reSee.it - Related Video Feed

There are weapons being developed to target specific individuals by using their DNA and medical profiles. This raises concerns about privacy, especially in terms of commercial data protection. Over the past 20 years, expectations of privacy have diminished, particularly among younger generations. People willingly provide their DNA to companies like 23andMe, which then own and can potentially sell this data without sufficient intellectual property or privacy safeguards. The lack of legal and regulatory frameworks to address these issues is a problem. It is crucial to have an open and public political discussion about how to protect healthcare information, DNA data, and personal data, as adversaries may exploit this information for developing such weapon systems.

23andMe is mentioned, prompting a warning against using their services due to data selling practices. It is claimed that 23andMe sells user data to other entities, including Russia. Nathaniel Johnson, a policy advisor for the U.S. Department of the Treasury, is introduced. The claim is made that 23andMe's contract contains a clause allowing them to share information with shareholders, some of whom are pharmaceutical companies based in other countries. These foreign pharmaceutical companies are allegedly owned by entities such as the Ministry of Defense in Russia or are based in China.

But once you can probabilistically and through modeling, be able to much better see what's going to happen. Take for example, the fact that we already can start to see signs of Alzheimer's many, many decades potentially before a person starts to manifest the condition. Do they want to know? And if they don't want to know, should other people have the ability to know? Should an insurance company be able to make choices about whether to cover them? Should an employer have access to that information to make decisions about whether or not they auto, auto employ?

A senator questions a 23andMe representative about their data privacy policies, specifically regarding the sale of consumer data. The senator claims the company's privacy statement says they cannot share information without consent, yet they are selling it. The representative states customers can delete their data anytime, even after the sale. The senator points out that the deletion page went down after the sale announcement. The representative claims the issue was fixed and customers can now delete their data. However, the senator reads from 23andMe's privacy policy, which states the company retains genetic information, date of birth, and sex even after account deletion. The representative initially denies retaining genetic information, but then admits to retaining name, email address, and other data. The senator accuses the company of not allowing consumers to permanently delete their data and lying to them. The senator concludes that 23andMe controls consumer data and is violating its promises.

Every day, just the 1% of the cells of your DNA that gets replicated stretches from here to the sun four times. If you're to line it up end by end, that's very hard to conceptualize. But it should give you a little bit of humility before you go and start monkeying with it with these vaccines that can actually alter your DNA. And that's what I'm gonna show you. Is that the vaccines had a DNA contamination in them that didn't tell you about that could in fact alter your genome. Alright? These people are vibe coding your genome. And this is a major attack surface to the human gene pool because if this thing starts to alter the lifespan of people, it's going to part you with your Bitcoin. You're gonna end up spending money in a fiat system that has no controls, has no liability, and ends up oftentimes inducing mandates to get what it wants done. Many people had have peer have gone and replicated this work. It happened on Twitter. It did not happen very quickly in the peer review system. The peer review system kinda kicked it out. Some of these papers have now been peer reviewed, but it took years for them to come to this conclusion. Now, the FDA, the EMA and the TGA have all admitted that this mistake has happened. How did it happen? There's a big bait and switch. Pfizer actually ran the trial of 22,000 people on the process on the left and after they got to the trial, they then switched to the process on the right and didn't retrial the drug. And in doing so, they left a tremendous amount of excess DNA behind in the product. So all of the vaccine efficiency numbers you've heard in the news are flawed. They're not real because that's not what actually went into the trial. What went to the public was actually something that came out of this process too. It's published now in the BMJ that this fraud happened and no one has yet been prosecuted for it. So what did they leave in there? What they left in there was something we know from the polio scandal. If you're not familiar with the polio scandal, that polio vaccines were also contaminated with something known as SV40 and it created a massive cancer wave. Now the whole virus isn't in these vaccines, but there is a very curious part of this called the SV40 region that Pfizer intentionally removed from the disclosure that they gave to the FDA. So the FDA has admitted that this SV40 material is in there. They did not spell this out to the regulators. The regulators did not find them and they're actually running cover for them saying this DNA is too little consequence to matter, it's too small, and it's not functional. But we know it's functional because Dean et al has published that this piece of DNA drives DNA straight to the nucleus. It gets used in gene therapy vectors.

