reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In district 10 of Allegheny County, there was a significant difference in the absentee vote ratio between Biden and Trump, with Biden receiving 17 votes for every 1 vote for Trump. Some precincts in this district even recorded 0 votes for Trump and hundreds for Biden. This is unusual considering that the county as a whole had a ratio of 4 Biden votes for every 1 Trump vote. Additionally, other districts in Allegheny voted 78% for Biden on average, while district 10 voted a staggering 93% for Biden. These anomalies resulted in over 23,000 votes for Biden and only 1300 for Trump. There were also strange patterns in the vote accumulation for both candidates, with Trump's totals increasing and then decreasing by significant amounts. The election officials have not provided explanations for these irregularities.

Between 9:11 PM and 9:32 PM on CNN, there were significant vote swings in the election. Joe Biden started with 706,000 votes and dropped to 300,000, while Trump went from 371,000 to 292,000. Biden then increased to 871,000, while Trump had a sudden increase to 413,000 before dropping again. These fluctuations raise questions about how votes can decrease and why there were so many errors. The video highlights a 19,000 vote switch in Pennsylvania and questions the number of errors across the country and who is responsible for them.

The speaker claims that a sudden increase of 138,000 votes for Biden is statistically improbable due to its linear movement and the absence of any votes for Trump. They argue that in any location with that many voters, at least some votes would be expected for the opposing candidate. The speaker suggests this anomaly occurred around 4:30 AM, followed by another at 6:23 AM. They also find it inexplicable that Nevada suddenly stopped counting votes in the middle of the day, contrary to typical election procedures.

The speaker claims that real-time Edison data reveals election data manipulation. According to the speaker, Seidl receives raw election data directly from election officials in at least nine states. The speaker alleges that an additive process should show more votes, not deletions, in each interval report. However, a video of Edison reports allegedly shows pauses, oscillation, and deletions in total, in-person, and mail-in votes. The speaker claims this is the algorithm trying to figure out the math problem. The speaker points to North Carolina and Georgia counties as examples, noting Seidl directly contracts with Georgia. The speaker then plays a clip of someone discussing estimated vote percentages dropping, suggesting the reported results are not actual results. The speaker questions the calling of races with razor-thin margins, particularly Arizona, based on projections and alleged impossible data anomalies. The speaker asserts that historically, those counting votes called races, but now machines and news outlets do, deterring challenges.

The speaker discusses irregularities in the voting data in Esther County and Lehigh County. In Esther County, there are decreases in both absentee and election day votes, which is unusual. Trump loses a significant number of votes in both categories. In Lehigh County, Trump initially receives over 66,000 votes, but they are then taken away and he receives incremental updates to reach that number again. The speaker questions why the updates are not equal to the votes that were removed and what is causing these discrepancies.

The speaker questions the statistical possibility of a sudden increase in votes for Biden without any votes for Trump. They argue that even in the bluest city, there should be some votes for the other party. They also mention that the increase in votes occurred around 4:30 in the morning. The speaker then discusses the sudden halt in vote counting in Nevada, which they find inexplicable and illogical. They question why counting would be stopped in the middle of the day and suggest that it doesn't make sense to shut everyone down.

Joe Biden's vote count seems implausible, as he supposedly received 15 million more votes than Barack Obama, yet we didn't gain net House seats after losing the presidency. We also lost 19 out of 20 bellwether races. There are claims of fraudulent ballots from non-existent voters, which raises questions about the integrity of the election process. Trump announced his lead in Philadelphia late at night, but counting was allegedly stopped, only to resume early the next morning, resulting in a shift in the vote count. This situation has led to suspicions about the counting process and transparency during the election.

In this video, the speakers discuss an example of vote switching in Georgia during the election. They explain that there was a clear switch of vote totals between Donald Trump and Joe Biden in Bibb County. They mention that this type of switch can go undetected in state reporting if it falls between state updates. The speakers then analyze the underlying data and identify deductions in votes for Trump in Pennsylvania. They emphasize that these deductions should not occur in an election. By closely analyzing the data sources, they aim to understand what really happened in November 2020.

