reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The discussion centers on a rapid escalation of online activity described as military bot operations, which the speakers associate with attempts to cancel Candace Owens from Australia after October 7. They note a pattern in which bot activity appears when certain topics are discussed, including Fort Huachuca, the Obas Gai, and Cairo/African plains references, tying these to an eyewitness who insists he saw Brian Harpole and believed there was an all-hands-on-deck meeting the day before. The speakers stress a broader pattern of activity on the same day and say they verified the eyewitness’s account with people stationed at the base. A longer clip from Baron Coleman is introduced, focusing on what it means to see a SAM call sign on a plane, especially those flying from Andrews outside Washington, D.C. Coleman argues that a key piece of evidence in Candace Owens’ story is a jet used exclusively by few people—presidential family members, cabinet officials, and military generals at the Pentagon—present at the location of a high-level meeting the morning of September 9, the day before Charlie Kirk’s alleged neutralization. The jet is described as a Special Air Mission (SAM) jet; the conversation explains that SAM call signs designate flights carrying high-ranking officials, with Air Force One and Air Force Two as the corresponding designated callsigns when the president or vice president is aboard. The flight logs show a jet with the rarely used SAM000 call sign, which indicates a highly sensitive passenger manifest, traveling on August 25 from Joint Base Andrews to Colorado Springs (home of the 10th Special Forces Group), then to Las Vegas, and later a return leg to Joint Base Andrews as SAM658. Speaker 0 questions whether this pattern means a very important person traveled on the flight, noting the call sign changes from a high-priority SAM to an RCH (a less VIP designation) and later to SAM as the VIP reappears. They discuss the possibility that someone significant either boarded or disembarked in Las Vegas, with Venus noted as an empty-flight designation when only the pilots are aboard. The timeline is tied to Brian Harpole’s statements about UVU event preparations, with the August 24 date identified as when intel gathering and hard conversations began, described by Harpole as starting two weeks prior and documented in a decentralized command app. The speakers compare this to “Operation Valhalla,” which they say began on August 24 and ended on August 27. They observe that on August 25, a VIP flight to Colorado Springs occurred, the same day the aircraft flew to Las Vegas, after which the log shows an RCH designation on a subsequent leg, suggesting a less-than-top-tier passenger on that leg. The speaker notes they have multiple emails confirming Fort Huachuca as an intelligence base, reinforcing the claim that the base is linked to covert missions rather than routine operations. They express a belief in the credibility of the eyewitness account about Harpole and say they plan to feature the testimony and related details, including additional flight logs (referred to as the finishing touch on SUBTV) and visuals from a car investigation, on kennethowens.com or similar platforms. The overarching aim is to explore whether Egyptian planes are connected to Israel, which they say would explain a mass panic. They emphasize continuing to pursue these narratives while minimizing distractions from “timelines and delivering this information.”

We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it. In between the finger pointing, there was grieving. On Friday, the White House flew the flags at half staff, which got some criticism. The loss of your friend, Charlie Kirk. May I ask, sir, personally, how are you holding up over the last day and a half, sir? I think very good. Yes. He's at the fourth stage of grief, construction. It's demolition, Demolition, construction, construction. This is not how an adult grieves the murder of someone he called a friend. This is how a four year old mourns a goldfish, okay?