DNA companies are issuing warnings that your personal information can be sold and weaponized against you. It is claimed that someone's DNA and medical profile can be used to target a biological weapon that will kill that person. People are sending their DNA to companies like 23 and Me to get data about their background, but their DNA is now owned by a private company and can be sold off. There needs to be a public discussion about protecting healthcare and DNA information because this data will be collected by adversaries to develop these systems.

A committee hearing is addressing privacy and national security concerns surrounding 23andMe's bankruptcy. 23andMe, a direct-to-consumer genetic testing company, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, raising concerns about who will gain access to sensitive customer data. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals initially entered an agreement to acquire 23andMe, but the auction was reopened. Concerns exist regarding the storage, usage, and potential access by foreign adversaries to this private information, especially given 23andMe's past funding from investors linked to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Regeneron's partnership with a Chinese company also raises questions. The CCP's history of mass surveillance, bioweapon activities, and misuse of genetic data, including the hacking of 23andMe in 2023, are highlighted. In 2019, the Department of Defense warned military members against using consumer DNA kits due to security risks. Potential harm includes misuse by foreign actors, higher insurance premiums, credit restrictions, and targeted advertising. The committee seeks to understand how 23andMe will ensure the safety of Americans' genetic data and is hearing from 23andMe representatives.

A committee hearing is addressing privacy and national security concerns regarding 23andMe's bankruptcy. 23andMe, a direct-to-consumer genetic testing company, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, raising questions about who will access customers' sensitive genetic data. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals initially entered an agreement to acquire 23andMe, but the auction was reopened to allow bids from Regeneron and TTAM Research. Concerns exist regarding the storage, usage, and potential access by foreign adversaries to this private information, especially given 23andMe's past funding from investors, including WuXi Healthcare Ventures, linked to the CCP. Regeneron's partnership with a Chinese company, Xi Lab Ltd, is also noted. 23andMe was hacked in 2023, exposing nearly 7,000,000 profiles, mostly targeting Jewish and Chinese customers. The Department of Defense previously warned military members against using consumer DNA kits due to security risks. Potential harms include misuse by foreign actors, higher insurance premiums, credit restrictions, and targeted advertising. The committee seeks to understand how to ensure the safety of Americans' genetic data from Ann Wojciechie and Joseph Selzavage.

The speaker discusses how the CIA uses Google to gather personal and biometric information, including DNA data from organizations like 23andme and ancestry.com. They warn against providing DNA information as it can be accessed by the CIA and Department of Defense. They mention the ARPA H program, an offshoot of the DOD's total information awareness program, which aims to collect medical information for both the CIA and DOD. The speaker emphasizes that we are now in the surveillance age and nothing we do is private.

There are claims that a piece of DNA has been inserted into everyone's genome without their knowledge, but who did it and why? It may sound like science fiction, but the facts can't be discounted. They're tampering with our DNA and are able to shut down our immune systems. It's a widespread failure of our immune systems through gene tampering. A virus within a virus put there through the smallpox vaccine that removes the adenosine deaminase gene from your DNA. This is called the Spartan virus, and it uses a process called CRISPR Cas nine. It's the ultimate weapon, the ability to depopulate the planet by tampering with their DNA through gene editing. Our own government lies as a matter of policy and hoards technology at the expense of human life with a darker objective: the takeover of America and then the world by any means necessary. The government collects your data and monitors your whereabouts with impunity, and it's happening all around us.

DNA companies are under scrutiny for potentially selling and weaponizing personal DNA information. It is claimed that a person's DNA and medical profile could be used to target them with a biological weapon. Concerns are raised about individuals willingly submitting their DNA to companies like 23 and Me, resulting in private companies owning and potentially selling that data. It is argued that open discussions are needed regarding the protection of healthcare and DNA information. The speaker asserts that adversaries could procure and collect this data to develop harmful systems.

