reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In a local county commissioner race, the Dominion machine results showed Lorne Alexander with 34.67%, Marshall Orson with 41.35%, and Michelle Long Spears with 23.98%. Since no candidate reached 50%, a runoff was needed. Spears found precincts where she received zero votes, including her own. A hand recount revealed discrepancies, with Spears gaining 3,620 votes. The hand count showed 2,810 more votes than the machines reported, raising concerns about the machines' accuracy. This highlights the need for trustworthy voting systems. If Spears hadn't raised concerns, the discrepancies may have gone unnoticed. Translation: In a local election, the Dominion machines initially showed Lorne Alexander and Marshall Orson leading, but Michelle Long Spears raised concerns after receiving no votes in some precincts, including her own. A hand recount revealed significant discrepancies, with Spears gaining thousands of votes. This raised doubts about the accuracy of the machines and the need for reliable voting systems. Without Spears' intervention, the issues may have gone unnoticed.

At a polling station in New Taipei City, votes are being counted after the polls closed. In Taiwan, there is no absentee voting; all voting is done in person. Volunteers are inside reciting and tallying the votes on a whiteboard. This method is seen as fair and safe, protecting Taiwan from potential interference, particularly from China. While it may not be the most efficient system compared to other countries, it has proven effective in past elections. Access to the counting area is restricted, but there’s a glimpse of the process taking place.

Ballots were allegedly found under a table in a video presented. The person who placed the table there is said to be the same person who cleared the area and claimed to stop counting. Four suitcases were seen being taken out from under the table. These separate ballots were counted when there were no witnesses present. The machines used can process 3,000 ballots per hour, and they were running for 2 hours. This raises concerns about the number of ballots processed without supervision. The video continues until around 1 a.m., showing the ongoing operation. The speaker asks if everyone has seen enough and proceeds to fast forward to 12:55 a.m.

The speaker explains that the system consists of computers, machines, and software. The machines function like thumbs, handling the ballots and envelopes. The computers, whether hardware or software, are responsible for executing instructions and providing answers. The speaker emphasizes the importance of the program's setup, execution, and verification to ensure accurate results. Additionally, they mention the significance of the input provided to the system.

A table was placed by a lady with blonde braids at 8:22 am. The same person who cleared the place later put the table there. Four suitcases were seen coming out from under the table, and one was pulled out by a gentleman in red. These separate ballots were counted when there were no witnesses and the place was cleared. Multiple machines were present for two hours, capable of processing 3,000 ballots per hour. It is unclear how many ballots went through the machines during that time without supervision.

Votes in Georgia were counted three times using paper and machines. Concerns were raised about the lack of transparency and oversight in the vote review process, especially during adjudication. The speakers emphasized the importance of open-source voting programs to ensure transparency and prevent manipulation. They highlighted the need for concrete evidence and clear processes to build trust in the election system. Open-source systems were seen as a way to increase transparency and accountability in elections.

During the election, there were several problems with the tabulator machines. Some machines broke down and had to be replaced, while incorrect information was inputted into others. The wrong files were loaded into the mainframe by the computer technician. The issues couldn't be resolved quickly, so everyone took a lunch break. Afterward, the machines were shut down and reset. New tests were conducted, and the results were printed out. The memory sticks were handed to the technician for loading into the server. Printouts were generated and compared for accuracy. County chairs signed the certification as observers, not in an official capacity, due to the problems with the test.

At 8 o'clock in the morning, a person placed a black table in the room. Later, when the place was cleared out, the same person pulled out four suitcases from under the table. These suitcases contained separate ballots that were counted without any witnesses present. With multiple machines processing around 3,000 ballots per hour for two hours, it is believed that the number of ballots processed during that time could have influenced the outcome of the race.

On election night, the results from tabulating machines appeared inaccurate. The board decided to conduct a hand recount to ensure accurate election results. The speaker questions this decision, stating they have advocated for hand recounts for twenty years.

A table was placed by a lady with blonde braids at 8:22 am. The same person who cleared the place later put the table there. Four suitcases were seen coming out from under the table, and one was pulled out by a gentleman in red. These separate ballots were counted when there were no witnesses and the place was cleared. Multiple machines were present for two hours, capable of processing 3,000 ballots per hour. The lack of supervision and adherence to rules raises questions about the number of ballots processed during that time.

A table was placed by a woman with blonde braids at 8:22 AM, and the same person who cleared the area under the pretense of stopping the count also set it up. Four suitcases were seen being pulled from under the table. Questions arise about why these ballots were separated from others and only counted when the area was cleared of witnesses. The machines can process about 3,000 ballots per hour, and with multiple machines operating for two hours, it's crucial to consider how many ballots were processed without supervision, which raises concerns about adherence to statutes and rules.

