TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In September, headlines falsely labeled me a sex criminal. This wasn't isolated; it was the culmination of a multi-year campaign to silence my dissenting views on geopolitical issues like the war in Ukraine. Governments and intelligence agencies, including those of the US and UK, were involved. My critiques, though not pro-Russia, challenged Western narratives and my ability to persuade a broad audience was perceived as a threat. Organizations like Coda Story, linked to the UK government and CIA, and others funded by Moderna, tracked and suppressed my content. This censorship extended to social media, orchestrated by my own government, without trial or named accusers. The attempt to discredit independent media is a broader effort to control information and suppress dissent, effectively creating a one-party system. This experience, though personally painful, especially during my son's heart surgery, has only solidified my commitment to truth-telling and challenging authoritarianism. The fight for free speech is ongoing and I believe a global awakening is on the horizon.

The speaker serves on the armed services committee, overseeing cyber efforts and receiving quarterly classified briefings. After a recent briefing from the intelligence committee and Department of Defense, the speaker believes that the listeners and Tim Pool were victims of a Russian malign influence campaign. The speaker emphasizes that they were not involved or solicitous, but rather the victims. The speaker feels obligated to share this perception, based on access to intelligence and evidence, because the listeners and Tim Pool have been unfairly smeared. The speaker believes it's clear they were victims of Russian election interference, and that's how it should be portrayed.

In September, media outlets falsely labeled me a sex criminal without naming accusers. This was the culmination of a years-long campaign to silence my dissenting views on major geopolitical issues like the war in Ukraine. My critiques, while not pro-Russia, questioned Western involvement. This led to accusations of being a Chinese propagandist by a US government-linked organization. Subsequently, the UK government, connected to the CIA, pressured social media to censor and demonetize me. This coordinated attack, involving organizations funded by Big Pharma and government, reveals the suppression of independent media and dissenting voices. The open contest of ideas is a sham, with governments actively working to silence opposition, even using taxpayer money against their own citizens. My experience exposes the fragility of free speech and the lengths to which powerful entities will go to maintain control. The fight continues, and the stakes are high.

Thank you for inviting me to speak. I’m Lauren Southern, a filmmaker and YouTuber. Recently, Tenet Media, a company I worked with, was indicted for alleged ties to Russian funding. I want to clarify that I had no knowledge of these allegations and maintained full creative control over my content. Claims that Tenet Media has significant influence are exaggerated. They had about 300,000 YouTube subscribers, not the 16 million cited. The alleged views and impressions are also inflated. If Russia aimed to influence Western media, they failed. As the only Canadian commentator discussing Canadian issues, I can assure you that any influence from alleged Russian funding was minimal. Many Canadians hold views based on their own experiences and concerns, not foreign disinformation. It's crucial to recognize that these opinions reflect a growing sentiment among Canadians. Thank you.

In this video, a member of parliament raises concerns about outside interference in democracy. They mention Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum (WEF), claiming that the WEF has infiltrated governments worldwide, including Canada's cabinet. The member asks for transparency regarding which cabinet ministers support the WEF's agenda. However, due to poor audio and video quality, the member's question is not fully understood. Another member accuses them of promoting disinformation. Speaker 1 then proudly mentions young leaders like Prime Minister Trudeau and President of Argentina, suggesting that they have influence over cabinet members. The video ends without further elaboration.

