reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 asserts that packaged DNA fragments have been found en masse as vaccine contaminants. Once they reach the nucleus, short DNA sequences have an increased propensity to insert into chromosomal DNA. The possible consequences are unending, including disruption of the exquisitely tuned network that controls cell division and differentiation, which can lead to cancer and developmental defects. Mutations in sperm and fertilized egg cells could render altered traits inheritable. Speaker 0 further states that cost effective procedures to reliably separate mass produced RNA from plasmids do not exist, and therefore contamination of RNA vaccines with plasmid DNA must be expected to be the rule and not the exception. Whoever propagates RNA vaccines as being safe and effective, whoever claims that nothing can happen to your genome is either incredibly ignorant or endlessly evil. That person is turning his back on the horror scenario that is unfolding in front of our very eyes. Fellow citizens and physicians of the world are urged to turn away from the perpetrators of this monstrous crime against humanity. Speaker 0 concludes with admonitions to do this to save yourself, your descendants, and to rescue the name of your family or go down in history as one of the greatest criminals of all time. Speaker 1 responds: Thank you very much, professor Bhakti. You continue to be an inspiration both scientifically and ethically for all of us.

Quan et al demonstrated that the introduction of DNA into a cell, even without integration, can trigger the oncogenic cGAS-STING pathway. The speaker claims that the presence of an SV40 origin of replication, a mammalian origin, in a vaccine grown in E. coli is reckless because it allows the plasmid DNA to replicate episomally in the host. The speaker alleges evidence suggests Pfizer, unlike Moderna, may have included this origin of replication due to carelessness. The speaker highlights concerns about nucleic acid persistence, noting that RT-PCR methods used in studies like Krausson and Rolchen may have amplified both DNA and RNA. The speaker suggests that prior studies assumed detected nucleic acids were RNA, but that further investigation using primers specific to the plasmid backbone might reveal the presence of residual plasmid DNA. The Krausson paper found nucleic acids present for thirty days in heart tissues, and the Rolchen paper found them for sixty days.

"Packaged DNA fragments have been found en masse as vaccine contaminants." "Once they reach the nucleus, short DNA sequences have an increased propensity to insert into chromosomal DNA." "The possible consequences are unending." "Disruption of the exquisitely tuned network that controls cell division and differentiation can lead to cancer and to developmental defects." "Mutations in sperm and fertilized egg cells could render altered traits inheritable." "Cost effective procedures to reliably separate mass produced RNA from plasmids do not exist." "Contamination of RNA vaccines with plasmid DNA must therefore be expected to be the rule and not the exception." "Whoever propagates RNA vaccines as being safe and effective, whoever claims that nothing can happen to your genome, is either incredibly ignorant or endlessly evil."

They tested many vials and found DNA in all of them, with “a lot of DNA” in all the vials and above alleged EMA limits. The claim is that these limits rely on “naked DNA” assessments rather than assessments for slip and nanoparticle encapsulated DNA. One DNA fragment identified is the “SV40 promoter enhancer,” described as a strong mammalian promoter. The speaker says that the presence of SV40 promoter enhancer, along with other DNA fragments, can induce problems that “basically all lead to cancer.” The speaker explains they considered gene mutations and looked for reports of specific gene mutations related to the situation. They say they expected to find nothing but did not find nothing. They also state they are not asserting a causal link, but are seeking evidence to generate hypotheses. They describe how SV40 in particular can cause genomic instability, insertions can occur, and gene defects could be anticipated when inserting cells with billions of fragments of foreign DNA. They also mention potential for epigenetic modifications, referring to methylation patterns discussed by Kevin in a preprint. The speaker’s bottom line is that there are questions “everybody kind of needs to answer,” and they direct viewers to read their Substack for those questions.

