TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims Victoria Police, Avalon Airport, Channel Seven, and Channel Nine incited fear into the public, a Commonwealth offense, regarding an incident involving a mannequin. The speaker alleges discrepancies between the mannequin and a person put in a van, pointing to differences in clothing and body shape. The speaker highlights that the Avalon Airport CEO is named Ari Sus, a "proud Zionist." There is a suppression order on the identity of someone involved. The speaker asks why the police, media, and the CEO are allegedly working to incite fear. The speaker seeks information about "Barry" from Shepparton, who is said to be the "savior" in the situation, and wants to contact a young man named Daniel who witnessed the event, believing Daniel knows what he saw was fake. The speaker urges viewers to investigate and hold those involved accountable for committing a Commonwealth offense.

"Alexander DeVonte Dickey, who was arrested 39 goddamn times, 25 felonies, was on the street." "He should have been in jail for over a hundred and forty years for all the crimes he committed." "A little over six hundred days in ten years." "My daughter Logan Federico, not Irina." "She was executed while on her knees begging for her life." "My daughter wanted to be a teacher." "Not one word from Byron Gibson in South Carolina." "Four months, no communication." "Logan's deserves to be heard." "We will fight until my last breath for my daughter." "39 crimes in ten years. 25 felonies." "Can anybody there here explain to me, well, how possibly he could be on the street? Possibly be on the street." "That queer criminal, an hour later, went on a spending spree with her debit card." "They knew exactly where to go get him." "Thank you for your time."

A journalist filming a protest in Melbourne was attacked and robbed in front of police. Despite showing the police evidence, they did not take action. The journalist believes the police failed to uphold the law and protect independent journalists. He emphasizes the importance of holding the police accountable and urges viewers to share his story. The journalist expresses disappointment in the lack of support for independent journalists compared to mainstream media. He encourages viewers to visit followavi.com for updates.

I'm in Baytown, Texas, and this officer is checking my trailer. He just told me what I need to know about protecting my property here in Texas. According to the police here, you should carry a gun. If anyone tries to steal from your truck or trailer, you're within your rights to shoot them. In Texas, your truck is considered your home, and you're allowed to protect it and your belongings. If someone presents themselves as a threat, you can shoot them. Wish I had my gun with me right now.

Speaker 0: When I was actually walking out here, somebody sent me a photo of a CNN headline about what happened in Minneapolis. And this is the headline. I'm just gonna read it. Outrage after ICE officer kills US citizen in Minneapolis. Well, that's one way to put it, and that is the way that many people in the corporate media have put this attack over the last twenty four hours. And I say attack very, very intentionally because this was an attack on federal law enforcement. This was an attack on law and order. This was an attack on the American people. The way that the media by and large has reported this story has been an absolute disgrace and it puts our law enforcement officers at risk every single day. What that headline leaves out is the fact that that very off ICE officer nearly had his life ended, dragged by a car six months ago, thirty three stitches in his legs. So you think maybe he's a little bit sensitive about somebody ramming him with an automobile? What that headline leaves out is that that woman was there to interfere with a legitimate law enforcement operation in The United States Of America. What that headline leaves out is that that woman has is part of a broader left wing network to attack, to docks, to assault, and to make it impossible for our ICE officers to do their job. If the media wants to tell the truth, they ought to tell the truth that a group of left wing radicals have been working tirelessly, sometimes using domestic terror techniques to try to make it impossible for the president of The United States to do what the American people elected him to do, which is enforce our immigration laws. The president stands with ICE. I stand with ICE. We stand with all of our law enforcement officers. And part of that is recognizing that you people in the media, not everybody in this room, but many people in this room have been lying about this attack. She was trying to ram this guy with his with her car. He shot back. He defended himself. He's already been seriously wounded in law enforcement operations before, and everybody who's been repeating the lie that this is some innocent woman who was out for a drive in Minneapolis when a law enforcement officer shot at her, you should be ashamed of yourselves. Every single one of you. Questions? Thank you, mister Vice