The arrival of paper at the factory is important because it should match what was sent out or greater. Discrepancies could indicate extra ballots. The high-end machines used for printing have clickers that record the exact number of ballots produced. If the clicker count doesn't match what was printed, mailed, or destroyed, there's a problem. The entire process is documented with date and time stamps, employee stamps, and paperwork. When ballots are mailed out, there are records of names, time stamps, date stamps, and financial remittance. The same applies when they are returned or put into drop boxes. Each step has a paper trail with names, dates, and timestamps. However, when all this information is reviewed, it doesn't add up.

On election night, the results from tabulating machines appeared inaccurate. The board decided to conduct a hand recount to ensure accurate election results. The speaker notes that they have been advocating for hand recounts for twenty years.

A table was placed by a lady with blonde braids at 8:22 am. The same person who cleared the area later put the table there. Four suitcases were seen coming out from under the table. A man in red pulled out one of the ballots. These separate ballots were counted when there were no witnesses. The machines can process 3,000 ballots per hour, and they were there for 2 hours without supervision. The number of ballots processed during that time is unclear.

Voting machines in Cambria County are currently not scanning ballots, but voters can still submit paper ballots. Poll workers are informing voters about the situation and how the backup system works, which has been in place since the machines were introduced. The issue seems to be affecting the entire county, but voters are still participating in the process. Ballots are being collected in a secure box and will be scanned once the machines are operational again. There are procedures in place to ensure transparency, with workers overseeing the process to maintain integrity.

The speaker witnessed someone using correction tape inside a tabulator machine, which caused the ballots to get jammed. The tape was placed back in the machine after being peeled off. The speaker explained that if a ballot goes through the machine with the tape on it, the machine won't read anything, and the user can override it. The speaker also mentioned that the ballots had no numbers at the top, but they assumed the machine wouldn't read them and the user could manually input the ticket type. The person operating the machine repeatedly put the same set of 27 ballots in instead of separating them, resulting in an inaccurate count. The speaker explained that the machine doesn't have a way to detect if the same ballot has been inserted multiple times, as the sensor and reader are covered.

- The discussion centers on ballot processing in Maricopa County, with several shipments arriving after the initial belief that counting was near completion. Speaker 0 notes that the Wednesday before the Friday they quit voting, and ten days before they quit tabulating, more truckloads of ballots came in, leading to the question: “how can you not know how many ballots are still out there?” - Speaker 1 asks for clarification: “They thought they were done.” The conversation confirms multiple times that those running the counting rooms believed they were almost done, or would be done, on Wednesday morning, then Thursday morning, then Friday morning, and the process extended into the next week. - Trucks bringing ballots arrived on the third, fourth, and fifth days, continuing throughout the last week. The last day mentioned is the tenth, with ballots still arriving. The company involved is Runback, described as doing high-speed scanning and printing of duplications and military ballots. There was no observer presence at Runback, and Speaker 0 indicates she had not been called to work there; she does not know exactly what Runback was doing (printing vs. scanning). - It is stated that all high-speed scanning occurs at Runback, and the ballots go to Runback. There is uncertainty about off-site scanning and whether Dominion equipment was involved. Speaker 0 clarifies: “They were duplications, the ballots that wouldn’t read through the tabulation machines. They were ballots that came in from military and overseas.” The number of additional sources for ballots beyond military/overseas is unknown, and Speaker 0 suggests this is a question for county employees to explain. - About the counting process: Speaker 0 confirms that the ballots went through tabulation machines and that adjudication work took place for those late arrivals. They observed the ballots being processed, but did not know the exact totals for certain days. - Daily volumes are described. Speaker 0 estimates: one day a shift might handle 90,000 ballots, and some days had similar volumes across three shifts; other days had fewer. There were days when as few as 15,000 ballots were processed. The “back door” arrivals are contrasted with the front door, with Speaker 0 noting that all back door ballots were received through back entries, not the front door. The remaining ballots in the latter part of the period continued to come in and be tabulated, with ongoing full-time shifts through the eighth, ninth, and tenth days. - The episode concludes with Speaker 1 seeking further explanation, and Speaker 0 indicating that some of the details were not fully known and that a county employee should clarify where the incoming ballots came from during the latter part of the period.

At around 8:22 AM, a person placed a black table in the room. Later, when the place was cleared out, four suitcases were taken out from under the table. The question is why these separate ballots were only counted when there were no witnesses present. The machines can process 3,000 ballots per hour, and they were there for two hours. If three scanners were working, that's 18,000 ballots. There were six people involved, and the operation continued until around 12:55 AM. The video shows the people who provided affidavits appearing at that time to check if counting was still happening. If you've seen enough, we can fast forward to 12:55 AM.

