reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Megyn Kelly discusses a significant hearing in Fulton County regarding former President Donald Trump, focusing on testimony from Terrence Bradley, a friend and former lawyer of special prosecutor Nathan Wade. Bradley's testimony was marked by evasiveness and a lack of recall, raising suspicions about his credibility. He claimed not to remember key details about the romantic relationship between Wade and Fulton County DA Fanny Willis, despite having previously communicated specifics via text to defense attorney Ashley Merchant. Kelly highlights that Bradley had previously told Merchant that the affair began before Willis hired Wade, contradicting their sworn statements. The texts exchanged between Bradley and Merchant reveal that he was confident about the timeline and details of the relationship, including where they met. Despite this, on the stand, Bradley claimed he was speculating and could not recall the information he had previously provided. The judge ruled that Bradley had to testify, dismissing claims of attorney-client privilege. Kelly emphasizes that the texts serve as substantive evidence that contradicts Bradley's courtroom testimony. Phil Holloway, an attorney and guest on the show, notes that the text messages are crucial for impeachment, as they show inconsistencies in Bradley's statements. He explains that the judge can consider these prior inconsistent statements as evidence, potentially impacting the case against Willis and Wade. The discussion also touches on the implications of the Georgia State Senate's investigation into the Fulton DA's office, which has issued subpoenas for text communications related to the case. Holloway suggests that if the judge finds evidence of fraud, it could have serious consequences for Willis and her team. The conversation concludes with speculation about the motivations behind the prosecution and the potential need for an independent investigation into the conduct of those involved.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing various legal cases, including the Kansas City Chiefs fans found frozen outside a friend's house, and the trial of Michelle Traconis, the alleged affair partner of a man accused of murdering his wife. Traconis is on trial for allegedly helping dispose of the victim's belongings after the husband died by suicide. Kelly emphasizes the importance of free speech, promoting a bottled water company, Freedom 20, which supports the right to offend and express oneself. She then introduces her guests, Arthur Idala and Mark Eiglarsh, who discuss a recent incident in New York City involving migrants arrested for allegedly assaulting police officers. The guests express frustration over the leniency of the judicial system, particularly regarding bail policies that allow suspects to be released without bail. The conversation shifts to the case of Daniel Penny, who is facing charges related to a subway incident. Idala highlights the disparity in treatment between Penny and the migrants who assaulted police officers, noting the lack of accountability for the latter. The discussion touches on the broader implications of crime and bail reform in New York. Next, the hosts discuss a bizarre case involving three Kansas City Chiefs fans who died from fentanyl overdoses after visiting a friend known for making drug cocktails. Toxicology reports reveal the deceased had lethal doses of fentanyl in their systems. The conversation raises questions about the responsibility of the friend, dubbed "the chemist," who was inside the house during the incident. The dialogue transitions to the ongoing legal troubles of Fanny Willis, the Fulton County District Attorney, who is facing scrutiny over her personal relationship with a special prosecutor involved in the Trump case. The hosts speculate on whether this relationship could affect the integrity of the case and whether she should recuse herself. The show also covers the trial of Jennifer Crumbley, the mother of a school shooter, who is being charged for her alleged negligence in not recognizing her son's mental health issues and for providing him access to a firearm. The guests debate the merits of the prosecution's case against her, with differing opinions on parental responsibility in such tragic circumstances. Finally, the discussion shifts to Alec Baldwin, who has pleaded not guilty to involuntary manslaughter charges related to the shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the set of "Rust." The hosts analyze the complexities of the case, including the responsibilities of actors and crew members regarding firearm safety on set. The episode concludes with a focus on the Alec Murdoch case, where a judge denied a motion for a new trial despite juror testimony suggesting influence from a court clerk. The guests reflect on the implications of the case for the legal system in South Carolina and the importance of accountability within the profession.

