reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Anti-vaccine activism, which I refer to as anti-science aggression, has emerged as a significant global threat. During the COVID pandemic, 200,000 Americans lost their lives due to vaccine refusal, despite widespread availability. This movement is now spreading to low and middle-income countries and poses a greater risk than gun violence, global terrorism, nuclear threats, or cyber attacks. In the U.S., it has become intertwined with far-right extremism, a trend also seen in Germany. Addressing this issue requires political solutions to combat the rising tide of anti-science sentiment.

It is absurd for elected officials to decide medical treatments. Countries with high vaccination rates have high mortality rates, while those with low rates have lower mortality. Romania's low vaccination rate is due to distrust in the government. Opposition in the Romanian Parliament and public pressure prevented a vaccination mandate. Fellow EU parliament members criticized their stance, but some are now acknowledging their concerns about adverse effects. They encourage colleagues to speak out about their experiences. Access to private healthcare in the European Parliament differs from the general population's access.

Not many people in Canada have immunity to the infection, which shows that they have done a great job in preventing its spread. This lack of immunity is due to the low number of natural infections.

When searching for vaccines online, you'll often come across anti-vaccine misinformation. Social media platforms like Facebook amplify this misinformation. Amazon is a major platform for anti-vaccine books, with only a few pro-vaccine books available. Anti-vaccine groups have also become politically active, spreading false information to state legislators. Unfortunately, there is a lack of pro-vaccine advocates in the country, with only a handful of academics defending vaccines. Many parents who are hesitant about vaccines can be convinced through conversations explaining the evidence that vaccines do not cause autism.

Speaker 0 describes a highly significant and controversial issue surrounding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines, including Gardasil and Cervarix, and reports that lawsuits are occurring worldwide. In Japan, there have been major lawsuits with hundreds of plaintiffs, including young women and girls, though the fundamental problem, according to the speaker, centers on contamination with DNA impurities. The speaker states that from the early days of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in Japan, the core issue has been the contamination with DNA impurities in vaccines, and that this problem had already become clear by 2012 in a widely cited paper. The speaker explains that by 2012, a paper described the DNA contamination in Gardasil-related vaccines, specifically noting residual DNA fragments from HPV types 16 and 18 associated with the vaccine’s aluminum adjuvant particles. The claim is that vaccine samples contained residual HPV DNA fragments that were directly bound to aluminum adjuvant particles, and that PCR tests confirmed these DNA fragments were identical to the HPV sequences described in the paper. The speaker emphasizes that researchers around the world—doctors and researchers listening to women and girls’ voices—noticed unusual, severe post-vaccination symptoms in children and young women, and saw potential links between these symptoms and the residual HPV DNA attached to adjuvants. The testimony references samples gathered from multiple countries (Australia, Bulgaria, France, India, New Zealand, Poland, Russia, Spain, and the United States) and asserts that nearly all of the Gardasil/HPV vaccine lots examined contained residual HPV DNA attached to aluminum adjuvant particles. The speaker mentions that in the specific investigation, sixteen samples of Gardasil-4 contained residual HPV DNA fragments bound to aluminum adjuvant particles, and that all samples tested via PCR showed the same DNA sequence as described in the 2012 paper. The speaker claims that in 2014, the vaccine program for cervical cancer halted in Japan, and that the subsequent attention brought this issue to light publicly. The discussion attributes the major role to a Japanese expert, Ishii Ken (Ishii-sensei), described as a leading figure in Japan’s vaccine adverse-event research. The speaker recounts that, in the years around 2012–2014, efforts involved international collaboration with HR/HSA, FDA, and others, although logistical obstacles caused delays. The speaker notes that in 2012, 16 vaccine packages were distributed in nine countries for examination and that contamination persisted in all samples. They credit Japan with acting as a global relay for disseminating information about DNA contamination and its potential health implications. Further, the speaker references a broader context: the later emergence of literature discussing how DNA contamination might relate to adverse neurological or systemic symptoms, and the evolution of guidelines on acceptable residual DNA in vaccines. The discussion mentions that WHO and FDA guidelines permit changing permissible DNA limits over time, with higher thresholds introduced for manufacturing and regulatory purposes, raising questions about what constitutes safety and what is permissible in drug development. The dialogue closes with Speaker 1 alluding to the seriousness of the issue, noting deaths in the context of messenger-type vaccines and subsequent debates about vaccine safety, while acknowledging that those opposed to this view are also active.

