reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 asked about a report and how concerning it is, questioning whether “10” is the real number. Speaker 1 said the main concern is that the report “dramatically understates the problem.” They argued that analyses rely on doctors and that it was difficult to obtain autopsies during the pandemic. Speaker 1 stated that medical professors did not want to know, resulting in very few autopsies. They said NIH, CDC, and FDA reviewed 96 autopsies of children and identified about 10 cases they considered possible or probable. Speaker 1 then pointed to VAERS, stating there are almost 1.7 million total adverse events and 39,000 deaths worldwide. They said that of the 39,000 deaths, 24% occurred on the day of vaccination or within one or two days. They acknowledged FDA officials say VAERS does not prove causation, but said that if someone was perfectly healthy and died on that day or within one or two days, they would assign blame. Speaker 1 also said there may be cases where people were already in bad health and vaccination “tipped them over,” with death ultimately caused by something else. Speaker 1’s “bigger revelation” was described as information they said was not covered by mainstream media. They stated that on 03/01/2021, Peter Marks, head of CBR within FDA, was briefed that their algorithm analyzing VAERS safety would hide and mask safety signals. Speaker 1 said that 26 days later, Marks ran a new algorithm that unmasked 49 cases of extreme masking and 25 safety signals, including sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, Bell’s palsy, and different types of strokes. Speaker 1 said that in the next three months, similar data runs with the new algorithm showed more safety signals and more types of sudden death. They said the report described not “pin[ning] a badge” on doctor Anna Scharzman (identified as the dad of Speaker 1’s expert), ordering her to cease and desist, and continuing to use the algorithm the briefing warned would hide safety signals “to this day.” Speaker 1 said Peter Marks later went to work for Eli Lilly and claimed that the world is in denial. They stated they could not get the story broadcast or interviews on CBS, ABC, NBC, PBS, MS Now, or CNN, and said they challenged Jake Tapper, sending the report and requesting an additional appearance.

- The speakers discuss data on vaccination, noting that “月 15 日 な ん と 1 800 万 人 の 接 種 回 数 人 数 分 の デー タ が 蓄 積 さ れ て お り ま す” – roughly, a large accumulation of data on vaccination counts (about 18 million vaccination events). - Speaker 1 attempts to compare vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. They say the unvaccinated “は 山 ま 行 け な っ いう は 特 に 当たり 前 な ん ですよね 。 打っ て も 別 に 殴ら れ る わけ じゃ な 打っ て い ま せ ん の で 、何 の 問 題 も なく 、 フラ ット に な る わけ です 。” In other words, the unvaccinated are described as obviously not having issues even if they are not vaccinated, while vaccinated people may become “flat” or experience issues. - The main focus is on the vaccinated group. They describe a “緑 の 裏” that starts low, with a peak over one to two weeks. They note a pattern beginning around two months, with large peaks around three to four months. They interpret this as possibly reflecting a reaction pattern in doctors, who after vaccination might observe effects on the day, the next day, or about a week later, suggesting a vaccine effect or adverse response that diminishes over time. - There is mention of sending information to PM DA (a recipient or channel for information), indicating that the information is being transmitted to PM DA as part of the data flow. - Another finding is that as vaccination numbers increase, the “山” (the peak) of the adverse or death-related data shifts to the earlier positions, described as moving “前の方、左 の 方 に 移 動 し て い る.” The implication is that the distribution of the peak shifts with increasing vaccination counts. - Speaker 1 then asserts that “接 種 回 数 が 増 え て い く と 、死 亡 者 の 山 の 湿 原 が 早 く なり ます。” meaning that as vaccination numbers rise, the peak of fatalities or deaths “湿 原” becomes earlier, i.e., happens sooner. - They conclude that if there were no toxicity or lipid adjuvant effects from vaccination, the peak would not occur. This is presented as a finding: “ワクチン 接 種 に 毒 性 だ と か 脂 肪 を 誘 導 する 効 果 が なけれ ば 、山 に まず な ら な い わけ です よ .” In short, the absence of toxicity or adjuvant effects would mean the peak wouldn’t appear. - The overall takeaways emphasize observed patterns: the vaccinated group shows a rising and shifting peak over time with increasing vaccination counts, and there is a suggestion that the vaccination might be associated with a pattern of adverse observations that intensify or appear earlier as more people are vaccinated.