Speaker 0 argues that because it’s classified as a vaccine, they don’t have to worry about being sued. Speaker 1 counters that there is immunity from liability dependent on there having been no fraud, and asserts that there clearly was fraud, so in light of that... Speaker 0 expresses surprise at known caveats to liability. Speaker 1 confirms the caveats and says it makes the situation more interesting. Speaker 0 asks how fraud is defined in this context, noting that drugs were sold with many studies but only one was good. Speaker 1 responds, “Let's try this one,” and discusses safety testing: the insufficient amount of safety testing before release was done with mRNA vaccines produced in a process that did not involve DNA. The product injected into billions of people involved DNA plasmids, with massive contamination in the shots actually delivered, including the SV40 promoter (simian virus 40). The point is that safety testing was performed on one process, but people were injected with something different that had other components not tested, which Speaker 1 calls fraudulent. Speaker 0 asks for an explanation of the SV40 issue. Speaker 1 explains production methods: techniques to generate product using a plasmid, a circular piece of DNA, allowing vats to grow the product before coating in lipid nanoparticle, with bacteria doing the work. There is a requirement to purify DNA and set standards for residual DNA contamination. In this case, not only was quality control poor, but there was a much more painstaking way to produce the same product that did not involve DNA plasmids at all. As a result, vials given to Kevin McKernan, containing material actually injected into people, showed DNA contamination across the board. Speaker 1 states that leftover DNA includes the SV40 promoter, a genetic trigger from simian virus 40, which is carcinogenic. This promoter is left over in vials from shots actually injected into people, implying that the claims about the potential for mRNA shots to integrate into the genome were incorrect. Speaker 1 asserts that there is DNA in the vials, not just some old DNA, and that it includes the SV40 promoter, a genetic engineering tool with carcinogenic potential. Therefore, Speaker 1 concludes, this seems to be clear fraud: you can’t inject a different product into the public on the basis of safety testing conducted with a product produced by a different process.

Moderna holds a patent for using RNA in vaccines, acknowledging that RNA is superior to DNA due to concerns about DNA-related problems like insertional immunogenesis and genotoxicity. The FDA claims to be unaware of any issues, but Moderna's own patent raises the same concerns about DNA. It appears that DNA is present in the RNA preparation as a contaminant, as it is used in the process of making RNA. Recent findings by scientists revealed large numbers of DNA fragments in the RNA preparation, including sequences that are not normally allowed in human use, such as an antibiotic resistance gene and sequences from simian virus 40. These DNA fragments can potentially lead to DNA damage, birth defects, and cancer.

The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines contain fragments of DNA, which can integrate into the genomic DNA of cells and become a permanent part of the cell. This poses a potential risk of autoimmune attacks and future cancer. The DNA contamination occurred during the production process, where a plasmid vector was used to scale up the production of the RNA template. The regulatory threshold for DNA in vaccines is outdated and not suitable for this new type of vaccine. The speaker believes that DNA sequencing should be done on vaccinated individuals' stem cells to determine if this theoretical risk has occurred. Informed consent is necessary, and the lack of transparency regarding the DNA contamination is concerning.

Moderna holds a patent for using RNA in vaccines, acknowledging that RNA is better than DNA due to concerns about DNA-related problems like insertional immunogenesis and genotoxicity. The FDA claims to be unaware of these concerns, but Moderna's own patent highlights them. The presence of DNA in the vaccines is considered a contaminant, as it is used in the process of making RNA. Recent findings by scientists in the US and Canada revealed large amounts of DNA fragments in the RNA preparation, including sequences not allowed for human use, such as an antibiotic resistance gene and sequences from simian virus 40. These DNA fragments pose risks of DNA damage, including birth defects and cancer.

When COVID-19 vaccines were sequenced, commercial annotation software highlighted functional parts of the plasmids, including antibiotic resistance genes and SV40 components. The speaker claims that Pfizer had to manually remove these annotations before submitting the plasmid map to regulators. According to the speaker, regulators received the DNA sequence, but the sponsor is obligated to annotate every open reading frame and promoter, even if their function is unknown. The speaker alleges that Pfizer intentionally removed annotations, hiding them from the FDA, which the speaker believes is a violation of guidelines. The speaker suggests the reason for hiding SV40 components is due to SV40 virus contamination in polio vaccines and its debated link to cancer. The speaker asserts that while epidemiological data is confounded by vaccine shedding, laboratory studies show SV40 is a potent oncogenic virus. The speaker claims that the vaccines contain some of the more carcinogenic components of that virus, and that these sequences are functional and have consequences.

