reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 asserts that packaged DNA fragments have been found en masse as vaccine contaminants. Once they reach the nucleus, short DNA sequences have an increased propensity to insert into chromosomal DNA. The possible consequences are unending, including disruption of the exquisitely tuned network that controls cell division and differentiation, which can lead to cancer and developmental defects. Mutations in sperm and fertilized egg cells could render altered traits inheritable. Speaker 0 further states that cost effective procedures to reliably separate mass produced RNA from plasmids do not exist, and therefore contamination of RNA vaccines with plasmid DNA must be expected to be the rule and not the exception. Whoever propagates RNA vaccines as being safe and effective, whoever claims that nothing can happen to your genome is either incredibly ignorant or endlessly evil. That person is turning his back on the horror scenario that is unfolding in front of our very eyes. Fellow citizens and physicians of the world are urged to turn away from the perpetrators of this monstrous crime against humanity. Speaker 0 concludes with admonitions to do this to save yourself, your descendants, and to rescue the name of your family or go down in history as one of the greatest criminals of all time. Speaker 1 responds: Thank you very much, professor Bhakti. You continue to be an inspiration both scientifically and ethically for all of us.

"Packaged DNA fragments have been found en masse as vaccine contaminants." "Once they reach the nucleus, short DNA sequences have an increased propensity to insert into chromosomal DNA." "The possible consequences are unending." "Disruption of the exquisitely tuned network that controls cell division and differentiation can lead to cancer and to developmental defects." "Mutations in sperm and fertilized egg cells could render altered traits inheritable." "Cost effective procedures to reliably separate mass produced RNA from plasmids do not exist." "Contamination of RNA vaccines with plasmid DNA must therefore be expected to be the rule and not the exception." "Whoever propagates RNA vaccines as being safe and effective, whoever claims that nothing can happen to your genome, is either incredibly ignorant or endlessly evil."

They tested many vials and found DNA in all of them, with “a lot of DNA” in all the vials and above alleged EMA limits. The claim is that these limits rely on “naked DNA” assessments rather than assessments for slip and nanoparticle encapsulated DNA. One DNA fragment identified is the “SV40 promoter enhancer,” described as a strong mammalian promoter. The speaker says that the presence of SV40 promoter enhancer, along with other DNA fragments, can induce problems that “basically all lead to cancer.” The speaker explains they considered gene mutations and looked for reports of specific gene mutations related to the situation. They say they expected to find nothing but did not find nothing. They also state they are not asserting a causal link, but are seeking evidence to generate hypotheses. They describe how SV40 in particular can cause genomic instability, insertions can occur, and gene defects could be anticipated when inserting cells with billions of fragments of foreign DNA. They also mention potential for epigenetic modifications, referring to methylation patterns discussed by Kevin in a preprint. The speaker’s bottom line is that there are questions “everybody kind of needs to answer,” and they direct viewers to read their Substack for those questions.

Kevin McKernan recently discovered that there is contamination in the mRNA shots with cDNA, including a cancer-promoting segment called SV40. SV40 turns on cancer genes in the human body and impairs tumor suppressor systems. This means that the shots not only promote cancer through SV40 but also inhibit our ability to fight cancer. The increase in cancer rates is undeniable, but the question remains: how much of this is due to the vaccines?

Speaker 0 argues that because it’s classified as a vaccine, they don’t have to worry about being sued. Speaker 1 counters that there is immunity from liability dependent on there having been no fraud, and asserts that there clearly was fraud, so in light of that... Speaker 0 expresses surprise at known caveats to liability. Speaker 1 confirms the caveats and says it makes the situation more interesting. Speaker 0 asks how fraud is defined in this context, noting that drugs were sold with many studies but only one was good. Speaker 1 responds, “Let's try this one,” and discusses safety testing: the insufficient amount of safety testing before release was done with mRNA vaccines produced in a process that did not involve DNA. The product injected into billions of people involved DNA plasmids, with massive contamination in the shots actually delivered, including the SV40 promoter (simian virus 40). The point is that safety testing was performed on one process, but people were injected with something different that had other components not tested, which Speaker 1 calls fraudulent. Speaker 0 asks for an explanation of the SV40 issue. Speaker 1 explains production methods: techniques to generate product using a plasmid, a circular piece of DNA, allowing vats to grow the product before coating in lipid nanoparticle, with bacteria doing the work. There is a requirement to purify DNA and set standards for residual DNA contamination. In this case, not only was quality control poor, but there was a much more painstaking way to produce the same product that did not involve DNA plasmids at all. As a result, vials given to Kevin McKernan, containing material actually injected into people, showed DNA contamination across the board. Speaker 1 states that leftover DNA includes the SV40 promoter, a genetic trigger from simian virus 40, which is carcinogenic. This promoter is left over in vials from shots actually injected into people, implying that the claims about the potential for mRNA shots to integrate into the genome were incorrect. Speaker 1 asserts that there is DNA in the vials, not just some old DNA, and that it includes the SV40 promoter, a genetic engineering tool with carcinogenic potential. Therefore, Speaker 1 concludes, this seems to be clear fraud: you can’t inject a different product into the public on the basis of safety testing conducted with a product produced by a different process.