The speaker discusses a discrepancy in the vote count between Biden and Trump, stating that the actual results showed Trump with a significant lead. They explain that the voting machine is designed to generate errors, which then go to adjudication where thousands of ballots can be bulk adjudicated with one click. A high rate of 68% of the ballots needed adjudication, compared to the federal allowable rate of 1 in 125,000. The program is intentionally designed to generate errors and move votes from one candidate to another. However, on November 4, all system files, adjudication files, and internet files were deleted, which is significant.

The speaker discusses an incident where there were errors in the vote count for Biden and Trump. They explain that the voting machine generated a high number of errors, which were then sent for adjudication. The rate of ballots needing adjudication was 68%, much higher than the federal allowable rate of 1 in 125,000. The speaker suggests that this program is designed to generate errors and manipulate votes. They also mention that on November 4th, all system files related to adjudication were deleted. This is seen as a significant issue.

The video highlights instances of vote manipulation in the election database, specifically focusing on Donald Trump's votes. It reveals that votes for Trump were switched and removed from his total, making it appear as if there were no changes. In three counties, over 30,000 votes for Trump disappeared. The video provides a clear example of this manipulation, where Trump's votes were switched with Biden's in a matter of minutes. This type of manipulation can go undetected in state reporting due to the time lag between each state update.

In the exchange, concerns are raised about mail-in ballots in Allegheny and Philadelphia counties and how they were counted. Speaker 0 notes that ballots were counted without observers, citing 682,770 ballots observed and asking about the 1,823,148 mailed-out ballots, contrasted with a final count showing 2,589,242 mail-in ballots. The core question is: what explains the roughly 700,000 mail-in ballots that “appeared from nowhere”? Speaker 1 responds that their cyber team uses white-hat hacking techniques to gather publicly available information from the secretary of state’s website, which has been updated as late as 11:16 this morning with provisional and mail-in ballots, though those numbers continue to change. He adds that the 2,500,000 figure is no longer on the website, and it has “just been taken off.” There is no annotation explaining why. Speaker 2 then describes an on-the-ground observation: a deputy sheriff, a senior law enforcement officer, was seen not being observed and walking in with baggies, with USBs being inserted into machines. The witness claims to have personally witnessed this 24 times, with additional witnesses including Democrat poll watchers. They were told by an attorney that every election leaves a couple of USB cards in the voting machines to be brought back by the warehouse manager, but this account is contradicted by law enforcement and other officials. The witness states that 47 USB cards are missing and “they’re nowhere to be found,” and that 32 to 30 cards uploaded were not present in the live vote update. The witness demanded timely live upload of vote results, which showed 50,000 votes; they assert those votes were for Vice President Biden, though they note that identifying who those votes were for should not matter to a computer scientist. Speaker 1 emphasizes that forensic evidence from the computers was not obtained: the procedure would involve turning off the computer, imaging the drive with BitLocker, under law enforcement observation, which would take about an hour for five machines. This forensic imaging was never performed, despite objections three weeks earlier. They later learned that virtually all chain-of-custody logs, yellow sheets, and forensic records in Delaware County were gone; a signing party attempted to recreate the logs with poll workers but was unsuccessful in recovering them all. The discussion concludes with a claim that there are 100,000 to 120,000 ballots, both mail-in and USB, in question, and that there is no remedy or “cure” within the local charter for certifying a presidential vote, leaving the speaker asserting that nobody could certify the vote in good conscience.

There were 138,000 votes that came in all at once, and they all went to Biden, which is statistically improbable. In any election, even in the most Democratic areas, you'd expect some votes for the opposing candidate. This situation raises concerns about the counting process, especially since it appears this spike occurred around 4:30 AM. Additionally, Nevada has unexpectedly stopped counting votes during the day, which is illogical and raises further questions about the transparency of the process. It’s unusual for counting to halt when there should still be workers tallying votes.

During the election night, there were significant vote swings observed on CNN between Joe Biden and Trump. Biden's votes fluctuated drastically, raising questions about the accuracy of the counting process. The speaker questions the legitimacy of such errors and the impact they may have had on the election results nationwide. The concern is raised about the responsibility for these errors and the potential impact on the outcome.