The video centers on Candace and a claim about Egyptian private military contractors being flown to America on a top-secret mission and landing at a private military base in Utah on the day of the Charlie Kirk assassination. The presenters show photos of private military subcontractors and describe them as the “baddest, hardest, most battle trained” soldiers, implying their involvement is significant to the Charlie Kirk case. They question why Egyptian military contractors would be in Provo, Utah, and why they did not return to Cairo, asking who they were planning to “take out next.” One speaker states that, according to a person close to someone who was aboard the flight, the aircraft did not simply stop in Utah for routine servicing. They claim the plane carried military subcontractors and that these individuals were dropped off in Provo, yet did not reboard for Cairo. They assert the flight departed Provo on September 10 and returned to Cairo on September 11, with allegedly missing people from the plane. The speaker emphasizes that the flight radar investigation shows a Cairo-to-Paris-to-France-to-Bannat, North Dakota route around that period, and notes that on September 10 the plane departed Provo at 07:14 AM local time. They insist the people aboard the plane were not the same individuals who later appeared on the flight’s return. The speaker contends this information was provided by a female source who knows an Egyptian military subcontractor personally. They acknowledge she did not claim the mission was related to Charlie Kirk, only that it was a top-secret operation, possibly a discreet joint military exercise, so hidden that people were urged to ignore it. The speaker describes the revelation as terrifying yet galvanizing, claiming it prompted bravery and a push to root out perceived evil in society. The discussion then shifts to Kash Patel, referencing a Daily Mail article about him shutting down a Charlie Kirk foreign intelligence probe in a feud with Trump’s counterterror chief. The speaker suggests Patel’s stance raises questions and asserts that Patel’s approach contrasts with what they would expect if there were genuine efforts to investigate Charlie Kirk’s murder, noting that Trump and Trump family members would presumably be involved in questioning the narrative. They criticize Patel for discouraging further inquiry, comparing him to Dr. Fauci in his alleged resistance to investigation. The speaker challenges Kash Patel to dispute the claims, asking him to confirm whether the plane truly came for routine servicing or for a discreet mission, and to disclose the truth about who was aboard and why they were in Provo, Utah.

After Charlie Kirk was shot, the speaker notes the arrest of a little old man named George Zinn in DC and anchors on July 20 as pivotal, with coincidences around that date. He cites searches for Tempanogos Regional Hospital in Utah, questions about whether Kirk had an autopsy, and Utah medical examiner Deidra Amaro; an IP address originating in Israel is said to have accessed Amaro’s name and Utah figures Bo Mason (appointed July 17) and Matab Syed, later replaced by Robert Bowles. The speaker highlights a Bombardier Global 6,500 with tail number November1098Lima that flew near Orem at 204 feet on the day of Kirk's death and again 25 minutes later; Israel-origin IPs also searched Hunter Kozak and several Surgeons at Tempanogos Regional Hospital (examples include Steven Neelman, Robert Patterson). He urges investigators to check VPNs and IP tracks.

Charlie Kirk was taken to Tempanogos Regional Hospital. “Psycho District Of Columbia.” “Here's where, again, on September, right there, you see the searches for Timpanogos Regional Hospital, people looking for where they could try to occur.” “This spike of interest in Timpanogos Regional Hospital out of BC, and then no interest for two solid months before the shooting.” “the July 20 anchor date.” “the day before, somebody in the District Of Columbia says, we should really make sure we know what the Tempanogos Regional Hospital is.” “I thought, I wonder who the medical examiner is in Utah.” “Deidra Amaro.” “06/30/2025. In Israel.” “an IP address originating in Israel decided they were very interested in Deidre Amaro.” The speaker then cites researching “the surgeons at the Orem branch of Tampanoagos Regional Hospital,” listing “Steven Neelman,” “Robert Patterson, MD,” “Lee Trotter,” “Lee Patterson,” “Brian Gill,” and “Richard Rasmussen.” “If I'm the FBI, I might ask, is this related to an assassination where they rushed the body there, and there was a surgeon that declared Charlie Kirk a Superman and claims he found the bullet, and then signed the death certificate, and there was a watchdog.”