Megyn Kelly opens the show celebrating the disqualification of Fulton County DA Fanny Willis from the Trump election interference case by a Georgia appeals court, marking a significant development in the ongoing legal battles against Trump. The court confirmed that the indictment against Trump and his co-defendants remains intact, raising questions about who will take over the case. Legal experts, including Ashley Merchant, who played a crucial role in Willis's disqualification, discuss the implications of the ruling, emphasizing the impropriety of Willis's relationship with a co-prosecutor, Nathan Wade, which compromised the integrity of the case. Merchant expresses her excitement over the ruling, noting that it validates their claims of impropriety and suggests that an independent prosecutor would likely dismiss the case due to lack of probable cause. The conversation highlights the potential for the case to "die on the vine" under a neutral prosecutor. The panel discusses Willis's intent to appeal to the Georgia Supreme Court, though they predict the court will not take the case, given the strength of the appellate ruling. The discussion shifts to the broader implications of the ruling for Trump and his co-defendants, with legal analysts asserting that the case is effectively over and that Willis's actions could lead to further scrutiny of her conduct. The panel reflects on the political motivations behind the prosecution, suggesting that bias against Trump influenced Willis's decisions. As the conversation continues, the hosts and guests express concern over potential disruptions from political adversaries as a new administration approaches. They also touch on the broader context of Trump's legal challenges, including ongoing cases and the implications of his presidency on these legal matters. The show concludes with a discussion on the media's portrayal of Trump and the shifting political landscape, emphasizing the resilience of Trump's support despite the legal challenges he faces. The panelists express optimism about the future, suggesting that the ruling against Willis could restore some faith in the justice system and benefit Trump politically.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing Fulton County District Attorney Fanny Willis, who quoted scripture about facing challenges in her role. The judge overseeing her potential disqualification is set to make key decisions regarding claims of attorney-client privilege, with closing arguments from both sides pending. Kelly highlights a deep dive on the case that has garnered significant attention online. A key witness, Terren Bradley, took the stand but invoked attorney-client privilege, limiting his testimony. Another witness, Robin Yeartie, claimed that Willis and Nathan Wade's affair began in 2019, contradicting their statements that it started in 2022. Yeartie's credibility was questioned, but her testimony raised doubts about the timeline of the affair. Bradley's subsequent testimony seemed to support Yeartie's claims, despite his initial reluctance to disclose information. Philip Holloway, a legal expert, joins to analyze the implications of Bradley's testimony and the potential consequences for Willis if the judge finds evidence of dishonesty. The discussion revolves around the ethical obligations of attorneys to disclose false testimony, with Holloway suggesting that Bradley's knowledge of the affair could compel him to testify truthfully. The conversation shifts to the broader implications of the case, including the potential for Willis and Wade to face disbarment if found guilty of perjury. The hosts express skepticism about the prosecution's strategy and the credibility of Willis's team, emphasizing the importance of the judge's upcoming rulings. Kelly transitions to discussing the Trump civil fraud verdict, where a judge ruled against Trump, imposing significant financial penalties. The hosts debate the implications of this ruling on Trump's business and political future, with some suggesting that it reflects a broader pattern of selective prosecution against Republicans. Charlie Kirk joins the discussion, criticizing the media's portrayal of Willis and the legal proceedings. He outlines key points regarding the alleged affair and the ethical violations involved, asserting that the case against Trump is politically motivated. Kirk emphasizes the need for accountability within the Republican Party and expresses support for Lara Trump as a potential co-chair of the RNC, highlighting her ability to connect with voters. The conversation concludes with reflections on the current political landscape, including Biden's presidency and the challenges facing the Democratic Party. The hosts discuss the potential for a shift in leadership and the impact of third-party candidates on the upcoming election.

The Megyn Kelly Show features a discussion with Kyle Warner, a professional mountain bike racer who shares his experience with adverse side effects following his second dose of the COVID vaccine. Warner describes how he initially felt fine after his first dose but began experiencing heart palpitations and other health issues after the second dose. He ended up in the emergency room multiple times, where he was diagnosed with pericarditis and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS). Warner emphasizes the lack of open discourse regarding vaccine side effects and expresses frustration with the medical community's dismissive attitude towards his symptoms. The conversation shifts to Andrew Branca, an attorney discussing the trial of former police officer Kim Potter, who fatally shot Dante Wright during a traffic stop. Branca notes that the prosecution has struggled to present a compelling case, as Potter's actions appear to be a tragic mistake rather than criminal recklessness. He highlights the testimony of other officers who supported Potter's intentions and the challenges the prosecution faces in proving criminal intent. Allie Beth Stuckey joins the show to discuss the crime wave in San Francisco, particularly in light of Mayor London Breed's recent shift in stance on law enforcement. Stuckey critiques the policies that led to increased crime rates and expresses skepticism about whether Breed's new approach will result in meaningful change. The discussion touches on broader themes of social justice and the consequences of progressive policies on public safety. The episode also addresses the controversy surrounding transgender athletes in women's sports, specifically focusing on Leah Thomas, a trans swimmer at the University of Pennsylvania. Stuckey and Kelly discuss the unfair advantages that trans women may have in competitive sports and the implications for female athletes. The show concludes with a focus on the societal impacts of pornography, as highlighted by Billie Eilish's candid remarks about her experiences with it. Eilish's comments resonate with concerns about the normalization of harmful sexual behaviors among young people. Overall, the episode covers a range of topics, including vaccine side effects, legal issues in high-profile trials, crime and law enforcement policies, gender identity in sports, and the influence of pornography on youth.

In this special edition of the Megyn Kelly Show, the focus is on the upcoming trial of Brian Colberg, accused of murdering four college students in Idaho. The trial is set to begin in 2024 and will be televised. Colberg maintains his innocence, with his defense team arguing that the prosecution's case is not strong. Key evidence includes DNA found on a knife sheath linked to Colberg's father, but the defense claims the DNA could have been planted. The prosecution also relies on cell phone pings and surveillance footage of Colberg's car near the crime scene, though these connections are not definitive. Eyewitness accounts and the lack of a murder weapon complicate the case further. The defense plans to present an alibi, stating Colberg was driving alone that night, but lacks specific witnesses. Additionally, the defense is exploring potential drug-related motives tied to the local drug scene, raising questions about other suspects. The trial's outcome remains uncertain as both sides prepare for a complex legal battle.