reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 1 respects the right of people to vote for the president. However, it is questioned why, for the first time in American history, a president won every swing state while also being best friends with and having their largest donation from a man who owns and runs the Internet. It is hoped that this will be investigated to determine if it was an anomaly. It is curious, especially since Kamala Harris was filling up stadiums with supporters, while Donald Trump was not. As an American and believer in democracy, Speaker 1 hopes to look at all the reasons why this happened in the country.

The speakers discuss the legitimacy of various elections, including the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections. They express concerns about Russian interference, voter suppression, and irregularities with electronic voting machines. Some speakers believe that the election outcomes were affected and that the presidents were illegitimate. They mention specific cases like Bush vs. Gore in 2000 and the 2004 Ohio election. Stacey Abrams' loss in Georgia is also mentioned, with some speakers claiming that her election was stolen. Overall, the speakers question the fairness and integrity of these elections.

Late in the evening, six states that exit polls showed were going to carry suddenly veered off to Bush. Ohio then became the tipping point of the entire national election. There were tens of thousands of acts of irregularity. In a single precinct in Ohio, a total of 638 ballots were cast on election day. Bush received over 4,000 of them. Warren County is the last county in Ohio to come in with their vote totals, and they won't allow any witnesses in, won't allow any media in, and they say it's because of a homeland security threat. And yet the next day, we check with homeland security, they say we never spoke to anyone in Ohio. The function of the secretary of state's computer servers to report election results was moved during the night of the election from Ohio to servers in Chattanooga, Tennessee.

The transcript discusses concerns about election irregularities and voting machines. One speaker claims a voting machine subtracted votes, displaying a negative number. Another speaker states that such subtraction cannot occur accidentally and that someone consciously tried to steal votes. A third speaker says that when they press the button next to their name, another person's name appears on the display, questioning the accuracy of the vote count. Another speaker asserts that the machines are working correctly, recording votes accurately, and that the results will be accurate and reliable. One speaker expresses concern about private corporations controlling the voting system and calls for a formal debate about election irregularities, warning that the democracy and republic are at risk.

Miss Waters from California rises to object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral votes. The objection is in writing but not signed by a senator. The chair advises that the rules require a senator's signature. Miss Waters mentions gross violations of the voting rights act in Florida but acknowledges that the objection is not signed by a senator. The chair thanks Miss Waters but states that the point of order may not be received.

I witnessed numerous instances of irregularities during the election process. GOP challengers and I were not allowed to perform our duties properly, as Michigan laws require. Procedures were not followed, and our concerns were dismissed. We observed ballots being backdated and data being entered incorrectly. There have been many reports of voter fraud, including dead people voting. I have shared this information with Republican senators and representatives. The most important election in our history is at stake, and it is crucial for legislators to defend the constitution. Despite media claims, there is substantial evidence of widespread voter fraud. Time is of the essence.

The speaker questions the certification of the election results, stating that the margin of victory is less than 1%. They mention testimony from the secretary of state's counsel, who sent letters to 8,000 people who voted illegally, advising them not to vote in the US senate race. This number is almost three-fourths of the margin of victory. The speaker also points out that there is a 10% margin that is not accurate. They ask how the senate and house can stand by the certification.

I understand that many people have doubts about the last election, including myself. I want to address the concerns of millions of Americans regarding voting irregularities. I assure you that on Wednesday, we will have the opportunity to present our objections and evidence in Congress. However, it is important to focus on tomorrow, as it is Georgia's day.

The speaker claims to have personally witnessed a man inserting USB drives into voting machines on over 24 occasions, which they reported to a deputy sheriff and the clerk of elections. They were told that leaving USBs in voting machines is normal, but later learned this was not the case. The speaker alleges that 47 USB cards are now missing. They demanded that vote counts be updated live, and when they were, the count showed 50,000 votes, which they claim were for Vice President Biden. The speaker says they asked multiple law enforcement agencies to examine the computers for forensic evidence, but this was not done. The speaker further claims that chain of custody logs, records, and yellow sheets are gone, and that poll workers were invited to recreate the logs. They state there are 100,000 to 120,000 ballots in question and that there is no remedy for this regarding the presidential election. They do not believe anyone could certify the vote in good conscience.

