reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The discussion revolves around the narrative creation surrounding political figures, particularly Trump. There’s an acknowledgment of a previous focus on getting Trump out of office, which was not openly stated. The conversation shifts to future plans, specifically addressing climate change awareness, suggesting that fear will be a significant element in the messaging. It’s noted that CNN has been involved in propagating narratives to support certain political candidates, with employees admitting to this practice. The mention of COVID fatigue indicates a readiness to latch onto new stories as they arise. The focus will soon transition to climate change, similar to the previous political agenda. The conversation ends with a question about the head of the network.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the growing urgency of climate-related concerns and how global attention has shifted in recent years. Speaker 1 states: “the phenomenal change that's come about in the last two or three years is that probably isn't a child over the age of six that isn't deeply concerned about climate change. I mean, there were reports in the past, but now the focus of the world are on those problems, whether it's droughts, whether it's storms, whether it's the seaside being ruined, just undermining life.” This underscores a marked increase in concern among younger generations about climate issues and a perception that the world’s focus has shifted to problems such as droughts, storms, and the degradation of seaside environments, which are framed as threats to life. Speaker 0 adds context by noting that “Corona has slightly, I'm afraid, eclipsed the importance of this conversation. No one's saying corona isn't incredibly devastating, but actually, we do need to think long term about the planet.” This introduces a tension between the immediate impacts of the pandemic and the need for long-term planetary thinking, suggesting that the pandemic has overshadowed discussions about climate, even while acknowledging its devastation. Speaker 1 elaborates on the consequence of this shift, characterizing the pandemic’s impact as “a distraction. Well, more than a distraction. It's a tragedy, but it does have that knock on effect.” This phrase emphasizes that the pandemic is not only a distraction but also has broader knock-on effects that affect attention to climate and long-term planetary considerations. Together, the speakers convey a sense of heightened public concern about climate change among young people, the prominence of climate-related problems such as droughts, storms, and coastal degradation, and the challenge posed by the COVID-19 pandemic in diverting attention away from long-term environmental planning. The exchange indicates a tension between addressing urgent, immediate crises and maintaining focus on long-term planetary health.

Climate change is now a crisis, requiring immediate action. Sea levels are rising, flooding streets, wildfires are raging, and extreme storms and heat affect the DMV area.

NBC News reported that if Joe Biden declares a national climate emergency, he could have COVID-like powers similar to 9/11 emergency powers. The Center For Biological Diversity estimated he could have around 130 wartime-like powers to implement the Green New Deal without Congress. The Biden White House is considering this move, potentially giving Biden dictatorial powers to push through the Green New Deal without democratic approval. This has sparked concerns and is widely covered in the media.

- "The catastrophic phenomena dominantly driving and common to the Permian mass extinction as well as the contemporary AGW mass extinction." - "The rising co two levels." - "In AGW the surge is initially man made and partially compensated by ecosystem sequestering the man made co two." - "However whereas on average about 60% of man made co two was sequestered twenty years ago nowadays this is only on average about 40%." - "The rising global temperature." - "In the great dying this resulted in a catastrophic temperature rise of 11 degrees Celsius because of a massive release of co two and methane." - "These two phenomena, temperature rise and greenhouse gas release, drive each other."

Humanity is failing on climate policy objectives, leading to extreme weather impacting global life and the weaponization of its outcomes. Climate protests in New York and other cities highlight the urgency. Natural disasters in Morocco, Libya, and elsewhere claim lives, while islands and countries disappear underwater. Tornadoes and deserts expand into new territories. Amidst all this, Moscow launches a war, causing the deaths of tens of thousands. We must unite to stop this aggression, focusing our capabilities and energy on addressing these challenges while restraining the use of nuclear weapons and all methods of war. Our unity is crucial to prevent further aggression.

Humanity is failing on climate policy objectives, leading to extreme weather impacting global life and the weaponization of its outcomes. Climate protests in New York and other cities highlight the urgency. Natural disasters claim lives in Morocco, Libya, and other countries, causing islands and nations to vanish underwater. Tornadoes and deserts expand into new territories. Amidst all this, Moscow launches a devastating war, killing tens of thousands. We must unite to stop this aggression, focusing our capabilities and energy on addressing these challenges while restraining the use of nuclear weapons and the tools of war. Our unity is crucial to prevent further aggression.

