reSee.it - Related Video Feed

During a Seattle vigil, a speaker repeatedly asserts: "Do you support his death? I do." and "You support Charlie Kirk being killed? Yes." The speaker also says "Fuck Charlie Kirk" and notes: "On the day he died, you're here at a vigil Yep. For Charlie Kirk, and you support his death." The dialogue includes: "You sure do you support a Nazi? No. I don't support a Nazi. Charlie Kirk wasn't a Nazi." "You you support a shooter?" "Yep. Sure do." "You support Charlie Kirk's shooter? Sure do." "Would you shoot somebody like Charlie Kirk? I would've killed him myself." The exchange ends with: "Do you have a job here in Seattle? Nope. I take that for a look."

Rumors online about a college tour are false; I was told by my team that I'm that I canceled some sort of college tour. That's bullshit. I will be visiting college campuses this year, and others will join, because we're Americans and won't be deterred. Charlie's voice is not silent, and we will pick up that bloodstained microphone where Charlie left it. To those who would intimidate or seek to end free discussion or claim ownership over public spaces and threaten those who speak freely, we will not be deterred. I have two words: Fuck you. We will not stop telling or debating the truth, and we will stand up for what America is and for what you should be, never letting Charlie Kirk's voice die. Goodbye to my friend, Charlie Kirk. May your memory be a blessing for your family and for your country and for all of us.

"To my great fellow Americans, I am filled with grief and anger at the heinous assassination of Charlie Kirk on a college campus in Utah." "Charlie inspired millions, and tonight, all who knew him and loved him are united in shock and horror." "Charlie was a patriot who devoted his life to the cause of open debate and the country that he loved so much, The United States Of America." "He's a martyr for truth and freedom, and there's never been anyone who was so respected by youth." "This is a dark moment for America." "Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them." "It is true the anti defamation league was part and parcel with black lives matter."

Speaker 0 says, "If you're celebrating the death of Charlie Kirk, you're a bad person. You're going to hell." Speaker 1 adds, "May. Fuck Charlie Kirk," and declares, "The off ramp to the high road is closed," insisting they won't feel guilty about a "bullshit hero" who spread harm. They stress, "This has nothing to do with conservative versus liberal" or with Democrats versus Republicans, and point out the alleged suspect is "an old white guy." They predict media will misframe the event as "an isolated incident by a lone shooter" and that "it's gonna end up being a white guy." They acknowledge sadness with "Abso fucking lutely," but conclude, "However, fuck that guy. God’s timing is always right." "Good day, goofies."

OMG's report details a FEMA insider's reaction to Charlie Kirk's assassination coverage. Fox News reported that FEMA has put an official on leave from their department who stated online that Charlie Kirk was a racist, homophobic, misogynist. Now O'Keefe Media has a new expose on another FEMA official. On the night of Charlie Kirk's death, journalist met with a section chief with Infema named Sean C. Kelly. Sean Kelly works in USERA, the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act section of FEMA. He started to indulge immediately about the murder of Kirk and said into the hidden camera that Charlie, quote, deserves it in his own way. And it's, quote, tough not to laugh at this stuff. 'Everybody's kind of laughing.' Afterward, Kelly allegedly continued to send pro assassination memes of Kirk to our journalists on text messages and anonymously signed an opposition letter against the Trump administration.

'This guy is an extreme get my face.' 'You're acting deranged.' 'This kid's actually super fucking dangerous.' 'He is a very dangerous kid, it makes me very sad that he is in this community, that he is a part of this beautiful school.' 'Do you think that Charlie Kirk should have been killed?' 'I don't give a fuck about Charlie Kirk, and I don't give a fuck about you, dawg.' 'Do you think he should have been killed?' 'I don't give a fuck about you, and I don't give a fuck about Charlie.' 'Fuck you.' 'Do you think it was justified? I think you should fuck off. I think you should go back to New York or go back to LA.' 'Make sure you at me at squid tips at YouTube.' 'Don't be a fucking pussy this time, dog. Fucking post it loser.'

