reSee.it - Related Video Feed

This video discusses the history of coronavirus research, highlighting its origins in 1965 and the development of spike protein vaccines by Pfizer in 1990. The speaker emphasizes the long-standing manipulation of pathogens for various purposes and questions the ethical implications of these actions. The conversation urges listeners to consider the implications of such research on humanity's future.

The speaker begins by discussing the loss of public accountability and the assault on liberties. They mention the funding of coronavirus research in 1966 and the establishment of a mandate for a universal vaccine by 2020. The speaker questions the need for a vaccine for an eradicated disease and suggests that there may be a conspiracy to commit acts of terror. They provide evidence of patents and statements indicating the weaponization of coronaviruses. The speaker accuses the World Health Organization and various foundations of criminal collusion and points out the involvement of MI5. They conclude by stating that the current situation is a marketing ploy to deprive people of their liberty.

The speaker reflects on their previous warnings about the weaponization of nature and the dire consequences it has had. They express gratitude for the opportunity to have a public conversation about this issue. They acknowledge their wife's role in encouraging them to share their information. The speaker then delves into the history of coronavirus, highlighting its manipulation and patenting since 1965. They discuss the violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties and the ineffectiveness of vaccines. They emphasize the intentional release of a respiratory pathogen and the push for a universal vaccine template. The speaker concludes by calling for an end to gain of function research and corporate patronage of science without assuming product liability.

The speaker reflects on their past warnings about the militarization of nature and the consequences of allowing patents on biological materials. They express gratitude for the opportunity to have this conversation and emphasize the importance of discussing who we want to be as a society. The speaker discusses the history of coronavirus research, including its isolation in 1965 and subsequent manipulation for various purposes. They highlight the unethical actions of organizations like Pfizer and the CDC, who patented the virus and vaccines. The speaker calls for an end to gain-of-function research, the militarization of nature, and corporate influence in science. They emphasize the need for accountability for any negative effects caused by vaccines.

The speaker presents evidence suggesting that the events of the past four years were orchestrated to infringe on people's liberties. They claim that the manipulation of coronaviruses began in 1966 and that various organizations colluded to establish a mandate for a universal vaccine by 2020. The speaker questions the need for a vaccine for a disease that was declared eradicated. They argue that this is an act of domestic and international terrorism. The speaker also highlights patents and statements indicating the weaponization of coronaviruses. They assert that there was a planned release of a respiratory pathogen in 2019.

The speaker reflects on their past warnings about the weaponization of nature and the dire consequences it has had on humanity. They express gratitude for the opportunity to have a public conversation about this issue. They discuss the history of coronavirus, including its isolation in 1965 and subsequent modifications and experiments. They highlight the unethical actions of organizations like the CDC and the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, who patented and manipulated the virus. They emphasize the need to end gain of function research and corporate influence in science. The speaker concludes by calling for accountability and a halt to the weaponization of nature.

The speaker begins by discussing the loss of public accountability and the assault on liberties. They mention the funding of coronavirus research in 1966 and an agreement between the US and UK in 1967 to modify and manipulate the virus. They argue that this orchestrated assault on liberties has been happening for 56 years. They also mention a mandate established in 2011 for a universal vaccine by 2020. The speaker accuses various foundations and organizations of colluding to create a public health emergency for profit. They discuss patents filed in 2002 for a weaponized coronavirus and the use of the term "biological warfare enabling technology." The speaker claims that the World Health Organization predicted a release of respiratory medicine in 2019. They conclude by accusing MI5 of being involved in the distribution of the virus and discussing previous instances of crises being used to justify vaccine immunity and corporate immunity.

The speaker begins by discussing the loss of public accountability and the assault on liberties. They mention the funding of coronavirus research in 1966 and the establishment of a mandate for a universal vaccine by 2020. The speaker questions the need for a vaccine for an eradicated disease and suggests that there may be a conspiracy to commit acts of terror. They provide evidence of patents and statements indicating the weaponization of coronaviruses. The speaker accuses the World Health Organization and other organizations of criminal collusion and involvement in the distribution of the COVID campaign. They conclude by stating that this is a marketing ploy to deprive people of liberty.

The speaker discusses the development of vaccines and raises concerns about a specific type of research called gain-of-function. They suggest that this research involves making viruses more dangerous and could potentially be used to create bio weapons. They mention that Anthony Fauci, a prominent figure in the field, received a raise for his involvement in this research. In 2014, three dangerous viruses escaped from labs in the US, leading 300 scientists to urge President Obama to shut down Fauci's gain-of-function research. Although a moratorium was issued, the research was moved offshore, including to a Chinese lab in Wuhan.