The presentation examines the pattern of deployment of toxic vaccine batches using the VAERS dataset. It notes that the Covid vaccine was deployed in batches or lots, each with a number, and the batches are listed in VAERS in the order they were created, with adverse reactions recorded for each batch. A graph was produced with adverse reactions on the vertical axis and the sequence of batches in time on the horizontal axis, showing patterns of deployment in 2021. Each dot represents a batch, and the speaker highlights that about 95% of batches lie close to the x-axis, forming a thick line, with 80% of all batches generating only one or two adverse reaction reports and thus considered harmless. In contrast, the “clouds” and spikes above the x-axis represent toxic batches, with all such dots categorized as toxic. The breakdown given is: - 5% of all batches belong to these clouds and spikes. - The truly toxic batches generate 1,000 to 5,000 adverse reaction reports and are found above a red line, causing harm across every state in the USA where deployed. - These very toxic batches comprise about 0.65% of all batches (roughly one in 200). Total batches deployed in 2021 and recorded in VAERS: 28,330. Eighty percent are harmless (1–2 reports) within the x-axis line; the remaining 20% are more toxic, with the most extreme range up to 5,000 reports. Lesson two asks: “Who did it?” It identifies three companies appearing in VAERS: Moderna, Pfizer, and Janssen (Johnson & Johnson). By filtering VAERS data in Excel, the speaker presents the contributions of each company to the toxic-batch deployment. In the full picture, Moderna accounts for every batch in the first half of the chart except two spikes pre- and post- Moderna, which are attributed to Janssen. Pfizer’s results (from their batches) match the latter half of the chart exactly, suggesting Pfizer appeared to have taken over supply for every USA batch in the latter portion. The deployment is described as carefully compartmentalized, with phases where Janssen, then Moderna, then Janssen again, and then Pfizer dominate in sequence, followed by Moderna exiting and Pfizer continuing. Lesson three describes the purpose behind Moderna’s deployment of toxic batches: Moderna appears to randomly distribute toxic batches, with the intention of harm, possibly to induce fear of a pandemic and justify stronger policies. Janssen’s initial spike is interpreted as a test before Moderna’s deployment. Pfizer is described as carrying out rigorous dosage testing, deploying the most lethal batches systematically and recording effects, and acting as the only company administering batches at that stage to avoid interference from others. Lesson four details the fine art of lethal dosage testing. Pfizer’s deployment is shown as highly clustered in time, forming distinct periods of toxic batches separated by intervals of harmless batches. Toxic batches cluster in discrete ranges (e.g., 3,000–2,500; 2,000–1,500; 1,500–1,000), with abrupt transitions between clusters and harmless periods. Toxicity ranges are not random but follow a stepwise, linear decline across clusters. The speaker concludes that Pfizer deployed highly toxic batches for discrete dosage testing across all states, implying thousands of hospitalizations, injuries, and deaths. The presentation ends by contrasting that 80% of batches are harmless, while a minority exhibit wide toxicity ranges, with claims of systematic, non-random deployment designed for testing, and notes an ironic statement about American exposure to what is described as German-led testing.

