TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker clarifies a headline, stating that three US citizen children (ages four, seven, and two) were not deported. Their mothers, who were in the US illegally, were deported, and the children accompanied them. The speaker asserts that if the children are US citizens, they can return to the US if their father or someone else wants to care for them. The speaker claims the US does not have a policy to deport children, even US citizens, without due process. The speaker explains that if someone is in the US unlawfully and has a young child, the parent can choose to take the child with them upon deportation. Alternatively, they can leave the child in the US. The speaker suggests the children likely have fathers in the US and that the family decides where the children go. The US deported the mothers who were illegally in America.

An individual, a citizen of El Salvador, was illegally in the U.S. and was returned to his country, which is standard deportation procedure. The foreign policy of the U.S. is conducted by the president, not by a court. The Supreme Court stated that no court has the authority to compel a foreign policy function in the U.S. The speaker claims that President Trump's policy is to expel foreign terrorists who are here illegally. The speaker asks why it isn't stated that keeping criminals out of the country is a positive thing, and accuses the previous speaker of lacking credibility.

The speaker states that they are not saying the organization lost 85,000 children, but that contact was lost with them and their whereabouts are unknown. The speaker asks if that is a fair statement. The speaker asks if, after making three calls on average to check on 85,000 children placed by the organization, there was no response. The speaker then asks if it is fair to say that contact was lost with over 85,000 kids. The speaker asks for a yes or no answer. The speaker states that the organization does not know where 85,000 of the children are. The speaker then says they will move on after receiving no answer.

The Trump administration is reportedly forcing children as young as four years old to represent themselves in court due to the elimination of legal assistance programs for undocumented children. A judge is quoted as saying the government wants these children to lead the United States. During one court hearing, a seven-year-old boy in a pizza shirt, an eight-year-old girl, and her four-year-old sister with a plush toy appeared without parents or attorneys, assisted only by shelter workers. This is described as a new reality that will continue with further cuts. A full breakdown is available on Substack.

Entering the U.S. legally and ignoring a judge's deportation order are crimes. Choosing to have a U.S. citizen child while in the country illegally puts the family in a difficult position. The speaker claims they removed children with mothers who requested it, calling it a parental decision. The speaker argues that if they hadn't removed the children with their mothers, they would be accused of separating families. They assert that when a parent wants their child to go with them, they facilitate it, and that the parents, not the government, made the decision. The speaker then references Lincoln Riley and Rachel Moran, stating they will never see their children again, and concludes that the administration is doing the right thing.

The speaker criticizes the current system for losing track of 85,000 children. They argue that the focus should be on addressing the actual issue rather than creating fictional scenarios. They highlight the increase in unaccompanied children crossing the border since Democrats took charge, with only a brief decline during a Republican administration. The speaker emphasizes the need to reunite these children with their families and ensure their safety. They also question the whereabouts of the 85,000 children under the Biden administration.

The administration was asked about a man who was allegedly mistakenly deported to El Salvador. It was stated that the individual was illegally in the U.S. and that two immigration courts ruled in 2019 that he was a member of MS-13. Additional paperwork was needed, and it is up to El Salvador if they want to return him. The Supreme Court ruled that if El Salvador wants to return him, the U.S. would facilitate it by providing a plane. Because the individual is a citizen of El Salvador, it is arrogant for American media to suggest the U.S. would tell El Salvador how to handle their own citizens. Because Trump declared MS-13 a foreign terrorist organization, the individual was no longer eligible for immigration relief and had a valid deportation order. A district court judge tried to compel the administration to kidnap the citizen of El Salvador and fly him back, but the Supreme Court unanimously reversed the district court order. The ruling stated that if El Salvador sent the individual back to the U.S. at their discretion, the U.S. could deport him a second time. The U.S. does not have the power to return him, and they are not fond of releasing terrorists into the country. No court in the U.S. has a right to conduct the foreign policy of the U.S.

A family seeking asylum was arrested but later released with a court hearing date, which they attended. This is the first time in US history that asylum seekers must apply in another country. President Trump argues that the catch and release policy is flawed, as dangerous individuals could enter the country. He claims that less than 1% of released individuals return, and only those with low IQ might come back. Vice President Biden disagrees, stating that the president's claims are untrue and encourages fact-checking.

Speaker 1 confirmed signing a memo but denied being the author of the family separation policy. Speaker 1 stated they gave Secretary Nielsen numerous recommendations on how to secure the border and save lives. Speaker 2 claimed that Speaker 1 recommended family separation as option three. Speaker 1 stated they recommended zero tolerance, the same as when any US citizen parent gets arrested with a child. Speaker 2 stated that legal asylees are not charged with any crime. Speaker 1 stated that being in the country illegally is a violation and that if one wants to seek asylum, they should do it the legal way at the port of entry. Speaker 1 referred to a congresswoman as the dumbest ever to listen to congress.

An illegal alien from El Salvador, if returned to the U.S., would be arrested and deported again because there's no withholding order for a member of a foreign terrorist organization, and the gang he belongs to doesn't exist in El Salvador anymore. Even with a withholding order, he could be deported to a different country like Egypt. The speaker questions if the media knows the difference between a deportation order and a withholding order. A deportation order means a judge has ruled the individual must be deported and has no right to remain in the U.S. His only options are deportation to his home country or another country. The speaker claims the media seems to believe he could return to the U.S. and live there illegally, which is not an option. His only choices are to live in El Salvador or another country because he entered the country illegally.

