TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

They are now pushing wearables on the population. And starting with external wearables and then going into internal wearables in the future, we do know as well Gates Foundation funded what's called microneedle patch implants that install quantum dots in skin for about five years to for use as vaccine passports. Again, this is on the National Library of Medicine website. So, yeah, the plan appears to be going from external wearables, get them to wear that, and then you go into the internal wearables, these implants.

Human brains could be linked to a network for remote control assassination and torture. Technology like injectable neural nets using Graphene raises concerns about potential human enslavement. Despite promises of medical benefits, the dual-use nature of this tech poses a threat. Recent events show a disregard for ethics and informed consent, hinting at a bleak future. The dystopian reality may be worse than imagined.

The transcript outlines major concerns about neuroscience and neuroweaponry, highlighting both technical advances and the risks they pose to privacy, security, and human autonomy. It begins with the potential to use nanoparticulate and aerosolizable nanomaterials as weapons that disrupt blood flow and neurological networks, and to deploy nanomaterials for implantable sensor arrays and real-time brain reading/writing without invasive surgery, as in DARPA’s N3D program (Next Generation Non-Invasive Neuromodulation). Advances in artificial intelligence are driving breakthroughs such as devices that can read minds and alter brain function to treat conditions like anxiety or Alzheimer's. This progress raises privacy concerns, leading to Colorado enacting a pioneering law that protects brain data as part of the state privacy act, analogous to fingerprints when used to identify people. The discussion notes that at-home devices, such as EarPods, can decode brainwave activity to determine whether someone is paying attention or their mind is wandering, and progress suggests it can already discriminate the types of attention (central tasks like programming vs. peripheral tasks like writing or online browsing). The narrative emphasizes that “the biggest question” is who has access to these technologies. It asserts that devices connected to AI can change, enhance, and even control thoughts, emotions, and memories. Brainwave patterns can be decrypted to convert thoughts to text, and patterns can reveal a person’s internal states. Lab-grade capabilities include reading brain activity from multiple regions and writing into the brain remotely, enabling high-resolution monitoring and intervention. The conversation underscores the sensitivity of brain data, with potential misuse by data insurers, law enforcement, and advertisers, and notes that private companies collecting brain data often do not disclose storage locations, retention periods, access controls, or security breach responses. A first-in-the-nation Privacy Act in Colorado is described as a foundational step, but more work remains. The discussion also covers the broader ecosystem: consumer devices, corporate investments by major tech companies (e.g., those that acquired brain-computer interface firms like Control Labs), and the emergence of ubiquitous monitoring through wearables and bossware in workplaces. There is concern about the ability to identify not just attention but specific tasks or intents, which raises questions about surveillance and control. Security and misuse are central themes. There are accounts of attempts to prime recognition signals (P300, N400) to reveal private data such as PINs without conscious processing. The possibility of hacking brain interfaces over Bluetooth is raised, along with debates about technologies that aim to write signals to the brain, potentially enabling manipulation or coercion. The potential for “Manchurian candidates” and covert manipulation is discussed, including examples of individuals who perceived voices or were influenced by harmful ideation. Finally, the transcript touches on geopolitical and ethical implications: rapid progress and heavy investment (notably by China) in neurotechnology, the risk that AI could be used to read thoughts and target individuals, and concerns about the broader aim of controlling narratives and people. There is acknowledgment of the difficulty in proving tampering with the brain and a warning about the dangerous, uncharted territory at the intersection of AI, neuroscience, and weaponization.