The speaker describes a nationwide study conducted in South Korea, stating that every resident was included in the research. The study compared individuals who received the vaccine to those who did not, and the analysis was stratified by dose number (one dose, two doses, three doses, and four or more doses). A central claim of the speaker is that this study provides the strongest signal to date supporting vaccine acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, referred to as VADES. According to the speaker, as each dose was administered, the immune function of individuals declined. By the time of the fourth dose, the speaker asserts there was a significant increase in the risk of other infections, quantified as about a 550% increase, including infections such as the common cold, tuberculosis, and upper respiratory tract infections. The speaker notes that the effect was most pronounced in young people, specifically ages zero to nineteen, who reportedly had the highest risks of these other infections. The implication presented is that the injections are causing immune collapse and exhausting T cells, leading to immune dysregulation described as IgG4 class switching. The immune system is said to become dysfunctional as a result. Additionally, the speaker mentions that, consistent with other studies they reference, genes related to immune function are claimed to become shut down. The overall assertion is that these findings point to a troubling pattern of immune impairment associated with multiple vaccine doses, culminating in the claimed immune dysfunction and increased susceptibility to other infections. The speaker emphasizes the magnitude and reliability of the sample size, stating that having an entire country’s population as the study cohort constitutes the strongest possible sample size. The summary of the presented claims centers on dose-dependent immune decline, a marked increase in non-target infections after the fourth dose, greater impact on children, evidence of immune system exhaustion and dysregulation, and purported genetic downregulation of immune pathways, all described as arising from the vaccination regimen in this nationwide South Korean study.

I am Max Melling, the statistician behind this study, with Viveke as the medical expert. The main result of our study is shown on the screen. It displays the number of adverse effects in each vaccine batch, based on official Danish data created for the study. Some batches are small, while others are large. Normally, a good vaccine would show a nearly perfect line, while a very bad vaccine would have scattered points. However, we observe three almost perfect lines, which is unexpected and suggests a problem with the product. Participants were unable to give informed consent due to the unknown risks. This is a concerning safety signal that requires further investigation.

On the 15th, data accumulated from 18 million vaccination events or people is being tracked. The presenters attempt to compare vaccinated versus unvaccinated groups, with the claim that unvaccinated individuals do not face particular problems when interacting with others, while the discussion centers on the vaccinated group and a phenomenon described as “the green side” that initially shows low numbers for one to two weeks. From around February, a large peak emerges, continuing through March and April, suggesting that the effects observed may be related to vaccines and their side effects. It is suggested that doctors who were vaccinated may have observed effects on the same day, the following day, or about a week later, which could reflect the influence of vaccination, and this information is being sent to PMDA. One more finding is reported: the more vaccination is administered, the more the peak tends to move forward and to the left, indicating a shifting pattern in the timing of peaks. As the number of vaccinations increases, the “mountain” of deaths is said to occur earlier, implying that with increased vaccination there may be a shift toward earlier occurrence of deaths in a shorter interval. The speakers emphasize a key point: if there is no toxicity associated with the vaccine or no effect that would attract lipids, a peak may not occur. This is presented as the first finding: increasing vaccination frequency appears to move the peak. The implication drawn is that the observed shift in peaks is linked to the increasing number of vaccinations, and that the timing of peaks changes as vaccination numbers rise. The dialogue frames these observations as findings rather than assertions about vaccine safety, noting the potential role of vaccine-induced toxicity or lipid-adjuvant effects in driving the observed peaks, while also acknowledging that the absence of such effects would mean peaks might not develop.

According to the speaker, vaccination eligibility should only have been granted after a doctor determined it was advisable for an individual case, because—except for a single exception—virtually no one under 60 would have faced a chance of serious complications from coronavirus. The speaker claims that therefore, people under 60 should not have been vaccinated, and that filling sports halls with vaccination sites was completely contrary to the purposes for which the vaccines were authorized by the EMA. The speaker further argues that evaluating vaccine safety required that side effects be properly recorded. They quote the EMA as saying it expects many reports of side effects occurring during or shortly after vaccination, meaning that complaints must be reported in the first period of vaccination. The speaker then says that the government supported a policy in which these complaints were not reported in the first 14 days after vaccination because the vaccine would need 10 to 14 days to become effective. The speaker claims that all complaints in that time were instead attributed to coronavirus, calling this both fraudulent and deliberately endangering human lives. The speaker also refers to an ongoing “gigantic so-called unexplained excess mortality.” In summary, they state that the EMA information is devastating for the vaccination policy of Rutte and De Jonge, claiming the government knew the vaccines would not protect against virus transmission but did not share that information with the public. The speaker says the government pushed the vaccines on citizens with “lies,” concealed side effects, and endangered the health of everyone who took the vaccine. They conclude that the vaccination campaigns should be stopped as soon as possible because they are not safe and do not meet EMA requirements. The speaker ends by saying the government and all political parties that supported this should be held accountable for their “lies and deception,” and then hands the word to Jojim Koers.

