in taxpayer money, highlighting a clear conflict of interest. The green fund is currently under investigation for misappropriating around $150 million, with many similar funds likely facing similar scrutiny. Meanwhile, Canadians are paying more in taxes than for housing, food, and clothing combined, indicating that corrupt politicians are draining resources needed for citizens' basic survival. This situation goes beyond mismanagement; it borders on criminal activity.

The speaker criticizes the SDTC board executives and senior management for mismanaging taxpayer money and allowing a toxic workplace culture. They also blame the federal government for lacking oversight and covering up the truth. A comprehensive presentation was submitted to the Privy Council Office, revealing mismanagement, noncompliance, conflict of interest breaches, and a toxic culture. Independent investigations found that various funds and COVID payments were improperly distributed, totaling around $120 million. The report also exposes the lack of HR processes and policies. Despite these findings, no one has faced consequences, and the implicated individuals' names were protected. The speaker calls for the suspension of SDTC, a new board and management team, and accountability for those responsible. They claim to have evidence supporting their testimony.

Preliminary findings indicate that most of the allegations are credible, leading to a belief in the accusers. The government must take action due to the incompetence and negligence displayed. The minister is likely to react strongly and may consider shutting down operations. The board and executives have lost confidence and will likely be removed. The focus now is on gaining control of the board to proceed with removing the executives. The report highlights the board's failure to follow processes, COI regulations, and act as responsible fiduciaries.

A video transcript accuses Amarjeet Sohi, a former Canadian politician, of concealing conflicts of interest and benefiting financially through illegal means. The transcript highlights inconsistencies in Sohi's disclosures and connections to various companies, including White Rock Ventures. It suggests that Sohi's brothers and their immediate families, as well as his election donors, have profited from illegal activities. The transcript also mentions the involvement of Sohi's campaign manager and the awarding of lucrative contracts. The video calls for Sohi to be interrogated and punished for his alleged crimes. The transcript emphasizes the need for further investigation and support for independent journalism.

The speaker claims that not only the current government, but all previous governments have ignored their warnings about interference. They believe it took so long for this information to come out because of partisan politics and the influence of Chinese intelligence agents. According to the speaker, every prime minister and government office has been compromised, posing a significant security risk for Canadians. They suggest the need for an independent investigation and the implementation of laws similar to Australia's 2017 law against foreign interference to protect the country's future.

During a committee meeting, the speaker accuses the NDP Liberal Coalition of obstructing an invitation to the whistleblower involved in a $1 billion green slush fund scandal. The whistleblower revealed mismanagement and misappropriation of funds, leading to the resignation of the board chair and CEO. The auditor general and ethics commissioner are investigating the matter, including conflicts of interest and gross mismanagement at SDTC. The NDP Liberal Coalition used procedural tricks to prevent a vote on the motion, denying the opportunity to hear from the whistleblower. The speaker, representing the conservatives, expresses their determination to uncover those who benefited from the scandal.

The speaker criticizes the SDTC board executives and senior management for mismanaging taxpayer money and allowing a toxic workplace culture. They also blame the federal government for lacking oversight and covering up the truth. A comprehensive presentation was submitted to the Privy Council Office, revealing mismanagement, noncompliance, conflict of interest breaches, and a toxic culture. Independent investigations found that various funds and COVID payments were improperly distributed, totaling around $120 million. The report also exposes a lack of HR processes and policies. Despite these findings, no one has faced consequences, and the implicated individuals' names were protected. The speaker calls for the suspension of SDTC, a new board and management team, and an end to the abuse. They claim to have evidence supporting their testimony.

The speaker alleges that Mark Carney and Justin Trudeau are setting up a system where companies must buy carbon credits from companies like Brookfield if they are not "eco and green." They claim Brookfield will profit immensely from this. The speaker points to SEC filings showing Carney has 209,000 shares of Brookfield at $35 and 200,000 shares at $40, potentially netting him $6.8 million if sold. They suggest Carney's promotion of net-zero policies could greatly increase Brookfield's stock value, further enriching him. The speaker demands transparency regarding Carney's investments, questioning if he owns additional shares of Brookfield. The speaker plays audio of Carney discussing a $100 billion a year market in carbon offsets and stating that financial institutions expect to "make a lot of money off of this" transition to net zero. The speaker concludes that Carney has significant conflicts of interest and should not be Prime Minister.

The NDP Liberal government's $1 billion green fund is facing corruption allegations. The CEO and board chair resigned in disgrace, while the auditor general and ethics commissioner are investigating Liberal appointees. Whistleblowers claim that $150 million was embezzled by insiders. The opposition demands answers on where the missing millions went and who benefited. The Minister of Innovation defends the government's investment in clean technology and fighting climate change. However, the opposition criticizes the Liberals for funneling money to their friends while Canadians struggle, and questions if the RCMP will be involved in the investigations.

The speaker expresses disbelief that the Department of Energy allegedly spent $93 billion in the 76 days between President Trump's election and President Biden taking office. They clarify that the funds were disbursed as loans to entities lacking business plans or financial records. The speaker characterizes this as "distasteful" and "confidence undermining."