The program presents a narrative linking Havana syndrome, COVID-19 vaccination, and alleged pervasive nanotech-based surveillance and control technologies, framed by whistleblowers and investigators. Key claims and points: - Havana syndrome is described as real, with documented anomalous frequency phenomena. The guest, Jesse Beltran, an expert in anomalous frequency analysis and Havana syndrome-related phenomena, says the phenomenon expanded after the COVID vaccine rollout, with complaints “identical to what he was seeing with Havana syndrome” and suggests vaccines act as transmitters of signals. - A central premise is that signals can be received inside the body and sometimes appear to originate from external sources, including graves. A trailer scene allegedly shows signals coming from six feet underground in graves of people who took the shot and died, described as signals still being broadcast. - The documentary frames the COVID vaccines as containing or enabling signals and transceivers, with claims that biosensors and programmable nanotechnology are embedded in vaccines, lipid nanoparticles, and related substances, enabling data retrieval and data transmission from the human body. - The discussion covers biometric surveillance “into what’s under the skin,” with assertions that biometric data and location data are collected through these technologies, turning vaccine recipients into “routers” and “communication devices.” - The Bonnie Keller-B case is highlighted: a woman implanted with biosensors without consent, later surgically removed in some cases. Beltran cites these biosensors as evidence of nonconsensual implants, used to illustrate broader claims about experimentation on U.S. citizens without consent. - The 21st Century Cures Act (2016) is cited as enabling experimentation on U.S. citizens without consent under minimal risk criteria; the speakers claim Section 3024 was extended in 2024 to cover private entities and research institutions, with implications for consent and data sharing (including FOIA exemptions and national security protections). - Specific claims are made about nanotechnology being self-assembling, programmable, and able to cross the blood-brain barrier. A reference is made to patents and documents describing nanoscale biocompatible devices and their capabilities. - Doctor Hall (John Hall) is presented as an early whistleblower who linked signals to Havana syndrome as far back as 2010, with a history of using frequency detectors to identify anomalous signals. Hall’s work is said to have led to field scans and data collection from hundreds of individuals, revealing patterns in who is affected. - The frequency-detection methodology is described: two devices—an RF general frequency detector with precision to a fraction of a millimeter and a nonlinear junction detector—used to scan living subjects. The nonlinear junction detector is described as capable of locating silicon-based circuitry and biosensors in the body, sometimes leading to surgical removal. - The narrative asserts post-COVID increases in the number of detected signal locations per person (averaging around 20 locations or more), with comparisons across demographics and geography, including prisoners, soldiers, and general populations showing similar patterns. It is claimed that children can also test positive. - The speakers discuss broader implications: a new form of war using neurotechnology, six-g/AI integration, remote manipulation of thoughts, and potential erosion of human rights if these technologies are used for control. They cite potential military subcontractors and telecommunications companies as sources of the frequencies, and they reference a “brain initiative” and AI-assisted control as evidence of centralized command and control over individuals. - A recurring theme is the threat to free thought and autonomy, with warnings about a future where people could be deprived of basic rights or become “homo borgensis,” subject to memory imprinting or erasure via remote technologies, especially as six-G and advanced AI advance. - Practical takeaways offered include a supplement (zeolite Z) to reduce symptoms and excrete graphene oxide, and the Stop3024.com initiative seeking signatures against nonconsensual experimentation. The speakers urge independent research and present themselves as offering coaching and evidence gathering for those claiming to be affected. People and roles: - Jesse Beltran: TSCM-certified investigator, expert in Havana syndrome and anomalous frequency analysis; discusses detectors, biosensors, and post-vaccine signals; shares case histories and demonstrations. - Doctor John Hall: Referenced as a pioneer who documented hearing signals and health effects; linked to early Havana syndrome work and field data collection. - Bonnie Keller-B: Subject of biosensor implants; case cited to illustrate nonconsensual implants and surgical removal. - Speaker references include various researchers, whistleblowers, and advocates who describe legal, ethical, and technocratic concerns around biometric surveillance, nanoscale technologies, and government programs. Overall, the transcript presents a cohesive, if controversial, account connecting Havana syndrome, COVID vaccines, nanotech, biological monitors, and a trajectory toward pervasive biotechnological control, framed as a matter of urgent public disclosure and citizen action.

- Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the possibility that a friend was murdered and suggest that both victims died suddenly from fast-moving cancer, a method they say the agency uses overseas to eliminate people. Speaker 1 admits he cannot prove this but notes the sudden deaths. - The conversation asserts that the US government has technology to infect people with fast-moving cancer and to perform cognitive and directed-energy warfare. Speaker 0 states the government has the technology to infect with fast-moving cancer and to do so absolutely. - In 1997, Speaker 1 describes a hearing on asymmetric threats where he chaired the research committee and focused on four threats: drones, cyberattacks, electromagnetic pulse (EMP), and cognitive warfare. He asserts that cognitive warfare is now being labeled by some as Havana syndrome and that directed-energy weapons are the underlying technology. - Speaker 2 recounts a recent homeland security hearing about foreign adversaries using direct weapons against US citizens, enabling incapacitation. He emphasizes the chilling nature of the briefing and criticizes current domestic leadership as foolish, corrupt, incompetent, and wicked. - Speaker 3 notes that up to 40% of the Air Force equipment budget in the 1990s was classified, making much of it “black.” He emphasizes that military and security research often precedes civilian medical science, and that servicemen were used in experiments without fully informed consent, referencing NK Ultra-era disclosures of thousands of service members used as subjects. - Speaker 4 discusses MKUltra, describing a Canadian experiment involving psychic driving with massive LSD doses, eye-tracking, and memory loss, funded by MKUltra and affecting civilians. He mentions Project Midnight Climax, where Johns were observed in brothels while subjected to LSD, and notes similar experiments by the British Royal Air Force and Army. The results of Midnight Climax are unknown, with no published after-action reports. - Speaker 3 adds that Secretary of Energy O’Leary stated under Clinton that over a half a million Americans had been used in human experiments over four decades without informed consent, including mind control, with no accountability. He argues that mind-control technology has advanced, and questions who should govern its use, given the lack of legal frameworks. - The discussion covers mind-effects research and the lack of treaties governing such technologies. They reference a European Parliament security and disarmament resolution (1999) addressing mind-effects and mind-control technology, and Russian Duma resolutions (2002) seeking similar safeguards. Zabigniew Brzezinski’s Between Two Ages is cited regarding electronically stroking the ionosphere to influence behavior over geographic areas, connecting it to HARP and other electromagnetic carriers capable of mass or individual influence. - Speaker 6 explains historical demonstrations of electronic mind control, starting with Jose Delgado’s remote manipulation of a charging bull using radio energy and electrodes, and notes later work showing noninvasive techniques to influence behavior using low-power magnetic fields. Speaker 7 reiterates Delgado’s animal studies and the potential for noninvasive methods to affect emotions and memory, with broader implications for humans. - Speaker 3 discusses the progression of research funded by DARPA and others toward higher-resolution control of brain activity, enabling controlled effects that override senses and create synthetic memories, raising questions about future justice and evidence. They describe European Parliament and NATO/US military interest in mind-control technologies and the absence of robust legal protections. - Speaker 9 presents advances in AI-enabled brain-reading and memory-altering devices, including mind-reading and emotion decoding, while Speaker 10 and Speaker 12 discuss privacy concerns, brain-data privacy laws (Colorado’s law adding brain data to privacy protections), and the availability of consumer devices that decode brainwaves. They warn that brain data can be misused by insurers, law enforcement, advertisers, and governments, with private companies often sharing data without clear disclosure. - The segment concludes with a note that devices can infer attention and thoughts, and that DARPA’s N3D program aims for noninvasive neuromodulation with implantable electrodes read/write capabilities. It references 1980s–1990s discussions of RF energy as a potential nonlethal mind-control technology, and a 1993 Johns Hopkins conference listing low-frequency weapons as attractive options.

Google has recently hired a remarkable individual named Kurt Veil, who is involved in genetic manipulation and transhumanism. The goal of these endeavors is to merge humans with computers, allowing for brain uploads and computer downloads. NASA documents suggest that humans will become post-human, while other documents refer to them as useless eaters. The plan is for a small elite group to live comfortably while the majority of the population serves as slaves. These slaves will be manipulated to fulfill specific roles. However, this future generation will lack empathy due to their constant connection to technology, which the elites see as a positive aspect.

The speaker claims groups like the Trilateral Commission, created by Rockefeller, have been pushing a eugenicist agenda for a long time, and that Keir Starmer is a member. They believe these groups envision an upper and lower class becoming different species, with the lower class becoming mentally retarded and serving the super elite. The speaker asserts technologies framed as mental or genetic enhancement are dual use and can diminish as well as enhance. They state groups like DARPA and the Pentagon have heavily developed these technologies, not only as enhancers but also as weapons of war that can target people on a genetic level. The speaker concludes that "maniacs are in the driver's seat" and people need to take action.

