reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Impact of childhood vaccination on short and long term chronic health outcomes in children, a birth cohort study. 18,468 subjects. The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis. Six hundred percent more acute and chronic ear infections. Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Five and a half times risk. Six hundred and sixteen percent increase. Learning issues, developmental delays, speech delays, language delays. Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities. This is devastating. This may be the most important study that has ever been done and it needs to be published.

Speaker describes a Henry Ford Medical Center study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children (2000–2016). Dr. Marcus Servis agreed to conduct it, recruiting a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians. Using medical records, the study followed about sixteen thousand vaccinated and two thousand unvaccinated children and aimed to show the CDC vaccine schedule is safe to reduce vaccine hesitancy. Findings showed higher rates in the vaccinated group for several conditions: four point two nine times asthma, three point zero three times atopic disease, five point nine six times autoimmune disease, and five point five three times neurodevelopmental disorders. ADHD: two hundred sixty cases in the vaccinated group, none in the unvaccinated. After ten years, seventeen percent of the unvaccinated had a chronic health issue versus fifty seven percent of the vaccinated. The study’s publication was blocked because its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe.

The speaker asserts that the MMR and MMR V vaccines have been linked to two thousand six hundred percent more deaths than measles infection since 1995. The claim is that for the past thirty years, the MMR shots have killed far more children than measles, and that hundreds of infants and toddlers died after these shots, often from SIDS (sudden infant death syndrome), cardiac arrest, seizures, and encephalitis. The speaker emphasizes that these shots are killing some of these children, with most deaths occurring within about two weeks after the shot, and forty percent dying within one week. The speaker notes that the temporality checks out and that most of these deaths occurred at ages one to one and a half, right when they receive the MMR shots. The speaker reports that twenty-five percent of these deaths were classified as sudden infant death syndrome. The speaker describes babies dying in their sleep as a result of these shots and calls the situation absolutely disturbing and particular in terms of the causes of death. In summary, the speaker states that all of this combined in the study shows unequivocally that these shots are deadly, and concludes that the MMR and MMRV shots should not be given anymore. The suggestion is to split them up if parents still want them, rather than administering the full combination.

Speaker 0/J: The discussion centers on a study with dramatic implications, including claims that publishing such data could be career-ending, and questions about why the data would be so catastrophic. Speaker 2: The study involved eighteen thousand four hundred sixty eight subjects, of which one thousand nine hundred fifty seven were fully unvaccinated. When comparing the health outcomes of the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated, they found an increased risk in the vaccinated of several chronic health conditions. The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis—specifically four point two nine times in the adjusted analysis—and they note there are studies showing a range from three point two six to five point six five. Speaker 1: They also found three times the risk for atopic diseases. Speaker 2: Atopic diseases are described as a subset of allergic diseases. Speaker 1: They found an almost six times risk for autoimmune disease. Speaker 3: The autoimmune diseases this paper looked at include thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus, MS, multiple sclerosis, and Guillain Barre syndrome. They mention there are over 80 different autoimmune diseases, and their data showed for autoimmunity a six times increase in those who got vaccines when compared to the unvaccinated. Speaker 2: This is presented as staggering because autoimmune disorders represent significant morbidity and health costs and suffering accrued over a lifetime. Neurodevelopmental disorders are also discussed. Speaker 0: What kind numbers we talked about? Do you remember? Speaker 1: Five and a half times risk for neurodevelopmental disorders. Speaker 2: They state the immune system is intimately connected with both brain development and brain functioning, and so when the immune system gets triggered by illness, potentially by vaccination, you can get neuropsychiatric symptoms presumably related to brain inflammation and immune processes in the brain. Speaker 0: Two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities, four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated, Speaker 3: Three times the rate of developmental delay. They found the same patterns as with allergy and autoimmunity. Also, six times more acute and chronic ear infections. Speaker 2: Interestingly, there were several health conditions where they couldn't even do this analysis because there were none in the unvaccinated group. The mathematical formulas require non-zero counts in both groups to compare risk. Speaker 1: For example, there were two sixty two children who had ADHD in the vaccinated group. Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero cases of ADHD. Speaker 3: These results are described as mind boggling. Conditions were not found at all in almost two thousand unvaccinated kids: zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities in the unvaccinated.

The speaker asks if there has been a study comparing the health outcomes of children following the CDC vaccination schedule and those who are unvaccinated. The other speaker says they are not aware of such a study and suggests it may be considered bad malpractice not to vaccinate a child. They discuss the possibility of a retrospective study using the Vaccine Safety Datalink, but note the need to control for confounders. The speaker presents an exhibit showing higher rates of health conditions in vaccinated children and suggests the need for larger studies to confirm or refute these findings. The other speaker agrees.

