TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the tactical sequence surrounding a man who approached a roof and the purported loophole used to take a shot. They note a distinction between “a guy walking up and getting on a roof” and “getting on a roof” in a way that suggests exploiting a loophole. They describe a tactic of banging a hole through one side, stepping back, and shooting through that hole, creating an opportunity they characterize as a loophole. They ask for a quick description of that loophole again. They reference a site: the Lucy Center behind the Sorensen Center, and explain that from their position they cannot see that area because it is not their area of responsibility; their focus is threats directly in front of them. They estimate about 3,000 threats in front of them, with a larger backdrop described as “an 18,000 foot mountain” in front and a “36,000 foot mountain” behind, suggesting limited visibility of the broader area. They note that if the shooter had stopped slightly to the right, the Sorensen Center would have been in the way and would block the view. Speaker 1 emphasizes that it is a very specific point, not just climbing onto the roof to gain a vantage point. Speaker 0 suggests there was “blind luck” involved—no crawling, no secondary shooter stuck in the weeds; instead a “boom on, boom run to, boom take the shot.” They ask whether the event had to have been rehearsed, and Speaker 1 indicates the vantage point was roughly seven feet high, a small area that would require search for that vantage point if one didn’t know where to look. They discuss the possibility of footage existing to show how the shooter reached the point or whether he searched for it. Speaker 0 suggests that a drone could have provided footage, lamenting its absence, and jokes about wanting to deploy a drone to examine the scene. They frame these as tactical questions: their team drills include rapid movement—running 300 yards, jumping a wall, taking a shot—with an example of a 35-foot declination at 200 yards. They acknowledge that even trained shooters sometimes miss under duress, noting it’s not merely the shot itself but the broader conditions. They also compare the current shooter to “old men that shoot stuff on sandbags,” underscoring the pressure of real-world conditions.

"how did this guy know to move to that exact location?" "There was also a man that was arrested in a parking lot with an airsoft rifle." "that crazy guy screaming that he was basically a distraction?" "the best way to tell a difference between people is to look at their ear." "the ear does not is a bit different to the one we've seen of of photos of Tyler, old photos Tyler." "it's not obvious, but we don't have any positive proof here that there is a rifle in this video at all." "how did he get a rifle up on the roof?" "it's not a takedown model." "the bulge in his pocket" "12:23:34" "potato cam footage" "I didn't shoot him, I didn't do anything, I swear guys." "rifle was pre positioned at some period in time, and that he then was able to pick it off the property, and because he knew he couldn't walk all the way across, and then stash it like that as he was moving into position finally." "there's so many different people that are talking about this and it hasn't died yet." "a Twitter post the day before and ended up sharing it, the same day within hours of when Charlie Kirk got shot, that said he was attending school there, he said something very big was gonna happen the next day"

While reviewing a long video, the speaker points to the moment: "it shoots right down at a very downward angle at the back right side of his head." He identifies the device: "This part right here would be the handle, and this part right here ejects the casing after the shot is fired. Alright? And this part right here is the barrel." He adds, "the middle part I believe is a video camera." He notes, "the only gun that swivels and does the tip like that, it is called an Israeli corner shot. You should look them up." He also says, "The remote triggered, and they had video attached to them. And it could be set off from a phone and a detonator. The signal from the phone and the detonator."

According to the FBI, Tyler was positioned here and took the shot. The video they provided to us, and it's edited. It starts as Tyler's running off the roof, but this is that rooftop vent; had they given us the full video, we should have been able to see Tyler in this area with his back or with his backpack and his gear and assembling, disassembling the gun, whatever the FBI is saying. But instead, we get the video of him running off the roof. We don't get the full video. The camera was positioned somewhere right here. This is the field of view of the camera. So we've got an edited version, and I think we need to push to get the whole version.

Dude he's super brave, asshole, he took a second weapon. Basically he retrieved the weapon of the guy who if he had taken recently there yes I saw I saw, yeah. The speaker mentions “the access to the attack, brother,” and then says “no and no he is under the bridge, yeah.”

Twenty two. My daughter's 22. It's about two, two and a half inches shorter than any outstrips I own in my house. I'm a show you putting this in my pants. See this here? I got her. Right in pants now. Buttin' this shit up for you. Put the helmet on so it holds it in place a little bit and zip my crotch up. I'm a do this. I really don't really think you guys could see a gun. Can you? I mean, now just imagine me trying to go up a set of fucking stairs with this, but they don't show you a video of anybody going up a stairs with a fucking gun in their jeans. Pretty fucking hard now, isn't it? Why is that? Why didn't they show you that video? Think people. Think. That's enough.