Over a decade ago, the speaker warned about the weaponization of nature and the dire consequences it would have. They believe that the current situation presents an opportunity for a public conversation on who we want to be as humanity. The speaker acknowledges their involvement in sharing information about the pandemic, thanks the parliament members and translators, and mentions their loss of fame in mainstream media. They provide a historical context, stating that coronavirus was isolated in 1965 and has been modified and studied since then. They highlight the violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties and laws, as well as the ineffectiveness of vaccines against coronavirus. The speaker accuses organizations like EcoHealth Alliance and DARPA of funneling money through Anthony Fauci and engaging in gain-of-function research. They argue that coronavirus was engineered and patented as a bioweapon, and call for an end to gain-of-function research and corporate patronage of science without assuming product liability.

The speaker discusses gain-of-function research, claiming that the purpose of taking a wild virus and making it more pathogenic is to develop a vaccine for those enhanced viruses, and that the real rationale is to develop bioweapons and then a defense to those bioweapons. They assert that Anthony Fauci received a 68% raise by the military because of these new military responsibilities and continued the work through 2014. The speaker states that in 2014 three of the bugs escaped in high-profile incidents from three different U.S. labs, describing these as really deadly bugs that escaped or were found in unsafe circumstances. They claim that 300 scientists sent a letter to President Obama asking him to shut down Fauci’s gain-of-function research, arguing that it was highly likely to start a global pandemic with this dangerous research. According to the speaker, Obama issued a moratorium and shut down 18 of Fauci’s worst projects, but ultimately did not fully shut them down. Instead, the research was moved offshore to avoid White House scrutiny and the Cambridge Working Group, a group of scientists, as well as other officials. The speaker alleges that the major offshore location for this research included a Chinese lab run by the Chinese military, specifically naming the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China, as part of the moved research, with other work relocated to Ukraine and the former Soviet state of Georgia.

The speaker reflects on their past warnings about the weaponization of nature and the dire consequences it has had on humanity. They express gratitude for the opportunity to have a public conversation about this issue. The speaker then delves into the history of coronavirus, highlighting its manipulation and modification for various purposes since 1965. They discuss the patenting of infectious replication-defective clones of coronavirus, the failure of vaccines against coronavirus, and the involvement of organizations like Pfizer and the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. The speaker accuses the CDC of violating biological and chemical weapons treaties and laws. They conclude by calling for an end to gain-of-function research and corporate-controlled science.

Coronavirus has been a biological weapon since 1966, with Pfizer patenting a vaccine in 1990. The virus was modified in 1999 to cause harm, leading to a deadly pathogen being released in 2019. The US government funds these programs through universities, but politicians refuse to address it. Lying to Congress is illegal, whether about the virus origin or gain of function research. The fight for liberty against new threats like bird flu is crucial, as humans crave freedom. This battle is World War 3, with the reward being recognition for our efforts.

The speaker begins by discussing the loss of public accountability and the assault on liberties. They mention the funding of coronavirus research in 1966 and an agreement between the US and UK in 1967 to modify and manipulate the virus. They argue that this was part of a larger plan to establish a universal vaccine by 2020. The speaker accuses various organizations of colluding to profit from the pandemic and suggests that the virus was intentionally released. They also mention previous instances of crises being used to justify vaccine immunity and corporate protection. The speaker concludes by stating their commitment to fighting for liberty.

