reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 1 claims that no vaccines, including the COVID vaccine, have been properly tested. They assert that no childhood vaccine has undergone a placebo-controlled clinical trial of sufficient duration and power to assess its safety before being injected into millions of children in America. Speaker 1 states this is not just their opinion, but can be verified by anyone who examines the FDA website, specifically the package inserts and underlying clinical trial documents.

The speaker, a former pharmaceutical sales rep, shares their disillusionment with the industry after discovering corruption and falsified safety data. They recount their experience with vaccines and their concerns about the lack of rigorous safety studies and the toxic additives, such as aluminum, in childhood vaccines. The speaker highlights the high rates of illness in American children compared to other developed countries and attributes it to the profit-driven nature of the pharmaceutical industry. They discuss the influence of pharmaceutical companies on the media and the lack of liability for vaccine manufacturers. The speaker emphasizes the need for more research and information before mandating vaccines, citing the potential risks involved.

The speaker highlights several concerns regarding vaccines. They mention the lack of education on vaccines, including their contents, safety records, and informed consent. They also discuss conflicts of interest in payments to providers for completing vaccine schedules, as well as patients being dismissed from practices for vaccine safety concerns. The speaker expresses frustration with employers forcing employees to receive the flu vaccine and the lack of informed consent. They question the transparency of vaccine complications and the presence of adjuvants in placebo studies. The speaker also raises concerns about the increasing rates of autism spectrum disorder and other chronic diseases. They emphasize the need for unbiased research on vaccine safety and efficacy. The speaker announces the opening of their new medical practice to continue fighting for patient rights and uncovering the truth about vaccines.

Speaker 0 asserts that there is no safe vaccine on the childhood schedule and labels themselves an anti-vaxxer because no vaccine has been properly tested for safety. They state that, in the book Vax Facts, you are more likely to die from the vaccine than from the disease for which there is a vaccine, and that this is true for every single vaccine on the childhood schedule. They acknowledge that death from the vaccine is still a death and “super rare,” but claim you are much more likely to die from the vaccine. They ask which do you want: a greater chance of dying from the vaccine or a lesser chance of dying from the disease, noting that for many of these diseases, the risk is zero.

The speaker took his five-month-old daughter to the doctor for a wellness visit and vaccinations, but he is not comfortable with her getting six vaccines at once, including one with three vaccines in it. He knows people whose babies were healthy before vaccinations but now have permanent disabilities. He wanted to delay or space out the vaccines, but the doctors refused and are no longer willing to see his baby, which has happened with a previous doctor as well. He questions the necessity of vaccines like polio and hepatitis for his daughter. He believes doctors are incentivized by insurance companies to administer vaccines and are prioritizing vaccinations over his daughter's well-being. He asks Donald Trump to investigate vaccination policies and change the requirement that doctors have regarding vaccinations.

Speaker 1 claims that no vaccines, including the COVID vaccine, have been properly tested. They assert that no childhood vaccine has undergone a placebo-controlled clinical trial of sufficient duration and power to assess its safety before being injected into millions of children in America. Speaker 1 states this is not just their opinion, but can be verified by anyone who examines the FDA website, specifically the package inserts and underlying clinical trial documents.

The discussion centers on the credibility of vaccine safety claims made by various health organizations and the FDA. One speaker argues that vaccines undergo rigorous testing, while the other contends that no vaccine has ever completed a long-term placebo-controlled trial before being licensed. They express distrust in the FDA, citing past issues with drugs like Vioxx and opioids, suggesting that the FDA misled doctors and the public about their safety. The speaker believes that pharmaceutical companies influence these agencies, leading to misinformation about vaccine safety. The goal is to address and rectify this perceived corruption.

The speaker expresses concerns about vaccine safety and refers to a letter signed by 350 organizations supporting vaccine safety. Another speaker questions the credibility of these claims, citing the $3.3 billion paid out by the HHS to Americans injured by vaccines. They argue against the idea of sacrificing some children's health to save others and mention that more children have died from the measles vaccine than from measles itself. The first speaker acknowledges that there can be side effects but suggests striving for even safer vaccines and proposes the idea of a Vaccine Safety Commission. They question who would oppose safer vaccines and the need for additional oversight.

The speaker discusses the issue of liability protection for vaccine manufacturers and the lack of safety testing for vaccines. They explain that in 1986, liability was taken away from manufacturers, leading to an increase in the number of vaccines given to children. They argue that vaccines should be tested for safety like any other pharmaceutical product, but this is not happening due to the lack of liability. The speaker also addresses the claim that vaccines do not cause injury, particularly autism, and highlights the lack of studies supporting this claim. They conclude by discussing the use of aborted fetal tissue in vaccine development and the objections raised by religious groups.