Many labs, including Medicinal Genomics, found DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines. Regulators like the FDA and EMA admitted to this, but downplayed its significance. The SP 40 sequences omitted by Pfizer are crucial. DNA contamination can cause insertional mutagenesis, as stated in Moderna's patents. Regulatory agencies were deceived and failed to properly address the issue. This poses a serious risk that cannot be ignored.

The speaker discusses the issue of DNA contamination in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and questions the FDA's handling of the situation. They explain that normally rigorous tests are required to ensure safety, but in this case, the FDA ignored those tests. The speaker also mentions that Moderna's own patent acknowledges concerns about DNA and insertional immunogenesis. They reveal that DNA fragments, including an antibiotic resistance gene and sequences from simian virus 40, were found in the vaccines. The speaker expresses shock at the FDA's lack of transparency and highlights the potential risks associated with DNA damage, such as cancer and birth defects.

- The mRNA on plasmids was produced, and after processing, much DNA from plasmids remained; Kevin MacKinnon found that vials were full of plasmid DNA, the whole plasmid and parts of it, and this was published. Authorities claimed it doesn’t matter and that vaccines have saved millions of lives, so why not have some DNA in them. - The DNA in the vaccine vials was packaged in lipid nanoparticles and was shown by colleagues last year (the INMODIA publication) to enter human cells in culture and remain stable in cells for days, as did the mRNA. Despite this, the message given was to poof, never mind, don’t worry, be happy. - A radical change occurred due to a discovery by Kevin MacKinnon three weeks ago: during transcription on the chromosome, byproducts are generated; some mRNA strands do not detach from the DNA where they’re formed, creating hybrids of DNA and RNA that come off together. These hybrids are dangerous. - In cells, an enzyme called RNase H takes care of these sparks and extinguishes them immediately; otherwise they can cause damage to the chromosome, potentially lighting “fires” on the chromosomes. If not extinguished, the fires can cause diverse damage depending on where they occur, potentially leading to illnesses described in medical textbooks, including tumors (neoplastic disease), autoimmune disease, developmental impairment, birth defects, or death. - The speaker asserts these hybrids and their mishandling could lead to a broad range of illnesses, and emphasizes that this situation is not limited to the COVID vaccine but applies to all Moderna RNA vaccines, including new Moderna RNA vaccines entering the market, such as a flu vaccine, and mentions veterinary RNA vaccines as well. - The claim is made that these vaccines will be heavily contaminated with deadly dangerous hybrids, and it is the duty of authorities and controlling authorities to stop proceeding and not turn away; otherwise they will face court for not fulfilling their duties. The speaker has been giving interviews and asserts this narrative is spreading worldwide, framing it as akin to attempted murder and urging physicians to refuse vaccination.

Moderna's patents acknowledge that DNA integration is a risk, necessitating the invention of new methods to remove DNA. According to the speaker, Moderna is approximately tenfold more effective than Pfizer at removing DNA. The speaker claims that the manufacturers' patents indicate that the vaccines pose an oncogenic risk. The speaker suggests that one need not consult external papers to recognize this risk, as it is evident from the manufacturers' own patents.

I'm Philippe Boucalt, a cancer genomics researcher at the University of South Carolina. I've sequenced the DNA in the Pfizer vaccine and found that it contains fragments of DNA. This DNA could potentially cause rare but serious side effects, such as cardiac arrest and future cancer risks. The regulatory process that allowed this contamination is concerning. The DNA could integrate into long-lived somatic cells and potentially cause autoimmune attacks or disrupt tumor suppressors. To produce the vaccine, they cloned the PCR product into a plasmid vector, which led to the contamination. We can easily measure the amount of this substance in the vaccine and should conduct further studies to understand its implications. The FDA should require Pfizer to remove the DNA from the vaccine.