"all these Internet experts are sure that it was a professional hit against Charlie Kirk." "Firstly, professionals are trained to aim for the center of scene mass." "Neither the center of scene mass or the head was hit." "The round landed here from what I saw." "The shooter got lucky." "Secondly, 200 yards is not that big a distance to make." "and there was even an exfil roof." "If you really wanna analyze these sorts of situations, team, stop looking at the shot." "Check out the planning, check out the prep, and even the exfil route." "Time will tell, I guess."

"So this Charlie Kirk story just keeps getting weirder and winter." "we're supposed to believe that some random trans shooter was on the roof" "and then you tell me that he runs roughly one mile with a long arm rifle in broad daylight to stash it in the woods." "if he left with a weapon and hid it in the woods, then why didn't he have it on him when he was leaving?" "He even had an American flag shirt on." "I can't wrap my head around that." "And now the FBI with all their resources, that's the best photo that they can give us?" "Didn't we watch criminal minds as a kid?" "The BAU to, like, rerender that image and get it pixel perfect and go, yep. That's him." "Face recognition software. Match on the nose, ears, Boom. There he is." "This is weird, guys. This is freaking weird."

On this episode of you might be a dumb motherfucker, this is my rifle. It takes two different tools to take it apart. It takes a Torx key and an Allen key. Now if I take a shot and immediately disassemble this, I have to remove the bolt, remove the magazine, grab my Allen key, hit the two bolts on the bottom, put those away in the Allen key, grab my Torx key, remove the scope, put everything in the backpack, make sure I have everything, and make my way downtown. Which is gonna take a lot longer for him than it is for me, especially because his fine tuned motor function, something as simple as grabbing an Allen key to a little bolt is gonna be extremely impaired due to a dump of adrenaline throughout his bloodstream.

"Roommate, how long have you been planning this?" "Robinson, a bit over a week, I believe." "I can get close to it, but there is a squad car parked right by it." "I think they already swept that spot, but I don't wanna chance it." "I'm worried what my old man would do if I didn't bring back grandpa's rifle." "IDEK, if it's had a serial number, but it wouldn't trace to me." "I had to leave it in a bush where I changed outfits." "Didn't have the ability or time to bring." "I might have to abandon it and hope they don't find prints." "How the f will I explain losing it to my old man?" "The feds released a photo of the rifle, and it is very unique." "I'm gonna turn myself in willingly."

"They said that he took it apart and then put it back together again." "To disassemble a rifle so that you can get it in a backpack." "Not gonna fit in a backpack." "And then somehow or another reconnects it once he gets off the roof? What? I don't I don't buy the assembly reassembly." "They said he had a screwdriver up there." "A screwdriver?" "You need more than a screwdriver. You need multiple tools. Okay? You need Allen wrenches." "It's complicated." "Let me see. What's the fastest amount of time you can do that?" "This Mauser is the same exact gun that supposedly this dude had in his grandpa had in World War one." "This guy breaks down this Mauser and here it goes." "This guy knows what the fuck he's doing." "Adrenaline throughout his bloodstream." "This story is horseshit." "You don't have a drone?"

Discusses a toy gun that "may not look like a real one, but it functions like a real one" and could be "a good educational tool to teach a child about firearm safety." It teaches to "clear a chamber, how to carefully handle one, where to point it, where not to point it." Features include: "It'll hold six rounds." "It fires the little bullet and the casing ejects." "Mag release for rapid reload." "Front and rear sights." "The slide locks back after the last round." "This little red bullet fires out of the barrel, to reload it, you just push it in." "It even has a Picatinny rail." "So you can mount your laser or your tactical light." "It's a toy that can be on the good side of the force, but it depends on how you use it." "Should this be for sale?"

"A bullet cartridge." "Right there." "It's been thrown over there, setting the scene for something that would be possibly coming our way to be part of this whole insurrection rubbish?" "Because how all in the same scene or magazine, whatever you wanna call it, gets thrown and then conveniently in the same scene, the policeman drops his weapon on the ground." "So you got the the cartridge, and you got the weapon." "Right there, ladies and gentlemen. There's the weapon, and there is the cartridge." "Right here, weapon and cartridge." "Can you see?" "Now, ladies and gentlemen, it's the finer details we need to pay attention to."

“professional hit against Charlie Kirk.” Yet: “professionals are trained to aim for the center of scene mass.” Neither the center of scene mass nor the head was hit; “The round landed here from what I saw.” The shooter got lucky; “That's not that professional.” At 200 yards, “not that big a distance to make,” and a civilian hunter with a decent rifle and scope will “bring down deer at 200 yards daily easily.” The crucial part is the prep: “serious planning and recce work” to get a long rifle into a rooftop with a perfect line of sight, plus an “exfil roof.” The shooter could move from rooftop to rooftop and exfil away from the scene, showing a level of professionalism and capability beyond what “fixated persons” usually have. Therefore: focus on planning, prep, and exfil route, not the shot. Time will tell, I guess.

