reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Before 1913, Americans could veto government spending by not buying bonds. The Federal Reserve Act in 1913 allowed the government to borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank without needing public approval. This created an unlimited credit line, bypassing the people's economic veto power. Now, the government can borrow without collateral, unlike individuals who need collateral to borrow money from a bank.

Politicians promise more "free stuff," leading to deficit spending, where the government spends more than it earns. To cover this, the Treasury borrows money by issuing bonds, which are essentially IOUs. These Treasury bonds constitute the national debt, requiring repayment by current and future taxpayers through taxation. Therefore, issuing bonds allows the government to spend today by stealing prosperity from the future. The Treasury then conducts a bond auction involving the world's largest banks.

Government has two main ways to raise money without increasing taxes: borrowing from the money market, which raises interest rates, or printing more money, both of which lead to inflation. Inflation is not just high prices; it reflects a decrease in the value of money when the money supply grows faster than the availability of goods and services. Wars often exacerbate inflation as production shifts to weapons rather than consumer goods. Raising taxes could alleviate the need to borrow or print money, but the public's tolerance for tax increases has been exceeded. Historically, people worked about a month to pay taxes; now it’s four months. Shifting the tax burden to businesses is ineffective, as they pass costs, including taxes, onto consumers. Ultimately, only individuals bear the tax burden.

The US financial situation has some symptoms that are difficult to diagnose. Many believe the problem is high taxes, and while US taxes are indeed very high, that's not the core issue. The real problem is that even with high taxes, they aren't truly funding the government. Instead, the government is financed by treasury bonds, largely bought by the Federal Reserve. The Fed buys these by printing money, backed by the treasury bonds themselves. Essentially, the government is financed by printing money out of thin air. One might ask, if the government can print unlimited money, why collect taxes at all? The shocking answer is that high taxes exist to maintain the illusion that you are funding the government, which you are actually not.

Federal Reserve notes are not taxable income because they are a debt. The 10.40 bonds were used to support the war effort, and although people invested in them, they were not guaranteed to get their money back. The IRS originated from the alcohol, tobacco, and firearms agency in Puerto Rico and is not part of the US government. By law, we are only supposed to pay taxes to support essential governmental services, but the current system forces us to pay for more than what we actually receive. This is like being forced to pay for 18,000 hamburgers when there are only 19 listed on the menu.

The creation of new dollars has led to a higher cost for gold and a depletion of our gold reserves. Congress allows this because they prioritize spending, often resulting in Americans working over half the year just to support government expenses. With limited options to raise taxes, Congress resorts to borrowing and creating money out of thin air. This process involves issuing treasury bills to the Federal Reserve, which can generate billions instantly. Such actions debase the currency, affecting its value and altering interest rates, ultimately harming the economy and living standards. The responsibility lies not only with the Federal Reserve but also with Congress, which drives this monetary manipulation.