Key points: "the vials that were in fact approved are not the vials that were given to the public." The clinical trial used "process one that used PCR to make the DNA that was going to then turn into the RNA to make the spike protein." After the trial, "they switched" to a production process that "manufactured this DNA in E. Coli," introducing endotoxin risk. "There are these plasmids that have additional DNA that were not present in the actual clinical trial." Sequencing found mixtures, including "expired" and samples that had "been tapped into." Regarding Pfizer, "the Pfizer vaccines actually had a component that was not disclosed to the regulators." "The plasmid map on the right is what was disclosed to the EMA" with "no mention of the SV40 components" now "inside this DNA sequence." "The plasma on the left is what we actually found," with components not disclosed to regulators nor to patients. Monovalent Pfizer; prior ones were the bivalent vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer.

Speaker 0: They argue that because the vaccine is classified as such, they don’t have to worry about being sued. They claim immunity from liability is dependent on there being no fraud, and there clearly was fraud. Speaker 1: They say there is fraud. They note that immunity from liability depends on fraud, and in light of that, it matters. They explain that there was fraud. Speaker 0: Expresses surprise and asks for caveats about fraud. Acknowledges there were caveats. Speaker 1: Confirms there is fraud and says it makes the situation more interesting. Speaker 0: Asks how fraud is defined, noting that drugs were sold with multiple studies and only one was good. Speaker 1: Responds with a point about safety testing for the mRNA vaccines. States that the insufficient safety testing was done before release, and that the product injected into billions of people involved DNA plasmids. There is massive contamination in the shots actually delivered, including the SV40 promoter from simian virus 40. The point is that safety testing for one drug was completed, but people were injected with something different that had other components that were not tested, which is described as fraudulent. Speaker 0: Requests an explanation of the SV40 issue for the audience. Speaker 1: Describes production techniques used to generate the product. Explains that a plasmid, a circular piece of DNA, was used to produce the product in vats, with bacteria performing the production, later coated in lipid nanoparticle. There is a requirement to purify DNA and set standards for DNA contamination, with limits that cannot be exceeded. In this case, the problem isn’t only poor quality control but that there was a more painstaking way to produce the same product that did not involve DNA plasmids at all. Consequently, leftover material in vials injected into people contained DNA contamination across the board. Kevin McKernan tested vials, finding DNA contamination in the samples. Speaker 1: Explains that the DNA left over includes the SV40 promoter, a genetic trigger from simian virus 40, which is known to be carcinogenic. Since this promoter is left in the vials from injections given to people, it challenges the claim that the mRNA shots could not integrate into the genome. While acknowledging that there are cellular processes such as reverse transcription, the speaker asserts that even the claim of “no DNA” is false because there is DNA in the vials, specifically DNA with the SV40 promoter, a genetic engineering tool with carcinogenic potential. The speaker concludes that this appears to be fraud: injecting a different product into the public on the basis of safety testing that was conducted with a product produced by a different process. Speaker 0: Reiterates the conclusion: you can’t inject a different product into the public on the basis of safety testing that was done with something produced by a different process.

"Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA. It's not just mRNA." "This DNA is the DNA vector that was used as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction when they made the mRNA." "I sequenced it in my own lab." "The vials of Pfizer vaccine that were given out here in Colombia, one of my colleagues was in charge of that vaccination program in the College of Pharmacy." "And for reasons that I still don't understand, he kept every single vial." "So he had a whole freezer full of the empty vials." "And I checked these two batches, and I checked them by sequencing." "It's surprising that there's any DNA in there." "This DNA, in my view, it could be causing some of the rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest."

The speaker discusses the issue of DNA contamination in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and questions the FDA's handling of the situation. They explain that normally rigorous tests are required for genotoxicity and immunogenesis, but the FDA seemed to ignore these requirements. The speaker also mentions that Moderna's own patent acknowledges the concerns related to DNA and insertional immunogenesis. They reveal that DNA fragments, including an antibiotic resistance gene and sequences from simian virus 40, were found in the vaccines. The speaker expresses concern about the potential risks associated with DNA damage, such as cancer and birth defects. They criticize the FDA for downplaying the issue and emphasize the importance of transparency.