Congressman Garcia was asked to react to breaking news from the ACLU in Louisiana about the deportation of two families, including mothers and their minor children, three of whom are US citizens aged two, four, and seven. One mother is pregnant. The families were reportedly arrested on Tuesday and Thursday and held incommunicado, with ICE allegedly refusing to respond to attorneys' and family members' attempts to contact them. One of the US citizen children reportedly suffers from metastatic cancer and was deported without medication or consultation with their physicians, despite ICE being notified of the child's urgent medical needs. Garcia stated it is sickening that US citizens are being deported, which is illegal and inhumane. He claims agents are rushing the process, denying due process, and sending US citizens to other countries. He urged people to bring attention to this issue, which he says concerns due process, the Constitution, and how the country treats people, whether citizens or those seeking help.

The speaker questions why media outlets like Virgin Media and RTE do not report on missing migrant children, suggesting potential sex trafficking. RTE journalists labeled the speaker as extreme and implied there is no issue with missing children. The speaker denies suggesting a state conspiracy but wants more attention on the welfare of migrant children. The truth of the matter is left for the audience to decide. Translation: The speaker questions why the media does not report on missing migrant children, suggesting potential sex trafficking. RTE journalists labeled the speaker as extreme and implied there is no issue with missing children. The speaker denies suggesting a state conspiracy but wants more attention on the welfare of migrant children. The truth of the matter is left for the audience to decide.

The speakers discuss the policy of zero tolerance, which includes family separation. Speaker 1 argues that zero tolerance is necessary and compares it to situations where parents are arrested with their children. Speaker 0 points out that legal asylum seekers are not charged with any crime. Speaker 1 argues that seeking asylum should be done through legal channels. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 acknowledging the statement.

Democrats and the media have portrayed deported individuals as innocent, such as a supposed father of three who was actually an MS-13 gang member. An immigration judge determined in 2019 that this person had no right to be in the U.S., also noting traffic violations and missed court dates. The speaker asserts that the individual was an illegal alien who broke laws to enter the country, and that even left-wing media didn't criticize the deportation itself, only the reasoning behind it. The speaker states that the administration does not seek permission from Democrats to deport illegal immigrants. The speaker questions why Democrats are supposedly angrier about deporting violent gang members than they are about the victims of those gang members, suggesting they have lost touch with reality.

Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee just voted to allow Donald Trump to deport US citizens. Every single Republican voted in favor. The speaker expresses disbelief, stating they never thought they would see this happen. The speaker emphasizes that this is not about deporting unlawful violent immigrants, but about deporting US citizens.

The speaker challenges Mr. Breer's claim that intentional trauma was caused by the Trump administration's separation of children from their parents. They argue that it is unknown whether these individuals are the children's actual parents, and criticizes Mr. Breer for using the term "parents" in quotes. The speaker questions Mr. Breer's knowledge and suggests that the reason for family separation is to prevent child trafficking. The speaker, identifying as a mother, ends the conversation, accusing Mr. Breer of being destructive.

The speaker states they are illegal in the United States because of a paperwork error made after their grandmother's death. The speaker's father, who was processing the paperwork, mistakenly listed the speaker's grandmother as his mother. As a result, the speaker and their parents are considered undocumented immigrants in the U.S.

"Whoever you are, get ready and sleep with your eyes open." The speaker believes the administration would deport US citizens, stating, "Oh, hell yeah." They claim it's already happening and that it happened to them with two kids, ages two and four, who were with their mom. The mom was not a US citizen.

Speaker 0 questions the practicality of a mass deportation program, particularly concerning families with American-citizen children, suggesting a single negative image could halt the entire program. Speaker 1 acknowledges that deporting a woman with children, resulting in media coverage, would complicate the effort. Speaker 0 then asks for confirmation of support for mass deportation, "even of women and children." Speaker 1 responds that they will look at it very closely, noting that the deportation of even one "wrong person" could be exploited by the "radical left lunatics."

Speaker 0 asks how to console parents of young girls killed. Speaker 1 discusses crimes committed by undocumented individuals versus others, rejecting the term "illegal." Speaker 2 clarifies they do not use the term "illegal."

The speaker discusses the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland father, to El Salvador because he had tattoos. The speaker claims the Trump administration acknowledges the deportation was a mistake, but they are not working to bring him home. The Supreme Court said the Trump administration must facilitate but cannot effectuate his return. The speaker believes the administration is trying to make people forget about the situation, claiming they are giving no proof of life. The speaker questions what is stopping the administration from disappearing someone else in the future. The speaker anticipates some people on the right will call it liberal hysteria, but the speaker insists that Kilmar Abrego Garcia is a real human and father. The speaker expresses horror and disgust, advocating for empathy to make the country something worth aspiring towards.

The speaker criticizes MSDNC for spreading lies about family separation policies, claiming the Obama administration did not separate children from parents. The speaker dismisses the accusations as nonsense and tells MSDNC to leave.

A caller asked if the guest knew about Chinese maternity houses, where the Chinese government allegedly sends pregnant citizens in their seventh or eighth month to the US to give birth, after which they return to China with US citizen children who are raised loyal to China. The caller also questioned why a baby born in the US to a mother from Trendel Agua was not sent back with the mother. The guest responded that a mother is still a mother unless actively abusing the child. Regarding the first comment, the guest acknowledged the existence of a birth tourism industry where people pay to come to the US to give birth. He stated there is evidence that some countries, possibly including China, send people to the US to give birth so that those children can later claim US citizenship after living in their home countries for many years. He believes abuses like these led to President Trump's executive order.

The speaker states they were asked how they could smuggle a terrorist into the United States or return one to the United States. The speaker finds the question preposterous. They claim they don't know how they could smuggle someone into the U.S. and assert they lack the power to return anyone to the United States. The speaker states they are not going to do it.