reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Some batches of the vaccine may have serious side effects or be degraded. The batch number can be checked to see what to expect. Documentation shows that certain batches have more serious adverse effects. Even the best batches from Pfizer and Moderna had a high rate of serious adverse events in the short term, around 1800.

Twenty percent of Americans did not take the COVID vaccine because it was not safe enough. The mRNA in the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines has been chemically modified to resist breakdown by enzymes. The mRNA and spike protein are found in the heart and brain, and the spike protein circulates in the blood for six to nine months post-vaccination. The speaker claims the lethal part of the virus circulates in the blood of vaccinated individuals, especially after boosters, and that it is a killer protein. The speaker asserts safety trumps efficacy and objects to claims that vaccines, specifically the COVID-19 vaccine, saved millions of lives. They state that consent forms do not guarantee the vaccine will save lives and that there has never been a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial showing that COVID-19 vaccines reduce mortality or hospitalization.

I was fired after 31 years as an ER doctor for questioning the need for vaccination in those with natural immunity. Pfizer's hidden biodistribution studies reveal the vaccines spread throughout the body, causing various side effects due to the spike protein reaching all organs.

The discussion connects multiple individuals and organizations to alleged covert intelligence activity and influence over major events. It begins by referencing Robert F. Kennedy’s campaign and Teddy Kennedy’s chief counsel, then claims that attorney Jeffrey Blattner (executive chairman of HIAS) told Ted Kennedy not to run against incumbent Linda B. Johnson, after which Robert Kennedy ran anyway. The transcript then links Jules Kroll to Robert Kennedy’s campaign team and asserts that Jules Kroll is IDF unit 82,300 while Jeffrey Blattner is Mossad. It claims that in 1972 Jules Kroll and his wife Lynn Korda Kroll began a private intelligence operation called J. Kroll and Associates, which later became Kroll Incorporated and grew into a major private intelligence and investigative firm. The speaker says Kroll and K2 Intelligence are related “distinction without a difference,” and that Kroll worked for clients including the Vatican and Bernie Madoff, as well as being used in cases such as Harvey Weinstein investigations. The transcript also claims that the firm’s Tel Aviv spinoff later had a chief technology officer who was an IDF sergeant in unit 82,300, described as an Israeli signals intelligence equivalent to the NSA. The “plot” relevance is tied to the speaker’s claim that Kroll’s wife had a role in UJA Federation (United Jewish Appeal), and it expands into UJA Federation’s alleged connections to broader power networks. It identifies Larry Silverstein as former chairman of UJA Federation (1994–1997), describes him as connected to “old money” Jewish families and Mossad-related figures, and brings in Brian Michael Jenkins (described as deputy chairman of Kroll) and L. Paul Bremer. The transcript claims French intelligence suspected Jenkins and Bremer of promoting threat prevention strategies and then causing attacks when organizations didn’t adopt them. It further states that the New York Port Authority hired Kroll in 1993 to conduct a terrorism vulnerability threat analysis for the World Trade Center Plaza and that the report included a line item suggesting (it said) it was unlikely but possible that the towers could be vulnerable to being hit by jet airliners. The transcript then asserts the Port Authority hired Kroll to run security for the World Trade Center Plaza immediately after Jenkins’ report, and links that year to Larry Silverstein becoming president of UJA Federation. A Mossad whistleblower is introduced: Victor Ostrovsky. The transcript says Ostrovsky, after serving in the Israeli Defense Force beginning at age 14 and becoming a Mossad agent for fourteen months, became a “burn notice”/whistleblower and wrote two books: *By Way of Deception* and *The Other Side of Deception*. It claims the books’ content was managed to avoid “mass scale antisemitism,” and lists ADL (Jonathan Greenblatt), APAC, and UJA as entities said to be arms of Mossad, citing social media training claims and appointment/training activities mentioned in the transcript. The transcript then moves to post–September 11 financial and structural changes, asserting that Solomon Smith Barney (described as the largest tenant of World Trade Center Building 7) was “crashed” and consolidated, and it claims $2.3 trillion referenced by Donald Rumsfeld was consolidated among Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, BlackRock, Blackstone, Apollo, and a little to Goldman Sachs. It states there were 3,800 Jews who worked in both towers and claims only four Jewish deaths were reported on 09/11, including Daniel Lewin (cofounder of Akamai) described as reportedly the first 9/11 casualty and said to be IDF. Additional claims focus on corporate ownership: the transcript asks who is the largest shareholder of BlackRock and asserts Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley ownership (with Merrill Lynch said to own 45%), and it links BlackRock’s founding to Steven Schwarzman of Blackstone, and Rob Capito as UJA Federation. It further asserts connections among Blackstone, BlackRock, Apollo Global Management, Larry Silverstein, and James Tisch, alongside Mark Rich (born Marcel Reich), and describes Mark Rich as having brokered deals involving Iran, Israel, and the Ayatollah through Mossad agents that allegedly reduced oil costs despite US sanctions. It then identifies Michael Chertoff as “second generation Mossad” and claims he coauthored the Patriot Act with provisions to protect Israel from future investigation, later appointing him as secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and later chairman of BAE Systems. The transcript claims Rumsfeld later chaired a pharmaceutical company (Eli Lilly) and sat on boards connected to Investor AB. The discussion culminates in claims about COVID-19: it introduces Alvin Krongard, alleging he controls conservative media, helped plan and cover up COVID, and made trades before September 11 and before related outcomes. It asserts that BlackRock’s Aladdin (and similar tools “In-Q-Tel” and “Lab 72/Lab 41”) was used to model pandemic impacts, and claims Avril Haines (described as working directly for Tony Blinken) was sent to “Event 201” to seize control of the global financial system. Finally, it asserts COVID was “calibrated” to affect certain populations through ACE2 receptor polymorphisms, and it connects Sergei Brin and 23andMe to access to patient DNA data used for calibration. The transcript ends mid-sentence as it continues discussing these claims.