Speaker 0: There is no law. And to date, nobody has been able to show that there is a law for the average American citizen working day in and day out to pay an income tax. Speaker 1: But We, The People Foundation for Constitutional Education put a full page ad in The USA Today on 07/07/2000. And within the body of that ad was a $50,000 challenge for anyone that could show the law. And to me, $50,000 is a lot of money. So I went after that and did the research based on the fact that I thought, let's put this baby to bed. I'm hearing all these rumors. You know, I'm gonna kill two birds with one stone. I'll answer these people's questions they're asking me, and then I win this $50,000. And, you know, based on the research that I did throughout the year 2000 and that I'm still doing, I have not found that law. I've asked congress. We've asked a lot of people in the IRS, IRS commissioners, helpers. They can't answer because if they answer, the American people are gonna know that this whole thing is a fraud. Speaker 2: There is no law. There is no law that requires the average American worker in the private sector to pay a direct unapportioned tax on their labor and compensation for services. There is no law. Speaker 3: I really expected that, of course, there's a law that you can point to in the law book, the code, that requires you to file a tax return. Of course, there is. I mean, I don't know what it is right then as we as he was speaking to me, but sure. So, naively, I agreed to go off and research it and get back to him. Three and a half months later, I was at that point where I couldn't find the statute that clearly made a person liable, at least not me and, most people I know. And I had no no choice in my mind except to to resign. Speaker 4: I had to leave the IRS because I presented, evidence that I had accumulated indicating that the agency was violating the law and violating people's rights. And I asked the agency for a response to my sincere concerns, and the answer I got was that they would not respond to my concerns and that they would, provide me with the paperwork necessary to tender my resignation. Speaker 5: You can look through the statutes and look for the law that requires you to pay. And when you do that, you can't identify a law that requires the average person in America who earns a wage and works in private business to pay an income tax. Speaker 2: American citizens, along with the foundation, have been asking the IRS to specifically provide them with the the underlying legal foundation upon which they administer and enforce the personal income tax laws in our country. Speaker 3: At the national level, when people would attempt to contact somebody of a much higher authority, say the cons the commissioner, same kind of thing. They wouldn't get they would get answers that were in effect non answers. Speaker 6: You have to understand that an agency which will unlawfully impose a tax that doesn't exist it's not gonna care. If we, the people, don't know what our rights are, they're not gonna tell us. Speaker 4: If Americans just learned that the IRS was actually knowingly deceiving them, that that enough that would be enough for them to rise up and put a stop to it. Speaker 7: 100% of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the federal debt. All individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services taxpayers expect from government. People have been told, you know, that you need this income tax system to fund government, is absolutely ridiculous. I mean, my question is, well, if that's true, how did we fund government from 1776 to 1913? Speaker 8: The main purpose of the income tax is not to raise revenue, but to redistribute wealth and to control society. And a lot Speaker 9: of people might say, well, gee, if there wasn't an income tax, what would happen to education? They don't understand that education is paid for, for the most part, out of state and local taxes, your property tax. People might say, well, how are we going to build and maintain our highways if there's no money coming into the government? We need our highways. There is a tax on every gallon of gasoline that people buy. Proceeds from the income tax do not pay for highway construction. Speaker 10: I believe that in both spirit and substance, our tax system has come to be un American. Death and taxes may be inevitable, but unjust taxes

For 137 years, America had no federal income tax until the 16th amendment in 1913. Abraham Lincoln tried during the Civil War, but it was deemed unconstitutional. Despite this, America had roads and infrastructure before 1913, as shown by the Brooklyn Bridge, New York City subway, Broadway, Penn Station, Grand Central Station, 5th Avenue, Grand Army Plaza, and Wall Street. Public schools may not emphasize this history.