Something's wrong. I know I shouldn't do this. I'm risking an awful lot to go up against this FBI, the MAGA FBI. There was no rifle in his hand. It is not easy to remove a Mauser barrel or index it after reinstalling and remain accurate. The photo of the rifle allegedly left in the woods has the barrel installed. So we're supposed to believe a guy is on the run after killing Charlie Kirk and he pauses in the woods to reinstall a barrel. I don't believe a word of it. I can't take the bullshit from this fucking government. It's lying to us. Something's wrong with this whole fucking picture. Sean Hannity immediately, that pimp scumbag goes on the air and repeats the government lie that lousy son of a bitch. I don't buy one word of this narrative, not one single word.

The speaker fixates on the claim that "the gun was disassembled. The gun was disassembled. He disassembled the gun. He reassembled the gun." A screwdriver with DNA on it is cited as the tool used to disassemble and reassemble. A Sept. 11 New York Post photo shows "the gun recovered, they say, in the Charlie Kirk assassination"—a Mauser model 98; no pins are visible, suggesting it is not easily taken apart. The idea traces to Steve Wolf, who said, "Market accessories that would allow you to break this gun down," describing a bolt action with "very few moving pieces" and that it is "preferred for long range shots." He notes a cartridge found inside the gun with others in a magazine and guesses it could be broken down "in a second or two." Mike from Guns N Gear: "there is no such thing as a takedown kit on this."

Speaker expresses panic and intent to text his leftist trans lover with every detail of what he did, claiming he’d planned for a week. "Engrave the bullets." He narrates: "Disassemble the rifle. Reassemble the rifle. Disassemble the rifle. Disassemble the rifle. Reassemble the rifle without a screwdriver while running." He says, "Put it in the woods. Covered it in a towel. I did this for you, and send." He ends with: "Alright. It's a good thing that I, Tyler Robinson, someone who has a four point o GPA and a 34 on the ACT, is smart enough to know that there is no way that the FBI could ever get ahold of my text messages."

Speaker questions the narrative: 'random trans shooter' on the roof who 'took this shot' and was 'undetected' because the FBI released video footage. He asks if this means 'he must have already had planted the gun on the roof prior' and wonders 'why didn't he have it on him when he was leaving?' He questions the lack of footage—'why don't we have any images of this kid leaving the school?' and 'video footage of this kid jumping off the roof?' He says, 'he runs roughly one mile with a long arm rifle in broad daylight to stash it in the woods' and argues, 'you definitely wouldn't carry the rifle with you' to blend in, citing 'an American flag shirt on.' He references 'criminal minds' and BAU, concluding, 'This is weird, guys. This is freaking weird.'

The speaker references Rob O’Neill and “the other dozens of high level firearms experts” who have created content on this topic, stating that all of them have done range testing, including the speaker who personally tested with 30-06 rounds. He describes conducting a ballistics test using a variety of targets: sheep bone, cow vertebrae, cow femurs, cow femurs wrapped in 10 inches of meat, and even literal half-inch steel. He notes that ten other creators have also performed tests, and asserts that in 100% of the ballistics testing done so far, the 30-06 has blown straight through everything tested. He asks listeners to consider a specific question: why is there no video from Matt Tardio recreating the FBI narrative shot, and why doesn’t that video exist? He challenges others to take their gun to the range and replicate the test, insisting that they can obtain a 100% realistic ballistic human anatomy head set at 139 yards with a nine-degree slope and a nine-degree offset to replicate the shot, and to show the results. The speaker then recounts his own testing process and results. He says he took his time at the range with his guns to see if he could produce results that would match the narrative he’s questioning, and he says his testing showed certain outcomes. He then cites specific demonstrations from his range work: first, the cow neck vertebrae “ exploded.” He then mentions cow femurs, describing them as gigantic and “a 100 times stronger than a human neck,” explaining why the discussion is focusing on the neck region. He continues with another example and states, “That’s why we’re hitting next.” He attempts to review the results again, saying, “Maybe I didn’t. Here we go. I’m going back.” He concludes with an observation: “Oh, look. It exploded. Went right through. Maybe I did, miss.”

Speaker 0 argues the Charlie Kirk story keeps getting weirder. They claim a random trans shooter was on the roof, took this shot, runs across into the rooftop, jumps down, somehow undetected because the FBI releases a video footage. Was this when he was walking into the building, then he must have already had planted the gun on the roof prior, and he somehow managed to walk back in the second time without the weapon. If he left with a weapon and hid it in the woods, why didn't he have it on him when he was leaving? They say he runs roughly one mile with a long arm rifle in broad daylight to stash it in the woods. If you were running, you wouldn't carry the rifle with you. He wore an American flag shirt. The FBI with all their resources, that's the best photo? Didn’t we watch Criminal Minds? They claim BAU would rerender that image and get it pixel perfect. Face recognition software could redigitalize that kid's face with AI to pixel perfect; this is weird.

