TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker asks about President Biden's conflicts of interest regarding sanctions on individuals who have done business with his family. They mention a report alleging that the First Son's company received $3,500,000 from a Russian woman. The speaker questions how Biden is navigating these conflicts and asks for an explanation of the $3,500,000. The other speaker responds by saying they have no confirmation of the report's accuracy and no further details. When asked about conflicts of interest, the speaker questions what those conflicts would be and points out that Biden has sanctioned more oligarchs than before, suggesting it is not a conflict of interest.

President Biden was asked about allegations regarding his family's business interests in Ukraine and China. Polling by the Associated Press suggests that a significant number of Americans, including Democrats, believe he acted illegally or unethically. Biden denied the allegations, stating that he did not interact with his son and brother's foreign business associates. He refused to comment further on the matter. It was noted that he seemed more interested in addressing questions about Ukraine.

The Daily Mail obtained a voice mail from Joe Biden to his son, Hunter, discussing a New York Times article about Hunter's business dealings in China. This contradicts Joe Biden's previous claims of having no knowledge of his son's business ventures. The article in question was published in December 2018 and focused on Hunter's connections with a man named Yi Xiaming, who was later arrested for corruption. Hunter referred to another individual involved in the dealings as the "spy chief of China." Joe Biden has denied any involvement or knowledge of his son's overseas business activities. However, this voice mail proves otherwise, exposing his dishonesty.

A person criticizes Joe Biden, saying that many people have died and more will die unless he becomes smarter. Joe Biden is then challenged about his intelligence and education, with the other person claiming that he did not attend Delaware State University and graduated near the bottom of his class. The person tells Joe Biden not to use the word "smart" with them because there is nothing smart about him. They also mention that Joe Biden has accomplished nothing in his 47 years of public service.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 about a testimony where their son claims they were frequently on speaker phone discussing business with a business associate. Speaker 1 denies ever speaking to the gentleman and dismisses the question as lousy. Speaker 0 thanks Speaker 1, addressing them as Mr. President.

Speaker 1 argues that a scandal exists that is bad for Biden, but it can't be verified, while insignificant things are discussed. Speaker 1 claims the laptop was found, but the family is in hiding. Speaker 1 believes the media is fake and social media is the only way to get their voice out. Speaker 0 recalls Speaker 1 saying the media is discredited to ensure negative reports are not believed. Speaker 1 denies having to discredit Speaker 0, saying they discredited themself. Speaker 1 accuses Speaker 0 of inappropriately bringing up tough questions from the beginning, questions Speaker 1 claims Joe Biden is never asked. Speaker 1 states that Speaker 0's first statement was about asking tough questions, which Speaker 1 deems inappropriate. Speaker 1 ends the interview early.

During the interview, they discussed an email mentioning "10 held by H for the big guy." They inferred that the "big guy" referred to President Biden. The AUSA interjected and said she didn't want to ask about the "big guy" or dad, implying that Joe Biden may be involved in Hunter Biden's transactions.

Joe Biden has denied involvement in his family's business deals, but witnesses claim otherwise. They believe he lied about interacting with Hunter Biden's associates and is the closer for their business dealings with foreign interests. The speaker challenges the left to prove otherwise before yielding the floor.

Speaker 0 denies any knowledge or discussion about his business or his family's business with his son or anyone else. Speaker 1 reveals that Stephanie, who was vice president, approved a response to a 2015 story about Hunter Biden's connection to Burisma Energy Company. It is also mentioned that Biden's family received less than $1,000,000 from a Chinese firm.

The speaker claims that the biggest scandal was when their campaign was spied on, but the other person disagrees, saying there is no evidence. The speaker insists that it is all over the place and that it was bad for Biden. The other person explains that they can't put on things they can't verify. The speaker continues to assert that it has been verified and that they got caught. The other person denies knowing about it.

President Biden was asked about his interactions with his son's business partners and whether he would provide his bank records. He was also questioned about the possibility of being impeached.

The speaker was asked about polling data that suggests a majority of Americans, including some Democrats, believe they acted illegally or unethically regarding their family's business interests. The speaker refused to comment and denied any interaction with their son and brother's foreign business associates, calling it a bunch of lies.

Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of discrediting themselves by avoiding questions about Biden's son and alleged corruption. Speaker 1 questions the validity of the Hunter Biden laptop story, sourced from Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani. Speaker 0 insists it's a crucial issue to investigate Biden's alleged corruption involving China, Ukraine, and Russia. Speaker 1 argues the story lacks verification. Speaker 0 counters by pointing out the laptop's existence and the Biden family's response. The conversation escalates as Speaker 0 emphasizes the significance of the scandal and Speaker 1 questions its validity.