A creator states they went to the police station because a prominent creator incited mob violence against them, their property, and family due to differing views on pesticide use. The speaker claims their phone and social media accounts were flooded, and they received death threats, which have been reported to the police. The speaker alleges the other creator is targeting them for posting about not using pesticides like glyphosate on their Facebook page. They claim the creator wants the posts removed and has threatened to continue doxxing them and ruining their life and business if they don't comply. The speaker says the creator commented on their appearance in a video. They state they are now working with the police and attorneys and that people are sending them screenshots and emails expressing fear for their safety due to the mob violence allegedly encouraged in the creator's Facebook group.

I’m doing my show like normal, and I’m reaching the end of the show when I see an alert from my Ring doorbell: somebody’s at the front door. I’m live, reading super chats and live chat messages, and I see that this guy has a loaded gun. He’s got a motorcycle helmet and a backpack, a gun drawn, and he’s knocking on the door yelling. I didn’t want to tip him off that I knew he was there, so I kept the show going for about a minute, then wrapped it up quickly. My producer runs in and I ask, who is that? What’s going on? He says, I called the cops. They’re here. The guy’s gone. Then I start getting changed out of my suit, and I hear gunshots go off outside. I jumped to the ground, not knowing what was happening. I step outside after the dust settles and there are about 10 cop cars up and down the street, the whole block locked down, the alley shut down. They tell me to get back inside. We’re not allowed to leave until the morning. That’s how late they were there. At the end of the night, after the cops left, I went out in the very early morning. Did anyone come and explain anything to you? No. Nobody said anything. It’s ridiculous. In the morning, I asked the guy what happened, and he told me the story. It turns out the shooter is a 23-year-old white man, a “white nerd,” short guy, who was at the University of Illinois in Urbana-Champaign, about two hours south of where I live. He killed three people earlier in the day: his roommate, killed the roommate’s sister, and killed the roommate’s mother. He then got in his car and drove directly to my house, parked outside, got out a .22 pistol and an automatic crossbow (a weird choice), and knocked on my door. He went around the house, tried the back door, tried the front door. The cops pulled up, he took off running through the gangway, hopped the fence, and ran into the neighbor’s house. I guess he went into the neighbor’s basement because the door was unlocked. He was hiding from the police. He shot two of the neighbor’s dogs, which is devastating. He ran back outside, and the cops spotted him. He shot at the cops. The cops shot him in the face, and he died on the spot. What was his motive? They never told me. To this day, I have no idea. There’s no explanation. There was no contact after the incident. The Illinois State Police came by about a week later to retrieve the Ring camera footage of the whole incident, and I downloaded that onto a thumb drive. That’s it. I never heard from the cops, never heard from the government. Not at all. A guy comes to murder you, kills three others and two dogs, and no one bothers to tell you anything? It’s ridiculous.

A speaker describes a situation in which police officers were hiding behind a car. The speaker says, “I tried to grab one of their guns. They grabbed me and says, no. I'm trying to grab for his gun.” The speaker asserts that these police officers know who he is and expresses a wish that they are hearing this. He accuses the officers by saying, “You are weak. You could have saved so many more people's lives.” He claims the officers were simply standing there, listening and watching the events unfold, and that they were holding him back. He questions where the other officers were, asking, “Not there. Nobody was there. Everyone, the public, helped. Nobody else.” The speaker recounts that his three-year-old child was saved by a pregnant woman who saw the child crying and screaming, “mommy, daddy.” He emphasizes that “We were there.” He questions the response time of the police, asking, “do you know how long did it take for police to come? How long did it take?” He describes the crowd’s reaction as “No. Everyone was too scared.” Across these statements, the speaker juxtaposes a perceived inaction by police with the immediate aid provided by bystanders, including a pregnant woman who intervened to protect the speaker’s child. The speaker emphasizes personal danger in attempting to disarm or confront the authorities and highlights a sense that authorities did not respond promptly or effectively, contrasting it with public intervention and rescue efforts.

