TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Scientists are confirming that COVID shots can damage the brain and devastate mental health. Studies reveal increases in ischemic strokes (up 44%), hemorrhagic strokes (up 50%), transient ischemic strokes (up 67%), myasthenia gravis (up 71%), Alzheimer's (up 22%), cognitive impairment (up 138%), depression (up 68%), anxiety disorders (up 44%), and sleep disorders (up 93%), all linked to toxic spike protein accumulation in the brain. To protect yourself, stop further exposure, support detoxification pathways, and ensure an anti-inflammatory diet that supports mitochondrial health.

The speaker claims that the flu vaccine's purpose has shifted from preventing the flu to only lessening symptoms. A Cleveland Clinic study allegedly found the flu vaccine had a negative efficacy of 26.9% last winter. According to the speaker, this means that individuals who received the flu vaccine were 26.9% more likely to contract influenza. The speaker notes the study doesn't detail the pharmaceutical industry's profits from the vaccine or list its side effects. They state the side effects would be less than an mRNA vaccine, as it is a dead virus vaccine. The speaker reiterates that taking the flu shot allegedly makes one almost 27% more likely to get sick than not taking it.

COVID-19 injections are associated with neuropsychiatric disorders, according to an FDA and CDC study. The speaker claims that psychosis is 440 times more likely, dementia 140 times, schizophrenia 315 times, suicidal thoughts 150 times, and homicidal ideation 25 times. Brain clots are allegedly 3,000 times more likely, depression 530 times, and violent behavior 80 times. Cognitive decline is purportedly 115 times more likely and delusions 50 times. The speaker believes psychiatric harm is caused by the accumulation of toxic spike proteins, mRNA, lipid nanoparticles, and other unknown components.

The speaker discusses an asserted link between COVID-19 injections and neuropsychiatric disorders, claiming a strong association. They state that the information comes directly from the FDA and the CDC and promise to leave the study link in the comments. The speaker notes that “these were the thresholds that were all breached for being way over,” and asserts that the items about to be listed are “a more likely determination.” The claim is that these are thresholds or criteria related to the studied association, and the speaker emphasizes that these are “times” of likelihood. Specifically, the speaker lists several neuropsychiatric outcomes and how much more likely they are purported to be following vaccination. They say: psychosis is “four forty times more likely.” Dementia is “140 times” more likely. Schizophrenia is “three fifteen times” more likely. They also mention “Suicidal thoughts,” but the transcript ends before the figure for suicidal thoughts is provided. The speaker frames these figures as a direct consequence of the injections, tying them to the referenced thresholds and thresholds being breached as evidence of a strong association. In summary, the primary claims presented are that there exists a strong association between COVID-19 injections and neuropsychiatric disorders, supported by data from the FDA and CDC, with specific numerical claims that psychosis, dementia, and schizophrenia are markedly more likely post-injection, quantified as 440 times, 140 times, and 315 times more likely, respectively, with a forthcoming figure for suicidal thoughts that is not included in the provided transcript. The overall argument hinges on breached thresholds and the designation of these conditions as more likely determinations following vaccination, as presented by the speaker.

Over 20 years, flu shot rates among seniors rose from 15% to 65%, yet flu deaths continued to climb. An NIH study adjusting for various factors confirmed that flu shots haven't reduced deaths in the elderly. We were astonished by these findings, which hold true in other countries like Australia, France, Canada, and the UK. Despite billions spent, current research suggests flu shots in seniors haven't had the desired impact. The CDC is exploring new strategies but maintains that seniors should still get vaccinated, as it may lessen flu severity or prevent other complications. The CDC may shift towards vaccinating more children and others around seniors to protect them indirectly.