The speaker presents a critical, conspiratorial view of Joe Rogan’s podcast and the broader ecosystem around Rogan, arguing that Rogan’s success is driven by corporate and cultural agendas rather than organic content. The core claim is that Rogan functions as a pivotal asset for information-age influence, with a web of sponsors, investors, and associated figures who push a planned “brave new world” through technology, medicine, and media. Key sponsors, connections, and networks are highlighted: - Cash App is noted as a major sponsor, with the presenter looping in a broader network that includes Jack Dorsey; but the presentation also emphasizes lesser-known sponsors and their influence. - 23andMe is described as a significant sponsor. The presenter identifies 23andMe as co-founded and owned by Ann Wajarski and notes her family connections to Susan Wajarski (CEO of YouTube) and Sergey Brin (Google cofounder), connecting the company to a larger tech and governance milieu. The claim is that Rogan promoted 23andMe for health-risk data, implying a broader agenda behind the database. - Esther Dyson is singled out as a 23andMe board member who is involved in private aviation, commercial space startups, healthcare, and genetics. Dyson is described as a founder of Space Angels Networks and an investor in XCOR, Constellation Services, Zero Icon Aircraft, Space Adventures, and Mars One. Mars One is labeled a scam, used as part of a broader pattern of commercial and privatized space funding within Rogan’s circle. - The broader claim is that commercial privatization of space is a recurring motif in Rogan’s network, serving as a funnel for money to support other movements and agendas, including information-age assets like Rogan. Elon Musk is discussed as a de facto sponsor, though not listed as an official sponsor. The speaker recounts a clip where a participant says, “I just got a Tesla,” interpreting it as a sign that Elon Musk is subsidizing Rogan’s content. The Musk-Rogan connection is tied to the Neuralink brain-implant agenda and the broader promotion of brain-computer interfaces. A 2019 Rogan podcast clip is cited where mind-reading, read-thought, and universal language concepts are discussed as inevitabilities, with the claim that Rogan promoted Neuralink long before Musk’s public push. The speaker argues Rogan’s discussions around mind-reading and brain-computer interfaces constitute an agenda to normalize these technologies. Third-wave/information-age themes are emphasized as part of a long-running agenda: - The speaker connects Rogan’s content to Alvin Toffler’s Third Wave, information overload, and the idea that the “future shock” of rapid change has been anticipated since 1980. The term “information overload” is linked to a broader “problem-reaction-solution” framework, aimed at enabling a “brave new world.” - The “bigger plan” is discussed through the lens of the “centrist unifying movement” and a narrative where technology, plant-based medicines, and new solutions to big pharma are framed as miraculous, but also as forms of social control. On the Onnit/Aubrey Marcus axis: - Onnit is presented as another layer of this network, with Aubrey Marcus described as founder and CEO of Onnit, and the brand as a hub for connections to Rogan and other Rosetta-stone players. Onnit’s leadership is associated with Pentagon and DARPA ties, and with Jan Irvin’s framing as an agent connected to the Soros network. - The speaker describes allegations of sexual coercion and other controversies around Aubrey Marcus and, more broadly, accuses a “shell-company” network (Aubrey Marcus’s father Michael Marcus; multiple name changes; alleged oil ventures) of enabling scams and profits in ways that intersect with the Rogan network. - The Brain-Force/Alpha Brain marketing and other Rogan-endorsed supplements are discussed as part of Rogan’s monetized ecosystem, including alleged parallels between Brain Force and Alpha Brain. MAPS, Hefner Institute, and the psychedelic-medication axis: - MAPS (Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies) is described as Rockefeller-funded and linked to the Hefner Institute; the speaker accuses MAPS of promoting psychedelics under the cover of medical benefits, while being connected to George Soros, the Pratzker family, and Steve Wozniak’s Esselin associations. - The promotion of psychedelics (LSD, psilocybin, MDMA) is presented as a strategic tool used by corporate interests to reframe social norms and to push regulatory changes, with the implication that Rogan gave platform to MAPS-related talking points after Rogan started working with MAPS affiliates. The Esselin Institute and related mind-war concepts: - The Esselin Institute (Big Sur) is described as a key locus for the development of thought-architecture, social engineering, and mind-war concepts. Founders Michael Murphy and Dick Pierce are cited, with links to Aldous Huxley, Alan Watts, Timothy Leary, Terrence McKenna, Rick Doblin, and Robert Anton Wilson as figures associated with the institute. - The presenter argues that Esselin served as a Troika-like hub bridging the Soviet influence with Western technologists, including alleged track-two diplomacy and exchanges between Soviet cosmonauts and American scientists, which supposedly seeded “mind war” and information-warfare concepts later manifested in contemporary media and technology ecosystems. - The claim is that many Rogan-circle figures, including Joe Rogan, Tim Berners, and Bruce Damer, share a lineage of influence traced back to Esselin’s “mind-war” research and its intersection with Pentagon and intelligence communities. The presenter closes by asserting that Rogan’s operations, including production via Jamie (Rogan’s producer), are part of a broader intelligence-cum-corporate project. The podcast is framed as an operation rather than purely organic content, with a wide network of actors—tech billionaires, investment groups, secret intelligence connections, and think tanks—working in concert to push a centralized agenda: a Brave New World with centralized control, a universal basic income, mass privatization of medicine and space, and a new social order steered by a set of interconnected elites. The overall aim of the presentation is to reveal and emphasize these interlocking sponsorships, corporate ties, and ideological threads as the backbone of Rogan’s influence, arguing that what appears as spontaneity on Rogan’s platform is, in fact, orchestrated through a network of corporate, political, and intelligence-connected actors and ideas.