A student at Saint Dominique College in Saint-Herblain experienced a vasovagal episode and fell after receiving a vaccination. This is a known risk associated with vaccinations and not related to the injected product. The student was immediately attended to by medical teams from the University Hospital of Nantes. The incident led to the suspension of the HPV vaccination campaign in Loire-Atlantique. However, the vaccine is considered safe, with no previous similar events reported among the 20,000 HPV vaccinations administered in France. Parents have the choice to vaccinate their children against HPV, as it is not mandatory. Medical teams monitor patients for 15 minutes after vaccination to ensure their well-being. An investigation is ongoing.

The organized anti-vaccine movement significantly influenced public perception of the COVID vaccine, leading to an estimated 200,000 unnecessary deaths in the U.S. due to vaccine refusal. This movement targeted individuals and spread misinformation about vaccine safety. In contrast, our low-cost COVID vaccine, developed without a patent, successfully reached 100 million people, particularly in India and Indonesia. However, the primary responsibility for vaccine hesitancy still lies with the organized anti-vaccine efforts.

The Gardasil vaccine, aimed at preventing cervical cancer, is facing scrutiny due to reports of serious side effects. Concerns include seizures, paralysis, and even deaths. Some individuals experienced chronic pain, loss of mobility, and other debilitating symptoms. The safety of vaccines, the increase in chronic illnesses in children, and the need for further research are highlighted. Parents and medical professionals are calling for investigations and caution in administering the vaccine. Many have stopped recommending it due to safety concerns, opting for traditional preventive measures like pap smears. The emotional toll and life-altering impact on affected individuals are emphasized.

Our country is polluted with misinformation. When we reach a vaccination rate of 90-95%, instead of having 20,000 cases per day, we will have 500 or 300 cases, resulting in less impact on public health. However, the hope of ending the crisis was short-lived in France, as we set a new record of over 160,000 new cases. Some people on TV have never seen a Covid patient in their lives. Pfizer was chosen because they completed their phase three study first. The vaccine is still in the experimental phase, but claims that it is still in development are false. Vaccination reduces the risk of contamination by 12 or 6 times, and it also reduces the risk of transmission of the variant. This dissemination of misinformation is almost treasonous.

Anti-vaccine activism, which is referred to as anti-science aggression, has become a deadly force globally. In the US alone, 200,000 lives were lost due to people refusing the COVID vaccine, even when it was widely available. This dangerous movement has now spread to low and middle income countries, causing more harm. Shockingly, science-related deaths now surpass those caused by gun violence, terrorism, nuclear proliferation, and cyber attacks. It has also transformed into a political movement in the US and Germany, representing a new face of anti-science aggression. Political solutions are urgently needed to tackle this issue.

Anti-vaccine activism, which is referred to as anti-science aggression, has become a deadly force during the COVID pandemic. In the US alone, 200,000 lives were lost due to people refusing the vaccine, despite its widespread availability. This movement is now spreading to low and middle-income countries, causing more harm. Shockingly, science-related deaths now surpass those caused by gun violence, global terrorism, nuclear proliferation, or cyber threats. Moreover, this anti-vaccine activism has become politically linked to far-right extremism in the US and Germany. It represents a new form of aggression against science.

Unvaccinated populations are hesitant due to past issues with the DTP vaccine causing severe injuries or death in children. Bill Gates claimed it saved lives in Africa, but Danish studies revealed vaccinated girls were dying at a higher rate from unrelated illnesses due to weakened immune systems. The vaccine protected against diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis but left them vulnerable to other diseases.

Some people claim that vaccines are a way to poison us, but that doesn't make sense. Many cancer patients have been vaccinated, and if vaccines were poisonous, we would have noticed. Billions of people have been vaccinated and are healthy, so the idea that vaccines cause an unusually high number of cancers is unfounded.