Integrating foreign genes into chromosomes can lead to cancer and other health issues, permanently altering genetics and affecting future generations. This is a call to recognize the dangers posed by RNA vaccines being introduced globally by organizations like the WHO, CDC, and FDA. The initial vaccines have already shown harmful effects due to the introduction of foreign genes into the body. The production of mRNA does not ensure that these genes, often derived from bacteria, won't enter human cells. As a result, individuals receiving these vaccines may experience genetic alterations, and any genetically altered cell is at risk.

Speaker 0 asks: "Do you think there's evidence that the changes to people to their genetic structure wrought by these vaccines could be passed on to their children?" Speaker 1 responds: "The McCullough Foundation, of which I am the vice president, we just published a person who had cancer of the bladder, which is a very severe cancer, in that tumor, so in the bladder cells that had become dysplastic, that messenger RNA was found in the cancerous cells of this tumor. So it seems to be integrating. Now the question is, is it integrating in a way that is can be passed on to the offspring, or is it so dysfunctional that it's killing the host before it can be passed on? And and I don't know that we yet know that, but remember, the science is the topography of ignorance. I mean, there's a lot about this that is is very, very concerning. There's also a study that this messenger RNA seems to have transcribed into liver cells."

The speaker argues that genetic vaccines are totally unacceptable and defines the introduction of transgenes into the human body as gene therapy, questioning how this can be considered acceptable practice for creating vaccines. They assert that encapsulating messenger RNA in nanoparticles and administering it leads to off-target effects, with the effects starting from the ovaries to the brain, liver, spleen, and bone marrow. They emphasize that the biggest problem is going to the bone marrow and the reproductive organs like the ovaries, and then every possible organ. Regarding spike proteins, the speaker states that spike proteins are still detected in the rash after more than a year, which they interpret as evidence that messenger RNA is producing spike proteins. They contend that there is no way for a year-old spike protein to remain in the rash and be detected. Personal choices are also mentioned: they did not choose to get vaccinated because they think it was a foolish decision from the beginning. They have not even opted for the flu shot because they consider it an unwise choice.

The speaker claims SV40 in literature turns on cancer genes. They further claim the spike protein impairs tumor suppressor systems P53 and BRCA, promoting cancer and inhibiting the ability to fight it. The speaker suggests cancer rates are up, and the question is how much is due to vaccines. They state that repeated shots every six months increase the chances of getting loaded with synthetic genetic material that will cause harm, including heart disease, neurologic disease, blood clotting, immunologic problems, and cancer.

The speaker discusses signals of transgenerational harm, clarifying they are not referring to transgender issues but harms that span generations. They cite CDC data to support a claim that, beginning right after mass vaccination of childbearing-age women in early 2021, there is a statistically significant inflection point in infant mortality. They state that infant mortality rates had been steadily decreasing for thirty years, but in 2021, after mass vaccination, the rate “shoots right up,” and it “hasn't gone down since.” As of 2025, they assert, babies are dying at seventy-seven percent excess, with Mississippi reportedly declaring a state of emergency over the situation. The speaker further claims that mothers are not taking the shots anymore. They suggest that some of the genetic material from the vaccination appears to integrate into the body and may be passed on, describing it as a legacy effect. They emphasize that most people took the shots in 2021, and express concern that there could be effects through the generations as a result.

