TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Megyn Kelly and her panel discuss new reporting on intelligence leaks aimed at undermining President Trump, focusing on declassified material that points to James Comey leaking through a Columbia University professor friend and shaping narratives about Russia and Trump. The guests explain that FBI inspector general findings show Comey and two aides discussed leaks to the New York Times, with Richmond, a Columbia law professor placed on the payroll, given access to top secret information to burnish Comey’s image and set future narratives. The reporter involved, Michael Schmidt of the Times, later won Pulitzers for Russia Gate coverage. The panel notes that the FBI traced six code-named leak investigations and, in every case, the Justice Department declined prosecution, they point out a double standard that appears to treat Democrats more leniently, while Donald Trump faced a raid and indictment over classified material at Mar-a-Lago. Solomon walks through an episode where Richmond met Comey, used the special government employee arrangement to bypass the FBI press office, and told investigators he didn’t “leak” with a discount denial. The discussion includes the implication that Comey’s team and the Obama Justice Department may have interfered in investigations into Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation, and that this would be part of a larger pattern of political interference. The hosts turn to broader media dynamics, noting how outlets like the New York Times and Washington Post have handled Russia Gate coverage, including interviews with reporters and critics, and the way some correspondents are portrayed as sympathetic to official narratives. They reference CrowdStrike’s assessment of the DNC hack and underscore the distinction between intrusion into systems and evidence of exfiltration, arguing that some coverage overstated conclusions. The conversation touches on Tulsi Gabbard’s declassification efforts and the response from Daniel Richmond’s circle, including a note about Ellen Nakashiska’s reporting. In a separate segment, Rich Lowry and Charles C.W. Cook discuss the politics of California. Steve Hilton, a candidate for governor, describes a top-two primary dynamic that currently pairs him with Katie Porter. Hilton criticizes Gavin Newsom’s redistricting efforts and argues that California’s one-party rule has produced high costs, ineffective homelessness policies, and a climate policy regime that has driven up housing and energy costs. He describes his plan to reverse this trajectory, addressing education, safety, immigration, and the state’s regulatory environment, and argues that federal policy alone cannot fix California. The program then shifts to cultural commentary, including a lengthy discussion of Monica Lewinsky’s reflections on immigration and of John Oliver’s satirical framing, followed by Christine Baranski weighing in on billionaire space travel and publicity. The conversation closes with reflections on the national mood around crime, policing, border control, and the role of the media in reporting controversial topics, along with a brisk nod to the ongoing coverage of Tulsi Gabbard’s disclosures and Steve Hilton’s campaign in California. That’s the show’s update.

A historic indictment of former FBI director James Comey dominates this episode, signaling a high-stakes legal battle over statements to Congress and potential obstruction. Comey is charged with two felony counts—false statements to Congress and obstruction of a congressional proceeding—each carrying up to five years in prison. The case was presented by a grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia. Megan Kelly anchors the discussion with Dave Arinberg, Mike Davis, and John Solomon, who preview forthcoming details at the arraignment and the potential path of the case. The indictment centers on Comey’s testimony about whether he authorized FBI colleagues to anonymously leak information to the press. The government says he lied when he testified that he had not authorized anyone at the FBI to leak to news outlets, including a 2016 October Wall Street Journal article tied to the Hillary Clinton email probe. Two Comey-era officials—James Baker and Andrew McCabe—are discussed; McCabe’s credibility is questioned, while Baker’s interview asserts that leaks were directed through Comey’s chief of staff. John Solomon notes the timeline’s documentary basis and the indictment’s lean frame. Panelists debate the indictment’s strength and scope. Mike Davis says probable cause likely existed, but the case may hinge on proving the exact leak and who authorized it. Dave Arinberg pushes for identifying the article and leakers, noting a possible earlier leak associated with Comey. John Solomon cautions that the public record may be thin and that forthcoming documents, including FBI affidavits, will shape the argument. They discuss defenses such as vindictive or malicious prosecutions and the judge’s role in pretrial rulings. Beyond the Comey case, the episode turns to public figures and publishing. The hosts critique Kamala Harris’s book tour, referencing crowd reactions and media narratives about her tone. They discuss Hoda Kotb’s new book, Jump and Find Joy, and how it’s being marketed. The conversation weaves political-media analysis with pop-culture commentary, including brief remarks about Harris’s tour coverage and related online discourse, and about Kotb’s promotional appearances.