The speakers discuss the vaccination landscape around human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines, focusing on a controversial issue they claim has been known and disseminated since early on: contamination with DNA (DNA residuals) from Deinococcus or related genetic material in vaccines and the implications of aluminum adjuvants used in Gardasil/Gardasil 9. - They begin by asserting that HPV vaccines, including Gardasil/Sil, have been the subject of remarkable legal actions worldwide, including four major lawsuits in Japan. They note that historically, in Japan, many young women and girls stood as plaintiffs, and that the core problem they highlight is the DNA contamination issue (referred to as “ディー エ ヌ エー 混 入 汚 染 問 題”). - The claim is that from early on, the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and others acknowledged this contamination as central. They reference a 2012 paper that reportedly made the DNA contamination problem very clear, naming pathogens such as Human Papillomavirus, HPV, and DEIN? They describe that vaccine particles (HBV? HPBL DNA fragments) were found to be directly bound to aluminum adjuvant particles in Gardasil, implying a mechanism by which residual DNA could be involved in adverse effects. - The speakers say that the 2012 study, and subsequent work, led to attention from doctors worldwide who listened to the voices of women and girls and wondered what was happening with the vaccine recipients. They claim that samples showed that residual HPV DNA fragments were consistently present and directly linked to aluminum adjuvant particles, and that “PCR” detection indicated the same DNA sequences across samples. They mention that the 2012 paper’s findings were followed by reporting that, by 2014, vaccination had been suspended in Japan earlier than many would have expected. - They recount a process in which major scientists from various countries (France, the UK, and others) were involved in investigating adenoviral or genetic components (they reference Shihan? and others) and that the Japan-based researchers, including Ishii Ken, were central figures. They describe meetings, PowerPoint presentations at a hotel, and a sequence of visits to the UK and the US (including HR-related planning with U.S. FDA and the UK authorities) that were interrupted by closures in the Obama era, leading to documentation and discussions about the safety concerns. - The speakers claim that by the 2012 report and again by 2014, all vaccine samples from multiple countries contained residual DNA, and that Japan became a hub for disseminating awareness of these issues globally. They state that the issue was present not only in the early Gardasil (Gardasil-4) but also in later forms, with references to Gardasil-9 and the idea that the DNA contamination and adjuvant interactions could contribute to immune and neurological symptoms in recipients, particularly in women and girls. - They discuss changes to WHO and FDA guidelines on residual DNA limits, noting a progression from 10 picograms to higher thresholds over time, implying corporate interests in allowing higher residual DNA quantities in vaccines. They emphasize that the shift in limits is tied to pharmaceutical companies’ needs, not human biology changes, and argue that Japan highlighted the problem of Deinance-DNA contamination during the cervical cancer vaccine era, signaling that researchers, journalists, and victims were aware long before others. - Finally, Speaker 1 adds that two points became clear a year earlier: the disruption of messenger RNA–type vaccines as a response to safety concerns, and the subsequent rise in adverse outcomes after widespread vaccination, including deaths, which they claim intensified opposition to these vaccines. Note: The summary presents the speakers' claims and sequencing of events as described in the transcript without evaluation or endorsement.

Vaccine skepticism in the U.S. leads to more deaths outside the U.S. than inside. In the U.S., measles may kill four per thousand children, while in other countries, it's more like two hundred per thousand due to lack of medical care and nutrition. Vaccine skepticism transfers and kills more children outside the U.S.

People's trust in politicians and the health system was tested during the pandemic. However, the results were not as good as expected. Some conspiracy theories, including anti-vaxx beliefs, spread widely. Vaccine acceptance for diseases like measles may also be affected. Many people took the vaccines, but a significant minority believed in rare side effects and evil conspiracies surrounding the vaccines. Overall, there was a step backward in terms of vaccine acceptance and trust.

People in America are skeptical about the information surrounding vaccinations, especially given the rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines. It traditionally takes years to create vaccines, and many feel that nine months isn't sufficient for safety. The conversation highlights the concern that unvaccinated individuals could allow the virus to spread further. While some compare COVID-19 to the flu, the death toll from COVID-19 significantly surpasses that of the flu in recent years. There are suspicions about the motives behind incentivizing vaccinations, suggesting that fear tactics are being used to encourage compliance. Ultimately, the pandemic is perceived by some as driven by fear rather than genuine health concerns.