A lady with blonde braids placed a table at 8:22 AM. The same person who cleared the place out under the pretense of stopping the count also put the table there. Four suitcases came out from underneath the table. A man in red pulled one of the suitcases out. The question is, why are these ballots separate from the others, and why are they only counting them when the place is cleared out with no witnesses? The machines can process about 3,000 ballots an hour, and there were multiple machines for two hours. The question is, how many ballots went through those machines in those two hours when no one was there to supervise, consistent with statutes and rules?

During the election, there were damaged mail-in ballots that couldn't be read by scanners. The board decided to duplicate these ballots using pink highlighters. However, the highlighter couldn't be read by the scanners either, so all the duplicated ballots had to be fixed. The solution was to give workers stacks of blank mail-in ballots to individually fill in the correct ovals with a dark pen. This process went on for hours without observation until the observers confronted the deputy commissioner. Eventually, thousands of mail-in ballots were counted this way. This raises concerns about the integrity of the process.

The speakers discuss the flow of ballots and the involvement of a company called Runback. Trucks delivering ballots arrived on the third, then the fourth, and the fifth, continuing for days. The last day of the speaker’s involvement was the tenth, and trucks were still coming in. The ballots were coming from Runback, a company that does high‑speed scanning and printing of duplications, and the speaker mentions military ballots being produced or processed by Runback, though there is uncertainty about exactly what Runback was doing. When asked whether the ballots were printed or scanned off-site, the speaker is unsure. It is stated that all the high‑speed scanning occurs at Runback, and that those ballots go to Runback. There were no observers at Runback, and the speaker had not been called to work there. The question is raised about whether the scanning was done on-site at the Maricopa County structure, but the response indicates that scanning was not on-site and occurred at Runback where there are very high‑speed scanners. The question of whether Dominion equipment was involved is addressed: the ballots being scanned were not related to Dominion. The purpose of scanning the ballots in advance of tabulation on Dominion equipment is then explained: they were duplications of ballots that would not read through the tabulation machines, specifically ballots that came in from military and overseas. However, the speaker notes there were more ballots than just those, with trays of ballots being brought in, and uncertainty remains about where the rest were coming from. The speaker suggests that the remaining questions about the sources of these ballots should be answered by the county employees. In summary, the discussion centers on: a sequence of ballot deliveries over several days; Runback handling high‑speed scanning and duplications off-site; uncertainty about whether ballots were printed or scanned and by whom; the absence of observers at Runback; scanners used were not Dominion; the purpose of off-site scanning was to duplicate ballots that wouldn’t read through the tabulation machines, including military and overseas ballots; and unresolved questions about the origin of additional ballots, which require explanation from county staff. The exchange ends with a note that the remaining questions about the ballots’ origins are for the county employees to explain.

In Pennsylvania, we ensure safe, secure, and accurate elections through multiple layers of verification. Every vote has a paper record, secured and tracked under strict chain of custody. Ballots are preserved for almost two years. Local officials verify absentee and mail-in ballots, ensuring they are signed, registered, and received on time. Our ballot counting machines meet federal security standards and are regularly tested with bipartisan observers. Bipartisan poll watchers oversee the counting process, and ballots are counted by local workers. We certify election results through a careful process. Election workers confirm that each eligible voter has voted only once. Counties finalize their counts and deliver results to the state. State officials tally these votes and certify the final statewide results, backed by maintained paper records. State courts handle challenges, and automatic recounts occur in close elections. The Department of State oversees this process, typically certifying final results after the third Monday post-election.

I'm calling out the recent news story as a setup for a time hack. In Maricopa County during the 2020 election, they had 10 tally machines counting over 140,000 ballots daily. Yet, on election day, they claimed they needed 10 extra days to count, processing only 89,000 ballots the day after and then dropping to just a few thousand. A month later, they counted 140,000 ballots again. This indicates they are creating excuses and using various hacks to interfere with the election. It's crucial to maintain chain of custody for forensic audits, which is costly but necessary to prevent disqualification of evidence. We learned from 2020, and it's vital to preserve this information for future legal actions. Barcodes are scanned using a laser that checks columns for light reflection, translating them into binary code for computers.

Voting machines in Cambria County are currently not scanning ballots, but voters can still submit paper ballots. Poll workers are informing voters about the situation and the backup process, which has been in place since the machines were introduced. The issue seems to be affecting the entire county, but voters are still participating by dropping their ballots into a ballot box. Once the machines are fixed, the ballots will be scanned. There are procedures in place to ensure transparency, with poll workers monitoring the process to maintain integrity.

A person placed a table at 8:22 AM, under which 4 suitcases of ballots were found. The ballots were counted without witnesses present, raising concerns about the process. With machines capable of processing 3,000 ballots per hour, multiple machines ran for 2 hours without supervision, violating rules and statutes.