The speaker addresses the claim that Candace Owens made that Charlie Kirk was 100% hit from the front, bullets shoot straight, and that we know he was shot from the front. The speaker argues logically about entry wound in the neck with no exit wound: the only logical thing that could have stopped the bullet in the neck would be the spine. If the bullet came in and ended up hitting the spine, whether it went down, around, or out the armpit, the fact that it hit his throat and went into his neck and then didn’t go out the back would logically lead to the belief that he was shot almost from straight on or perhaps from an off-center angle like 01:00 or 11:00, because the trajectory would have had to hit the spine to stop. If it hadn’t hit the spine, an angled shot from that side could have torn through the jugular or gone through to the other side. The speaker concludes that the only logical conclusion is that he was hit from the front. The speaker mentions the possibility of a drone and a second shooter at a much farther away position, praising Gary Melton at Paramount Tactical for drone surveillance. Three-D renderings and images of the campus layout are expected, aiming to determine definitively whether anyone else in an elevated position had a clear line of sight to shoot Charlie Kirk from the front. The speaker dismisses trapdoors or a bullet coming from the ground or AI as unlikely, asserting that the observed reaction of Charlie Kirk’s body supports a front-shot scenario. The speaker notes that something appeared to blow him out of the chair and questions how the necklace could have been blown off. The speaker suggests another type of device could have been simulated at the moment of the shooting, possible with gas-powered or air-powered technology that agencies like Mossad possess; they could have designed a camera with a hidden gun that would shoot Charlie from the front. According to the speaker, the logical sequence is: Charlie Kirk was shot, the bullet entered the neck, most likely hit the spine, and caused the described body reaction. Until more definitive proof of another logical explanation is found, the speaker remains aligned with the front-shot interpretation. The speaker then invites viewers to comment with “front” or “side” and to participate in a Twitter Space at 5 PM where an expert will discuss Charlie Kirk’s security detail. The speaker identifies themselves as Ryan Mehta and signs off, inviting viewers to join at 05:00.

The speaker asserts that Charlie Kirk was shot from the front and that the bullet did not exit his body, with at least a fragment of the bullet recovered from his neck. This is presented as the part of the story that is true and is claimed to dispel various theories. The speaker states they have fact-checked this information from multiple sources over more than a week of review. The fragment is described as being recovered “right around here,” approximately in line with Charlie Kirk’s shoulder blade, near the center of the back, in a location “almost in line with your shoulder blade.” The speaker argues this location provides a bullet trajectory: the bullet entered in the described area, was stopped there, and a fragment was pulled from the neck region along the spine’s line. A key point emphasized is that a .30-06 round was not recovered intact. The speaker asserts that there was no recovered bullet from a .30-06, stating that “They did not recover a bullet from a 30 odd six. They didn’t recover a bullet from a 30 odd six. Just didn't happen.” They contrast this with the presence of .30-06 bullets in some context, implying that while .30-06 rounds were found, no complete bullet was recovered. The speaker notes that death certificates in suicide cases typically reflect the gun and the bullet when both are known, and claims that there is not a bullet reflected on Charlie Kirk’s death certificate because a .30-06 bullet was not recovered. The speaker asserts that the information has been cross-checked with multiple sources and that it undermines other theories, reinforcing that common sense supports their account. The closing remark addresses hunters and military personnel, acknowledging agreement with their perspective: “Hunters and military men rejoice. It turns out that common sense still rules the roost. Okay? You guys were right.”

The video investigates whether Charlie Kirk was wearing a vest and how that could change perspective. The narrator, who says he knows nothing about guns but trusts Kyle Sarifen, passes through what Kyle showed him. Viewers are asked to watch the chest reaction before a neck hole appears, with explanations that a white vest under the shirt could hide a bullet hole or black letters on the shirt could be struck. The shooter’s position is argued; a shot from the opposite side is unlikely. The speaker suggests the most likely scenario is that Kirk wore a white vest; a long rifle bullet went through the vest, through the chest, hit the spinal cord, and ricocheted out the throat. Blood splatter could be explained if the vest prevented splatter. CCTV footage is referenced; the speaker remains uncertain about a trans shooter and distrusts FBI statements. Kyle’s gun expertise is highlighted.