"What you're watching here, you're gonna watch the reaction." "Something is hitting that shirt before it goes through his neck." "There could easily be a white vest under it." "Or what I just realized here is you guys have black letters on there." "That round could have very possibly touched one of those black letters." "The shirt looks like after the fact, but he did even have this mic on here." "There is no way to get that angle of that shot." "the vest goes through this, hits something inside, ricochets back out, comes out the top." "it most likely was a long rifle." "I'm still not convinced of the trans shooter." "There have been lies that the FBI has told us." "Kyle's Kyle does this stuff for a living." "Drop some comments below."

Questions the claim that 'some random trans shooter was on the roof, took this shot, runs across into the rooftop, jumps down, somehow magically being undetected because the FBI releases a a video footage.' He asks if he had 'planted the gun on the roof prior' and how he could 'walk back in the second time without the weapon.' He questions why 'we don't have any images of this kid leaving the school' or 'any video footage of this kid jumping off the roof,' and notes he 'runs roughly one mile with a long arm rifle in broad daylight to stash it in the woods' while wearing 'an American flag shirt.' He doubts the FBI photo is the best they can provide and references 'criminal minds' and 'the BAU' that would 'rerender that image' to be 'pixel perfect' with 'face recognition software.' Contrasts movie-like tech with reality, calling it 'weird.'

From the outset, one of the speakers says there was a sense that the official narrative about the day didn’t add up, expressing that many Americans feel they were being lied to. The major problem they identify with the assassination narrative includes inconsistencies and unanswered questions rather than acceptance of the official story. Speaker 1 recalls being told Charlie Kirk was shot and initially in critical condition, but notes that the video shows an exit wound and movement of Kirk’s shirt that suggests an impact nearby. With extensive experience around gunshot wounds, they say what they saw didn’t make sense. They reference the FBI’s announcement of a shooter and describe a separate incident involving a person on the roof who allegedly disassembled and reassembled a firearm, aligned a scope, fired a cold bore shot, moved to the roof, and then wrapped the rifle up. They mention texts from the shooter that didn’t sound like a typical 22-year-old and state that these observations raise questions. They say asking questions leads to being torn down or accused of holding conspiracy views, and they specify they aren’t claiming “Israel did it,” but insisting the questions about the event “don’t look good.” They raise specific questions: did the security team remove Charlie Kirk’s lapel mic after the incident and give it to someone else; what happened to the SIM card; did someone take the camera behind him; why was the crime scene contaminated and rebuilt. They admit they don’t know what is true but insist the questions deserve answers. They note that once they question, they’re labeled antisemitic, and they say they didn’t even bring up Israel. They emphasize the personal and national significance of the incident. Speaker 0 mentions a claim that Charlie Kirk was portrayed as Superman, with his body supposedly stopping the 30-odd-six bullet, and asks what would have happened if a 30-06 round hit him. Speaker 1 says it would likely blow his head off and leave remnants of the bullet, arguing that they don’t think such remnants have been found yet. They question why the chair and desk were moved and contend that a forensic expert could determine the shot’s origin, insisting they are simply asking questions. If those questions can be refuted, they would stop asking; but they claim they’re not getting any answers beyond “this is what happened” and being told to “shut up.” Speaker 0 adds that telling someone to be quiet amounts to labeling them antisemitic, and that when the trial comes, they will look like a fool. Speaker 1 says that’s a tactic of the left—when you call them out, they label you a name—and that the right is now doing the same to them.

The speaker argues it's not clear the shooter fled the scene with a weapon, possibly downplaying it as a concealed firearm. He suggests the shooter could have had a short-barreled AR-15 broken down to fit a bag, raising questions about how the gun ended up and was later found in the woods. If the shooter didn’t leave with a weapon, one possibility is the weapon was left at the scene; another is that the person wasn’t the shooter. The speaker acknowledges conspiracy theories and distinguishes personal uncertainty from certainty, referencing the FBI’s account of sneaking a 30-06 rifle in his pants, taking the shot, not leaving with it, and then retrieving it hours later. He wonders why someone would run into the woods and asks where the actual gun is, and whether a different rifle in the woods was misattributed.

"So we're supposed to believe that some random trans shooter was on the roof, took this shot, runs across into the rooftop, jumps down, somehow magically being undetected because the FBI releases a a video footage." "Was this when he was walking into the building, the then he must have already had planted the gun on the roof prior, and he somehow managed to walk back in the second time without the weapon." "And then because if he left with a weapon and hid it in the woods, then why didn't he have it on him when he was leaving?" "Didn't we watch criminal minds as a kid? Like, they have this super advanced software where they upload the image, and then the FBI just does their like, where's the BAU at and shit?" "Face recognition software. Match on the nose, ears, Boom. There he is."