The transcript argues that a global cabal, financed by the Rothschilds, orchestrated major upheavals to destabilize nations and expand their power. Key claims include: - The Russian Revolution was a cabal revenge on Russia, financed by the Rothschilds, with Lenin (Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov) as their frontman. Lenin, though Russian, was described as westernized after years in exile, and heavily influenced by Karl Marx, who was German. The text claims Marx’s Jesuit background and Jesuit influence on Lenin, citing various sources: Marx trained in a Jesuit school, tutored by Jesuits at the British Museum on the Tenets of Communism (as asserted by ex-Jesuit Alberto Rivera); Otto von Bismarck’s reference to Marx being under Jesuit control via Peter Bex; and that Lenin’s right-hand man, Felix Jorzynski, admired the Jesuits. It states Lenin formally readmitted the Jesuits into Russia in 1922, despite religion being prohibited in communism, and asserts the Jesuits’ origin of communism through Paraguay’s 17th–18th century reductions as a model of communist governance. The New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia is cited to describe Jesuit-inspired communal land and property arrangements, and the text claims the term “social justice” was invented by the Jesuit Luigi Taparelli Dazellio. Lenin is labeled a Jesuit puppet intended to destabilize Russia, with quotes attributed to Lenin about Russia and freedom that embody hostility toward the state. The transcript asserts the Russian Revolution was a Jesuit attack driven by revenge, with the Bolshevists as the tool, comparing them to the Jacobins and noting millions died in 1917–1923. - A parallel narrative about events in the United States describes the Federal Reserve (founded in 1913 and controlled by cabal families including the Rothschilds) as central to global control. It claims the wealthiest opponents of the Fed died in the Titanic sinking; the Fed’s expansion of the money supply 1914–1919 led to bank failures and consolidations, and 1929’s Wall Street crash caused massive bank bankruptcies and a further contraction of credit, described as the “greatest robbery in history.” The text asserts a planned and ongoing manipulation of money supply by the Rothschilds and that Congressman McFadden was poisoned when he began impeachment proceedings against Fed bankers. It claims the 1933 gold seizure (Executive Order 6102) enabled further monetary manipulation, and asserts the income tax (established 1913) is illegal. - The rise of Adolf Hitler is presented as a Rothschild-backed manipulation: his alleged parentage is linked to Unsung Salomon von Rothschild via a possible liaison with Maria Anna Schigelkruber (and Alois Hitler’s name change). The Munich Post pamphlet alleging Jewish blood in Hitler’s veins is cited, and investigations into Hitler’s parentage are described as attempts to erase evidence of Rothschild involvement. Hitler’s alignment with Jesuit influence is emphasized, including praise for Ignatius of Loyola and the imitation of Jesuit hierarchical discipline in the SS under Himmler, with absolute obedience as a theme. The narrative claims the Nazis’ suppression of opposition and the genocide of Jews, Gypsies, and others were supported by a propagandistic machine led by Goebbels. - Postwar claims about Palestine and Israel are included: the 1917 Balfour Declaration granting a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine is described as a strategic chess move by the cabal, with Lord Rothschild and the Rothschilds as beneficiaries, enabling a later conflict between Jews and Palestinians. The text asserts the migration to Israel was planned by the cabal in 1917, and that many wars (Vietnam, Cold War) were instigated and financed on both sides by the cabal to perpetuate fear and subservience. The concluding line emphasizes the cabal’s guiding principles—hatred, revenge, disdain—and cites The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion as a guiding document.

Income taxes were nonexistent in America until 1913, yet the government functioned well. They are seen as a significant fraud against the public. Although the Constitution initially forbade income taxes, an amendment allowed them. This system shifts the burden of revenue collection onto citizens, who must complete extensive paperwork annually. Essentially, individuals do the work of providing documentation while the government simply collects the money. This situation is viewed as a clever deception on the unsuspecting public.

During the Civil War, the Constitutional Republic was replaced by the United States of America Inc, a corporation controlled by foreign insurgents. This corporation was later purchased by banking powers and the Federal Reserve in 1912. In 1933, an income tax was imposed on the people to pay off the foreign bankers who owned the IMF, which owns the IRS. The people were turned into property and collateralized to pay off a massive debt. However, there are multiple versions of the United States, and the law states that the United States is liable for all the debt. The people have been given debt notes instead of lawful money. It is important to understand common law, which is for natural beings, rather than legal law.

In 1913, the American people had direct veto power over federal spending by choosing whether or not to buy government bonds. This system kept government small until the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 created an unlimited credit line for the government to borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank, bypassing the people's economic veto power. This allowed the government to borrow without needing permission from the people, changing the system significantly.