Retired FBI Agent discusses the privacy concerns surrounding home DNA test kits. He highlights a case where a detective obtained a court order to search over a million records in a DNA database. He questions whether health insurance companies would use this information to make coverage decisions. Even if privacy measures are in place, the risk of hacking or acquisition by a company with different values remains. While acknowledging the desire to find birth parents, the speaker personally opts out of using these kits.

Some shady shit has been going on with my AncestryDNA results. I've got to show you how they've been changing over time. When I first did the test, my results told me 45% Levant, which makes sense because I am Palestinian. And when I broke down my results, my dad contributed 25% of that Levant DNA. I also got my dad tested and his results had 50% Levant. Fast forward to now, where they've updated their database again, is in theory supposed to make your results more accurate. They're telling me that I'm now only 21% Levant and that my dad is contributing 0% Levant to my DNA. They've changed him from 50% to 22% Levant. And suddenly, he's got all of this extra Arabian Peninsula in him, which is quite fitting because when you hear Zionists spew propaganda, they love to say that Palestinians are not native to the land and that we all are Arabs that came from the Arabian Peninsula. AncestryDNA is owned by Blackstone. And who's calling the shots at Blackstone? This guy, Steven Schwarzman. And he just so happens to credit a trip to Israel for inspiring his entrepreneurial spirit. He's also the kind of guy that will spend money to push his agenda. In this article by the New York Post, they talk about how he was said to be using both his clout and very thick wallet to fund a counter offensive to the anti Israel protests at Yale. Thankfully, I wasn't using AncestryDNA to learn about my ethnicity. I already know I'm fucking Palestinian. I used them to get a DNA file that I could upload onto other websites and learn about my ancient ancestry. From all the way back to the Bronze Age, my DNA ties me to the land of Palestine and The Levant more than anywhere else in the world. Canaanites are my number one match for the Bronze Age, then Phoenicians in the Iron Age, then The Levant again during late antiquity, and then again during the Middle Ages. And when you look at my dad's results, he scores even higher for The Levant. So fuck Ancestry and their bullshit results. I've officially deleted my DNA and my dad's DNA from their website. Those bastards are not gonna have my info anymore. Lord knows what they're doing with our DNA results anyway. Freaks me out. Please don't give them your DNA and please don't give them your money.

