reSee.it - Related Video Feed

This complex diagram highlights the presence of HIV in the spike protein, as identified by Luc Montagnier, a leading virologist and Nobel Prize winner for discovering HIV. Montagnier's research indicates that 18 RNA fragments in the spike protein match those of HIV and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV). Notably, information about his former academic position has been removed from the internet, similar to the erasure of details regarding Zhang Li's work. Montagnier's findings emphasize the connection between HIV and the spike protein, reinforcing his authority on the subject.

This video discusses the history of coronavirus research, highlighting its origins in 1965 and the development of spike protein vaccines by Pfizer in 1990. The speaker emphasizes the long-standing manipulation of pathogens for various purposes and questions the ethical implications of these actions. The conversation urges listeners to consider the implications of such research on humanity's future.

Scientists are investigating claims that COVID-19 was manipulated in a lab after a tiny DNA fragment matching a sequence patented by Moderna was found in the virus. The possibility of an accidental lab escape is being considered, as human error is always a factor. The Wuhan lab in China may have been conducting research on virus enhancement or gene modification, leading to an infection that spread to others. The scientists are currently analyzing the data to determine the validity of these claims. It will take time to thoroughly examine the genetic evidence.

Speaker 0 asks Dr. Fleming if he is prepared to testify that COVID-19 is a bioweapon, to which he responds affirmatively. Dr. Fleming's qualifications are briefly discussed, including his medical and law degrees, as well as his experience as an inventor and author. He is asked if he has the ability to read and interpret medical patents, to which he confirms. Dr. Fleming wrote a book exploring the possibility of COVID-19 being a bioweapon, providing evidence of gain-of-function research and funding sources. He also discusses genetic modifications made to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, including the PRRA insert and HIV insert, which are not naturally occurring. The research of Shi Zhengli and others is mentioned, highlighting their efforts to increase the virus's infectivity.

This video discusses research by virologist Luc Montagnier showing HIV RNA fragments in the spike protein. Montagnier, known for identifying HIV, found 18 RNA fragments matching HIV and SIV in the spike protein. The presence of these fragments raises questions about the origins of the virus. The video highlights the complexity of the situation and the need for further investigation.

COVID, Ebola, and AIDS have all been blamed on lab experiments involving Anthony Fauci. The speaker questions the origins of these viruses and highlights the role of a particular author in proving their natural origins. They discuss the controversial history of HIV and AIDS, including the use of chimpanzees and the development of vaccines. The speaker raises concerns about the manipulation of data and the potential cover-up of information. They call for transparency, research, and open discussion to uncover the truth.

Dr. Kary Mullis, the Nobel Prize winner for inventing the PCR test, explains that the test was not designed to detect viruses. The PCR test can find almost anything in anyone if done properly, but it doesn't necessarily mean it's meaningful. The official protocol for COVID-19 PCR testing has led to false positives, labeling asymptomatic individuals as infected. Mullis discovered that there was no proof of HIV causing AIDS when he was hired to measure HIV levels using PCR. He realized that no one had evidence to support the claim. Mullis also exposed how the CDC and high-level officials profited from the HIV/AIDS connection. Despite his willingness to challenge them, few people were interested in exposing the truth. Mullis passed away in 2019, just before the emergence of COVID-19.

Professor Luc Montagnier, Nobel Prize winner in Medicine and co-discoverer of HIV, discusses his current work on the virus. He mentions that he is not conducting experiments in the lab but rather working on a computer with a colleague. They have concluded that there has been manipulation of the virus, specifically the addition of sequences from the HIV virus. However, Montagnier does not know who is responsible for this manipulation or the purpose behind it. He emphasizes that his role is to present the facts and not accuse anyone.