Climate experts have been making incorrect predictions for decades. In 1969, Paul Ehrlich claimed that everyone would disappear in 20 years, but he is still being cited today. In the 1970s, experts warned of a new ice age caused by air pollution. Leonard Nimoy even made a video about it. However, when the ice age didn't happen, they shifted to global warming. In 1989, a UN official said rising sea levels would wipe out entire nations by 2000. Al Gore also made incorrect predictions in his documentary, "An Inconvenient Truth." Despite these failures, the media continues to amplify these claims. Climate change is a natural process that we cannot control, and there are both upsides and downsides to it.

Last September 21, the northern hemisphere tilted away from the sun, and scientists reported with unprecedented alarm that the North Polar ice cap is, in their words, falling off a cliff. In their findings, one study estimated that it could be completely gone during summer in less than twenty two years. A second, separate study to be presented by US Navy researchers later this week warns it could happen in as little as seven years, Seven years from now. The dual projections emphasize the urgency of the projections about Arctic ice futures and outline two distinct timelines for potential disappearance.

Skeptics struggle to secure funding and face difficulty in publishing due to alarmist journal editors. The importance of publication lies in researchers' career advancement. Alarmist researchers dominate the conversation by publishing alarming papers, which are then amplified by the media. Various aspects of life, from transportation to childhood obesity, are attributed to climate change. The media's influence causes activists to panic, fearing the potential extinction of the human race.

The conversation centers on the claim that Iran has faced long-running weather manipulation and climate intervention, pushing the idea that weather warfare is being waged against Iran for decades and that this has contributed to severe droughts, disrupted rainfall, and harsh living conditions amid sanctions. Dane Wiggington, founder of geoengineeringwatch.org, leads the discussion with Clayton and Natalie, presenting a narrative that goes beyond mainstream geopolitics to point to covert weather manipulation as a central factor. Key points and assertions include: - Weather warfare against Iran has “gone back forty years plus,” with Iranian meteorologists and former president Ahmadinejad publicly asserting that NATO was cutting off precipitation, thereby destabilizing weather patterns and food production. The guests describe this as ongoing warfare that destabilizes populations. - The practice is described as not just about Iran; the tactic, historically used by the US in conflicts such as Vietnam (Project Popeye), has led to international attempts to regulate weather modification (INMOD treaties) in 1976, though the speakers argue that nations still engage in such activities over their own citizens. - The mechanism of climate engineering is presented as two main methods: diminishing and dispersing precipitation, and completely cutting it off. The discussion highlights ionosphere heater technologies (notably HARP) as tools to heat portions of the atmosphere, creating high-pressure heat domes that steer moisture patterns and produce chemically nucleated rainfall or drought. This is linked to current US West Coast heat waves and is described as a deliberate manipulation of moisture cycles. - The oil-cloud phenomenon in Iran is described as a result of such warfare, with reports of oil covering streets, doors, cars, and lungs from inhalation of aerosolized oil. The guest connects this to broader environmental impacts, including toxic precipitation and altered air quality, and claims similar operations have caused dramatic weather and pollution events elsewhere. - The discussion cites historical and contemporary examples to illustrate broader patterns: Kuwait’s oil wells torched by US forces allegedly to justify infrastructure moves; allegations that US military operations use climate intervention as a weapon; and a claim that blizzards and chemical cooling downs (including alleged chemical ice nucleation) have been weaponized in various regions, including the Gulf Coast and the US Northeast. - The conversation ties climate engineering to geopolitical strategies, arguing that portraying Iran as a nuclear threat serves to justify aggressive actions and to obscure the manipulation of weather and climate systems. Netanyahu’s warnings and statements about water and control of resources are presented as part of this broader manipulation. - The speakers argue that the US and allied governments are maintaining control through deception, suggesting that media coverage is insufficient or complicit. They claim that mainstream outlets like Forbes “cover” for the narrative of cloud theft and downplay the severity of drought and weather manipulation in Iran, while asserting that Western North American snowpack is at record lows, much of it chemically nucleated, reducing runoff. - They emphasize the scale of water stress domestically, warning that tens of millions in the US Southwest could face severe water shortages, with reservoirs like Lake Powell and Lake Mead described as near dead pools with substantial sedimentation reducing usable capacity. - The dialogue connects climate engineering to broader biosphere collapse and asserts that the greatest single source of pollution is the US military. They argue that climate engineering is the crown jewel weapon used to inflict misery while remaining hidden, urging listeners to awaken, form supportive networks, and push for action at the legislative level. - They reference the documentary The Dimming as a resource for evidence of climate engineering and invite audiences to explore geoengineeringwatch.org for ongoing information. Throughout, Dane Wiggington reiterates that climate engineering and weather manipulation are central, ongoing operations that intersect with geopolitics, media coverage, and public health. The conversation maintains a consistent stance that these interventions are real, pervasive, and inadequately addressed by mainstream discourse, urging viewers to seek out more information and grassroots advocacy.