Odessa Orlewitz hosts Liberty Talk Canada and introduces Doctor Dimitri, a senior data scientist with the Government of Canada (employee of CBSA). Dimitri says he is coming forward publicly with his full story as his case becomes public in two weeks. He states he did not disclose his medical status or discuss private correspondences, but he began sharing data-driven insights from within the system, building a portfolio of resources over the last five years. He says he has included his discipline letter and investigation report, which detail violations and allegations he defended against for talking about data he analyzed. Dimitri describes a key, simple piece of evidence: deaths following COVID by vaccination status, published by the Public Health Agency of Canada. He argues that vaccine efficacy appears not to show significant improvement and that a technique he calls “algorithmic bias” or data skewing is used to hide the inconvenient truth. He says the data show that what researchers want to know—deaths among unvaccinated versus vaccinated—cannot be accurately inferred when data before vaccination campaigns are counted in, thus diluting comparisons. He frames this as a political interference issue, not a new phenomenon, comparing it to past concerns raised by Shiv Chopra and continuing into 2021. Dimitri emphasizes fear of reprisal in the public service. He notes that, in public-service surveys, fear of reprisal is highest in the Health Products regulation unit, which he says he uncovered, and claims colleagues would testify but fear losing their jobs. He explains that his own union activities and leadership seminars since 2019 involved teaching data visualization tools (including PSESS) to observe datasets and detect issues. He recounts that after pushing data on vaccination and COVID, he faced multiple disciplinary actions: five days of suspension without pay for discussing information conflicting with government messaging; an eight-day suspension; and a ten-day suspension, all connected to the hearing and his broader aim of alerting on red flags. Dimitri states that the hearing concerns limits to the duty of loyalty and insubordination in a democratic country like Canada. He argues that data people should be allowed to publish information that could challenge official messaging. He also notes that, outside Canada, Alberta passed a Regulated Professions Act and a Neutrality Act to protect free speech across regulated professions, suggesting a national parallel is needed for public servants. He says he will post updates in a newsletter and provide links to evidence and to testimonials from colleagues, professors from Ottawa U, and other data scientists who assisted with analyses, including Pfizer papers. Dimitri recounts personal context: he took his own vaccine dose and has presented his case publicly, including short videos from a journalist documentary and his Freedom Convoy presentation. He asserts that mainstream media, such as CBC, did not interview him during the convoy era, implying a cover-up by mainstream outlets. Odessa urges viewers to attend Dimitri’s hearing, visit his website, and share the information widely. She closes with promotional plugs and advises the audience to follow the case through ivim.ca and related links. Throughout, Dimitri stresses the overarching themes of political interference in data, fear of reprisal within the public service, and the need for transparency and accountability in health data and governance. He frames the hearing as a pivotal moment for trust in Canadian public institutions and urges support for whistleblowers like himself.

The speaker raises concerns about outside interference in democracy, specifically mentioning Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum (WEF). They question which cabinet ministers in Canada support the WEF's agenda. The speaker's audio and video quality are poor, leading to interruptions and apologies from the speaker. Another member accuses the previous speaker of promoting disinformation, and the debate continues.

Hey guys, my name is Olesia and I'm a former employee of the so called Troll Fabric in Kyiv, Ukraine. Today I want to tell you something about this structure and some reasons why I have left this job. I may be wrong but I think it's the first time somebody published insider materials on this topic since 2019 when a journalist infiltrated the office in Kyiv to make a report about it. And back then I did realize that it was a troll fabric. But, you know, I told myself it's okay because I always supported President Zelenskyy and I still do. At first the job was focused on supporting President Zelenskyy online, like writing positive comments or posts, etc. So, we were mostly working on Facebook and Instagram. As time passed, I was transferred from the Ukrainian department, which worked for Ukrainian audience, to the English speaking department, which were focused on the English speaking public, like Americans and Europeans. But the doubts remain the same. Support for president Zelenskyy, support for Ukraine and Ukrainian Warfork. We also had French, German, and Italian departments. I heard some other officers in were hiring people who spoke Finnish and also Swedish and Estonian. About a half year ago our main chef in command, Andrei Borisovich Jermak, paid us a visit. I'm pretty sure you have heard of the head of President Zelensky office. Really it was an unusual event for the main figure behind our project to come visit the office. So he came with some English speaking officials who were introduced to us as the American partners. We were told that they were very important guests but no further details. Some of my colleagues told me that they were CIA. During the visit, they said that our field of work is expanding and we were told that our new target was The United States Of America, especially the upcoming elections. Long story short, we were asked to do everything to prevent Donald Trump from winning the elections. So basically, this topic added to our main lines of work. Since then, each of us had to post at least three or five posts daily, posing as Americans and Europeans, criticizing Donald Trump and praising Biden. The Americans have even organized a few lectures for us to get a better understanding of American politics and American mindset and main social and politics issues. Then we were occupied with the topics for the job which sounded like this. Unlike Trump, Biden is a smart and experienced politician. Unlike Trump, Biden will never betray NATO partners. Trump will alienate our partners. Also, Biden will not abandon Ukraine, and Biden will protect democracy while Trump is Putin's puppet. I honestly tried to convince myself it's okay since Biden is a clear option for Ukraine. But, you know, it was too much for me. Some of my colleagues felt really nervous too. One thing is to work for the best interest of my country, but interfering in US politics is a whole other thing.

The speaker discusses a document revealing foreign interference in the 2019 Canadian federal election involving Chinese individuals, community leaders, and politicians. They mention CSIS briefings on PRC interference in the elections, implicating candidates and staff. The panel received briefings on PRC's pragmatic interference tactics. The speaker confirms CSIS briefings to the panel but struggles to recall specific details. The language used in the briefings aligns with public summaries on PRC's activities.