23andMe is mentioned, prompting a warning against using their services due to data selling practices. It is claimed that 23andMe sells user data to other entities, including Russia. Nathaniel Johnson, a policy advisor for the U.S. Department of the Treasury, is introduced. The claim is made that 23andMe's contract includes a clause allowing them to share information with shareholders, some of whom are pharmaceutical companies based in other countries. These foreign pharmaceutical companies are allegedly owned by entities like the Ministry of Defense in Russia or are based in China.

Some people are concerned about data mining and privacy issues, particularly with ChoicePoint, a company created by Republicans. ChoicePoint has access to vast amounts of personal data, including phone numbers, medical records, DNA, and more. They have been involved in controversial activities, such as providing inaccurate voter lists in Florida and falsifying DNA evidence in rape cases. This privatized spy function raises constitutional concerns and blurs the line between government and private surveillance. George Orwell would find this situation concerning.

We don't know the long-term effects of modifying people's DNA and RNA. Facebook announced they are expanding efforts to remove false claims about COVID-19 vaccines, including claims that the vaccine changes people's DNA. However, a leaked tape shows Zuckerberg, the CEO of Facebook, violating his own policy by saying the vaccine modifies people's DNA. This statement would get him banned from Facebook.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about the company's data deletion policy, specifically how long it takes and whether the data is permanently deleted. Speaker 1 states that genetic data is typically deleted automatically within 30 days and is gone forever. Speaker 0 then quotes the company's privacy statement, which says that the company retains genetic information, date of birth, and sex even after an account is deleted. Speaker 1 initially denies retaining genetic information but then admits to retaining some information, such as name and email address, but not genetic information. Speaker 0 reiterates that the privacy policy states the company retains genetic information, date of birth, and sex even after account deletion.

This discussion outlines the convergence of neuroscience, nanotechnology, and artificial intelligence as potential weapons and the profound privacy, security, and ethical implications that follow. It covers both technical capabilities and the social-political responses being proposed or enacted. - Nanomaterials and neuromodulation: The talk highlights the use of nanoparticulate agents and aerosolizable nanomaterials that can be breathed in to disrupt blood flow and neurological network activity, potentially used as enclosed weapons or to cause broader disruption. It also describes the capacity to deploy nanomaterials to deliver electrodes into a head to create vast arrays of sensors and transmitters. DARPA’s N3D program (Next Generation Non-Invasive Neuromodulation) aims to create implantable electrode arrays that read from and write into the brain remotely in real time without surgical implantation. - AI-enabled mind-reading and brain modification: Advances in artificial intelligence are described as enabling medical breakthroughs, including devices that can read minds and alter brain function to treat conditions like anxiety and Alzheimer's. This raises significant privacy concerns as brain data becomes more accessible and actionable. - Privacy laws and at-home monitoring: Colorado enacted a first-in-the-nation law to protect private brain data, treating it similarly to fingerprints under the state privacy act when used to identify people. The discussion notes that ear pods and similar devices can pick up brainwave activity to determine whether someone is paying attention or mind-wandering, and argues that it’s possible to infer what someone is paying attention to, not just whether they’re attentive. - Market availability and tech players: People can buy devices that decode brainwaves, and technologies from major companies (including Elon Musk, Apple, Meta, and OpenAI) are advancing capabilities to change, enhance, and control thoughts, emotions, and memories. Brain waves can be treated as encrypted signals; AI has identified frequencies for specific words to turn thought into text, leading to the perception that AI can know what someone is thinking. - Data privacy risks and uses: There are concerns about data from brain monitoring being used by insurers, law enforcement, and advertisers, with governments potentially entering brains to alter thoughts, emotions, or memories as the technology evolves. A Neuro Rights Foundation study is cited, noting that two-thirds of brain-data–collecting companies share or sell data with third parties, frequently without disclosure about storage, access, or security breaches. Pazoski, the foundation’s medical director, champions privacy protections as urgently needed. - Surveillance and prevention: The conversation touches on the broader societal impact, including workplace surveillance (“bossware”) and the precision of attention monitoring when coupled with software and surveillance tools. EarPods capable of attention detection are discussed as a pivotal example of ubiquitous monitoring. - Potential for misuse and sociopolitical risk: There are questions about whether devices can control thoughts, with examples of mice in labs and the broader potential for coercive manipulation or “Manchurian candidate” scenarios. The possibility of stealthy, remote brain targeting without visible entry or exit points is highlighted as a particularly dangerous capability. - Security and governance concerns: Participants emphasize the need to stay ahead of misuse, with concerns about covert weapons, the speed of development (potentially faster than anticipated), and the risk of hacking or weaponization. The discussion includes references to Havana syndrome, direct energy weapons, and the difficulty of proving brain-based manipulation in real-world cases. The overall tone stresses that as neurotechnology accelerates, governance, transparency, and robust privacy protections are essential.