Andrew Colvet, TP USA spokesperson, said he talked to the coroner and he's called me with an update: Charlie was shot from the front in the left 30 yard six, and he was a man of steel, they said, and it bounced off the neck bones. I misread the report saying they didn't find a bullet. No. They said they found the bullet, which is insane. They're claiming from the coroner, via a TPOC spokesperson, that the 30 odd six bullet goes in. Didn't find the bullet. I was wrong. But high powered rifle rounds come out over 2,000 feet per second and go right through things; if it hits bone it explodes. I'll call Andrew for an update. Memorial and funeral's tomorrow. Pray for Charlie Kirk and Erica. Get ready for more leftist terror attacks.

Speaker 0 says 'The FBI continues to destroy its reputation as a trustworthy investigative agency' and questions Charlie Kirk's death: 'Was it a 30 odd six round that killed Charlie Kirk or a different kind of bullet? Was it a Mauser rifle that was used?' They ask why the Utah Valley campus crime scene is not secure and link it to the pattern after the Butler rally. Zeb Boykin, a former marine sniper, claims 'I do believe I know where the bullet ended up' after analyzing footage. He notes a ricochet off water bottles or a table, two frames showing 'the bullet on exit,' and that it 'would hit the building.' He cites rapid cleanup, 'a 20 foot ladder on the window,' window repairs, and a tampering video with a man in black directing people as attention shifts upward. ER nurses identify an exit wound; 'the ballistics don't lie.'

The speaker addresses several common claims about the deceased, providing corrected explanations based on mortuary practice. They state that the body was embalmed, which is why the hands appear waxy; embalming firms the tissues, removes circulation, and creates a smooth, waxy look, after which cosmetics are applied to restore color. In this case, the embalmer apparently was attempting to cover bruising, rather than color-correct, resulting in a heavy, dark, and incorrect shade that makes the hands read as unnatural or mannequin-like to nonexperts. The speaker emphasizes that the appearance is due to embalming and cosmetics, not refrigeration, a week-long delay, or Hollywood special effects. Regarding autopsies, the speaker asserts that high-profile homicide equals automatic autopsy, a standard procedure that applies regardless of who the person is. They argue that the body was autopsied immediately and embalmed immediately, and that all of this can occur within a twenty-four hour window when involved parties include the family, law enforcement, and, in this case, the vice president, implying funeral homes can move quickly when necessary. On the matter of whether the body could have had time to deteriorate or be left unrefrigerated, the speaker rejects the notion, reiterating that the process involved was rapid autopsy and embalming, not a delayed or neglected handling. When addressing the appearance of the hands, the speaker explains that what is seen is not a wax dummy but embalming with cosmetics. The embalmer’s goal was to cover bruising, but the cosmetic work was done poorly—too heavy, too dark, and the wrong shade—leading to the perception of aging or an unnatural look. The speaker also tackles a question about a missing indent where a wedding ring would be. They explain that men’s rings often sit differently than women’s; rings slide over larger knuckles and may not leave a deep indent. They note that the groove may not be permanent, and point out that watching videos of him shows him handling his rings, suggesting the indentation isn’t definitive. Furthermore, embalming changes the appearance by firming and plumping tissues, which can smooth small lines, wrinkles, and minor indentations. The speaker gives an example of elderly individuals looking years younger after embalming because fine wrinkles fill in. In summary, the video argues that the observed waxy hands result from embalming and cosmetics, not refrigeration or negligence; autopsies are performed promptly in high-profile cases; the rapid timeline is plausible given involving parties; and ring indent explanations combine anatomy (knuckles) with embalming effects, rather than indicating a missing feature.