The speaker questions the independence of regulatory agencies like the TGA, suggesting that they may be influenced by pharmaceutical companies that fund them. They criticize the quick adoption of COVID vaccines and the authorization for their use in young Australians, even before approval in the US and Europe. They argue that a Royal Commission is needed to investigate these issues and hold those responsible accountable. The speaker also mentions the Pfizer trials, claiming that there were more deaths in the vaccinated group than in the placebo group. They highlight the large amount of money spent on vaccines and the lack of transparency regarding contracts and terms. They believe that mandating vaccines violates international human rights.

The speaker expresses concerns about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly regarding the presence of DNA and contamination in the shots. They argue that the vaccines have caused more deaths in a few months than all other vaccines combined in the past 30 years. The speaker also discusses the potential risks of gene therapy and the presence of SV40 sequences and antibiotic-resistant genes in the shots. They believe that the contamination and intentional inclusion of certain sequences raise concerns about the vaccines' safety. The speaker calls for the recall of the vaccines, especially for children, and questions the transparency of the FDA and CDC in handling the data. They suggest using alternative treatments like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.

The speaker challenges someone to debate vaccines, clarifying that they are not anti-vaccine but believe in safety testing. They criticize the lack of accountability for vaccine manufacturers and the exemption from safety testing. They argue that none of the 72 mandated vaccines have been tested against a placebo, making it uncertain if the benefits outweigh the risks. The Institute of Medicine has criticized the CDC for not conducting safety testing. The speaker highlights the increase in chronic diseases like autism and food allergies and questions the source if not vaccines. They conclude by urging people to look at vaccine inserts for information on epidemic diseases in children.

The speaker claims that no childhood vaccine has ever undergone a safety trial using a double-blind, placebo-based study. They assert that this type of study, involving a saline injection as a placebo, is the only way to determine the safety of a pharmaceutical product. Furthermore, the speaker states that there has never been a study comparing the health outcomes of children who receive the full schedule of 72 (or potentially up to 90) vaccines to those who receive none. Because of the lack of safety studies and comparative data, the speaker chooses not to inject themselves or their children with vaccines. They want evidence that vaccines are safe and make people healthier.

The speaker highlights several concerns regarding vaccines. They mention the lack of education on vaccines, including their contents, safety records, and informed consent. They also discuss conflicts of interest in payments to providers for completing vaccine schedules, as well as patients being dismissed from practices for vaccine safety concerns. The speaker expresses frustration with employers forcing flu vaccines on employees and the lack of informed consent. They question the use of adjuvants in vaccine studies and the increase in autism spectrum disorder cases. The speaker emphasizes the need for transparency and understanding the potential link between vaccines and various chronic diseases. They announce the opening of a new medical practice focused on patient care and education.

The speaker states the vaccine recommendation panel has been under attack for 20 years. A 2002 congressional investigation allegedly found 97% of panel members had conflicts of interest with the pharmaceutical industry. One instance cited four out of five members working for a company when they approved its vaccine, and one voting member held a patent on that vaccine, later sold for $186 million. The speaker says the goal is to ensure the panel consists of individuals without conflicts of interest who are not profiting from their votes. The speaker claims that since the panel's inception in 1986, the vaccine schedule has expanded from 11 doses of five vaccines to 69 to 92 doses of 19 vaccines, none of which have been tested for safety. The speaker asserts this is malpractice and aims to ensure all vaccines are tested for safety so physicians and patients understand the risk profile and benefits of each vaccine.

The speaker questions the safety and effectiveness of vaccines, particularly in relation to autism. They criticize the lack of long-term, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies on vaccines and highlight the conflict of interest between vaccine manufacturers and regulatory bodies. The speaker also discusses the high number of lawsuits against pharmaceutical companies and the exorbitant markups on popular drugs. They argue that the current scientific evidence does not support the trust placed in vaccines and advocate for freedom of choice in healthcare decisions. The speaker claims to have a comprehensive review of the safety and efficacy of flu vaccines and mentions dissenting opinions on the connection between vaccines and autism.