Speaker 1 reports evidence from multiple sources, including InModia lab in Germany and John Cantazaro at NEO7 Bioscience, that Pfizer and Moderna code is reverse transcribed and inserted into human DNA. According to Speaker 1, this means individuals could carry a "stamp" of Pfizer or Moderna in their genome. The speaker suggests the body may not be editing out or repressing this code, as spike protein evidence persists for years. Transmission of spike protein producing genetic code is possible, along with fragments of code for the spike protein, SV40, and other DNA fragments. Speaker 1 raises concerns about potential health issues like blood clots, heart damage, autoimmunity, and unusual tumors. John Cantazaro's research indicates a dramatically altered genetic profile in vaccinated individuals, tilting towards neoplasm or cancer. Speaker 1 shares an anecdote about a patient who developed terminal cancer after vaccination, with Cantazaro confirming the presence of Pfizer code in the patient's genome.

The speakers discuss how initial kidney cells from monkeys used to make vaccines inadvertently gave people simian virus 40, which can lead to rapid cancer. One speaker says that this is one of the cancer-causing issues with the shots, explaining that it's supposed to stay out of the nucleus but can get in. One speaker says the initial claim was that the shot would stay local, in the arm, and dissipate quickly, but "they know that's not true." The other speaker mentions pseudouridine, a replacement nucleotide that is hard to break down, and that there's no study showing that it can be cleared from the body. This could be why some people have high antibody levels years later.

The speaker describes the first peer-reviewed paper documenting evidence of genomic integration of mRNA vaccine genetic material in a human being. They report a case of a 31-year-old woman who developed stage four bladder cancer within a year after three mRNA shots. They say they analyzed her circulating tumor DNA and performed multiomic analysis, including transcriptomic and proteomic analysis. They report finding, “within her chromosome 19,” in the circulating tumor DNA, a 20 base pair segment matching the Pfizer DNA plasmid reference sequence. The speaker characterizes the finding as a “non human non human chimeric hybrid,” stating it transitions from human to Pfizer to human. They add that there is “about a one in a trillion chance this was just an anomaly.”

The introduction of foreign genes into human chromosomes can lead to immediate cancer and inflammation, and these changes can be passed on to future generations. This is a serious warning about the dangers posed by RNA vaccines being introduced globally by organizations like the WHO, CDC, and FDA. The first vaccines have already been released, and they are causing significant harm by introducing foreign genes into the body. The production of mRNA does not ensure that these bacterial genes will not enter human cells, resulting in genetic alterations. Any cell that undergoes such genetic changes is at risk.

Speaker 0: We need to investigate irregularities in their menstrual cycle, that’s number one, because that’s a little concerning and the reaction shouldn’t be interfering with that. Speaker 1: You’re a urologist, you must understand what’s going on with it. Speaker 0: It’s weird. I hope we don’t find out that there’s somehow this mRNA losing the body, because it has to be impacting something hormonal. It can impact menstrual cycles. The entire next generation is, like, super fucked up. Speaker 1: So tell me more, what’s developing with the mutation process? Speaker 0: They’re still conducting experiments, they’re optimizing it slowly, they’re very cautious and don’t want to accelerate too much. They’re doing it as exploratory work so you don’t advertise future mutations. Speaker 1: How would the research study be delayed for COVID stuff? Speaker 0: Now we’re focusing on mRNA beyond COVID. Our forward-looking studies must stay on track. Speaker 1: What is RNA going to be used for in the future? Speaker 0: Lots of stuff. Not just for viruses—we’re applying it to oncology, gene editing, and more. The portfolio has moved beyond COVID. There’s a dedicated COVID environment team; the company is asking where they’ll use this technology in the future for investors. Speaker 1: Is Pfizer going to be held liable for vaccine injuries? Speaker 0: I don’t think so. Usually drugs have known side effects. There have been reports like Clozapine being illegal, and Biox with heart issues—though that wasn’t for us, it was another company. They told me to monitor over time. So far, nothing major; we’ll see if anything arises. Speaker 1: Hope nobody grows three legs or the entire next generation is fucked up. Right? Speaker 0: Yeah. Or that their menstrual cycles are investigated down the line because that’s concerning. If you think about the science, it shouldn’t interact with the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, which links hormones and menstrual cycles. It shouldn’t interfere—yet something might be happening. Speaker 1: The HPG axis. Speaker 0: It goes hypothalamus, pituitary, gonads—signal shingles. The HPG axis is tied to fertility problems. Speaker 1: They decide to pack these hormones somehow. But the signaling into the brain is tricky, and the vaccine doesn’t cross the blood-brain barrier. Speaker 0: If it does come down the line and something bad happens, there’d be substantial criticism given the social pressure and professional consequences. If downstream issues are really serious, the scale would be significant.