The transcript argues that deflating the parasitic system is necessary because oversized states and corporations cause decay, corruption, and injustice, harming the people, workers, creators, and those harmed by elite interests. It cites examples such as Tanks for Kidney’s RT Documentary, Organ Harvesting, Black Market Transplants, and Crimes Against Humanity. It presents a quantified claim: extrapolating estimates for 2022 to 2023 plus half of 2024 yields total excess deaths of thirty-six million since the Covid Vax rollout, and adding nine million from Covid “killing protocols” in 2020 brings the total to forty-five million for four and a half years of Covid killing protocols. It describes SARS-CoV-2, the virus and vaccine bioweapons, as part of a narrative that depopulation and genocide are not taboo due to mass propaganda, corrupted science, lack of truthful science, and censorship in mainstream media and on tech platforms. It asserts that elites and many people still think SARS-CoV-2 is naturally evolved, but truthful science allegedly proves beyond doubt that SARS-CoV-2 was designed and made by humans in a bio lab. The transcript claims the genetic code of SARS-CoV-2 contains several lab-made inserts, such as PRRA and HIVGP120, which are described as too large and too numerous and only appearing in other natural viruses that are genetically very different from SARS-CoV-2, making natural mutation or recombination quasi zero. It also references a substantial trail of documents and testimonies years before and after the release of SARS-CoV-2 about these genetic codes, the existing biochemical technology to insert them, financing of the research, scientific documents, and patents. It then asserts that GenTech Covid vaccines cause human cells to produce, for months up to years, huge amounts of the toxic spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 in all organs and tissues, much greater than the mucosal infection from the virus itself in healthy unvaccinated people, which supposedly causes mild illness. The claim continues that these GenTech Covid vaccines are, in fact, bioweapons and much worse than the virus itself. It adds that not only the produced toxic spike protein but also other components and contaminations of these vaccines cause serious health damage. The source cited for these claims is Source2mia.org, with a request to like and follow.

The speaker suggests that there may be a lack of integrity among physicians and scientific researchers investigating the origins of AIDS. They argue that it is not in their interest to always tell the truth and that there are instances where they have lied. They claim that there are many others who believe the virus may have come from a laboratory. The spread of AIDS in countries like Brazil and Haiti is attributed to factors such as the smallpox vaccination campaign in Africa and the hepatitis B vaccine program in America. The speaker emphasizes the urgency of finding a solution to control the virus, as it has the potential to exterminate mankind. The discussion also touches on a biological warfare attack in San Francisco.

Professor Luc Montagnier, Nobel Prize winner in Medicine and co-discoverer of HIV, discusses his current work on the virus. He clarifies that he is not working in the lab but rather analyzing data with a colleague. Through their analysis, they have concluded that there was manipulation involved in the virus, specifically the addition of sequences from the HIV virus. However, Montagnier does not know who was responsible for this manipulation or the purpose behind it. He emphasizes that his role is to present the facts and not accuse anyone.

In the conversation, Speaker 0 discusses conclusions about a potential manipulation of the SARS-like virus. He states that there is a model based on the classic virus, but with modifications: the model is mainly derived from a bat coronavirus, to which sequences from HIV have been added. He clarifies that he does not know who added these HIV sequences, and he emphasizes that it is not natural, describing the work as done by a professional molecular biologist, a precise and meticulous process akin to an horologist working at the level of genetic sequences. Speaker 0 further explains that the purpose of such modifications is not clear to him. His goal is to present the facts without accusing anyone or identifying who did it or why. He posits a possibility that the aim could have been to develop a vaccine against AIDS, suggesting that small HIV sequences were inserted into the larger coronavirus sequence. He elaborates that in this virus, HIV genetic material is present as a long RNA strand, and at a certain position, small HIV sequences have been fixed into it. He stresses that these small sequences are meaningful, not trivial, because they could modify, for example, antigenic sites, thereby altering the protein exposed to a vaccine through a small sequence derived from another virus. Speaker 1 interjects, noting that there has been talk of a human origin for the virus, which has been refuted by most scientific authorities. Speaker 1 highlights that despite such refutations, there is still a perceived attempt to silence the research. He mentions that another group of highly regarded Indian researchers published something similar and were forced to retract their work. Overall, the dialogue centers on the possibility of engineered modifications to a coronavirus by inserting HIV sequences into its genome, the potential purpose behind such modifications (including the idea of vaccine development against AIDS), and the broader discussion about alleged suppression or censorship of related research, alongside mentions of scientific authorities denying a human-origin claim and the retraction of parallel work by Indian researchers.

Professor Luc Montagnier, Nobel Prize winner in medicine and discoverer of HIV, discusses his current work on the virus. He explains that he is not working in the lab but rather on a computer with a colleague, analyzing the measures taken in laboratories on patients. He concludes that there has been manipulation of the virus, with sequences from HIV added to the original bat virus model. However, he does not know who is responsible or the purpose behind it. Montagnier emphasizes that he is only presenting the facts and not accusing anyone.