DARPA foundries making their own molecules, peptides, amino chains. I was reading them, not comprehending. Is it transhumanism? regenerative medicine? In the second livestream, nanotechnology reproduces itself, grabs up the components of your body to do it, then after reproducing itself, creates its own neural networks, no different than your body does. It can give commands to itself, upgrading nodes and then creating its own AI internally on its own. "Every single one of you that thinks you need the five g, no. It's inside." Thus, "the foundries with DARPA ten years ago." Then: "PACS database, anybody with the DHS, the FBI, can click a button remotely." The speaker warns: "You jabbed people with nano that not only recreates itself, but makes its own neural nets and its own artificial intelligence that is specific to the human on the inside?" It's in the molecular communication routing. The talk warns this is about turning humans into something else, not arms into a fish flipper, referencing a 2020 military blog. "Our synergists know more, I think, I suspect, than your military does."

Nanobots made of Graphene oxide and hydrogel are being injected into our bodies, allowing us to become receivers and transmitters of signals. This technology, developed by DARPA, aims to control soldiers' minds by implanting them with Graphene Oxide. Scientific journals have documented this, and companies like brain neuroelectronics use Graphene Oxide to manipulate behavior through brain interface. This is the direction of transhumanism, which we must resist.

The speaker discusses the potential for controlling the human race through electromagnetic influence. They explain that any mental state can be artificially injected into the human brain from an external source, and this capability already exists on a global scale. They mention a paper by Doctor Persinger, published in 1995, which explores the possibility of accessing every human brain through electromagnetic induction. The speaker suggests that by identifying specific brain characteristics, one can access and modify a person's memory, consciousness, and sense of self. They compare this research to the work of doctors Ewan and Cameron, who aimed to shape the human race through more primitive means.

They argue that centralization—big pharma, the FCC, and other captured agencies—drives a problem that includes tech giants like Motorola, Nokia, Apple, Meta, and Google. They claim that programs government-sponsored at Tulane Neurosurgery and Neurology, known as MK Ultra, taught that people could be controlled through light waves. They describe a progression from cutting monkeys’ heads and wiring their heads to study behavior to the claim that we are controlled by light waves, not just by light in our environment. They point out that blue light is used by Dell, Apple, Meta, Google, and others on screens, and question why efflux or iris isn’t preloaded, suggesting the reason is that blue light lowers dopamine and melatonin, making people addicted. They attribute the discovery of this effect to the mafia rather than the CIA, linking it to the Las Vegas model: a desert city with great light and casinos that used blue light and alcohol to lower patrons’ dopamine so they would spend more money. They claim the CIA then redirected researchers to explore how to control without wires, moving from direct brain wires to semiconductors and LEDs through light. They recount that silicon valley developments with semiconductors produced LEDs, and that the early work included Delgado, a PhD researcher who implanted wires in a bull’s head to stop the animal via remote control, demonstrating a transition to wireless control. They assert that the next step was to eliminate wires and implant microchips in the brain, akin to Neuralink, enabling electrical, photoelectrical, and wireless control. They claim that researchers discovered that light could be used to control mammals, and that Meta and Google codified this through patents for blue light technology used in screens, owning the patents via patent attorneys. They reference Maria Manoulas in Los Angeles and her circle of friends connected to screens, asking whether these tools have been used to influence people and situations around them. They argue digital babysitting is successful for parents because a child becomes easier to control with screens, comparing this to a heroin addict needing a fix, explaining that exposure to electromagnetic pollution reduces beta endorphin (the natural brain opiate) and drives a need for external dopamine from drugs, alcohol, sex, or food. They claim this entire line of research originated in covert work at institutions such as Tulane, Johns Hopkins, Mayo Clinic, and Harvard, then moved into big tech. They explain the transition from old CRT screens to blue-lit modern screens, noting that those who own the patents control the algorithms and centralize medicine for profit. They suggest a cynical view of doctors: their burnout is tied to blue-lit electronic medical records like Epic, Cerner, and Meditech, which require data input rather than patient interaction. They ask who that serves and imply it harms both patients and doctors. They challenge the idea that technology saves money, asserting instead that it increases data collection and profit through big data. They warn that AI will be used to train computers to replace dermatologists, predicting that in twenty years people will visit Walgreens and consult AI-generated, Google-algorithm-created centralized medicine. They name Maria Manoulas and her circle as part of this ecosystem.