The speaker explains that there is contamination in the messenger RNA, including fragments of DNA called cDNA, with one of them being s v 40, a known cancer-promoting segment. The other speaker mentions that mainstream news reports estimate that millions of Americans had cancer due to SV 40 contamination in the past. The first speaker confirms that SV 40 turns on cancer genes and that the spike protein in the shots impairs tumor suppressor systems. They conclude that the shots promote cancer through SV 40 and suppress our ability to fight cancer. The speaker acknowledges that cancer rates are increasing, but the extent to which vaccines contribute to this is still uncertain.

Speaker 0: They argue that because the vaccine is classified as such, they don’t have to worry about being sued. They claim immunity from liability is dependent on there being no fraud, and there clearly was fraud. Speaker 1: They say there is fraud. They note that immunity from liability depends on fraud, and in light of that, it matters. They explain that there was fraud. Speaker 0: Expresses surprise and asks for caveats about fraud. Acknowledges there were caveats. Speaker 1: Confirms there is fraud and says it makes the situation more interesting. Speaker 0: Asks how fraud is defined, noting that drugs were sold with multiple studies and only one was good. Speaker 1: Responds with a point about safety testing for the mRNA vaccines. States that the insufficient safety testing was done before release, and that the product injected into billions of people involved DNA plasmids. There is massive contamination in the shots actually delivered, including the SV40 promoter from simian virus 40. The point is that safety testing for one drug was completed, but people were injected with something different that had other components that were not tested, which is described as fraudulent. Speaker 0: Requests an explanation of the SV40 issue for the audience. Speaker 1: Describes production techniques used to generate the product. Explains that a plasmid, a circular piece of DNA, was used to produce the product in vats, with bacteria performing the production, later coated in lipid nanoparticle. There is a requirement to purify DNA and set standards for DNA contamination, with limits that cannot be exceeded. In this case, the problem isn’t only poor quality control but that there was a more painstaking way to produce the same product that did not involve DNA plasmids at all. Consequently, leftover material in vials injected into people contained DNA contamination across the board. Kevin McKernan tested vials, finding DNA contamination in the samples. Speaker 1: Explains that the DNA left over includes the SV40 promoter, a genetic trigger from simian virus 40, which is known to be carcinogenic. Since this promoter is left in the vials from injections given to people, it challenges the claim that the mRNA shots could not integrate into the genome. While acknowledging that there are cellular processes such as reverse transcription, the speaker asserts that even the claim of “no DNA” is false because there is DNA in the vials, specifically DNA with the SV40 promoter, a genetic engineering tool with carcinogenic potential. The speaker concludes that this appears to be fraud: injecting a different product into the public on the basis of safety testing that was conducted with a product produced by a different process. Speaker 0: Reiterates the conclusion: you can’t inject a different product into the public on the basis of safety testing that was done with something produced by a different process.

The speaker cautions that we don’t know the long-term side effects of modifying people’s DNA and RNA to directly encode the ability to produce antibodies, and whether that causes other mutations or downstream risks.

Alden and colleagues found that Pfizer's genetic code can be integrated into the human genome within an hour in a cancerous cell line. This suggests that Pfizer and Moderna's genetic material might become a permanent part of human DNA. There is no study confirming or denying this possibility. The concern is that if eggs or sperm incorporate this genetic code, it could be passed on to future generations. This lack of research is seen as reckless and worrisome.

Speaker 0: The entire human genome has been poisoned with a gene that has never been in the human genome ever in history. Reverse transcriptase doesn't only cause cancer. If something is reverse transcribed and alters the DNA of a sperm or an egg, that DNA change, if that sperm or egg survives and turns into a human being, lasts forever. Speaker 1: This is the magnitude of evil we are dealing with. We are dealing with people who have the money, the power to pollute the entire human genome. I think because of this, we're gonna lose about a billion children. So any mother any mother to be, even if she is not pregnant yet, if she gets an mRNA vaccine, those mRNAs are gonna go to the ovaries. There's DNA that stays silent, that is never transcribed into proteins until the next generation. And it'll only show up when that adult tries to have another child. Five billion people have been injected so far on this planet. Half of them are women. Two and a half billion. Half of them will be women who are young enough to have children. There are one point two five billion carriers of mutations in the egg cell line of their bodies. One point two five million women who are capable of giving birth to children who carry something that has never been seen before in the human species, in the entire human genome.