The Pfizer vaccine contains not only mRNA but also plasma DNA from the vector used in its production. I sequenced samples from two batches of the vaccine in Colombia and found this DNA, which raises concerns about potential health risks. This DNA could integrate into the genomic DNA of cells, leading to permanent changes. Such integration poses theoretical risks, including autoimmune responses and cancer, depending on where the DNA inserts itself in the genome. While these risks may be rare, they warrant investigation to understand their implications better.

Pfizer and Moderna vaccines use two processes. The first process involves using PCR to amplify and create DNA for clinical trials. Once approved, they use circular bacterial DNA plasmid to replicate billions of mRNA DNA sample copies. However, this resulted in contaminated vaccines with junk DNA. A study found DNA fragments in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines in Ontario, Canada. Researchers tested 27 mRNA vials from 12 different lots and discovered billions to 100 billions of DNA molecules per dose, exceeding FDA and WHO guidelines by 188 to 509 times. This is a significant amount, far beyond what is acceptable.

Kevin discovered that the vials used for vaccines are contaminated with bacterial DNA. This is concerning because the modified RNA used in these vaccines creates unusual genetic structures that don't occur naturally. Normally, DNA is in a double helix form, but with modified RNA, there are three strands attached to the DNA. The enzyme used to remove DNA, called DNase, cannot digest these triple-stranded genetic constructs, resulting in DNA contamination in the shots. Pfizer and Moderna should have addressed this issue during the manufacturing process by using different enzymes. This shows that assumptions cannot be made when working with new, unnatural products. The DNA used to manufacture the modified RNA was not properly removed, leading to multiple scary aspects of contamination.

The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA, not just mRNA. This DNA is the DNA vector used as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction. This was discovered by sequencing vials of Pfizer vaccine from Colombia. It's surprising that there's any DNA in there. The speaker is alarmed about the possible consequences of this, including rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. Mixing DNA with a lipid complex allows it to enter cells and become a permanent fixture. This is a real hazard for genome modification of long-lived somatic cells, like stem cells, and could cause a sustained autoimmune attack. There is also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people. The risk is not zero and it may be high enough that we ought to figure out if this is happening or not.

The Pfizer vaccine contains DNA contamination in addition to mRNA. The DNA comes from the DNA vector used as a template for making the mRNA. Sequencing analysis of the vaccine revealed the presence of DNA, which could potentially cause serious side effects and integrate into the genomic DNA of cells. This poses risks such as autoimmune attacks and potential future cancer. The DNA contamination likely occurred during the production process. It is important to investigate if this DNA has integrated into the genomes of vaccinated individuals. The FDA should require Pfizer to remove the DNA from future versions of the vaccine. The regulatory limit for DNA in vaccines is outdated and not suitable for this type of vaccine. It is necessary to address this oversight and ensure the safety of the vaccine.

RNA sequencing of the Moderna vaccine's three prime ends suggests a possible mechanism for RNA persistence: in vivo re-adenylation. The data indicates plasmid DNA contamination despite efforts to reduce it. The data also reveals contamination from other mRNA vaccines in Moderna's pipeline. The speaker suggests that with widespread DNA sequencing capabilities, tolerating incorrect RNA sizes in vaccines is irresponsible. Sequencing before approval would have allowed for a better understanding of low RNA scores before global administration.

Kevin discovered that the vials used for vaccines are contaminated with bacterial DNA. This is concerning because the modified RNA used in these vaccines creates unusual genetic structures that don't occur naturally. Normally, DNA is in a double helix form, but with modified RNA, it forms triple strands that can't be easily removed with DNase. This contamination is a result of corners being cut during the manufacturing process. Enzymes that could have eliminated the DNA were not used. This shows that assumptions cannot be made when working with new, unnatural products. The DNA contamination comes from using it to manufacture the modified RNAs.