Unobserved ballots in Allegheny County and Philadelphia raised questions about 700,000 mail-in ballots. A cyber team used public data from the Secretary of State's website, which was updated regularly. The 2.5 million ballot count post-election is now missing from the site without explanation.

On November 9th, there was a mysterious occurrence where 25,000 ballots went missing in the reported count. The next day, on November 10th, these ballots magically appeared, affecting the outcome of the race. This doesn't make sense and is completely wrong. The law exists to safeguard the integrity of the vote.

Between 9:11 PM and 9:32 PM on CNN, there were significant vote swings during the election. Joe Biden's votes dropped from 706,000 to 517,000, then increased to 871,000 and dropped again to 495,000. Meanwhile, Trump's votes went from 371,000 to 413,000 and then down to 292,000. The speaker questions how votes can decrease when they should only be added. They highlight the possibility of errors, mentioning a 19,000 vote switch in Pennsylvania and questioning the number of errors nationwide and who is accountable for them.

Joe Biden could not have received more votes than Barack Obama, and it’s improbable that we lost the presidency while gaining 12 House seats. We didn’t win 19 out of 20 bellwether races and still lose. There were fraudulent ballots created for non-existent voters, which is why envelopes were discarded. Trump announced he was leading by 800,000 votes in Philadelphia, insisting they wouldn’t be blocked from counting. There was confusion when it was suggested counting would stop for the night, but when counting resumed the next morning, the results changed, indicating a shift in the outcome.

This video highlights statistical irregularities and vote manipulation within the election database. It focuses on the example of Dodge County, where there were strange occurrences in the vote counts. Specifically, votes for Donald Trump were being switched and removed from his total, often coinciding with other updates to make it appear neutral. Across three counties, Trump lost over 30,000 votes. The video provides a clear example of vote count switching at the county level, where Trump's votes were swapped with Biden's. This type of manipulation can go undetected in state reporting if it falls between state refreshes.

The speaker discusses the statistical improbability of a sudden surge of 138,000 votes all going to Biden without any representation for Trump. They question the legitimacy of this occurrence and the linear movement of the votes. They also mention that Nevada has suddenly stopped counting, which is inexplicable and raises suspicions. The speaker expresses confusion and disbelief at the decision to halt the counting process. The conversation then shifts to new information from Wisconsin, where Biden is now ahead by 11,381 votes. The speaker raises questions about the source of these votes and what it means for the overall situation.

There were significant vote swings on election night between 9:11 PM and 9:32 PM. Joe Biden's votes fluctuated dramatically, dropping from 700,000 to 517,000, then rising to 871,000, while Trump's votes increased from 371,000 to 413,000 before plummeting to 292,000. This raises questions about how votes can decrease when they should only increase. While human and machine errors can occur, the scale of these discrepancies—like a 300,000 vote swing—seems excessive. In Pennsylvania, a 19,000 vote switch was noted, but many similar instances across the country prompt concerns about the integrity of the election process. How many errors are acceptable, and who is responsible for these discrepancies?

The speaker discusses how the vote total may have been altered through the HAMMER program and ScoreCard software, affecting the election outcome. They mention a computer glitch in Michigan that favored President Trump, suggesting similar issues in other states. They question the sudden appearance of thousands of ballots for Biden, deeming it statistically improbable.

Examples of statistical irregularities in election data reveal vote manipulation, particularly in Dodge County. Incremental vote counts for Donald Trump show discrepancies, with some votes appearing to switch or disappear. Notably, over 30,000 of Trump's votes vanished across Dodge, Daughtry, and Putnam counties. A specific instance in Bibb County, Georgia, illustrates this: Trump had 29,391 votes at one point, while Biden had 17,218. Shortly after, Trump's votes dropped to 17,218, and Biden's rose to 29,391, indicating a direct switch. Such manipulations can go unnoticed due to the time lag in state reporting, allowing discrepancies to appear neutral to observers.