The year was 1871, and while the events of this year have been purposefully hidden from the masses, 1871 must never be forgotten. Much like Vatican City and the City Of London, Washington, D. C. Has its own sovereignty. Basically, D.C., City Of London, and Vatican City are totally separate territories from the nations in which they reside. Vatican City is technically enclaved within Rome, outfitted with its own special police force and political structure, the same way the City Of London is situated within the city called London, and it has its own flag, crest, police force, ceremonial armed forces, and a mayor. And sure, there are states within The United States that have their own constitution and distinctive flags, but I think most people you'd ask would know that Washington, D. C. Isn't a state. Most folks would tell you that Washington, D. C. Is where our laws are made, where our politicians congregate, and where our White House resides. But on the D. C. Flag, which is said to have been reflective of George Washington's coat of arms, there are three stars. And I wonder, are those stars representative of the three city states that exist as corporate entities outside of their respective nations? Vatican City, the religious hub, the city of London, the banking central, and Washington, D. C, the military leg of the empire. Being its own city state, DC has its own police force that shares a direct link with Congress, its own mayor, and its own set of laws. But our founding father certainly didn't set it up like this. So how did it come to be? The year was 1871. The US was going through a lot of turmoil. The nation was bankrupt and vulnerable after the civil war, and the London bankers, which included the notorious Rothschild family, were ready to make a deal with congress to remedy that turmoil. Turmoil, I might add, that is suspected that the bankers had a hand in creating in the first place. At any rate, these bankers made a lot of credit available in the aftermath of the civil war as a means to, one, fight Lincoln's greenback after he was murdered, with some theorizing that part of the motivation for his assassination came from his push to privatize the monetary system. The second reason that the bankers made so much credit available was to collect on the interest from those who desperately needed the money, which would be the United States government at the time. Now, this was nothing new, this was practice as old as time. Well, as old as Mystery Babylon. Not much has really changed since the days of Babylon, not the usury, not the debt slavery, not even the iconography. Passed by Congress, the Act of 1871 provided a government for the 10 mile parcel of land known as the District Of Columbia, allowing Washington, D. C. To act as a corporation outside of the original Constitution of The United States. So, okay, why does the Washington, D. C. Constitution have nothing to do with The United States constitution? Why exactly is Washington, D. C. Totally separate from the rest of The United States? Why does it need to be separate from The United States, as a separate territory at the epicenter of the Virgin Mary, tucked right between Virginia and Maryland? The Act of 1871 changed our country's founding fathers' original constitution for The United States for America to the constitution of The United States Of America. If you blink, you might miss it because it's a mixture of impactful wording and some weird capitalization thrown in there that pretty means nothing to the average person upon initial inspection. But these subtle changes are a huge deal in the realm of legislation. Compounded with these minor changes was clever marketing of the act as a way to unify the territorial government for the entire District of Columbia. The aforementioned are contributing factors as to how such a major act flew under the radar, ultimately overturning the United States Constitutional Republic. Since 1871, the federal government has usurped nearly all of the power that was formerly held in the hands of the people. But how on earth was Congress able to pass a separate constitution and incorporate The United States? A bunch of attorneys have contacted me about this subject, explaining it to me, thank you for everyone who's done that, but let me break it down to you in a way that won't make you just totally fall asleep. A corporation, by definition, is a legal entity from its owners. A corporation protects its owners from personal liability for corporate debts and obligations within limits. So was the Act of 1871 as harmless as some claim just an act to provide a government for the District Of Columbia and nothing more? We can answer that question by simply stepping back and taking a look at the dominoes that fell after this act was passed, and asking the question: Who benefited from this piece of legislation? Is the Act of 1871 the reason why Congress passed the sixteenth amendment, which allowed the federal government to tax individual personal income regardless of state population? Is the Act of 1871 the reason why the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was passed, handing over America's gold and silver reserves and ultimately the total control of America's economy to the Federal Reserve Bank. Think about it. A private corporation established their private bank, acting as the central bank of The United States, But it isn't even a government institution, but a privately owned banking system. Is it a coincidence that social security numbers started being assigned in 1935, social security numbers being the nine digit numbers given to every U. S. Citizen, and used for income tracking and taxation purposes. Ultimately, individual income taxes have been the primary source of revenue for the U. S. Federal government since the 1950s. These moves make a lot of sense when examined through the lens of The United States as a corporation and its citizens as employees, a corporate government asset before they even go through puberty. But still, throughout all this time, there was a promise that the American dollar was actually worth something. Something tangible, not just the confidence to exchange it for goods and services. A dollar was worth one thirty fifth an ounce of gold. But then President Richard Nixon came along and screwed that up for us. Severing the final link between the dollar and gold in 1971. In other words, he took the dollar off the gold standard once and for all. Steadily, the purchasing power of the dollar has declined while federal and consumer debt has increased. Currently, we're witnessing the culmination of all of these decisions, and it ain't pretty. We're one bad flu season removed from Weimar Republic wheelbarrow money. So who would you say benefited from the Act of 1871? The average US citizen, or the bankers who incorporated The United States, who have been buying politicians ever since? The same Federal Reserve who serves absolutely no real function except stealing the purchasing power of your sixty plus hour work week and then redistributing those funds to destroy your rights and enslave you on your own soil. Hey, just like they did back in Babylon. It's the same folks using the same debt slavery system, time after time. When will we learn that debt with interest is a system of perpetual debt, and is continually passed on to the people beneath, until until the debt gap consumes all but those who own the debt? Well, like I said in the beginning of this video, the most pivotal year in United States history was never taught to me in schoolpublic or privateand never taught to me at a college level. But as Americans, it's so important that we not let this information die with our generation. One of the most important lessons you can teach your children is how to obtain their own freedomhow to identify when their freedoms are being taken from them, and how to demand those personal freedoms and liberties back, instead of waiting around for a hero in the form of a politician to represent them, to offer solutions. During this time, we've seen people of all ages crying out for change. And instead of focusing on the changes we could make that could fundamentally change The United States for the better, especially on an individual level, politicians are selling socialism and communism, aka more government control, to young people looking for an answer. And they beg for it because the future seems so bleak. Whether you play with paper or with digital money, the future will always be bleak if you're a debt slave. If before your foot even touches this earth, you're scanned into the system as an employee of this corporation who does not care about you one bit. The United States is still a great country, but it has its problems, and you know you can riot and loot and protest protest all all you you want. Want, But until the Federal Reserve is ended, until the Act of 1871 is torn into a thousand pieces and thrown into the wind, until the IRS is abolished, and until we move back to the gold standard, we have no chance at experiencing any iota of freedom.

