TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker describes a Henry Ford Medical Center study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children (2000–2016). Dr. Marcus Servis agreed to conduct it, recruiting a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians. Using medical records, the study followed about sixteen thousand vaccinated and two thousand unvaccinated children and aimed to show the CDC vaccine schedule is safe to reduce vaccine hesitancy. Findings showed higher rates in the vaccinated group for several conditions: four point two nine times asthma, three point zero three times atopic disease, five point nine six times autoimmune disease, and five point five three times neurodevelopmental disorders. ADHD: two hundred sixty cases in the vaccinated group, none in the unvaccinated. After ten years, seventeen percent of the unvaccinated had a chronic health issue versus fifty seven percent of the vaccinated. The study’s publication was blocked because its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe.

Less than 1% of the public consists of unvaccinated children. The Amish community is a prime example of a large group with low vaccination rates. It is extremely rare to find autistic, ADD, autoimmune disease, PANDAS, or epilepsy cases among the Amish. The U.S. Government has been studying the Amish for years but has not released any reports to the public. This is likely because it would reveal that not following vaccination guidelines leads to better health. The CDC would be implicated in harming the public for decades if such a report were published.

Speaker 0 argues that to determine whether smoking causes lung cancer, you must compare smokers to non-smokers. They recount a sequence of flawed study designs that would falsely conclude no link: comparing two smokers with different consumption levels and finding the same cancer rates; comparing different cigarette brands among smokers and again finding no difference; comparing people in different towns who all smoke and finding no difference. The point is that all these comparisons fail because they do not include a non-smoker control group; thus they cannot establish causation. They then contrast this with vaccine studies, asserting that studies claiming vaccines don’t cause chronic diseases or autism do not compare vaccinated to unvaccinated children. Instead, such studies compare vaccinated children to other vaccinated children, with variations in vaccines received (e.g., MMR, DTaP, multiple vaccines in one visit) and with differing aluminum exposures (e.g., four milligrams vs two milligrams). They emphasize that these studies never examine the actual outcome of interest by comparing vaccinated against unvaccinated children. The speaker maintains that this flaw in vaccine studies mirrors the earlier tobacco example. The essential argument is that the only way to determine causation is to compare the exposure group (vaccinated children) to an appropriate control group (unvaccinated children). They reference the Henry Ford trial as an example of an unvaccinated-versus-vaccinated comparison, but note that no one has published or accessible data from it. They call for someone brave enough to conduct and publish a vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated study to settle the issue. Finally, they challenge proponents of vaccination to conduct such a study to prove their position, insisting that if vaccines are truly safe and non-causal for chronic diseases or autism, the study should be done and the data published to demonstrate that the claim is correct. The overall message is a insistence on direct, unambiguous vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated comparisons to establish causality, highlighting perceived gaps in current vaccine research and urging transparent data publication.

Many unvaccinated people are parents who followed recommendations blindly. Less than 1% of the public is unvaccinated. The Amish community is largely unvaccinated, yet there are very few cases of autism, ADD, autoimmune diseases, and other chronic illnesses. The US government has studied the Amish for years but has not released any reports because it would reveal that not following vaccination guidelines leads to better health. This suggests that the CDC has been withholding data that shows their recommendations may harm the public.

Fully vaccinated children have a 5 times higher rate of autism compared to fully unvaccinated children, as shown in multiple studies. A study by James Lyons Wyler and Paul Thomas found very few cases of autism in unvaccinated children. Another study by Joy Garner's Control Group in 2022 revealed a 10 times higher autism rate in vaccinated children compared to unvaccinated children nationwide. Vaccinated children following the CDC schedule show a higher prevalence of autism.

In 1999, the CDC, concerned about mercury in vaccines causing autism, studied the hepatitis B vaccine, which is high in mercury, given to infants within their first 30 days. They compared these infants to those who received the vaccine later or not at all. The study revealed a relative risk of 11.35, higher than smoking a pack of cigarettes a day for 20 years. This alarming finding led to a secret two-day meeting at Simpsonwood, a remote retreat center. Attendees included major vaccine companies, regulatory agencies like WHO, CDC, FDA, NIH, HHS, and leading academic vaccinators. Someone recorded the meeting, and transcripts I acquired in 2005 revealed that these regulators, who are supposed to protect us, acknowledged the science was "bulletproof" in that mercury was causing autism. The transcripts are available on the Children's Health Defense website.

The speaker claims epidemiological studies are easily manipulated and that proper studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated groups are lacking, except for a CDC study in 1999. This CDC study, led by Thomas Verstraten, allegedly compared children who received the hepatitis vaccine within the first thirty days of life to those vaccinated later or not at all. The speaker asserts the study found a 1,135% elevated risk of autism in vaccinated children, which "shocked" researchers. The speaker alleges the CDC then kept the study secret and manipulated it through five iterations to bury the link.

