reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker addresses rumors about the moon landing, stating "the moon landing was fake" and "the moon land moon landings all were fake," and claiming "I was the person" involved. "I'm serious. I'm dead serious." They declare "The conspiracy theorists were right on this on this occasion" and ask, "Why the hell if you're telling the truth, why would you do it? Why are you telling me?" They argue it is important "for people to know the truth," calling the event "a massive fraud, an unparalleled fraud perpetrated against them." They say "They should know" because people are "already suspicious of the government" and "they may as well have their suspicions confirmed." They add "Justified." Finally, they question "And this why now? I mean, we're almost at the thirty year anniversary. What what took so long?"

The speaker expresses a desire to be an astronaut and discusses the idea that the moon landing was faked during the Cold War to outpace the Russians. They point out perceived inconsistencies in the moon landing evidence, such as the absence of plane parts. The conversation shifts to President Bush and the secret society Skull and Bones at Yale, claiming that both he and his father were members who engaged in disturbing initiation rituals, including one where Bush was said to have masturbated in front of his father.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 engage in a candid interview about why the interview is being conducted and a startling revelation connected to a long-term secret. Speaker 0 asks why Speaker 1 finally agreed to talk after multiple letters, and what motivates this interview. Speaker 1 explains that, at first, he was drawn to the opportunity and challenge of making the film, approaching it like any other production and not fully considering the long-term effects on society if it were ever discovered. He says he has always been conflicted about it, but did not realize that conflict until years later. The conversation moves to a provocative claim: the rumor about the fake moon landing. Speaker 0 asks for clarification, and Speaker 1 states plainly that the moon landings were fake, and that the rumors were true. This admission comes as a surprise to Speaker 0, who had only heard the rumor in general terms, not a definitive claim. Speaker 1 confirms the assertion and explains that this is the core of a fifteen-year secrecy. Speaker 0 questions how such a claim could be discussed or released, noting that they had planned to cover several of Speaker 1’s films, including Barry Lyndon, The Killing, Clockwork Orange, and what appears to be a reference to “mean,” and expressing curiosity about why this revelation would be disclosed to a relatively unknown interviewer rather than to a major outlet like CNN. Speaker 1 repeats that the rumors were true and clarifies the timing: the fifteen-year period is connected to the disclosure. Speaker 0 then connects the fifteen-year delay to a potential “time release” of a major secret, suggesting that Speaker 1 is using the interviewer to conceal and eventually reveal this information on a scheduled timeline. Speaker 1 closes with a mention of his upcoming film Eyes Wide Shut, implying a link between the secret and his forthcoming project. The dialogue centers on the tension between making films, the societal impact of their content, and the strategic management of a years-long, high-stakes revelation.

The speakers discuss various conspiracy theories surrounding the moon landing. They question the lack of evidence and technology, claiming that NASA taped over the telemetry data and lost the technology to go back to the moon. They also criticize the lunar lander's appearance and the astronauts' spacewalks. The speakers argue that it is impossible to survive in a vacuum and point out inconsistencies in the Challenger explosion. They question the authenticity of moon rocks, the absence of stars in NASA's images, and the construction of the lunar module. They conclude that it is unlikely that humans have ever been to the moon.