The speakers discuss the development of technology that could potentially allow for control over human minds. They mention the possibility of vaccines that can remotely update and change a person's DNA, as well as the ability to program cells to produce desired substances. This technology could be remotely controlled and have an impact on a person's thoughts and actions. The speakers express concern over the potential for complete control over humanity through these advancements.

In 2016, Klaus Schwab mentioned that by 2026, everyone would have a digital identifier. A U.S. patent exists for technology in vaccines that can measure biometric data and transmit it to third parties. Additionally, a Microsoft patent from 2020 links biometric data transmission to cryptocurrency. The question arises: how to convince 7 billion people to accept technology that tracks their biometric data? One theory suggests creating a bioweapon to instill fear, leading to isolation and a desperate need for a vaccine that contains this technology. This raises concerns about why children, with a 99.998% chance of recovery from COVID, would receive these injections if not for reasons beyond health.

Welcome Leap and the DARPA connection focus on mapping the brains of fetuses and children aged 3 months to 3 years. Their goal is to create a model of a developing child's brain and develop interventions to make all children cognitively homogeneous. Welcome Leap aims to subject 80% of kids to this program by 2030. The chief scientist of The Who, Jeremy Farrar, supports this program, which involves wearing brain mapping wearables and eye tracking technology from infancy. The Wellcome Trust, connected to the British Eugenic Society, has ties to Aldous Huxley's brother, who coined the term transhumanism. This raises concerns about the influence of eugenics and the lack of attention given to the Wellcome Trust's activities. The person in charge of these programs will have significant power over individuals' and children's bodies.

The transition from human 1.0 to human 2.0 involves transhumanism, merging humans with artificial intelligence. This raises concerns about the new COVID-19 vaccine, which is experimental and could potentially alter our DNA. The introduction of synthetic DNA and nanotechnology, like hydrogel, could allow for constant monitoring of our health and personal data, impacting privacy and autonomy. There are serious implications regarding who owns this data and how it could affect our behavior and memories. Additionally, the involvement of organizations like DARPA and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation raises questions about motivations, especially given their interests in population control and gene extinction technologies. With vaccine manufacturers having no liability for harm, the urgency behind the vaccine rollout warrants scrutiny. The potential for alternative treatments is being overlooked, suggesting ulterior motives behind the vaccine push.

All animals and humans have been implanted with Graphene Biochips for control and contact tracing. This includes connection to the Internet of humans and animals. The goal is to have complete control over the body and spirit. Despite the heavy topic, there is still hope to be found.

- Speaker 0 urges not to dismiss the discussion, noting that resurfaced CIA files and Epstein files have made certain topics more accepted. They say there was “transhumanism… engineering of humans potentially cloning,” which used to be dismissed as conspiracy theory but is now seen as real. They link these themes to those who rule over us, and observe that Epstein’s interests in vaccines and Bill Gates are echoed by figures like Musk, who say we need to be “one with the AI” and that perhaps everyone needs a brain chip. Speaker 0 claims Lisa and their research support this, and that the conversation is continuing. - Speaker 1 responds by affirming the importance of the point and recalling a deep past discussion about transhumanism. They describe it as a “very collective and very orchestrated plan of this evolution” that has been happening for centuries. They say it is an evolution by “a group of entities” or a “very high powered… influential group of individuals” who became an institution and decided that humanity needed to evolve. They ask who is deciding what an ordinary species is and what the mechanics and architectural blueprint are that advance that species, asserting that “we’re in that right now.” - Speaker 0 adds: “Right. We The people that are deciding what the advanced species needs to look like just so happen to all be friends with the pedophile by the looks of it.” - Speaker 1 concludes with “100%.”