Joe Biden is seen schmoozing at a political event in South Carolina, with his son Hunter closely observing. As Joe engages with people, Hunter waits for the right moment to approach him for business matters. They discuss Hunter's firm and the possibility of working something out. Joe then resumes schmoozing while Hunter and another man step aside to conduct business separately. This sequence of events is seen as circumstantial but potentially damaging.

The speaker criticized someone for making inappropriate and false personal comments. They mentioned that meeting with President Biden is challenging because he is intelligent, curious, and pays attention to details.

Joe Biden is seen schmoozing at a political event in South Carolina, with his son Hunter closely watching his every move. As soon as the conversation turns to business, Hunter approaches and they discuss something. It seems like Hunter is involved in a firm and Joe mentions having hard money. They exchange something, and then Joe goes back to schmoozing while the men step away to conduct business separately. This sequence of events is seen as circumstantial but potentially damaging.

Joe Biden is seen schmoozing at a political event in South Carolina, with his son Hunter closely observing. As Joe engages with others, Hunter approaches him when the conversation turns to business. They discuss Hunter's firm and the possibility of working something out. Hunter mentions having hard money, and Joe offers his support. Afterward, Joe resumes schmoozing while the men step away to conduct business separately. This sequence of events is presented as circumstantial evidence that suggests Joe's involvement in questionable dealings.

Speaker 1 accuses the media of bias for not covering a supposed scandal involving Biden. Speaker 0 defends the need for verification. Speaker 1 claims the scandal can be verified due to a laptop. The conversation escalates with accusations of media bias and unfair questioning. The interview is abruptly ended.

Speaker 0 asks Biden about the allegations of illegal or unethical behavior regarding his family's business interests in Ukraine and China. Speaker 1 denies the claims, calling them lies. Speaker 0 mentions the lawsuits, but Speaker 1 again denies any interaction.

Hunter Biden's involvement with a Ukrainian energy company while his father, Joe Biden, was Vice President is questioned. Joe Biden claims he didn't know what his son was doing and only found out after he joined the board. He trusts his son and sees no reason to investigate further. The interviewer suggests that as Vice President, Joe Biden should have been more aware of his family's activities, but Joe Biden dismisses the idea. He deflects by mentioning the issues surrounding Trump's family. Joe Biden believes there is no evidence to suggest any wrongdoing on his son's part.

Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of selling access to the president through his son's job at a gas company. Speaker 1 denies the claim and challenges Speaker 0 to do physical activities together. Speaker 1 defends his son, stating that no one has accused him of wrongdoing. Speaker 0 mentions hearing the accusation on MSNBC, but Speaker 1 disputes this. Speaker 1 criticizes Speaker 0's lack of backbone. Speaker 2 comments on Speaker 1's defensive and angry response, claiming that it reveals the real Joe Biden. Speaker 2 asserts that Joe Biden sent his son to peddle influence overseas, and when confronted, Joe Biden denies it, claiming that the mainstream media has not reported it.

President Biden denies discussing business matters with his son or family members. He claims to have never spoken to his son about it and avoids any knowledge or involvement in their business dealings. When asked if he stands by his statement of not discussing his son's overseas affairs, he affirms his stance.

Speaker 1 insisted that a story should be aired because it is "bad for Biden," while Speaker 0 refused because it "can't be verified," specifically referencing a laptop. Speaker 1 claimed the laptop story is "one of the biggest scandals" and that the family is in hiding. Speaker 1 accused the media of being "fake" and said social media is the only way to get his voice out. Speaker 0 claimed Speaker 1 once said the media was discredited to ensure negative stories would not be believed. Speaker 1 denied this. Speaker 1 contrasted the interview with what he characterized as "softball" interviews given to Joe Biden. Speaker 1 took issue with the interview beginning with the interviewer stating there would be "tough questions." Speaker 1 then ended the interview.

Speaker 1 argues the administration is targeting its political opponents and notes, "it seemed very clear to me in congressional the testimony," asking, "what an FBI director is doing, taking memos from the FBI and leaking them to the New York Times." He claims "the very same people that were coming after us ... went after your brother" and that "They were trying to destroy my father. They were trying to destroy me, and they were trying to destroy the Trump organization." Speaker 0 says he's not playing coy and asks if what's happening now resembles what happened to him. Speaker 1 fires a barrage: "Did we raid Biden's home?" "Did we weaponize every AG and DA, you know, against Biden?" "Did we put Biden in a courtroom every single day, 91 felony counts that have all been overturned for my father now, right, for nonsense to try and destroy his life?"

I'm here with my father, and I want to make sure that anyone he knows will regret not following my instructions. I'm waiting for a call with him, and it seems like a shakedown, but I won't comment on that. It's suspicious how uncurious you are about it. Are you protecting the Bidens? The FBI won't answer if it's a shakedown, and that speaks volumes about them.