Speaker 0 argues that the original study relied heavily on statistical modeling, rather than presenting basic raw proportions. When they examined the raw proportions, they found that every single one of the 22 chronic disease categories was proportionally higher in the vaccinated group, including cancer. The speaker notes that the study claimed there was no difference in cancer, treating cancer as a control, but asserts there was a difference in cancer when looking at raw data. They claim that for rare outcomes, the modeling used in the study is not very reliable, and no basic proportional analysis was performed by the original authors. However, when they conducted such an analysis themselves, they found cancer was fifty-four percent higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated children. The speaker concludes that there is biological plausibility behind these findings.

Speaker 0 argues that a critical missing piece in autism research is vaccinated versus unvaccinated studies, and notes there are six good studies to rely on. They claim these studies have been systematically suppressed and ignored by the mainstream media and the medical establishment. The summary of specific study claims is as follows: - Two studies by Gallier and Goodman show that the birth dose of the hepatitis B vaccine significantly increases autism risk. - Three studies by Anthony Mawson confirmed that vaccination increases the odds of developing autism by at least 4.2-fold. - Preterm birth coupled with vaccination increases the odds of neurodevelopmental disability by more than 12-fold compared to preterm birth without vaccination. - A study by Hooker and Miller published in 2021 found that vaccination increases autism risk five-fold. - Vaccination in the absence of breastfeeding increases autism risk 12.5-fold. - Vaccination in addition to cesarean birth increases autism risk 18.7-fold. The speaker states that after conducting a systematic review of a thousand studies, their belief is that the autism and chronic disease epidemics are primarily caused by toxicants, mostly from vaccines and about a dozen additional toxicants.

The speaker described observing a growing trend of patients choosing not to vaccinate over the next decade and sought to determine if he could prove differences. He collected data from his practice, examining every baby born there, and published the findings in an international journal of public health. The study, described as peer reviewed and robust, reported massive increases in several health outcomes among the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated, including four to five hundred percent more allergies, autoimmune conditions, and neurodevelopmental issues, as well as infections of all kinds. Following the online publication of the study, he received a call from his attorney instructing him not to see any patients, not to write any prescriptions, and not to enter the office. He was told, “Your license has been emergently suspended. You are a threat to public health.” He stated, “Today is the last time I will be doing clinical medicine in Oregon.” He added, “Knowing that you guys are keeping it going, the heart of this place lives on.”

An outside expert analyzed data from 2,700 vaccinated and 560 unvaccinated patients in a medical practice. The study found that vaccinated patients had higher rates of asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema, sinusitis, gastroenteritis, respiratory infections, otitis media, conjunctivitis, breathing issues, and behavioral issues like ADD and ADHD. The speaker claims that vaccines can shift the immune system towards allergy and autoimmunity, leading to more infections. The medical board responded by revoking the speaker's license. The speaker argues that the association between vaccines and health issues is not a coincidence, citing other studies and mechanisms of action like aluminum toxicity and immune activation from too many vaccines.

An outside expert was hired to gather data on every patient born in the speaker's practice, providing a strong foundation for their findings. The speaker presents slides showing the health outcomes of vaccinated and unvaccinated children, including asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema, sinusitis, gastroenteritis, vascular infections, otitis media, conjunctivitis, breathing issues, and behavioral issues. The speaker argues that vaccines can shift the immune system towards allergy and autoimmunity, leading to more infections and health problems. The speaker also mentions that their medical license was revoked despite multiple studies supporting their findings and a mechanism of action involving aluminum and immune activation from too many vaccines. The video is available on doctorsinscience.com.

"Chronic disease has gone from twelve point eight percent in our children in the nineteen eighties to over fifty four percent of our kids now." "72 times we are altering the immune system of our children with our vaccine program." "There'd be one easy study to rule it out, compare vaccinated children to completely unvaccinated children." "But we don't know because they've never done the study." "The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis." "Six hundred percent more acute and chronic ear infections." "Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated." "Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities."