The speaker questions outside interference in democracy, referencing Klaus Schwab's claim of infiltrating governments. They ask for transparency regarding Canadian cabinet ministers involved with the World Economic Forum. Another member interrupts due to poor audio and video quality. The discussion shifts to disinformation and the need to address it. Translation: The speaker raises concerns about outside influence in democracy and asks for transparency about Canadian cabinet ministers involved with the World Economic Forum. Another member interrupts due to technical issues and the conversation shifts to disinformation.

In this video, a member of parliament raises concerns about outside interference in democracy. They mention Klaus Schwab, the head of the World Economic Forum, who allegedly claimed that his organization has infiltrated governments, including Canada's cabinet. The member asks for transparency regarding which cabinet ministers support the WEF's agenda. However, the audio and video quality are poor, leading to interruptions and apologies from the speaker. Another member accuses the first member of promoting disinformation. Then, a third member thanks a colleague for their speech and intends to ask a specific question related to the legislation being discussed.

RT is funding right-leaning bloggers and YouTube personalities, including Jordan Peterson and Tucker Carlson. The purpose is to amplify messages that destabilize democracies.

It's crucial to ensure that shared content isn't exploited by foreign entities to undermine Canadian democracy. I maintain full creative control over everything I publish through my media contracts. Concerns have been raised about online content unintentionally aiding foreign propaganda, particularly regarding recent immigration policy critiques. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced a pause on immigration, which I have long argued for. It's interesting to see this portrayed as Russian disinformation. I believe Trudeau's decision is correct, and I hope this committee doesn't dismiss valid concerns simply because they align with opinions from individuals with foreign-sounding names.

In January 2022, a colleague alerted Speaker 0 that there had been a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year, which sparked curiosity. Speaker 1 states that “Their own government told us a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies.” Speaker 2 says she has “lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuinely for the best interests of Canadians.” Speaker 3 alleges that doctors “made extra money to push vaccines” and were given a billing code to do it, and that she has “pulled all the billing codes.” Speaker 4 asserts that “They've purchased the vaccine that hasn't been approved,” distributed it to the provinces so that once it’s approved, they can “start jabbing ourselves with it” and “start jabbing pregnant mothers with it.” Speaker 3 questions the necessity of vaccinations: “Why did we have to get these vaccinations? Like, why was this something that we had to do? You go to the hospital, you expect to have a baby, and you expect to go home, and then you don't.” Speaker 0 speculates on criminal negligence, saying, “I would suspect that there was criminal negligence on part of the government and the public health officials.” Speaker 3 notes that it is “highly recommended that pregnant women get their vaccine as soon as possible.” Speaker 0 contends that a narrative was pushed to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2 claims wiretapping, harassment, charging, and barring expert witnesses: “They had wiretapped her phone. They had harassed her. They had charged her. They didn't allow any expert witnesses to testify.” Speaker 1 accuses police of trying to cover up Canadian babies’ deaths “to the point of stopping detective Helen Greaves from testifying about it.” Speaker 4 observes that “The dominant individuals keep the subordinates in their place by constant aggression.” Speaker 5 discusses vaccination choice versus public risk, remarking, “If you don't wanna get vaccinated, that's your choice. But don't think you can get on a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk,” and claims CBC initially “started off with CBC running a story to implicate her and to paint her with a brush that looks uncomplimentary to the public.” Speaker 6 claims Canada must shift its understanding of what the is, describing it as “a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada.” Speaker 4 calls this “the most significant matter affecting our children today from a health perspective,” noting that authorities are “not investigating.” Speaker 2 concludes that everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, and health agencies, “how they work together, how they censored information. It all ties together to this one case, and that's what makes it so dangerous.”

Speaker 0: Hello Mr. Trudeau, Alexandre from Rebel News. I want to quickly address what happened yesterday. You demonized one of the few media outlets that doesn't receive government funding. You expressed your opinion that we spread misinformation. If that were true, the Supreme Court wouldn't have allowed us to be here today. Will you kindly answer my question as the Prime Minister, or will you continue to demonize my profession? I shared my perspective on your organization last night, and I have nothing more to say. It makes one wonder who you really are. Thank you.

The speaker, Ryan Davidson, is being questioned by an Integrated National Security Enforcement Team about his online posts regarding Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Davidson claims he is seeking a lawful remedy for what he perceives as a criminal conspiracy with the Communist Party of China. He expresses concerns about the well-being of citizens and offers to contribute to investigations. Davidson criticizes Trudeau's government and accuses him of being propped up by a terrorist. He calls for an independent civilian to oversee the RCMP investigation. The security team warns Davidson about making inflammatory statements and confirms that they have no interest in stifling his speech. Davidson insists on continuing to voice his opinions until the issues are resolved.