Speaker 0: The transcript cites multiple studies indicating severe behavioral changes in those who receive mRNA shots. A study by Oten colleagues found that the mRNA vaccine mRNA and spike protein were being produced in cerebral arteries of stroke patients. It is stated that the mRNA shot is based on the second largest COVID vaccine safety study ever conducted with eighty five million people in it, which purportedly found a two hundred percent increased risk of stroke after dose two of mRNA shots. The claim is that the vaccine goes to the brain, causes brain damage and neuronal destruction, and that this is reflected in neuropsychiatric conditions. This is linked to a study by Doctor James Thorpe and colleagues, which allegedly identified eighty-six neuropsychiatric safety signals for these COVID shots, including homicide, homicidal tendencies, psychosis, schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, cognitive impairment, and violent behavior, all claimed to be far in excess of what was reported with flu vaccinations, and described as corroborating multiple other studies. The transcript also references a study from Korea finding increased Alzheimer's risks and increased cognitive impairment risks, and another Korea study reporting a massive increased risk of depression, sleep disorders, and anxiety from these injections. The overall assertion is that, based on peer reviewed evidence, the injections damage the brain, cause brain damage resulting in neuropsychiatric conditions.

Speaker 0 states that the study confirms suspicions from the past five years that common sense has deteriorated in the population. The study analyzed the VAERS system from the 1990s to 2024 and examined PRRs (proportional reporting ratios), which measure how many more adverse events occur with the COVID shots compared to the flu shot or other vaccines. It reports 8686 safety signals of neuropsychiatric adverse events, with some up to 3,000 times higher than the flu shot. The safety signal threshold defined by CDC/FDA for PRRs is greater than two, and all reported signals exceeded this threshold. The listed conditions include schizophrenia, dementia, Alzheimer's, cognitive impairment, strokes, brain clots, homicidal tendencies, homicidal behavior, and psychosis, described as people hallucinating and brain damage. The speaker notes that this large number of safety signals aligns with a recent study indicating that people who had strokes showed toxic spike protein production in their brains for up to seventeen months after vaccination, which the speaker suggests explains the observed deterioration in cognitive function.

We're taking a closer look at protecting seniors from the flu, following studies questioning the effectiveness of flu shots for older people. Despite millions of seniors getting vaccinated annually, and 90% of flu deaths occurring in those 65 or older, mass vaccinations haven't reduced deaths. Over twenty years, flu shot rates in seniors rose from 15% to 65%, but flu deaths continued to climb. NIH research confirmed flu shots haven't reduced deaths in the elderly. A study, soon to be published, finds the same poor results in Australia, France, Canada, and the UK. The CDC is exploring new strategies, but still recommends flu shots, as they may lessen flu severity. A likely shift may involve indirectly protecting seniors by vaccinating more children and others around them.

I would not take the flu shot in a million years. Cochrane and BMJ found that people who take the flu shot are protected against the flu, but are 4.4 times more likely to get a non-flu infection. Many people get sick after the flu shot, and that's usually because they are getting something indistinguishable from the flu because the flu shot gives you something called pathogenic priming. The Pentagon published a study by Wolfe in January of this year, that said that the flu shot primes you for coronavirus. The people who got the flu shot were 36% more likely to get coronavirus, and there were six other major studies that say the same thing.

CBS did a report 20 years ago that may shock you. The percentage of seniors getting flu shots sharply increased from 15% to 65%. You'd think flu deaths among the elderly would decrease, but they continued to climb. The NIH did a study, but then suppressed it. CBS got their hands on it, and the study revealed flu shots have not reduced deaths among the elderly. The lead author was not available for comment but a co-author, Dr. Reichert, said they were astonished by the results. They also found the same poor results in other countries like Australia, France, Canada, and the UK. The CDC is now looking at new strategies, but still recommends flu shots. They may shift toward vaccinating more children to protect the elderly.

"People who take the flu shot are protected against the at strain of flu." "They're four point four times more likely to get a non flu infection." "and you might find, and a lot of people do, that they get the flu shot and then they get sick." "They're usually not getting the flu, they're getting something that is indistinguishable from the flu because the flu shot gives you something called pathogenic priming." "The flu shot not only primes you for flu, and it primes you for coronavirus." "What they found is actually the people who got the flu shot were thirty six percent more likely to get coronavirus and that's not a that's not a lone study." "We found six other major studies that say the same thing." "If you get the flu shot, you're more likely to get coronavirus."

