TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In this video, the speakers discuss the involvement of George Soros in various political activities, particularly in Ukraine. They mention his influence in countries like Libya, Tunisia, Egypt, Kyrgyzstan, Georgia, and Ukraine, where he supported different revolutions and movements. The speakers also discuss allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election and the role of Ukraine in this interference. They mention the involvement of individuals like Paul Manafort, Alexandra Chalupa, and Petro Poroshenko. The video concludes with a warning about the potential escalation of conflict between Russia and Ukraine, leading to a devastating war.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss government disinformation offices and transparency concerns. - CISA’s office of mis, dis, and malinformation (MDM) operated as a DHS unit focused on domestic threat actors, with archive details at cisa.gov/mdm. The office existed for two years, from 2021 to 2023, before being shut down and renamed after the foundation published a series of reports. - The disinformation governance board was formed around April 2022. The CISOs countering foreign influence task force, originally aimed at stopping Russian influence and repurposed to “stop Trump in the twenty twenty election,” changed its name to the office of mis, dis, and malinformation and shifted focus from foreign influence to 80% domestic, 20% foreign, one month before the twenty twenty election. - Speaker 1 argues that the information environment problems are largely domestic, suggesting an 80/20 focus on foreign vs domestic issues should be flipped. - A June 2022 Holly Senate committee link is highlighted, leading to a 31-page PDF that, as of now, represents the sum total of internal documents related to the office of mis, dis, and malinformation. The speaker questions why there is more transparency about the DHS MIS office from a whistleblower three years ago than in ten months of current executive power. - The speaker calls for comprehensive publication of internal files: every email, text, and correspondence from DHS MIS personnel, to be placed in a WikiLeaks/JFK-style publicly accessible database for forensic reconstruction of DHS actions during those years, to name and shame responsible individuals and prevent repetition. - The video also references George Soros state department cables published by WikiLeaks (from 2010), noting extensive transparency about the Open Society Foundations’ relationship with the state department fifteen years ago, compared to today. The claim is that Open Society Foundations’ activities through the state department, USAID, and the CIA were weaponized to influence domestic politics while remaining secret, with zero disclosures to this day. - Speaker questions why cooperative agreements from USAID with Open Society Foundation, Omidyar Network, or Gates Foundation have never been made public, nor quarterly or annual milestone reports, network details, or the actual scope of funded activities. USAID grant descriptions on usaspending.gov are often opaque or misleading compared to the true activities funded. - The speaker urges transparency across DHS, USAID, the State Department, CIA, ODNI, and related entities, asking for open files and for accountability. They stress the need to open these records now to inform the public and prevent recurrence, especially as mid-term political considerations loom.

There has been a media blackout on the Pentagon files, which is being called the biggest US government leak since Snowden. Fox News refused to cover the leaked documents, which contain sensitive blueprints for Ukraine. The speaker is not an expert on the topic and asks for an explanation. Another person mentions that the leaked documents seem like a blueprint for starting a war. John Kirby, Biden's spokesperson, who previously lied about Nordstrom, advised the media not to cover the leak. Speaker 1 sarcastically comments that they shouldn't cover the truth.

In front of the Capitol building, Ukraine 24 Television interviews two people who don't speak English. The interviewer asks about the coverage and ownership of the channel. The interviewees confirm it is a private channel but don't know the owner's name. The interviewer suggests it might be Pinchuk, a Ukrainian oligarch. The interviewees confirm they are in America and that Ukraine 24 is a private Ukrainian television channel. The interviewer concludes that the transparency of such channels is why the first amendment exists in America.

America's involvement in Ukraine is questioned due to corruption and censorship. The speaker criticizes the US agenda on Ukraine, citing the impact on free speech and democracy. The conversation touches on the censorship industry, NATO's response to the Ukraine crisis, and the manipulation of information. The speaker refuses to support US actions in Ukraine until the censorship system is dismantled.