Speaker 0 argues that the world has been lied to for 110 years by a small group of criminal industrial conspirators who aim to subjugate humanity to enrich themselves, impoverish and kill others, and that the words “acceptable death rate” have become an industrial norm. They claim this is not just a political disagreement but a crime, asserting that the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies authorized to begin the process of killing human beings in the interest of advancing their goals. The speaker declares this is a criminal cartel and states they will show documents proving it, insisting this is not an allegation but something that is provable by their own words. The four-step process alleged for executing nefarious plans is: 1) they begin by planning an exercise, 2) they fund that exercise, 3) they create the rationale for what they will do, and 4) they deploy and profit from it. They claim this violates 15 U.S. code section 19 (and connect it to the Clayton Act and the early formation of WHO in 1947), and they claim violation of the TFEU (the treaty for the functioning of the European Union), asserting Article 101 sets out that this was never public health but racketeering to instill terror to adapt population behavior. Data from Zurich is used to argue there was no pandemic: the speaker notes that during the death pandemic of the globe, life insurance claims fell by $30,000,000,000, stating that the data is unambiguous and that there was genocide rather than a pandemic. They pivot to the 2011 WHO, Welcome Trust, PATH, and Gates Foundation malaria vaccine program for children under six months, highlighting that 66 children in the vaccine group were murdered and 28 in the control group were murdered, with the control described as a cocktail of pathogenic injections rather than saline. The speaker references Article five, section 13, claiming immunity from arrest or legal process was designed as permanent immunity for a criminal organization formed in 1947; they connect the first WHO director general, Renee Sand (sic) from the Dachau-era milieu, to Brock Chisholm, who allegedly advocated population control as a primary objective. The claim extends to funding and influence: Gates Foundation allegedly provides 88% of WHO’s foundation donations, which the speaker says constitutes a tax and competition law violation in Europe and the United States. The four-step process is illustrated again with sourcing: to sustain funding beyond the crisis, to increase public understanding for medical countermeasures like pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccines, and to use media hype to attract investors who see profit at the end of the process, as documented by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board and Peter Daszak’s partnerships. The 2014 Rand Paul–Anthony Fauci correspondence is cited, showing a letter from NIAID to UNC Chapel Hill stating that gain-of-function research would continue during a moratorium with a budget funded by DARPA and NIH. The speaker quotes that the Wuhan virus was anticipated, citing a 2016 publication stating SARS-like Wuhan Institute of Virology virus one is poised for human emergence, implying foreknowledge and manipulation of the virus in Wuhan and UNC Chapel Hill. The talk shifts to the characterization of the work as biological warfare enabling technologies, referencing Ralph Baric’s 2005 DARPA/MITRE presentation and subsequent NIAID and DARPA funding, concluding that the project was to produce biological warfare enabling technologies rather than public health measures. They highlight substantial profits for Pfizer and Moderna from public funds and accuse the WHO of laundering money via a budget expansion request of 11%. In closing, the speaker maintains this is not a public health crime or constitutional crime, but a criminal conspiracy of criminal racketeers. They call for ending the criminal organization itself and urge everyone to destroy the WHO.

Over a decade ago, the speaker warned about the weaponization of nature and the dire consequences it would have. They believe that the current situation presents an opportunity for a public conversation on who we want to be as humanity. The speaker acknowledges their involvement in sharing information about the pandemic, thanks the members of parliament, and apologizes for any difficult terminology. They discuss the history of coronavirus research, including its isolation in 1965 and the development of vaccines in 1990. They highlight the violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties and laws, as well as the manipulation and patenting of the virus. The speaker concludes by calling for an end to gain of function research and corporate patronage of science without assuming product liability.

The speaker reflects on their previous warnings about the weaponization of nature and the dire consequences it has brought. They emphasize the importance of the current public conversation on biological patents and express gratitude for the opportunity to discuss these issues. The speaker provides a historical context, tracing the development of coronavirus as a pathogen and its manipulation for various purposes since 1965. They highlight the violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties and laws, as well as the ineffectiveness of vaccines against coronavirus. The speaker asserts that SARS was engineered and discusses the financial interests and premeditated nature behind the push for a universal vaccine template. They conclude by calling for an end to gain-of-function research and corporate-driven science without assuming product liability.

The speaker questions the theory that the origin of SARS-CoV-2 was a bat and pangolin in a Wuhan market. They mention that Moderna modified patent applications in 2019 to include the justification for a vaccine against a non-existent respiratory pathogen. The speaker emphasizes the premeditated nature of the alleged plan to create a universal vaccine template using coronavirus. They claim that this plan was discussed in September 2019 and intended to generate profit. The speaker accuses this act of being an act of domestic terrorism and biological and chemical warfare on humanity, as admitted in a 2015 National Academy of Sciences publication. The motive behind this act is said to be financial gain.

In 1965, coronavirus was identified as a pathogen that could be modified for various purposes. In 1966, the first transatlantic biological experiment using a coronavirus model was conducted. In 1967, human trials were conducted on modified coronavirus. In 1990, Pfizer filed the first patent for a spike protein vaccine for coronavirus. It was found that coronavirus mutates too quickly for vaccines to be effective. In 2002, the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill patented an infectious replication defective clone of coronavirus. The CDC filed a patent on SARS coronavirus isolated from humans in 2003. The RT PCR test for coronavirus was identified as a bioterrorism threat in 2002. Gain of function research on coronavirus was exempted from a moratorium in 2014. In 2016, a journal article stated that SARS coronavirus was poised for human emergence. In 2019, Moderna modified patent applications to include the term "accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen." The goal was to create a universal vaccine template. The intent was to use coronavirus to achieve this. The speaker concludes by calling for an end to gain of function research and corporate patronage of science without assuming product liability.

