reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The discussion centers on whether school policy penalizes students for misusing pronouns and whether such penalties amount to harassment or suspension. The first speaker raises the core question: “For clarification, is this the policy that's used if a student misuses a pronoun they are suspended? An intentional. Yeah. That's part of the definition, bullying.” They illustrate the concern with a hypothetical: if a student’s parents raise their child to respond to a female with she pronouns, but that student says “I want to be something else,” will their child be suspended for that? The implication is that misusing or resisting pronoun usage could trigger disciplinary action under the policy. The chain of reasoning then states: “Oh yeah that would be harassment.” The speaker expresses disbelief upon learning that students might be suspended “because they are using the wrong pronoun,” stating they were aghast and did not realize that such suspensions occur. The subsequent line shows a pushback from another participant: “Should be disagree with you saying that's incorrect.” This introduces a contest over whether suspending for pronoun usage is correct, but the rebuttal immediately pivots to a claim about biological facts: “Well, one is biologically facts.” The conversation asserts: “It's actually XX chromosomes, XY chromosomes. Those are facts. We can't change those. It doesn't matter what our opinion is. We can't change those things.” The speaker emphasizes that these chromosomal facts are immutable. From there, the speaker clarifies their main question: “Those are immutable facts. And I'm wondering, are we what I'm asking, my question is, are we suspending students for immutable facts? That's what I'm asking. Not for making it as genuine.” In sum, the exchange presents a concern that disciplinary actions related to pronoun use might target individuals based on disagreements about gender identity and pronouns, and it juxtaposes this with a claim about immutable biological facts (XX and XY chromosomes) as a basis for questioning whether suspensions are being applied to immutable facts rather than to conduct. The dialogue frames a tension between policy definitions of harassment and a set of assertions about biological determinism, seeking to determine whether suspensions are being imposed for immutable factual claims rather than for misbehavior.

We passed a law clarifying teachers can't be fired for not informing parents if a student identifies as trans or gay. Teachers still have the right to inform parents, especially regarding health and safety. The law protects teachers who choose not to "snitch" on students. Some believe teachers should be penalized, even terminated, for withholding information from parents. But we feel teachers shouldn't be policing student conversations. There are instances where teachers affirm a student's transition without parental knowledge. While this issue is politically charged, principles matter, even if unpopular. We both hold deeply unpopular beliefs. It's important to be aware of the Democratic Party's brand challenges on these issues.

Our job as parents is to listen and believe our children when they tell us who they are. This healthcare is life affirming and life saving.

Speaker 1 states that individuals who want a vaccine should have access to it. However, they should also be informed about the vaccine's safety profile, risk profile, and efficacy. Speaker 0 affirms this position.

A speaker visited the school for two days to ensure that staff could provide information to students about their gender. They emphasized the importance of adults guiding students in sexual education, including topics like masturbation and anal sex. The speaker mentioned a bill that was passed for children as young as five years old. The speaker acknowledged that discussing these topics might be uncomfortable for some, but believed it was necessary. They mentioned critical race theory and pointed out that the principal and mayor of the school were black.

Our children, including LGBTQ Americans, are important to our nation's future. It is crucial that we treat everyone in our country with care and respect. This administration wants to assure LGBTQ Americans, especially children, that they are loved, heard, and supported.

Gender affirmative care is deemed medically necessary, safe, and effective for transgender and non-binary individuals. Attacks on the LGBTQI+ community, particularly trans youth, are driven by an agenda unrelated to science and medicine. These politically and ideologically motivated assaults contradict the vast body of scientific evidence.

We are concerned about harmful protocols for children struggling with their biological sex. We urge US medical organizations to stop promoting social affirmation, puberty blockers, hormones, and surgeries for these children. Sex is biologically determined and should guide medical decisions. We reject the claim that our concerns are a minority opinion and demand a change in approach.

We operate within a civil rights framework in this state, which includes trans youth. The notion that there are only boys and girls is biologically inaccurate, as science shows a more complex continuum. Some children are born intersex, and others have inconsistencies between their chromosomes, hormones, and sex at birth. Regardless, state laws are clear: students can identify and participate in activities based on their identified gender. We will uphold this law.