The speaker discusses a hypothesis regarding the connection between COVID-19 and the vaccines. They mention that SARS-CoV-2 was a product of dual-use research and that the spike protein in the vaccines is also from SARS-CoV-2. They explain that some people who received multiple vaccine shots experienced an interesting effect called IgG 4, which turns down the immune response. The speaker suggests that if the vaccines induce this attenuation signal, it could potentially make a population less reactive to a pathogen. They note that the Chinese did not use mRNA vaccines like other countries, which could mean that populations are now different in terms of their immune response. The speaker acknowledges that this is only a hypothesis and lacks evidence. They also express concerns about the widespread vaccination efforts and the unknown long-term impacts.

We need to discuss bioweapons. I've spent over two years researching them for a book and the technology to develop these microbes is rapidly advancing. Hundreds of millions have been invested in ethnically targeted microbes, and China is doing the same. There's an argument that COVID-19 was ethnically targeted, disproportionately impacting certain races. The genetic structure of ACE2 receptors varies among races, making some more immune than others. COVID-19 seems to target Caucasians and Black people, while Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese individuals appear more immune. Whether this was deliberate is unknown, but research shows the racial and ethnic impact differential. China and the U.S. are developing ethnic bioweapons, which explains those labs in Ukraine that collect Russian and Chinese DNA for targeting purposes.

RFK stated that the COVID virus, or bioweapon as some call it, attached to the ACE2 variant, which is most common in white Americans and then black Americans. I believe that this is the first time in American history that white folks were first in line for genocide. Many Black people didn't trust the vaccine, but many did take it because they saw white people taking it. I think this was a smooth trick by the Jews. Black people have been experimented on by white people in this country, so when we saw white people getting the injections, we thought it was safe. We didn't realize that it was Jews killing both groups.

The spike protein may inhibit tumor suppressor genes like MHS 3p53 and BRCA2, potentially leading to cancer. The mRNA vaccine contains a base that allows the spike protein to be produced for longer, possibly further inhibiting tumor suppressor genes. Concerns are raised about the long-term effects of these vaccines, with a call for them to be banned for general use and reserved for gene therapy in advanced cancer cases.

I was upset with the CDC for stopping tracking of infections in vaccinated individuals. Vaccines should not have been mandated, and side effects should have been acknowledged. The vaccines do not fully protect against infection. The spike protein in the vaccines can cause harm. I now prefer using a protein-based vaccine by Novavax, as it provides a known amount of spike protein without the risk of prolonged impact seen with mRNA vaccines.