This complex diagram highlights the presence of HIV in the spike protein, as identified by Luc Montagnier, a renowned virologist and Nobel Prize winner for discovering HIV. Montagnier found 18 RNA fragments that match HIV and Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV). Notably, the PRRA sequence consists of four amino acids, requiring 12 nucleotides, indicating an insert rather than a mutation, which typically occurs one nucleotide at a time. Additionally, an HIV insert of 590 amino acids corresponds to 1,770 nucleotide bases that match HIV-1. This raises questions about the nature of these changes, as they cannot be explained as simple mutations. The evidence presented underscores significant findings related to HIV's presence in the spike protein.

Professor Montagnier contradicts his opponents' arguments about the dormant state of the virus before the onset of AIDS. Two articles in the scientific journal Nature suggest that the virus never sleeps. From the beginning of the infection, HIV and the immune system engage in a fierce battle that lasts for years, ultimately resulting in the virus's victory. As a result, John Madox, the editor-in-chief of the journal, asks those like Dulseberg or Mulith who have always denied the HIV hypothesis as the cause of AIDS to finally admit their mistake. Despite the Nature publications, Mulice remains steadfast in his position, believing that these works do not provide clarity on the virus's role in immune system destruction. However, Mulice's opinion is not shared by everyone.

Dr. Kary Mullis won the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR test, which can find almost anything in the body if amplified. The PCR test for COVID-19 has led to false positives due to high amplification levels. Mullis discovered there was no proof linking HIV to AIDS, exposing a sham in the medical community. He criticized the CDC for profit-driven motives and called out Anthony Fauci and Robert Gallo. Despite his efforts to expose the truth, Mullis passed away in 2019, leaving many questions unanswered.