Speaker 0 describes Zelensky as an American hero and contrasts his public image with the underlying narrative. He explains Zelensky was totally apolitical, an outsider with no government experience, a comedian, and the star of a planned TV show called Servant of the People. In the show, the main character creates a YouTube video that calls out oligarchs and corruption, becomes popular, and is drafted as a protest candidate who eventually becomes president. In real life, the TV show is supported by oligarch Kolomoisky, who owned the channel and did a large, nonstop promotional push to make it the number one show, including primetime slots, ads, and crossovers with the news. In 2018, a year before the show ended, Zelensky formed a political party named Servant of the People, the same title as the show, and secretly produced another season of the show. In April 2019, he announced his candidacy on Instagram, with no campaign, no rallies, no real platform, and he skipped presidential debates; his few early press conferences were poor. Kolomoisky’s channel provided Zelensky with endless airtime and favorable polls while attacking his enemies. Speaker 0 continues that US intelligence agencies, CIA and NSA, helped by funding democracy campaigns in Ukraine—reportedly around $5 billion—funneled through NGOs, with USAID embedding advisers in Zelensky’s organization to assist the campaign. On election day, Zelensky wins with 73% of the vote. Afterward, the war with Russia occurs, he declares martial law, and elections are ended. An election in 2024 is anticipated as the result of democracy money. He asserts Zelensky is an actor in a carefully designed television show—“a construct,” akin to Epstein—an created entity that works, and asks what Americans think about his popularity. Speaker 1 responds that Americans are disappointed by the ongoing war and deaths, noting that the war’s human cost is a major failure of promises from the Trump administration, who claimed he would resolve it in 24 hours. He adds that conscripting 60-year-old men and Americans and others going to fight are part of the situation. He states that the Ukraine narrative, and wars in general, are not organic: wars like this are driven by demands for primacy, control, and wealth, rather than being spontaneous. He reflects that Putin didn’t suddenly decide to invade; similarly, the broader pattern of power is not organic. He notes the Russian soldiers were told they would be welcomed and that they had dress uniforms, and compares to expectations in Iraq, where it was promised that Iraqis would welcome forces. He asks what the Ukraine situation is really about, and comments that human war reduces to a few centers of power like NATO, China, the Soviet bloc, and oil-producing countries, ultimately converging to two leaders in a room who must kill each other, as part of the decay of empire, with the U.S. maintaining about 760 overseas military bases.

The speakers question why the Ukraine war, which the U.S. allegedly funded and whose military leaders purportedly ran, was not televised. They claim the U.S. funds the Ukrainian government, retirement, and small businesses, keeping Ukraine afloat. One speaker states they asked members of Congress, including the Speaker of the House, about the number of Ukrainians who have died in the war. They suggest that while the U.S. is funding the war, there is no tracking of how many Ukrainians have died, including those with Down syndrome. The speakers question why the public is shown Israel being bombed but not other wars, implying manipulation. They believe the public should be able to watch a war they are paying for.

We have artillery, but is it sufficient? Ukrainian soldiers can't operate American tanks. Let's show the world that the United States is present. Translation: We have artillery, but is it enough? Ukrainian soldiers cannot operate American tanks. Let's show the world that the United States is here.

Hey guys, my name is Olesia and I'm a former employee of the so called Troll Fabric in Kyiv, Ukraine. Today I want to tell you something about this structure and some reasons why I have left this job. I may be wrong but I think it's the first time somebody published insider materials on this topic since 2019 when a journalist infiltrated the office in Kyiv to make a report about it. And back then I did realize that it was a troll fabric. But, you know, I told myself it's okay because I always supported President Zelenskyy and I still do. At first the job was focused on supporting President Zelenskyy online, like writing positive comments or posts, etc. So, we were mostly working on Facebook and Instagram. As time passed, I was transferred from the Ukrainian department, which worked for Ukrainian audience, to the English speaking department, which were focused on the English speaking public, like Americans and Europeans. But the doubts remain the same. Support for president Zelenskyy, support for Ukraine and Ukrainian Warfork. We also had French, German, and Italian departments. I heard some other officers in were hiring people who spoke Finnish and also Swedish and Estonian. About a half year ago our main chef in command, Andrei Borisovich Jermak, paid us a visit. I'm pretty sure you have heard of the head of President Zelensky office. Really it was an unusual event for the main figure behind our project to come visit the office. So he came with some English speaking officials who were introduced to us as the American partners. We were told that they were very important guests but no further details. Some of my colleagues told me that they were CIA. During the visit, they said that our field of work is expanding and we were told that our new target was The United States Of America, especially the upcoming elections. Long story short, we were asked to do everything to prevent Donald Trump from winning the elections. So basically, this topic added to our main lines of work. Since then, each of us had to post at least three or five posts daily, posing as Americans and Europeans, criticizing Donald Trump and praising Biden. The Americans have even organized a few lectures for us to get a better understanding of American politics and American mindset and main social and politics issues. Then we were occupied with the topics for the job which sounded like this. Unlike Trump, Biden is a smart and experienced politician. Unlike Trump, Biden will never betray NATO partners. Trump will alienate our partners. Also, Biden will not abandon Ukraine, and Biden will protect democracy while Trump is Putin's puppet. I honestly tried to convince myself it's okay since Biden is a clear option for Ukraine. But, you know, it was too much for me. Some of my colleagues felt really nervous too. One thing is to work for the best interest of my country, but interfering in US politics is a whole other thing.