A birth cohort study on the impact of childhood vaccination on short- and long-term chronic health outcomes reports results from a large sample (18,468 subjects). The discussion surrounding the study emphasizes that, if results showed vaccines were associated with chronic diseases, the findings would be highly compelling and valuable. The reported outcomes from the vaccinated group include: - Asthma diagnosis: vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis. - Acute and chronic ear infections: six hundred percent more. - Speech disorders: four point four seven times the amount in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. - Learning issues and related developmental concerns: a six hundred and sixteen percent increase in learning issues, developmental delays, speech delays, and language delays. In contrast, the unvaccinated group is described as having zero occurrences in several categories, including dysfunction, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, and other psychological disabilities. The discussion highlights the magnitude of the differences as a major point of emphasis, with statements such as “It’s a big difference” and “This is devastating.” There is strong advocacy for the study’s publication, including claims that “This paper should have been rushed to publication on an emergency basis.” The speakers assert, “We are systematically making kids sick and not just a little bit sick, very sick.” They describe the study as potentially “the most important study that has ever been done,” insisting that it needs to be published, and noting that if a particular researcher “puts his name on this, his career is over.” Emotional reactions are evident, with admissions like “I mean, obviously, like, really emotional.” There is a specific mention that “Zervos probably gonna lose his job over this.”

The speaker hired an expert to analyze data from 2,700 variably vaccinated and 560 unvaccinated patients in their practice, age-matched for comparison. The speaker claims the data, available at doctorsandscience.com, reveals significant differences in health outcomes. According to the speaker's slides, unvaccinated children had lower rates of asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema, sinusitis, gastroenteritis, respiratory infections, otitis media, conjunctivitis, other infections, breathing issues, and behavioral issues like ADD/ADHD. The speaker states there were no cases of ADD/ADHD in unvaccinated patients over 10 years. The speaker suggests vaccines shift the immune system towards allergy and autoimmunity, leading to more infections. The speaker argues that the association between vaccines and negative health outcomes is not coincidental, citing multiple studies and mechanisms of action, including aluminum and immune activation from too many vaccines too soon. The speaker states that the medical board revoked their license in response to this study.

"Impact of childhood vaccination on short and long term chronic health outcomes in children, a birth cohort study." "18,468 subjects." "The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis." "Six hundred percent" "more acute and chronic ear infections." "Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated." "Five and a half times risk. Six hundred and sixteen percent increase." "Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities." "None. It's a big difference." "This is devastating." "This paper should have been rushed to publication on an emergency basis." "We are systematically making kids sick, and not just a little bit sick, very sick." "This may be the most important study that has ever been done and it needs to be published." "He knows. If he puts his name on this, his career is over." "Zervos probably gonna lose his job over this." "This is an inconvenient study for the entire vaccine agenda."

- "Eighteen thousand four hundred and sixty eight subjects, one thousand nine hundred fifty seven of them were fully unvaccinated." - "When comparing the health outcomes of the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated, they found an increased risk in the vaccinated of several chronic health conditions." - "The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis." - "They found a almost six times risk for autoimmune disease." - "Five and a half times risk for neurodevelopmental disorders." - "Two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities." - "We found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall two point five fold increase in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination."

Impact of childhood vaccination on short and long term chronic health outcomes in children, a birth cohort study. 18,468 subjects. The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis. Six hundred percent more acute and chronic ear infections. Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Five and a half times risk. Six hundred and sixteen percent increase. Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities. This paper should have been rushed to publication on an emergency basis. This may be the most important study that has ever been done and it needs to be published. Zervos probably gonna lose his job over this.

The speaker analyzed office visits, stratifying patients by the number of vaccines received. The study included over 500 unvaccinated and over 3,700 vaccinated individuals. The data revealed that more vaccines correlated with worse health outcomes over a ten-and-a-half-year period. Specifically, the speaker claims that increased vaccination was associated with higher rates of infections, ADD/ADHD, neurodevelopmental issues, eczema, allergies, and anemia. According to the speaker, these negative correlations were observed when comparing vaccinated individuals to the unvaccinated group. The speaker states that within five days of the data being available online, the Oregon Medical Board suspended their license on December 3, 2020, citing them as a threat.

Impact of childhood vaccination on short and long term chronic health outcomes in children, a birth cohort study. 18,468 subjects. The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis. Six hundred percent more acute and chronic ear infections. Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Five and a half times risk. Six hundred and sixteen percent increase. Learning issues, developmental delays, speech delays, language delays. Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities. None. It's a big difference. This is devastating. This is an inconvenient study for the entire vaccine agenda. If he puts his name on this, his career is over.