Colin of Project Constitution sits down with Tyler (the interviewer’s name in the transcript isn’t consistently labeled; the speaker identifying themselves as “Speaker 1”) to discuss an in-depth, ongoing investigation into Charlie Kirk’s assassination and related events. The conversation covers timeline疑s, weapon analysis, hospital logistics, key individuals (notably Erica Kirk, Tyler Boyer, Terrrell Farnsworth, Candace Owens), and alleged foreign and domestic entanglements, with a focus on unfiltered details the team has uncovered. Key points and claims from the discussion: - Initial reaction and approach to Charlie Kirk’s assassination - The team initially accepted the FBI’s narrative but began seeing inconsistencies as reports alternated about suspect custody. Within days after the shooting, the crime scene was reportedly destroyed and the grass replaced with pavers at the university where Kirk spoke. - Video analysis reportedly shows the ground position of the shooter that the FBI cropped out, leading to questions about whether the shooter’s location and the weapon’s origin were accurately represented. - Weapon and ballistics questions - The team raised red flags about the reported firearm: a 30-odd-six was described, but ballistic experts argued that such a round would likely have killed or severely injured the target differently, prompting the theory that the weapon claim did not match the injuries observed. - The investigative team posits the use of an explosion intended to mimic past assassination patterns (e.g., MLK-era examples) and argues the actual kill injuries do not align with a 30-odd-six. - The team’s conclusion, based on crime scene photos, argues the presence of black shards and shards consistent with a microphone (a Rode wireless mic) that shattered on impact; burn marks on Charlie Kirk, and similar black shard traces observed in Candace Owens’ released SUV photos are cited as corroborating evidence. - They propose that an explosion occurred in proximity to the event, with a separate high-powered rifle shot possibly emitted by a drone—suggesting a drone sniper may have fired, not a ground-based shooter, and that the supersonic crack and potential muzzle flash were not from a conventional rifle fire but from a bullet transitioning from supersonic to subsonic speeds, creating a pressure cone. - Hospital choice and post-event handling - Charlie was taken to Tipanogos Hospital rather than a closer facility. Officials reportedly claimed this was to access a higher-grade trauma center, but the timeline questions why the closer hospital wasn’t used and how the decision was made in real time. - A witness (a landscaper at Tipanogos) described the sequence of events: an SUV delivering Charlie Kirk to the hospital, then a second SUV with Mikey McCoy entering through a doctor entrance and leaving, raising questions about who was picked up and where those individuals went afterward. - The FBI reportedly confiscated hospital security camera footage, which the team views as suspicious in a non-crime-scene context. - Candace Owens’ show highlighted an allegation that a surgeon attempted to access the body before Erica Kirk could see it; the surgeon allegedly faced FBI resistance to re-enter the patient area. There is a contested claim about “Superman neck” and whether the surgeon ever stated such language. - Erica Kirk: background, ties, and credibility - Erica is described as potentially military-trained and highly prepared; the team explored her past, tying her to Liberty University’s Falkirk Center and alleged trafficking connections, and to Romanian networks. They assert a pattern of deception—multiple inconsistent stories about how Erica and Charlie met, and extensive past relationships with multiple former partners. - They accuse Erica of deleting past social media and press content, pressuring photographers, and hiding past associations. - The team claims Erica has ties to a broader “Mormon Mafia” network tied to Mitt Romney, with connections to Utah and Arizona. They assert ties to CIA and other security entities, and claim involvement in trafficking and political influence networks. - Tyler Boyer, Terrell Farnsworth, and family/political entanglements - Tyler Boyer is described as deeply connected to the “Mormon Mafia” and as someone who previously ran Turning Point, with shell companies enabling political and charitable activities. The interview alleges he conducted surveillance on Colin and has conflicts of interest in Charlie Kirk’s case. - Terrell Farnsworth and his family connections are described as deeply entrenched in the network; Farnsworth’s stepfather reportedly held a senior position at Duncan Aviation, connected to alleged assassination logistics; Michael Burke (Farnsworth cousin) is identified as a top prosecutor connected to Tyler Robertson’s defense. - The discussion highlights a potential conflict of interest: Farnsworth’s cousin is the defense attorney for Tyler Robertson, creating a potential conflict, given Farnsworth’s role in the case and as a witness who allegedly handled the crime scene (removing SD cards and contaminating evidence). - Investigative aims and future directions - The team seeks a complete timeline that identifies every participant’s role and actions, both to present to the public and to pursue potential legal recourse. - They propose a documentary or comprehensive public analysis to expose alleged lies and inconsistencies and to push for accountability, either through court proceedings or public discourse. - They anticipate possible outcomes for Tyler Robertson’s case (conviction via public opinion, or a plea deal) and suggest the possibility of deeper CIA involvement in the radicalization and online manipulation processes surrounding the case. - They emphasize the risk to investigators and supporters, including concerns about surveillance, shadow banning, and potential threats or actions against prominent figures involved in the investigation. - Closing sentiment - Colin reiterates the importance of citizen journalism and collaboration with Candace Owens, Sam Parker, Baron Coleman, and others in pursuing truth and accountability. The interview ends with a pledge to continue the investigation and to keep the public informed as new information emerges.