"Over twenty years, the percentage of seniors getting flu shots increased sharply from fifteen percent to sixty five percent." "But no matter how they crunched the numbers, they got the same disappointing result. Flu shots have not reduced deaths among the elderly." "We realized that we had incendiary materials." "Doctor Reichert says they thought their study would prove vaccinations had helped." "Were you surprised?" "Astonished." "That study soon to be published finds the same poor results in Australia, France, Canada, and The UK." "Decades of promoting flu shots in seniors and the billions spent haven't had the desired result." "The CDC says they should still get their flu shots, that it could make flu less severe or prevent other problems not reflected in the totals." "But watch for the CDC to shift toward protecting the elderly by vaccinating more children and others around them who could pass the flu."

I would never take the flu shot due to findings from Cochrane and BMJ. Those vaccinated are 4.4 times more likely to get non-flu infections and often experience illnesses similar to the flu. The flu shot can cause pathogenic priming, weakening the immune system and increasing susceptibility to other viral infections, including coronavirus. A Pentagon study indicated that flu shot recipients were 36% more likely to contract coronavirus. Observational data suggests that life expectancy in the elderly has declined since flu shot mandates, and many COVID-19 fatalities were among those who received flu shots. While I oppose mandates, I believe individuals should have the choice to take the flu shot if they wish, similar to other medications.

We're taking a closer look at protecting seniors from the flu, following studies questioning the effectiveness of flu shots in older people. Despite millions of seniors getting vaccinated annually, and ninety percent of flu deaths occurring in those 65 or older, mass vaccinations haven't done the job. Over twenty years, senior vaccination rates rose from fifteen percent to sixty-five percent, yet flu deaths continued to climb. Research confirms flu shots haven't reduced deaths in the elderly in the US and similar results are seen in Australia, France, Canada, and the UK. The CDC is exploring new strategies but still recommends seniors get flu shots. The focus may shift to indirectly protecting seniors by vaccinating more children and those around them.

For over 20 years, flu shot rates in seniors sharply increased, but flu deaths among the elderly continue to climb. NIH researchers conducted a study adjusting for factors masking the shots' benefits, but found flu shots haven't reduced deaths among the elderly. We sought out Dr. Reichert, who confirmed the study's surprising results, which were also found in Australia, France, Canada, and the UK. Despite billions spent, promoting flu shots in seniors hasn't had the desired result. The CDC is considering new strategies but still recommends seniors get vaccinated to lessen flu severity and prevent other issues. The CDC will likely shift towards protecting the elderly by vaccinating more children and those around them.

Truth is out. Scientists are now confirming what many have long suspected. The COVID shots don't just impact your immune system. They can damage your brain and devastate mental health, and the evidence is overwhelming. A recent wave of studies have revealed shocking increases in ischemic strokes up forty four percent, hemorrhagic strokes up fifty percent, transient ischemic strokes or mini strokes up sixty seven percent, myasthenia gravis, a debilitating autoimmune condition up over seventy one percent, Alzheimer's up twenty two percent, cognitive impairment up nearly a hundred and thirty eight percent, depression up over sixty eight percent, anxiety disorders up nearly forty four percent, and sleep disorders up over ninety three percent, all linked to one thing, toxic spike protein accumulation and persistence in the brain. This isn't a conspiracy theory. There's a documented peer reviewed research published studies by documented experts, including by epidemiologist Nicholas Holcher, who says using mRNA to hijack cells in various organ systems to produce a highly toxic spike protein that persists in the body for months or even years was one of the worst ideas in medical history. So what can you do?

Speaker 0 argues against the flu shot, citing Cochrane and BMJ. He says: people who take the flu shot are protected against the at strain of flu, but they’re four point four times more likely to get a non flu infection. He contends that after vaccination you might get sick, not from flu but from something indistinguishable from flu, because the flu shot gives you pathogenic priming that injures your immune system and makes you more likely to get a non flu viral upper respiratory infection. He references a Pentagon story, citing Wolfe (January), stating the flu shot not only primes for flu but primes for coronavirus. In the study, they had a placebo group and a vaccine group to test prophylaxis against coronavirus for military readiness, and they found people who got the flu shot were thirty six percent more likely to get coronavirus. He claims this is not an isolated finding, saying six other major studies report the same thing. Regarding longevity, he references Cochrane’s point about what has happened to longevity in the elderly since flu shot mandates began for elderly people, saying life expectancy has dramatically gone down as the flu shot proliferation increased. He adds an observational note about the COVID vaccine period: “during the COVID crisis” there’s no science on this, but observationally, it tended to be people who got their flu shots—nursing home residents who receive flu shots and first responders who get flu shots are implicated. Speaker 1 interruptions: asks for clarification, saying, “with all due respect, I don’t understand the implications of your position. If you’re right, why wouldn’t it follow that the flu shot should be illegal? You said it’s criminal.” Speaker 0 responds with a partial cut-off fragment, beginning to reply with “to” and then stopping.