Speaker 0 states that the study confirms suspicions from the past five years that common sense has deteriorated in the population. The study analyzed the VAERS system from the 1990s to 2024 and examined PRRs (proportional reporting ratios), which measure how many more adverse events occur with the COVID shots compared to the flu shot or other vaccines. It reports 8686 safety signals of neuropsychiatric adverse events, with some up to 3,000 times higher than the flu shot. The safety signal threshold defined by CDC/FDA for PRRs is greater than two, and all reported signals exceeded this threshold. The listed conditions include schizophrenia, dementia, Alzheimer's, cognitive impairment, strokes, brain clots, homicidal tendencies, homicidal behavior, and psychosis, described as people hallucinating and brain damage. The speaker notes that this large number of safety signals aligns with a recent study indicating that people who had strokes showed toxic spike protein production in their brains for up to seventeen months after vaccination, which the speaker suggests explains the observed deterioration in cognitive function.

The speaker claims that the COVID vaccine is toxic and could have caused the deaths of 17 million people worldwide. They suggest that there is a temporary increase in all-cause mortality following vaccine rollouts, which is consistent across different countries. Another speaker points out that normally, deaths decrease in the summer, but during the vaccine campaign, there are spikes in mortality, even in the Southern Hemisphere where it should be low. They mention that this pattern is seen during booster rollouts as well. This phenomenon is described as unprecedented.

A whistleblower provided access to 5 million confidential New Zealand government vaccination records. Analysis showed that the mortality rate in New Zealand increased for 5 months after vaccination, regardless of the time of year. The rate of mortality increase also rose with each subsequent booster. The chances of this excess being random and not caused by the experimental vaccines were calculated at 1 in 100 billion. The speaker requested the government to suspend the mRNA vaccines to prevent further harm. However, Speaker 1 disagreed, stating that over 120,000 deaths were prevented by COVID vaccines in England. The report mentioned by the first speaker has been debunked globally, as adverse events after vaccination do not necessarily mean they were caused by the vaccine.

The vaccine is ineffective for the first six weeks after the first shot. I'm assuming a a two shot, you know, a two dose vaccine like Pfizer or Moderna. And that during that period, the COVID infection rate goes up and the death rate goes up. And the the data the official data do not count you as vaccinated until two weeks after the second shot. So the deaths that happened during that first six weeks are attributed to unvaccinated to the unvaccinated group, which is not which is it's a it's a trick. It's a statistical trick. Then the vaccine appears to provide immunity and good immunity during the first month or two months, and then a precipitous decline, a waning that happens very, very quickly and very precipitously so that by the seventh month, it has lapsed into negative efficacy.

The speaker claims that the vaccine is toxic and could have caused the deaths of 17 million people worldwide. They argue that after each vaccine rollout, there is a temporary increase in overall mortality. This pattern is observed consistently across countries with sufficient data. Another speaker points out that typically, deaths decrease in the summer and increase in the winter, but during the COVID vaccine campaign, there are spikes in mortality right after the campaigns, even in the summer. They mention that this pattern is seen in both the northern and southern hemispheres. The speakers emphasize that this is a new phenomenon.