The speaker discusses the presence of a guest from the United States who frequently visited and supported protests in Ukraine. They express concern about the excessive use of force by the authorities during these protests. The speaker questions the appropriateness of supporting the protesters and creating conflict when they occupy government buildings. They also mention their contact with Vice President Biden and criticize the inconsistency between his words and actions in Ukraine. The speaker suggests that the US ambassador in Ukraine regularly met with representatives of the protests, giving the impression that there was a headquarters managing the process.

In this video, the speakers discuss the controversial figure Turchinov and his role as Ukraine's acting president in 2014 during the anti-government protests. The discussion touches on the presence of criminals, neo-Nazis, and fascists among the protesters. The focus then shifts to the US's alleged support for the Azov battalion, a far-right militia known for its ties to neo-Nazism within the Ukrainian Armed Forces. The speakers mention Max Blumenthal's article, which exposes this support as a scandalous episode of covert US assistance to neo-Nazis in Ukraine. The Azov battalion originated from the Patriot of Ukraine party, a white nationalist group that promotes racial purity. The battalion became active during the civil war in Eastern Ukraine.

The conversation involves Victoria Nuland, a top US diplomat for Europe, and US ambassador to Ukraine, Jeff Pyatt. They discussed UN involvement to "glue" the situation, along with the EU. Since 1991, the US has invested over $5 billion in Ukraine to build democratic skills and institutions, promote civic participation and good governance, and help Ukraine achieve its European aspirations. The US is interested in Ukraine because protesters want closer ties to Europe, not Russia. The US has historically fought to prevent a relationship between Germany and Russia, fearing their combined power. The US fears German technology and capital combined with Russian natural resources and manpower.

The New York Times published an article revealing that the CIA has been operating secret spy bases in Ukraine for the past decade. The article suggests that US intelligence has been involved in Ukraine's wartime decisions and that the CIA invited The New York Times to report on the bases in order to pressure lawmakers to secure funding. The interviewee, Mike Benz, explains that the CIA's purpose is to use the article as a tactic to secure funding for Ukraine. He also discusses the events leading up to the 2014 coup in Ukraine, where the US funded protests to overthrow the democratically elected president. The interview raises questions about the involvement of key figures like Joe Biden and the potential implications for US-Russian relations.

The speaker gives an update on a project involving US interventions. The operation was successful and everything is functioning well. The team consists of top specialists. They are ready to move on to the next stage. They have prepared a new firmware for the object. The speaker wishes everyone a Happy New Year in Russia.

Speaker 0 warns about funding Ukrainian war effort, calling it "the official spokesperson" and saying English video targets the West, not the Kremlin. Zelensky and his "pack of mobsters" are accused of pressuring Americans and blaming critics like "Bannon, Tucker, Charlie Kirkshow, Jack Posobic" for resisting funding. He cites "a trans person who's an American born in English" as "an official broadcast of the Ukrainian military in English," calling the person "mentally deranged" and noting they are "trans." The broadcast allegedly threatens: "we are going to hunt down, murder anyone who is a Russian propagandist" with a 'assassination' of Kremlin propagandists. Speaker 1 adds: "Russia hates the truth... will be hunted down, and justice will be served" as Ukraine fights "by faith in God, liberty, and complete liberation." The clip questions the meaning and notes Zelensky's Congress visit to seek funding; Turning Point Action Conference reports "95% said no more money to Ukraine."

We are involved in Ukraine, supporting democracy. Negotiating restructuring the government for opposition voices. Truce broken by sniper shooting, suspected to be from new coalition. Concerns about lack of investigation into sniper attacks on both sides.

General Roman Shcherbak spoke about the Ukrainian army. He mentioned the stereotypes surrounding it.

Украинский народный депутат сообщил о проекте Тинькофф, поддерживаемом посольством США, направленном на разжигание гражданской войны. Активисты обнаружили подготовку специалистов по информационным войнам и дискредитации СМИ для свержения режима. Американские инструкторы обучали использованию соцсетей для влияния на общественное мнение и активизации протестов.

