TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

A presidential memorandum requires the immediate declassification of all FBI files related to the Crossfire Hurricane investigation, which is considered an instance of weaponization of law enforcement. The aim is for the American people to have a full understanding of the files' contents. The declassification gives the media the right to examine the files. All FBI files will be declassified, except for a classified annex, and made public. The FBI and Department of Justice should be ashamed, as should Biden.

A presidential memorandum requires immediate declassification of all FBI files related to the Crossfire Hurricane investigation, which is considered an instance of weaponization of law enforcement. The aim is to give the American people a full understanding of the files. The declassification gives the media the right to examine the files. All will be declassified except for a classified annex. The speaker suggests the FBI and Department of Justice should be ashamed, as should Biden.

I want to share with the people of Rhode Island what this investigation looks like, where we are today, and where we anticipate it moving forward. Last night, there were dozens of Providence police officers working in the command post to develop leads in this difficult case, both because of the campus tragedy and the challenge of developing evidence. Our prosecutors—six in total—were there, and our victim services folks were at the hospital. This is what these investigations look like: sometimes you head in one direction, then you regroup and go in another. That has happened over the last 24 hours or so. Collectively, the team developed leads in multiple areas. One lead was chased to ground, leading to the detainment of a person of interest. Those words reflect that there was some degree of evidence pointing to this individual, but that evidence needed to be corroborated and confirmed. Over the last 24 hours, leading into very recently, that evidence now points in a different direction. This means that this person of interest needs to be and should be released. It is unfortunate that this person’s name was leaked to the public, and it’s hard to put that back in the bottle. We will proceed very carefully here, because there is too much at stake for the victims of this horrific crime and their families to take chances with respect to this investigation. Going forward, our team of prosecutors will be working with the Providence Police Department as the principal leads in this investigation. Our resources will be amplified by the state police, the FBI, the ATF, the DEA, the Marshal Service, and others as we develop leads and move toward justice in this case. This could happen very quickly, but it could also take some time.

Your investigation uncovered witnesses who told you that or told your team that CIA Director John Brennan overruled intelligence officials who were objecting to the inclusion of the Steele dossier in the intelligence community assessment. How well would some of those witnesses hold up in court or in a public hearing of the House Oversight Committee? Well, these are some of the most senior intelligence officials within the CIA who came forward and spoke the truth to the House Intelligence Committee's, majority staff team that launched this investigation. They invest they they spoke to and interviewed over 20 intelligence community professionals, senior officials within the CIA, which is how they uncovered the truth of what actually happened as reported in the documents that we released yesterday.

When people talk about the deep state, in a sense, this is the commanding control of a major part of the deep state. No. It is the commanding control of the deep state. Congress said, we want comprehensive oversight on both operations in Afghanistan and Iraq and we want a plan for oversight and we're going to delegate this directly to the chair of the SIGI. I see. So you really worked for the chair of the SIGI. Well, this is the interesting piece. He in turn delegates it down to the IG at the DOD. Yeah. And I'm working for him. Yeah. So, you're working directly for the inspector general at DOD. But for the SIGI actually. But in effect You really were working for the SIGI. You bet. And who at the SIGI? Michael E Horowitz. Wow. Horowitz? Yes. One of the worst. Yes. One of the absolute worst. Horowitz of Russia collusion fame. Yes. Who now is at is not out of the government, who now is at the Federal Reserve. Right. Maybe. Ready to come back. Right. Still probably providing emeritus status on the SIGI. What was his position officially at the He was the DOJ IG. He was the inspector general at DOJ. And he replaced Glenn Fine who went to DOD. Wow. It's a really nice tightrope. And his deputy then went on to become the DODIG. And his deputy was spent thirty years over in The US Attorney's Office District Of Columbia. They really have it all sewn up, don't they? The assistant FBI director for integrity and ethics were for Glenn Fine and runs the DO runs the FBI. Yes. Think of the Siggy as an integrated command and control center. So, the buck stops with them. Yes. Because every complaint that is made. In any agency whatsoever goes to the Inspector General, and from those IGs report to the SIGI and it dies. And are investigated by the SIGI. And are investigated by the SIGI and it all dies. That's whistleblower complaints actually go to die. If it's against the members of the SIGI. Unless it's in their interest to prosecute it. Politically, yes. So, when people talk about the deep state, in a sense, this is the command and control of a major part of the deep state. No. It is the command and control of the deep state. It's in every bureau, every board, every agency, and every commission. One person, 2,300,000 people in the executive branch. I only need about 40 people to run the whole show. As long as you ensure that no one can foil my records, as long as everything I do is law enforcement sensitive, and as long as anybody that is a whistleblower can get collective punishment. Which is what you have seen with over 700 documented cases of people who've been Retaliated against. We see it every day. We see it every day.