The transcript follows a documentary-style examination of rising chronic illness in American children and a contested view of vaccine safety and testing. It weaves together personal testimonies, investigative reporting, and expert interviews to present a narrative that vaccines may be linked to widespread health problems and that the safety science behind vaccination is insufficient or flawed in certain respects. Key claims about child health trends - A diverse set of pediatric health issues is described as increasingly common: ADHD, allergies, eczema, psoriasis, autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile diabetes, lupus, Crohn’s disease), IBS, sleep disorders, seizures, and neurological conditions. Several speakers list multiple conditions affecting children, suggesting a broad chronic disease trend. - A striking statistic cited: “More than forty percent of American children now have at least one chronic health condition” (Speaker 5). Relatedly, autism rates are described as rising from “one in ten thousand” decades ago to “one in thirty one” today (Speaker 5). - An overarching contention is that these rapid increases are unlikely to be explained by genetics alone, given the relatively fast pace of change in incidence. The central study and the “hidden” narrative - The documentary frames a study led by a scientist who allegedly conducted research into chronic disease and vaccination but chose not to publish due to fear of repercussions. Hidden-camera investigations and interviews are used to explore why such data might remain unpublished and how the medical establishment responds to dissenting findings. - The film positions Dr. Zervos (Marcus Zervos), an infectious disease expert at Henry Ford Health System, as a pivotal figure who agreed to a vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated study but reportedly did not publish the results, leading the filmmakers to pursue further inquiry with him and others. Vaccines, safety testing, and the placebo question - A core claim is that vaccines have not undergone the gold standard of safety testing: double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials for the entire childhood schedule. The film argues that no childhood vaccine has completed such a trial prior to licensure. - The hepatitis B vaccine (Recombivax HB) is used as an example: its pre-licensure safety data reportedly cover only five days after each dose, with no long-term control group, and section 6.1 of the insert notes five days of safety monitoring, raising questions about detecting longer-term autoimmune or neurological injuries. - Opposing voices acknowledge ethical constraints around placebo trials in the presence of existing vaccines, but the documentary challenges this by pointing out that certain comparator trials (e.g., Prevnar 13 vs Prevnar 7) were not against saline placebo, and thus do not establish a safety baseline. - A recurring metaphor is the “whiskey study” scenario to illustrate how non-saline placebo comparisons can mislead safety conclusions. Retrospective and observational studies; the vaccine-safety signal - The film emphasizes retrospective and observational studies as alternatives to randomized trials, arguing they can reveal safety signals when prospective trials are unavailable. It highlights the Henry Ford Health System’s data as a major retrospective study: a vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated analysis based on a large, integrated health database. - According to the film, the Henry Ford study found that vaccinated children had higher risks across multiple chronic health categories. Specifically, ten years of follow-up suggested: - Vaccinated children were 2.5 times more likely to have a chronic health condition overall. - An approximate fourfold increased risk for chronic health conditions in certain analyses. - A 4.29-times higher risk for autism was not statistically significant due to small autism counts in the unvaccinated group, but substantial signals were observed in other neurodevelopmental outcomes. - The study reported markedly higher rates of autoimmune diseases (around six times higher) and various neurodevelopmental disorders in the vaccinated group compared with unvaccinated peers. - In the ten-year window, 57% of vaccinated children had a chronic health condition versus 17% of unvaccinated children. - The documentary notes methodological limitations common to retrospective studies, such as follow-up differences and confounding factors, but argues that sensitivity analyses did not overturn the main findings. The vaccine schedule, broader policy, and dissent within the medical community - The narrative asserts that a large portion of physicians publicly defend vaccines as safe and effective, with long-standing support for vaccination policies and mandates. Yet it also recounts stories of physicians who faced professional pushback, licensing actions, or public criticism after raising questions about vaccine safety or suggesting alternative research paths. - The film mentions the Institute of Medicine’s 2011 report, which stated that there were over 150 injuries likely associated with vaccines that had not been studied, and it notes that no large, randomized comparisons between fully vaccinated and fully unvaccinated populations had been published by major institutions (as of the report’s release). - The filmmakers recount efforts to obtain a definitive vaccination–unvaccinated study from Henry Ford and other institutions, with some figures expressing willingness to publish if the study clearly demonstrated that unvaccinated children fared better, while others face professional or political pressures. Vaccine advocacy versus safety concerns; the call for replication - Pro-vaccine voices in the film emphasize that vaccines have prevented millions of deaths and remain broadly safe, citing the historical success of vaccines and the large body of published research supporting vaccine effectiveness and safety. - Proponents of re-examination advocate replicating retrospective cohort analyses in other large health systems (e.g., Kaiser Permanente, Harvard Pilgrim, CDC’s VSD) to test whether similar patterns emerge. They stress the ethical and scientific necessity of replication to determine whether the observed signals hold across populations. - The film closes with a call for replication and transparency: if the data are robust, publishing them could transform the understanding of off-target and non-specific effects of vaccination. If replicated, such studies could reshape how vaccines are administered and studied. The documentary also threads personal stories of vaccine injury, including cases of severe reactions after various vaccines and the emotional and logistical toll on families. It juxtaposes these individual tragedies with the broader debate over vaccine safety research, urging readers to consider the evidence, replication, and the possibility that current vaccine safety paradigms may require reassessment.