Speaker 0: And we need to talk about bioweapons. Well, I know a lot now about bioweapons because I've been doing a book on it for the past two and a half years. You know, the technology that we now have to develop these microbes, have we've put hundreds of millions of dollars into ethnically targeted microbes. The Chinese have done the same thing. In fact, COVID nineteen, there's an argument that it is ethnically targeted. COVID nineteen attacked certain races disproportionately. The the the the races that are most immune to COVID nineteen are because of the structure of the genetic structure of genetic differentials among different races of the receptors, of the ACE two receptor, COVID nineteen is targeted to attack Caucasians and black people. The people who are most immune are Ashkenazi Jews and and Chinese. And but we don't know whether it was deliberately targeted at that or not, but there are papers out there that show the, you know, the the racial and ethnic differential and of impact to that. We do know that the Chinese are spending hundreds of millions of dollars developing ethnic bioweapons, and we are developing ethnic bioweapons. That's what all those labs in the Ukraine are about. They're they're collecting Russian DNA. They're collecting Chinese DNA so we can target people.

There is no question that the inclusion of DNA was not an accident, and the 1/3 DNA, 2/3 RNA ratio was intentional. The long-term effects of both DNA and RNA are influencing the ability to fight cancer. The key question is what effect the DNA has on the cell nucleus, and how to differentiate its damage from that of mRNA. mRNA is connected to ACE 2 receptors and causes damage throughout the reproductive and cardio systems. mRNA creates a spike protein flag, which the immune system attacks, leading to organ damage. The presence of DNA makes the process last longer. While mRNA would create spike for 8-12 months, DNA can influence the nucleus for years, producing mRNA near the nucleus. This extends the process from months to 8-10 years due to the decision to include DNA.

The spike protein, according to research in South Africa, induces fibrin from fibrinogen, forming the backbone of clotting in a way not previously seen. Unlike normal fibrin clots that are easily broken down, clots formed from COVID or the spike protein from the vaccine are difficult to break down, causing issues for many people. A cardiologist stated that in their decades of practice, they have never treated as many blood clots as in the last five years. These blood clots occur after the virus infection and the vaccine because the spike protein causes blood clots. Therefore, it is reckless to continue vaccinating people and loading the body with spike protein, causing more blood clots. According to a paper in Cell (July 2021), the nucleoprotein, not the spike protein, supplied broad and durable immunity for the prevention of infection. The speaker questions why the vaccine wasn't changed to target the nucleoprotein once this information came to light.

Truth is out. Scientists are now confirming what many have long suspected. The COVID shots don't just impact your immune system. They can damage your brain and devastate mental health, and the evidence is overwhelming. A recent wave of studies have revealed shocking increases in ischemic strokes up forty four percent, hemorrhagic strokes up fifty percent, transient ischemic strokes or mini strokes up sixty seven percent, myasthenia gravis, a debilitating autoimmune condition up over seventy one percent, Alzheimer's up twenty two percent, cognitive impairment up nearly a hundred and thirty eight percent, depression up over sixty eight percent, anxiety disorders up nearly forty four percent, and sleep disorders up over ninety three percent, all linked to one thing, toxic spike protein accumulation and persistence in the brain. This isn't a conspiracy theory. There's a documented peer reviewed research published studies by documented experts, including by epidemiologist Nicholas Holcher, who says using mRNA to hijack cells in various organ systems to produce a highly toxic spike protein that persists in the body for months or even years was one of the worst ideas in medical history. So what can you do?