In a Japanese study of 20,000,000 people, they could determine vaccine status and found "highly significant that all the excess deaths were in the vaccinated group, that the non vaccinated group had none." Last week, "a study of twenty minute million people. 22,000,000 people. Yeah. Yeah. It's not a bad study." An Australian statistician's paper reportedly shows that "about three months after every splurge of a vaccine booster, mortality went up," with "the peak mortality was a hundred days after the after vaccine vaccination." This timing aligns with the Japanese finding. There’s mention of an Australian government inquiry into excess deaths that "said there's nothing in it." "That's all due to COVID."

In the message described, Speaker 0 highlights a key claim: the CDC and FDA were fully aware of the masking phenomenon within their empirical Bayesian analysis. The speaker emphasizes that this awareness was part of the information being conveyed in a letter to Bobby Kennedy. The central issue raised is not about general safety signals, but about the timing of deaths relative to vaccination. The speaker notes a concern that began earlier, stating that back in October there were discussions with Mike Eden about these injections. The concern is tied to what was observed in the data, specifically that “early on in March and April” the data appeared to be "screaming at us" when looking at thousands of deaths. The speaker provides a concrete statistic: “forty six percent of those deaths were occurring on the day of vaccination than one or two days.” The speaker then updates the figure, saying that they are “up to almost thirty nine thousand deaths” in total, and adds that “Twenty four percent of those deaths occurred on the day of vaccination or within one or two days.” The speaker asserts that this information “has been available month by month by month since about March, April 2021,” yet alleges that “the federal officials are still not acknowledging it.” Instead of acknowledging these signals, the speaker claims officials point to other metrics, stating they “go to these, you know, PRR, the proportional reporting ratios, or a more sophisticated” approach. The claim continues that when PRRs were showing safety signals, officials reacted as if, “oh, we're not using those. We're using empirical Bayesian analysis. They set the trigger.” In summary, the transcript presents a narrative in which the CDC and FDA are described as being aware of a masking phenomenon identified through empirical Bayesian analysis, with specific, alarming timing data linking a significant proportion of deaths to the day of vaccination or the following couple of days. The speaker contends this information has been publicly accessible on a monthly basis since early 2021, but accuses federal officials of not acknowledging it and of favoring a different analytic framework (PRR) or of claiming to use empirical Bayesian analysis after the fact, implying that the trigger for safety signals was set within that framework. The overall emphasis is on the alleged discrepancy between available data and official acknowledgment, as well as the choice of analytic methods used to interpret safety signals.

The speaker claims that the vaccine is toxic and could have killed 17 million people worldwide. They argue that after each booster rollout, there is a peak in all cause mortality, which is consistently observed across different countries. Another speaker points out that normally, deaths decrease in the summer, but during the COVID vaccine campaign, there are spikes in mortality right after vaccine campaigns, even in the Southern Hemisphere where it should be a low death period. They mention that this pattern is seen in all 17 countries they studied. Overall, they emphasize that these observations are unprecedented.