We hit new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it. In between the finger pointing, there was grieving. On Friday, the White House flew the flags at half staff, which got some criticism. But on a human level, you can see how hard the president is taking this. 'Maconditions on the loss of your friend Charlie Kirk. May I ask, sir, personally, how are you holding up over the last day and a half, sir? I think very good.' 'Yes. He's at the fourth stage of grief, construction. Demolition, construction. This is not how an adult grieves the murder of someone he called a friend. This is how a four year old mourns a goldfish.'

Say. Charlie was shot at that event. He was transported to a local hospital where he later passed. Last night, his body was moved to the office the state office of the medical examiner. We will continue to facilitate movements to get him home today and with his family.

Discussion covers autopsy status: "I did do the request. They emailed me back. Didn't He did not go in for an autopsy. The death certificate was signed by the doctor at the hospital. Oh, okay." They consider adding "a field clip documenting that" to the case, "not giving that there was no autopsy in a month or two and we both forget about it, we can just go and reference that?" Also noted: "it's $2.87 off the clear to the hospital." "I need an officer at Timpanogos Hospital to come stage in the emergency room bay." The team coordinates: "Jesse just told me that he just got on the phone and Charlie's wife is coming to Signature and to bring her car over here for her right now." "5 89 is en route to temp hospital." They request "an additional unit at the back ER door as well." "Charlie’s wife is coming to land at Signature, you said?" "Jesse's gonna go to Duncan right now and pick up a car for her." There is confusion about landing: "They said they were landing at Duncan, so I don't know where they're landing, but we will just kinda play it by ear, I think." "Command3J369, did you copy my traffic"

"Charlie was brought dead to the hospital." "Charlie was being shot from on top." "No, it didn't go through." "It went down his spine, exploded in his heart. Fragments went in there, which makes sense." "That's what happens." "So this is ballistics." "I'm a ballistics expert." "Now understand. He's being shot from above." "But, absolutely, there's no way you get shot with 30 on six. It doesn't go through." "He shot from up high. He goes down and explodes." "His memorial's tomorrow in Arizona. We'll be covering it live." "I read a press report that got it wrong." "Let ballistic experts know we'll break it all down, but that's the facts as we know them right now." "God bless you all. God bless Charlie Kirk."

Transcript covers immediate police/dispatch actions: "I did do the request. They emailed me back. Didn't He did not go in for an autopsy. The death certificate was signed by the doctor at the hospital." A request to "do a field clip documenting that" and to "add a stuff to the case" noting "not giving that there was no autopsy in a month or two and we both forget about it, we can just go and reference that?" It adds: "it's $2.87 off the clear to the hospital" and "I need an officer at Timpanogos Hospital to come stage in the emergency room bay." Other updates: "Charlie’s wife is coming to Signature and to bring her car over here for her right now." "5 89 is en route to temp hospital." "One of the additional units... back ER door." Location confusion: "They said they were landing at Duncan... play it by ear." "I’m just wondering if he were to flee the location quickly, what where he would about. Logical locations where he would go." "Command3J369, did you copy my traffic"

"We had some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it." "In between the finger pointing, there was grieving." "On Friday, the White House flew the flags at half staff, which got some criticism." "But on a human level, you can see how hard the president is taking this." "The loss of your friend, Charlie Kirk." "May I ask, sir, personally, how are you holding up over the last day and a half, sir?" "I think very good." "Yes. He's at the fourth stage of grief, construction." "Demolition, Demolition, construction. Construction," "This is not how an adult grieves the murder of someone he called a friend." "This is how a four year old mourns a goldfish." "Okay?"

