reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Before entering politics, my net worth was $316,000. Just four years later, it jumped to $46 million. How did this happen? I bought an island vacation home on a whim and now commute via private jet from my island to Washington D.C. It appears some politicians are using insider information for stock trading, and because I'm in politics, I might have access to similar information.

Tim Cook reportedly warned Nancy Pelosi about Congress's antitrust bills. This raises questions about the influence of lobbyists and powerful CEOs making personal calls. Additionally, a Fortune.com article highlights that Pelosi's husband made a significant stock trade worth $6 million just before Congress was poised to act on big tech regulations, resulting in a profit of $5.3 million.

The conversation centers on allegations surrounding Nancy Pelosi and potential insider trading. Speaker 1 states that Nancy Pelosi should be investigated because “what she has the highest return of anybody practically in the history of Wall Street,” claiming she knows exactly what will be announced, buys stock, and then the stock goes up after the announcements. Speaker 0 notes Pelosi heard the news and ran to CNN with a busted hip, while Tapper treated her like Biden on debate night. Speaker 2 asserts that Pelosi “became rich,” and Speaker 3 is interrupted about the sixtieth anniversary of Medicaid, but wants to respond to the insider trading allegation. Speaker 2 asks Pelosi for a response to the accusation, and Speaker 3 responds that the allegation is ridiculous. Pelosi states she “very much support the stop the trading of members of congress,” clarifying that she does not think anybody is doing anything wrong, but if they are, they are prosecuted and go to jail, because “confidence instills in the American people.” Pelosi adds that she has no concern about the obvious investments that had been made over time, and that “I’m not into it. My husband is.” This points to her assertion that her husband handles the investments, not herself. The discussion continues with a provocative line about Polly P in Napa, described as a Wall Street whiz kid, and reiterates that Pelosi’s wife knows nothing about it. The segment then shifts to the broader political action in the Senate, noting that the Senate is “suiting up,” having “advanced an anti stock trading bill for congress,” while Trump is not pleased. Throughout, the dialogue juxtaposes accusations of insider trading with Pelosi’s claimed support for prohibiting trading by members of Congress, her denial of personal involvement in the investments, and the implication that her husband handles the investments. There is a consistent focus on the tension between allegations of insider trading and calls for restrictions on congressional stock activities, framed against a broader political backdrop involving Medicaid’s sixtieth anniversary and reactions from political figures such as Trump.

Introducing Samantha Power, a former USAID administrator recently dismissed from her position. Power, known for her far-left views, was sworn in on May 8, 2021. Her financial disclosure from January 2021 indicates her assets range from $6.7 million to $16.5 million, with an estimated net worth of up to $30 million by 2024. Despite earning a salary of $180,000 at USAID, her wealth has significantly increased. Now, she appears on national television discussing her contributions, raising questions about the nature of her work and the management of government funds.

Tim Cook reportedly warned Pelosi about Congress's antitrust bills. This raises questions about the influence of lobbyists and powerful CEOs making personal calls. Additionally, a Fortune.com article reveals that Speaker Pelosi's husband made a significant stock trade worth $6 million, resulting in a profit of $5.3 million just as Congress was preparing to take action against big tech.

I found something fascinating regarding Representative Ilhan Omar's net worth. Her $83 million net worth is striking, considering her annual congressional salary of $175,000. Even saving every penny over eight years would only amount to $1.2 million. I'm curious how such a significant increase in wealth occurred. While I don't know the details of her personal finances, it raises questions that warrant further investigation. It seems worth exploring how a congresswoman accumulates such substantial wealth during her time in office.

There needs to be Democrats who walk the walk and talk the talk because hypocrisy gets exploited to fuel cynicism. Insider trading in Congress is a prime example. Members of Congress sit on a committee, get information about a drug or a contract, and immediately make a call to their stockbroker, changing things so their portfolio swells. This is done on public trust, taxpayer finance, and public facilities while regulating the market they're trading on. The speaker questions why people act like money only corrupts Republicans.

Washington DC is seen as a place where anyone can become wealthy, especially if they have the right connections or last name. The Bidens are not the only ones who have profited from their political power. Congresswoman Debbie Dingell defends nepotism, saying that hard work is necessary. However, questions arise about Dingell's knowledge of healthcare stocks. She purchased $50,000 worth of Medtronic stock, and shortly after, the company received FDA approval for a new device, causing the stock to rise. Dingell's committee also granted Medtronic $27 million. It seems like Dingell may have had inside information. Attempts to contact Dingell for clarification have been unsuccessful.

Having a spouse that's good at insider trading, like Paul Pelosi, is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to how some people acquire wealth. Talking about the other methods is risky, and frankly, it's not lengthening my life expectancy to discuss this. I was supposed to go back to DC, but how am I going to survive? These people are going to kill me for sure. I actually have to be careful that I don't push too hard on the corruption stuff because it's going to get me killed.