The speaker challenges the notion that the question about human space travel is childish, insisting that the question about why nobody has been to the Moon in a long time is their own question, not a child’s. They state, “That's not, an eight year old. Why has nobody been to the moon in such a long time? That's not an eight year old's question. That's my question. I wanna know,” signaling a personal desire to understand the gap in lunar exploration. They indicate they think they know the answer but still want to know for certain, suggesting a belief or suspicion about what happened. The speaker asserts, “Because we didn't go and that's the way it happened,” presenting a direct claim about the historical sequence of events related to Moon missions. The statement implies a definitive view that the absence of Moon landings is the reason for the current situation, described as “the way it happened.” Finally, the speaker adds a reflective note about the possibility that if the Moon landing did not happen as people recall, it would be informative to know why it didn’t happen. They express, “And if it didn't happen, it's nice to know why it didn't happen,” underscoring a desire for an explanation or justification for the lack of recent Moon missions. In essence, the excerpt centers on a personal demand for clarity about lunar exploration history, emphasizing that the question is intrinsic to the speaker rather than a child’s curiosity, and linking the continuation of Moon missions to a straightforward assertion that “we didn't go,” while acknowledging a potential interest in understanding the reasons behind that absence.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss memories of the Apollo moon landing and how people experienced it at the time. Speaker 0 begins by recalling, very clearly, that anybody alive then would remember waking up with their parents and going down to watch the moon landing. Speaker 1 denies that this memory is accurate, saying, “No you didn't. No you,” and then interrupts, clarifying that “there wasn’t any television. There wasn’t anybody taking a picture.” Speaker 1 explains that what Speaker 0 watched was animation, and that what they saw was not a real image but something they associated with the event. Speaker 0 acknowledges having “very hazy memories,” noting that “we saw was we all gathered around the old Curve Top Radio.” The image they remember is their family listening rather than watching on television. Speaker 1 elaborates on the moment by describing the scene in more detail: people gathered and listening to discussions about “how many feet we're going to the left and right.” In the memory, the moment culminates with the words, “contact light, engine stop,” followed by Neil Armstrong’s famous message, “Houston, Tranquility Base, the Eagle has landed.” Speaker 0 confirms that this moment was very exciting. Speaker 1 comments that Armstrong’s line, “the Eagle has landed,” was “Not a bad line.” The two speakers reminisce about the excitement surrounding the event and the humanity of the moment, with Speaker 1 affirming the significance of Armstrong’s transmission and ending on a note of shared excitement and approval.

Speaker 0 points out that part of the reason people doubt the moon landing is the story of bringing back 842 pounds of moon rocks, which are now on display in museums. They note that there was a rock allegedly misidentified or mislabeled in a museum, and it was given to a foreign dignitary after testing. Speaker 1 adds that Neil Armstrong said, in his own words, he saw a rock on the surface of the moon, picked it up specifically for the prime minister of The Netherlands, and put it in his pocket. He “brought it, gave it to him,” they sealed it in a box and immediately put it in a museum in a clear box. The curator of the museum reportedly saw the speaker’s movie, A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon, and in the middle of the night opened the hermetically sealed container, which they presumed would stay sealed for all time, put it under a microscope, and it turned out to be a piece of petrified wood. He notes it looks out of this world, but unless trees are growing on the moon, it’s a fake moon rock. The speaker then asks, if the moon rocks are fake, what about the moon mission?

Speaker 0 recalls a vivid memory of watching the moon landing with their parents. However, Speaker 1 corrects them, stating that there was no live television coverage at the time. Speaker 1 explains that what they saw was actually an animation, and suggests that Speaker 0 may have associated it with their own memories. Speaker 0 admits to having hazy recollections, and Speaker 1 mentions a legal name.

Some people believe that the moon landing was a hoax, but the speakers in the video provide evidence to prove otherwise. They explain how a laser can be used to detect manmade equipment on the moon and show footage of the laser beam being reflected back. They also address skeptics who question the authenticity of the lunar module and the footage of the redocking. Despite the conspiracy theories, the speakers emphasize the importance of space exploration and the desire to go beyond low earth orbit. The video ends with a powerful image of Earth from the moon.

Let's examine the photo. The name badge says Aldrin, so it's me, but you can't see my face in the helmet. This has been a secret for nearly fifty years. On July 20, 1969, Neil Armstrong and I pulled off humanity's first extraterrestrial prank. What was the scariest moment? Surprisingly, there wasn't one. Why haven't we returned to the moon? It’s a question I have too. We need to understand why we stopped if we want to continue exploring. Money plays a big role; new rockets and missions require funding. After our mission, we toured the world and saw signs saying, "We did it." It wasn't just an American achievement; it was a global one, and that sense of shared accomplishment was incredibly rewarding.

The speaker critiques the India moon landing, describing the footage as “the worst” and claiming it looks like “Tari graphics with ping ping ping ping ping.” They describe the landing as appearing to land in a cartoon-like manner, with a small Tari graphics figure landing, followed by Indians clapping and saying, “we did it.” The speaker says this is the same thing as the nineteen sixties moon landing, asserting it is “the same exact thing.” They recount people watching Nixon call the moon and mock the notion, contrasting it with experiences like not getting service on a mountain hike, and question how Nixon could have a phone that connected in space and “was sitting there chatting,” imagining a late-night infomercial scenario: “6 of those… $39.99… I’ll charge your card already 5 payments.” They argue the programming of television through infomercials shapes perception, suggesting that people equate Nixon calling the moon with an infomercial, such that they believe he must have called them. The speaker notes that if discussions about these matters are laughable, many respond seriously when such footage is shown, and they claim, “you don’t trust the science.” They state, “The they’re lying to you,” and that one should laugh at how much they are being lied to, because recognizing deception enables seeing through other lies. The speaker asserts that understanding what one is living on reveals a reality that is “completely different than what you were sold,” and that this realization prompts the brain to question things and ask questions. The overall message is that exposing perceived deceptions in media and historical narratives leads to questioning broader claims about reality.