I witnessed personally several egregious items. I was not allowed to perform my job, and from what I observed none of the GOP challengers were in accordance with Michigan laws. We were constantly prevented from getting close enough to see what was going on with respect to the ballots. Procedures were not being properly followed when we brought these to the attention of the supervisors. Our concerns were dismissed and ignored. We observed ballots being backdated from eleven four to eleven '2, and data being entered into the computers for these mail-in ballots. Poll workers were entering ballot information from new mail-in ballots including dates of birth of 01/01/1900 into the electronic poll books and processing those ballots for tabulation. The information was not entered wasn't in either the electronic poll book or the paper supplement book prior to that. There's been, lots and lots of reports after the election counting process. First of all, I did email a copy of what I'm reading from to each of Republican senators and the House of Representative members. So I'd be happy to provide this to you. Dead people were voting. I sent a website to that effect, and the list that they had up to that date was 17,327 randomly checked Michigan voters that were registered for voting and were above the age of 80. Every name on this list has voted in the twenty twenty election check for yourself and has also been found in one or more of the obituaries online. This is the most important election in my lifetime, and I think the most important election in the history of our republic. Every legislator, whether seated in the house or the senate, whether democrat or republican, took an oath to defend The US and state constitutions of, The US and Michigan against enemies both foreign and domestic. Time is of the essence and now is the time to fulfill that oath. Despite what the media is telling everyone, there are mountains of evidence that voter fraud occurred on a massive scale, the likes of which we've never witnessed in the country. Thirty seconds. For those

Miss Waters from California rises to object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral votes. The objection is in writing but not signed by a senator. The chair advises that a senator's signature is required. Miss Waters mentions gross violations of the Voting Rights Act in Florida, but the objection is still not signed by a senator. The chair thanks Miss Waters but states that the objection may not be received based on the previously stated point of order.

During the certification of the election results, Al Gore presided over the event as outgoing Vice President and President of the Senate. If a congressman wanted to object, they needed the signed support of one senator. One congressman objected, stating that the Supreme Court, not the people, decided the election. However, the objection was not signed by a senator. Another congressman from Arizona then objected, with the objection being in writing and signed by a senator. The video ends with a statement that President Trump was wrong in claiming the right to overturn the election.

- Speaker 0 asserts that mail-in ballots are corrupt and that a Republican-led effort will end mail-in ballots, including drafting an executive order by “the best lawyers in the country.” They claim the U.S. is nearly the only country using mail-in ballots and cite “massive fraud all over the place,” arguing that secure, paper-ballot elections with watermarking would produce faster results (claims that paper ballots provide results the same night, whereas machines allegedly take two weeks). - The conversation references a specific election night anomaly: a block of 138,000 votes (Speaker 1 and Speaker 2 confirm “138,000” votes) all reportedly voting for Biden with no Trump votes in that segment, described as inexplicable and not consistent with expected linear reporting. They note the timing as around 04:30–06:30 in the morning and suggest the results should not be linear given numerous counters reporting across states. They also complain that Nevada stopped counting mid-day, calling it inexplicable and illogical. - Speaker 4 claims a counting software glitch caused a 6,000-vote swing in a county, where ballots counted for Democrats were miscalculated for Republicans; she states that 47 counties use the same software. - Speaker 5 demonstrates concerns about voting-machine security: he shows how a bad actor could gain full admin access in under two minutes by opening a device, removing the card reader, and bypassing error messages, implying easy manipulation of tabulation in 18 states using the machine. - Speaker 6 describes observed ballot processing irregularities: a ballot-stuffing environment where ballots are stamped and filled in rapidly at the top of tickets, with security oversight present but gaps noted in workflow. - Speaker 7 discusses absentee/mail-in ballots with suspicions about sequence numbers: numbers appeared almost sequential, suggesting they could not be from mailed-in ballots, as mailed ballots typically arrive at different numbers; they note there was no date on envelopes and that some details would not be in poll books or the system, alleging irregularities in how ballots were handled. - Speaker 8 reports ongoing theft of duplicate ballots: a table for duplicates existed, but ballots were copied and redistributed at various tables, with duplicates not fully processed and ballots stashed under boxes; the speaker claims this occurred throughout the night. - Speaker 9 recounts a local media denial of fraud at the TCF center, contrasted with video obtained later showing a van delivering ballots after hours; she describes escort cars, a back-and-forth of ballots, and suggests the presence of unobserved ballots and a lack of witnesses during tabulation. She notes that the video was shared publicly and led to the suspension of a social-media account. - Speaker 10 provides a timeline from October 21, detailing a driver delivering mail-in ballots from New York to Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and then to Lancaster, with the driver faced hours of waiting, lack of slips, and unclear purpose for moving the load; the driver states that this was the only time he transported mail-in ballots and expresses a belief in the importance of honest elections for Americans.