We don't know the long-term effects of modifying people's DNA and RNA. Facebook announced they are expanding their efforts to remove false claims about COVID-19 vaccines. They specifically mentioned removing content that claims the vaccine changes people's DNA. However, a leaked tape of Zuckerberg, the CEO of Facebook, shows him saying that the vaccine basically modifies people's DNA. This contradicts Facebook's policy, and if Zuckerberg had said this on the platform, he would be censored.

China has obtained the genomic sequence of every person in the US who has undergone gene typing. They are using this information to develop bioweapons that specifically target Caucasians. Chinese companies, such as BGI, dominate the genomic sequencing industry in the US. There is evidence suggesting that the COVID-19 virus originated from a lab in Wuhan, China, and was created through gene splicing and gain of function research. China has publicly discussed their interest in using advanced pathogenetic capabilities for warfare. The export of American genetic information to China is a significant concern, as it could be used to develop genetic weapons that target specific populations based on their genetic variations.

We don't fully understand the long-term effects of modifying DNA and RNA. Recently, Facebook announced it would remove false claims about COVID-19 vaccines, specifically those suggesting the vaccine changes DNA. However, a leaked tape reveals Mark Zuckerberg stating that the vaccine modifies DNA, which contradicts Facebook's own policy. This statement would likely result in censorship on the platform today. The concern remains about the implications of such modifications and the unknown long-term side effects.

Weapons are being developed to target specific individuals using their DNA and medical profiles. This raises privacy concerns, especially with the degradation of privacy expectations over the last twenty years. People willingly submit their DNA to companies like 23 and Me, resulting in private companies owning and potentially selling their DNA with minimal privacy protection. Current legal and regulatory systems are inadequate to address this. An open, public, and political discussion is necessary to determine how to protect healthcare information, DNA, and personal data, as adversaries will collect this data to develop these targeted weapon systems.

Speaker 1 advises against using 23andMe because they allegedly sell user information. Speaker 1 claims this data is sold not only to the US but also potentially to other countries, including Russia. Speaker 1 suggests some pharmaceutical companies that purchase this data are based in countries like Russia and may be owned by entities such as the Ministry of Defense.

A member of the House Intelligence Committee, Congressman Jason Crow, has warned against using DNA testing services, stating that private companies could potentially use the collected material to develop bioweapons targeting individuals. While this may sound like something out of a James Bond movie, it is a concern due to the CRISPR gene editing technology, which makes it easier to create targeted bioweapons. One such company, 23andMe, is an American-owned California company that trades on the Nasdaq but has a Chinese investor. There are concerns about the transparency of data sharing with China. US officials worry about the lack of regulation and transparency surrounding the movement of medical data, as well as China's strategy of gathering biological data for various purposes.