Most trans kids know they're trans between ages two and seven, with the speaker's daughter knowing around two and a half. The speaker emphasizes that children know things that adults don't, and these are the things to which adults should listen. The speaker states their child is not mentally ill. To begin gender affirming care, the speaker had to consult with numerous healthcare professionals.

The speaker addresses a politician about the government's draft guidance on gender identity in schools, which includes a ban on teaching the concept of gender identity. The politician states the guidance is under consultation and clarity is needed for schools to manage this sensitive area. A Labour government would ensure guidance is provided, prioritizing children's well-being and avoiding political exploitation of the issue. While some elements of the draft guidance are acceptable, others are too partisan. The politician would review consultation responses, work with parents, young people, and professionals to address outstanding issues, and avoid ministerial disputes. The politician affirms the existence and right to recognition of trans people, especially vulnerable ones needing support. Clear guidance is needed for schools to support children experiencing distress around their well-being, and a responsible, serious approach is necessary.

Do you think that gender ideology should be taught to students in schools? No. The speaker mentions a partner who 'works for the feds' and fostered two kids, calling him a great dad. They asked themselves, 'if we had kids, would we be doing this, telling our kids about this stuff? Would we want them top that in school?' and decided against it, arguing that kids will learn anyway. He says, If I were a parent, I would not be teaching my children about transitioning. He wants kids to learn math, English, science, arithmetic, and to play soccer with neighbors. They'll learn that there's double daddy homes and double mommy homes. He is pro-family and wants the country to have a future, calling it the greatest country ever and opposing revamping systems that haven't worked elsewhere.

Parents have always affirmed their children, especially when their gender and identity expression aligns with their biological gender. However, when this doesn't happen, affirmation tends to decrease. This is the issue at hand with the TGI bill, which doesn't mention transgender and gender non-conforming individuals explicitly. Instead, it focuses on the child's gender identity and expression, as well as the parents' duty to affirm their children.

Parents have always affirmed their children, usually when their gender identity aligns with their biological gender. However, when this is not the case, affirmation tends to diminish. This is the issue at hand with the TGI bill, which does not mention transgender and gender non-conforming individuals explicitly. Instead, it focuses on a child's gender identity and expression, as well as the parents' duty to affirm their children.

Because let's be clear. This is life affirming and life saving health care. When our children tell us who they are, it is our job as grown ups to listen and to believe them. That's what it means to be a good parent. Because let's be clear. This is life affirming and life saving health care. When our children tell us who they are, it is our job as grown ups to listen and to believe them. That's what it means to be a good parent. Because let's be clear. This is life affirming and life saving health care. When our children tell us who they are, it is our job as grown ups to listen and to believe them. That's what it means to be a good parent.

Speaker 0 believes that children should be allowed to explore their own sexuality with their peers, but also acknowledges the role of adults in society. Speaker 1 states that their organization aims to give children higher status and recognizes their right to sexual freedoms while protecting them from harm. Speaker 2 argues that an equal relationship between adults and children is not possible due to differences in maturity. Speaker 1 counters by emphasizing the importance of comprehensive sexual education for children. Speaker 2 maintains that inequality exists in such relationships due to immaturity. Speaker 1 disagrees, stating that pedophiles engage in reciprocal relationships with children and that maturity is subjective. The discussion ends with Speaker 2 questioning how a 12-year-old can make a mature judgment about sex. Speaker 1 highlights the child's ability to recognize pleasure and express consent, emphasizing the importance of a responsible and caring approach.

In California, it is important for transgender, gender nonconforming, and intersex (TGI) children to be recognized and affirmed in the judicial system. This is not just based on anecdotal evidence, but on scientific research. It is crucial to create a safe environment for these children, without leaving room for judicial discretion to deny their gender identity. As someone who has raised black sons in California, I appreciate judicial discretion, but it can sometimes be problematic because judges are human beings. Therefore, it is necessary for every judge in California to understand that affirming TGI children is in their best interest.