Speaker 0 raised concerns about “endotoxin” appearing in COVID genetic vaccines and asked whether that could factor into the types of damage and problems under discussion. Speaker 1 responded that there are “a lot of different factors,” and referenced studies from Kevin McKernan and Philip Buchholz describing contamination “as V40.” Speaker 1 described this contamination as a possible mechanism for how the vaccine “became a bifida fudge too,” and asked whether the vaccine stimulated the ability to stimulate cancer cells, for example. Speaker 0 asked whether Speaker 1 was aware of cases where people could be treated for either vaccine injury or long COVID using fecal transplant. Speaker 1 said that fecal transplant is something they possibly would bring up, while also emphasizing that there are “other ways to fix” issues coming in the future and that research is ongoing—“one experiment after another,” where findings lead to new work, and others’ opinions can validate, verify, and reproduce results. Speaker 0 then shifted to discussing “the art and perhaps of refloralization,” saying they “really like this term” as a floral term for something that “maybe doesn’t look as nice if you were to be staring at it.”

The speaker believes vaccines are causing cancer, with the risk increasing exponentially with each booster, because boosters suppress T cell response, which controls cancer. Experts claim messenger RNA is safe because we are exposed to it daily and it's easily disposed of, but the speaker argues that mRNA vaccines are stabilized to prevent disposal, which is the core problem. The speaker claims that mRNA can integrate and hack your genetic code, promoting oncogenes and down-regulating suppressor genes. They state that the UK and Australia have invested heavily in mRNA technology without proper oversight. The speaker advocates for ending this culture and improving population health.

The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA, not just mRNA. This DNA is the DNA vector used as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction. This was discovered by sequencing vials of Pfizer vaccine from Colombia. It's surprising that there's any DNA in there. The speaker is alarmed about the possible consequences of this, including rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. Mixing DNA with a lipid complex allows it to enter cells and become a permanent fixture. This is a real hazard for genome modification of long-lived somatic cells, like stem cells, and could cause a sustained autoimmune attack. There is also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people. The risk is not zero and it may be high enough that we ought to figure out if this is happening or not.

The speaker reports that they tested many vials and found DNA in all of them, with “a lot of DNA” in all vials and levels over the alleged EMA limits. They state these EMA limits are “too high” because they rely on “naked” DNA assessments rather than slip and nanoparticle encapsulated DNA assessment. They say the reason for highlighting these findings is the identification of a DNA fragment called the SV40 promoter enhancer, described as a strong mammalian promoter. They add that the presence of SV40 and the other DNA fragments can induce problems “that basically all lead to cancer,” and they summarize this as a connection between foreign DNA fragments and cancer-related outcomes. The speaker then shifts to gene mutations and describes investigating whether there are reports of specific gene mutations in the relevant context. They say they did not find the expected evidence—“I didn’t find nothing”—and clarify that they are not claiming a causal link. They describe their goal as generating hypotheses based on evidence. They state that the presence of SV40 in particular can cause genomic instability, including insertions and gene defects. They connect this to the idea of inserting cells containing billions of fragments of foreign DNA, which they say raises the potential for epigenetic modifications. They mention that Kevin discussed epigenetic methylation patterns in a preprint and that those methylation patterns are described there. They conclude that there are “questions that everybody kind of needs to answer,” which they say they asked in a Substack and invite readers to read it, referring to the Substack as containing the questions they want addressed.

The speaker explains that the messenger RNA in the shots is contaminated with cDNA, including a cancer-promoting segment called s v 40. They mention that s v 40 turns on cancer genes in the human body and that the spike protein in the shots impairs tumor suppressor systems. The speaker suggests that the shots promote cancer through s v 40 and inhibit our ability to fight cancer. They also mention that cancer rates are increasing. The speaker raises the question of how much of this is due to the vaccines.