The speaker outlines a chilling blueprint for global social control by exploiting humanity’s own psychology. It begins with detaching people from their inner love and identity, forcing them into a system that teaches it is wrong to be themselves if they differ from what is deemed normal. It proposes confusing individuals about their biological makeup so permanent body alteration becomes the presumed path to happiness, and mandating daily attendance at an institution that concentrates exclusively on provided information. Education would start at age five, continue into adulthood, and be punctuated by constant testing to make that information their truth. A strategy is described to suppress independent thought: offering explanations for everything so there is little room for personal interpretation, scolding and humiliating dissenters, and continually reminding people of past cruelties while broadcasting present cruelties to cultivate fear. The narrative suggests convincing people that humanity is inherently incognizant and wild, eroding their sense of purpose or belief in a creator. It claims to promote the illusion that humans are as intelligent as ever, preventing scrutiny of the system’s integrity. The plan includes elevating artificial ideals of beauty and stealthily shaping desires through idols to prevent contentment with one’s appearance, prompting constant self-comparison. It envisions the creation of addictive digital platforms that rank individuals by follower counts, so self-worth hinges on numeric validation. Society would be organized so that money determines status and opportunity, with a built-in mechanism to favor those with wealth over those without. Economic and daily life controls are described: money would be the main focus, but accumulation would be so difficult that people remain in perpetual struggle, locking them into the system. Taxation would be pervasive, justified as for their own benefit, and time would be drained through continuous labor. People would have only two days of respite to feel rewarded, yet even these breaks would not alleviate systemic control. Poisonous consumption would be promoted in social settings so that, even on their two days off, people remain disconnected from themselves and others. The speaker also describes medical control: food would be pumped with excess sugars and addictive chemicals, making health problems cheap and ubiquitous, while medications would mask symptoms and create dependence. Healthcare would be expensive, anchoring a cycle of consumption, medication, and work. Finally, chaos would be manufactured and blamed on a group of their own, generating widespread judgmental stereotypes and turning people against one another in numerous ways.

Welcome Leap and the DARPA connection focus on mapping the brains of fetuses and children aged 3 months to 3 years. Their goal is to create a virtual model of a developing child's brain and develop interventions to make all children cognitively homogeneous. Welcome Leap aims to subject 80% of kids to this program by 2030. The chief scientist of The Who, Jeremy Farrar, supports this ambitious program, which involves children wearing brain mapping wearables and eye tracking technology. The Wellcome Trust, which has ties to the British Eugenic Society, is heavily involved in this initiative. The influence of individuals like Julian Huxley, who coined the term transhumanism, and their involvement in major medical research organizations like the Wellcome Trust raises concerns about the consequences of these programs. The person in charge of these programs will have significant power over individuals' and children's bodies.

Nanobots made of Graphene oxide and hydrogel are being injected into our bodies, allowing us to become receivers and transmitters of external signals. This technology, developed by DARPA, aims to control soldiers' minds by implanting them with Graphene Oxide. Scientific journals have documented this, and companies like brain neuroelectronics use Graphene Oxide to manipulate behavior by interfacing with the brain. This is the path towards transhumanism, which we must resist.

On March 16, 2018, DARPA announced an initiative to develop human-machine interfaces that connect the brain directly to external systems. This technology could enable users to control devices like drones through thought alone. While promising for civilian and military applications, concerns arise about potential misuse for mind control. DARPA has a history of exploring how machines can influence the brain, including past projects like Project Pandora, which investigated microwave radiation's effects on behavior. Current advancements may allow for remote control of human actions, raising ethical questions. Additionally, gene editing technologies like CRISPR could modify brain cells, paving the way for more permanent forms of mind control. The development of such technologies necessitates a collaborative approach between creators and ethicists to address potential implications.

DARPA announces a new initiative called next generation non-surgical neurotechnology, aiming to create direct brain interfaces. DARPA has a history of developing influential technologies like the Internet and self-driving cars. The new technology could involve sensors on the head or implanted in the brain, allowing direct interaction with communication, processing, and weapon systems. This could enable remote control of robots and drones by simply thinking. These machine interfaces have potential applications in both civilian and military settings. However, some people worry that DARPA could potentially use this technology for mind control, similar to the concerns surrounding the CIA.

Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook, claims that in the future, users will be able to share their thoughts and feelings telepathically through the platform. He encourages people to think beyond national boundaries and embrace a global community. Some view this as a move towards a corporate global system, reminiscent of the movie "Network" where there are no countries, only companies. The World Economic Forum (WEF) has also released a video discussing brain transparency and the potential for tracking brainwave data. This raises concerns about the invasion of privacy and the control that powerful entities may have over individuals. The article mentions a law passed in 2016 that legalized the National Brain Condition Surveillance System, allowing for the monitoring of neurological conditions.

Speaker 0: I think what a lot of people aren't really familiar with is the bioengineering aspect of this, and we only need to look to this recently published headline from the Daily Mail, which was resurfaced, declassified CIA files that revealed a chilling blueprint to manipulate Americans' minds through covert drugging with vaccines. And it's not just vaccines that was in that blueprint. It's also the food, the water supply, pretty much altering our state of mind and our biology through all of these methods. And this is going back all the way to the fifties. One can only imagine how far they've come now, but you've been digging into this, and you have a bit of an idea as to how far they've come. To us about your latest research. Speaker 1: So you're absolutely right. And this has been, you know, a slow progression. Nothing is just being, you know, introduced new. I mean, it the technology has advanced, but it's been going on for decades decades, hundreds of years. And when you think about pharmaceuticals, the the apparatus of pharmaceuticals, they are all they it is medicinal chemistry, which is synthetic materials, synthetic biology, engineered bacteria, yeasts, molds, and all of those things like you just said. We have we are being assaulted with these these materials, which are now considered devices, you know, with the manipulated EMF and frequencies. And all of those are to exactly what you just said, weaken the system. And really this pro this slow progression of a we're in the midst of a forced evolution to become providers of a synthetic material, hybrid synthetic material. So we'll continue to produce as we do because the humanity's biological systems are by design meant to thrive and recycle and and repurpose themselves, but to survive. And so we accept these synthetic materials, and we and our body slowly begin to make accommodations to those mutations, natural mutations, but also so much of these so much of the synthetic material is coded to go in and trigger a mutation or to forcibly cause a mutation. So we literally are walking around. I mean, all of us, and it goes from the tiny little mushroom that's growing in the woods to, you know, aquatic life to every single biological electrical system, the nervous system, you know, is based on frequency. It's based on electricity. And so that is that's what's being attacked is the nervous system and the immune systems of every living being. Speaker 0: Now you're talking about some very important things here, Lisa. You've sent me this article from Medium titled the synthetic nervous system, a blueprint for physical AI. And in this article, it talks about how for the past decade, AI has lived primarily in a box, but now, our, you know, our interaction with AI has been linguistic and digital. We've cracked the code apparently, completely on generative AI, unlocking the ability to, listen to this, manipulate symbols, pixels, and code at scale, but we're now entering a far more complex epoch, the era of physical AI. And they are talking about the transition from AI that thinks to AI that acts. So they're saying the intelligence behind humanoid robots. They also give, you know, autonomous systems and things of this nature. My concern is that their plan stated goal is that they want humans to integrate with AI. This is something that even Elon Musk itself has said we need to do in order to stay relevant. And your research shows that they're already in the process of doing that. Talk to us a little bit about that. Speaker 1: Yes. And probably have. We and and, you know, I think that life as we know it will fairly stay the same because what the integration is through, and you've heard of this, is the digital twin. You know, assigning each of us a representative in the AI ecosystem, ecosystem, which which is is a a digital twin. But that digital twin is able to function and, perform because it is it is based off of your data, your biological data, your, that they are going in and removing and stealing through the infiltrators and facilitators that is vaccines, bioengineered foods, bioengineered bacteria. The, you know, the pharmaceutical industry is the perfect setup, and it's only one of one setup that goes in, and now these are all synthetic material devices. They work off of Wi Fi. They're software platforms, and they are all digital. And they are being monitored by the Department of Energy, HHS, MITRE now, these private companies and private oligarch, you know, tech companies that all have access to our free our our inner, you know, biological data DNA and and everything. And so that the AI platform, in order for it to succeed and for its longevity, there has to be a cohesive connection between humanity because we are the fuel that is going to feed that AI ecosystem. And it cannot it it's not gonna be one or the other. It has to work cohesively, and and they have to be joined. And how the the joining of those literally is through an infiltration system, which is primarily vaccines and engineered pathogens.