The speaker discusses the missing telemetry data from the Apollo 11 mission and the inability to locate it. They mention that even NASA's Goddard Space Center and other institutions don't have the data. The speaker suggests that the tapes may have been misplaced. They also mention the lunar laser reflector experiment, which is still operational and allows a laser to be pointed at the Apollo 11 landing site on the moon. The speaker visits Professor Carol Alley at the University of Maryland to discuss this experiment.

Zoe asks what is the favorite thing about space. She also wonders why nobody has been to the moon in a long time. She thinks she knows the answer because we did go there before, but she wants to know why it stopped. Understanding why something stopped in the past is important if we want to continue doing it in the future.

Nobody went to the moon, and I want to know why. If it didn't happen, it's important to understand why so we can continue in the future. Money plays a significant role in keeping things going.

Let's examine the photo. The name badge says Aldrin, so it's me, but you can't see my face due to the helmet. I've kept a secret for nearly fifty years: on July 20, 1969, Neil Armstrong and I pulled off humanity's first extraterrestrial prank. What was the scariest moment of the journey? Surprisingly, there wasn't one. Why hasn't anyone been to the moon in so long? I believe it's because we stopped going, and understanding that is crucial for future endeavors. Money plays a big role; new rockets cost more, and other priorities compete for funding. After our mission, we realized the world felt united in our achievement, with signs proclaiming "we did it." It wasn't just an American success; it was a global one, and that sense of shared accomplishment was incredibly rewarding.

The speaker expresses their desire to become an astronaut and mentions the need to study flying or science. However, another person interrupts, claiming that the first moon landing was fake due to the Cold War rivalry with Russia. They point out the lack of windows and a pod-like structure in the footage, as well as the absence of plane wreckage on the ground. The speaker ends abruptly, stating that they no longer wish to pursue a career as an astronaut.

The speaker questions the authenticity of the moon landings, pointing out discrepancies in shadows in a photo. They argue that the technology used then should have led to further space exploration by now. The destruction of moon landing equipment is seen as suspicious, suggesting a cover-up of fraud. The speaker believes it is more plausible that the moon landings were faked in a television studio on Earth.

"Why has nobody been to the moon in such a long time?" "That's not, an eight year old's question. That's my question." "Because we didn't go there and that's the way it happened." "If it didn't happen, it's nice to know why it didn't happen." "Money is a good thing." "If you want to buy new things, new rockets, instead of keep doing the same thing over, then it's gonna cost more money, and other things need more money too." "Not just us, not just America, but we, the world, different country." "They felt like they were part of what we were able to do, and that made us feel very good."

Michael Collins fidgets nervously while Neil Armstrong speaks confidently. They discuss their moon landing experience, showing films and slides. Collins, who remained in lunar orbit, contradicts himself about seeing stars. Armstrong claims not to recall seeing stars, with Collins mistakenly filling in. There are discrepancies in the transcript attributing statements to the wrong astronaut. The video suggests a cover-up to hide Collins' lack of moonwalk experience.

Speaker 0 asks, "Why has nobody been to the moon in such a long time?" and says, "That's not an eight year old's question. That's my question. I wanna know, but I think I know. Because we didn't go there, happened." He adds, "And if it didn't happen, it's nice to know why it didn't happen because there's no gravity." He continues, "And I'm a diver, a scuba diver. And when you get down underneath the water, you're floating." He then asks, "Zoe, what did you say? Thank you." The segment ends with, "You are very, very."

The speaker jokes that the “rocket going to the moon” is actually just the sun being blocked, and then says, “If you think we’re going to the moon, I’ll sell you a time share for $49.” They suggest someone could be the first on the moon because “we never went,” citing a book titled We Never Went to the Moon by Bill Casing, which allegedly explains how there are no stars. The speaker questions, “If you were on the moon, wouldn’t you see the stars,” calling this funny, and references “your little setup here who filmed all this.” They claim that “they failed every single time they were trying to go to the moon,” noting failures “like, 55 times in a row,” but assert that “this time they decided to make it.” Buzz Aldrin is said to have admitted “we never went to the moon,” which the speaker finds humorous. They critique the footage on grounds of lighting and reflections, stating, “The lighting’s all off. The reflections are wrong.” They argue that the footsteps are just “sands in the desert of Utah and Arizona,” or “Mercury, Nevada, actually, if I wanna be specific.” Finally, they conclude that “if you believe we went to the moon, I got a time share to sell you.”