The speaker asserts that COVID-19 shots do more than affect the immune system; they can damage the brain and worsen mental health. They claim a wave of studies shows sharp increases in various strokes: ischemic strokes up to 44%, hemorrhagic strokes up to 50%, and transient ischemic attacks (mini strokes) up to 67%. They also report increases in neurological and autoimmune conditions, including myasthenia gravis up 71% and Alzheimer’s disease up 22%. Cognitive impairment is claimed to have risen by nearly 138%, while depression is up 68%, anxiety disorders up 44%, and sleep disorders up 93%. The speaker links all of these increases to “toxic spike protein accumulation and persistence in the brain.” The speaker states this is not a conspiracy theory and cites what they describe as documented peer‑reviewed research and studies by experts. They name epidemiologist Nicholas Holcher, who allegedly says that using mRNA to hijack cells in various organ systems to produce a highly toxic spike protein that persists in the body for months or years was “one of the worst ideas in medical history.” The speaker then asks, “So what can you do?” as a transition to presumably recommendations or actions, though no specific actions are listed in the provided segment.

Speaker 0 asserts that truth is out and that scientists are now confirming long-suspected effects of the COVID-19 shots beyond the immune system, specifically that they can damage the brain and devastate mental health. The claim is that the evidence is overwhelming and that a new wave of studies has revealed significant increases in various neurological and psychiatric conditions, all linked to the presence of toxic spike protein accumulation and persistence in the brain. The summary of claimed study findings includes: - Ischemic strokes: up forty-four percent. - Hemorrhagic strokes: up fifty percent. - Transient ischemic strokes (mini strokes): up sixty-seven percent. - Myasthenia gravis, described as a debilitating autoimmune condition: up over seventy-one percent. - Alzheimer’s disease: up twenty-two percent. - Cognitive impairment: up nearly one hundred and thirty-eight percent. - Depression: up over sixty-eight percent. - Anxiety disorders: up nearly forty-four percent. - Sleep disorders: up over ninety-three percent. Speaker 0 links all of these increases to one cause: toxic spike protein accumulation and persistence in the brain. The statement "This isn't a conspiracy theory" is used to bolster the claim that there is documented peer-reviewed research and published studies supporting these observations. The speaker cites epidemiologist Nicholas Holcher as an example of an expert who has commented on the issue. The quote attributed to Holcher describes using mRNA to hijack cells in various organ systems to produce a highly toxic spike protein that persists in the body for months or even years, and characterizes this approach as one of the worst ideas in medical history. In closing, Speaker 0 poses a question, "So what can you do?" signaling a transition from presenting the alleged findings to offering potential actions or recommendations. The overall message is that COVID-19 vaccines are claimed to cause widespread brain toxicity and mental health problems through persistent spike protein, with purported evidence from peer-reviewed studies and expert commentary cited to support the assertions.

We're taking a closer look at protecting seniors from the flu, following studies questioning the effectiveness of flu shots for older people. While most flu deaths occur in those 65 and older, mass vaccinations haven't done the job. Despite a sharp increase in seniors getting vaccinated over twenty years, flu deaths among the elderly continue to climb. Studies adjusting for various factors still show that flu shots haven't reduced deaths in this group. This same conclusion has been observed in other countries, including Australia, France, Canada, and The UK. The CDC is exploring new strategies, but still advises seniors to get flu shots, as they might lessen flu severity or prevent other complications. The focus may shift towards vaccinating children and others who could transmit the flu to the elderly.

In a million years, I wouldn't take the flu shot. Research from Cochrane and BMJ shows that flu shot recipients are 4.4 times more likely to contract non-flu infections. Many people who get the flu shot often feel sick afterward, usually from something similar to the flu, due to a phenomenon called pathogenic priming, which weakens the immune system. A Pentagon study revealed that flu shot recipients were 36% more likely to contract coronavirus compared to a placebo group. This finding is supported by six other major studies indicating that receiving the flu shot increases the likelihood of getting coronavirus.

