reSee.it - Related Video Feed

These are examples of approved and failed ballots. The Voter Privacy Act prohibits inspectors from examining ballots to verify signatures. Many of the reviewed ballots have two different patterns of the letter "S" in the signature, even though some owners' names don't contain an "S." In total, 104,820 ballots were reviewed, with 20,232 having mismatched signatures.

Georgia owes President Donald J. Trump an apology for election fraud. Evidence shows 17,852 votes were counted without ballot images, and 3,930 ballots were scanned and counted twice intentionally. The process involved randomly selecting and rescanning ballots on different days. This deliberate duplication was not an administrative error but human intervention, constituting election fraud. The speaker urges Secretary Raffensperger to investigate independently.

The speaker discusses the issue of inspecting ballots for signatures. They mention that the Voter Privacy Act prohibits inspectors from looking through a ballot to verify a signature. They also point out that many ballots have two different patterns of the letter "s" written for the signature, even though some of them don't even have an "s" in the voter's name. They state that out of the 104,820 ballots reviewed, 20,232 had mismatched signatures, which accounts for 20% of the total.

Miss Waters from California rises to object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral votes. The objection is in writing but not signed by a senator. The chair advises that the rules require a senator's signature. Miss Waters mentions gross violations of the voting rights act in Florida but acknowledges that the objection is not signed by a senator. The chair thanks Miss Waters but states that the point of order may not be received.

A woman is seen delivering a stack of ballots. Someone in a car hands her another ballot to add to the stack. The woman then returns to her car with the stack of ballots and allegedly realizes they are not signed. The video purportedly shows her signing each ballot individually inside the vehicle, placing them on the dashboard one by one. The footage is described as clear, with a close-up showing the woman at the Dropbox.

The Republican National Committee is criticizing the Democrat party for opposing verification of signatures and transparency in the vote count. They accuse Democrats of welcoming fraud and illegal voting. The RNC emphasizes the importance of protecting the American people's right to vote and ensuring an honest and accurate election process. The speaker's claims are questioned for lack of evidence to support such serious allegations. The discussion is left open for further developments.

The speaker, Jordan Conrad, questions Miss Hobbs about authorizing additional testing and the signatures on mail-in ballot updates. He accuses her of being unaware that the signatures do not match those of the voters. Miss Hobbs, as the secretary of state, oversaw elections in Maricopa County and Arizona. The conversation becomes heated, with the speaker using profanity and asking if Miss Hobbs said something disrespectful.

The speaker questions the certification of the election results, stating that the margin of victory is less than 1%. They mention testimony from the secretary of state's counsel, who sent letters to 8,000 people who voted illegally, advising them not to vote in the US senate race. This number is almost three-fourths of the margin of victory. The speaker also points out that there is a 10% margin that is not accurate. They ask how the senate and house can stand by the certification.

The chair hands the certificate of the electors for president and vice president of the state of Florida to the tellers. An objection to Florida’s votes is presented in writing, signed by a number of members of the House of Representatives, but not by a member of the Senate. A member of the Congressional Black Caucus states that he is objecting to the counting of the 25 electoral votes from Florida, thanking the president for the inquiry, and says the objection is signed on behalf of his diverse constituents and the millions of Americans disenfranchised by Florida’s inaccurate vote count. The clerk reports the objection, noting that it is signed by a member of the House and a United States senator. The objection to Ohio’s electoral votes is read, raised on the ground that the votes were not “under all of the known circumstances regularly given.” It is signed by Stephanie Tubbs Jones of Ohio and Barbara Boxer of California. Another speaker says the objection today is raised because there are irregularities across the country with regard to voting, and that Congress has an obligation to step up to the plate and correct them. A further speaker dedicates the Ohio objection to Michael Moore, the producer of the documentary Fahrenheit 9/11. A speaker notes that, first of all, no election official in Ohio has provided any explanation for the massive and widespread irregularity in the state, including machines in Mahoning County that recorded “carry” votes for Bush. There is a sense of concern about irregularities across the nation. In closing, another speaker remarks that people are dying all over the world, many from his state, in the name of bringing democracy to distant parts of the world, and asks, “Let’s fix it here, and let’s do it first thing out.”