A discussion centers on the claim that 'Charlie Kirk got shot and killed,' with participants reacting. One says 'Happy. Goodbye,' and another adds 'That's good that people are getting shot just off a political view.' The conversation repeats 'Charlie Keurig got shot and killed today,' and someone replies 'Girl, someone had to do it.' Others call the target 'he was a misogynist.' When asked if they'd press a button to prevent it, one says 'Nope. I think things happen for a purpose.' A speaker predicts media framing: 'the left has dispute so much hate and brainwashed so many people into doing stupid shit like this.' They claim 'he deserved it' and call it 'a sign of what liberalism has done to US society. It's just led to a complete moral decay and decay of morals and just any semblance of humanity.'

At Utah Valley University, students gathered to pay tribute to Charlie Kirk, assassinated on campus nine days earlier, ahead of his funeral with tens of thousands expected, including president Trump. The vigil follows Kirk’s death and an outreach he made the day before to CNN’s Van Jones. The dispute began after a Ukrainian woman was fatally stabbed in North Carolina; Kirk claimed the murder happened because she was white, while Van Jones denounced that as completely unfounded. Kirk then sent out what Van calls a "fire hose of tweets" challenging his argument, which Van says sparked death threats against him. In a direct message on x dated September 9, Kirk wrote: "Hey, Van. I mean it. I'd love to have you on my show to have a respectful conversation about crime and race. I would be a gentleman as I know you would be as well. We can disagree about the issues agreeably." Jones says he did not see it until the day after Kirk was murdered. "Let's disagree agreeably." He adds he would have tried to get him on the show and that "We were words not weapons." He ends with a call to civil discourse: "Civil discourse, civil dialogue, debate, let's disagree agreeably."

Transcript portrays a speaker accusing leftists of celebrating Charlie Kirk's death and circulating provocative statements about guns and violence. It includes the lines: 'Leftists celebrating Charlie Kirk's death.' 'Watch this.' 'Bye, Charlie Kirk.' 'Like you said, people getting shot and killed for the second amendment is so worth it. I never thought we'd agree on anything.' 'Bye.' 'I just wanna be part of yourself.' 'By the sword, die by the sword.' 'He did say that gun deaths were an acceptable side effect of gun rights.' 'Congratulations to Charlie Kirk for becoming the new poster child for gun awareness and violence.'

Who killed Charlie Kirk? At the young age of 31 years old, he had already founded and ran the largest conservative youth organization in the country. I do not believe we have anything near the real story about the horrific murder of Charlie Kirk last week. The narrative presented by the FBI and other government agencies is wildly contradictory with an ever changing plot line that makes little sense. Some individuals close to Kirk have reported that his foreign policy position was shifting away from the standard neoconservative militarism in favor of a more noninterventionist approach. Was Charlie Kirk murdered directly or indirectly by powerful forces who could not tolerate such a shift in views and such an influential leader? We don't know. But no army or assassin can stop an idea whose time has come. Rest in peace.

Participants discuss the news that Charlie Kirk was shot, with uncertainty about whether he is dead: "Murder for having a different opinion from somebody else." They note, "I haven't seen anything that said confirmed." Rumors about who shot him spur debate: "a supporter shooting their gun off in celebration"—"That's a crazy take." They stress we "We don't know any of full details of this yet" and that "it's not a tweet. It's not on their Twitter account" or anything, with clips shared by "Dave Portnoy reposted this." The mood is horror and condemnation: "Nobody deserves that." They condemn the culture of division, call out "paid propagandists masquerading as the news," and warn this event could either spur meaningful dialogue or fuel violence and fear. The speakers fear the impact on political courage and discourse.