When searching for "climate change" on Google, most results come from the UN. Mainstream news sources and government organizations dominate the top listings. Despite claims of 868 million results, only 422 are visible after scrolling through. Official websites and news outlets are prevalent, with no sign of personal blogs or alternative sources. The discrepancy raises questions about the true extent of information available online.

A federal report predicted possible catastrophic warming of the Earth by the 1990s due to strong climate change. Scientists claim that if action isn't taken within the next eight or nine years, major cities worldwide could go underwater.

When searching "climate change" on Google, the results mainly come from the UN and official news sources. Despite claiming 868 million results, only 422 are shown, mostly from reputable organizations. Blogs and independent sources are scarce, raising questions about the missing content on the internet.

There has been a media blackout on Pentagon files leaked recently, considered the biggest since Snowden. Fox News refused to cover it, citing sensitive Ukraine blueprints. John Kirby, Biden's spokesperson, urged media not to report on the leak, calling it a blueprint for war.

The speaker discusses a perceived pattern of media fatigue and how news stories are latched onto. They mention that their focus was previously on removing Trump from office and now it will shift towards climate change. They speculate that climate change awareness will involve showing videos of declining ice and the impact on the economy. The speaker also mentions the head of the network and their counsel discussing the next pandemic-like story, which they believe will have longevity. They anticipate climate change being the next big story, similar to COVID, and suggest it may be driven by fear.

When searching "climate change" on Google, most results come from the UN. Top stories are from mainstream sources like CNBC and NASA. After scrolling through 43 pages, only 422 results are found, mostly from official organizations and news outlets. Blogs and independent sources are scarce, raising questions about the missing billions of results promised initially.

Climate change is a major concern, with the government prioritizing it over other threats like Russia or China. Activists have significant influence, and the issue has permeated all levels of government. Some link climate change to population control, believing it's a tactic to limit people's impact on the environment. This connection may not be obvious to everyone, but it's a key goal for those advocating for climate action.

Climate change poses a significant threat to national security and the military. The current administration dismisses its reality, despite clear evidence of its acceleration. If unaddressed, rising sea levels could submerge major military bases like Norfolk, Virginia, within our lifetimes. Climate events lead to instability, chaos, and conflict, increasing the demand for military disaster response. Historically, the Pentagon has recognized climate change as a national security threat, but this acknowledgment has waned. Progress has been made in transitioning to renewable energy, with two-thirds of energy at bases now sourced from renewables. The military can lead the charge toward net zero carbon emissions, as delaying action will only worsen the impact of climate change. The next president has the opportunity to enhance military capabilities through technological advancements that can benefit the entire country.

Speaker 0 notes a dramatic shift over the last two or three years: probably no child over the age of six is not deeply concerned about climate change. He points to a transformation in awareness, implying that climate issues have moved from a distant or theoretical concern to something that many children are actively thinking about and worrying over. He references concrete manifestations that shape public attention: droughts, storms, and the seaside being ruined, which together undermine life and daily existence. This framing emphasizes how climate-related events are presented as immediate and tangible threats that affect livelihoods and environments, reinforcing the impression that the problem is no longer abstract but present and pressing for younger generations. Speaker 1 expands the discussion by noting that corona has, unfortunately, eclipsed the importance of this climate conversation. He acknowledges the immense devastation caused by the coronavirus but stresses the need to think long term about the planet. This observation places the climate discussion in the context of a broader global emergency, suggesting that the immediacy and scale of the pandemic have drawn attention away from ongoing environmental concerns that require sustained, future-oriented thinking. The remark implies a tension between addressing an acute crisis and maintaining focus on longer-term planetary health and sustainability. Speaker 0 responds by characterizing the pandemic as a distraction, and more than that, as a tragedy with knock-on effects. He uses the word “distraction” to describe how corona competes for attention that might otherwise be directed toward climate issues, while also calling it a tragedy to acknowledge its severe impact. The phrase “knock on effect” underscores that the pandemic’s consequences reverberate beyond the immediate health crisis, potentially influencing climate-related responses, policy priorities, and public awareness in ways that complicate efforts to address environmental challenges. Overall, the exchange highlights a shared concern that climate change has become a salient issue for children and that global attention to environmental problems competes with other major crises, most notably the COVID-19 pandemic. It also underscores a tension between the urgency of immediate crises and the necessity of sustained, long-term planetary thinking.

Climate change is the biggest threat to the world. Time is running out, and this is a fact. Finally, everyone in America is acknowledging it.