A speaker confronts police, calling their actions 'There’s absolutely no nobility in what you're doing. You should be fucking ashamed of yourselves. It's called fascism. It's called fucking fascism.' He asks, 'Did he commit a crime? Is he free to go? Is he being charged with anything?' and, 'Why was he pulled over? What are the charges?' He accuses profiling: 'Are you just pulling over all the brown people who drive by because you arrested another man for what? Was he charged with anything?' He demands accountability: 'What’s your name? Okay. Why don’t you show your fucking faces, you coward?' He notes unmarked cars: 'Unmarked cars. No faces.' 'Yeah. Just says police. Police is awfully generic. So you have a badge number?' The encounter ends with insults: 'Yeah. You'll fuck yourself. You're not welcome here. Get the fuck out of our neighborhood. Jesus Christ.'

There's been companies that have been threatened, and "to cover up information that could prevent current threats to companies or specific people that are involved with." "If I feel threatened, I can tape over my license plate." Being escorted by police staff, they imply that "as long as they're with you, you can do whatever you want." "Let's play by your own rules. Beat fucking veterans on the street in in, Ottawa and shit like that." They claim "Tax dollars at work, they're they're not serving and protecting people anymore. No. They're serving their selves." They mention a Fairmont Hotel plan to "suppress the people." They say "No. They haven't found the kid yet. No. They're not even looking for that lost kid." They compare drones, "You got drones flying around here, but no drones. How many drones flying for the kid? Five year old kid." "And they got this for a bunch of ostriches. Right? Crush a family's Ostriches. Family farm." "This is what bunch of us went to Afghanistan for."

I went on TV to talk about grooming gangs in Telford, and police suddenly showed up at my door, claiming it was their duty to follow up. They had done nothing about the abuse for decades but decided to intimidate me after my interview. They said they were trying to make a difference, but it seemed like they were targeting a victim instead of the perpetrators. It's pathetic that criticizing them on TV drove them into action. I have no idea who ordered this "raid."

My husband was murdered during a farm attack in South Africa. He was shot six times, the final shot to the head, in front of me and our six-year-old daughter. Five days later, I gave birth to our son. These attacks are frequent, happening almost daily to innocent people. Our story is one of thousands. The South African president claims these murders don't exist, but they do. We've lost everything, including our sense of safety and security. The blood of my loved one still stains our home. We ask for your help in raising awareness of these farm murders and the South African government's denial of this ongoing tragedy. Please help us.

Okay, here we go. An officer just assaulted that young man. I'm pretty sure of it. This is actually happening at CPAC. This is how they're treating J6ers. It's unbelievable. They just threw a bunch out again. Here they are. Look, there's Koi. Look here. Here's Jake. Here's Koi. I just got this all worked out for them to be here, and they assaulted this young man in the process. I got it on video. I have it.

Who are you, people of policing? Are you enforcing tyranny? No, you're not. You've broken into this property and are making an arrest without a warrant. Where is the warrant? It doesn’t exist. What are the charges? Why are you taking money? I just want to know your name.

I was created in the image of god, and I want to talk about Gavin Newsom's 11% tax on guns and ammo in California. It's a violation of our rights. The law says we can have guns in our trucks, but only if they're in a case. Gavin Newsom is a traitor, and our government is allowing chemical warfare from China and aiding Mexican drug cartels. They're killing Americans and the border patrol does nothing. There's also a lot of child trafficking happening. Governor Greg Abbott, shame on you. We believe in law and order and self-defense.