Welcome to this talk. Now let me give you the bottom line on this video so you can decide if you want to watch. A large study at the Cleveland Clinic found out that the flu vaccine, the influenza vaccine over last winter, wasn't that effective. In fact, it had a negative efficacy of twenty six point nine percent. In other words, if you took this flu vaccine, you were twenty six point nine percent more likely more likely to get influenza. Now unfortunately the paper doesn't give us details on how much money the pharmaceutical industry made from selling this vaccine with negative efficacy.

Neomycin and kanamycin, found in seven of nine flu vaccines, can cause hearing loss. Research allegedly shows that within 24-48 hours of injection, these substances travel to the inner ear canal, paralyzing nerves and triggering tinnitus, potentially leading to deafness. The speaker suggests doctors don't warn patients about this risk. They claim that seniors, who are often advised to get annual flu shots after age 60, commonly experience tinnitus and hearing loss. The speaker alleges the medical profession profits from selling hearing aids, cochlear implants, and surgeries, without disclosing that vaccines may be the cause of hearing issues.

We have multiple studies now indicating severe behavioral changes in those who receive mRNA shots. a study by Oten colleagues that found the mRNA, vaccine mRNA, and spike protein was being produced in cerebral arteries of stroke patients. the mRNA shot's based on the second largest COVID vaccine safety study ever conducted with eighty five million people in it. They found two hundred percent increased risk of stroke in after dose two of mRNA shots. They actually identified 86 neuropsychiatric safety signals for these COVID shots, including homicide, homicidal tendencies, psychosis, schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, cognitive impairment, violent behavior. All of this stuff was found to be in far exceedance of what was reported with the flu vaccinations. We clearly now know based on the peer reviewed evidence, it damages the brain, causes brain damage resulting in neuropsychiatric conditions.

Speaker 0 discusses this year's flu shot and mentions that flu season is longer than usual. He references headlines about flu vaccine links to higher infections, citing a Cleveland Clinic study involving their employees and the influenza vaccine during this respiratory viral season. In the study, 53,402 employees were observed; 43,857 (82.1%) had received the influenza vaccine by study end. Influenza occurred in 1,079 individuals (2.02%). The cumulative incidence of influenza was similar for vaccinated and unvaccinated groups early on, but over time the cumulative incidence increased more rapidly among the vaccinated. The study includes an adjusted analysis controlling for age, sex, clinical nursing job, employment location, and reports that the risk of influenza was significantly higher for the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated, yielding a calculated vaccine effectiveness of -26.9%. In other words, the data suggested a 26.9% greater chance of contracting the flu or other respiratory virus for the vaccinated group. The conclusion presented is that influenza vaccination of working-age adults was associated with a higher risk of influenza during the 2024-2025 season, suggesting the vaccine did not have the intended protective effect. Speaker 1 adds commentary, noting that the Cleveland Clinic study admits they effectively coerced over 80% of their staff to get the flu shot, implying these individuals are not biased against the vaccine and would be expected to defend it. They argue this makes the bias the opposite of what some might assume and suggest that the study should prompt reconsideration of vaccination. Speaker 1 then pivots to an appeal: they encourage viewers to sign up for their email list at thehighwire.com or ICANN, promising to deliver the study and related evidence in their inbox. They urge viewers to take the Cleveland Clinic document to their doctor and ask, “Should I get this year's flu shot?” If the doctor says yes, Speaker 1 counsels firing the doctor and presenting the document as a reason, claiming doctors may be unaware of the study. They emphasize firing doctors who do not know the study and assert that this week they wish to see doctors fired across the country if they cannot defend the use of the vaccine in light of the study. Speaker 1 concludes with a personal admonition to avoid doctors who, in their view, are not making informed decisions about health and the future of children. Speaker 0 revisits the broader context, noting that a flu vaccine with low effectiveness is not surprising since strains are guessed before the season and production is ramped up accordingly. He references Canadian headlines about low or no protection this year, and remarks that negative efficacy, such as -26.9%, is particularly noteworthy.