TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Last weekend, I was at a very expensive ski resort in the Alps, filled with wealthy Ukrainians spending lavishly. This is happening all over Europe. This money, I believe, should be ours—American taxpayer money. Furthermore, I know that a significant portion, up to half, of the arms we send to the Ukrainian military is being sold off, a lot of it ending up in the hands of drug cartels at our border. This is criminal. Our intelligence agencies are aware of this, and I believe they are profiting from it. Billions of dollars in aid are being stolen and sold to our enemies. This is unacceptable, and no one in America seems to know about it.

Nikki Haley, former UN ambassador, is accused of being corrupt due to her involvement in military contracting and undisclosed clients. She started a military contracting firm after leaving the UN and served on the board of Boeing. She received secretive speaking fees from foreign actors while running the firm. Critics compare her to Hillary Clinton, claiming she collected stock options while running for president. Despite starting with personal debt, Haley became a multimillionaire. The speaker argues that people like Haley and Joe Biden should not be trusted to make decisions about sending children to war.

The speaker claims the U.S. has given close to $5 billion to the Taliban via NGOs, and this continues. They allege this money cycles back to Washington, with a paper trail that Elon Musk has alluded to. The speaker believes USAID money goes "almost a %" right back to Democrat campaign coffers, with some Republicans also possibly benefiting. They state that Republican leadership is upset about these claims but acknowledges their truth. The speaker also questions how Joe Biden could have reviewed 8,000 pardon files, suggesting "payola" and shadiness in Washington D.C., particularly across various departments.

The president stated the Pentagon announced they would be accepting a Qatari jet to be used as Air Force One. He said it’s a great thing and that Qatar gave $5,100,000,000,000 worth of investment in addition to the jet. He then accused an NBC reporter of trying to change the subject and called him a terrible reporter who isn’t smart enough. He said Brian Roberts and the people who run NBC should be investigated for how terribly they run the network, calling the reporter a disgrace and refusing to answer any more questions from him.

I want to talk about waste, fraud, and abuse. People like President Musk and Trump are using their public offices to enrich themselves by billions of dollars. Why is there silence about looking into the actions of the president and the richest man on Earth? I will say President Musk and Trump often use their public offices to enrich themselves. I will withdraw calling Trump "grifter-in-chief." It's despicable that this committee is silencing me for bringing up that Trump is making millions of dollars.

According to the speaker, the Citizens United Supreme Court decision, roughly 15 or 16 years old, equates money with freedom of expression, allowing billionaires to spend unlimited amounts to influence elections. The speaker believes this is the Supreme Court's worst decision. As a result of the decision, Elon Musk spent $270 million to elect Trump as president. The speaker believes it's absurd for one person to have that much influence. Someone spent $1.5 billion on the Harris campaign over a couple of months. The speaker clarifies that this issue is not limited to Republicans.

$100 billion in cash was flown to Tehran on US Air Force planes without congressional knowledge. The speaker questions the lack of investigation or impeachment over this. They suggest a possible collusion between politicians of both parties. The speaker believes God is orchestrating events.

According to the speaker, Democratic colleagues are upset about a situation that is not yet a done deal. If reports are accurate, the government of Qatar is considering gifting the United States Department of Defense an American-made Boeing 747 for temporary use as Air Force One. The speaker emphasizes that this is not for the president's personal use, and he will not be using it after he leaves office. The speaker also claims that it is customary for foreign countries to give the U.S. government gifts.

Richard Pater and Norm Eisen express concern about Donald Trump's financial conflicts of interest, particularly regarding the emoluments clause of the Constitution, which prohibits public officials from receiving payments and gifts from foreign governments. Trump's hotel is soliciting foreign governments for business, which they claim would violate the Constitution. They assert that Trump has stated that the laws don't apply to him, which they dispute. They also raise concerns about potential litigation and corruption risks during a Trump administration. They urge electors to consider whether Trump can honestly take the oath of office to defend the Constitution when he may be in violation of it immediately upon being sworn in. They believe it would be unacceptable for a president to be in violation of the Constitution on their first day in office.

The speaker discusses the travel arrangements of a government official who commutes between Atlanta and Washington, D.C. The official flies on a private jet every weekend, costing the American taxpayer a significant amount of money. However, the official only pays around $200 per flight, which is the commercial equivalent of the region. The speaker also mentions that the official has a security detail and other staff who accompany him, resulting in additional expenses. The speaker suggests that this arrangement seems like corruption and questions the fairness of the situation.

Donald Trump was working to bring peace between Iran and Israel, and Israel didn’t want that at all. They tried to murder the negotiators in that round of peace talks from Hamas in Doha, and they tried to tell the world that Trump signed off on this, that Trump knew, totally false. Trump did not know. Not only did they do this, they tried to implicate Trump in it. A couple of weeks later he responded with an executive order that I’m going to read verbatim because it’s bet not one in a hundred people knows this even happened. This was in September: he signed an executive order called the Assuring the Security of the State of Qatar. The order states: The United States and the State of Qatar have been bound together by close cooperation, shared interests, and the close relationship between our armed forces. The State of Qatar has hosted The United States forces, enabled critical security operations, and stood as a steadfast ally in pursuit of peace, stability, and prosperity both in The Middle East and abroad, including as a mediator that has assisted The United States attempts to resolve significant regional and global conflicts. Listen: In recognition of this history and in light of the continuing threats to the state of Qatar posed by foreign aggression, it is the policy of The US to guarantee the security and territorial integrity of the state of Qatar against external attack. The United States shall regard any armed attack on the territory sovereignty or critical infrastructure of the state of Qatar as a threat to the peace and security of The United States. Oh, wait a second. What was the last act of foreign aggression against Qatar? What happened that exact same month? It was a bombing by Israel. So Israel bombs Qatar and Donald Trump issues an executive order saying if you do that again, reading by the language here, we’re going to war with you. Donald Trump took the side of Qatar over and above Israel and told Israel, and who knows if he’d actually do it, it’s in the executive order, If you do this again, that’s tantamount to an attack on us. That’s a security guarantee. Keep that in mind because there are a lot of Trump voters who are upset about nine eleven; the residue was still in their mouth. That part of the world did it to us. Islam did it to us. And anyone who wants to have a normal relationship with an Islamic country is probably pro Al Qaeda. I get it. I know those feelings. Had them. But here Donald Trump, the guy that you voted for taking Qatar’s side against Israel. Why is that? Because Donald Trump is a secret Islamist? No. Because Qatar is a lot better for The United States than Israel has been.