The transcript centers on Amjed Fassisi, a CIA contractor who works with Deloitte and, at times, within the CIA’s China Mission Center on cyber operations. He describes a career path that includes time at the CIA starting in 2008, a stint at the NSA for two years, then a return to the CIA in 2011, where he managed about 80 cybersecurity practitioners and later helped stand up a threat program inside the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Fassisi asserts that he holds a high-level clearance (top secret/SCIs) and that his role involves cross-agency work across the enterprise, though he does not disclose specific details. Key, repeated claims attributed to Fassisi: - The higher-ups in the intelligence community, including CIA directors Gina Haspel and Mike Pompeo, and the upper echelons of their staffs, colluded to withhold information from sitting President Donald Trump. Fassisi states, “We kept information from him,” and later explains “the executive staff” (the director and subordinates) were involved. - Fassisi contends that the CIA and other agencies monitored Trump and his inner circle, using human sources and surveillance. He mentions that Trump could be targeted or spied on, including claims that he would “call Vladimir Putin and tell him” secrets, and that “the intelligence agencies thought that president Trump was a, quote, fucking dumbass and would disclose information.” - He asserts that information about Trump’s activities was intentionally withheld from him by the intelligence community, and that this withholding involved high-level officials who would not share details with the president. - Fassisi suggests that the intelligence community engaged in surveillance of Trump and his team using methods such as human intelligence rather than only wiretaps, and that the FBI, NSA, and other agencies were involved, with implications that FISA-related processes were used to monitor Trump. - He asserts distrust and lack of information-sharing among agencies, stating “the NSA and CIA don’t share information” and describing internal fragmentation and territoriality between agencies as a problem. - Fassisi alleges that there was a broader pattern of weaponizing the CIA and collaborating with foreign partners to influence or monitor Trump associates, referencing the broader narrative around Trump and Russia and implying ongoing monitoring of Trump’s activities post-presidency as well. - He makes broad allegations about Israel and other allies, asserting distrust and claiming Israel “steals intelligence” from the U.S.; he frames relations with allies as fraught and unreliable. - Fassisi describes the reporting by Michael Schellenberger and Matt Taibbi as validated by his claims, and positions the ongoing investigation as exposing corruption within the CIA, FBI, and Department of Justice, with a narrative that information was hidden from the public and from Trump. Supporting context around the interview: - The exchange includes tense moments where Fassisi is shown a CIA badge and discusses his role; the interviewer questions the plausibility and provenance of his claims, pressing for documentation or proof, while Fassisi provides limited responses about his clearance, division (China Mission Center), and contractor status. - The segment also includes editorial framing by the presenter, interjecting with external commentary and promotional content not directly related to Fassisi’s assertions. The interviewer promises follow-up coverage and frames Fassisi’s statements as part of a broader whistleblower narrative. - Throughout, the content repeatedly emphasizes claims of withheld information from Trump, surveillance of Trump and his associates, inter-agency distrust, and internal CIA culture, without providing verifiable documentation within the interview itself.

I've never completely understood the term "deep state". What I can tell you is that the FBI has 37,000 men and women working in field offices all over the country and in LIGAD offices all over the world. These are people of character, of courage, of principle, of selflessness, and of patriotism. That's the FBI that I see. I appreciate that, and I hope the president stops attacking the FBI.

Director Brennan, director Clapper, director Panetta, and director Morrell were involved in signing a statement. The speaker mentioned that they would have informed the director or deputy director by providing them with a copy of the statement, as per their usual process.

Work for the department of justice. Been there, like, twenty three years. I'm an analyst. I'll be acting deputy chief of our office for a few months starting next week. I work closely with all the federal law enforcement agencies and the US attorney's offices As a gospel. The prosecutors and stuff. The thing is it's what you're saying because I do deal with so many of the agencies, like the Bureau of Brisons, the Marshal Service, the FBI, US attorney's offices. It's like

The speaker describes a multi-layered hierarchy within the FBI involved in every investigative decision. Above the speaker are assistant directors, executive assistant directors, deputy directors, and the director of the FBI. Below the speaker are section chiefs, supervisors, unit chiefs, case agents, and analysts. The speaker asserts that all of these individuals were involved in all decisions.

Moving forward with Kash Patel's nomination as FBI director will likely provoke significant backlash. Many believe he seeks to disrupt the institution, but he is profoundly unqualified for the role. His experience in federal government is limited to three years as a line attorney at DOJ headquarters, with no leadership or management experience. The idea of him leading an organization of 37,000 people, with operations across 400 locations and sensitive global roles, is unrealistic. It’s hard to imagine him commanding respect in a room full of police chiefs and sheriffs.