The Federal Reserve, a private bank owned by private stockholders, controls the printing of America's money. They loan money to banks and the government, charging interest and putting the country in debt. The Fed gets its money from the United States Mint, which prints it for them. The Fed's control over the nation's wealth allows them to manipulate the economy and enslave the people through perpetual debt. In 1910, a secret meeting was held to establish a central bank, which would later be called the Federal Reserve. This secretive plan was executed on December 23, 1913, when Congress was mostly absent. The Fed's power to print money and the IRS's ability to collect taxes have resulted in the greatest theft from the American people.

During the Civil War, the United States of America, Inc. replaced the constitutional republic and later became a corporation owned by foreign banking powers. In 1933, the US went bankrupt and imposed income tax on its people to pay off the debt. This turned individuals into property, collateralized through birth certificates and social security numbers. However, there is a loophole. As property, the United States is liable for all debt, including ours. The House Joint Resolution Act 192 turned the dollar into Federal Reserve Debt Notes, making it impossible to pay off debt with debt. The United States Code 8 states that the US is responsible for all debt. We have been following legal law, but common law, based on natural rights, is a higher level of law.

Jekyll Island was the meeting place in 1910 for representatives from major private banks like the Rockefellers and Rothschilds, who secretly drafted the legislation for the Federal Reserve. Notably, the Federal Reserve was established in 1913, the same year the Internal Revenue Service was created, leading to the implementation of income tax to cover government debts to these bankers. The Federal Reserve operates as a privately owned central bank, despite being perceived as a government entity. In fact, it is listed in the white pages alongside private companies, not in the government section.