The speaker mentions the history of elections in Fulton County, Georgia. Another speaker brings up an interesting incident during a 99% audit on signatures. They found that many ballots did not have the required red initials, indicating approval. Once separated from the outer envelope, these ballots still had to be counted. This poses a problem as it undermines the accuracy of the audit. The speaker expresses concern about the lack of proper examination for dozens of ballots on Saturday. The conversation concludes with a thank you to Miss Fisher.

We have concerns about mail-in ballots in Clark County, with reports of ballots found in trash cans and multiple ballots sent to one address. Signatures were supposed to prevent fraud, but we haven't been able to verify them. We suspect there are ineligible voters, including deceased individuals and those who have moved. A voter was turned away due to someone else casting their ballot. We're taking legal action to stop the counting of improper votes. Thank you.

Jordan Conrad from Gateway Plumbing questions Miss Hobbs about the election in Arizona, specifically mentioning secret machine testing in Maricopa County and discrepancies in mailing ballot signatures. He asks if she authorized the testing and if she is aware of the signature issues. Jordan criticizes Miss Hobbs for overseeing elections in Maricopa County and Arizona.

A woman is seen delivering a stack of unsigned ballots. A person in a car hands her a ballot to put in the ballot box. Realizing the ballots are unsigned, she signs each one individually in her car and places them on the dashboard. The video footage is clear and shows her going to the dropbox.

I believe it was Florence who said that none of us think our signatures are consistent enough over time, especially since getting our driver's licenses. While some senators have shown interest in the process, there seems to be a lack of media attention and interest from the minority party.

During the certification of the election results, Al Gore presided over the event as outgoing Vice President and President of the Senate. If a congressman wanted to object, they needed the signed support of one senator. One congressman objected, stating that the Supreme Court, not the people, decided the election. However, the objection was not signed by a senator. Another congressman from Arizona then objected, with the objection being in writing and signed by a senator. The video ends with a statement that President Trump was wrong in claiming the right to overturn the election.

The Georgia legislature is presenting a set of facts to the court asserting widespread voting irregularities in Georgia. They claim: - 2,506 felons voted illegally in Georgia. - 66,248 underage and therefore ineligible people were illegally registered to vote before their seventeenth birthday, when the law requires 17 years old. - At least 2,423 individuals voted who were not listed as registered. - 1,043 individuals cast ballots who had illegally registered to vote using a post office box. - 4,926 individuals voted in Georgia who had registered to vote after their Georgia voter registration date, thereby canceling their Georgia voter registration. - 10,315 or more individuals voted who were deceased by the time of the election. - 395 individuals voted in Georgia who had cast ballots in another state, which is illegal in both states. - 15,700 individuals voted in Georgia who had filed a national change of address with the United States Postal Service prior to 11/03/2020. - 40,279 individuals voted who had moved across county lines at least thirty days prior to election day and had failed to properly re-register to vote in their new county, also in violation of Georgia law. The petition to contest will include affidavits of more than one hundred Georgia voters sworn under penalty of perjury, attesting to and confirming multiple violations of the Georgia election code. You will hear from several of those witnesses today. They also assert there are issues of outright lies and potential fraud. The speakers contend that the actual results of legal ballots cast in the November election in compliance with the Georgia election code cannot be known ever, not by the secretary of state, not by the governor downstairs, not by the voting public, and not by this Georgia legislature.

The speaker questions Miss Hobbs about the alleged intentional failures during the election that caused disenfranchisement of Republican voters. They mention ongoing lawsuits and express concern about her decision-making on Arizona's water future. Another person brings up the issue of signature verification in the 2022 election, where employees were allegedly clicking through signatures too quickly. Miss Hobbs states that she doesn't have a comment on it as it's not under her jurisdiction. The speaker insists that she should answer election questions since a majority of Arizonans believe the election was unfair. Miss Hobbs is reminded that she is not a reporter.