We need to intervene if we witness discrimination or harassment, even if it's just intimidation. For example, if a student writes on the board that there are only 2 genders, that's intimidation and harassment. Our staff needs training on how to handle these situations because most of them haven't been trained. Even those attending this gender identity training today, about 75% of them are new to this topic.

I want to assure you that your children are not being groomed for sex at school or online. This is a message from the White House, emphasizing the importance of trans rights as human rights. We want to address any concerns and reassure you that no one is coming for your kids. We also want to reach out directly to the kids and let them know that they are heard and valued. The intention behind sex education is to promote healthy understanding and positive outcomes. If you need further personal communication, please let us know.

The speaker believes that if parents support pleasure-based sex education from a young age, it would make teaching sex education in middle and high school easier. They see this as the future and the right approach. They also mention that comprehensive sex education should be integrated into every subject and that social justice education is a crucial part of it. The speaker feels that there is momentum to bring about comprehensive sex education, with the help of organizations like Amaze, and to move towards an anti-racist, pleasure-based activism.

Parents should be aware of what their children are taught about relationships in school. It is important for patients to know how hospitals discuss gender. We should not be pressured into accepting the idea that anyone can be any sex they want. Common sense tells us that a man is a man and a woman is a woman.

"Sometimes it may be just a phase of development where they're exploring their gender identity and they're kind of getting a sense of who they are, but a lot of children do end up identifying as that gender into young adulthood and adulthood." "The only real way we know for sure that they're going to continue in that gender identity is just to allow them to develop over time." "And so that's what we recommend to parents is to give them the space." "Even if parents are concerned that it's a phase, we never want to tell the child that they shouldn't be expressing their gender identity or that they should be, ashamed for the way that they're expressing their identity because that can be quite harmful." "We just want to give the child a chance to develop and explore on their own."

Protect trans kids. Protect kids.

We were instructed to use gender-neutral terms, replacing "mother" and "father" with "parent," and "brother" and "sister" with "sibling." We learned to affirm transgender children and were shown supportive videos about transgender individuals, emphasizing that rejecting or not affirming someone’s identity could be harmful. The school referred to women as AFAB individuals with vulvas and encouraged us to introduce ourselves with our pronouns and to ask others for theirs during introductions.

Speaker 0: The most intelligent, powerful species on the planet would be completely divided from the love within themselves. From the moment they are old enough to understand who they are, they are forced into a system that teaches it is wrong to be themselves if themselves differs from what is accepted as normal. They are confused about their own biological makeup so that permanently altering their body is the answer to happiness. They are required to attend an institution from age five until adulthood, where they focus only on the provided information and are repeatedly tested so that it becomes their truth. They are given an explanation to everything so they never have a chance to make their own assumptions of the world. They are scolded and humiliated if they suggest an opinion that opposes authorities. They are reminded of how cruel their ancestors were to each other in the past and the present, and only tragic events on the news are broadcast so they live in fear and think the worst of one another. They are convinced that their species used to be that of an incognizant wild animal. They are made to think their existence is incredibly random, lacking purpose, while being told they are as smart as they’ve ever been so they don’t question the integrity of the system. They are provided idols with artificial beauty and use them as examples of perfection so they are never content with their own appearance and constantly compare themselves. They are given addictive digital platforms that rank them by numbers, causing self-worth to be based on follower counts and leaving them never satisfied. A society is built where those with money benefit and those without fail. Money becomes the main focus, but it is made so difficult to accumulate that they remain in constant struggle, dedicating the majority of their time to the system that created it. They are taxed in every possible way, but told it is for their own benefit so they accept it without question. They have so much time and energy diverted through the week that two days are given to themselves to feel a reward and not fight back. They are exposed to the promotion of poison in every social setting so that even on those two days they remain disconnected from themselves and each other. Their food is pumped with excess sugars and addictive chemicals, but it is cheap, advertised, and easily accessible so they never stop consuming. When their food makes them ill, they are prescribed medication that only masks the symptoms, leading to daily dependency. They are charged so much for health care that they stay in a constant loop of consuming, medicating, and working. They experience chaos among themselves and blame it on a group of their own, forming judgmental stereotypes. They are turned against each other in so many ways.