Speaker 0 asks about a report and how concerning it is, suggesting that if the reported figure is 10, there is a “real number” that could be higher. Speaker 1 says the main concern is that the analysis “dramatically understates the problem.” They describe the difficulty of getting autopsies during the pandemic and say medical professors didn’t want to perform them, resulting in very few autopsies. They state that NIH/CDC/FDA reviewed 96 pediatric autopsies and concluded about 10 were possible or probable. Speaker 1 then argues that safety signals were “screaming,” and points to VAERS. They claim there are almost 1.7 million total adverse events and 39,000 deaths worldwide. They say 24% of the 39,000 deaths occurred on the day of vaccination or within one or two days. Speaker 1 also references the point that VAERS doesn’t prove causation, while stating that if a person who was “perfectly healthy” died that day or within one or two days, they would “be blaming” the jab. They add that in some cases people may have been in bad health already, with death tipped over by another cause. Speaker 1 says the “bigger revelation,” which they claim was unveiled three weeks ago and is “still not being covered by the mainstream media,” involves FDA’s VAERS algorithm. They state that on 03/01/2021, Peter Marks (head of CBER/FDA’s division approving vaccines and surveilling post-approval safety) was briefed that their algorithm analyzing VAERS would “hide and mask safety signals.” They say that 26 days later, a new algorithm unmasked safety signals, producing 49 cases of extreme masking revealed and 25 safety signals, including sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, Bell’s palsy, and different types of strokes. They claim that similar data runs over the next three months showed more safety signals and more sudden death. Speaker 1 further claims that FDA did not “pin a badge” on Anna Scharzman, referred to as the father of their expert, and instead “shunned her off to the side,” ordered her to cease and desist, and decided to use the algorithm they had been warned would hide safety signals, which they say is still being used. Speaker 1 states that Peter Marks left for Eli Lilly and claims “the entire world” is in denial. They say they have been unable to broadcast the story or get interviews on CBS, ABC, NBC, PBS, MSNBC, or CNN, and that they challenged Jake Tapper, who they say agreed to read the report but has not invited them back yet.

The speaker discusses a paper from Denmark that reveals a significant variation in suspected adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine. The data shows a 1,000-fold difference in incidence depending on the batch of vaccines administered. This information is currently gaining popularity.

Western Australia authorities published the rate of adverse reactions to vaccines for 2021, noting it is six months late but describing the report as very honest. The data show adverse events following immunizations reported from 2017 through 2021, with a massive increase starting when COVID vaccines were introduced. The speaker states that, while more vaccines were given, the rate of adverse reactions for COVID vaccines was over 20, about 24 times higher per vaccine dose given. The description highlights the impact of the COVID vaccination program beginning in February 2021, after which adverse reactions rose sharply and “went the roof” compared to prior years. The speaker expresses hope that the United States and the United Kingdom governments will follow the level of candor shown by Western Australia.

The speaker claims that based on the number of vaccine doses administered worldwide, they have calculated the toxicity of the vaccine and believe it would have killed 17 million people. They also mention a correlation between booster rollouts and an increase in all-cause mortality, which they observe in multiple countries. Another speaker adds that typically, deaths increase in winter and decrease in summer, but during the COVID vaccine campaign, there are spikes in mortality right after vaccine campaigns, even in the summer. They note this pattern globally, including in the Southern Hemisphere. This phenomenon is described as unusual and unprecedented.

The speaker claims that the COVID vaccine is toxic and could have caused the deaths of 17 million people worldwide. They argue that after each vaccine rollout, there is a temporary increase in all-cause mortality. This pattern is observed consistently across countries with sufficient data. Another speaker points out that normally, deaths decrease in the summer, but during the COVID vaccine campaign, there are spikes in mortality. This is especially evident in the southern hemisphere, where there should be a low death period. The speakers conclude that this is a new phenomenon and it occurs globally during booster rollouts.

Vaccinated individuals are not less likely to get infected with COVID, but may have milder symptoms. Vaccines were introduced late in the pandemic, and data on vaccine status in hospitals may be inaccurate. Reports show a significant number of deaths following vaccination, raising concerns about vaccine safety globally. Calls have been made to remove these vaccines from the market due to their perceived dangers. Translation: Vaccinated people may still get COVID but might have less severe symptoms. Vaccine safety is being questioned due to reports of deaths following vaccination. There are concerns about the accuracy of hospital data on vaccine status.

The speakers discuss the correlation between COVID-19 vaccination campaigns and spikes in mortality. They observe that after vaccine rollouts, there is a noticeable increase in deaths, even during the summer months when mortality rates should be low. This pattern is consistent across multiple countries and age groups. The speakers mention the presence of winter peaks and booster peaks in mortality data, which contradicts the expected trends. This correlation is observed globally, including in the Southern Hemisphere where a decrease in deaths is expected during the summer.