Speaker 0: I'm struggling to believe that these hands on the open casket of the live performance of Charlie Kirk—who was allegedly murdered—are real. I asked GPT to confirm whether the hands were real. The wider shot confirms it even more clearly: the hands lying on the suit look artificial. The texture is too smooth, the color is flat and waxy, there are no veins, pores, or natural warmth. The positioning is stiff and mannequin-like, not how a relaxed human hand would rest. The hand with pink nails is clearly real. To confirm, the hands on the body in the suit aren’t real; they look like wax or a mannequin or some sort of prop. After I sent this message, I got a notification. I hadn’t been on ChatGPT for ages; the first time I started diving back in, it came up saying that it looks like my server responded with the wrong SSL. Speaker 1: Oh my god. He actually asked ChatGPT if the hands were real, not if they were deceased, just are they real? And then acted like he solved the crime novel when the AI said no, they’re waxy. Congrats—you outsmarted a robot with a bad riddle. But here’s the hilarious part: everything ChatGPT listed as proof they were fake—waxy texture, flat color, stiffness, and the way the hands are positioned—is literally embalming 101. You accidentally read off my mortuary science textbook, so thanks for the assist, buddy. Bruh. All of this conspiracy energy makes me realize how little people actually know about death care. Speaker 2: Very next day. They didn’t even have time to refrigerate him and perform an autopsy. I mean, obviously we saw what happened. We saw what happened. Thank god I have not seen it; I don’t want to see that. But I can assure you that that is not a person. That is not real. For it to get to this level, it’s going to have to have been at least a week. I remember, but I’ve never worked in a funeral home. If there’s a debate, I don’t want to start it, because if you don’t see it, I can’t help the blind, you know what I’m saying? Speaker 1: And then there’s her; she literally says she’s never worked at a funeral home and then launches into a whole CSI monologue. Like, no. Have you worked in a funeral home? Again, no. Then why are you out here diagnosing embalmed?

The speaker tracks online searches about Charlie Kirk’s hospitalization at Tempanogos Regional Hospital, noting a spike around July 20 and a District Of Columbia query the day before: "we should really make sure we know what the Tempanogos Regional Hospital is. We really should make sure we know the day before he gets shot." They question whether an autopsy was performed, asking, "I wonder who the medical examiner is in Utah" and citing "Deidra Amaro" as the Utah medical examiner. An IP address from Israel looked up "Deidre Amaro" on 06/30/2025. The search expands to surgeons at the Orem branch: "Steven Neelman," "Robert Patterson, MD," "Lee Trotter," "Lee Patterson," "Brian Gill," "Richard Rasmussen"—all with Israel-origin IPs around July 19-22. They speculate about VPNs and ask if this relates to "an assassination where they rushed the body there, and there was a surgeon that declared Charlie Kirk a Superman and claims he found the bullet, and then signed the death certificate, and there was a watchdog." "I'm not drawing conclusions tonight."

Speaker analyzes whether Charlie Kirk wore a bulletproof vest, guided by Kyle Sarifen. He cites a moment where 'something caused his body to react that way before we see the hole in the neck' 'pay close attention to his chest and the reaction.' He presents two possibilities: 'there could easily be a white vest under it' or 'the solid white was still there, they got filled in behind it.' He suggests the mic was knocked off and argues that 'the bullet went straight through the vest, through holes in the chest, hits the spinal cord, hits a bone, and then comes actually ricochets and comes out the throat,' with 'the exit wound was here in the throat' and 'blood gushing out there.' He mentions CCTV footage, a long rifle, and says he's not convinced of a trans shooter, noting FBI lies and that 'Kyle does this stuff for a living.'