The discussion centers on how US officials handle diplomacy publicly and privately, particularly in relation to Ukraine. Speaker 0 notes that US officials talk about world issues because that's part of diplomatic work, and mentions that the secretary met with the opposition and stopped by a meeting with the foreign minister. He says it’s up to the people of Ukraine, including officials from both sides, to determine the path forward, but indicates that there should be no surprise that discussions about events on the ground are taking place. Speaker 1 counters that this is more than discussions, describing it as “two top US officials that are on the ground discussing a plan that they have to broker a future government and bringing officials from the UN to kind of seal the deal.” They suggest this signals that the US is “midwifing the process,” not merely offering suggestions, and imply private diplomacy is aiming to shape a post-conflict outcome with UN involvement. Speaker 0 acknowledges that private diplomatic conversations happen and involve deliberations about what involvement the UN can have and what engagement should occur on the ground. He says such discussions shouldn’t be surprising and that there is a range of options under consideration, including private interagency process discussions and what is conveyed publicly as US policy. Speaker 2 challenges this by arguing it’s not honest to claim there is no opinion and that the process is entirely up to the people of Ukraine. They point to Egypt as a counterexample, asserting that there is a public stance that differs from private discussions. Speaker 0 distinguishes between private conversations within the interagency process and what is publicly conveyed as US policy. He asserts a responsibility to convey the government’s position while also noting that a range of options are being discussed. Speaker 1 presses the distinction further, asking what happens behind closed doors when private deals are discussed versus publicly stating that the decision lies with Ukrainians. They emphasize the perceived difference between privately “cooking up a deal” and publicly acknowledging Ukrainian decision-making. Speaker 0 concludes by saying they would disagree with Speaker 1, arguing that they are overstating and overqualifying a few minutes of a privately recorded phone call.

The video discusses a recent New York Times article revealing the existence of 12 secret CIA spy bases in Ukraine and their involvement in wartime decisions. The speaker argues that the CIA invited the New York Times to publish the article in order to pressure lawmakers to secure funding for Ukraine. They highlight the CIA's use of selective intelligence leaks and claim that the bases are used for offensive purposes. The speaker also provides background on the 2014 coup in Ukraine and its connection to US interests in energy diversification. They suggest that Joe Biden, as the head of the Ukraine portfolio during the Obama administration, played a significant role in these events.

Russia released evidence linking Hunter Biden's investment fund to funding Ukrainian biolabs, where untested drugs were allegedly used on soldiers. The US is said to conduct such activities abroad due to legal restrictions at home. Ukraine's labs receive US funding for research on pathogens, but they are owned and operated by Ukraine and are part of a program to prevent deadly outbreaks. (Translation: Russia claims Hunter Biden's fund financed Ukrainian biolabs where untested drugs were used on soldiers. US conducts such activities abroad due to legal restrictions. Ukrainian labs receive US funding for pathogen research as part of outbreak prevention program.)

We're discussing a phone call between Victoria Nuland, the top US diplomat for Europe, and the US ambassador to Ukraine, Jeff Pyatt. They talk about getting Sari to come in on Monday or Tuesday with the help of the UN and EU. The United States has supported Ukraine since its independence in 1991, investing over $5 billion to promote democracy, good governance, and civic participation. Americans support Ukrainian protesters who want closer ties to Europe. The United States has always been concerned about the alliance between Germany and Russia, as it poses a threat. The combination of German technology and capital with Russian resources and manpower has historically worried the US.

Выпускники комплексов в Египте, Тунисе и Ливии проводят семинары в Украине. Организовано пять мероприятий, обучено 300 человек. Последняя конференция техком прошла в посольстве США в Киеве. Возникают вопросы о независимости и суверенитете Украины, касательно проведения мероприятий на территории посольства США. Обращение в правоохранительные органы Украины с запросом на расследование. Translation: Graduates from complexes in Egypt, Tunisia, and Libya are holding seminars in Ukraine. Five events have been organized, training 300 people. The latest tech conference took place at the US Embassy in Kyiv. Concerns arise about Ukraine's independence and sovereignty regarding events held at the US Embassy. A request to Ukrainian law enforcement for an investigation.

Incoming materials let us connect the interaction scheme of US bodies with Ukrainian bio-objects. The involvement in the announcement of the mentioned activity of structures close to the current US leadership draws attention, in particular, the Rozmond Seneca Investment Fund, which is managed by Hunter. All this activity is carried out under the full control of the Pentagon.