Created sex. Do you support his death? I do. You support his death? Fuck Charlie Kirk. You support Charlie Kirk being killed? Yes. I do. On the day he died, you're here at a vigil Yep. For Charlie Kirk, and you support his death. You sure do you support a Nazi? No. I don't support a Nazi. Charlie Kirk wasn't a Nazi. Supported followers in the You you support a shooter? Yep. Sure do. It's for you. You support Charlie Kirk's shooter? Sure do. He does he does all his favor. Would you shoot somebody like Charlie Kirk? I would've killed him myself. You would've killed him yourself? Okay. Do you have a job here in Seattle? Nope. I take that for a look.

I demand their firing. I demand their immediate firing because your lack of action, when this has been brought to your attention, that some would wish the death upon others. And you're okay with this. Dude, that's what this says to people. This LGBTQAI plus nonsense and people wishing death on us, the Christians. And you're pumping that shit into kids' heads. Your teachers are pumping that shit into kids' heads. I demand counseling for the kids that were hurt by Charlie Kirk's death that he dissed. This is he can't can have free speech. He just can't have a job on taxpayer money. Mhmm. He needs to accept himself and correct himself and get rid of him. It is the will of the people, and we are done with you with your rules. You're a foul and evil woman. You're a coward. Why don't you look at me? When did you know? Friday. We're taking it. We're doing the best we can. We're too slow. The world is moving on way too fast for you, old man. I'm serious. Are in recess. Can I have three or four more public comments slots? All of those in favor of adjournment, please.

Discussion about the Charlie Kirk assassination includes, "he's a lunatic and, like, awful and kinda deserves it in his own way" and, "it's tough not to laugh at this stuff." It is reported that "FEMA has put an official on leave from their department who stated online that Charlie Kirk was a racist, homophobic, misogynist." O'Keefe Media Group says there is "a new expose on another FEMA official and what he says about Charlie Kirk shocks the conscience." On the night of Kirk's death, a journalist met FEMA section chief Sean C. Kelly for dinner in DC; Kelly works in USERA. The section chief "started to indulge immediately about the murder of Kirk" and said into the hidden camera that "Charlie... deserves it in his own way" and it's, "tough not to laugh at this stuff." He allegedly sent pro assassination memes and "anonymously signed" an opposition letter against the Trump administration; the subject was "one of those anonymously listed employees." A buddy "got put on admin leave" for signing an anonymous letter to The New York Times about "the lack of preparedness" and "getting rid of DEI."