Nikki Haley is accused of being corrupt, similar to Joe Biden. She allegedly benefited financially from her public service, including through her involvement with Boeing and a pharmaceutical company. She has a pattern of doing favors for those who scratch her back. After her short stint at the UN, she and her family started a military contracting firm called Allied Defense LLC, which should disclose its clients. Haley also served on the board of Boeing and received secretive speaking fees from foreign actors while running the military contracting firm. She collected corporate stock options while running for US president and is now a multimillionaire. Haley's personal debt and connections raise concerns about her ability to fix the national debt problem.

The speaker discusses Trump's trip to Saudi Arabia, highlighting the "bromance diplomacy" and gifts like camels, Teslas, horses, dancing girls, a purple carpet, and a mobile McDonald's with a "bonesaw" Happy Meal toy. As Trump left Saudi Arabia, they played YMCA. In Qatar, he received a $400 million plane, dubbed "Ala Force One." Trump now has four planes. The speaker mentions Glenn Rogers, a serial killer from Florida, whose last words were "President Trump keep making America great." The speaker then discusses the Sean Combs trial in New York, focusing on Cassie's testimony about Combs bringing in other men to have rough sex with her, including urinating on her, while he watched. Shug Knight believes Trump will pardon Diddy.

Trump is launching a $1 trillion military budget and is already bombing countries, with $1 billion spent in two weeks bombing Yemen. Additionally, $13 billion is going to Israel. The speaker states this is not what Trump promised. Trump may try to shut down war in the region that he created with a deal mimicking the 2015 deal, and might get the support of congress. Sanctions removal is a hard task in Washington, where every department office representative senator is affected by the Israeli lobby and its dictates. However, Trump is capable of doing a lot more than other, more well-mannered, American presidents.

The speaker questions why Donald Trump would be considering pardoning a known sex trafficker, Ghislaine Maxwell, and notes that there has been no satisfactory explanation from MAGA supporters. They point out that Maxwell abused kids and that Trump has already given her a “really nice prison… like a club fed,” and is now considering pardoning her. The speaker asks, “He said it. Yeah, I'd consider why? Okay, hey, would you consider pardoning Khalid Sheikh Mohammed? I bet he would say no to that, as he should. Would you consider partnering Ghislain Maxwell, a known sex trafficker who abused kids? I have to think about it. Why? Why Mago? Why? Why would he have to think about it?” They urge that, before mentioning Biden, one must explain why Donald Trump would consider it, insisting that Biden is not president and is not the answer. The speaker asserts that Biden wasn’t the one who made a big deal about releasing the Epstein files. In contrast, they claim Trump attacked Biden for not releasing the Epstein files, whereas Biden assumed DOJ was doing their job and Trump didn’t. The speaker maintains that Trump can release the Epstein files right now. They further state that if someone brings up Biden in response, the only acceptable way to do so without appearing to defend a sex trafficker would be to first answer the question: why would Donald Trump even consider it? The speaker ends by saying they look forward to reading the response.

The speaker questions the attorney general about pardons for January 6th offenders and asks if she advised the president on this. The attorney general refuses to discuss conversations with the president. The speaker accuses the administration of incompetence, corruption, and cruelty, focusing on corruption. She asks if the attorney general was ever registered as an agent of a foreign principal under the Foreign Agents Registration Act. The attorney general acknowledges representing Qatar for anti-human trafficking efforts related to the World Cup. The speaker accuses her of being a registered lobbyist for Qatar and not disclosing this during her Senate confirmation. The attorney general claims it was discussed in detail. The speaker asks if the attorney general advised that President Trump could accept a $400 million airplane from Qatar. The attorney general refuses to discuss advice given to the president. The speaker asks if she recused herself from that issue, and the attorney general questions the speaker's claim that the president wanted the jet because it was "pretty."

The speaker discusses the issue of foreign policy for personal profit, specifically focusing on the Biden family's involvement. They highlight three types of scandals associated with this: conflict of interest, insider trading, and government resources for personal investment. The speaker explains how personal profit can influence foreign policy decisions, using examples from Ukraine, China/Iran, and Mexico. They argue that when individuals personally benefit from these policies, it creates a conflict of interest and raises concerns about the integrity of decision-making. The speaker also emphasizes the insider trading aspect, where family members profit from government policies they are involved in shaping. Lastly, they criticize the use of government resources to support private investments, which they view as a misuse of taxpayer money.

If the House is taken, investigations into Trump's family and crypto acquisitions are guaranteed. As a member of the oversight committee, there will be investigations into whether the president violated the emoluments clause, such as getting a $400,000,000 plane. There will also be investigations into all of their business deals. They went after Hunter for sitting on a board, but the amount of money the Trumps are raking in is much greater, whether it's the next golf resort in Qatar, leveling Gaza for beachfront property, or the crypto scam. There is no shortage of things to dig into and determine whether there have been violations of the law.