The speaker claims they were prevented from adequately observing ballot procedures, and that supervisors dismissed their concerns. They allege ballots were backdated from November 4th to November 2nd, and that data was entered into computers for these mail-in ballots. According to the speaker, poll workers entered ballot information from new mail-in ballots, including dates of birth of 01/01/1900, into electronic poll books and processed those ballots for tabulation, even though the information was not previously in the electronic or paper supplement book. The speaker also claims to have emailed Republican senators and House representatives information about dead people voting, referencing a website listing 17,327 randomly checked Michigan voters over 80 who voted in the 2020 election and are listed in online obituaries. The speaker believes this is the most important election and urges legislators to fulfill their oath to defend the US and state constitutions, asserting there is massive evidence of voter fraud.

The speaker states that 37 votes were flipped from President Trump to former Vice President Biden in Ware County. This was discovered by Dr. Earl Martin, who provided certified election results and published hand count results as evidence. The elections director of Ware County confirmed this in writing. The speaker suggests a forensic examination of the machines, but the Secretary of State sent a letter prohibiting it.

Four years ago, there were concerns about uncounted votes in Illinois. A computing error in Franklin County gave extra votes to George Bush. This raises questions about the accuracy and integrity of our election system, not just in Ohio but also in other states. It is important to address these issues to maintain the legitimacy of our elections, especially when promoting democracy in other countries. The objection is raised in Ohio, but similar situations have occurred in Michigan and Arizona. This debate should continue to shed light on the irregularities observed. The golden rule of politics, treating others as you would like to be treated, should guide our actions regardless of the election outcome.

Key points from the testimonies: - There is a contention that ballots were run through the counting process multiple times, possibly thousands, with Speaker 0 noting statements that ballots could have been counted up to 30,000 times. When examining the poll book and comparing it to the votes cast, it is asked whether the numbers would align with the total votes from Detroit. - Speaker 2 asserts that the poll book is "completely off," with Speaker 3 estimating an error of over 100,000 in the poll book. A Downriver resident explains arriving at 3:40 a.m. due to 38,000 ballots that were “ride here” and “sitting over there and getting counted,” framing this as an eye-opening revelation about hypocrisy. - Security measures are described as unusual: Speaker 3 notes that windows are being taped up so challengers cannot see in, or out, raising questions about transparency. - Speaker 4 describes observing that none of the names on ballots were being scanned from the ballots into electronic poll books; instead, names appeared only on supplemental sheets. They note electronic poll books were updated on Sunday, November 1, implying that thousands of new ballots would have had to be registered on November 2 or 3. The speaker began writing down names after ballots were scanned but was obstructed by five individuals, including a poll worker, a supervisor, an uncredentialed person, a Democrat challenger, and a top ABCB leader, according to their affidavit. The speaker questions whether 30,000 to 40,000 new voters could have been legally signed up in two days. - Speaker 5 reports ballots that do not belong to anybody and do not appear in voter registration. They describe ballots with no names attached and note attempts to reevaluate them by placing them in a box. Multiple ballots show several different numbers. - Speaker 6 explains that, on the tables, ballots are accompanied by a computer screen showing which ballot it is. Sometimes a ballot has no name, but the registration file shows a person born in 1921 registered long before that year (1900), suggesting anomalies. The speaker asks what is wrong with being born in 1921, while Speaker 5 emphasizes a registration dating to 1900. - Speaker 7 lists egregious items: not allowed to perform duties, GOP challengers obstructed, procedures not followed, backdating ballots from November 4 to November 2, and data entered into computers for mail-in ballots with dates of birth like 01/01/1900, absent from electronic poll books or paper supplement books prior to that. They claim dead people were voting and reference a list of 17,327 Michigan voters over 80 who voted in 2020 and were found in obituaries online. This speaker calls the election described as the most important in their lifetime and in the republic’s history. - Representative Johnson is also mentioned, with a prompt to question the turnout rate, hinting at a purported turnout of 120%. Overall, the testimonies allege discrepancies between poll books and ballots, improper registration, backdated or misdated ballots, ballots lacking identifying information, obstructions to challengers, and possible participation of non-existent or deceased voters, culminating in claims of a highly irregular election process.