The speaker discusses the unethical actions of the CDC in patenting the SARS coronavirus, the bioterrorism threat of the RT PCR test, and the gain of function research on coronaviruses. They highlight the financial motives behind the push for a universal vaccine template and call for an end to gain of function research and corporate influence in science. The speaker emphasizes the need for moral oversight and independent review boards in scientific research.

- Speaker 0 describes a doctrine where an agent or pathogen works best as a binary weapon if followed by mass exposure with vaccines, noting the insistence on gene transfection technologies to create a peptide with a prion-catalyzing epitope and pointing out that lipid nanoparticles are highly labile and inflammatory, constituting a combination of chemical and biological warfare. - Speaker 0 adds that if this was a weapon release, it may be done and now data will reveal its effects, and expresses doubt about how much trust can be placed in normal scientific methods and institutions to relay data to the public, inviting Speaker 1’s thoughts. - Speaker 1 (Stephanie) says the discussion has been an incredible and difficult ride since things began unfolding, with questions about natural versus lab-based origins, vaccine development versus biowarfare, and concerns about funding by China for bioweapons, acknowledging the impossibility of definitively answering many questions. - Speaker 0 agrees that ambiguity is the point and calls it the strength of the weapon. - Speaker 1 asks why someone would inject something to inflict a bioweapon on the entire population, suggesting population control as a possible motivation. - Speaker 0 notes the need to consider literature from top transnational power structures and corporations, asserting that it is not hidden. - Speaker 1 recalls prior concerns about population-control vaccines, referencing reports about vaccines used in Argentina and Africa that allegedly caused infertility, describing an example where a vaccine given to teenage girls could lead to antibody development to a fetus, making infertility less detectable over time. She mentions a memory of a “benign disease” vaccination program in Argentina that led people to suspect infertility, and notes that it could be a stealth method. - Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the idea that vaccines may have had effects on fertility and reference terms like human chorionic something, with Speaker 1 acknowledging possible occurrences in India as well as Africa and Argentina. - Speaker 0 refers to bioaccumulation seen in reproductive organs and cites pharmacokinetic studies beginning in Japan, noting the vaccine’s presence in the placenta and testes and recalling reports of harmful effects on male reproductive organs. - Speaker 0 mentions Anna Burkhart’s data as dark regarding spike protein expression in reproductive organs found in autopsies, while acknowledging uncertainty about how much weight to attribute to that data, but maintaining that biowarfare cannot be dismissed. - The discussion returns to the mechanism of biowarfare being distinct from a pathogen, describing a scenario where exposure leads to effects years later due to the disease mechanism being induced, rather than immediate pathogen-driven illness.

Over a decade ago, the speaker warned about the weaponization of nature and the dire consequences it would have. They believe that the current situation presents an opportunity for a public conversation on who we want to be as humanity. They express gratitude for the chance to speak and acknowledge their wife's role in sharing their information. The speaker discusses the history of coronavirus, its manipulation, and the patents filed for vaccines. They highlight the violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties and laws. They argue that coronavirus is a bioweapon and that gain of function research should be stopped. They also call for corporate accountability in science.

The speaker begins by discussing the loss of public accountability and the assault on liberties. They mention the funding of coronavirus research in 1966 and the establishment of a mandate for a universal vaccine by 2020. The speaker questions the need for a vaccine for an eradicated disease and suggests that there may be a conspiracy to commit acts of terror. They provide evidence of patents and statements indicating the weaponization of coronaviruses. The speaker accuses the World Health Organization and various foundations of criminal collusion and points out the involvement of MI5. They conclude by stating that the current situation is a marketing ploy to deprive people of their liberty.

The speaker discusses a theory about the funding of the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the origins of the coronavirus. They mention a researcher named Ralph Barrick and his chimeric coronavirus research. They also talk about the US Center for Disease Control filing a patent on the coronavirus and its detection. The speaker suggests that the CDC had control over who could study the virus and profit from it. They imply that there may have been illegal actions involved in the manipulation of the coronavirus for monetary gain.

The speaker discusses a theory about the funding of the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the origins of the coronavirus. They mention a researcher named Ralph Barrick and his chimeric coronavirus research. They also talk about the US Center for Disease Control filing a patent on the coronavirus and its detection. The speaker suggests that the CDC had control over who could study the virus and profit from it. They imply that there may have been illegal actions involved in the manipulation and patenting of the coronavirus.