A vaccine called Gardasil was developed to combat HPV viruses that cause cervical cancer. However, doubts have been raised about its effectiveness. Despite this, politicians worldwide have supported the vaccine. Clinical trials were conducted before its commercialization, but some experts argue that the company lacked scientific expertise. The vaccine was marketed as a solution to eradicate HPV and cervical cancer, but the frequency of the cancer has been decreasing over the years. Lobbying efforts were made to ensure widespread acceptance of Gardasil, targeting politicians and organizations. In the US, Governor Rick Perry passed a law mandating vaccination for young girls, which raised suspicions of influence from the pharmaceutical industry. Similar campaigns were launched globally, and the European Medicines Agency's decision-making process was questioned due to its financial ties to pharmaceutical companies. In France, the health minister bypassed administrative procedures to announce the reimbursement of Gardasil. Critics argue that politicians have been swayed by the promise of a cancer-preventing vaccine without considering the actual medical evidence. The influence of lobbyists and the prioritization of their interests over public health is concerning.

Many countries lack proper safety monitoring systems for vaccines, leading to miscommunication and confusion. Adjuvants are necessary for vaccine effectiveness, but can increase adverse reactions. Long-term effects and cross-reactivity between adjuvants are concerns. Health professionals are starting to question vaccine safety due to lack of confidence and education.

In 2022, over 14 million children did not receive any vaccines. The goal is to reduce that number by 2030, working with partners like Gavi and UNICEF. Anti-vaxxers pose a serious challenge, requiring a strategy to push back, because vaccines work for both children and adults, and there is evidence to support this. It's time to be more aggressive in countering anti-vaxxers, who used COVID as an opportunity to create havoc.

The DTP vaccine, which protects against diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis, was discontinued in the U.S. due to severe adverse effects, including brain injuries and deaths in 1 in 300 children. While it is still administered to millions of children in Africa, a Danish government inquiry into its efficacy revealed alarming findings. Studies conducted over 30 years showed that vaccinated girls were dying at ten times the rate of unvaccinated girls from diseases like anemia and pneumonia, which had never been linked to the vaccine. Although the DTP vaccine protected against its targeted diseases, it compromised the immune systems of these girls, leaving them vulnerable to other minor illnesses. This highlights the necessity for long-term studies on vaccine impacts, a concern not adequately addressed in the U.S.

The current MMR vaccine contains millions of DNA fragments created from aborted fetal tissue, which some people object to on religious grounds. These individuals should be treated with compassion, especially in healthcare settings. One failure of the CDC is not informing doctors that no child should die of measles. Prior to the vaccine's introduction in 1963, there were 400 measles deaths annually out of up to two million cases. While the MMR vaccine doesn't contain fetal cells, it does contain DNA fragments from a fetal cell line originating from a 1960s abortion. Some people have religious objections to this. During a measles outbreak, some individuals felt like they were treated as pariahs in hospitals due to their religious beliefs. Everyone should have a choice and still be treated with respect, regardless of religious objections.

Consider Japan's controversial move to ban the MMR vaccine, standing up to Western pharmaceutical influence. Despite being trashed during COVID for their cautious approach to vaccines, Japan maintains a healthy population. Japan banned the MMR vaccine in 1993 after a four-year experiment led to serious financial and human costs. Out of almost 4,000 medical compensation claims related to vaccines over thirty years, a quarter were from adverse reactions to the combined measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine. There were three deaths, and eight children were left with permanent handicaps. The government opted to continue using individual vaccines instead. This ban specifically targets the combined vaccine, the same one that was scrutinized by Andrew Wakefield. Western countries continue to administer this combined vaccine, while Japan has rejected it due to safety concerns.

French journalists investigate the dangers and insufficient testing of medications on the market. The pharmaceutical lobby works hard in the political arena to quickly bring drugs to market. Doctors and pharmaceutical companies are forming closer ties. Shortly after, many parliamentarians from around the world call for vaccination against cervical cancer. The European Medicines Agency provides advice to the European Commission on whether a drug should be allowed in Europe.