Smith onto the space. Harrison, thanks for joining. We’ve got questions about your tweet. How are you? Harrison: I’m pretty good. I just got home, trying to do Advent with my kids, so I have about ten minutes. I heard Matt Baker defending me, so I came to settle objections. What’s up? Smith: First of all, I appreciate you coming on. We’ve had disagreements on X. The first question is about your original tweet about someone telling you Charlie Kirk was going to be assassinated. Explain that, because I’ve got a question about your second tweet. Harrison: That’s it. There’s no further explanation. Somebody with knowledge of the situation told me that, and I tweeted it in response to something Ian Carroll had said, a month before. I told the story again on Moonbase Live when I talked to Jake Shields, a week before the shooting. I won’t tell you who told me because they asked me not to, but it’s basically corroborated. The person I talked to was not the same as those who talked to people like Max Blumenthal. So apparently, multiple people are telling the same story. Only I published it before the event. Did the FBI or TC or something ask you any questions about it? Smith: Nope. Harrison: And that’s the problem, Soleiman. That’s the problem right there. Smith: We’ll move on. He’s got ten minutes. The tweet today said: “the assassination of Charlie Kirk has been a resounding success for the left, they got to kill one of our shining lights, divide the right and normalise political violence and the only backlash they received was Jimmy Kimmel show got suspended for two days.” That seems to contradict your first statement, since the first tweet was before the assassination. How does that message come across? Harrison: The first tweet was before the assassination, so it couldn’t have anything to do with who I thought did it. It was before the assassination, a month earlier, and I had heard the rumor that Charlie Kirk feared for his life. The second tweet reflects the world view that most left people have: “we killed Charlie Kirk. We got away with.” It’s about the left believing they did it and got away with it, and it’s about the weakness of the right to treat threats against us with seriousness. Whether or not it was a leftist is still up in the air; I have unanswered questions about the patsy they have now. Still, the left has benefited. The left acts like they did it. The official story is the left did it, personally. I have questions about that story, but what matters is the widespread perception that the left did it and got away with it, and that informs their behavior. Smith: Do you think the widespread opinion matters? Harrison: I can’t hear you both at once. Matt? Smith: How do you feel about the genocide in Gaza? Harrison: I’m strongly against the genocide in Gaza. Vocally. Since before October 7. I’m against it as an Israeli shill? Smith: No one said that. The argument was that you’ve spoken out against genocide in Gaza before October 7, but Infowars promotes Zionist agendas and Zionist talking points, attacking Muslims in the United States and the UK. Zionist billionaires like Robert Shillman, etc. Harrison: I get it. Zionist interests overlap with mine, but it has nothing to do with Zionism in our calculus. I am for Western culture, America, heritage Americans of all backgrounds, and I’m fighting for Christianity. I’m against Muslims infiltrating Western countries, and I’m against Zionists controlling Western countries. These are not contradictory. There’s nothing Zionist about not wanting Muslims to take over your country, just like there’s nothing Muslim about not wanting Zionists to control your country. Infowars is anti-Zionist recently, and Alex condemns what Israel and Netanyahu are doing. But there’s a deliberate message of unity of all Americans who aren’t trying to dominate or subvert others. Unless they’re Christians, of course. Smith: So you’re saying you’re not arguing for a single team; it’s two enemies, rock, paper, scissors? Harrison: It’s two enemies, not one. I’m against both. I’m against Muslims taking over and against Zionists dominating. It’s not contradictory. It’s not about a single team. Smith: The point isn’t that you must pick sides; the issue is you’ve pushed claims that there is a Muslim takeover, which isn’t supported by numbers or power. People argue this is propaganda. Harrison: Okay. I don’t care whether the takeover has progressed. If I said it’s fake, I’d say that. I’ve got to go, but I appreciate the clarification. Smith: Posted on the day Jake Lang went; you were clearly talking about him. Harrison: I was talking about why Dearborn was the location of the march and why it was appropriate. Jake Lang is Jewish and Zionist; he’s not a Christian. He’s ethnically Jewish. He says he’s Christian, and in Christianity you can convert. I’ll call him a Christian man if that’s how he defines himself. Thanks.

He will create a false equivalency between Charlie Kirk and the murder of the Hortmans in Minnesota. That's provably untrue. Melissa Hortman, the Democratic state legislator in Minnesota last three months ago, gunned down by an anti abortion Trump supporter. Yes or no? Wrong. How do I know? Because Vance Bolter, the man who did it, wrote in his letter that it had nothing to do with Trump or being pro life. He blamed Tim Walls. Did you see anyone celebrating the death of them gleefully? Did you see so many professors doing so, showing children a snuff? spitting at their vigil. Joe Walsh will say that this is an overreaction. From the moment Charlie Kirk was assassinated, I said, we don't know who did it. All of this is by design so that the left and spineless right can make this conversation about conservatives responding to the cold blooded terroristic assassination... And maybe if I would have picked up the phone, maybe Charlie would have had a fighting chance.