I've been researching bioweapons for a while now, and the technology we have to develop ethnically targeted microbes is concerning. We've invested heavily in this, and so has China. There's even an argument that COVID-19 was ethnically targeted, disproportionately affecting certain races. The varying levels of immunity to COVID-19 among different races are linked to genetic differences in the ACE2 receptor. Caucasians and Black people are more susceptible, while Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese individuals show greater immunity. Whether this was intentional is unknown, but research highlights these racial and ethnic disparities. The Chinese are investing heavily in bioweapon development, which explains the purpose of labs in Ukraine to collect Russian and Chinese DNA for targeting purposes.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the COVID-19 vaccine episode, challenging why the vaccine was pursued as a public health solution and exploring deeper incentives behind the program. - A knowledgeable figure at the stand answered a burning question: did they know the vaccine wouldn’t be effective from the start and could be dangerous? The answer given was that it was “a test of a technology.” The exchange suggests the broader aim was testing an entire program of control previewed in Event 2019. - They ask whether inoculation was necessary on billions, noting it could have been tested on a much smaller population. If shots had been basically empty or inert, the data could have been spun to claim success and end the pandemic, preventing injuries from appearing. The absence of that approach remains a mystery. - The speakers point to high pre-vaccine seroprevalence in 2020, including studies from South Dakota showing 50-60% seroprevalence before vaccine release, implying that a saline shot or no shot could have achieved “indomicity” (immunity) without a vaccine. - They discuss why people might fear vaccines and interpret the broader impact: the public is waking up to something terrible having occurred, as it revealed readiness to lie, potential data quality concerns, and risk to pregnant women and healthy children who might get little justification for risk. - The disease’s lethality is framed as greatest among the very old or very sick; for others, it was less deadly, with natural evolution potentially reducing vulnerability over time. - The mRNA platform was touted as a means to outrun mutations, but the timeline to release was still insufficient to stay ahead of natural change. They note accelerated development was the fastest vaccine in history, from detection to inoculation, reducing the timeline by about a year or two, yet not fast enough. - Political and logistical factors delayed release; there is mention that it would not have appeared under Trump and that Eric Topol argued to delay the rollout. Fauci reportedly sent Moderna back to trials due to insufficient racial diversity in participants. - The discussion questions whether the vaccine qualifies as a normal consumer product, given ongoing subsidies, mandates, indemnifications, wartime-like supports, and propaganda. They wonder if there has been an ongoing two-century revolt by industry against public scrutiny, with public interest repeatedly leading to pushback and rebranding. - A central theme is the sophistication of pharma: the “game of pharma” involves owning an IP-based health claim, crafting supportive research, convincing it is safe and effective, achieving standard-of-care status, securing mandates and government funding, and leveraging ongoing propaganda. They describe pharma as a long-running arms race with deep institutional knowledge, implying that it is far more capable of shaping reality than the public realizes.

A study from Lund University in Sweden indicates the Pfizer vaccine can reverse transcribe and install DNA into the human genome within a human liver cell line. This suggests an enzyme can transfer messenger RNA vaccine information into a person's DNA, a process previously claimed impossible. This finding potentially opens the door to lawsuits regarding genetic discrimination (GINA) against individuals who chose not to receive the vaccine. It raises concerns about potential impacts on the DNA of those vaccinated, including pregnant women and their babies. The CDC states that the vaccine will not change a person's DNA, but this new paper suggests otherwise.

The spike protein in the vaccine is specific to humans, affecting the ACE 2 pathways in sperm and ovaries. Genetic susceptibility to the virus varies by race, with African blacks having a 39% increase, Caucasians from Europe a 54% increase, and Ashkenazi Jews and Amish showing no increase.

The mRNA platform is effective but has a flaw: it can cause autoimmune disorders by producing foreign proteins in cells. The challenge is to target only specific cells and avoid damage to vital organs. The pandemic allowed the emergency use authorization of mRNA vaccines, bypassing safety measures. However, a large portion of the population has already accepted this technology. To address the issue, a solution could be to replace the spike protein with a different protein that doesn't have flaws. But if the problem lies in any foreign protein transcribed by cells, the immune system may still target vital organs.

I analyzed data showing a consistent 1.3 mortality gap between Moderna and Pfizer vaccines, with Moderna being 30% more likely to cause death. Pfizer reduced its active ingredient dosage due to toxicity concerns. The medical community must address this issue to maintain credibility. I reached out to a journal editor to review the data, which could potentially damage the reputation of health authorities and regulators.

The spike protein from the COVID-19 virus circulates in the body and can land in multiple organs, causing various diseases. Lab studies have shown that even without the virus, just injecting the spike protein can induce the same lung, vascular, heart, and brain diseases as COVID-19. The spike protein is considered the toxin responsible for causing the disease. This raises questions about why we are injecting something that is essentially a toxin into the human body, as it is not a traditional vaccine.