"We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it." "In between the finger pointing, there was grieving." "On Friday, the White House flew the flags at half staff, which got some criticism." "And by the way, right there, you see all the trucks. They've just started construction of the new ballroom for the White House, and it's gonna be a beauty." "Doctor. Dolce is on the loss of your friend Charlie Kirk." "May I ask, sir, personally, how are you holding up over the last day and a half, sir?" "I think very good." "Yes. He's at the fourth stage of grief, construction." "This is not how an adult grieves the murder of someone he called a friend." "This is how a four year old mourns a goldfish."

I spoke with Andrew Colvin, the official spokesman for DP USA, a confidant of Charlie Kirk. I put my report out about him talking to the surgeon that was there when Charlie was brought dead to the hospital, and Charlie was being shot from on top into the throat. He says it didn't go through, which makes sense, I think. It went down his spine, exploded in his heart. Fragments went in there, which makes sense, and fragments bounced back up. He claims, 'I'm a ballistics expert,' and argues this isn't a straight-on shot; it would hit bone and ricochet. We don't have answers yet. He dismisses rumors: 'Total total crap' about TPUSA. Memorial's tomorrow in Arizona; 'we'll be covering it live, and I'm gonna report the best information as I have it as it unfolds.' He apologizes for a misreport and notes Charlie Kirk shirts at Domain North Austin.

The transcript asserts that Pete Hegseth’s private aircraft, tail number 99Dash0404, with a special air mission call sign, was involved in activities tied to official business for the president or the vice president. On September 8, two days before Charlie Kirk’s murder, the aircraft landed at an air force base three miles from Fort Huachuca, with a special air mission call sign. Mitch Snow is quoted as reporting that Erica Kirk and Cabot Phillips were seen in the lobby of the Candlewood Inn and Suites on Fort Huachuca on September 8, and that on September 9 he saw Brian Harpole, who has a security firm located about eleven minutes from Fort Huachuca, leaving a meeting with people described as VIPs or connected to the US government. The claim continues that on September 9, Pete Hegseth’s plane, 99Dash0404, departed Fort Huachuca, went to Fort Bliss, then returned to the DC area. The transcript states that, according to flight trackers, the aircraft operated under the special air mission SAM702 and was involved in activities at Fort Huachuca in the days leading up to Charlie Kirk’s death. It also references video footage and photographs allegedly showing Pete Hegseth in San Juan meeting with government officials about narco-terrorism, suggesting a discrepancy between those reports and the Fort Huachuca activities. Thirty days after Kirk’s murder, on 10/10/2025, the same aircraft, 99Dash0404, reportedly appeared again in the air under the call sign SAM112, flying from DC to Fort Huachuca and back to DC, with a purported sightseeing detour over Eastern Tennessee. The transcript claims the AES plant in Eastern Tennessee, an explosives manufacturing facility with a Department of Defense contract for a small amount of explosives (described as enough for a shaped charge for a weaponized microphone), was destroyed in a blast that killed all workers; 23,000 pounds of explosives allegedly went off. The narrative links this event to the same aircraft’s route, saying the plane descended over the AES plant on its way back to DC. The speaker connects the AES explosion to Charlie Kirk’s death, claiming the device involved could be a weaponized lavalier microphone, and mentions people and institutions tied to Fort Huachuca, including Laurie Fransky’s anti-EMP technology work and references to Erica Kirk’s involvement in a film on Fort Huachuca depicting an assassin on a rooftop with a rifle. The speaker states these observations are verifiable via flight trackers and asserts that these are not conspiracy theories, inviting verification. The overall assertion is that Pete Hegseth’s plane, operating under special air mission calls SAM702 and later SAM112, was present at Fort Huachuca before Kirk’s death and later diverged to observe the AES plant explosion, implying a connection or coordination.