In January 2022, a colleague alerted Speaker 0 that there had been a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year, which sparked curiosity. Speaker 1 states that “Their own government told us a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies.” Speaker 2 says she has “lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuinely for the best interests of Canadians.” Speaker 3 alleges that doctors “made extra money to push vaccines” and were given a billing code to do it, and that she has “pulled all the billing codes.” Speaker 4 asserts that “They've purchased the vaccine that hasn't been approved,” distributed it to the provinces so that once it’s approved, they can “start jabbing ourselves with it” and “start jabbing pregnant mothers with it.” Speaker 3 questions the necessity of vaccinations: “Why did we have to get these vaccinations? Like, why was this something that we had to do? You go to the hospital, you expect to have a baby, and you expect to go home, and then you don't.” Speaker 0 speculates on criminal negligence, saying, “I would suspect that there was criminal negligence on part of the government and the public health officials.” Speaker 3 notes that it is “highly recommended that pregnant women get their vaccine as soon as possible.” Speaker 0 contends that a narrative was pushed to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2 claims wiretapping, harassment, charging, and barring expert witnesses: “They had wiretapped her phone. They had harassed her. They had charged her. They didn't allow any expert witnesses to testify.” Speaker 1 accuses police of trying to cover up Canadian babies’ deaths “to the point of stopping detective Helen Greaves from testifying about it.” Speaker 4 observes that “The dominant individuals keep the subordinates in their place by constant aggression.” Speaker 5 discusses vaccination choice versus public risk, remarking, “If you don't wanna get vaccinated, that's your choice. But don't think you can get on a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk,” and claims CBC initially “started off with CBC running a story to implicate her and to paint her with a brush that looks uncomplimentary to the public.” Speaker 6 claims Canada must shift its understanding of what the is, describing it as “a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada.” Speaker 4 calls this “the most significant matter affecting our children today from a health perspective,” noting that authorities are “not investigating.” Speaker 2 concludes that everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, and health agencies, “how they work together, how they censored information. It all ties together to this one case, and that's what makes it so dangerous.”

The speaker discusses the importance of freedoms in New Zealand, referencing Germany's history. They ask for their name to be stated, question the law being broken, and request a photo be deleted.

"Police have now entered into the crowd." "We're not moving till something happens about this country." "Here's the man who was hit." "He's been cleaned up a little bit." "This guy was knocked out by the police." "It looks like he has a broken nose, blood gushing down his face, and now he's back." "He stood up." "He's just lying to you." "I'm not doing anything. I'm standing here." "I've seen what happened to this poor guy." "Don't do it again, mate. Honestly, don't do it again." "I'm a public citizen and a public fairway." "I'm a public citizen on a public highway." "Arrest me then." "Arrest me then." "You're gonna fuck the game on you."

Speaker 0 questions Nicole about online posts to the Prime Minister of Canada, asking if she has anything to say about that. Speaker 1 asks for specifics: what post, what she specifically said, and whether there is a screenshot. Speaker 0 cites that she online said something specific and asks for clarification. Speaker 1 replies that she said, "he's a Zionist scumbag, and he's not my prime minister," adding that she believes she is not spoken to properly and questions whether she looks like a threat. Speaker 0 explains that they came to talk because those threats were made. Speaker 1 pushes back, saying that the officers should be busy addressing real crime rather than harassing her over things she says online, and questions whether she seriously looks like a threat. Speaker 0 acknowledges and continues. Speaker 1 accuses the officers of wasting tax dollars and asserts that they should not be harassing her for what she says online because she dislikes the prime minister. Speaker 0 states Nicole should be aware that if such behavior continues, there will be consequences, implying potential arrest for threats. Speaker 1 asks what kind of threats they are referring to and demands to see what she said, noting that she still has not been shown. Speaker 0 attempts to explain what she said and what constitutes threats, warning that if those threats continue, she could be arrested and charged. Speaker 1 complains about being interrupted, asking to show what she said, and then launches into a hostile remark, calling the situation Communist Canada and asking how the officers can take pride in their work. Speaker 0 reiterates that she may have her opinion, but she insists she cannot say what she says. Speaker 1 refuses to discuss further, telling them not to touch her door. Speaker 0 says a report will be filed, stating that the search behavior continues, and mentions Trump in a dismissive way ("the Trump blah blah blah blah blah"). Speaker 1 asserts she will say whatever she wants about the prime minister and that they cannot control her speech, calling it just words. Speaker 0 responds that they are asking for non-threatening language. Speaker 1 concludes by stating they will continue to speak freely and that the conversation is over, wishing them a nice day and goodbye.