Representative Moe Brooks plans to challenge the election results on January 6th, claiming the House and Senate have the authority to reject electoral college votes from states with flawed election systems. Brooks believes that Donald Trump won if only lawful votes were counted. Brooks asserts that an honest voting system is the bedrock of a republic. He states he will object to submissions from states with flawed systems and needs a senator to join him to force a vote. He urges the American people to contact their representatives and demand they co-sponsor objections to flawed electoral college vote totals, or risk losing their vote. Brooks has not spoken with Republican leaders Kevin McCarthy or Mitch McConnell. He claims millions of illegal votes were cast, citing illegal aliens, non-citizens, and violations of article one section four of the United States constitution.

Four years ago, there were concerns about uncounted votes in Illinois. A computing error in Franklin County gave extra votes to George Bush. This raises questions about the accuracy and integrity of our election system, not just in Ohio but also in other states. It is important to address these issues to maintain the legitimacy of our elections, especially when promoting democracy in other countries. The objection is raised in Ohio, but similar situations have occurred in Michigan and Arizona. This debate should continue to shed light on the irregularities observed. The golden rule of politics, treating others as you would like to be treated, should guide our actions regardless of the election outcome.

I personally witnessed numerous instances of misconduct during the election. GOP challengers and I were not allowed to perform our duties properly, as Michigan laws dictate. We were consistently prevented from observing the ballot process, and when we raised concerns, they were dismissed. We saw ballots being backdated and incorrect data being entered into the computer system. Poll workers were inputting information from new mail-in ballots, including birthdates of 1/1/1900, which were not previously recorded. There have been numerous reports of irregularities during the vote count. I have shared this information with Republican senators and representatives. Dead people were found to have voted, as evidenced by a list of over 17,000 Michigan voters above the age of 80 who had cast their ballots and were also listed in obituaries. This election is crucial, and it is time for legislators to fulfill their oath to defend the constitution. Despite media claims, there is substantial evidence of widespread voter fraud unlike anything we have seen before.

Al Gore and others express their belief that the 2000 presidential election was stolen from them. They claim that George W. Bush did not win and that the Supreme Court, along with individuals like Katherine Harris and Jeb Bush, tampered with the results. They argue that the election process was rigged and that there were issues with voting machines. They mention instances of machines malfunctioning and being hacked. They emphasize the importance of a fair and accurate vote count and express their objection to the election procedures. They also acknowledge that both Republicans and Democrats have been involved in election manipulation in the past.

I support President Donald Trump and share the concerns of many Americans about voting irregularities in the last election. I want to assure you that on Wednesday, we will have our day in Congress to address these concerns. We will hear objections and review the evidence.

Multiple speakers express concerns about the legitimacy of elections, focusing on the 2016, 2000, 2004, and 2018 elections. Several speakers claim that Russian interference affected the outcome of the 2016 election, leading them to view Trump as an illegitimate president. Some believe Trump is aware of this illegitimacy. The 2000 Bush v. Gore election is cited as an example of a court-appointed president, with claims that Al Gore won Florida but the Supreme Court halted the vote count. The 2004 election in Ohio is described as riddled with problems, including malfunctioning machines and allegations of voting rights violations. Some believe John Kerry privately thought the election was stolen. The 2018 Georgia gubernatorial election is also disputed, with accusations that Brian Kemp, then Secretary of State, suppressed votes and disenfranchised voters, leading to Stacey Abrams' loss. Speakers assert the election was not fair and that Abrams likely won. Concerns are raised about the integrity of electronic voting machines and the lack of paper trails.