The speaker claims they were prevented from adequately observing ballot procedures, and that supervisors dismissed their concerns. They allege ballots were backdated from November 4th to November 2nd, and that data was entered into computers for these mail-in ballots. According to the speaker, poll workers entered ballot information from new mail-in ballots, including dates of birth of 01/01/1900, into electronic poll books and processed those ballots for tabulation, even though the information was not previously in the electronic or paper supplement book. The speaker also claims to have emailed Republican senators and House representatives information about dead people voting, referencing a website listing 17,327 randomly checked Michigan voters over 80 who voted in the 2020 election and are listed in online obituaries. The speaker believes this is the most important election and urges legislators to fulfill their oath to defend the US and state constitutions, asserting there is massive evidence of voter fraud.

Representative Moe Brooks plans to challenge the election results on January 6th, claiming the House and Senate have the authority to reject electoral college votes from states with flawed election systems. Brooks believes that Donald Trump won if only lawful votes were counted. Brooks asserts that an honest voting system is the bedrock of a republic. He states he will object to submissions from states with flawed systems and needs a senator to join him to force a vote. He urges the American people to contact their representatives and demand they co-sponsor objections to flawed electoral college vote totals, or risk losing their vote. Brooks has not spoken with Republican leaders Kevin McCarthy or Mitch McConnell. He claims millions of illegal votes were cast, citing illegal aliens, non-citizens, and violations of article one section four of the United States constitution.

The speaker asks if the person is aware that the outer envelope of a ballot must have the date, time, and signature of the town clerk. The person admits they were not aware. The speaker then asks if the person instructed their absentee ballot moderator about this rule, to which the person responds that they went over the manual but did not specifically mention the signature requirement. The speaker shows an example of an envelope without a signature and asks if it should have been counted. The person objects, but the speaker clarifies that they were in charge of counting the ballots. The person admits they did not discuss the signature requirement with the moderator. The speaker asks if the person's office ever checked for the clerk's signature on the envelopes, to which the person says it never came up in their training.

A senior law enforcement officer witnessed unauthorized individuals inserting USBs into voting machines multiple times. Despite demands for forensic evidence collection, no action was taken. Chain of custody logs and records in Delaware County are missing, leaving 100,000-120,000 ballots in question with no remedy available. The speaker believes certifying the vote would be unconscionable. Translation: A senior law enforcement officer saw unauthorized people inserting USBs into voting machines multiple times. Despite requests for forensic evidence collection, no action was taken. Chain of custody logs and records in Delaware County are missing, leaving 100,000-120,000 ballots in question with no solution available. The speaker believes certifying the vote would be unethical.

I was surprised to learn that there was no signature verification done for the ballots. I questioned how ballots without signatures were handled, and the response was they were just sent back out. This made me uncomfortable certifying the results.

The speaker asks if the person is aware that the outer envelope of a ballot must have the date, time, and signature of the town clerk. The person admits they were not aware of this. The speaker then questions if the person instructed the absentee ballot moderator about this rule, to which the person says they did not. The speaker shows examples of envelopes with and without the clerk's signature, and asks if the one without should have been counted. The person agrees that it should not have been counted. The speaker asks if the person ever checked for the clerk's signature on envelopes, and the person says it never came up in their training.

The speaker acknowledges the chairman's hard work and thanks him. Another speaker mentions an interesting incident during the 99% audit on signatures. They explain that many signatures did not have the required red initials, indicating approval. Once the ballot is separated from the outer envelope, it must be counted regardless. This poses a problem as dozens of ballots on Saturday had not been properly reviewed. The speaker concludes by expressing concern about the audit. Miss Fisher is thanked for her input.

Four years ago, there were concerns about uncounted votes in Illinois. The senator from New York commended the senator from California for raising objections and allowing the discussion of these issues. A computing error in Franklin County awarded extra votes to George Bush, raising questions about the accuracy and integrity of the election system. These issues were not limited to Ohio, as other states also faced similar situations. The legitimacy of our elections is being challenged, which is concerning given our efforts to promote democracy worldwide. The objection raised in Ohio is just one example of the irregularities observed. The debate will continue thanks to the objection from California. The golden rule in politics is emphasized, regardless of the election outcome.