Excuse my language. The speaker describes overtime, free meals, camaraderie in hotel rooms, and "shooting the shit, talking about this, that, and the next thing" while you terrorize a family, and calls that "the RCMP." He asserts, "That's the RCMP." He continues, "Sometimes you have to sometimes you have to stand for something. You have to stand for what's right, and you aren't." The remarks frame a contrast between alleged misconduct and a call to stand for what is right. He ends with, "Now Katie's telling me Katie Roberts, my daughter, told me to hold my camera still." These are his stated accusations.

This evening, while we were out canvassing in East Wall, approximately twenty minutes ago, a guy arrived at my office banging down the door, threatening a young nephew, threatening to kill me. He'd been followed here. He'd been stopped earlier by Gardy, where he was and he said he was on his way to kill me. They didn't know he was serious. So they followed him and he had arrived here intending to attack me or kill me. Thankfully, the guardian responded immediately and now a man is in custody. These are the threats that we face in this country for standing up for our people. This is the beginning. You have a chance to change it on June 7 by voting nationalist across the country.

White South African farmers are being hunted from their land by black gangs. These gangs attack white farmers at night. The attacks involve torture, not just burglary. The number of white farmers being killed is incredible. South Africans have expropriation without compensation, meaning the government is taking land. The speaker went and slept on the farms to feel the fear. White people are denied treatment in hospitals in South Africa. It's an extreme situation that no one will talk about.

Speaker 0: Well, they already have come. Yeah. We don't like it. Yeah. Because they're trying to take our land. Speaker 1: Right. Oh. Speaker 2: You're under arrest. Speaker 1: I have the right to conduct a systems arrest, Speaker 2: and Speaker 1: he is under arrest. I'm detaining him under my police powers. Speaker 2: He's not Speaker 1: going anywhere. He can sit here until the police arrives. He's biting me. He's biting me. This is the left guys who currently just been assaulted for having to base with people. Okay? We've just been insulted by a number of people. Come over, flip the table, smash some camera equipment. I grabbed one, the man who did it, put him under a citizen's arrest, asked him please to be called. University staff have come in, assaulted me even though I clearly indicated he's under a citizen's arrest. I had him there. I said, call the police, call the police, call the police. So I requested that you lot were called. Yeah. And the university staff have come in and assaulted me and helped him get away. Britain needs mass deportations. This is my organization. Manners. We've been talking with you. Speaker 2: Have no Speaker 1: rush, Connor. Speaker 2: Woah. Woah. Woah. Woah. How? How? For what? Help. Help. Get the fuck off of this. Criminals. Speaker 1: We are young or little. I have done no crime. I've been here engaging in a public, peaceful debate, and this is how the police act. This is not acceptable in England. This is meant to be some sort of democracy. We are meant to have free fish in this country, and my ancestors went through two world wars. But there's something I can't breathe. I can't breathe. You are criminals. You're violent two d criminals. The minute you knew what was on that banner, you decided let's go

Speaker 0 states: "You're under arrest for your breach of CSO. Can you come inside with us, please? We can do it right here." They ask, "Do you drop it? Sounds good." The conversation then shifts to the reason for the arrest: "Are you aware of that? I am not aware of that." The arrestee or another speaker questions the justification, asking, "You know why you're arresting this man for? He refused to apologize for his religious beliefs." A subsequent accusation is made: "So you have become a modern day Nazis right now doing the beatings." The location and context are referenced: "This is Calgary, Alberta, Canada, twenty first century right now."

I am Rob Stockey, a retired Ottawa Police sergeant at the Helen Grewe trial. Police are restricting public access, contradicting policing principles. Big pharma influence on politicians leads to police control. Get politically involved for change with the new blue party in Ontario.