All vaccines, including COVID vaccines, are causing harm to children. There has never been a study comparing fully vaccinated kids following the CDC schedule to unvaccinated kids. The difference in health outcomes between these two groups is dramatic, with unvaccinated kids being consistently healthier. A 10-year study by Dr. Paul Thomas, which was retracted unethically, showed that vaccinated kids were more likely to get the diseases they were vaccinated against. A study by the control group with over 1,000 unvaccinated people also revealed significantly better health outcomes compared to fully vaccinated individuals. Despite promises, the CDC has never conducted a study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. No vaccine is safe or effective, and no study has been able to prove otherwise.

The speaker claims that the CDC commissioned six epidemiological studies using fraudulent techniques, instead of comparing health outcomes between fully vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. According to the speaker, a 1999 CDC study led by Thomas Verstraten compared children who received the hepatitis vaccine within their first thirty days of life to those vaccinated later or not at all. This study allegedly found a 1,135% elevated risk of autism among vaccinated children. The speaker states that the CDC kept the study secret and manipulated it to bury the link by removing older children and stratifying the data. The speaker asserts that over 100 external studies indicate a link between vaccines and autism.

Autism is caused by vaccines, according to the speaker. The CDC's VirTrak study from 1989 showed a 1350% elevated risk for autism among children who received the hepatitis B vaccine in their first 30 days. A series of 13 studies were allegedly done by people paid by the CDC to create the illusion that vaccines don't cause autism. The chief scientist, Paul Thornsen, is a fugitive wanted by Interpol for stealing millions from the CDC that he claimed to use for the study. His study is considered fraudulent but has not been retracted. The speaker claims there are hundreds of studies linking autism and neurological injuries to vaccines, citing a book with 1,400 references and over 400 studies. The speaker believes the CDC is a dishonest organization owned by the pharmaceutical industry and promotes propaganda that vaccines don't cause autism.

Less than 1% of the public is unvaccinated. The Amish community is largely unvaccinated, yet there are very few cases of autism, ADD, autoimmune disease, panda pans, or epilepsy among them. The US government has studied the Amish for years but has not released any reports to the public because it would reveal that not following vaccination guidelines leads to better health. This would contradict the CDC's narrative and expose their harm to the public.

In 1989, there was a significant rise in autoimmune diseases, including juvenile diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and lupus, which were rarely seen before. The CDC investigated a potential link to the hepatitis B vaccine given within the first 30 days of life. They found a staggering 1135% increased risk of autoimmune disorders in vaccinated children compared to those who received the vaccine later or not at all. Recognizing the gravity of this finding, key figures from the vaccine and pharmaceutical industries convened at a remote retreat to discuss the implications. Initially, they expressed concern about legal repercussions and the undeniable nature of the evidence. However, discussions quickly shifted to strategies for concealing this information from the public.

Many children and people are unvaccinated, but it's a small percentage as most of us blindly follow vaccination recommendations. The Amish community is a large group that is largely unvaccinated, yet it's very rare to find an autistic or chronically ill child among them. The US government has been studying the Amish for decades, but there's no public report because it would reveal that not following vaccination guidelines leads to better health. This would expose the CDC's harm to the public for years without disclosure.

Mainstream media claims that the link between autism and vaccines has been debunked through studies. However, these studies only examined the MMR vaccine and thimerosal. The Institute of Medicine stated that vaccines administered during the first six months of life have never been studied for a link to autism. The vaccines given in the first six months include DTaP, hep B, and pneumococcal. The only vaccine studied was DTaP, and the study showed a link to autism. However, the Institute of Medicine discounted the study because it was based on the CDC's VAERS system, which they deemed too unreliable for studying vaccine injury. They stated that the CDC's only surveillance system is inadequate for conducting reliable studies.

Only about 1% of the population is unvaccinated, with the Amish being a notable example. In the Amish community, it is extremely rare to find unvaccinated children with conditions like autism, ADD, autoimmune disease, pandapans, or epilepsy. The US government has been studying the Amish for years, but no public reports have been released. It is believed that these reports would reveal that not following vaccination guidelines leads to better health. The lack of reports suggests that the CDC has been withholding data and potentially harming the public.

The CDC conducted a study in 1999, led by Thomas Verstraten, comparing health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated children. The study examined children who received the hepatitis vaccine within the first 30 days of life against those vaccinated later or not at all. The initial findings revealed an 1135% elevated risk of autism among vaccinated children. The researchers were shocked and allegedly kept the study secret. The study was manipulated through five iterations to bury the link. Older children were removed from the data, focusing on younger children too young for diagnosis. Data was stratified, and other unspecified tricks were employed.