COVID world 10/09/2022 reports estimated extra deaths of 31 million and estimated serious adverse effects of 1.9 billion for three years of SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons. The two main differences with the previous estimates on 10/01/2022 are: First, 11 countries, for about 600,000,000 people, were added to the estimate base data. As such, the current estimate base data consists of 47 countries for about 2,300,000,000 people, making the current estimates more representative for the whole world. Second, for estimating the serious adverse effects the extra deaths of 2021 and 2022 are taken fully into account as input instead of half in the previous estimates. The extra deaths estimates for 2020, 2021, and 2022 are based on officially reported and factual deaths in the countries mentioned in the table below. For the source of all the used data see the Our World and Data links in the appendix. Extra deaths (see columns twenty twenty ED, twenty twenty one ED, and twenty twenty two ED in the table below) are calculated as the difference of the factual number of total deaths in the concerned year. The missing months of the incomplete 2022 year are estimated by extrapolation of the monthly average of all known months from January 2021 on. The for yearly evolution corrected average of the five preceding years 2015 to 2019. The yearly correction factor used is 0.75% and was calculated based on the evolution of the sum of deaths of all countries below in 2015 to 2019. For the 2020 ED estimate the correction factor 0.75 was three times (reference year twenty seventeen) applied on the five year average, for 2021 ED four times and for 2022 ED five times. In other words, the extra deaths estimates are in fact the excess deaths after correction for an expected yearly evolution and expected yearly without the mass vaccination and COVID bioweapons. Then to calculate the 2020 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED100 ks extra deaths per 100 ks people of the country is calculated. Then this column is aggregated which results in 112 extra deaths per 100 ks people. The latter value is applied on the world population which results into nine million extra deaths in 2020, the first year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. To calculate the 2021 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED21M doses, extra deaths per million doses given in the country, is calculated. This column is aggregated which results in nine sixty one extra deaths per million doses. The latter value is applied on the world doses which results into twelve point one million extra deaths in 2021, the first year with the vaccine bioweapon and second year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. To calculate the 2022 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED22M doses, extra deaths per million doses given in the country, is calculated. This column is aggregated which results in seven sixty three extra deaths per million doses. The latter value is applied on the world doses which results into nine point six million extra deaths in 2022, the second year with the vaccine bioweapon and third year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. Press CTRL plus four more image detail below. The estimate for people with serious adverse effects is calculated by multiplying the estimated extra deaths in 2021 and 2022 by an estimated ratio reported adverse effects/reported deaths after COVID vaccination. The ratio used is 87.6 and was calculated from the table Estimated probabilities after COVID vaccination for all ages in the article below. This results in an estimated one point one billion serious adverse effects for 2021 and zero point eight billion for 2022. Considering the estimated thirty one million extra deaths and estimated one point nine billion serious adverse effects for three years of deployed SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons the words bioweaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo. Furthermore, there are about ten million extra deaths yearly worldwide since 2020. If these extra deaths are continued this will result in one hundred and ten million extra deaths by the end of 2030 from these bioweapons since 2020. For the sake of estimating, certain assumptions about the domain were introduced. If one or some of those assumptions would be far off target, for example as more data becomes available and is integrated in the estimation or some data appears faulty, the current estimates and trends could be seriously unvalidated. Because of the mass propaganda, corrupted science, lack of truthful science and censorship in the mainstream media and on tech platforms, thus the elites, many people still think SARS CoV-two is a naturally evolved virus. Truthful science though proves beyond any doubt SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a biolab. After all and first of all, science shows the genetic code of SARS CoV-two contains several lab made inserts, not natural mutations or recombinations of natural viruses. Because these inserted codes PRRA (HIVGP120) are much too large and too many, and because these genetic codes only appear in other natural viruses that are genetically much too different from SARS CoV-two, the probability that SARS CoV-two has naturally mutated or recombined from other natural viruses is quasi zero. Furthermore, there exists a substantial trail of documents and testimonies, years before and after the release of SARS CoV-two about these genetic codes and the existing biochemical technology needed to insert them, financing of the research, scientific documents, patents. See the links below for sources and science. Doctor. Richard M. Fleming, MD, sworn testimony that COVID-nineteen is a bioweapon. Doctor. Richard Fleming on Montanier's discovery of HIV and spiked protein. The virus comes from a lab, appears from the Veritas Revelation Project. Are our scientists lying to us? SARS CoV-two is likely a lab construct. The origin of SARS CoV-two. Since the Genentech COVID vaccines make the human body cells produced during months up to years huge amounts than the average, dominantly only mucosal, infection with SARS CoV-two itself which for the majority of healthy unvaccinated people causes hardly any illness, just cold like symptoms, these Genentech COVID vaccines are of course themselves bioweapons and much worse than the virus itself. Furthermore, not only the produced toxic spike protein but also other components and contaminations of these vaccines are cause of serious health damage. See the links below for information about the devastating effects of the COVID vaccine bioweapons. Images, press CTRL plus for more image detail. The article COVID World 10/09/2022, estimated extra deaths thirty one million and estimated serious adverse effects 1,900,000,000 for three years of SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons was written by Pak Osmol, 10/09/2022. Appendix A Data Source. Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count. Click the Download tab below the graph on the displayed page. Downloaded CSV September 2022 from Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count. Right click the link and then Save Link As.

Il y a eu une manipulation du virus, avec des séquences ajoutées, notamment du VIH. Ce n'est pas un processus naturel, mais le résultat d'un travail minutieux de biologistes moléculaires. Les raisons de cette manipulation ne sont pas claires, mais il est possible qu'il s'agisse d'une tentative de créer un vaccin contre le sida en intégrant des séquences du VIH dans le coronavirus. Le matériel génétique du virus contient des segments de VIH qui pourraient modifier des sites antigéniques, permettant ainsi de modifier la protéine pour un vaccin. Bien que des rumeurs sur une origine humaine aient circulé, elles ont été largement réfutées, mais il existe une volonté d'étouffer ces recherches, comme l'a montré un groupe de chercheurs indiens qui a été contraint de se rétracter. --- There has been manipulation of the virus, with sequences added, including from HIV. This is not a natural process but the result of meticulous work by molecular biologists. The reasons for this manipulation are unclear, but it may involve an attempt to create an AIDS vaccine by integrating HIV sequences into the coronavirus. The virus's genetic material contains segments of HIV that could modify antigenic sites, allowing for changes to the protein for a vaccine. Although rumors of a human origin circulated, they have been largely refuted, yet there is a desire to suppress this research, as evidenced by a group of Indian researchers who were forced to retract their findings.