Four years ago, there were concerns about uncounted votes in Illinois. The senator from New York commended the senator from California for raising objections and allowing the discussion of these issues. A computing error in Franklin County awarded extra votes to George Bush, raising questions about the accuracy and integrity of the election system. These issues were not limited to Ohio, as other states also faced similar situations. The legitimacy of our elections is being challenged, which is concerning given our efforts to promote democracy worldwide. The objection raised in Ohio is just one example of the irregularities observed. The debate will continue thanks to the objection from California. The golden rule in politics is emphasized, regardless of the election outcome.

Speaker 0 presents a video focused on data and evidence of alleged irregularities in the 2020 election, asserting that there has been no comprehensive place to see widespread fraud until now. He states the video is “pure data” and invites viewers to consider the statistical anomalies in three states (Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia) in the early hours of 11/04/2020, when Biden received major vote spikes after trailing Trump. - He analyzes 8,954 individual vote updates and identifies a clear statistical pattern across nearly all updates, with four notably aberrant updates: two in Michigan, one in Wisconsin, and one in Georgia, all occurring in the same five-hour window in the middle of the night when counting reportedly stopped in some places. - In Michigan, a 06:30AM update shows Biden at 141,258 votes to Trump’s 5,968, described as the most extreme update in all datasets across all states, followed by a noticeable ratio change in nearby updates. In Wisconsin, a single update allegedly moved Biden from trailing by over 100,000 votes into the lead. In Georgia, a 01:34AM Eastern Time update shows Biden at 136,155 to Trump’s 29,115. They claim these four spikes exceed the states’ margins of victory, making the spikes not only abnormal by percentage but also by magnitude. They conclude that if these four unlikely updates had not happened, the presidency could have been different. - Detractors are cited as arguing human error, but the video questions where evidence of corrections is, and notes that California shows only one anomalous update in percentage, not enough magnitude to shift outcomes. - A “consistently identical ratio of Biden to Trump votes across time” is highlighted as allegedly impossible, with a Florida example showing 100 identical ratios over several days. The video asserts a computer algorithm is involved, termed a weighted race distribution, associated with Diebold voting machines (known as early as 2001), implying values rather than simple counts. - In California, a single update is shown with Biden receiving about 65% and Trump 32% for one vote, raising questions about how one vote could go to more than one candidate. Speaker 0 then links these patterns to alleged connections between Diebold and Dominion Voting Systems, claiming Dominion acquired ESNS in 2010, which had previously acquired Diebold, and that Dominion’s software is licensed from Smartmatic. They also note that forensic audits show errors and that the mainstream narrative claims these issues are misinformation. They reference NBC News and PBS findings on how easy it is to hack voting machines or cast fake votes. Next, Speaker 0 notes eyewitness and video evidence from Georgia: poll worker Ruby allegedly was filmed in the backroom with absentee ballots, and at 10:30PM on November 3, media and poll watchers were told to leave, yet Ruby and others remained, pulling ballots from under a table and distributing them to counting stations. They describe Ruby running the same stack of ballots to the machine three times, observing a large Biden surge after 01:34AM Georgia time, and question whether a ballot can be counted more than once, citing Coffey County, Georgia as an example of someone claiming to scan the same batches repeatedly. Speaker 0 references Raquel Rodriguez, arrested for election fraud in Texas over video evidence of ballot harvesting, and asserts that cybersecurity evidence indicates Dominion and Edison Research used an unencrypted VPN with easily accessible credentials allowing foreign access, asserting that China, Iran, and other countries accessed the servers, contradicting claims that Dominion machines were not connected to the Internet. They mention Dominion’s association with a Chinese-registered domain, and board members with Chinese nationality, alleging conflicts of interest through corporate ownership and licensing from Smartmatic. Speaker 0 highlights that Antrim County, Michigan audits found high error and adjudication rates in Dominion, with an 68 o 5% error rate far above federal guidelines, missing logs for 2020, and reprogramming of election event designer cards during the safe harbor period. They point to subpoenas and the lack of access to logs, and to affidavits from poll workers claiming illegal activities, non-equal treatment of observers, counting without proper oversight, shredding ballots, and other irregularities. Speaker 7 concludes with a claim that many Americans distrust the 2020 election and urges viewers to download and share the video, demand election reform, and notes that the video’s credits will continue with data readers, while warning of erasure or fact checks by tech platforms.