In 1894, Congress attempted to implement an income tax but it was deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. In 1913, they tried again, but the Supreme Court stated that the 16th Amendment did not grant new taxation powers. Therefore, there is no constitutional basis for taxing the wages of American citizens in the 50 states. A letter from Daniel Inouye's office confirms that there is no specific law requiring individuals to pay income tax, and no one has been able to prove otherwise.

In 1913, the Federal Reserve Act gave the US government an unlimited credit line from the Federal Reserve Bank, bypassing the people's veto power. Before this, the government had to get approval from the people by selling bonds. This system kept the government small until 1913 when they could borrow without asking the people, leading to excessive spending.

Jekyll Island, November 1910. Seven bankers meeting in secret to create America's central bank. We just can't call it that. We'll create money from nothing, loan it to the government, and charge interest. Every dollar we print steals value from existing dollars. If we ever get off the gold standard, governments can print money for wars. Endless wars become possible and profitable. Since Americans hate central banks, we'll call it the Federal Reserve. Not federal. No reserves. The president will appoint board members, but we'll pick who he appoints. We'll have 12 regional banks, looks decentralized, democratic even, but New York banks control them all. 12/23/1913, most of congress home for Christmas. Perfect timing for passing unpopular legislation. Every American born after this will inherit debt on money we created from nothing. Generational servitude. Good afternoon.

America's gold was supposed to back the dollar. Leaving the gold standard was the most costly mistake we ever made. After the world war, they promised gold backed dollars, but they broke that promise. They printed paper backed by nothing, funded wars we couldn't afford and shouldn't have been involved in. But France caught on and sent a warship to get back their gold. Truth is, if more countries followed, our vaults would be empty and game secretary of the treasury to take the action necessary to suspend temporarily the convertibility of the dollar into gold. Turns out, when you fake the money, everything else follows and you screw the next generation over. Prices shot up, paychecks didn't, life got tougher, and nobody knew why.

In 1894, the Supreme Court ruled in Pollock v. Farmers that federal income tax was unconstitutional. However, in 1913, two significant events occurred: the establishment of the Federal Reserve and the introduction of income taxes. The onset of World War I followed in 1914. By the 1930s, the government began taking income directly from paychecks through payroll taxes, a practice that was accepted by the American people. This marked a pivotal moment where citizens consented to the government withholding taxes before they received their earnings, fundamentally changing the relationship between individuals and taxation.

A central bank is an institution that issues and regulates a nation's currency. It controls interest rates and the money supply. The central bank loans money to the government with interest. This system creates debt because every dollar produced is actually the dollar plus a certain percentage of debt. The banking system has a monopoly on currency production and continually increases the money supply to cover the outstanding debt. This perpetuates more debt and creates a cycle of slavery. In the early 20th century, powerful banking families like the Rockefellers and Rothschilds pushed for the creation of another central bank. They used an incident orchestrated by JP Morgan to sway public opinion.

In 1910, influential figures like the Rockefellers, Rothschilds, and Morgans met secretly on Jekyll Island to draft legislation for the creation of the Federal Reserve. Interestingly, the same year saw the establishment of the Internal Revenue Service and the introduction of income tax, which burdened ordinary citizens with the government's debt. Surprisingly, if you search for the Federal Reserve in the Washington DC telephone book, you won't find it in the government pages but rather in the white pages alongside Federal Express. This reveals that the Federal Reserve is a privately owned central bank. Central banks are involved in banking operations.

The US government prints its own money, so why borrow in the same currency? Confusing language aside, the government sells bonds to borrow money. Despite the confusion, it's clear the government prints money and borrows, leading to debt and deficits.

Before 1913, Americans had direct control over federal spending because the government needed to sell bonds to borrow money. If citizens disagreed with a project, they simply didn't buy the bonds, keeping government size in check. This changed with the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, which provided the government with an unlimited credit line from the Federal Reserve, bypassing the public's veto power. Now, the government could borrow directly without seeking permission from the people. In traditional lending, collateral is required for loans, but this new system allowed the government to operate without the same constraints.