Alden and colleagues found that Pfizer's genetic code can be integrated into the human genome within an hour in a cancerous cell line. This suggests that Pfizer and Moderna's genetic material might become a permanent part of human DNA. There is no study confirming or denying this possibility. The concern is that if eggs or sperm incorporate this genetic code, it could be passed on to future generations. This lack of research is seen as reckless and worrisome.

The Pfizer vaccine contains not only mRNA but also plasma DNA from the vector used in its production. I sequenced samples from two batches of the vaccine in Colombia and found this DNA, which raises concerns about potential health risks. This DNA could integrate into the genomic DNA of cells, leading to permanent changes. Such integration poses theoretical risks, including autoimmune responses and cancer, depending on where the DNA inserts itself in the genome. While these risks may be rare, they warrant investigation to understand their implications better.

The speaker believes that changes have been made to reduce the short-term toxicity of vaccines, but long-term damage is still possible. A friend sent a paper discussing the racial specificity of the ACE2 pathway, where the spike protein hooks on. This pathway is unique to this coronavirus. The speaker states that ACE2 pathway upregulation varies racially. White Caucasians from Europe (excluding Finnish) and non-African blacks have 56% upregulation. African blacks have 39%, while Asians and Finnish have 10%. The Amish and Ashkenazi Jews have zero upregulation. The speaker notes the Amish do not participate in vaccine programs or DNA sampling.

The transcript presents a conspiratorial narrative that attributes the COVID-19 pandemic, its vaccines, and the global response to a “sinister Jewish role.” It states that the pandemic and the related “slavery to genocide initiative” are of Jewish religious origin, and that Jews created much of the technology, financed its weaponization, organized its global dissemination, and sit at the apex of its philosophical justification. It suggests that this is why some people describe it as the “Jew chat.” It proceeds to name a number of individuals in prominent positions as key influencers in the COVID-19 scenario in the United States and worldwide. These include Rochelle Walensky (CDC director); Anne Shuchat (CDC deputy director); Sherry Berger (CDC chief of staff); Mitchell Wolfe (CDC chief medical officer); Jeffrey Zients (White House coronavirus response coordinator); Andy Slavitt (COVID senior adviser); Richard (Rachel) Levine (assistant secretary of health and human services); Albert Bourla (chairman and CEO of Pfizer); Michael Dolsten (Pfizer chief scientist); Tal Zaks (Moderna chief scientist); Anatoli Altstine (chief scientist, Gamalia Institute for Russia COVID-19 vaccine); Joanne Waldstreicher (chief medical officer for Johnson & Johnson); and Yuval Noah Harari (a Jewish adviser to the World Economic Forum, described here as married to a man). The transcript asserts that these individuals and their roles determined how the COVID-19 crisis was handled and how the injections were rolled out. It also claims that Israel has never signed the 1972 Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention disarmament treaty. It further alleges, citing J. Bart Glassen, MD, that the Israeli Mossad infiltrated the NIH by 1988 and used the facility to orchestrate a large genocidal bioweapons attack on the world, naming the supposed chief Mossad agent within the NIH as Zami Bensassen. It references a report in BMC Medical Journal claiming that white and Black people were most likely to get sick from COVID-19, but that Ashkenazi Jews lack the ACE2 variant used by the spike protein to cause illness, asking whether this could be a coincidence. The narrative then asserts that the media pushed the pandemic narrative religiously, that Jews were central to the development of a “new technology” called mRNA injections, that Jews influenced the federal government to compel people to take the “harmful injections” misnamed as vaccines, and that social media implemented extreme censorship. It concludes that, in summary, COVID-19 was a “slavery to genocide” war waged against the people of the planet by Jews.

The harm caused by this vaccine isn't from the spike protein itself, but from the immune system's misidentification of the heart. The body attacks the heart because the spike protein alters its genetic image, making it seem foreign. This is fundamental immunology. The vaccine's creators were aware of this effect. The vaccine's toxicity and ability to manipulate the immune system to cause harm, whether slowly or rapidly, point to a deliberate design. This level of damage couldn't be accidental.