The speaker says they were glad that Charlie Kirk was murdered, responding immediately at work with “Good! Fuck that Nazi white supremacist piece of shit!” and describing an uncomfortable silence afterward. They later say the look on their coworker’s face haunts them, and that a follow-up question became psychologically impactful: “Have you ever actually watched any of his debates?” The speaker claims they dismissed the person as intellectually dishonest and admits they had not watched Kirk’s debates. They say their beliefs about Kirk were based on “thousands of hours” of recordings using a limited set of out-of-context clips curated by algorithms and by media organizations funded by the political opposition. They also describe mocking those saddened by Kirk’s death and downplaying it by repeating the idea that “Political violence is just an unfortunate yet necessary step toward our coveted socialist revolution.” They say they began noticing a common thread: the same repeated comment in nearly every online space—“Have you ever actually watched any of his debates?” They initially interpret it as routine right-wing regurgitation and a “cult” dynamic. They describe clicking a random YouTube thumbnail of Kirk to reaffirm preconceived biases, calling it an attempt to confirm what they already believed. On the same day, they say it became an unusually stressful afternoon when they spoke to their father for the first time in years, after years of their father supporting and loving them unconditionally. They then describe an sleepless night as they come to terms with the idea that what they thought they hated about the right—bigotry, stupidity, violence, vitriol, and narrow-mindedness—was actually “an outward projection of hatred toward my own self.” They conclude by stating “Charlie Kirk is my hero,” saying he “opened my eyes” to the “cruel and manipulative nature” of their political media, “brought my family back together,” and “taught [them] how to love again.” They end by challenging others who take issue or offense to answer the same question: “Have you ever actually watched any of his debates?”

The discussion centers on stories of teachers and others at schools being canceled or fired for saying it was justified that Charlie Kirk got assassinated. The speaker says the most shocking part is that the people who spoke that way believed they wouldn’t get fired, living in a bubble of reality. They imagine they’re in a world where "Hitler was an American" and ask, "Would you feel bad about saying thank God Hitler died?" They call these people "hypnotized Hitlerians"—believers that Hitler actually came to power in the United States because "so many bad people on the left" have been saying that. The speaker expresses unusual empathy, suggesting they think they’re in a different reality, likely due to leftist rhetoric; "the Hitler stuff" is treated as literal. The canceled individuals are described as responsible but also victims, "hypnotized" to believe something horrific.

I think the one thing that I did not expect to see in regards to the aftermath of Charlie Kirk are all of the colleges who are cracking down on educators who are promoting political violence. Like, my alma mater MTSU fired an assistant dean of students because she said something nasty about the passing of Charlie Kirk. Sidney McPhee put out a statement saying she is no longer working here. And other colleges have done it too. I've seen several that have fired their teachers or administrators or anybody who is out there running their jaw about Charlie Kirk or being happy or celebrating or anything. I'm happy that these colleges are standing up and saying no. That kind of ideology is so woke and so gross. It has no place here.

We had our disagreements. Where we did agree is that he would go to these college campuses and proclaim the name of Jesus Christ. And ultimately, that is why he was killed. The gunmen that killed him, they hated him because of his defense of Christian morality. Charlie Kirk cannot call himself a Christian anymore. Sorry, you forfeited that. I do not wanna hear and you cannot allow Charlie Kirk to go to one more public event, one more question and answer, one more ask me anything without being protested, without being shouted down, without being interrogated about this. This guy goes around from campus to campus in the most artificial and phony and fake way talking about, oh, God, God made me very blessed that I control $500,000,000. And then you go around from campus to campus making excuses for a famine?

"Charlie Kirk should not have been assassinated." "That's what I said that caused tens of thousands of Democrats to come into my comments and mentions literally hurling homophobic slurs at me." "The ultimate irony is that that's the reason why you justify the assassination of Charlie Kirk was because he was such a bigot and he said all these horrible things, which aren't even real quotes, by the way." "You hate him for things he never even said." "Meanwhile, you guys are actively saying things that are infinitely worse than anything that Charlie Kirk said." "And you guys don't see it." "You don't have that ability to self reflect." "You have no ability to self reflect." "You guys you guys can literally sit there being the nastiest, meanest, most cruel hearted people ever and genuinely believe that you're the good guy because you're doing it to bad people." "Oh, yeah. What is wrong with you?"