Introducing Samantha Power, a former USAID administrator who has been dismissed from her position. Power, known for her far-left views, was sworn in on May 8, 2021. Her financial disclosure from January 2021 shows her assets ranging from $6.7 million to $16.5 million, with an estimated net worth of up to $30 million by 2024. Despite earning an annual salary of $180,000 at USAID, her wealth has significantly increased. She now appears on national TV discussing her contributions, raising questions about the nature of her work and the management of government funds.

The speaker claims corruption in the Democrat party is at an all time high. New York Governor Kathy Hochul spent $178,000 in taxpayer funds on private jet travel after signing legislation for fossil fuel companies to pay $75 billion for carbon emissions. The office of New York Attorney General Letitia James paid $483,000 to the law firm Davis Polk starting in April of last year, four months after Kathy Hochul's husband was hired by the company. James is under investigation from the DOJ for falsifying documents and claiming she legally lives at a property in Virginia for a better mortgage. Hochul then passed a new budget that includes $10 million in legal funds for James, paid for by New York taxpayers. Forensic accountant Sam Antar says a contract between the attorney general's office and Davis Polk was dormant until Hochul's husband joined the firm, after which money started flowing. After James got into trouble, she received $10 million from the state for a criminal defense. Antar believes there is something very corrupt happening and is expanding the scope of his investigation into Hochul's dealings with James.

The speaker was asked if there is evidence that Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, and Chuck Schumer have received money directly from USAID. The speaker responded that taxpayer money is sent to government organizations, then to NGOs, which are government-funded but not governed by U.S. laws. Money is sent overseas to NGOs and the speaker is confident that some of it returns to the U.S. and ends up with the aforementioned politicians. The speaker states that it's not a direct route, but that some members of Congress are strangely wealthy, accumulating millions while earning significantly less annually, which is unexplainable. The speaker says they are going to try to figure it out and stop it from happening.

Nancy Pelosi reportedly made $3 million in just three hours, which is 17 times her annual salary. She owns a $200,000 Porsche 911 and multiple properties valued over $5 million each. It would take an average person 27 years to earn that amount. This suggests that her primary motivation for being in Congress is financial gain, and she appears to excel at it.

Congresswoman Dianne Feinstein passed away recently. She owned a $5 million condo in Hawaii and a $55 million private jet. Accusations of financial crimes include benefiting her husband's companies with $100 million in government funds. Feinstein served as a congresswoman for 32 years with an annual salary of $174,000. Speculation suggests she may have used insider trading to profit from the stock market, potentially outperforming Barack Obama. To copy politicians' trades, comment "Boris" below. Translation: The congresswoman passed away, owning a condo and private jet. Accusations of financial crimes include benefiting her husband's companies. She served for 32 years with a modest salary. Speculation suggests she may have used insider trading to profit from the stock market. To copy politicians' trades, comment "Boris" below.

Speaker 0 asked Speaker 1 to respond to an accusation that Nancy Pelosi became rich through insider trading. Speaker 1 responded that the accusation is ridiculous. Speaker 1 supports stopping members of Congress from trading stocks, not because anyone is doing anything wrong, but to instill confidence in the American people. Speaker 1 has no concern about investments made over time. Speaker 1's husband is into investments, but it has nothing to do with insider information. Speaker 1 stated that the president is projecting because he has his own exposure.

The discussion centers on Ilhan Omar and questions about a sudden surge in wealth. The hosts reference Omar claiming the United States of America, and report new information from Forbes that the state of Delaware and Washington DC canceled the registrations for Omar’s husband’s investment firm, Rose Lake, for failing to pay back taxes—over $400,000 in Delaware and nearly $1,800 in DC. Omar has claimed the couple’s wealth rose to $25,000,000 from less than a grand a year prior. The hosts note the firm is supposedly worth an estimated $75,000,000 to $150,000,000, calling the situation “weird.” Steve Forbes responds, calling the situation “crooked” and arguing for an investigation into Omar and her husband’s finances, noting that the Biden administration had previously examined their finances but the inquiry “went nowhere.” Forbes questions how the couple, who reportedly had under a thousand dollars in net worth and little for Omar and her husband, could become multimillionaires. He raises the possibility of money laundering and asks where the winery in California fits in, suggesting the wine venture has a “sketchy background.” Omar is described as blaming others and engaging in race-baiting, though no public evidence of a winery exists. The winery is said to be valued at $5,000,000. Forbes notes Omar’s husband’s investment firm appears to have a DC headquarters sharing office space at a WeWork, with no visible track record of asset management, M&A deals, clients, or investment deals, and no SEC registrations for investment advisers. Forbes emphasizes the lack of verifiable activity and questions what is going on with the winery and the investment firm. The discussion suggests the investment firm may be largely a name or shell, and the WeWork office is highlighted as a potential red flag. The hosts anticipate that the $30,000,000 figure could originate from illegal sources, predicting that the wealth increase will be traced to illicit origins. The segment concludes with Steve Forbes assisting in breaking down the story, with plans to stay on the coverage.

Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Lindsey Graham, Mitch McConnell, Mitt Romney, and Joe Manchin are all wealthy politicians with high monthly incomes. Pelosi is worth $135 million with a $1 million monthly income, while McConnell is worth $150 million with a $900,000 monthly income. Schumer has a net worth of $69 million and earns $400,000 per month. Graham is worth $150 million and earns $1 million monthly. Romney's net worth is $450 million, and he earns $6 million per month. Lastly, Manchin is worth $12 million and earns $620,000 monthly. The speaker highlights the stark contrast between their wealth and the struggles faced by ordinary families.

We've uncovered some unusual financial discrepancies. Several bureaucrats with modest salaries have amassed tens of millions of dollars in net worth during their employment. One example involves a woman who walked away with approximately $30,000,000. This is particularly notable in USAID. We're investigating the source of this wealth. Perhaps they are skilled investors, but it seems more likely that this wealth accumulation is occurring at the expense of the organization. We're looking into it and trying to determine where this money originated.

The speaker was asked if there is evidence that Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, and Chuck Schumer have received money directly from USAID. The speaker responded that taxpayer money is sent to government organizations, then to NGOs, which are government-funded but not governed by U.S. laws. Money is sent overseas to NGOs and the speaker is confident that some of it returns to the U.S. and ends up with the aforementioned politicians. The speaker states that it's not a direct route, but that some members of Congress are strangely wealthy, accumulating millions while earning salaries of only around $200,000 per year. The speaker says they are going to try to figure it out and stop it from happening.

The reason that this idea to put a ban on stock trading for members of congress is even a thing is because of Nancy Pelosi. She is is is rightfully criticized because she makes, think, a $174,000 a year, yet she has a net worth of approximately 413,000,000. In 2024, Nancy Pelosi's stock portfolio, this was a fascinating statistic to me, grew 70% in one year in 2024. And her portfolio outperformed every single large hedge fund in that same year and even more than doubled the returns of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway. As for the mechanics of the legislation and how it will move forward, the White House continues to be in discussions with our friends on Capitol Hill.

There are members of Congress who have become strangely wealthy, accumulating, for example, $20 million while earning $200,000 a year. It is unclear how this is possible. The goal is to figure out how this happens and stop it.

The speaker analyzes Ilhan Omar’s official financial disclosures and advances a narrative that Est Crew LLC (referred to as Est Crew Winery), a Santa Rosa, California winery linked to Omar, is fraudulent and morally problematic. They first cite the 2023 congressional financial disclosure showing Est Crew Winery valued at $15,000, with Omar hardly earning income from it. They then cite the 2024 filing showing the same company valued at $5,000,000, claiming Omar’s income is now sufficient to pay rent and labeling the growth as “incredible” and suspect. The speaker then examines the winery’s public presence to support the claim it is real. They reference Estrero’s social media pages (Facebook and Instagram) with last posts in 2023 and no presence on X (Twitter), suggesting a lack of ongoing activity. They check the official website, which describes Est Crew as “winemakers and memory curators” with a brand portfolio led by unnamed individuals, but note there are no apparent wine sales or activities listed. They visit Google Street View of the winery location and report an empty parking lot, arguing the business is not operational or properly named. Attempts to contact the winery are described: calling the phone number on the webpage results in a busy signal after multiple tries. The speaker then asserts the winery is fake, citing a New York Post claim that Ilhan Omar’s wealth “skyrocketed” from being “one of the poorest members of Congress” to “one of the richest,” with amounts suggesting the winery is fraudulent. They state a lawsuit accusing Tim Minette, Omar’s “third husband, no relation,” of swindling investors and defrauding them, with a connection noted to Keith Ellison (Minnesota’s attorney general who “used to work for him”) and a suggestion that Ellison has not investigated Somali fraud. The speaker concludes that the winery “is not worth $5,000,000” and “doesn’t even exist,” describing the company as fraudulent and demanding investigation. They label the entire enterprise as a lie, though state that it is not a lie for Omar in terms of her financial disclosures, which allegedly list substantial income and net worth tied to this fake winery. The closing phrase refers to the claim that the winery is “the devil’s lie.”

Nancy Pelosi reportedly made $3 million in just three hours, which is 17 times her annual salary. She owns a $200,000 Porsche 911 and multiple properties valued at over $5 million each. It would take an average person 27 years to earn that amount. Critics argue that her motivations for being in Congress are primarily financial, and she has been successful in accumulating wealth.

Nancy Pelosi should be investigated for allegedly having the highest investment returns in Wall Street history, save a few individuals. This is purportedly due to her access to inside information about upcoming announcements. She allegedly buys stock before these announcements, leading to a subsequent increase in the stock's value.

It seems odd that many people in the bureaucracy with salaries of a few hundred thousand dollars somehow accrue tens of millions of dollars in net worth while in their positions. We're curious where this wealth comes from. Maybe they're good at investing, and we should seek their advice. But mysteriously, they get wealthy, and we don't know why. The reality is that they're likely getting wealthy at the taxpayer's expense, and that's the honest truth.