The speaker questions the authenticity of the moon landing, citing various reasons such as the lack of human presence on the moon since 1972, the absence of flybys around the moon, and the behavior of the Apollo astronauts during press conferences. They also mention discrepancies in the photographs and videos, including intersecting shadows and missing telemetry data. Another speaker expresses skepticism about the moon landing, while a third speaker defends its authenticity, referring to the fuel capacity of the Saturn 5 rocket and the presence of laser reflectors on the moon. The conversation ends with a discussion about conspiracy theories and the importance of critical thinking.

Speaker 0: Returning from the moon, filled with excitement. Speaker 1: We've all pondered the significance of this first lunar landing. Can each of you share what it means to us? Speaker 2: I believe this mission was inevitable, regardless of setting a specific goal. Our previous space flights showed our potential. The ease with which we accomplished this mission proves we were on the right track. It suggests that other problems can be solved with a long-term commitment. We should consider other missions. Speaker 0: I see it as a beginning, not just for this flight, but for the entire program. It marks the start of a new era. Speaker 1: Neil, how much fuel did you have left when you shut down? Speaker 2: My instruments showed less than 30 seconds, possibly around 20. Ground analysis suggests more than that, maybe over 30 or 40.

The speakers discuss their disbelief in the moon landing, citing reasons such as the footage looking fake and the lack of evidence. They mention the Soviet Union's advancements in space and suggest that the Americans faked the moon landing to win the Cold War. They also mention Neil Armstrong's reluctance to give interviews and Bill Clinton's story about a carpenter who doubted the moon landing. The speakers question the missing telemetry data and argue that laser reflectors on the moon are not proof. They claim that the astronauts were afraid for their lives and highlight inconsistencies in moon photographs. They conclude by expressing skepticism about the existence of aliens and the curvature of the Earth.

The excerpt centers on reactions to the way NASA astronauts framed their milestone and a notable moment during a television appearance. It begins with a critique of Neil Armstrong’s characterization of the Apollo achievement as “the beginning of a new era” and “the beginning of a new age.” The speaker suggests Armstrong comes across as someone “forced to read from a script” rather than someone truly convinced of his own words, implying a sense of disconnected delivery or insincerity in the televised presentation of the historic event. This evaluation highlights the tension between the monumental significance attributed to the achievement and the performative tone perceived in the narration surrounding it. A particularly memorable moment is described as an “embarrassing” episode involving Sir Patrick Moore, a famous astronomer and journalist. Moore asks the astronauts whether they could see stars from the Moon. The exact question posed was whether, when looking up at the sky, they could actually see the stars and the solar corona in spite of the glare. This line of inquiry underscores the contrast between the awe suggested by the mission and the practical visual reality experienced by the astronauts during their time on or near the lunar surface. The response to Moore’s question reveals a surprising commonality among the astronauts: none of them remember seeing a single star with the naked eye. The transcript emphasizes that “not one of them surprisingly remembers having seen a single star,” which implies a shared recollection of star visibility being absent during their lunar activities. This absence is attributed to the conditions of sight on the Moon, particularly the glare, but the exact wording stresses the unanimous lack of naked-eye star observations among the crew. The narrative then reinforces this point by stating a general observation: “We were never able to see stars from the lunar surface or on the daylight side of the moon by eye without looking through the optics.” This clarifies that, regardless of location—whether on the surface or in daylight-side conditions—the astronauts did not perceive stars with unaided sight. The statement is reinforced by noting that even Michael Collins, who remained in orbit around the Moon while his crewmates descended to the surface, does not remember seeing a single star: “Even Collins, who was left orbiting the moon while the other two descended on the surface, does not remember seeing a star. I don’t remember seeing any.” In sum, the excerpt juxtaposes the ceremonial framing of the Moon landings with a candid recollection of the visual experience: Armstrong’s grand proclamations contrasted with the astronauts’ shared inability to observe stars without optical assistance, a detail that becomes a focal point of the discussion surrounding the televised portrayal and the practical realities of lunar observation.