After a 4-year investigation, the justice department released a 300-page report on the FBI's failures. Members of Congress will bring in John Durham to review the findings. The investigation confirms what we already knew from a previous inspector general report: the FBI did not uphold their duty to follow the law in certain events and activities related to the crossfire hurricane and intelligence operations.

The speaker states that the FBI works directly with the ADL daily and that the FBI's work fighting antisemitism depends on the ADL protecting the community. The speaker expresses deep appreciation for FBI Director Wray and all FBI professionals for their work.

Deputy director Andrew McCabe and deputy assistant director Peter Strzok initiated the Crossfire Hurricane investigation without speaking to the sources of the information. The report by Durham suggests that the FBI showed favoritism towards the 2016 Hillary Clinton campaign compared to the Trump campaign. The FBI's handling of the investigation departed from their usual approach and was based on raw and unverified intelligence. It is important to note that these events took place during James Comey's tenure as FBI director. The FBI has since implemented reforms to prevent similar missteps.

The FBI allegedly maintains a list of over 5,000 employees involved in the January 6 investigation, though US Attorneys are reportedly not included. Some individuals are purportedly being treated poorly for performing their assigned duties related to the investigation. These duties involved investigating facts and applying them to legal standards as guided by prosecutors. This work is described as non-political.

I had a successful career in the FBI, overseeing operations in Southern California with a large team and budget. However, I believe that the organization has been infiltrated by the Illuminati Movement, along with other agencies like the NSA and CIA. I will provide more information on this later.

There were multiple layers of people above me at every investigative decision, including the assistant director, executive assistant director, deputy director, and director of the FBI. There were also multiple layers of people below me, such as section chiefs, supervisors, unit chiefs, case agents, and analysts. All of these individuals were involved in all of these decisions.

The Trump administration has executed a significant purge at the FBI, dismissing all six senior executives and multiple heads of field offices. This includes the leader of the Washington DC office, which was involved in prosecuting Trump, and several federal prosecutors linked to the January 6 investigations. These officials are career law enforcement professionals, not political appointees, and their removal could severely impact the FBI's ability to address terrorism and crime nationwide. Additionally, the acting deputy attorney general has requested a list of FBI employees involved in January 6 cases, affecting personnel across various field offices. This upheaval leaves local offices in disarray and raises concerns about the future of federal law enforcement.

Moving forward with Kash Patel's nomination as FBI director will likely provoke significant backlash. His qualifications for the role are questionable; he lacks the experience necessary to lead an organization of this magnitude. Patel has only three years of experience as a line attorney at the DOJ and has never managed or led any organization. The notion of him representing the FBI, which oversees 37,000 employees and works closely with the intelligence community, is unrealistic. It's hard to imagine him commanding respect in a room full of police chiefs and sheriffs.

Multiple agencies within the intelligence community collaborate with social media platforms to address and remove inauthentic content. These agencies work tirelessly to collect intelligence and provide real-time information to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The FBI and DHS take appropriate action by working with social media companies to remove such content.

FBI agents and analysts, who handle investigations and surveillance, are not influenced by political changes and are dedicated to their work. Most intend to stay for their entire careers, often facing potential termination or retribution for doing their jobs on significant national security cases. This situation has created a sense of fear and uncertainty among them, as losing their jobs would jeopardize their reputations, financial stability, pensions, and health insurance. The current environment within the FBI is chaotic, with employees worried about their futures due to political maneuvering. It is unjust and unacceptable for them to endure such treatment.

The January 6 case involved a significant number of FBI personnel, with estimates suggesting that around three-fourths of the bureau had some involvement. This includes a wide range of cases, from minor misdemeanors to serious charges like seditious conspiracy and assaults on federal officers. Public sentiment generally supports prosecuting those who attacked law enforcement during the riots. The ongoing scrutiny of FBI leadership raises questions about how deeply this will affect the agency's rank and file. Each arrest requires multiple officials, and many individuals contribute to the paperwork and analysis related to these cases.

Kash Patel is now the FBI director, a positive development. Dan Bongino will be the deputy director, assisting Patel. Bongino has highlighted abuses of the deep state and the FBI and has a storied law enforcement career, making him a near-perfect fit. He will run the FBI's day-to-day operations under Patel. The question is whether Patel can save the FBI, which has been corrupted. The FBI raided President Trump's home and gave the speaker a subpoena, which they claim is abusive. The FBI has been targeting the opposition to the deep state and the democratic left machine, subverting the rule of law and the constitutional republic. The issue is whether the FBI can be relied upon to uphold the rule of law and advance the public interest.