Doctor. Montagnier got the Nobel Prize for identifying HIV. Doctor. Montney identified 18 RNA fragments that match HIV and SIV. This is Simeon or monkey grade eight immune deficiency virus. If you look at it, remember I told you about PRRA? That's four amino acids and every amino acid requires three nucleotides. That's 12, right? 12 nucleotides. 590 amino acids or seventeen seventy nucleotide bases that match HIV-one. Now understanding that mutations occur one nucleotide at a time scientifically I'd like somebody to justify to me how that's possibly a mutation. That doesn't happen. This is the man who defines it. Every one of these red arrows and every one of these are the nucleotides that match HIV. That's why there's so much up there. It's not one. It's not just a little. It's a lot.

The speaker claims HIV exists in the spike protein, citing Luc Montagnier, who won a Nobel Prize for identifying HIV. Montagnier identified 18 RNA fragments matching HIV and SIV. The speaker questions how the PRRA insert, requiring 12 nucleotides, could be a mutation, and points to a larger HIV insert of 1,770 nucleotide bases. The speaker details the four steps required for the virus to enter the body: ACE2 receptor, TMPRSS2, furin cleavage site (PRRA), and neuropilin NRP1. They claim black people are more infected because they have more TMPRSS2 receptors. The speaker notes only SARS CoV-2 has the PRRA insert, and the NIH owns the patent for the insertion of enzymes related to the furin cleavage site, useful for HIV glycoprotein and tumor progression. Animal studies in humanized mice showed 95% died after two weeks, exhibiting spongiform encephalopathy (mad cow disease). Rhesus macaque monkeys developed inflammatory cells and Lewy bodies (Alzheimer's) in their brains, suggesting the spike protein crosses the blood-brain barrier. The speaker claims Kevin W. McCarran has warned of these neurological effects. The speaker alleges the U.S. government, through various agencies and individuals, is responsible for the virus's creation at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and that it was intentionally released in the wet market.

Scientists are investigating claims that COVID-19 was manipulated in a lab after a tiny DNA fragment matching a sequence patented by Moderna was found in the virus. The possibility of an accidental lab escape is being considered, as humans make mistakes. It is being analyzed to determine its authenticity. The team is examining whether the genetic sequence is genuine, which will take some time.

Dr. Kary Mullis, Nobel Prize winner for inventing the PCR test, explains how the test can find almost anything if amplified enough. The PCR test for COVID-19 has been misused to create false positives. Mullis discovered there was no proof linking HIV to AIDS, exposing a sham in the medical industry. He criticized CDC's profit motives and called out Anthony Fauci and Robert Gallo. Mullis wanted to expose the truth on TV but faced little support. Despite his efforts, his voice was not widely heard before his passing at age 74.

Le professeur Luc Montagnier, prix Nobel de médecine, suggère qu'il y a eu une manipulation du virus Covid-19, avec l'ajout de séquences du VIH. Il souligne que ce n'est pas naturel et que c'était un travail professionnel. Il ne spécule pas sur qui aurait pu faire cela ni sur le but de cette manipulation. Son travail consiste à exposer les faits sans accuser qui que ce soit. Translation: Professor Luc Montagnier, Nobel Prize winner in medicine, suggests there was manipulation of the Covid-19 virus, with the addition of sequences from HIV. He emphasizes it was not natural and done professionally. He does not speculate on who may have done this or the purpose behind it. His work is to present the facts without accusing anyone.

Three Nobel laureates have expressed doubts about the official thesis. They are biologist Barbara McClintock, the late Professor Walter Gilbert of Harvard, and Karim Ulrich, the 1993 Nobel laureate in chemistry. Ulrich, the inventor of PCR, a process that isolates and amplifies genes, became interested in the question of HIV and AIDS. However, when searching for scientific publications to support the claim that HIV causes AIDS, Ulrich couldn't find any references. He asked specialized researchers about their conviction, but they couldn't provide the references either. Ulrich needed the reference to renew a grant for his laboratory, but he couldn't find any evidence that HIV is the probable cause of AIDS.

Scientists are investigating claims that COVID-19 was manipulated in a lab. They are analyzing data to determine the accuracy of these claims. The possibility of a lab accident cannot be ruled out, as humans make mistakes. It is being examined whether the Wuhan lab in China was conducting virus enhancement or gene modification, leading to an accidental infection. The team is carefully examining a genetic sequence that matches one patented by Moderna for cancer research. This analysis takes time.