6月15日現在、1800万人の接種回数分のデータが蓄積されている。接種者と非接種者を比較すると、非接種者はフラットだが、接種者は1ヶ月後から3～4ヶ月にかけて死亡者の山ができる。 医師たちは接種当日、翌日、1週間ぐらいに発生した副作用をPMDAに送る。接種を重ねるほど、死亡者の山が左に移動する現象が確認された。つまり、打てば打つほど死亡時期が早まる。 ワクチン接種に毒性や死亡を誘導する効果がなければ、この山はできない。接種回数が増えるほど山が左に移動するのは、毒素が蓄積し、回数が増えるほど早く死亡することを意味すると思われる。 **Translation:** As of June 15th, data has been accumulated for 18 million vaccinations. Comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, the unvaccinated remain flat, but the vaccinated show a peak in deaths from one month to three to four months after vaccination. Doctors send reports of side effects occurring on the day of vaccination, the next day, and within about a week to the PMDA. It was confirmed that as vaccinations increase, the peak of deaths shifts to the left. In other words, the more shots, the earlier the death. If the vaccination did not have toxic or death-inducing effects, this peak would not exist. The more the number of vaccinations increases, the more the peak shifts to the left, which seems to mean that toxins accumulate, and the more the number of vaccinations, the faster death occurs.

The speaker explains that the Pfizer shot is designed so that its messenger RNA enters cells and can be replicated indefinitely by ribosomes, so it “cannot get it out of your body,” and there is “no detoxing from it.” The speaker says that although the body can be detoxed or made healthier overall, it is not possible to eliminate the spike protein, antibodies to spike protein, or advocated monoclonal antibodies. The speaker claims that the presence of spike proteins “sensitize your dendritic cells and your b cells,” and that “those spikes are gonna be there probably forever.” A central claim is that messenger RNA “ablates, wipes out, destroys Toll like receptor three, seven, and eight.” The speaker describes Toll-like receptors as “God inside our body,” “radars” that constantly patrol to get rid of viruses, bacteria, and things that do not belong, and as the “innate, God given” immune system present from birth. The speaker asserts that destroying Toll-like receptors 3, 7, and 8 makes people “more susceptible to getting COVID,” and claims this is why people “that get the shots suddenly are sick.” The speaker further says doctors “are illiterate and not reading” the mechanisms. The speaker adds that in hospital settings, people treated with remdesivir and placed on a ventilator have “greater than eighty percent mortality rate.” The speaker frames this as part of a known mechanism: spike proteins enter the nucleus of cells and “bind to our DNA.” The speaker states that any claim that the spike proteins do not irreversibly bind DNA is wrong, and says the binding “blocks the door,” converting the cell into an abnormal cell that “if that cell replicates, will turn into cancer.” The speaker also claims that spike binding prevents “our God given immune system repair enzymes” from repairing the damage, allowing cancer to form. The speaker links this to a “explosion of cancer in people that get these shots,” including people who were in remission and later experience cancer returning or worsening, and mentions endometrial cancer and “all kinds of blood cancers, lymphatic cancers, breast cancers.” The speaker refers to doctor Ryan Cole discussing this. The speaker also cites recent data, stating that a person “is injected” and is then “eight point one two times more likely to be infected with Omicron.” The speaker concludes by asserting that repeated shots further suppress the immune system: the more shots, the more “destroy your immune system” and the faster it happens. The speaker then claims that “German data” says that by the end of 2022, every fully vaccinated person over age 30 may have the equivalent of “full blown vaccine induced

The speaker discusses the increase in mortality rates after the vaccine rollout in Australia. They point out a peak in mortality during the country's summer, which coincides with the sudden rollout of the third dose of the vaccine. The same pattern is observed in different states of Australia. The speaker then mentions a vaccine equity program in Mississippi, where the most vulnerable people were vaccinated. This program resulted in a significant increase in cumulative doses given and a corresponding peak in mortality rates for individuals aged 25 to 64 in poor states across the United States, such as Alabama.