The speaker discusses various studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. One study found that vaccinated children had higher rates of nasal allergy, allergic rhinitis, autism, pneumonia, and ear infections compared to unvaccinated children. Another study examined medical records and found that vaccinated children had more developmental delays, asthma, and ear infections. The speaker also mentions the challenges faced in getting these studies published and the scrutiny they faced from fact-checkers. Additionally, the speaker highlights the impact of breastfeeding on vaccination outcomes, noting that not breastfeeding for at least 6 months increased the risk of asthma, allergies, eczema, developmental delays, and autism in vaccinated children.

Study: Impact of childhood vaccination on short and long term chronic health outcomes in children, a birth cohort study. 18,468 subjects. 'The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis.' 'Six hundred percent more acute and chronic ear infections.' 'Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated.' 'Five and a half times risk. Six hundred and sixteen percent increase.' 'Learning issues, developmental delays, speech delays, language delays.' 'Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities.' 'This is devastating.' 'This is an inconvenient study for the entire vaccine agenda.'

An expert conducted a study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated patients in a medical practice. The results showed that vaccinated children had higher rates of asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema, sinusitis, gastroenteritis, respiratory infections, otitis media, conjunctivitis, breathing issues, and behavioral issues like ADD and ADHD. The speaker mentions that vaccines may shift the immune system towards allergy and autoimmunity, leading to more infections. The speaker also claims that the medical board revoked their license in response to this study. They argue that the association between vaccines and health issues is not a coincidence, citing other studies and explaining the mechanism of action involving aluminum.

"This study was based on actual medical records." "What these researchers found was that vaccinated children had four point two nine times the rate of asthma, three point zero three times the rate of atopic disease, five point nine six times the rate of autoimmune disease, and five point five three times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, which included three point two eight times the rate of developmental delay, and four point four seven times the rate of speech disorder." "After ten years, seventeen percent of the unvaccinated children had a chronic health issue, while fifty seven percent of the vaccinated children had at least one chronic health issue." "The only real problem with this study and why it didn't get submitted for publication is that its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe." "We can protect children from infectious disease, and we can protect children from vaccine harms."

Speaker 0 asserts that the MMR and MMR V vaccines have been linked to two thousand six hundred percent more deaths than measles infection since 1995. The speaker claims that, over the past thirty years, the MMR shots have killed far more children than measles, identifying hundreds of infants and toddlers who died after these shots, often from SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome, cardiac arrest, seizures, and encephalitis. The speaker states that most of these deaths occurred within about two weeks after the shot, with forty percent dying within one week. The deaths are described as temporally linked to the vaccination, with the majority of fatalities occurring at ages one to one and a half, which the speaker notes as the time they receive the MMR shots. The speaker claims that twenty-five percent of these deaths were classified as sudden infant death syndrome. The overall claim is that these shots are killing the babies in their sleep, described as absolutely disturbing and as part of a broader study. The speaker concludes that the shots are deadly and that the MMR and MMRV shots should not be given anymore; if parents still want them, they should be split up rather than administered as a combined dose, labeling the current approach as “the full load of garbage.”

Speaker 0 argues that, when re-examining the data from the original study, the raw numbers reveal a different pattern than what the study’s modeling suggested. Specifically, they state that, in the raw proportions, every single one of the 22 chronic disease categories was proportionally higher in the vaccinated group. This includes cancer, which the study reportedly treated as a control condition and claimed there was no difference for. According to Speaker 0, the study’s use of cancer as a control is at odds with the raw data they observed. They claim that there was a difference in cancer outcomes, contrary to the study’s implication of no difference. They emphasize that, with rare outcomes, the modeling employed in the original analysis is not very reliable, and as a result, the study did not perform any basic proportional analysis. Speaker 0 states that when they performed a basic proportional analysis themselves, cancer was fifty-four percent higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated children. They mention that this result is “explained biologically” and assert that there is biological plausibility behind it. Key points: - Raw proportions show all 22 chronic disease categories higher in the vaccinated group, including cancer. - The original study used cancer as a control and claimed no difference, which Speaker 0 disputes based on the raw data. - Modeling for rare outcomes is described as not very reliable. - A basic proportional analysis by Speaker 0 indicates cancer is 54% higher in the vaccinated group versus the unvaccinated. - A biological explanation or plausibility is asserted for the observed cancer difference in the vaccinated group.