In January 2022, a colleague alerted Speaker 0 that there had been a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year, which sparked curiosity. Speaker 1 states that “Their own government told us a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies.” Speaker 2 says she has “lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuinely for the best interests of Canadians.” Speaker 3 alleges that doctors “made extra money to push vaccines” and were given a billing code to do it, and that she has “pulled all the billing codes.” Speaker 4 asserts that “They've purchased the vaccine that hasn't been approved,” distributed it to the provinces so that once it’s approved, they can “start jabbing ourselves with it” and “start jabbing pregnant mothers with it.” Speaker 3 questions the necessity of vaccinations: “Why did we have to get these vaccinations? Like, why was this something that we had to do? You go to the hospital, you expect to have a baby, and you expect to go home, and then you don't.” Speaker 0 speculates on criminal negligence, saying, “I would suspect that there was criminal negligence on part of the government and the public health officials.” Speaker 3 notes that it is “highly recommended that pregnant women get their vaccine as soon as possible.” Speaker 0 contends that a narrative was pushed to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2 claims wiretapping, harassment, charging, and barring expert witnesses: “They had wiretapped her phone. They had harassed her. They had charged her. They didn't allow any expert witnesses to testify.” Speaker 1 accuses police of trying to cover up Canadian babies’ deaths “to the point of stopping detective Helen Greaves from testifying about it.” Speaker 4 observes that “The dominant individuals keep the subordinates in their place by constant aggression.” Speaker 5 discusses vaccination choice versus public risk, remarking, “If you don't wanna get vaccinated, that's your choice. But don't think you can get on a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk,” and claims CBC initially “started off with CBC running a story to implicate her and to paint her with a brush that looks uncomplimentary to the public.” Speaker 6 claims Canada must shift its understanding of what the is, describing it as “a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada.” Speaker 4 calls this “the most significant matter affecting our children today from a health perspective,” noting that authorities are “not investigating.” Speaker 2 concludes that everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, and health agencies, “how they work together, how they censored information. It all ties together to this one case, and that's what makes it so dangerous.”

The speaker states they searched for years for a pre-licensing safety trial of the 72 vaccine doses effectively mandated for American children. They claim that every other medication requires a safety trial comparing health outcomes in a placebo group versus a vaccine group before FDA licensing. The speaker assumed this was also done for vaccines. They state they found out that vaccines were exempt from this requirement.

Speaker decries the use of vaccines and mandates, questioning why it was done. They claim, "these vaccines were not vaccines" and that "the messenger RNA vaccines of Pfizer and Moderna" caused "unbelievable problems and damage to people," and were "pushed into this" by Pfizer and Moderna. They state, "These were not vaccines. These were horrible gene therapies that could actually integrate into your genome," linking to a rise in "turbo cancers." They urge others to "stand up to trial, defend themselves, and go to court" and call it "Nuremberg trial stuff," alleging "incompetence" and "negligence," that "they were never ever effective" and that there was "no evidence that they were effective whatsoever" and "they were never ever safe."

If regulatory agencies continue to rush products to market without long-term safety trials, the planet is in danger. The speaker questions what would happen if a vaccine wipes out fertility. They state that no childhood vaccines on the schedule have gone through randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. The speaker finds it alarming that Dr. Martin Macri's statement that no future vaccine will be licensed without a proper randomized controlled placebo trial is shocking to some. They accuse mainstream media of spreading misinformation by denying the absence of placebo trials, then admitting it to avoid delaying vaccine advancement. The speaker asserts the pharmaceutical industry has lied about drugs like Fenben and Vioxx and is now making vaccines. They call for accountability from the industry and the media, warning of grave danger if this does not happen. They disapprove of five-day safety trials with no placebo, especially for products given to healthy children.

The speaker questions the safety and effectiveness of COVID vaccines, highlighting the lack of proper testing and potential side effects like myocarditis. They call for a thorough investigation into the misinformation surrounding vaccines and the unnecessary vaccination of children. The speaker criticizes the government's fear-mongering tactics and calls for a public inquiry.

Speaker 1 states that no vaccines, including the COVID vaccine, have been properly tested. They claim that no childhood vaccine has undergone a placebo-controlled clinical trial of sufficient duration and power to assess its safety before being injected into millions of children in America. Speaker 1 asserts this is not an opinion, but can be verified by anyone reviewing package inserts and clinical trial documents on the FDA website.

The speaker took his five-month-old daughter to the doctor for a wellness visit and vaccinations, but he is not comfortable with giving his daughter six vaccines at once, especially since one of them contains three vaccines. He knows people whose babies were healthy and then had adverse reactions to vaccines, resulting in disabilities. He wanted to delay or space out the vaccinations, but the doctors refused. This is the second doctor who won't see his baby due to his refusal to get the second round of vaccinations. He questions the necessity of polio and hepatitis vaccines for his daughter. He believes it's insane that doctors would stop seeing his child over vaccinations and thinks this policy needs to change. He asks Donald Trump to investigate vaccinations, claiming doctors are incentivized by insurance companies to administer them and are more concerned with vaccinations than his daughter's well-being.

The speaker is questioned about his stance on childhood vaccines, with many scientific and medical organizations disagreeing with him. The audience asks how they can help him align with science. The speaker clarifies that he is not anti-vaccine, but believes vaccines should undergo safety testing like other medicines. He criticizes the lack of prelicensing placebo-controlled trials for vaccines and cites examples of potential risks and lack of long-term studies. The other speaker argues that there is evidence of vaccines preventing diseases and highlights the importance of distinguishing between association and causation. The speaker emphasizes the need for good science and questions the trustworthiness of pharmaceutical companies. The conversation ends with a discussion about the speaker's family not supporting his views on vaccines.