The speaker recounts a long-standing pattern of interactions with federal agents, noting that jokes about agents reading their chats stopped being funny for a period. They describe being pressured to work for these agencies for months, a pressure that left no paper trail and was deliberately concealed. Each time agents visited their home, they were asked to shut off their phone and told not to tell anyone about what was happening. The speaker explains that the only reason they can discuss the situation now is that they made a deliberate, fear-driven decision to do so. They recall sweating and nearly vomiting, and they went so far as to clip a DJI microphone to their bra before every visit, anxious that the device would beep or reveal what was being discussed. This precaution reflects the level of fear and the stakes involved in the interactions. They claim to have later confronted Parliament about the surveillance and pressure campaigns they faced, actions taken after they recorded evidence of these activities. The speaker asserts a broader possibility: there exists a very real world in which they did none of that—where they would still be online today as an independent influencer while privately secretly acting on behalf of Canadian intelligence agencies—because they were made to believe they would go to jail. They emphasize that they are not the only person affected by this dynamic, suggesting a wider pattern or network behind these experiences.

The speaker claims that not only the current government, but all previous governments have ignored their warnings about interference. They believe it took so long for this information to come out because of partisan politics and the influence of Chinese intelligence agents. According to the speaker, every prime minister and government office has been compromised, posing a significant security risk for Canadians. They suggest the need for an independent investigation and the implementation of laws similar to Australia's 2017 law against foreign interference to protect the country's future.

A journalist confronts Chrystia Freeland, Canada's Minister of Foreign Affairs, about the government's support for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRDC). The journalist is then arrested by the police for allegedly assaulting someone. The journalist protests his innocence and requests the microphone to record the incident. He criticizes the government for suppressing freedom of speech and accuses them of prioritizing political correctness over addressing the IRDC's alleged terrorist activities. The journalist expresses frustration with the arrest and claims that Canada is becoming a totalitarian state. The video ends with the police providing a brief statement assuring everyone's safety.

Putin was unhappy with Speaker 1 for raising concerns about the unfairness of Russia's 2011 parliamentary elections. Putin is paranoid about mass movements near Russia that could lead to democracy, closer ties with the EU, or NATO membership. The speaker believes Russia is still interfering with U.S. democracy by influencing opinions and election systems. She believes she was an obstacle to Russia's plans to undermine U.S. democracy and impose authoritarian control, and that Russia wanted to remove her to achieve other goals. Russia is still stirring up trouble and influencing people on social media, including efforts to undermine the Affordable Care Act to cause political disruption. Electing a president was only part of Russia's plan. Putin aims to undermine democracies using money, blackmail, and inducements to bend political and business leaders to his will. The speaker doesn't know if Trump is a witting or unwitting tool of Putin, but believes Putin is playing a long game to undermine democracies.

In September, media outlets falsely labeled me a sex criminal without naming accusers. This was the culmination of a multi-year campaign to silence my dissenting views on geopolitical issues like the war in Ukraine. Governments and intelligence agencies, including the US and UK, orchestrated attacks, falsely labeling me a Chinese propagandist and coordinating censorship efforts through organizations like Coda Story, which has ties to the CIA. My critiques, informed by academic sources, presented alternative perspectives on mainstream narratives, exposing the homogenized views of powerful institutions. This coordinated attack, which even involved Moderna tracking my content, reveals the lengths to which powerful interests go to suppress dissent. The accusations were made anonymously, and my own government contacted online providers to demonetize and censor me. This shows that independent media is a threat to those in power, and the open contest of ideas is a sham. The ongoing attacks are terrifying but also reveal the struggle for control over information.

In this video, the speaker addresses the issue of misinformation and disinformation during the pandemic. They mention a person called Timothy Caulfield who blocked them. The speaker discusses a study by StatCan that found 96% of Canadians recognize misinformation, with over 90% getting their information online. They show the questionnaire used in the study and highlight the question about misleading COVID-19 information. The speaker questions Timothy's credibility, mentioning his connection to the Trudeau Foundation and receiving a grant to combat misinformation. They express concern about the influence of money and special interests in government statistics. The speaker concludes by sharing that Timothy blocked them despite presenting raw data.

The speaker explains that they were determined to do the interview with Vladimir Putin because they were prevented from doing so by their own government. They express shock and anger at the US government's spying and interference. The speaker clarifies that their views are constantly evolving based on evidence and that their main view is to tell the truth. They deny being pro-Trump or anti-Biden and state that their goal was to gather information about Putin and the current state of affairs. They also discuss the state of media bias and the importance of free speech.