The Megyn Kelly Show, now on its own SiriusXM channel, featured Matt Walsh and Victor Davis Hanson discussing a range of pressing political and cultural issues. The show opened with a discussion about the New York City mayoral race, focusing on candidate Zoran Mamdani, who is described as a communist with alleged ties to radical Islamists. Walsh and Kelly expressed concern over his potential victory, highlighting his anti-American rhetoric, lack of assimilation, and the perceived threat of Islamic tenets to Western civilization, particularly given New York City's high immigrant population and the controversial ballot structure. They also touched on similar political trends in Minneapolis with Omar Fetay. The conversation then shifted to transgender issues, sparked by an incident at a Gold's Gym in Los Angeles where a woman was expelled for objecting to a man in the women's locker room, a situation enabled by California state law. Walsh criticized both the law and the gym's compliance, advocating for stronger resistance to such policies. The discussion extended to transgender and intersex athletes in women's sports, specifically the National Women's Soccer League, where a player's eligibility based on biological sex was questioned, leading to accusations of racism and transphobia against those advocating for clear, biologically-based eligibility rules. Walsh condemned these accusations as "emotional blackmail" and a rejection of reality by the left. A significant portion of the show addressed the "conservative civil war" between prominent figures like Tucker Carlson and Ben Shapiro, ignited by Carlson's interview with white nationalist Nick Fuentes. Matt Walsh emphasized loyalty to friends and the importance of focusing conservative efforts on the "radical left," whom he characterized as the true enemy. He argued that internal squabbles distract from this primary fight, particularly after the death of a mutual friend, Charlie Kirk. Finally, Victor Davis Hanson joined to discuss the legal challenges facing former FBI Director James Comey, specifically his indictment for allegedly lying to Congress about authorizing media leaks related to the Hillary Clinton email investigation. New evidence, including Comey's communications with Daniel Richmond, suggests he did authorize leaks. Hanson and Kelly also discussed Comey's denial of receiving intelligence about Hillary Clinton's plan to tie Donald Trump to Russia. The segment concluded with a critique of former CIA Director John Brennan, who was confronted about his role in dismissing the Hunter Biden laptop story as Russian disinformation, highlighting what they view as a pattern of deception by intelligence officials.

Memorial reverberations from Charlie’s death ignite a sweeping political conversation that links grief to power, truth, and the week’s battles over media and memory. Lash describes the memorial as heavy yet communal, while Marowitz recalls Charlie as a movement leader whose loss marks a turning point. The conversation acknowledges ongoing left-wing violence, noting a Texas ICE facility shooting that surfaced in coverage, and they promise to tie these threads back to Charlie’s legacy as the show aims to extract meaning amid the rapid news cycle. Attention then shifts to the Justice Department’s reported move to indict James Comey for perjury in relation to his 2016 Russia inquiry testimony, with the five-year statute looming. Dana argues Comey’s qualification of ‘I think so’ in response to whether there was surveillance creates a defensible buffer, but she and Rubin reject the idea that he was genuinely truthful. Carol adds that other Comey-era actions, including leaks approved by Comey that were later attributed to others, complicate the picture. Trump’s public reaction—calling Comey a bad person—frames the broader calculus about accountability and political risk. The panel pivots to media portrayal and the political theatre around charges against Comey, criticizing Jake Tapper for injecting partisan spin and noting that prosecutors must decide whether a viable case exists, independent of Trump’s desires. Dana reminds viewers of historic patterns in the FBI investigation era, while Carol points to the reliability of leaks and media framing. The discussion broadens to a Tennessee State University incident where MAGA supporters faced a hostile campus reception, highlighting perceived asymmetries in how conservative voices are treated on campus versus liberal voices. They review President Trump’s UN speech moment and his critique of the UN, including claims of funding migrants and alleged sabotage of his teleprompter and escalator course, framing it as part of a broader clash with global institutions. A closing segment invokes Thomas Sowell’s critique of the managerial class and its distance from consequences, tying the thread to a call for accountability and a new generation of voters—Gen X and Gen Z—prepared to challenge established power structures. The conversation closes with personal notes about weekend plans and mutual support.

Dax Shepard welcomes former FBI Director James Comey, who discusses his career, including his role in prosecuting organized crime and his new crime novel, "Central Park West." Comey shares insights about his family background, including his grandfather's law enforcement career and his father's influence on his decision to pursue law. He recounts a traumatic experience at 17 when he and his brother were held at gunpoint by a rapist, which shaped his perspective on life and law enforcement. Comey reflects on his height, noting he grew significantly during high school, and discusses his college years, where he initially aimed to become a doctor but eventually shifted to law after discovering his passion for writing and ethics. He describes his journey as a federal prosecutor, particularly in high-profile cases like the Gambino crime family, and how Hollywood's portrayal of mobsters influenced real-life criminals. The conversation shifts to Comey's tenure as FBI Director, where he faced significant challenges, including the investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails. He explains the difficult decision to announce the reopening of the investigation just days before the election, emphasizing the importance of transparency and the rule of law over political considerations. Comey expresses the emotional toll this period took on him and his family, particularly his daughters. As they discuss Comey's transition to writing fiction, he reveals that "Central Park West" features a female protagonist inspired by his daughters, blending personal experiences with crime fiction. He credits his wife, Patrice, for her support and collaboration in the writing process. The episode concludes with light-hearted banter about personal experiences, including a humorous anecdote about a recent restaurant outing where Dax and his friend navigated the complexities of ordering drinks and tipping, reflecting on the social dynamics of dining out.