In district 10 of Allegheny County, the absentee vote ratio between Biden and Trump was 17 to 1, with some precincts showing zero votes for Trump and hundreds for Biden. This is significant because the county as a whole had a ratio of 4 to 1 in favor of Biden. In addition, other districts in Allegheny voted 78% for Biden on average, while district 10 voted a staggering 93% for Biden. This resulted in over 23,000 votes for Biden and only 1,300 for Trump. These numbers are statistically unlikely and raise questions about the data. Furthermore, there were anomalies in both absentee and election day votes, with Trump's totals increasing and then decreasing by over 27,000 votes. The reason for these irregularities and the lack of explanation from officials is concerning.

Speaker 0 presents a video focused on data and evidence of alleged irregularities in the 2020 election, asserting that there has been no comprehensive place to see widespread fraud until now. He states the video is “pure data” and invites viewers to consider the statistical anomalies in three states (Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia) in the early hours of 11/04/2020, when Biden received major vote spikes after trailing Trump. - He analyzes 8,954 individual vote updates and identifies a clear statistical pattern across nearly all updates, with four notably aberrant updates: two in Michigan, one in Wisconsin, and one in Georgia, all occurring in the same five-hour window in the middle of the night when counting reportedly stopped in some places. - In Michigan, a 06:30AM update shows Biden at 141,258 votes to Trump’s 5,968, described as the most extreme update in all datasets across all states, followed by a noticeable ratio change in nearby updates. In Wisconsin, a single update allegedly moved Biden from trailing by over 100,000 votes into the lead. In Georgia, a 01:34AM Eastern Time update shows Biden at 136,155 to Trump’s 29,115. They claim these four spikes exceed the states’ margins of victory, making the spikes not only abnormal by percentage but also by magnitude. They conclude that if these four unlikely updates had not happened, the presidency could have been different. - Detractors are cited as arguing human error, but the video questions where evidence of corrections is, and notes that California shows only one anomalous update in percentage, not enough magnitude to shift outcomes. - A “consistently identical ratio of Biden to Trump votes across time” is highlighted as allegedly impossible, with a Florida example showing 100 identical ratios over several days. The video asserts a computer algorithm is involved, termed a weighted race distribution, associated with Diebold voting machines (known as early as 2001), implying values rather than simple counts. - In California, a single update is shown with Biden receiving about 65% and Trump 32% for one vote, raising questions about how one vote could go to more than one candidate. Speaker 0 then links these patterns to alleged connections between Diebold and Dominion Voting Systems, claiming Dominion acquired ESNS in 2010, which had previously acquired Diebold, and that Dominion’s software is licensed from Smartmatic. They also note that forensic audits show errors and that the mainstream narrative claims these issues are misinformation. They reference NBC News and PBS findings on how easy it is to hack voting machines or cast fake votes. Next, Speaker 0 notes eyewitness and video evidence from Georgia: poll worker Ruby allegedly was filmed in the backroom with absentee ballots, and at 10:30PM on November 3, media and poll watchers were told to leave, yet Ruby and others remained, pulling ballots from under a table and distributing them to counting stations. They describe Ruby running the same stack of ballots to the machine three times, observing a large Biden surge after 01:34AM Georgia time, and question whether a ballot can be counted more than once, citing Coffey County, Georgia as an example of someone claiming to scan the same batches repeatedly. Speaker 0 references Raquel Rodriguez, arrested for election fraud in Texas over video evidence of ballot harvesting, and asserts that cybersecurity evidence indicates Dominion and Edison Research used an unencrypted VPN with easily accessible credentials allowing foreign access, asserting that China, Iran, and other countries accessed the servers, contradicting claims that Dominion machines were not connected to the Internet. They mention Dominion’s association with a Chinese-registered domain, and board members with Chinese nationality, alleging conflicts of interest through corporate ownership and licensing from Smartmatic. Speaker 0 highlights that Antrim County, Michigan audits found high error and adjudication rates in Dominion, with an 68 o 5% error rate far above federal guidelines, missing logs for 2020, and reprogramming of election event designer cards during the safe harbor period. They point to subpoenas and the lack of access to logs, and to affidavits from poll workers claiming illegal activities, non-equal treatment of observers, counting without proper oversight, shredding ballots, and other irregularities. Speaker 7 concludes with a claim that many Americans distrust the 2020 election and urges viewers to download and share the video, demand election reform, and notes that the video’s credits will continue with data readers, while warning of erasure or fact checks by tech platforms.