The CDC initially found a link between mercury-containing vaccines and autism, leading to a cover-up of data. A study on the MMR vaccine also showed a higher risk of autism. The CDC manipulated data, destroyed evidence, and published fraudulent studies to deny the vaccine-autism link. A con man named Paul Thorsen was involved in one of the studies and is now a fugitive. The rise in autism cases in Denmark post-1993 was due to changed reporting requirements, not an actual increase in cases. The CDC exploited this to support their claim that vaccines do not cause autism.

How many people are completely unvaccinated? It's a small percentage, less than 1%. The Amish community is a notable example, as they largely remain unvaccinated and show very low instances of autism, ADD, autoimmune diseases, and epilepsy. Despite decades of study by the U.S. Government, no public reports have been released. This lack of information likely stems from the potential to undermine the narrative that following vaccination guidelines leads to better health. The absence of such reports suggests that the CDC may have been withholding data that could indicate that not following their recommendations could result in better health outcomes.

A well-respected nurse practitioner shared a transcript of a secret meeting involving 52 vaccine industry officials and representatives from regulatory agencies like the FDA and CDC. This meeting was held off-campus to avoid freedom of information requests. They discussed a study using the Vaccine Safety Datalink, which analyzed hepatitis B vaccinations given within the first 30 days of life. The study found that children vaccinated during this period had an 1135% higher chance of later autism diagnoses. Autism rates have dramatically increased, from 1 in 10,000 in previous generations to 1 in 34 today. The meeting's transcript was published in Rolling Stone and Salon, but both outlets later withdrew the articles, marking the start of a conflict with the pharmaceutical industry.

- In 02/2002, CDC did an internal study of Atlanta Fulton County, Georgia children, looked at children who got the MLR vaccine on time and compared those to kids who got them later. So in other words, kids who got them before thirty six months and kids who got them afterward. - The data from that study showed that black boys who got the vaccine on time had a two sixty percent greater chance of getting an autism diagnosis than children who waited. - The chief scientist on that, Doctor. William Thompson, the senior said vaccine safety science at CDC, was ordered to come into a room with four other co authors by his boss, Frank DeSteveno, who's the head of the immunization safety press, and ordered to destroy that data. - And then they published it without that fact.

In 1989, there was a sudden rise in autoimmune diseases like juvenile diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, and obesity. The CDC investigated the hepatitis B vaccine's role in this increase. They found that children vaccinated within the first 30 days had an 1135% increased risk of autoimmune diagnoses compared to those vaccinated later or not at all. Recognizing the significance of this finding, the CDC held an emergency meeting at a remote retreat to discuss the study. The first day focused on the undeniable evidence and potential legal repercussions, while the second day was dedicated to strategies for concealing the information from the public. Excerpts from the meeting were later published, highlighting the tension between acknowledging the findings and the desire to suppress them.

The speaker states that previous CDC studies on autism were epidemiological and designed to avoid finding a link. They claim the Institute of Medicine criticized the CDC's vaccine schedule decision-making, alleging the ASIP panel was captured by industry due to financial entanglements. The speaker says the Institute of Medicine recommended various studies, including animal models, which the CDC allegedly ignored, opting instead for manipulated epidemiological studies. They claim these studies didn't compare fully vaccinated to unvaccinated groups. According to the speaker, a 1999 CDC study led by Thomas Verstraten found an 1135% elevated autism risk in vaccinated children. They allege the CDC concealed and manipulated this study to bury the link by removing older children from the data and using other statistical tricks. The speaker asserts that over 100 external studies indicate a link between vaccines and autism.

Many unvaccinated children are found in the Amish community, where chronic diseases like autism, ADD, autoimmune diseases, and epilepsy are rare. The U.S. Government has studied the Amish for decades but has not released any reports to the public, likely because it would reveal that not following vaccination guidelines leads to better health. This suggests that the CDC may have been withholding data that shows their recommendations may harm the public.

Only a small percentage of people, less than 1%, are totally unvaccinated. The Amish community is largely unvaccinated, and there are very few cases of autism, ADD, autoimmune diseases, pandapans, or epilepsy among them. The US government has studied the Amish for years but has not released any reports because it would contradict the narrative that following vaccination guidelines leads to better health. This suggests that the CDC may have been withholding data that shows harm caused by vaccines.

The CDC conducted a study in 1999, led by Thomas Verstraten, comparing health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated children. The study examined children who received the hepatitis vaccine within the first 30 days of life versus those vaccinated later or not at all. The initial findings revealed an 1135% elevated risk of autism among vaccinated children. The researchers were shocked and allegedly kept the study secret. The study was manipulated through five iterations to bury the link. Older children were removed from the data, focusing on younger children too young for diagnosis. The data was stratified, and other tricks were employed.